chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
12th DSB Congress, Munich Tournament

Harry Pillsbury12/15(+9 -0 =6)[games]
Carl Schlechter12/15(+9 -0 =6)[games]
Geza Maroczy12/15(+10 -1 =4)[games]
Amos Burn10.5/15(+9 -3 =3)[games]
Georg Marco10/15(+7 -2 =6)[games]
Wilhelm Cohn8/15(+6 -5 =4)[games]
Heinrich Wolf7.5/15(+6 -6 =3)[games]
David Janowski7.5/15(+6 -6 =3)[games]
Jackson Showalter7.5/15(+7 -7 =1)[games]
Johann Berger7.5/15(+5 -5 =5)[games]
Hermann von Gottschall6.5/15(+5 -7 =3)[games]
Ignatz von Popiel6.5/15(+4 -6 =5)[games]
Alexander Halprin5/15(+2 -7 =6)[games]
Maurice Billecard3/15(+1 -10 =4)[games]
Curt von Bardeleben3/15(+2 -11 =2)[games]
Friedrich G Jakob1.5/15(+1 -13 =1)[games]
*

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
12th DSB Congress, Munich (1900)

Munich, Bavaria, Germany (22 July-18 August 1900)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Score Place/Prize ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 1 Pillsbury • ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 ½ 1 1 1 12 1st-2nd 1000ℳ 2 Schlechter ½ • ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1st-2nd 800ℳ* 3 Maroczy ½ ½ • 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 1 1 12 3rd 600ℳ 4 Burn ½ 0 0 • 1 1 1 ½ 0 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 1 10½ 4th 400ℳ 5 Marco ½ ½ 0 0 • ½ ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 10 5th 300ℳ 6 Cohn 0 ½ 0 0 ½ • 1 0 1 ½ ½ 0 1 1 1 1 8 6th 250ℳ 7 Berger ½ ½ 1 0 ½ 0 • ½ 0 1 1 ½ 0 0 1 1 7½ 7th-8th 87ℳ 50₰ 8 Janowski 0 0 0 ½ 0 1 ½ • 1 1 0 1 0 ½ 1 1 7½ 7th-8th 87ℳ 50₰ 9 Showalter 0 ½ 0 1 0 0 1 0 • 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 7½ 7th-8th 87ℳ 50₰ 10 Wolf 0 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 0 1 • 1 1 ½ 1 1 1 7½ 7th-8th 87ℳ 50₰ 11 Von Popiel 0 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 1 1 0 • 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 6½ 12 Von Gottschall 0 0 ½ 0 0 1 ½ 0 0 0 1 • 1 1 ½ 1 6½ 13 Halprin ½ 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ½ ½ 0 • ½ ½ ½ 5 14 Von Bardeleben 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ½ 0 0 0 0 ½ • 1 0 3 15 Billecard 0 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 • 1 3 16 Jakob 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ½ 1 0 • 1½ ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— * Schlechter received the Silver Cup (Luitpold prize) in lieu of equal cash.


Tie-break matches for first, second, and third places:

1 2 3 4 Score ————————————————————————— Pillsbury 1 1 Maroczy 0 0* ————————————————————————— Pillsbury 0 1 ½ ½ 2 Schlechter 1 0 ½ ½ 2 ————————————————————————— * Maroczy withdrew and settle for 3rd place.


Introduction
The 12th German Chess Federation Congress was held in Munich, German Empire (Bavaria) from July 22nd-August 18th, 1900. It featured several of the world's best players plus the usual gang of cannon fodder, to wit:

Johann Nepomuk Berger, Maurice Billecard, Amos Burn, Wilhelm Cohn, Alexander Halprin, Friedrich G Jakob, David Janowski, Georg Marco, Geza Maroczy, Harry Nelson Pillsbury, Carl Schlechter, Jackson Showalter, Curt von Bardeleben, Hermann von Gottschall, Ignatz von Popiel, Heinrich Wolf.

By round 4 the tournament had developed into a three-way race among Maroczy, Pillsbury and Schlechter, and they stayed there the rest of the way. Janowski was never a factor, Marco kept up for a while but couldn't stand the pace, and Burn made only a mild charge. By round 10, the big three were a full point ahead and it seemed obvious one of them would be the eventual winner.

The plot began to thicken after round 13. Pillsbury had taken his first sole lead at 11.0 points, Maroczy and Schlechter being 1/2-point behind. The latter two were scheduled to play in round 15, and neither could have relished the thought of trying to beat each other in order to catch Pillsbury. It was essential that Pillsbury be slowed down in round 14 to give them a chance to catch up, but he was playing Halprin whose score of 3.5-9.5 didn't inspire much confidence.

What happened next is one of the classic stories. To understand it fully, we need to go back to H Wolf vs Pillsbury, 1900 from round 12:

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.0-0 Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6

In round 3, Maroczy played the quieter 6.Bxc6, and the game was eventually drawn after Pillsbury had the advantage. Wolf goes for a more complicated line, with which Pillsbury was also familiar.

6.dxe5 Nxb5 7.a4 d6 8.e6 fxe6 9.axb5 Ne7

This appears to be an innovation by Pillsbury; previously, 9...Nb8 was played.

