< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 11 OF 65 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Nov-26-05 | | neveramaster: Happy Birthday, Mr. Reshevsky. Though you never reached the pinnacle like Morphy or Fischer, your longevity and accomplishments are unmatched by any other American player. |
|
Dec-10-05
 | | WTHarvey: Here are some puzzles from Sammy's early games: http://www.wtharvey.com/resh.html |
|
Jan-23-06 | | RookFile: Today's quote of the day:
"For a period of ten years--between 1946 and 1956--Reshevsky was probably the best chessplayer in the world. I feel sure that had he played a match with Botvinnik during that time he would have won and been World Champion. " --- Fischer
|
|
Feb-03-06
 | | WannaBe: If this already has been discussed, just let me know where/page to find it. Why did Fischer and Reshevsky not get along? Did they ever got along? Thanks in adv. |
|
Feb-03-06 | | Caissanist: Well, there seem to have been very few people who *either* Fischer or Reshevsky got along with for any extended period of time, so it would have been a miracle if those two had been buddies. If you wanted to name one particular cause, though, probably it would be the way their 1961 match ended, with Fischer walking out because of what he perceived to be special favors given to Reshevsky. Fischer did not let his personal feelings toward the man bias his judgment of Reshevsky as a chess player, however. One of his great strengths in his prime was an extraordinary objectivity about everything that happened on the chessboard. |
|
Feb-03-06
 | | WannaBe: <Caissanist> Thank you for the answer. :-) Currently I am at the Sousse tournament segment of the book "Russians vs Fischer". And as an interesting trivia/tidbit, the tournament organizers had to modify schedule to suit Fischer and Reshevsky. Fischer is (still?) 7th day adv. and Reshevsky is Judaism. For a while I thought Fischer didn't like Reshevsky because of religion reason! |
|
Feb-25-06 | | Caissanist: Shortly after the Reshevsky match Fischer became a member of an offshoot of an offshoot of the Adventists called The Worldwide Church of God. He hasn't had any public association with them for over twenty years, however, and the denomination more or less disintegrated in the nineties. |
|
Mar-19-06 | | macce: I think Reshevsky was one of the greatest. |
|
Mar-19-06 | | ughaibu: Wasn't he one of the smallest? |
|
Mar-19-06 | | macce: I mean, one of the most talented players of known time?! |
|
Mar-27-06 | | Whitehat1963: <Over the course of a long international career that continued until he was well over sixty years old, he qualified for the Candidates five times, won the U.S. Championship on six occasions (first time in 1936; last time in 1971)and played a record eleven World Champions ranging from Emanuel Lasker to Anatoli Karpov.> Does anyone know who Reshevsky considered the best player he ever played? |
|
Mar-27-06 | | Father Karras: This Reshevsky is over-rated. All this talk about him being the better than Botvinnik... if he was better he would have performed better in 1948 (or even in 1938), not chickened out of the world championship cycle in 1950, done better in 1953 Candidates, or at least have better track records against Botvinnik, Smyslov or Keres. His wins in the US championships were against weak players - if he'd played in a Soviet Championship he'd have been crushed by the talent he faced. |
|
Apr-23-06 | | Silman: Reshevsky is most definitely under-rated by most chess minnows like ourselves. Fischer rated him in his top ten. Keres deliberately lost to Botvinnik in 1948 to prevent Reshevsky being World Champion. The leading Soviets then rigged Zurich 1953 and Curacao 1962. Reshevsky would've whooped any Soviet in a match up until his 1961 match with Fischer. Likewise Fischer would've whooped any Soviet in a match from anytime after his 1961 match with Reshevsky. In Candidates tournaments the Soviets feared Reshevsky and Fischer so much that the Soviets couldn't risk/wouldn't allow Reshevsky or Fischer to compete on a level playing field. Please don't quote players plus & minus scores in response...if you do you miss the point about it not being a level playing field. There is an interesting discussion about this, currently on the Tigran Petrosian page. Hopefully fans of Reshevsky & Fischer will back me there against the fans of the corrupt Soviet School of Chess! |
|
Apr-24-06 | | whatthefat: <Silman: Hopefully fans of Reshevsky & Fischer will back me there against the fans of the corrupt Soviet School of Chess!> I'd prefer 'fans of objectivity', please. |
|
Apr-24-06
 | | keypusher: <Silman> Silly troll. With "fans" like you, Reshevsky and Fischer hardly need detractors. |
|
Apr-24-06 | | TylerD: I put more faith in Father Karras words, that this guy was (is) over-rated, rather than Silman“s claiming the opposite.
A fighter, and all that, sure, but never truly great... Far behind such players as Petrosjan, Tal, Spasskij, Botvinnik, Bronstein, Boleslavskyl, Fischer, Keres, etc. |
|
Apr-24-06 | | paladin at large: <Whitehat1963>
<Does anyone know who Reshevsky considered the best player he ever played?> I recall that on another thread ca. six-eight months ago, someone said they attended a group interview with Reshevsky in NYC shortly before he died. Reshevsky was asked this question and he responded: Capablanca. |
|
Apr-24-06 | | whatthefat: <TylerD>
There were certainly a number of periods in Reshevsky's career where he could be considered among the top few players in the world. I think that should be acknowledged. But to claim he could easily have "whooped" any player in the world up to 1961, well... <Silman> is a case in point. |
|
Apr-24-06 | | Gypsy: Chessmetrics Player Profile: <Samuel Reshevsky> (*1911) Best World Rank: #1 (14 different months between the December 1942 rating list and the October 1953 rating list) Highest Rating: 2785 on the October 1953 rating list, #1 in world, age 41y11m Best Individual Performance: 2807 in Najdorf-Reshevsky I (Mex/NY/Salvador), 1952, scoring 11/18 (61%) vs 2750-rated opposition |
|
Apr-25-06 | | TylerD: "Highest Rating: 2785"
...Just shows the insignificance of such historical "ratings"... |
|
Apr-25-06
 | | Sneaky: Why do you say that? His peak "Sonas rating" is lower than Najdorf and Karpov, but higher than Spassky and Svidler. It's about equal to Paul Keres. To me that sounds about right. |
|
Apr-26-06 | | Silman: <Tyler D> I put more faith in the words of Fischer in relation to Reshevsky than Father Karras lol ...please see the post by Rookfile dated Jan 23rd. For Fischer to say Reshevsky would've beaten Botvinnik...well that guys better qualified than us minnows to speak on the matter. |
|
Apr-27-06 | | whatthefat: Good to see 'proof by quote' is still rampant here.... |
|
Apr-27-06
 | | keypusher: Fischer also said that Lasker was a "coffee-house player" and that all the moves in the Karpov-Kasparov matches -- not just the results or the games, but the individual moves -- were "prearranged." You could fill a book with the stupid things Fischer has said about chess, to say nothing of other subjects. <Silman> do yourself a favor and play through the games in the 1948 match-tournament or the Zurich 1953 Candidates tournament. You'll quickly realize that Reshevsky was not the best player at either event. |
|
Apr-27-06
 | | plang: "Keres deliberately lost to Botvinnik in 1948 to prevent Reshevsky being World Champion." You could at least have the decency to add "Many people think". The "eveidence is not that clear cut and I, for one, am unconvinced. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 11 OF 65 ·
Later Kibitzing> |