< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 12 OF 12 ·
|Apr-06-14|| ||Conrad93: Nigel Short: better career:
John Nunn: better games.
As far as I am aware, Short didn't take as many risks, which is a good plan in general, but can lead to very boring chess.
|Apr-06-14|| ||N0B0DY: Jabberwocky!|
|Apr-06-14|| ||perfidious: If 'better games' is defined as draws in twenty-five moves or less, <Conrad> is correct:|
Works out to just about 20 per cent. Out great genius <Conrad> can tell us that is <nearly one game in five>.
Kasparov was minus vs Gulko-do you propose to suggest the latter was the stronger player, or had the greater career? Multiple world champions facing Geller? Better explain why Geller was greater than all of them, but never even got a match for the title.
Have your go at it, moronic spambot, but y'all will have to do a bit better'n that.
Short's number of draws in 25 moves or less: 247 of 2470 games played. Ten per cent.
|Apr-06-14|| ||Jim Bartle: Nunn certainly has played many brilliant games (wins and losses), topped by Beliavsky vs Nunn, 1985.|
I guess you could say Short is boring. If you consider plodding your king from g1 to g5 dull: Short vs Timman, 1991
And he has played some great games (and some not so gunder the greatest pressure: Short vs Karpov, 1992 Final, decisive game of a candidates match.
|Apr-06-14|| ||RedShield: <Plus, it seems that Nunn has a huge plus score against Short.>|
It's worth remembering that Short's problem with English chess wasn't confined to Tony Miles.
|Apr-06-14|| ||Conrad93: <Kasparov was minus vs Gulko-do you propose to suggest the latter was the stronger player, or had the greater career? Multiple world champions facing Geller? Better explain why Geller was greater than all of them, but never even got a match for the title.>|
Yep,looks like Gulko is the better player.
|Apr-06-14|| ||Conrad93: The Short-Timman game isn't that great. The king march seems quite obvious. |
Black has no real threats to prevent it from marching to the kingside.
|Apr-06-14|| ||Conrad93: Seems like something that would be played in a skittles game.|
|Apr-06-14|| ||Conrad93: Nunn has a plus score against Micheal Adams also.|
|Apr-06-14|| ||Jim Bartle: <Conrad93: Black has no real threats to prevent it from marching to the kingside.>|
That's the point now, isn't it? He got the position and made the king march that GMs marveled at, and voted it the #1 game in that Informator.
|Apr-06-14|| ||Conrad93: That's a rare game from Short.
Still not as impressive as the Beliavsky-Nunn game.
|Apr-06-14|| ||offramp: The only thing that should be played during a skittles game is skittles.|
|Apr-06-14|| ||perfidious: <offramp> Ah don't play Skittles-Ah eat 'em!!|
|Apr-09-14|| ||Conrad93: The skittles rooms I go to usually have Skittles, so you can do both.|
|Apr-09-14|| ||Conrad93: Yeah, and that Short game is pretty good.
For me it's the lead up to the march, and not the march itself that's impressive.
|Apr-25-14|| ||Marmot PFL: Evidently I share a birthday with a few notable players-|
Bertram Claude Jenkines, Stefan Levitsky, Charles Jaffe, Max Lange, Gyorgy Schiffert, Ferruccio Castiglioni, Albert Sandrin, Egon Joppen, Grigory Grigorievich Krupsky, Robert Gary Cross, Antonas A Cesnauskas, Lisa Lane, Raymond Allen Weinstein, Sven-Goran Malmgren, <John Nunn>, Viktor Komliakov, Jayshree Khadilkar, Luis Galego, Petar Drenchev, Sergei Mihajlovskij, Hoang Thanh Trang, and Sinisa Saric!
|Jun-21-14|| ||RookFile: <As far as I am aware, Short didn't take as many risks >|
Full stop. Try playing over the Short vs. Kasparov match sometime and tell us that Short didn't take risks.
|Nov-14-14|| ||sonia91: Top seed and 3rd at World Senior Championship 2014 (50+ section), held in Katerini, Greece.|
|Feb-16-15|| ||offramp: Dr Nunn's most recent book is his Chess Course. It is based entirely on the games of that other mathematical/chess brainiac Emanuel Lasker. It shows how little Dr Lasker's star has faded!|
|Mar-27-15|| ||The Rocket: I am surprised our great mathematican and problem solver didn't amount to more in chess. He was, after all, european junior champion. The truth is that though top level chess involves heavy calculations, it's not the only factor in determining the very best. Nunn did not evaluate positions well enough. Having gone through some of his more noteable games, I do find his style of play quite appealing. I wouldn't say it was out of the question thath he could have been a top 3 player under optimal conditions.|
|Apr-06-15|| ||whiteshark: John Nunn interview on all and sundry http://chess24.com/en/read/news/joh... (maths, chess, computers and Lasker...)|
|Apr-06-15|| ||The Rocket: <whiteshark> Interesting. So Nunn actually rejects a meaningful connection between Chess and mathematics. I wonder then why the math prodigy was also world champion in <problem solving-chess championships> (coincidence?...).. If such problems were based on pattern recognition <only>, I doubt Nunn would be any better than your average 2600. You cannot excel at insane tactics, without advanced calculations.|
|Apr-06-15|| ||zanzibar: From the interview <whiteshark> ref'ed:|
<In fact Magnus Carlsen, the current World Champion, told me that he doesn’t actually have a chess set at home. He does everything on the computer screen.>
|Apr-28-15|| ||HeMateMe: Nunn turns 60! A blitz tourney at a fine club, w/birthday cake. I recognize three of the people here:|
|Apr-28-15|| ||moronovich: <whiteshark: John Nunn interview on all and sundry http://chess24.com/en/read/news/joh... (maths, chess, computers and Lasker...)>|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 12 OF 12 ·