10.Nc3 Ng6 11.Ng5 Be7 12.Qh5 Bxg5 13.Bxg5 Qd7


click for larger view

Now Wolf tried <14.Ra3>. This allowed Black to castle safely, beat back a kingside attack and convert his extra pawn in 40 moves.

Maroczy studied the position, and discovered the astounding idea of <14.b6> and 15.<Nd5>, giving White a strong attack. He went over the line with Halprin the night before round 14, hoping to give Pillsbury the surprise of his life.

Pillsbury was probably suspicious as soon as Halprin, who normally played 1.d4, came out with 1.e4 instead. Then when Halprin went into the complicated 6.dxe5 line, the radar was probably on full blast. But 14.b6 and 15.Nd5 were still a total surprise, leaving him facing a dangerous opening innovation with the clock ticking and first place at stake. Despite all this, Pillsbury managed to fend off the attack in what is generally considered one of the greatest draws in chess history.

It wasn't enough to maintain his lead, though, as both Maroczy and Schlechter won to catch Pillsbury. All three played hard in the last round, but draws resulted and the tournament itself ended with a three-way tie for first.

However, there were still tiebreak games to be played. Originally each of the three players were scheduled to have two games with each other. However, Maroczy lost the first game to Pillsbury after a horrible blunder and withdrew due to ill health.

The format was then changed to a four-game mini-match between Pillsbury and Schlechter. Schlechter won the first game, Pillsbury the second, then after two more draws they finally called it a day.

If you're looking for other interesting games, take a glance at Janowski vs Maroczy, 1900 from round 4. The finish is particularly fascinating.

Credit
Original collection: Game Collection: Munich 1900, by User: Phony Benoni.

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 33  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. J Berger vs Janowski ½-½77190012th DSB Congress, MunichD46 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
2. Halprin vs H Wolf ½-½72190012th DSB Congress, MunichD05 Queen's Pawn Game
3. G Marco vs Pillsbury ½-½45190012th DSB Congress, MunichB73 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
4. Showalter vs Schlechter ½-½48190012th DSB Congress, MunichC77 Ruy Lopez
5. Schlechter vs W Cohn ½-½36190012th DSB Congress, MunichD09 Queen's Gambit Declined, Albin Counter Gambit, 5.g3
6. M Billecard vs von Popiel ½-½43190012th DSB Congress, MunichD60 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense
7. Maroczy vs Pillsbury ½-½58190012th DSB Congress, MunichC67 Ruy Lopez
8. J Berger vs G Marco ½-½23190012th DSB Congress, MunichD05 Queen's Pawn Game
9. von Gottschall vs J Berger ½-½11190012th DSB Congress, MunichC28 Vienna Game
10. Halprin vs von Popiel ½-½50190012th DSB Congress, MunichD05 Queen's Pawn Game
11. von Gottschall vs Maroczy ½-½31190012th DSB Congress, MunichB23 Sicilian, Closed
12. W Cohn vs G Marco ½-½35190012th DSB Congress, MunichD00 Queen's Pawn Game
13. F G Jakob vs Halprin ½-½26190012th DSB Congress, MunichC67 Ruy Lopez
14. Schlechter vs Pillsbury ½-½44190012th DSB Congress, MunichD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
15. Halprin vs M Billecard ½-½41190012th DSB Congress, MunichD00 Queen's Pawn Game
16. H Wolf vs Burn ½-½83190012th DSB Congress, MunichC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
17. G Marco vs von Popiel ½-½38190012th DSB Congress, MunichB12 Caro-Kann Defense
18. Burn vs Pillsbury ½-½32190012th DSB Congress, MunichD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
19. von Bardeleben vs Janowski ½-½47190012th DSB Congress, MunichC79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred
20. Maroczy vs von Popiel ½-½63190012th DSB Congress, MunichA03 Bird's Opening
21. Janowski vs Burn ½-½52190012th DSB Congress, MunichC67 Ruy Lopez
22. J Berger vs Schlechter ½-½32190012th DSB Congress, MunichD00 Queen's Pawn Game
23. Halprin vs von Bardeleben ½-½17190012th DSB Congress, MunichD02 Queen's Pawn Game
24. G Marco vs M Billecard ½-½34190012th DSB Congress, MunichC49 Four Knights
25. M Billecard vs von Gottschall ½-½30190012th DSB Congress, MunichD50 Queen's Gambit Declined
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 33  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-27-16  TheFocus: "The prize winners are:

First: Pillsbury and Schlechter split the first prize of 1,000 marks and second prize of 800 marks. Third: Maroczy - 600 marks
Fourth: Burn - 400 marks
Fifth: Marco - 300 marks
Sixth: Cohn - 250 marks
Seventh and eighth: 200 marks and 150 marks split between Berger, Showalter, Janowsky and Wolf

Maroczy received Baron Rothschild's prize, 300 marks, for having won the largest number of games exclusive of draws," - <The Field>, August 18, 190, pg. 233.

Oct-02-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Another very good Tournament intro by User: Phony Benoni, and how characteristic of his oeuvre!
Mar-30-21  Nosnibor: The drawn game between Maroczy and Pillsbury is wrongly ascribed to the Paris 1900 Tournament in Sergeant and Watts book on Pillsbury`s Chess Career.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC