chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

FSR
Member since Aug-27-05 · Last seen Oct-11-25
I am Frederick Rhine. The United States Chess Federation awarded me the titles of National Master (at OTB chess) in 1983, and Senior Master of Correspondence Chess in 1997. In February 2024, less than a year after I began playing in the ICCF, it awarded me the title of Correspondence Chess Master. It looks like later this year I will qualify for the title of International Correspondence Chess Master.

As of September 2025, I am the second highest rated USCF correspondence chess player, just three rating points behind Gordon Magat. https://www.uschess.org/assets/top_...

The August 2020 issue of Chess Life magazine had a profile of me (for the text, see Frederick Rhine (my August 1, 2020 comment in the forum)).

I played in the 1997 USCF Absolute Championship (open to the top 13 correspondence players who accept their invitations), scoring 6-6 (+2 =8 -2). The late Alex Dunne wrote in his book on the Absolute Championships, "This was Rhine's only Absolute and he held his own against the best. His two losses were against previous Absolute winners." http://bit.ly/1NB55YP That book contains my games F Rhine vs R Lifson, 1997 and F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997.

But the 1997 event was not my only Absolute. I have also played in the 2023-25 events. In the 2023 edition, I drew all 12 games. That was enough to tie for second! Unlike the 1997 event, this one was under ICCF auspices and allowed the use of engines. There was only one decisive game! https://www.iccf.com/event?id=101114 In the 2024 Absolute, I have ten draws and a win(!), with just one game left, which will very likely be drawn. https://www.iccf.com/event?id=105325 This time +1 will probably only be enough to tie for fourth. In the 2025 Absolute, I have drawn all twelve games. So far there are no decisive games in the event.

I have played first board for the Rogue Squadron in the Chicago Industrial Chess League. I have played online for the Shropshire & Friends team in the 4 Nations Chess League (4NCL), and the Oswestry team in the Shropshire League.

I attended Lane Technical High School in Chicago with the late Chessgames.com co-founder Alberto A Artidiello until he moved out of Chicago. Lane's chess team won the Illinois state championship my junior and senior years, becoming the first school ever to win consecutive championships. Albert also became a master, as did my teammates Kenneth Mohr and Christopher Kus. The late FIDE Masters Albert Charles Chow and Morris Giles were also Laneites.

In July 2013, I played in my second and third regular-rated tournaments of the millennium(!), the Greater Midwest Classic and the Chicago Class (under-2200 section). I tied for second, undefeated, in both, winning $700 and $550, respectively, and brought my rating back over 2200. http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j... http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j...

I have contributed to hundreds of chess-related articles on Wikipedia under the handle Krakatoa, notably "First-move advantage in chess," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-... "George H. D. Gossip," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George... and "Swindle (chess)," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_..., all of which are almost entirely written by me. The first two of those have been Today's Featured Article, the highest honor a Wikipedia article can receive, one attained by about one out of every 1,400 articles. I have received various Wikipedia awards, including the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels and the Timeless Imperial Triple Crown (which only 12 Wikipedians have received). My user page is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:K.... Al Lawrence in the aforementioned Chess Life article referred to my "erudite chess articles on Wikipedia." Chess historian Edward Winter in his article "Wikipedia and Chess" commended my Wikipedia articles on Gossip and Hugh Edward Myers. (The latter article is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_....) https://www.chesshistory.com/winter...

I am the editor and proofreader of the book "Tournament Battle Plan: Optimize Your Chess Results!" by Daniel Gormally. I was the proofreader of the book "Triple Exclam!!! The Life and Games of Emory Tate, Chess Warrior" by Daaim Shabazz.

I was a contributor to the now-defunct Chicago Chess Blog, http://chicagochess.blogspot.com. I discovered, and documented in my blog post https://chicagochess.blogspot.com/2..., what Taylor Kingston calls "the Mortimer Effect," which has lowered the Morphy Numbers of many modern players (maybe you!). https://chesscafe.com/the-skittles-... I have a Morphy Number of 4 by virtue of L Barden vs F Rhine, 2010 as well as two simul games I lost to Arthur Bisguier when I was in high school.

Six hundred and forty-four of my games are in chessgames.com's database. My favorites are F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981, K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992, and F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996, each of which has been Game of the Day. Rhine-Sprenkle was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 32) and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (2nd ed.) at 183 n.19). In Volume 33 of Chess Informant, my 18th move (18.Nxd6!) in that game was voted the 8th-9th most important theoretical novelty in Volume 32. The game was also cited in MCO-13 and "The Aggressive Nimzowitsch Sicilian 2...Nf6" by Eric Schiller, and occupies an entire chapter in all three editions of "Beating the Sicilian" by John Nunn. It is game 218 in "1000 TN!! The Best Theoretical Novelties" (Chess Informant, 2012). Anish Giri, in his 2023 Chessable course "Lifetime Repertoires: Giri's 1. e4 - Part 3" recommends this line for White. https://www.chessable.com/lifetime-... Following my game against Sprenkle, he writes after 22.Be3, "The computer evaluates this as completely hopeless for Black and it is. Our king is in fact much safer, thanks to our much better pieces." https://www.chessable.com/learn/159... More than 40 years after I played the game, my line still kicks ass!


click for larger view

Thompson-Rhine was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 57), and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (3rd ed.) at 172 n.163). Jeremy Silman discusses the game and my analysis of it in his book "Winning with the Sicilian Defence" (2nd ed.).

Probably the best game I have ever played is the astonishing F Rhine vs B Lemke, 2025, but it's too deep for me to understand. It was an ICCF game and I was greatly assisted by Stockfish 17.1 (which is legal on ICCF). I doubt that any unaided human could have played that game.

Joel Johnson in his book "Attacking 101: Volume #005" says of my blitz game F Rhine vs NN, 2019, "White played a flawless Smith-Morra Gambit that IM Marc Esserman would have been proud of." Georges Koltanowski published F Rhine vs A Artidiello, 1974 in his syndicated newspaper column. Richard Palliser discusses the opening of F Rhine vs S Nagle, 1997 in his book "tango!"

I have played some theoretically significant correspondence games in the Damiano Variation of Petroff's Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 Nxe4!?), demonstrating that Black's third move, commonly regarded as a blunder, is fully playable. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/che... Nikolaos Ntirlis analyzes two of my games in an article on the variation in Volume 158 of Chess Informant. Cyrus Lakdawala and Carsten Hansen include five of my games in their book on the line, "None Shall Pass: The Unbeatable Damiano Petroff: A tricky and surprisingly solid defense."

Jacob Aagaard analyzes the endings of two of my Internet blitz games in his 896-page tome "A Matter of Endgame Technique" (alas, mine was lacking). Cyrus Lakdawala includes my study-like win in F Rhine vs A Zhao, 2019 in his book "Tactical Training in the Endgame." He also mentions me, albeit not by name, in his book "In the Zone: The Greatest Winning Streaks in Chess History" when he refers to "The Classical Sicilian, which as one of my atheist students told me, is the closest thing he has to a religion." Cyrus analyzes my game against Gadir Guseinov in his book "The Makogonov Variation: A ruthless King's Indian killer."

Commentator Mato Jelic somewhat extravagantly calls my game E Sollano vs F Rhine, 1977 "The Greatest Ever Blitz Game Played in Chicago." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl8... See also Suren's analysis at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWa... My 7...Bxc5!! in that game, played the year before Boris Avrukh was born, is a big improvement on the flaccid 7...Bg6, his recommendation in the book "Beating 1.d4 Sidelines" (2012).

Someone also made a video (moves only) of J Aagaard vs F Rhine, 2021, a 2-1 bullet game where I drew and should've beaten the grandmaster - if only I'd had time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-O... Someone else (or perhaps two different people) did a video (moves only) of Tal vs F Rhine, 1988, my loss to the great Mikhail Tal in a simul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfk... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3o... The latter refers to me as a "great grandmaster!" which isn't quite accurate . . .

User: JimmyVermeer discusses my games NN vs F Rhine, 2021, P Pantelidakis vs F Rhine, 1974, and P Napetschnig vs F Rhine, 1977 in his video "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 10 of 11." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GT... The sequel "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 11 of 11," contains a Fool's Mate I played, which I had mentioned in a comment on this site. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0Z... Napetschnig-Rhine is also mentioned in https://www.chess.com/terms/fools-m.... Rick Kennedy discusses my game F Rhine vs NN, 2018 on his Jerome Gambit blog. https://jeromegambit.blogspot.com/2... My game F Rhine vs NN, 2010 is mentioned in the "Checkmate Patterns Course" by Raf Mesotten and John Bartholomew on chessable.com.

I composed this study, which Pal Benko published in "Benko's Bafflers" in Chess Life, May 2006:

White to play and draw


click for larger view

The solution is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stale... It is based on an earlier study of mine, also published in Benko's column. Both compositions also appear in Harold van der Heijden's endgame study database. https://www.chess.com/news/view/76-... The above study is also cited in "The Complete Chess Swindler" by David Smerdon and "Rewire Your Chess Brain: Endgame Studies and Mating Problems to Enhance Your Tactical Ability" by Cyrus Lakdawala.

I was once one of the world's best players at suicide chess (also known as "losing chess"), a chess variant where one wins by giving away all of one's pieces. http://perpetualcheck.com/antichess...

I have successfully submitted 240 puns for Game of the Day. Game Collection: Puns I submitted. User: johnlspouge has remarked, "As far as I can tell, <FSR> is churning out 'actual puns' almost as fast as I can [insert bodily function of choice]." K Tjolsen vs S Marder, 2010. The coveted 2013 Caissar for Best (Worst) Pun went to "Control-Ault-Delete," the pun I submitted for Fischer vs R Ault, 1959, the Game of the Day on December 19, 2012. I won the 2019 Caissar in the same category for my greatest pun ever (and IMO one of the greatest chessgames puns ever) "Late December Back in '63: What a Lady, What a Knight!," N Littlewood vs B Brinck-Claussen, 1963, the Game of the Day on December 30, 2019. Since Caissars are awarded in January, my wins may illustrate recency bias.

Nine of my games have been Game of the Day: NN vs F Rhine, 1977 ("Strangers on a Train"), F Rhine vs F Lasch, 1986 ("Lasch Call"), K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992 ("Like a Rhinestone Cowboy"), R Delaune vs F Rhine, 1997 ("Red Red Rhine"), F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997 ("Fred Rhine Felled"), F Felecan vs F Rhine, 2019 ("Felecan Brief"), F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981 ("Sparkling Rhine"), F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996 ("Das Rhinegold"), and F Rhine vs NN, 2018 ("'Twas the Night Before Christmas"). Six wins, a draw, and two losses.

I am responsible for World Junior Championship (1957), Vidmar Memorial (1969), Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014), Game Collection: Drawing lines, and 32nd Correspondence World Championship (2020), among others. Legendary chess journalist Leonard Barden recently told me in an email, "I follow your many thoughtful contributions to chessgames.com with interest."

I am a member of the ChessBookie Hall of Fame, having finished fourth in the Summer 2015 Leg, seventh in the Winter 2016 Championship Leg, ninth in the Winter 2017 Championship Leg, ninth in the Spring 2017 Leg, and seventh in the Summer 2017 Leg.

I am very active on Chessable, where my handle is "Krakatoa." https://www.chessable.com/profile/K... I am a "Legend" and have 134 badges, five shy of the world record held by Maestro. https://www.chessable.com/badges/Ma...

>> Click here to see FSR's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   FSR has kibitzed 30781 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Oct-11-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
FSR: <Representative Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) has defended the Capitol Police officer who shot rioter Ashli Babbitt, parting with former President Donald Trump's version of events. Speaking on C-Span for its January 6 Views From the House show, ahead of its Sunday release, Rep. Mullin ...
 
   Oct-11-25 Portoroz Interzonal (1958)
 
FSR: <avenant69: . . . Fischer, who systematically drew against the top dogs but crushed the lesser ones> Fischer later honed rabbit-bashing to an art form. At the Stockholm Interzonal (1962) , he scored +3=8 against the players who finished 2nd through 12th, but +10=1 against the ...
 
   Oct-11-25 B Gurgenidze vs Klovans, 1959 (replies)
 
FSR: Very sweet. I saw Bxh6, but not the follow-up.
 
   Oct-11-25 FSR chessforum
 
FSR: Submitted: [Event "2nd DSM 0-2750 G (BUL)"] [Site "ICCF"] [Date "2025.08.10"] [EventDate "2025.08.10"] [Round "-"] [White "Rhine, Frederick"] [Black "Mondry, Matthias"] [ECO "B31"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [WhiteElo "2349"] [BlackElo "2390"] [Source " ...
 
   Oct-10-25 M Chan vs F Rhine, 2025 (replies)
 
FSR: <Sally Simpson> I'm not sure.
 
   Oct-10-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
FSR: Wow. The Cubs beat the Brewers 6-0 to tie the series.
 
   Oct-10-25 A Karklins vs G Small, 1986
 
FSR: Karklins is good at trapping queens. The month before, he played A Karklins vs Dlugy, 1986 .
 
   Oct-08-25 Yermolinsky vs Kudrin, 2000
 
FSR: Hard to believe this game. 11.O-O-O?? (the only instance of this move in the database) is madness, and I can't believe that Yermolinsky played it, or that Kudrin failed to win against it. Circa 1980, the young Albert Charles Chow did something very similar against Jammie Gregory, who ...
 
   Oct-08-25 J Engel vs I Zuyev, 2019
 
FSR: An odd little game. Not surprisingly, 11.f4? was never seen again.
 
   Oct-08-25 R Har-Zvi vs N Nikolic, 1993
 
FSR: Probably the moves 6.Nc3 d6 were omitted. It's unlikely that Har-Zvi hung a pawn with 6.Be2? and Nikolic didn't take it.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 52 OF 156 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-13-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <perfidious> <WannaBe> I've met Eric Schiller, too, who also posts on here occasionally. He used to live in Chicago.
Feb-18-14  Shams: <Adventures in the French>

Black (me) has just won a pawn and looks to the future with confidence due to his rock on d5 and control of the c-file.


click for larger view

After 1...Rc4 2.g3, Black has a decision to make with his King-- run to the queenside, or stay home at e7 to guard his pawns against a later f4-f5 by White? In the game I chose the latter course, then switched plans when the game wasn't winning itself on the queenside. I later won, but only after first giving the game away.

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game...

Thoughts? By the way I'm amazed how well Black scores after <7...Nb6> in this variation. He can almost close his eyes and play ...a6, ...Bd7 and only then ...c7-c5 and it looks like he is knocking on the door on the queenside while White is still lacing up his boots on the other wing.

Feb-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> I don't claim to be an endgame genius. I would have played 23...Ke7, as you did, but Houdini says that 23... Kd7 is better, evidently because the king can go to the queenside rather than sitting passively on e7. Houdini gives 23...Kd7 24. Rhe1 Rhc8 25. Re2 R8c5 26. Rdd2 Kc6 -1.03. It also doesn't like 25...b4, again to my surprise (it seems logical to exchange off your doubled pawn - but OTOH it's always said that it's in the endgame defender's interest to exchange pawns). It prefers instead 25... Re4 26. Rcd1 Kd7 27. Rd4 Rc4 28. Rxe4 Rxe4 29. Rd3 Re2 30. h4 b6 31. Rb3 Kc6 32. Rc3+ Kb7 33. Rb3 Rg2 -0.77. 26.a4? was a mistake, making the a-pawn vulnerable. Instead, White should have played 26. axb4 Rxb4+ 27. Rb3 Rxb3+ 28. Kxb3 Rc6 29. Ra1 Ra6 30. Rd1 -0.64.

Your 27...Kc6 seems innocuous enough, but surprisingly Houdini says that it's about .8 worse than 27... Ra8 (trying to create the possibility of infiltration with ...Re2 as well as ...Ra8) 28. Ra1 Re4 29. h4 Kc6 30. Rf3 Kc5 31. f5 Rxe5 32. fxe6 f6! -1.4. Your 29...b6 was also a lemon, allowing White to completely equalize. You should have played 29... Rxc3 30. Rxc3+ Kd7 31. Rb3 Rc7 -0.5.

I hope that helps somewhat, although I realize it reflects a lot more insight on Houdini's part than mine.

Feb-19-14  Shams: <FSR> Yes, I was surprised how trying to liquidate my weak pawn backfired. Thanks for weighing in. I was more looking to see if I made any basic errors in positional judgment-- I wouldn't ask you to put things in an engine (I do have Shredder, myself).

I think I'm going to get a fair amount of rook endgame practice, playing the Classical French.

Feb-20-14  hedgeh0g: <FSR> Given your involvement with Wikipedia, I thought I might bring this to your attention.

Take a look at the <locked> article on Mother Teresa and let me know whether or not you think there might be just a smidgeon of bias in there.

Feb-20-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <hedge> Yes, obviously. Some of this crap is addressed on the article's talk page:

<The entire piece is riddled with weasel words. When reference to a criticism is made, it is followed by a dismissal. e.g. "She was depicted as cunning, lacking in modesty and humility; they were either dupes or manipulators. Nor were these criticisms expressed in measured terms. Her critics frequently used vulgar, insulting and abusive language, and even grave allegations of personal impropriety were made against her, dependent on nothing but insinuations and suspicion, guilt by association, and adverse conclusions drawn from her silence. Throughout, Mother Teresa was silent in the face of abuse, and when pressed replied only that she forgave those who attacked her."

This is not how we do things on Wikipedia. Compare it to the criticism sections of other controversial figures. No one would come away from reading this piece well-informed about the body of criticism against Teresa.

I think it would be better that the criticism section reflect much of the evidence against her, with references, without suffixing every sentence with apologia or idolatry. Even the introduction has been skunked: it concludes "she has not lacked detractors, nor was she immune from personal abuse and insults whether in her life or after her death, all of which she bore calmly" Can you imagine the WP intro on Thaksin Shinawatra or George W Bush ending with "all of which he bore calmly"?

We need to move this piece so that it is closer to what an encyclopedia article ought to be.

Ordinary Person (talk) 05:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:... (line breaks added)

This POS was at one time listed as a "Good Article."* It was delisted in 2011.

*As to the significance of that, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip....

Feb-20-14  hedgeh0g: <FSR> My concern is not so much that the article was completely lacking in objectivity (the occasional piece of s*** is an unavoidable consequence of an open platform), but the fact that the article was locked.

What sort of message does this send about the editors supposedly deemed sufficiently trustworthy to bear the responsibility of administrating the site? One can hardly consider Wikipedia a reliable source (and its reliability has increased considerably since its inception) when this sort of thing is allowed to go on.

Feb-20-14  Shams: Don't they typically only lock articles to prevent endless back-and-forth editing wars? I can see locking the climate change page, but the Mother Teresa page? Really?
Feb-20-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: It's not totally locked. If you mouse over the lock, you'll see that it's "semi-protected," so only registered users can edit it. I'm a registered user of course, and anyone can easily become one. I assume that they semi-protected the article because it had a big problem with vandalism from anonymous users.
Feb-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I had a cool, even touching, experience this past evening. I drove out to the site of the U.S. Amateur Team Championship North in Schaumburg, Illinois, not to play, but so I could buy an autographed copy of GM Jesse Kraai 's chess novel <Lisa> from Sevan A Muradian, one of the tournament organizers.

Sevan got me the book, then said to wait, he had someone who wanted to meet me. This was surprising. Sevan went into the tournament room and came out with the man in question. The man told me that he had asked Sevan if I was playing in the tournament, but Sevan had told him that I had not registered. He said he regularly played over the POTDs ("Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, maybe Thursday") on chessgames.com, but had never commented. He said that he thought it was terrible that some people were very rude to the other commenters, but he always saw my comments on the POTD, and I was always polite. He said he was honored to meet me. I asked about him, and he said that he was Vladimir Djordjevic, and was 78. What a nice man!

Feb-27-14  Shams: <FSR> With regard to Keene, I alternate between being surprised that more people don't care and surprised that anybody cares at all. Though the scope of his plagiarism is impressive, at the end of the day it's a tempest in a teapot. I'm reminded of Kissinger's famous slap at academia: "the infighting is so vicious because the stakes are so small." I doubt anybody's book sales or reputation (apart from Keene's himself) has been hurt by any of this.

I still can't believe the Telegraph hasn't canned him, though. That's the part that bothers me: there are so few paid gigs in chess, and you're going to give one to a guy who can't be bothered to put in the time? Surely a young British IM could do a much, much better job. Why not line his or her pockets instead?

Actually, I was slightly annoyed that the Penguin blocked me. He's been good enough to answer a couple of my questions over the years.

Feb-27-14  Shams: I just got accused of being a program for finding (in a 15/10 game no less!) a shot that exploits White's weak last move, Nd3-f2. Amazing. (The accusation that is, not the move.)


click for larger view

I honestly don't think I've *ever* played a cheater on chess.com. But some people see them around every corner.

Feb-27-14  Jim Bartle: Knowing there's a strong move waiting, I'd say ...Bxf4.
Feb-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: If you played Qb6, I might be suspicious.
Feb-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: FWIW, I immediately went for Bxf4 like <JB> , especially with that now undefended e1 square, and didn't notice the tactical shot that is probably better.
Feb-27-14  Shams: I played Bxf4. Is there a better move? I just thought it amusing that a monday/tuesday level shot earns one the accusation of cheater.
Feb-27-14  Jim Bartle: Well, I saw it pretty quickly, although the knowledge there's a winning move is a big help. If I see it, it's not a deep "computer move."

White had taken one piece's protection of the f4 pawn, and also taken away the only escape square for the king by moving the knight to d2. Those are just invitations to look for an overloaded piece or a back-row mate.

Feb-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> I confess that I initially dismissed ...Bxf4!, and only after a minute or two realized that oh yes, it's strong. And despite my temporary blindness, I agree - it's not exactly "Game of the Century" material. Probably a near-beginner who'd been reading <Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess> could have found it. If your opponent accuses you of cheating for <that>, he must be accusing a whole lot of opponents of cheating. "OMG, you played the Légal Trap! Cheater!"
Feb-27-14  Shams: <JB><If I see it, it's not a deep "computer move.">

This is my thinking precisely. I could also point to my *thousands* of losses online as evidence that I'm not an engine. But there will always be people who think that you only turn on the engine <against them>, which is surely personality disorder territory.

Feb-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> If you were a computer, you'd have a gaudy rating like 2700 or some such and never make tactical blunders. As you say, the claim only makes sense if you just decided to use a computer against that one guy for some strange reason.
Feb-27-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: The computer move <is> Qb6.
Feb-28-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> <OCF> wasn't kidding. Although at first glance Houdini 3 likes 1...Bxf4, it prefers 1...Qb6 after a few seconds.

(a) 1...Qb6! 2.Nd1 (2.Qxb6 Nxb6 3.Nd1 Nd5 4. Bf2 Bxf4) 2...Qa6 3.Rf1 Nb6 4.Bf2 Nc4 5.Qd3 Bxf4 6.b3 Nd6 7.Qxa6 bxa6 8.g3 Bd2 9.a3 Kg8 10.Ra2 Ba5 -1.20.

(b) 1...Bxf4!? 2.Ng4 Bg5 (looks strange, I know) 3.Bxg5 fxg5 4.Rd1 a5 5.Rff1 a4 6.Qc4 R2e4! (6...Rxb2?! 7.Qf7! Qd8 8.Rde1 Rxe1 9.Rxe1 Nf8 10.d5! h5! 11.Re8 Rb1+ 12.Kf2 Rb2+ leads to a bizarre draw by perpetual in all lines, for example 13. Kg3 Qd6+ 14. Ne5 Qa3+ 15. Nf3 Qd6+) 7.Nf2 b5 8.Qb4 Re2 -0.89.

Conclusion: either you weren't using a computer to find your moves, or if you were, you didn't let it "think" long enough. If you're going to cheat, do it right!

Feb-28-14  hedgeh0g: There's certainly no shortage of idiots on chess.com, as evidenced by the following gem someone posted on my profile a while back:

<hacks time forcing minutes to become seconds>

How can anyone take these people seriously?

Feb-28-14  Shams: Interesting. I was looking at Qb6 in other lines, because I thought he might have a chance to trap my rook.

------------

Here, if we're going to look at one of my games, this one is far more interesting. It's an ongoing correspondence game, so please no feedback on the final position. I have the Black pieces. <1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e5 Nfd7 6.h4>:


click for larger view

The dangerous Alekhine-Chatard Attack. I've played this position 100+ times from the White side, but only about three from the Black side. I've just now taken up the French and am following Moskalenko's recommendation here. Black's sixth move is quite rare and simply looks crazy, but it's playable.

<6....0-0!?!?> (the Spielmann Variation) <7.Bh3 c5 8.Qh5> (8.Nh3 ∆ Bxh7 is an alternative but 8...g6 9.Bh6 cd is a very promising exchange sacrifice) <8...g6 9.Qh6 Nc6> ("the only move to keep playing" -- Moskalenko) <10.f4 Nxd4>:


click for larger view

Now 11.Nf3 or 11.0-0-0 are probably White's best. My opponent chose a natural-looking way to continue the attack, playing right into the teeth of Moskalenko's given refutation. The next sequence of moves was basically blitzed out:

<11.h5 Bxg5 12.fxg5 Qe7 13.hxg6 fxg6 14.Bxg6 hxg6 15.Qh8+ Kf7 16.Rh7+ Ke8 17.Rxe7+ Kxe7 18.Qg7+ Rf7 19.Qxg6 Nxe5>:


click for larger view

...which Moskalenko annotates as: <" , favouring Black")>. Now, you'd think it'd be fun to play a position that a GM says simply favors you, but I'm suddenly on my own and I feel only pressure to squeeze the justified win out of the position. It's complicated! The g-pawn and the Queen are dangerous. White has an annoying Nb5+ in some lines where I run my king over. Sure, my opponent is not a fish and wouldn't have gone for this if it were simply dead lost. But still, I want it to be smoother sailing, darnit. I just don't think I'm cut out for correspondence chess.

After much deliberation, I have snarfed the Ra1 in the corner: <20.Qh6 Nxc2+ 21.Kd2 Nxa1 22.g6>. And that's where things are now. Again, no hints please. But if there's interest I'll post the game when it's over, probably in a week or two.

Feb-28-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Crazy stuff! (About all I can say under the circumstances.)

<hedgeh0g> Crazy stuff! I had no idea you were a Time Lord!

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 156)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 52 OF 156 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC