|Jun-13-04|| ||Gypsy: Austrian master, endgame theoretician, and problem composer; "nemesis' of Maroczy +3 -0 =2. |
|Jul-03-05|| ||WTHarvey: Here are some puzzles from Johann's games: http://www.wtharvey.com/berg.html|
|Jul-03-05|| ||Honza Cervenka: <... but only achieved modest results for the rest of his career.> |
Well, it is true that he was not usually in the head of field in strong tournaments but on the other hand he was quite often hard nut even for the best players of his era. He was solid positional player and firm defender, but he did not lack combinational talent. He had active score not only against Maroczy, but also against three WCH challengers - Zukertort, Gunsberg and Marshall - and tied with two other - Chigorin and Schlechter.
|Jul-03-05|| ||chessgames.com: We've instructed those who write the biographies to avoid subjective commentary like that.|
|Jul-05-07|| ||sneaky pete: Berger played most of his tournament games rather late in life. In 1905, master tournament in Barmen, he took 6th place with 8 from 15, ahead of Chigorin, Alapin, Burn and Mieses. Not bad for a 60 year old, but quite remarkable is how he did it. He scored 4 points against the 5 players finishing above him in the table (Janowski, Maroczy, Marshall, Bernstein and Schlechter) and 4 points against the 10 players below him.|
|Apr-11-08|| ||brankat: A strong master, no doubt, although better known as a writer and editor. Wrote some fine books on chess theory, most notably, on endgames.|
|Apr-11-08|| ||BIDMONFA: Johann Nepomuk Berger|
BERGER, Johann N.
|Apr-11-08|| ||whiteshark: The 'obligatory' links:
|Sep-07-08|| ||GrahamClayton: Berger was also a keen correspondence player, winning the tournament organised by the "Monde Illustre" newspaper in the late 1880's and early 1890's with a final score of +45, =3, -0.|
Source: David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld "Oxford Companion to Chess", 2nd edition, OUP, 1992.
|Apr-11-11|| ||Penguincw: Happy Birthday to Player of the Day.Without going through the games,I think this is his best game,J N Berger vs Marshall, 1905.|
|Apr-11-12|| ||brankat: A prolific and important author.|
|Dec-20-12|| ||thomastonk: Berger published two times a "Schach-Jahrbuch", one for 1892/93 and one for 1898/99. The later one can be found and read at Google books. Does anybody know whether the first one can be read online anywhere?|
|Dec-21-12|| ||Calli: <Thomas> 1893 http://books.google.com/books?id=KB...|
Not sure that it works in every country.
|Dec-21-12|| ||TheFocus: Bachmann did "Schach-Jahrbuch" 1891.
Can also be found at Google Books.
|Dec-22-12|| ||thomastonk: <Calli> Thank you for the link. I am in Germany, and so books after 1870 are not readable there without tricks. Now I will try again, since I know that it has to work somehow.|
<TheFocus> Thank you. I know Bachmann's book, which has not much more in common with Berger's books than the title. The largest chapter of Berger's book from 1898/99 provides addresses, biographies and other information on chess players, problemist etc.
|Dec-24-12|| ||TheFocus: <thomastonk> Yes. I took a look at Bachmann's. Not good in comparison to Berger's.|
|May-17-14|| ||Phony Benoni: <"It was humorously said of Berger that he had conscientious principles against playing for a win, even when he had one, because of his strong conviction that every good game ought to be a draw."> -- Minneapolis Journal, February 3, 1900.|
|Oct-24-14|| ||ljfyffe: ...the first Austrian to win an important international correspondence tournament, the "Monde Illustre 1889-1892"...ICCF Gold 2002.|
|Apr-11-15|| ||redwhitechess: he share the same first and middle name with another Austrian composer
Johann Nepomuk HUmmel
|Jul-22-15|| ||thomastonk: Interesting battle.
[Event "Correspondence game"]
[White "Johann Nepomuk Berger"]
[Black "Fritz Riemann"]
(2 August 1877 - 18 January 1878, DSZ 1878, pages 144-148) 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 d5 4. Bxd5 Qh4+ 5. Kf1 g5 6. Nf3 Qh5 7. h4 Bg7 8. Kf2 g4 9. Ng5 g3+ 10. Ke1 Qxd1+ 11. Kxd1 Nc6 12. Bxc6+ bxc6 13. Nc3 Nf6 14. d3 Nh5 15. Nf3 Bg4 16. Rf1 f5 17. e5 O-O 18. Ne2 Rfe8 19. Bxf4 Nxf4 20. Nxf4 Bxe5 21. Ne2 Bxb2 22. Rb1 Be5 23. Kd2 Bd6 24. Nfg1 c5 25. Nf4 c4 26. Nd5 Kf7 27. d4 Re4 28. Kc3 Ke6 29. Kxc4 Be5 30. c3 c5 31. Nf3 cxd4 32. Ng5+ Kd6 33. Nf7+ Kc6 34. Nb4+ Kd7 35. Kd5 Bf6 36. Nc6 Rc8 37. Rb7+ Rc7 38. Nb8+ Kc8 39. Nd6+ Kd8 40. Nc6+ Kd7 41. Rxc7+ Kxc7 42. Rb1 Re5+ 43. Nxe5 Bxe5 44. Kxe5 d3 45. Rb2 Bd1 46. Rd2 Bc2 47. Nxf5 Kb6 48. Nd4 1-0
Something went wrong for White in the early middlegame, but when both kings marched into the centre, the game became unclear.
After 31.. cxd4
click for larger view
White begun to chase ...
click for larger view
Here Black went wrong with 35.. ♗f6? (better is 35.. ♗c7 and Black's material should count). Now White had 36. ♘c6 , of course. Hard to believe that Black overlooked this simple move with the threat ♖b7+ in a correspondence game!