chessgames.com

Robert James Fischer vs Viktor Korchnoi
Curacao ct 1962  ·  Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 36 times; par: 54 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Fischer/Korchnoi games
sac: 13...Bxg4 PGN: download | view Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

Java Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Chess Viewer Deluxe Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing >
Dec-10-08   pmarrone: Korchnoi's 15...Nxc2 is a pretty move.
Dec-21-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <This game is an object example of how one result can put even top players off a line; 6.Be2 is far from bad, yet Korchnoi's crushing victory here put 6.Bd3 in the spotlight>

One important difference between the moves being that with the bishop on d3 supporting e4, the same Qa5-Qxc5 maneuver doesn't work, since Qa5 doesn't create the threat of Nxe4.

This may be the only time in Fischer's career where he fell straight into what amounts to an opening trap. In the first 12 moves Korchnoi manages to transform the Pirc into a Sicilian Dragon setup, of a kind which is quite comfortable for Black, and then 13.g4?? blunders the game away.

Jan-14-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: On 11 Nc4 b5 12 Be3 Qb4 13 a3 traps Black's Queen.
Jan-17-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  freeman8201: I read an article on Chess Life and Korchnoi was given advice by another Russian Player! This "player" told Korchnoi; Fischer would play a certin line against the Pirc Austrian and found an improvement to benefit black!
Jan-21-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <On 11 Nc4 b5 12 Be3 Qb4 13 a3 traps Black's Queen.>

Instead of 11...b5(??), 11...Ng4! should give Black a good game, taking advantage of the bishop on e2 being overloaded by guarding both c4 and g4.

Jan-21-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  freeman8201: How can black benefit from 11...Ng4
Jan-22-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <How can black benefit from 11.[Nc4] Ng4>

It threatens Nf2+. After 12.Bxg4 Bxg4 13. Qxg4 Qxc4 Black is ahead in development and his pieces are more active; after 12.Qe1 Nb4 White is under pressure.

Jan-29-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: On 11 Nc4 Ng4 12 Bxg4 Bxg4 13 Qxg4 Qxc4 14 Bd2 seems adequate.
Jan-29-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <On 11 Nc4 Ng4 12 Bxg4 Bxg4 13 Qxg4 Qxc4 14 Bd2 seems adequate.>

"Adequate" not to lose immediately, but after 14...b5, for example, Black has the initiative; it's a complete failure of White's opening strategy to reach such a position after 14 moves. Not that the position reached in the actual game was so great either (though it was definitely better, before the blunder on move 13) - which means that Fischer didn't handle the opening so well even earlier.

Jan-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: On 11 Nc4 Ng4 12 Bxg4 Bxg4 13 Qxg4 Qxc4 14 Bd2 White might like a more threatening position, but I am not sure whether Black does stand all that well. His Queen occupies the post which he would really like his Knight to occupy, the Knight hasn't come into contact with c4 yet, and neither Rook has come to c8 yet. On 15 Rad1 White's pieces are actually slightly ahead in development of Black's pieces. On 14... b5 15 Rad1 ( ignoring the threat of ...b4) 15... b4 16 Nd5 (threatening 17 Nb6) 16...Qxc2 17 f5 begins an attack. It may warrant looking at further.
Jan-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: I really don't see why c4 is the only good square for the black knight, Black's queen and minor pieces seem very well placed where they are and the rooks are ready to join the action; engine evaluation in this line after 14...b5, btw, is close to +1 for Black. The specific line [11 Nc4 Ng4 12 Bxg4 Bxg4 13 Qxg4 Qxc4 14 Bd2 b5] 15 Rad1 b4 16 Nd5 is just plain horrible for White after 16...Qxe4.
Jan-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: After 11 Nc4 Ng4 12 Bxg4 Bxg4 13 Qxg4 Qxc4 14 Bd2 b5, 15 f5 b4 16 Nd5 may be more exact than 15 Rad1 b4 16 Nd5 assuming that White cannot afford to give up the e pawn. For that matter, 14 f5 may save a tempo for Bg5.
Feb-25-09   M.D. Wilson: Korchnoi's style is hard to nail down, but which historical player does he have most in common with stylistically. I think, that at his best, Korchnoi had all the elements of Lasker, coupled with a killer instinct; in a sense, though, Korchnoi has always played by his own rules.
Feb-26-09   bunbun: I was looking back at the spanish translations and there was some confusion. please note that if you wanted to say 'surprises give us life' you'd have to say 'sorpresas nos DAN la vida'.
Mar-15-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Some call me Tim: Fischer once said he feared Korchnoi more than any other opponent in the 1971 Candidates' because he couldn't understand his moves. Here it is strange he did not see the threat of Korchnoi's buildup on the b-file but it is characteristic of his poor play in the first third of this tournament. An exchange and two pawns down by move 17. Disaster.
May-13-09   FlashinthePan: First, I didn't understand Fischer's 33.Rg3, apparently giving the exchange. Then I saw the trap of 33...Bxg3 34.Nd4 Q moves (e.g. to b2) 35.Qf6+ with perpetual check. Ultimately, this ill-inspired trap will have allowed Kortchnoi's brilliancy of 33...Qxg3, precipitating White's end.
May-13-09   AnalyzeThis: Well, the alternative move at 33 was to plain old resign. Once you think that way, a little cheapo at the end doesn't hurt anything.
May-13-09   FlashinthePan: That's right, but my point was that Fischer may well have overlooked 33...Qxg3. Otherwise, given his legendary ego, chances are he wouldn't have given Kortchnoi the opportunity of this dazzling coup de grace.
May-13-09   AnalyzeThis: I don't agree with that last point, but Fischer certainly get his butt kicked in this game.
Jul-13-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: Instead of 11 Nd2, according to Korchnoi "He should have played 11 Nc4! It is true that with 11...Ng4 Black could have forced White to sacrifice the exchange ( 12 Bxg4 Bxg4 looks bad for him) but for fine compensation; 12 Nd5 Nf2+ 13 Rxf2 Qxf2 13 Be3 Qh4 15 Ncb6 Rb8 16 Nxc8 Rfxc8 17 g3 Qh6 18 f5 g5 19 Qd2 Bf6 20 h4, or 19...Bxb2 20 Bxg5 Qg7 21 Rf1- Black has a difficult position.

Instead of the Knight thrust to g4 there was also 11...Bg4. After 12 Be3 Qh5 13 Bxg4 Nxg4 14 h3 Nxe3 ( 14...Bxc3?! 15 bxc3 Nf6) 15 Qxh5 gxh5 16 Nxe3 White's position is slightly better." (Korchnoi)

Jul-13-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: if they played a match for the WC it would have been something!!
Sep-18-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ulhumbrus: <Open Defence: if they played a match for the WC it would have been something!!> That is one match which it was a pity did not take place. A few other historical examples of other matches it would have been interesting to see the result of are Morphy- Staunton, Morphy- Steinitz ( Morphy was only a year older than Steinitz), Lasker- Pillsbury, Lasker- Nimzovich, Capablanca- Rubinstein, Alekhine- Capablanca ( return match), Alekhine - Lasker, Alekhine- Botvinnik, Alekhine- Fine, Alekhine - Reshevsky, Botvinnik- Fine, Botvinnik- Reshevsky, Tal- Fischer, Spassky- Petrosian ( return match), Fischer- Karpov and Kasparov- Fischer.
Sep-18-09   DrCurmudgeon: A Fischer - Korchnoi match probably would have ended up like the Fischer - Reshevsky match.
Sep-18-09   apple pi: <Ulhumbrus> Alekhine-Flohr and Kasparov-Tal would also be nice, if perhaps one-sided.
Nov-09-09   remolino: 13.g4 was an oversight by Fisher. Wonderful tactical alertness by Korchnoi. This is 1962.
Jump directly to page #    (enter number from 1 to 3)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing >

Algebraic edition, 2008
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Round 5
from WCC Index [Curacao 1962] by Hesam7
Winning with Pirc against world champion
from Games worth watching IMHO by Kandelabr
hesperus' favorite games
by hesperus
kuoni's favorite Pirc games
by kuoni
Curacao ct 1962
from Favorite Games #4 (1960-1979) by wanabe2000
Game 38
from Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
Nick's Favorite Games
by nd792001
Match Fischer!
by amadeus
The Pirc
by gmann
Pirc
by Cannon Fodder
Pirc Dragon beats off Austrian Attack
from endgames by dclester
alvaroqp's favorite games
by alvaroqp
Victor Korchnoi's : My Best Games: With Black
by Malacha
Viktor Korchoi: +3, -3, =4
from Fischer's rare defeats. by nikolaas
Pijun na 6. redu, žrtva dame za topa i lagan završetak partije
from tucak's favorite games by tucak
+2 -1 =1 vs. Fischer (Curaçao 'minimatch')
from Match Korchnoi! (i) The Early Years (1956-1984) by amadeus
9
from OMGP V by keypusher
GUESS THE MOVE
by gambitfan
PIRC AUSTRIAN ATTACK
by gambitfan
fischer's rare defeat
from games not to be forgotten by mrajib
plus 5 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies