|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 372 OF 849 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jun-22-13 | | PinnedPiece: Its beginning to look like my amazing come-from-behind brilliant performance in the last two rounds might not pan out as I'd hoped. Well, I can see I'm not alone.
. |
|
| Jun-22-13 | | chessmoron: Nakamura - Morozevich 1/2 35
Mamedyarov - Carlsen 0-1 42
Kramnik - Gelfand 1-0 45
Karjakin - Anand 1/2 35
Caruana - Andreikin 1-0 30 |
|
| Jun-22-13 | | wordfunph: Round 9:
Nakamura - Morozevich 1/2 38
Mamedyarov - Carlsen 1/2 46
Kramnik - Gelfand 1/2 37
Karjakin - Anand 1/2 33
Caruana - Andreikin 1/2 46 |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | WinKing: Round 9 Sun June 23
Nakamura - Morozevich 1/2 42
Mamedyarov - Carlsen 0-1 41
Kramnik - Gelfand 1/2 43
Karjakin - Anand 1/2 35
Caruana - Andreikin 1/2 40 |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | twinlark: Round 9
Nakamura - Morozevich 1-0 38
Mamedyarov - Carlsen 1/2 33
Kramnik - Gelfand 1/2 29
Karjakin - Anand 1/2 44
Caruana - Andreikin 1-0 56 |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | Golden Executive: Round 9
Nakamura - Morozevich 1-0 40
Mamedyarov - Carlsen 0-1 30
Kramnik - Gelfand 1/2 30
Karjakin - Anand 1/2 30
Caruana - Andreikin 1/2 30 |
|
Jun-23-13
 | | SwitchingQuylthulg: Round 9:
Nakamura - Morozevich 0-1 25
Mamedyarov - Carlsen 0-1 44
Kramnik - Gelfand 1/2 31
Karjakin - Anand 1/2 36
Caruana - Andreikin 1/2 30 |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | Golden Executive: Games have started |
|
Jun-23-13
 | | OhioChessFan: ♔ In Game Update ♔
Karjakin and Vishy blitzed through a 35 move draw. Kramnik and Gelfand had a 25 move draw. Caurana-Andreikin is even about 20 moves in, Naka-Moro is also even. Mamedyarov is a bit better against Carlsen. |
|
Jun-23-13
| | OhioChessFan: ♔ Update ♔
Mamedyarov-Carlsen was a 34 move draw. Naka is losing against Moro. Caruana-Andeikin reached time control in an even position. |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | chessmoron: ♔ Tal 2013: <FINAL Round> Results ♔ <Caruana-Andreikin, 1/2-1/2 in 41 moves.> Exact, 10 points: []
Under, 7 points: [['WinKing', '1/2-1/2', '40']]
2nd Under, 6 points: [['Golden Executive', '1/2-1/2', '30'], ['SwitchingQuylthulg', '1/2-1/2', '30']] 3rd Under, 5 points: [['Penguincw', '1/2-1/2', '26']] Over, 3 points: []
2nd Over, 2 points: [['wordfunph', '1/2-1/2', '46'], ['Robin01', '1/2-1/2', '46']] 3rd Over, 1 point1: []
===
<Karjakin-Anand, 1/2-1/2 in 35 moves.> Exact, 10 points: [['chessmoron', '1/2-1/2', '35'], ['WinKing', '1/2-1/2', '35']] Under, 7 points: []
2nd Under, 6 points: [['wordfunph', '1/2-1/2', '33'], ['PinnedPiece', '1/2-1/2', '33']] 3rd Under, 5 points: [['Golden Executive', '1/2-1/2', '30']] Over, 3 points: []
2nd Over, 2 points: [['SwitchingQuylthulg', '1/2-1/2', '36']] 3rd Over, 1 point1: [['Robin01', '1/2-1/2', '37']]
===
<Kramnik-Gelfand, 1/2-1/2 in 25 moves.> Exact, 10 points: []
Under, 7 points: []
2nd Under, 6 points: []
3rd Under, 5 points: []
Over, 3 points: [['twinlark', '1/2-1/2', '29']]
2nd Over, 2 points: [['Golden Executive', '1/2-1/2', '30']] 3rd Over, 1 point1: [['SwitchingQuylthulg', '1/2-1/2', '31']] ===
<Mamedyarov-Carlsen, 1/2-1/2 in 34 moves.> Exact, 10 points: []
Under, 7 points: [['twinlark', '1/2-1/2', '33']]
2nd Under, 6 points: []
3rd Under, 5 points: []
Over, 3 points: []
2nd Over, 2 points: [['lostemperor', '1/2-1/2', '38'], ['Penguincw', '1/2-1/2', '38']] 3rd Over, 1 point1: [['OhioChessFan', '1/2-1/2', '40']] ===
<Nakamura-Morozevich, 0-1 in 49 moves.> Exact, 10 points: []
Under, 7 points: [['SwitchingQuythulg', '0-1', '25']] 2nd Under, 6 points: []
3rd Under, 5 points: []
Over, 3 points: []
2nd Over, 2 points: []
3rd Over, 1 point1: [] |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | chessmoron: FINAL Round Summary:
Perfect # moves predictions for this round goes to:
<chessmoron> and <WinKing> Highest scores in the Bonus Ranker: 13 points <Golden Executive> Results:
Moves Ranker - Through <FINAL Round> Score, UserID, Over, Under, Exact
♔ 45, wordfunph, 0, 5, 1
♘ 41, twinlark, 1, 4, 1
♗ 34, chessmoron, 0, 2, 2
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
28, SwitchingQuylthulg, 0, 4, 0
27, OhioChessFan, 1, 2, 1
27, PinnedPiece, 2, 3, 0
24, lostemperor, 0, 2, 1
24, whiteshark, 1, 3, 0
20, Golden Executive, 1, 1, 1
17, WinKing, 0, 1, 1
10, Ragh, 1, 1, 0
7, lost in space, 0, 1, 0
7, Robin01, 0, 1, 0
3, Penguincw, 1, 0, 0
0, The Last Straw, 0, 0, 0
===
Bonus Ranker - Through <FINAL Round> Score, UserID, 3-Over, 2-Over, 3-Under, 2-Under
♔ 49, lostemperor, 0, 4, 1, 6
♘ 39, wordfunph, 2, 2, 3, 3
♗ 33, WinKing, 2, 2, 3, 2
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
31, Penguincw, 0, 4, 1, 3
30, Robin01, 5, 5, 3, 0
29, OhioChessFan, 3, 2, 2, 2
28, Golden Executive, 2, 2, 2, 2
21, SwitchingQuylthulg, 2, 1, 1, 2
16, chessmoron, 1, 2, 1, 1
15, twinlark, 1, 1, 0, 2
15, whiteshark, 3, 3, 0, 1
12, PinnedPiece, 1, 0, 1, 1
7, The Last Straw, 0, 1, 1, 0
6, Ragh, 1, 0, 1, 0
0, lost in space, 0, 0, 0, 0
===
Moves+Bonus Ranker - Through <FINAL Round> Score, UserID
♔ 84, wordfunph
♘ 73, lostemperor
♗ 56, OhioChessFan
♗ 56, twinlark
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
50, chessmoron
50, WinKing
49, SwitchingQuylthulg
48, Golden Executive
39, PinnedPiece
39, whiteshark
37, Robin01
34, Penguincw
16, Ragh
7, lost in space
7, The Last Straw
===
Moves Ranker (# of 1st place UNDER/OVER) - Through <FINAL Round> Score,UserID
♔ 6, twinlark
♔ 6, wordfunph
♘ 5, PinnedPiece
♗ 4, chessmoron
♗ 4, OhioChessFan
♗ 4, SwitchingQuylthulg
♗ 4, whiteshark
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
3, Golden Executive
3, lostemperor
2, Ragh
2, WinKing
1, lost in space
1, Penguincw
1, Robin01
0, The Last Straw |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | chessmoron: ♔ <WINNER'S CORNER> ♔ ♔♔♔♘ <wordfunph> Tal13:StdMvRnk(1) + BonusRnk(2) + StdMv/Bonus(1) + 1stRanker(1t) ♔♘♗ <twinlark> Tal13:StdMvRnk(2) + StdMv/Bonus(3t) + 1stRanker(1t) ♔♘ <lostemperor> Tal13:BonusRnk(1) + StdMv/Bonus(2) ♘ <PinnedPiece> Tal13:1stRanker(2) ♗♗ <chessmoron> Tal13:StdMvRnk(3) + 1stRanker(3t) ♗♗ <OhioChessFan> Tal13:StdMv/Bonus(3t) + 1stRanker(3t) ♗ <SwitchingQuylthulg> Tal13:1stRanker(3t) ♗ <whiteshark> Tal13:1stRanker(3t) ♗ <WinKing> Tal13: BonusRnk(3) |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | PinnedPiece: For some reason I consider moves + bonus ranker to be the most prestigious, or the central, or main, contest to win. Not sure quite why. But anyway lots of honors and congratulations to:
<<Moves+Bonus Ranker - Through <FINAL Round>Score, UserID
K 84, wordfunph
N 73, lostemperor
B 56, OhioChessFan
B 56, twinlark>
Many thanks to <chessmoron> for all the work and calculations (do you have a nice spreadsheet app that does this for you automatically?) and to <OCF> for giving up his forum to the contest for the duration. . |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | WinKing: Thanks <chessmorom> for running this exciting contest & thanks to <OhioChessFan> for hosting. Congrats to all the medal winners! We had a nice race going between <lostemperor> & <wordfunph> in the Moves+Bonus Ranker category till the very end. <wordfunph> prevailed with a fine performance throughout the contest - kudos to both. |
|
Jun-23-13
 | | chancho: Charades
Gimme The Funk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7xv... |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | chessmoron: <(do you have a nice spreadsheet app that does this for you automatically?)> I use a software program developed by User: ganstaman |
|
Jun-23-13
| | OhioChessFan: Congratulations to all the winners. 3 current Hall of Famers earned gold medals this time around. <wordfunph> earned 3 golds. <lostemperor> and <twinlark> one each. A really hard tournament to predict and I'm amazed at even getting a couple of thirds. Thanks to <chessmoron> for running the show, and to <WinKing> for double checking all scores. |
|
Jun-23-13
| | OhioChessFan: I am hoping <chessmoron> plans on running Dortmund. Whenever the next tournament might be, see you there. |
|
Jun-23-13
| | OhioChessFan: <PiPi: For some reason I consider moves + bonus ranker to be the most prestigious, or the central, or main, contest to win. Not sure quite why. > I have the same opinion. But I'm always happy to do well in any of the contests. It's tough all the way around, and you need to be both lucky and good. |
|
Jun-23-13
| | OhioChessFan: Thanks <chancho> getting funky on the forum |
|
Jun-23-13
 | | Penguincw: Thanks for hosting and organizing. |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | lostemperor: Congrats to all medalist and <wordfunph> in particular who was simply too strong. Thanks for the <chessmoron> - <OhioChessFan> team for running the contest. |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | twinlark: Thanks again <Ohio> and <chessmoron> for running a great competition. |
|
| Jun-23-13 | | Golden Executive: Thanks <OhioChessFan> for hosting and commenting and <chessmoron> for running . Congratulations to all the winners and especially to <wordfunph> for a great performance! See you guys next time. |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 372 OF 849 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|
Kibitzing
rreusser/...