| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45
|1. E S Rosen vs Robson
|| ||½-½||49||2010||USA Junior Championship||B51 Sicilian, Canal-Sokolsky (Rossolimo) Attack|
|2. S Zierk vs D Yang
|| ||0-1||37||2010||USA Junior Championship||A07 King's Indian Attack|
|3. C Holt vs T Hughes
||½-½||19||2010||USA Junior Championship||E90 King's Indian|
|4. P Zhao vs S Shankland
||1-0||48||2010||USA Junior Championship||B22 Sicilian, Alapin|
|5. W Harper vs J Bryant
|| ||1-0||42||2010||USA Junior Championship||E95 King's Indian, Orthodox, 7...Nbd7, 8.Re1|
|6. E S Rosen vs S Zierk
|| ||0-1||37||2010||USA Junior Championship||C05 French, Tarrasch|
|7. D Yang vs C Holt
|| ||1-0||44||2010||USA Junior Championship||D10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|8. T Hughes vs P Zhao
|| ||½-½||42||2010||USA Junior Championship||D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|9. S Shankland vs W Harper
|| ||0-1||28||2010||USA Junior Championship||E11 Bogo-Indian Defense|
|10. Robson vs J Bryant
||1-0||51||2010||USA Junior Championship||B94 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|11. J Bryant vs S Shankland
|| ||0-1||57||2010||USA Junior Championship||B18 Caro-Kann, Classical|
|12. C Holt vs E S Rosen
||0-1||27||2010||USA Junior Championship||E34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation|
|13. S Zierk vs Robson
||0-1||46||2010||USA Junior Championship||B52 Sicilian, Canal-Sokolsky (Rossolimo) Attack|
|14. P Zhao vs D Yang
|| ||1-0||47||2010||USA Junior Championship||C00 French Defense|
|15. W Harper vs T Hughes
|| ||1-0||33||2010||USA Junior Championship||A10 English|
|16. Robson vs S Shankland
|| ||½-½||31||2010||USA Junior Championship||B18 Caro-Kann, Classical|
|17. S Zierk vs C Holt
|| ||1-0||40||2010||USA Junior Championship||C01 French, Exchange|
|18. T Hughes vs J Bryant
|| ||0-1||44||2010||USA Junior Championship||A60 Benoni Defense|
|19. D Yang vs W Harper
|| ||1-0||60||2010||USA Junior Championship||E29 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch|
|20. E S Rosen vs P Zhao
|| ||0-1||45||2010||USA Junior Championship||A07 King's Indian Attack|
|21. S Shankland vs T Hughes
|| ||1-0||60||2010||USA Junior Championship||E67 King's Indian, Fianchetto|
|22. C Holt vs Robson
|| ||½-½||30||2010||USA Junior Championship||E34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation|
|23. W Harper vs E S Rosen
|| ||0-1||52||2010||USA Junior Championship||E20 Nimzo-Indian|
|24. J Bryant vs D Yang
|| ||½-½||28||2010||USA Junior Championship||A07 King's Indian Attack|
|25. P Zhao vs S Zierk
||1-0||79||2010||USA Junior Championship||A80 Dutch|
| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45
TIP: You can make the above ads go away by registering a free account!
|Jul-19-10|| ||laskerian: The ethical attitude displayed by Parker Zhao in deviating from the Krush-Melekhina game is something to be admired. Although that netted him a loss against Robson, I think he earned a lot of respect in going his own way.|
|Jul-19-10|| ||beenthere240: /Robson is "running away"? Half point lead.|
|Jul-19-10|| ||beenthere240: Shankland's last game was a brutal attack. Fun for sadists to replay.|
|Jul-20-10|| ||FSR: Very weird to compare the Junior and Women's championships. The two tournaments were held simultaneously, had the same number of players/rounds, and were similar in strength. In the Junior championship, 6/9 got you a tie for first. In the women's championship, 7.5/9 got you a tie for second!|
|Jul-20-10|| ||Landman: Great quote from Warren Harper: "In open tournaments, you lose a couple games, you play a weak player and then you can boost your confidence back up. But in this tournament, you lose five games in a row, and you play Ray Robson."|
|Jul-20-10|| ||FSR: Shankland beat Zhao in the first playoff game to advance to the final Armageddon game against Robson. Shankland had Black and received draw odds (i.e. a draw would give Shankland the championship). Shankland played the Caro-Kann, Robson responded with the Fantasy Variation (3.f3), got nothing, sacrificed a pawn to try to do something, still got nothing, then in gross time pressure blundered a piece and lost. Congratulations to Sam Shankland! He just demonstrated the world's weirdest way to win a championship: announce right before the tournament that you're retiring from chess; lose your first two games; score 5-1 in the remaining games, which is good enough to tie for first after both of the players ahead of you falter in the last round (Robson losing and Zhao only drawing an ending two pawns up); then win both your games in the Armageddon playoff. I hope Shankland reconsiders his decision to quit the game. He is obviously a very talented player.|
|Jul-21-10|| ||Bdellovibrio: So this is the elusive norm for Mr. Shankland?|
|Jul-21-10|| ||FSR: I don't think so. I haven't heard anyone mention that. I don't think there were enough high-titled players to make a GM norm possible (Robson was the only GM and Shankland the only IM). Moreover, 6-3 isn't a very impressive score; I doubt that it would be a GM norm.|
|Jul-21-10|| ||sisyphus: Certainly you'd need more titled players for norms. Just for reference, Shankland's performance was 2539, less than his rating of 2563. Also I think these are USCF ratings, about 100 points higher than the FIDE equivalent.|
Thanks to the Saint Louis Chess Club for posting the entire webcast of the final game. It was shocking to see Robson fall behind on time so quickly in an even position.
|Jul-24-10|| ||turbo231: Congratulations to Shankland for a job well done!|
|Aug-05-10|| ||goldfarbdj: Man. I still think of Sam as the 1600-rated preteen I used to play in Berkeley. A lot can happen to a kid in six years.|
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC