chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

FSR
Member since Aug-27-05 · Last seen Oct-13-25
I am Frederick Rhine. The United States Chess Federation awarded me the titles of National Master (at OTB chess) in 1983, and Senior Master of Correspondence Chess in 1997. In February 2024, less than a year after I began playing in the ICCF, it awarded me the title of Correspondence Chess Master. It looks like later this year I will qualify for the title of International Correspondence Chess Master.

As of September 2025, I am the second highest rated USCF correspondence chess player, just three rating points behind Gordon Magat. https://www.uschess.org/assets/top_...

The August 2020 issue of Chess Life magazine had a profile of me (for the text, see Frederick Rhine (my August 1, 2020 comment in the forum)).

I played in the 1997 USCF Absolute Championship (open to the top 13 correspondence players who accept their invitations), scoring 6-6 (+2 =8 -2). The late Alex Dunne wrote in his book on the Absolute Championships, "This was Rhine's only Absolute and he held his own against the best. His two losses were against previous Absolute winners." http://bit.ly/1NB55YP That book contains my games F Rhine vs R Lifson, 1997 and F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997.

But the 1997 event was not my only Absolute. I have also played in the 2023-25 events. In the 2023 edition, I drew all 12 games. That was enough to tie for second! Unlike the 1997 event, this one was under ICCF auspices and allowed the use of engines. There was only one decisive game! https://www.iccf.com/event?id=101114 In the 2024 Absolute, I have ten draws and a win(!), with just one game left, which will very likely be drawn. https://www.iccf.com/event?id=105325 This time +1 will probably only be enough to tie for fourth. In the 2025 Absolute, I have drawn all twelve games. So far there are no decisive games in the event.

I have played first board for the Rogue Squadron in the Chicago Industrial Chess League. I have played online for the Shropshire & Friends team in the 4 Nations Chess League (4NCL), and the Oswestry team in the Shropshire League.

I attended Lane Technical High School in Chicago with the late Chessgames.com co-founder Alberto A Artidiello until he moved out of Chicago. Lane's chess team won the Illinois state championship my junior and senior years, becoming the first school ever to win consecutive championships. Albert also became a master, as did my teammates Kenneth Mohr and Christopher Kus. The late FIDE Masters Albert Charles Chow and Morris Giles were also Laneites.

In July 2013, I played in my second and third regular-rated tournaments of the millennium(!), the Greater Midwest Classic and the Chicago Class (under-2200 section). I tied for second, undefeated, in both, winning $700 and $550, respectively, and brought my rating back over 2200. http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j... http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j...

I have contributed to hundreds of chess-related articles on Wikipedia under the handle Krakatoa, notably "First-move advantage in chess," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-... "George H. D. Gossip," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George... and "Swindle (chess)," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_..., all of which are almost entirely written by me. The first two of those have been Today's Featured Article, the highest honor a Wikipedia article can receive, one attained by about one out of every 1,400 articles. I have received various Wikipedia awards, including the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels and the Timeless Imperial Triple Crown (which only 12 Wikipedians have received). My user page is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:K.... Al Lawrence in the aforementioned Chess Life article referred to my "erudite chess articles on Wikipedia." Chess historian Edward Winter in his article "Wikipedia and Chess" commended my Wikipedia articles on Gossip and Hugh Edward Myers. (The latter article is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_....) https://www.chesshistory.com/winter...

I am the editor and proofreader of the book "Tournament Battle Plan: Optimize Your Chess Results!" by Daniel Gormally. I was the proofreader of the book "Triple Exclam!!! The Life and Games of Emory Tate, Chess Warrior" by Daaim Shabazz.

I was a contributor to the now-defunct Chicago Chess Blog, http://chicagochess.blogspot.com. I discovered, and documented in my blog post https://chicagochess.blogspot.com/2..., what Taylor Kingston calls "the Mortimer Effect," which has lowered the Morphy Numbers of many modern players (maybe you!). https://chesscafe.com/the-skittles-... I have a Morphy Number of 4 by virtue of L Barden vs F Rhine, 2010 as well as two simul games I lost to Arthur Bisguier when I was in high school.

Six hundred and forty-six of my games are in chessgames.com's database. My favorites are F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981, K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992, and F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996, each of which has been Game of the Day. Rhine-Sprenkle was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 32) and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (2nd ed.) at 183 n.19). In Volume 33 of Chess Informant, my 18th move (18.Nxd6!) in that game was voted the 8th-9th most important theoretical novelty in Volume 32. The game was also cited in MCO-13 and "The Aggressive Nimzowitsch Sicilian 2...Nf6" by Eric Schiller, and occupies an entire chapter in all three editions of "Beating the Sicilian" by John Nunn. It is game 218 in "1000 TN!! The Best Theoretical Novelties" (Chess Informant, 2012). Anish Giri, in his 2023 Chessable course "Lifetime Repertoires: Giri's 1. e4 - Part 3" recommends this line for White. https://www.chessable.com/lifetime-... Following my game against Sprenkle, he writes after 22.Be3, "The computer evaluates this as completely hopeless for Black and it is. Our king is in fact much safer, thanks to our much better pieces." https://www.chessable.com/learn/159... More than 40 years after I played the game, my line still kicks ass!


click for larger view

Thompson-Rhine was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 57), and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (3rd ed.) at 172 n.163). Jeremy Silman discusses the game and my analysis of it in his book "Winning with the Sicilian Defence" (2nd ed.).

Probably the best game I have ever played is the astonishing F Rhine vs B Lemke, 2025, but it's too deep for me to understand. It was an ICCF game and I was greatly assisted by Stockfish 17.1 (which is legal on ICCF). I doubt that any unaided human could have played that game.

Joel Johnson in his book "Attacking 101: Volume #005" says of my blitz game F Rhine vs NN, 2019, "White played a flawless Smith-Morra Gambit that IM Marc Esserman would have been proud of." Georges Koltanowski published F Rhine vs A Artidiello, 1974 in his syndicated newspaper column. Richard Palliser discusses the opening of F Rhine vs S Nagle, 1997 in his book "tango!"

I have played some theoretically significant correspondence games in the Damiano Variation of Petroff's Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 Nxe4!?), demonstrating that Black's third move, commonly regarded as a blunder, is fully playable. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/che... Nikolaos Ntirlis analyzes two of my games in an article on the variation in Volume 158 of Chess Informant. Cyrus Lakdawala and Carsten Hansen include five of my games in their book on the line, "None Shall Pass: The Unbeatable Damiano Petroff: A tricky and surprisingly solid defense."

Jacob Aagaard analyzes the endings of two of my Internet blitz games in his 896-page tome "A Matter of Endgame Technique" (alas, mine was lacking). Cyrus Lakdawala includes my study-like win in F Rhine vs A Zhao, 2019 in his book "Tactical Training in the Endgame." He also mentions me, albeit not by name, in his book "In the Zone: The Greatest Winning Streaks in Chess History" when he refers to "The Classical Sicilian, which as one of my atheist students told me, is the closest thing he has to a religion." Cyrus analyzes my game against Gadir Guseinov in his book "The Makogonov Variation: A ruthless King's Indian killer."

Commentator Mato Jelic somewhat extravagantly calls my game E Sollano vs F Rhine, 1977 "The Greatest Ever Blitz Game Played in Chicago." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl8... See also Suren's analysis at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWa... My 7...Bxc5!! in that game, played the year before Boris Avrukh was born, is a big improvement on the flaccid 7...Bg6, his recommendation in the book "Beating 1.d4 Sidelines" (2012).

Someone also made a video (moves only) of J Aagaard vs F Rhine, 2021, a 2-1 bullet game where I drew and should've beaten the grandmaster - if only I'd had time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-O... Someone else (or perhaps two different people) did a video (moves only) of Tal vs F Rhine, 1988, my loss to the great Mikhail Tal in a simul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfk... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3o... The latter refers to me as a "great grandmaster!" which isn't quite accurate . . .

User: JimmyVermeer discusses my games NN vs F Rhine, 2021, P Pantelidakis vs F Rhine, 1974, and P Napetschnig vs F Rhine, 1977 in his video "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 10 of 11." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GT... The sequel "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 11 of 11," contains a Fool's Mate I played, which I had mentioned in a comment on this site. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0Z... Napetschnig-Rhine is also mentioned in https://www.chess.com/terms/fools-m.... Rick Kennedy discusses my game F Rhine vs NN, 2018 on his Jerome Gambit blog. https://jeromegambit.blogspot.com/2... My game F Rhine vs NN, 2010 is mentioned in the "Checkmate Patterns Course" by Raf Mesotten and John Bartholomew on chessable.com.

I composed this study, which Pal Benko published in "Benko's Bafflers" in Chess Life, May 2006:

White to play and draw


click for larger view

The solution is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stale... It is based on an earlier study of mine, also published in Benko's column. Both compositions also appear in Harold van der Heijden's endgame study database. https://www.chess.com/news/view/76-... The above study is also cited in "The Complete Chess Swindler" by David Smerdon and "Rewire Your Chess Brain: Endgame Studies and Mating Problems to Enhance Your Tactical Ability" by Cyrus Lakdawala.

I was once one of the world's best players at suicide chess (also known as "losing chess"), a chess variant where one wins by giving away all of one's pieces. http://perpetualcheck.com/antichess...

I have successfully submitted 240 puns for Game of the Day. Game Collection: Puns I submitted. User: johnlspouge has remarked, "As far as I can tell, <FSR> is churning out 'actual puns' almost as fast as I can [insert bodily function of choice]." K Tjolsen vs S Marder, 2010. The coveted 2013 Caissar for Best (Worst) Pun went to "Control-Ault-Delete," the pun I submitted for Fischer vs R Ault, 1959, the Game of the Day on December 19, 2012. I won the 2019 Caissar in the same category for my greatest pun ever (and IMO one of the greatest chessgames puns ever) "Late December Back in '63: What a Lady, What a Knight!," N Littlewood vs B Brinck-Claussen, 1963, the Game of the Day on December 30, 2019. Since Caissars are awarded in January, my wins may illustrate recency bias.

Nine of my games have been Game of the Day: NN vs F Rhine, 1977 ("Strangers on a Train"), F Rhine vs F Lasch, 1986 ("Lasch Call"), K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992 ("Like a Rhinestone Cowboy"), R Delaune vs F Rhine, 1997 ("Red Red Rhine"), F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997 ("Fred Rhine Felled"), F Felecan vs F Rhine, 2019 ("Felecan Brief"), F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981 ("Sparkling Rhine"), F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996 ("Das Rhinegold"), and F Rhine vs NN, 2018 ("'Twas the Night Before Christmas"). Six wins, a draw, and two losses.

I am responsible for World Junior Championship (1957), Vidmar Memorial (1969), Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014), Game Collection: Drawing lines, and 32nd Correspondence World Championship (2020), among others. Legendary chess journalist Leonard Barden recently told me in an email, "I follow your many thoughtful contributions to chessgames.com with interest."

I am a member of the ChessBookie Hall of Fame, having finished fourth in the Summer 2015 Leg, seventh in the Winter 2016 Championship Leg, ninth in the Winter 2017 Championship Leg, ninth in the Spring 2017 Leg, and seventh in the Summer 2017 Leg.

I am very active on Chessable, where my handle is "Krakatoa." https://www.chessable.com/profile/K... I am a "Legend" and have 134 badges, five shy of the world record held by Maestro. https://www.chessable.com/badges/Ma...

>> Click here to see FSR's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   FSR has kibitzed 30804 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Oct-13-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
FSR: <HeMateMe: World liberty financial --im pretty sure that the trump family hasn't put up any money of their own. They probably skim 10% off the top, something like that.> Far more than that. <A Trump business entity owns 60 percent of World Liberty, and is entitled to 75 ...
 
   Oct-13-25 FSR chessforum
 
FSR: Submitted: [Event "BRA/CXEB-Open02 6 (BRA)"] [Site "ICCF"] [Date "2025.09.30"] [Round "-"] [White "Frederick Rhine"] [Black "Marcin Kolodziejski"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A13"] [WhiteElo "2349"] [BlackElo "2387"] [Source " ...
 
   Oct-11-25 Portoroz Interzonal (1958)
 
FSR: <avenant69: . . . Fischer, who systematically drew against the top dogs but crushed the lesser ones> Fischer later honed rabbit-bashing to an art form. At the Stockholm Interzonal (1962) , he scored +3=8 against the players who finished 2nd through 12th, but +10=1 against the ...
 
   Oct-11-25 B Gurgenidze vs Klovans, 1959 (replies)
 
FSR: Very sweet. I saw Bxh6, but not the follow-up.
 
   Oct-10-25 M Chan vs F Rhine, 2025 (replies)
 
FSR: <Sally Simpson> I'm not sure.
 
   Oct-10-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
FSR: Wow. The Cubs beat the Brewers 6-0 to tie the series.
 
   Oct-10-25 A Karklins vs G Small, 1986
 
FSR: Karklins is good at trapping queens. The month before, he played A Karklins vs Dlugy, 1986 .
 
   Oct-08-25 Yermolinsky vs Kudrin, 2000
 
FSR: Hard to believe this game. 11.O-O-O?? (the only instance of this move in the database) is madness, and I can't believe that Yermolinsky played it, or that Kudrin failed to win against it. Circa 1980, the young Albert Charles Chow did something very similar against Jammie Gregory, who ...
 
   Oct-08-25 J Engel vs I Zuyev, 2019
 
FSR: An odd little game. Not surprisingly, 11.f4? was never seen again.
 
   Oct-08-25 R Har-Zvi vs N Nikolic, 1993
 
FSR: Probably the moves 6.Nc3 d6 were omitted. It's unlikely that Har-Zvi hung a pawn with 6.Be2? and Nikolic didn't take it.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 17 OF 157 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-09-12  frogbert: it's the "problem" of being in the public, you know - ppl see what you do. it's not like anyone needs to break into anyone's house or private get-together in order to have a look, right? :o)

anyway, i still haven't commented on your play or even the game as such; your own annotation rewarded black's 0-0 with ?? so it's not like you're claiming flawless play of shredder, is it?

have a nice day, and feel free to continue to post on my player page without any explicit invitation to - or to continue giving personal advice without being asked; i'm not bothered by such initiatives, in moderate portions. even comments on my chess games are fine without pre-approval too!

Mar-09-12  Memethecat: <Nemesistic> Here's a game I won against Dasher rated ELO 2000. I was well happy when I did it. Unfortunately it plays virtually the same moves as long as my moves are the same. But it doesn't change the fact that I had to beat it in the first place. You should be proud of your victory. Its like Terminator, we're fighting back against the machines.

1e4 e5 2Nf3 Nf6 3Nxe5 d6 4Nf3 Nxe4
5d4 d5 6Bd3 Be7 7O-O Nc6 8Nc3 Nxc3
9bxc3 O-O 10Bf4 g5 11Bd2 g4 12Bh6 gxf3
13Qxf3 Qd6 14Qh5 Re8 15Bf4 Bf5 16Bxf5 Qg6 17Bxg6 hxg6 18Qxd5 Rad8 19Qb5 Bd6 20Bxd6 Rxd6 21Qxb7 Re7 22Rfe1 Red7 23Re8+ Kg7 24Rae1 Black resigns 1-0

Mar-09-12  hedgeh0g: <Memethecat> Nice game, particularly the sac on f3: that looked quite interesting.

However, I must say I find it hard to believe any computer would play 14...Re8??. I think after 14...f5!, Black is very much still in the game.

Mar-09-12  frogbert: hedgeh0g, when engines are "dumbed down" to play at some specified, approximate level - as memethecat indicates was the case here - then unfortunately most implementations i have seen end up "achieving" that by something like this:

1) play X 'perfect' moves
2) play one terrible move
3) repeat

typically X is the variable that changes depending on the set level.

the problem with the above is that it doesn't resemble how a human 1800, 2000, 2200 etc player plays at all. but it makes the kind of moves (Re8) that you wondered about quite likely from an engine set to some fixed level.

Mar-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <OCF: It's a matter of the religious folk having to pay to facilitate the others doing what the other side thinks is immoral. Surely you can see that?>

<hedge: Are you suggesting that taxpayers should be exempted from contributing to causes they have a moral objection to? >

No.

<Does this mean that if I have a moral objection to war, I'm excused from contributing to the defense budget?>

No.

<Interestingly enough, you don't seem to take issue with religious institutions being tax exempt in the US. Surely this is a perfect example of a cause you agree with being subsidised by people who may object to what it stands for.>

The people of the United States get far more from the religious institutions than the foregone taxes.

Mar-09-12  Colonel Mortimer: <ocf> <The people of the United States get far more from the religious institutions than the foregone taxes.>

Yeah, the rich get to plunder and pillage other nations via religious crusades.

Mar-09-12  Colonel Mortimer: American Jesus...

http://www.dangerousminds.net/image...

Mar-09-12  hedgeh0g: <<hedge: Are you suggesting that taxpayers should be exempted from contributing to causes they have a moral objection to? >

No.

<Does this mean that if I have a moral objection to war, I'm excused from contributing to the defense budget?>

No.>

Would you care to elaborate? Currently, you come across as having a double standard.

<<Interestingly enough, you don't seem to take issue with religious institutions being tax exempt in the US. Surely this is a perfect example of a cause you agree with being subsidised by people who may object to what it stands for.>

The people of the United States get far more from the religious institutions than the foregone taxes.>

This is an extremely presumptuous statement. I'm sure even you might object to the tax-exempt status of Westboro Baptist Church, for instance.

Mar-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <hedge: Would you care to elaborate? Currently, you come across as having a double standard.>

The issue under discussion was not paying taxes. The issue was forcing an educational/religious institution to do something that violated their religious principles. The two options were:

1. Women and/or men would have to pay to accomodate the responsible execution of freely chosen actions.

2. A religious institution would have to give up their religious beliefs.

Is this really a tough call?

<This is an extremely presumptuous statement. I'm sure even you might object to the tax-exempt status of Westboro Baptist Church, for instance.>

I object to their existence, really, but like much free speech, you have to take the bad with the good sometimes. I don't know if <FSR> objects to this conversation here but I am not looking to antagonize.

Mar-09-12  hedgeh0g: I understood your point, but my issue with it was that "religious" beliefs are essentially arbitrary. In principle, any person/institution could object to contributing to something under the pretense of it contradicting their beliefs.

I think you said it best yourself with free speech reference: in a democracy, <you have to take the bad with the good sometimes.>

But you're right: this is a discussion which is probably best left to another (Rogoff) page.

Mar-10-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I "started it" by mistakenly posting here something that I intended for the Rogoff page. Yes, I'd rather have this stuff over there, thank you.
Mar-10-12  Nemesistic: <FSR> I'd just skip any help or annotations you were going to give me on my game i posted, as it seems after the computer played 3...Qg5? The game was over!!! (see previous comments!) Seriously, if you looked at that game, not knowing me/similar rated player played it you'd have to say White played really well (even if black played poor??).. I really like it anyway given who my opponent was.. Next time im posting under another account and username though!.. These guys are like sharks lol
Mar-10-12  brankat: <Nemesistic> Out of curiosity: Have You tried to post this game over at L.Master's forum? And ask for an analysis? That would give him a chance to earn $1.00 :-)
Mar-10-12  Memethecat: <hedgeh0g: <Memethecat> Nice game, particularly the sac on f3: that looked quite interesting.

However, I must say I find it hard to believe any computer would play 14...Re8??. I think after 14...f5!, Black is very much still in the game.>

your right of course, this is set at ELO2000. strangely enough at 1800&1600 it does play f5 but loses to my response g4, instead of taking, it allows me to push to g5, Kh1, & use both Rs on g file. I end up winning even more convincingly. Its sort of my point about playing against computers set at levels, they have a built in "faults".

Mar-10-12  JoergWalter: <Nemesistic>
Until we'll get the input of the <internet's finest analyst> you have to swim with us, the sharks. (<TheFocus> told about the sharks preference of white meat!)

Besides your game there is only <stonehenge>'s link to Pushkarev vs. Sariglar, 2007. I consider your 4.Kf1 better than 4.Qe2 but less energetic than 4.Nf3 which looks best, imo, as Qxg2 is not a real option.

Going backward in your game, I think after 20.Ne4 Qa5 the game is 100% yours. I don't understand blacks attack on your bishop on b3 with a7/a5/a4.

Black's move 15...0-0 is asking for it and should be replaced by d6. 14....Qxb2?.

Do you have any evaluations by Shredder why it wouldn't play 7...Ne3+ (instead of b5)?

Again, keen game on your side making the black queen to perform ~50% of the total moves before dying on e2.

Mar-10-12  Nemesistic: <JW> Thats very kind of you fellow trooper to have a look and give an opinion, and as far as 15...0-0 goes, well its a shocking move for an engine to play, even in my patzer eyes i see that, but what am i supposed to say??

I can guarantee you it'll be another two years before i beat it again though!

Anyway, i really do want AJ to take a look, but he's too miserable at the injustice of his suspension still, to rustle me up a quick webpage, complete with fictional complimentary emails lol

Mar-10-12  King Death: < JoergWalter: <nemesistic> 3.... Qg5 is not in the CG opening explorer. Was it in Shredder's book?>

Here's a game with 3...Qg5.

http://www.365chess.com/view_game.p...

Mar-12-12  Marmot PFL: Wonderful game by black. Half his first 6 moves with the queen, but my favorite move was 16...f6. Imagine the depth of positional understanding that move requires, as black takes the best square from one minor piece while blocking the best diagonal of another. After 17 Nxb5 I figured the rest would be anticlimactic and quit.
Mar-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I just submitted this game to CG.com:

[EventDate "?"]
[Round "7"]
[Result "0-1"]
[White "Robinson Kay Leather"]
[Black "Amos Burn"]
[ECO "C49"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "74"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bb5 Bb4 5. O-O O-O 6. Nd5 Nxd5 7. exd5 e4 8. dxc6 exf3 9. Qxf3 dxc6 10. Be2 Bd6 11. d3 Re8 12. Bd2 Re6 13. Rfe1 Rg6 14. g3 Be6 15. Qg2 Qd7 16. Bf3 Bh3 17. Qh1 Rf8 18. Re2 f5 19. Bh5 f4 20. Bxf4 Rxf4 21. Bxg6 hxg6 22. Re4 Rf8 23. Rae1 Bc5 24. R1e2 Bg4 25. Rxg4 Qxg4 26. Qe4 Qf5 27. Kg2 Qf7 28. f3 Bd6 29. a3 Qd5 30. c3 Rf7 31. Qe8+ Rf8 32. Qe4 Qf5 33. d4 Rf7 34. Qe8+ Kh7 35. Re3 c5 36. Qe4 cxd4 37. cxd4 Re7 0-1

Mar-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: The game was from Amsterdam 1889. I'm pretty sure I filled in the relevant fields.
Mar-19-12  quantum.conscious: <fsr> , i asked you a question at <rogoff> forum , if you have time.

i am reposting it here :

<fsr> , I am right now watching this movie - 'reign over me'. Don cheaddle is a dentist. one of his female patients tells him that she wants to give him blow job. Don spurns her and tell her to find another dentist. as it turns out , that woman sends some legal notice threatening to sue him for sexual assault and dentist is in trouble.

that is just a movie , right? what could that dentist have done differently?

i am asking because in USA , such sexual lawsuits are so common .

so, what do you say about that scenario from that movie?

thanks, <fsr>.

Mar-19-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <quantum.conscious> I often have that problem in my law practice. No, not really. It's a pretty far-fetched scenario, but the dentist seems to have acted appropriately. There is no shortage of frivolous lawsuits. Cf. http://www.ftc.gov/foia/frequentreq... (Federal Trade Commission complaint filed against Sony by nine female fans, alleging that Sony falsely presented singer Clay Aiken as heterosexual, when in fact he is gay).
Mar-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Chessgames.com is an Internet Business chess website with over 173,000 members>

I don't care for that revision. Here's the original:

<Chessgames.com is an Internet chess community with over 173,000 members>

Could you change it back?

Mar-21-12  DrywallRickshaw: Hi there,
I'm a long time chessgames lurker. I just wanted to say that I've always appreciated your kibitzes, especially when you've acted as the voice of reason during a Goldsby tantrum (Those tantrums are better than any sitcom to get a laugh).

I also noticed you said somewhere you were a lawyer. I'm a 1L at Vandy, I was wondering if the legal market was as bad they say on all the blogs/everywhere. I get the feeling I'm going to go from graduation straight to the zombie apocalypse from the walking dead.

Mar-21-12  Memethecat: But the western world is definitely becoming more litigious. In the past 10-15yrs here in the UK, peoples attitudes have changed enormously on the issue of can I get sued for this or that small thing. I honestly saw a bag of peanuts in the supermarket recently with the warning "May contain nuts" that's funny. But the bigger picture is people aren't trusting & helping each other as freely as they once did. That cant be good.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 157)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 17 OF 157 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC