chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Amsterdam IBM Tournament

Lev Polugaevsky12/15(+9 -0 =6)[games]
Viktor Korchnoi11/15(+7 -0 =8)[games]
Wolfgang Uhlmann9.5/15(+6 -2 =7)[games]
Laszlo Szabo9/15(+5 -2 =8)[games]
Kick Langeweg8.5/15(+6 -4 =5)[games]
Ljubomir Ljubojevic8.5/15(+5 -3 =7)[games]
Jan Hein Donner8/15(+4 -3 =8)[games]
Hans Ree8/15(+3 -2 =10)[games]
Jan Timman8/15(+4 -3 =8)[games]
Borislav Ivkov7/15(+2 -3 =10)[games]
Burkhard Malich7/15(+3 -4 =8)[games]
Karl Robatsch6/15(+3 -6 =6)[games]
Walter Browne5/15(+1 -6 =8)[games]
Nikola Padevsky4.5/15(+2 -8 =5)[games]
Bert Enklaar4/15(+2 -9 =4)[games]
Rob Hartoch4/15(+1 -8 =6)[games]
*

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Amsterdam IBM (1972)

Initiated by IBM employee Willem Wolthuis and others, the IBM tournaments in Amsterdam ran from 1961 to 1981. The event in 1972 was the twelfth in the series. (1) Of the sixteen invited players, ten were GMs, including the Soviet favorites Korchnoi and Polugaevsky. After the introductory speeches by Max Euwe, Johan Zwanepol and others, drawing of lots took place on 29 May in the Alpha Hotel. (2) The European Cup soccer trophy had been brought there by 11 Ajax juniors, and the players drew numbered miniature football shoes out from it. (3) Play started the next day in the RAI Congress Centre. (4) Time of play was 1-6 pm, except for 31 May, due to the European Cup soccer final between Ajax and Inter. The time for eventual resumptions was set to 8-10 pm. (5) Tournament director: Willem Wolthuis. Constant Orbaan was arbiter. (6) The tournament started one day later than Las Palmas (1972).

RAI Congrescentrum, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 30 May - 17 June 1972

Elo* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Pts Prizes (6) 1 GM Polugaevsky 2640 * ½ 1 ½ 1 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 12 3500 2 GM Korchnoi 2670 ½ * ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 11 2500 3 GM Uhlmann 2570 0 ½ * 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 1 1 1 1 1 ½ 9½ 2000 4 GM Szabo 2525 ½ ½ 0 * 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 1 9 1750 =5 IM Langeweg 2425 0 0 ½ 1 * 1 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 0 1 0 ½ 8½ 1400 =5 GM Ljubojevic 2510 0 0 ½ ½ 0 * ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 8½ 1400 =7 GM Donner 2500 ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ * 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 8 ? =7 IM Ree 2430 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 * ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 8 ? =7 IM Timman 2445 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ * ½ 0 0 1 1 1 1 8 ? =10 GM Ivkov 2560 0 ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 7 700 =10 IM Malich 2450 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 1 ½ * ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 7 700 12 GM Robatsch 2460 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 0 1 ½ ½ * ½ 1 ½ 1 6 600 13 GM Browne 2500 ½ ½ 0 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ * 0 0 ½ 5 500 14 GM Padevsky 2460 ½ 0 0 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 0 1 * 1 ½ 4½ 450 =15 Enklaar <2200 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 0 * 0 4 400 =15 IM Hartoch 2400 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 * 4 400

Category: 10 (GM norm 9 points, IM norm 7,5 points). Alongside the GM tournament there was a Masters tournament, won by Artur Hennings, on tiebreak from Drazen Marovic and Gyula Sax. Hennings thus qualified to play in the IBM Amsterdam (1973) GM tournament. (7)

Tournament book: Toernooiboek twaalfde IBM schaaktoernooi 29 mei t/m 24 juni 1972, ed. by Berry Withuis (Toernooicomité, Amsterdam 1972. 175 p.). This introduction is mainly based on the daily reports in the Dutch newspapers (available at http://kranten.delpher.nl/).

1) IBM and Chess, by Bill Wall, posted 2014 at https://web.archive.org/web/2017052...
2) Opened April 1971: https://web.archive.org/web/2016070....
3) De Tijd, 30 May 1972, p. 19.
4) Opened 1961: Wikipedia article: Amsterdam RAI Exhibition and Convention Centre.
5) De Waarheid, 30 May 1972, p. 3.
6) Withuis' tournament book, p. 9. Prizes are in Dutch guilders.
7) Bernard Cafferty in CHESS magazine, July 1972, pp. 298-299.

Original collection: Game Collection: IBM Amsterdam 1972 by User: Tabanus. Thanks to User: Paint My Dragon for information from CHESS, and to User: sneaky pete for information from the tournament book. *FIDE Rating List July 1971: https://web.archive.org/web/2023120....

Previous: Amsterdam IBM (1971). Next: Amsterdam IBM (1973). See also Amsterdam IBM-B (1972)

 page 5 of 5; games 101-120 of 120  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
101. Szabo vs Polugaevsky  ½-½101972Amsterdam IBME52 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Main line with ...b6
102. B Enklaar vs Robatsch  ½-½391972Amsterdam IBMD91 Grunfeld, 5.Bg5
103. R Hartoch vs N Padevsky  ½-½131972Amsterdam IBMB36 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto
104. H Ree vs B Malich  1-0411972Amsterdam IBMD81 Grunfeld, Russian Variation
105. Ivkov vs R Hartoch  1-0461972Amsterdam IBMA04 Reti Opening
106. Korchnoi vs Ljubojevic 1-0271972Amsterdam IBME41 Nimzo-Indian
107. Robatsch vs Szabo  ½-½131972Amsterdam IBMB92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
108. B Malich vs Timman 1-0361972Amsterdam IBMA37 English, Symmetrical
109. J H Donner vs B Enklaar  1-0411972Amsterdam IBMA79 Benoni, Classical, 11.f3
110. N Padevsky vs K Langeweg  0-1491972Amsterdam IBMD38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation
111. Polugaevsky vs Browne  ½-½141972Amsterdam IBMA30 English, Symmetrical
112. H Ree vs Uhlmann  ½-½411972Amsterdam IBMD81 Grunfeld, Russian Variation
113. K Langeweg vs Ivkov  1-0321972Amsterdam IBMA04 Reti Opening
114. B Enklaar vs Korchnoi  0-1461972Amsterdam IBMD91 Grunfeld, 5.Bg5
115. Ljubojevic vs N Padevsky  ½-½241972Amsterdam IBMC11 French
116. Browne vs Robatsch  ½-½341972Amsterdam IBMB58 Sicilian
117. Szabo vs J H Donner  1-0611972Amsterdam IBMB09 Pirc, Austrian Attack
118. R Hartoch vs H Ree  ½-½91972Amsterdam IBMA04 Reti Opening
119. Uhlmann vs B Malich  1-0401972Amsterdam IBMD58 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tartakower (Makagonov-Bondarevsky) Syst
120. Timman vs Polugaevsky  ½-½131972Amsterdam IBME17 Queen's Indian
 page 5 of 5; games 101-120 of 120  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-23-19  Ilkka Salonen: No doubt IBM rendered support to chess also. Nowadays, I feel that TCEC policy of drawn openings reflects indifference to truth which has many connotations. It is as if they are artificially trying to cling to treir edge towards human players too.
Nov-23-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: What's Feng Hso doing these days? Team Feng was the brains behind the IBM Deep Blue project that defeated Gary Kasparov. I guess he has a lower profile these days, but is still a project manager.

Feng himself was rated 2400, a strong player, but said "I go at it now and then [the Deep Blue computer] but can't make a dent in it."

Aug-27-24  Granny O Doul: As I remember, Murray Campbell was the only real chess player among the Deep Blue tech guys.

Hsu may have been the frontal lobe, but I'd think the other programmers and the grandmaster consultants at least were in the cranium somewhere.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC