chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

FSR
Member since Aug-27-05 · Last seen Oct-11-25
I am Frederick Rhine. The United States Chess Federation awarded me the titles of National Master (at OTB chess) in 1983, and Senior Master of Correspondence Chess in 1997. In February 2024, less than a year after I began playing in the ICCF, it awarded me the title of Correspondence Chess Master. It looks like later this year I will qualify for the title of International Correspondence Chess Master.

As of September 2025, I am the second highest rated USCF correspondence chess player, just three rating points behind Gordon Magat. https://www.uschess.org/assets/top_...

The August 2020 issue of Chess Life magazine had a profile of me (for the text, see Frederick Rhine (my August 1, 2020 comment in the forum)).

I played in the 1997 USCF Absolute Championship (open to the top 13 correspondence players who accept their invitations), scoring 6-6 (+2 =8 -2). The late Alex Dunne wrote in his book on the Absolute Championships, "This was Rhine's only Absolute and he held his own against the best. His two losses were against previous Absolute winners." http://bit.ly/1NB55YP That book contains my games F Rhine vs R Lifson, 1997 and F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997.

But the 1997 event was not my only Absolute. I have also played in the 2023-25 events. In the 2023 edition, I drew all 12 games. That was enough to tie for second! Unlike the 1997 event, this one was under ICCF auspices and allowed the use of engines. There was only one decisive game! https://www.iccf.com/event?id=101114 In the 2024 Absolute, I have ten draws and a win(!), with just one game left, which will very likely be drawn. https://www.iccf.com/event?id=105325 This time +1 will probably only be enough to tie for fourth. In the 2025 Absolute, I have drawn all twelve games. So far there are no decisive games in the event.

I have played first board for the Rogue Squadron in the Chicago Industrial Chess League. I have played online for the Shropshire & Friends team in the 4 Nations Chess League (4NCL), and the Oswestry team in the Shropshire League.

I attended Lane Technical High School in Chicago with the late Chessgames.com co-founder Alberto A Artidiello until he moved out of Chicago. Lane's chess team won the Illinois state championship my junior and senior years, becoming the first school ever to win consecutive championships. Albert also became a master, as did my teammates Kenneth Mohr and Christopher Kus. The late FIDE Masters Albert Charles Chow and Morris Giles were also Laneites.

In July 2013, I played in my second and third regular-rated tournaments of the millennium(!), the Greater Midwest Classic and the Chicago Class (under-2200 section). I tied for second, undefeated, in both, winning $700 and $550, respectively, and brought my rating back over 2200. http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j... http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j...

I have contributed to hundreds of chess-related articles on Wikipedia under the handle Krakatoa, notably "First-move advantage in chess," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-... "George H. D. Gossip," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George... and "Swindle (chess)," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_..., all of which are almost entirely written by me. The first two of those have been Today's Featured Article, the highest honor a Wikipedia article can receive, one attained by about one out of every 1,400 articles. I have received various Wikipedia awards, including the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels and the Timeless Imperial Triple Crown (which only 12 Wikipedians have received). My user page is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:K.... Al Lawrence in the aforementioned Chess Life article referred to my "erudite chess articles on Wikipedia." Chess historian Edward Winter in his article "Wikipedia and Chess" commended my Wikipedia articles on Gossip and Hugh Edward Myers. (The latter article is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_....) https://www.chesshistory.com/winter...

I am the editor and proofreader of the book "Tournament Battle Plan: Optimize Your Chess Results!" by Daniel Gormally. I was the proofreader of the book "Triple Exclam!!! The Life and Games of Emory Tate, Chess Warrior" by Daaim Shabazz.

I was a contributor to the now-defunct Chicago Chess Blog, http://chicagochess.blogspot.com. I discovered, and documented in my blog post https://chicagochess.blogspot.com/2..., what Taylor Kingston calls "the Mortimer Effect," which has lowered the Morphy Numbers of many modern players (maybe you!). https://chesscafe.com/the-skittles-... I have a Morphy Number of 4 by virtue of L Barden vs F Rhine, 2010 as well as two simul games I lost to Arthur Bisguier when I was in high school.

Six hundred and forty-four of my games are in chessgames.com's database. My favorites are F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981, K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992, and F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996, each of which has been Game of the Day. Rhine-Sprenkle was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 32) and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (2nd ed.) at 183 n.19). In Volume 33 of Chess Informant, my 18th move (18.Nxd6!) in that game was voted the 8th-9th most important theoretical novelty in Volume 32. The game was also cited in MCO-13 and "The Aggressive Nimzowitsch Sicilian 2...Nf6" by Eric Schiller, and occupies an entire chapter in all three editions of "Beating the Sicilian" by John Nunn. It is game 218 in "1000 TN!! The Best Theoretical Novelties" (Chess Informant, 2012). Anish Giri, in his 2023 Chessable course "Lifetime Repertoires: Giri's 1. e4 - Part 3" recommends this line for White. https://www.chessable.com/lifetime-... Following my game against Sprenkle, he writes after 22.Be3, "The computer evaluates this as completely hopeless for Black and it is. Our king is in fact much safer, thanks to our much better pieces." https://www.chessable.com/learn/159... More than 40 years after I played the game, my line still kicks ass!


click for larger view

Thompson-Rhine was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 57), and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (3rd ed.) at 172 n.163). Jeremy Silman discusses the game and my analysis of it in his book "Winning with the Sicilian Defence" (2nd ed.).

Probably the best game I have ever played is the astonishing F Rhine vs B Lemke, 2025, but it's too deep for me to understand. It was an ICCF game and I was greatly assisted by Stockfish 17.1 (which is legal on ICCF). I doubt that any unaided human could have played that game.

Joel Johnson in his book "Attacking 101: Volume #005" says of my blitz game F Rhine vs NN, 2019, "White played a flawless Smith-Morra Gambit that IM Marc Esserman would have been proud of." Georges Koltanowski published F Rhine vs A Artidiello, 1974 in his syndicated newspaper column. Richard Palliser discusses the opening of F Rhine vs S Nagle, 1997 in his book "tango!"

I have played some theoretically significant correspondence games in the Damiano Variation of Petroff's Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 Nxe4!?), demonstrating that Black's third move, commonly regarded as a blunder, is fully playable. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/che... Nikolaos Ntirlis analyzes two of my games in an article on the variation in Volume 158 of Chess Informant. Cyrus Lakdawala and Carsten Hansen include five of my games in their book on the line, "None Shall Pass: The Unbeatable Damiano Petroff: A tricky and surprisingly solid defense."

Jacob Aagaard analyzes the endings of two of my Internet blitz games in his 896-page tome "A Matter of Endgame Technique" (alas, mine was lacking). Cyrus Lakdawala includes my study-like win in F Rhine vs A Zhao, 2019 in his book "Tactical Training in the Endgame." He also mentions me, albeit not by name, in his book "In the Zone: The Greatest Winning Streaks in Chess History" when he refers to "The Classical Sicilian, which as one of my atheist students told me, is the closest thing he has to a religion." Cyrus analyzes my game against Gadir Guseinov in his book "The Makogonov Variation: A ruthless King's Indian killer."

Commentator Mato Jelic somewhat extravagantly calls my game E Sollano vs F Rhine, 1977 "The Greatest Ever Blitz Game Played in Chicago." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl8... See also Suren's analysis at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWa... My 7...Bxc5!! in that game, played the year before Boris Avrukh was born, is a big improvement on the flaccid 7...Bg6, his recommendation in the book "Beating 1.d4 Sidelines" (2012).

Someone also made a video (moves only) of J Aagaard vs F Rhine, 2021, a 2-1 bullet game where I drew and should've beaten the grandmaster - if only I'd had time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-O... Someone else (or perhaps two different people) did a video (moves only) of Tal vs F Rhine, 1988, my loss to the great Mikhail Tal in a simul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfk... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3o... The latter refers to me as a "great grandmaster!" which isn't quite accurate . . .

User: JimmyVermeer discusses my games NN vs F Rhine, 2021, P Pantelidakis vs F Rhine, 1974, and P Napetschnig vs F Rhine, 1977 in his video "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 10 of 11." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GT... The sequel "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 11 of 11," contains a Fool's Mate I played, which I had mentioned in a comment on this site. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0Z... Napetschnig-Rhine is also mentioned in https://www.chess.com/terms/fools-m.... Rick Kennedy discusses my game F Rhine vs NN, 2018 on his Jerome Gambit blog. https://jeromegambit.blogspot.com/2... My game F Rhine vs NN, 2010 is mentioned in the "Checkmate Patterns Course" by Raf Mesotten and John Bartholomew on chessable.com.

I composed this study, which Pal Benko published in "Benko's Bafflers" in Chess Life, May 2006:

White to play and draw


click for larger view

The solution is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stale... It is based on an earlier study of mine, also published in Benko's column. Both compositions also appear in Harold van der Heijden's endgame study database. https://www.chess.com/news/view/76-... The above study is also cited in "The Complete Chess Swindler" by David Smerdon and "Rewire Your Chess Brain: Endgame Studies and Mating Problems to Enhance Your Tactical Ability" by Cyrus Lakdawala.

I was once one of the world's best players at suicide chess (also known as "losing chess"), a chess variant where one wins by giving away all of one's pieces. http://perpetualcheck.com/antichess...

I have successfully submitted 240 puns for Game of the Day. Game Collection: Puns I submitted. User: johnlspouge has remarked, "As far as I can tell, <FSR> is churning out 'actual puns' almost as fast as I can [insert bodily function of choice]." K Tjolsen vs S Marder, 2010. The coveted 2013 Caissar for Best (Worst) Pun went to "Control-Ault-Delete," the pun I submitted for Fischer vs R Ault, 1959, the Game of the Day on December 19, 2012. I won the 2019 Caissar in the same category for my greatest pun ever (and IMO one of the greatest chessgames puns ever) "Late December Back in '63: What a Lady, What a Knight!," N Littlewood vs B Brinck-Claussen, 1963, the Game of the Day on December 30, 2019. Since Caissars are awarded in January, my wins may illustrate recency bias.

Nine of my games have been Game of the Day: NN vs F Rhine, 1977 ("Strangers on a Train"), F Rhine vs F Lasch, 1986 ("Lasch Call"), K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992 ("Like a Rhinestone Cowboy"), R Delaune vs F Rhine, 1997 ("Red Red Rhine"), F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997 ("Fred Rhine Felled"), F Felecan vs F Rhine, 2019 ("Felecan Brief"), F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981 ("Sparkling Rhine"), F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996 ("Das Rhinegold"), and F Rhine vs NN, 2018 ("'Twas the Night Before Christmas"). Six wins, a draw, and two losses.

I am responsible for World Junior Championship (1957), Vidmar Memorial (1969), Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014), Game Collection: Drawing lines, and 32nd Correspondence World Championship (2020), among others. Legendary chess journalist Leonard Barden recently told me in an email, "I follow your many thoughtful contributions to chessgames.com with interest."

I am a member of the ChessBookie Hall of Fame, having finished fourth in the Summer 2015 Leg, seventh in the Winter 2016 Championship Leg, ninth in the Winter 2017 Championship Leg, ninth in the Spring 2017 Leg, and seventh in the Summer 2017 Leg.

I am very active on Chessable, where my handle is "Krakatoa." https://www.chessable.com/profile/K... I am a "Legend" and have 134 badges, five shy of the world record held by Maestro. https://www.chessable.com/badges/Ma...

>> Click here to see FSR's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   FSR has kibitzed 30788 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Oct-11-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
FSR: Hennepin County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Andrew Baker ruled Floyd's death a homicide. He concluded that the actions of Chauvin and the other police officers were the primary cause of Floyd's death. <George Floyd’s heart disease and use of fentanyl were contributing factors to his
 
   Oct-11-25 Portoroz Interzonal (1958)
 
FSR: <avenant69: . . . Fischer, who systematically drew against the top dogs but crushed the lesser ones> Fischer later honed rabbit-bashing to an art form. At the Stockholm Interzonal (1962) , he scored +3=8 against the players who finished 2nd through 12th, but +10=1 against the ...
 
   Oct-11-25 B Gurgenidze vs Klovans, 1959 (replies)
 
FSR: Very sweet. I saw Bxh6, but not the follow-up.
 
   Oct-11-25 FSR chessforum
 
FSR: Submitted: [Event "2nd DSM 0-2750 G (BUL)"] [Site "ICCF"] [Date "2025.08.10"] [EventDate "2025.08.10"] [Round "-"] [White "Rhine, Frederick"] [Black "Mondry, Matthias"] [ECO "B31"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [WhiteElo "2349"] [BlackElo "2390"] [Source " ...
 
   Oct-10-25 M Chan vs F Rhine, 2025 (replies)
 
FSR: <Sally Simpson> I'm not sure.
 
   Oct-10-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
FSR: Wow. The Cubs beat the Brewers 6-0 to tie the series.
 
   Oct-10-25 A Karklins vs G Small, 1986
 
FSR: Karklins is good at trapping queens. The month before, he played A Karklins vs Dlugy, 1986 .
 
   Oct-08-25 Yermolinsky vs Kudrin, 2000
 
FSR: Hard to believe this game. 11.O-O-O?? (the only instance of this move in the database) is madness, and I can't believe that Yermolinsky played it, or that Kudrin failed to win against it. Circa 1980, the young Albert Charles Chow did something very similar against Jammie Gregory, who ...
 
   Oct-08-25 J Engel vs I Zuyev, 2019
 
FSR: An odd little game. Not surprisingly, 11.f4? was never seen again.
 
   Oct-08-25 R Har-Zvi vs N Nikolic, 1993
 
FSR: Probably the moves 6.Nc3 d6 were omitted. It's unlikely that Har-Zvi hung a pawn with 6.Be2? and Nikolic didn't take it.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 37 OF 156 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-09-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <OCF> Thanks. I tried hard to get the diagrams right, but obviously didn't quite succeed. Your suggestion on how to proceed after 14...Qc6 looks good. The move definitely would have flustered me, though. My friend David Franklin played Bungo in the next round, got a crushing position against Bungo's Richter-Veresov, then hung a pawn and eventually managed to lose. Sad. Chess is a hard game. You have to be eternally vigilant.
Jul-09-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <JoergWalter> Here you go. I just submitted the following game:

[Event "blitz"]
[Site "New York"]
[Date "1963.??.??"]
[EventDate "?"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Asa Hoffmann"]
[Black "Robert James Fischer"]
[ECO "C52"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4 Bxb4 5.c3 Ba5 6.d4 exd4 7.O-O dxc3 8.Qb3 Qf6 9.e5 Qg6 10.Nxc3 Nge7 11.Ba3 O-O 12.Rad1 Re8 13.Ne4 h6 14.Ng3 Bb6 15.Nh4 Qg5 16.Bxf7+ Kf8 17.Ng6+ 1-0

Source: Asa Hoffmann, Chess Gladiator, p. 2.

Jul-09-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: The a3/Qc2 couplet was a really nice continuation. Not apparent at first why they work together.
Jul-09-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <OCF> Yes, chess is a weird game. The first time one sees 4.a3 it looks like a beginner's move.
Jul-09-13  Zorts: Congrats! Nice show old boy. Looking forward too seeing the miniature.
Jul-09-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Zorts> Thanks! I already posted the miniature. See my two-part post earlier today on Rhine-Bungo.
Jul-09-13  Zorts: Thanks, I'll add it to my collection of minis.
Jul-09-13  TheFocus: Here are Hoffman's notes to his game with Fisher.

Hoffman – Fischer
Evans’ Gambit
New York 1963

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. d4 exd4 7. O-O dxc3

<This is the Compromised Defense. Fischer studied all of the nineteenth century games, and enjoyed testing his defensive skills in some difficult variations.>

8. Qb3 Qf6 9. e5 Qg6 10. Nxc3 Nge7

<10…Bxc3 leaves Black very weak on the dark squares.>

11. Ba3 O-O 12. Rad1 Re8

<A well known position, to devotees of the Evans Gambit, that is! Usually played now is 13. Bd3 and White has normal compensation.>

13. Ne4!

<Fischer looked at this move with some suspicion! Could this be the latest Russian analysis? The move, in fact, is given in <Common Sense in Chess> by Emanuel Lasker. The continuation given is 13…Qxe4 14. Bxf7+ Kf8 15. Bg8 d5 16. exd6 Nxg8 17. Ng5 Qg6 18. Qf7+! Qxf7 19. Nxh7 mate.>

13…h6 14. Ng3 Bb6?

<14…Rf8 15. Bd5 wins an Exchange. The most interesting try, in the true spirit of the opening, was 14…b5!.>

15. Nh4 Qg5 16. Bxf7+ Kf8 17. Ng6 mate 1-0.

Jul-10-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I wrote a post on the Chicago Chess Blog about my game against Bungo. http://chicagochess.blogspot.com/20...
Jul-10-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Incidentally, Bungo is visible in the picture accompanying Frederick Rhine - on the right wearing an orange shirt.
Jul-10-13  hedgeh0g: <FSR> Nice game. I haven't had the time to look into it in detail, but I will mention that I occasionally employ the Fajarowicz as a Blitz weapon, so my comments are based largely on personal experience.

I believe 4.a3! to be White's strongest response, enabling him to hang on to the pawn (without this move, Black often retains the option of playing some combination of Nc6, Bb4+ and Qe7 to regain the pawn with a solid position.

I think 4...d6 is slightly more accurate than the immediate 4...Nc6 after a3, since White can potentially fall for the exd6 Bxd6 Nf3? Nxf2! trap.

After 5.Qc2, I typically play 5...Nc5 to generate some sharper play. After 6.b4 Ne6 7.Bb2 dxe5 8.Nxe5, I think Black can try 8...Ned4 (8...Ncd4?! 9.Qe4!).

Objectively, this is a dubious line, but it is trappy and careless players can easily get caught out in the tactics.

Jul-19-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Not a perfect game, but I submitted it:

[Event "Greater Midwest Classic"]
[Site "Rosemont, IL"]
[Date "2013.07.06"]
[EventDate "2013.07.05"]
[Round "4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Frederick Rhine"]
[Black "Gregory Bungo"]
[ECO "A51"]
[WhiteElo "2185"]
[BlackElo "2000"]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ne4 4.a3 d6 5.Qc2 d5 6.cxd5 Qxd5 7.Nc3 Nxc3 8.Qxc3 Nc6 9.Bf4 Bf5 10.Rd1 Qe4 11.e3 Nb4 12.f3 Nc2+ 13.Kf2 Qa4 14.b3 Qxa3 15.Bb5+ c6 16.Bxc6+ Ke7 17.Bxb7 Rd8 18.Bg5+ f6 19.exf6+ Kf7 20.Rxd8 1-0

Jul-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Just submitted this game:

[Event "2010 Chicago Open"]
[Site "Chicago"]
[Date "2010.??.??"]
[EventDate "2010.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Erik Karklins"]
[Black "Joe Damocles"]
[ECO "B17"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]

1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nd7 5.Nf3 Ndf6 6.Ng3 e6 7.Bc4 Bd6 8.0–0 Ne7 9.Bg5 Ned5 10.Nh5 0–0 11.Bxd5 exd5 12.Bxf6 gxf6 13.Qd2 Bg4 14.Qh6 Bxh5 15.Qxh5 Qd7 16.Nh4 Kh8 17.Nf5 Rg8 18.f4 Rg6 19.Rf3 Rag8 20.Qxh7+ 1-0

Jul-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Another:

[Event "?"]
[Site "Chicago"]
[Date "1975.??.??"]
[EventDate "1975.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Erik Karklins"]
[Black "Craig Chellstorp"]
[ECO "B99"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Be7 8.Qf3 h6 9.Bh4 Qc7 10.0–0–0 Nbd7 11.Bd3 Rg8 12.Bg3 b5 13.e5 Bb7 14.Qe2 dxe5 15.f5 b4 16.Ne4 Bd5 17.fxe6 fxe6 18.Nxf6+ gxf6 19.Qh5+ Kd8 20.Be4 Rxg3 21.Bxd5 exd4 22.Bxa8 b3 23.axb3 Rxb3 24.Rxd4 Ba3 25.Rxd7+ Qxd7 26.cxb3 Bxb2+ 27.Kxb2 Qd2+ 28.Ka3 Qd6+ 29.Ka4 1–0

Jul-23-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Submitted:

[Event "U.S. Open"]
[Site "Chicago"]
[Date "1994.??.??"]
[EventDate "1994.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Albert Chow"]
[Black "Robert Byrne"]
[ECO "E77"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. Nge2 e5 7. d5 Nd4 8. Nxd4 exd4 9. Ne2 O‑O 10. O‑O Re8 11. Ng3 c5 12. h3 a6 13. Bd2 Bd7 14. a4 Rb8 15. b4 cxb4 16. Bxb4 Qb6 17. Qd2 Bc8 18. a5 Qc7 19. Qf4 Re5 20. Qc1 Nd7 21. Qa3 Bf8 22. Ne2 Nc5 23. f3 f5 24. Nxd4 fxe4 25. fxe4 Bd7 26. Bxc5 dxc5 27. Nf3 Rbe8 28. Nxe5 Qxe5 29. Rxf8 Rxf8 30. Rf1 Qd4 31. Kh2 Qe3 32. Rxf8 Kxf8 33. Qc3 Kg8 34. Qc2 Kf7 35. Qe2 Qxe2 36. Bxe2 Kf6 37. Kg3 Ke5 38. Kf3 Ba4 39. Ke3 h5 40. h4 Be8 41. Bd1 Bd7 42. Bc2 Be8 43. Bb3 Bd7 44. Ba2 Ba4 45. Bb1 Bb3 46. Bd3 Ba4 47. Bf1 Be8 48. g3 Ba4 49. Bh3 Bb3 50. Kd3 Kd6 51. Bc8 Kc7 52. Be6 b6 53. axb6 Kxb6 54. Kc3 Bd1 55. Bf7 a5 56. e5 Kc7 57. Bxg6 a4 58. Bc2 1-0

Jul-25-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: PART ONE

Chicago Class, Expert Section
July 21, 2013
Frederick Rhine (2189)-John Krom (2128) Round 5

This game was played in the last round. Three players had 3.5/4 going into this round, including Vladimir Skavych and Daniel Farah, both of whom had drawn me and won their other games. Krom and I were among a large group a half point behind at 3/4.

<1.d4 Nf6 2.c4> Last year I played against John Fedorowicz in a simul: Fedorowicz vs F Rhine, 2012. Fedorowicz, author of one of the better books on the Benko Gambit, played 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 in our game and at every other opportunity, later explaining that he eschewed 2.c4 because he hates playing against the Benko. (But see Fedorowicz vs P Peev, 2011, though the Fed returned the pawn with 5.b6 in that game.) To my mind, 2.Nf3 is too committal, forfeiting the opportunity to play openings with Nge2 and/or f3. <2...c5 3.d5 b5> Sure enough, the Benko. I expected it, having seen Krom play it two weeks before in the Midwest Chess Classic. I arrived at the board for this game about 15 minutes late, having hurriedly boned up a bit on 4.Nf3 before coming to the board. <4.Nf3> White's best-scoring move against the Benko, not that it's anything special if Black responds well. <4...Bb7!> Black's best-scoring response. I had hoped for 4...g6 5.cxb5 a6 6.Qc2 d6 7.e4, which Alex Yermolinsky discusses in <The Road to Chess Improvement> (the book I was cramming from before sitting down to play), which gives White better chances for an advantage. <5.a4> I knew that White often played this here to stabilize the position. It is indeed White's most common move, but it turns out that 5.Nbd2 scores better. But I have a hard time believing that 5.Nbd2 endangers the Benko's existence either. <5...bxc4> The most natural and often-played move. I knew that 5...a6 and 5...b4 were also possible. It turns out that the unusual 5... Qa5+!? is the best-scoring of Black's major moves, scoring 50% in Mega Database 2013. It's a bit awkward for White to develop after that. One line is 6.Bd2 b4 7.Qc2 d6 8.e4 e5 with approximate equality according to Houdini 3. <6.Nc3> My theoretical knowledge, such as it is, was basically at an end here. <6...g6 7.e4 d6 8.Bxc4> I knew that 8.Nd2 and Nxc4 was also an idea, but that seemed very slow. <8...Bg7 9.O-O O-O 10.Re1 Nbd7 11.a5 a6 12.h3> Stopping Ng4 followed by Nge5, which Krom later said he'd intended. <12...Nh5!?> Still intending ...Ne5, and provoking my next move. <13.g4!?> Perhaps I shouldn't have let myself be provoked, but Houdini doesn't show other moves as leading to an advantage either. <13...Nhf6 14.Bg5> Houdini, probably rightly, prefers 14.Bf4. <14...Rb8> More natural is 14...h5 to exploit the weakening of my kingside pawn structure. In the post-mortem Krom suggested 15.Bxf6 Nxf6 16.e5 dxe5 17.Nxe5 in response, which is OK, but Black is fine. <15.Qd2 Bc8>


click for larger view

<16.e5!?> Intending the crazed tactical sequence that follows. In the olden days I would have played more quietly, and most likely drawn. (Cf. the 1982 Midwest Masters Invitational, where I drew all five of my games.) But I've finally developed some "testicular fortitude" (as Illinois' most recently incarcerated governor would say) and, having won $700 at the Midwest Chess Classic two weeks before, was hoping for another big payday. I knew that a draw would get little money. To hell with that. (As it turns out, a draw would have resulted in John and me being in a 6-way tie for 3rd and 4th prizes, getting $100 each.) I figured that this way one of us would probably go down in flames. Him, I hoped, though I knew it could just as easily be me. I did my best to try to figure out what was going on before playing 16.e5!?, but without much success. I used up most of my time in this endeavor, leaving me with just 11 minutes to make move 30. Not too smart. There was also a 5-second delay, but that's little help.

TO BE CONTINUED . . . .

Jul-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: PART TWO

Rhine-Krom, continued

<16... dxe5>


click for larger view

<17.Nxe5>

Houdini points out that I could still have played quietly with 17.b3 intending to capture the pawn on e5 later. It analyzes 17...Ne8 18.Bh6 Nd6 19.Bxg7 Kxg7 20.Nxe5 Nxe5 21.Rxe5 Rb4 22.Rae1 Rxc4 23.bxc4 Nxc4 24.Qe2 Nxe5 25.Qxe5+ Kg8 26.Qxe7 Qxa5 27.Qf6 Bb7 28. Re7 Qb4=. <17... Nxe5> Houdini suggests an alternative that hadn't occurred to me, 17...Ne4 18.Rxe4 Nxe5, which also leads to equal positions. <18.Rxe5 Nxg4>


click for larger view

<19.Rxe7> Not 19.Bxe7?? Nxe5! 20.Bxd8 Nf3+, winning. <19... h6 20.hxg4 hxg5 21.Qxg5> I had seen this far before embarking on 16.e5!? Also possible was 21.d6, which I rejected because of 21...Bf6. However, Houdini nonchalantly responds with 22.Rae1 with advantage. Instead, its main line runs 21...Rb4 22.b3 Bd4 23.Qxg5 Rxc4 24.bxc4 Bxc3 25.Ra3 Bg7 26.Qxc5 Bxg4 27.Rae3 Bf6 28.Qd5 Bh4 29.Re1 Bf5 30.R1e3 Bd7 31.Qb7 Bf5 32.Qd5 Bd7 33.Qb7 Bc8=. <21...Rxb2> Yet again, Houdini suggests an alternative that hadn't occurred to me, namely 21...Rb4. It analyzes 22.Ra4 Bxc3 23.Rxb4 cxb4! (23...Bxb4? 24.Qf6 gives White a decisive attack) 24.bxc3 bxc3 25.Bd3 Qd6 26.Bc2 Bxg4 27.Re3 Bd7 28.Rxc3 Re8 29.Re3 Rxe3 30.fxe3 Bb5 31.Kg2 Bc4 32.Be4 Kg7 33.Qf4 Qxf4 34.exf4 Kf6=. Chess is so easy when you can analyze a billion or so positions a second!


click for larger view

<22.Rc1> Better was 22. Ne4! Rc2 23.Bd3 with a small advantage to White. <22...Rb7!> I hadn't anticipated that. Here I thought, "Oh crap, I'm going to lose." <23.d6> A sad necessity.


click for larger view

<23...Qxd6!> I was hoping for 23...Bxc3?? 24.Qxg6+! and my attack crashes through.

TO BE CONTINUED . . . .

Jul-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: PART THREE

Rhine-Krom, continued


click for larger view

<24.Nd5?> This looked good, but it's not. Correct was 24.Re3! Qd2 25.Rd1 Qc2 26.Rd6 Rb1+ 27.Nxb1 Qxc4=. <24...Rb2?> I would've been in big trouble after 24... Bd4!, which Houdini assesses as -1.46. <25.Re3?> Now I could have won with 25.Rd1! Rc2 26.Ra7 Rxc4 27.Ne7+ Kh7 28.Qh4+ Bh6 29.Rxd6 Rxg4+ 30.Qxg4 Bxg4 31.Nxg6. <25...Rd8??> 25...Bd4! 26.Rd1! Kg7 (not 26...Bxe3 27.Nxe3 Rd2 28.Rxd2 Qxd2 29.Qxg6+ Kh8 30.Bxf7 Qe1+ 31.Nf1 Rxf7 32.Qxf7 Be6 33.Qh5+ Kg8 34.Qxc5 ) 27.Rxd4 cxd4 28.Rh3 Rh8 29.Rxh8 Kxh8 30.Nf6 Qf8 31.Qe5 Rb1+ 32.Bf1 d3 33.Nd7+ Qg7 34.Qe8+ Qg8 35.Qe5+ Qg7 36.Nf6 Qh6 37.Nd7+ Kg8 38.Qe8+ Kh7 39.Qxf7+ Kh8 40.Qe8+ with equality. <26.Ne7+ Kf8>


click for larger view

<27.Rd3??> With a minute on my clock to make move 30, I miss the crushing 27.Rf3! Bd4 (27...Qxe7 28.Rxf7+ Qxf7 29. Bxf7 +7.06) 28.Nxg6+ Ke8 29.Re1+ Kd7 30.Rxf7+ Kc6 31.Ne7+ winning the house (+31.02). <27...Bf6?> (27...Bd4! 28.Nxg6+ fxg6 29.Re1! Bxf2+ 30.Kf1 Bxe1 31.Rxd6 Rxd6 32.Kxe1 Rbd2 33.Qxc5 Bxg4 34.Bxa6 R2d5 35.Qb4 Rd4=) <28.Qh6+! Kxe7!> 28...Bg7 29.Nxg6+ Qxg6 (29...Kg8 30.Qf4! Qxf4 31.Rxd8+ Kh7 32.Nxf4 Bxg4) 30.Qxg6 fxg6 31.Rxd8+ Ke7 32.Rxc8 leaves White with an extra rook in either case. <29.Rxd6 Rxd6 30.Qh7?> A weak decentralizing move in time pressure. 30.Re1+! Be6 31.Bxe6 Rxe6 32.Rxe6+ Kxe6 33.Qe3+ Kd6 34.Qf4+ Be5 35.Qxf7 Bd4 36.Qxg6+ Kd5 37.Qxa6 Rxf2 38.Kh1 wins (+3.10).


click for larger view

<30... Be6?> The initiative is critical in such positions. Once again 30...Bd4! was the move, when Black's counterattack is sufficient to equalize: 31.Qxf7+ Kd8 32.Rf1 Rf6 33.Qd5+ Bd7 34.Kh2 Kc7 35.Qe4 Rb4 36.Bd5 Rd6 37. Rc1 Bxg4 38. Qf4 Bf5 39. Rc4 Rxc4 40. Bxc4 Kd7 41. Kg2 Rf6=. <31.Bxe6 Rxe6 32. Rxc5 Be5> 32...Re1+ was a better try, e.g. 33.Kg2 Ree2 34.Rc7+ Kd6 35.Rxf7 Rxf2+ 36.Kg1 Rg2+ 37.Kh1 Rgf2 38.Rd7+ Ke5 39.Rd1 Kf4 40.Qh6+ Bg5 41.Qh3±. <33. Qh4+> I was now sure that I was past the time control and finally stopped blitzing. <33...Kd6> 33...Bf6 34.g5 <34. Rc8! Bf6?> Walking into mate, but 34...Rf6 35.Qh3 Kd7 36.g5+ Rf5 37.Rc5 +2.48 isn't much of an improvement. <35.Qg3+ Be5 36.Qd3+> Seeing 36...Ke7 37.Qd8#, John resigned. 1-0

A very flawed game, but I won it. I'm reminded of Tartakower's definition of "winner" as the player who plays the next-to-last blunder. Vladimir Skavych won against Daniel Farah to win the section, and $1400, with 4.5/5. I tied with Anthony Parker of Wisconsin for 2nd-3rd at 4-1, each of us winning $550. http://chesstournamentservices.com/... Not a bad couple of weeks: I had also tied for second, earning $700, at the Midwest Chess Classic two weeks before. This result also regained my master rating, raising my rating from 2189 to 2204. http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j...

Jul-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Crud. My last diagram is wrong; the white queen should be on h7, not h6.
Jul-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR>: Just read your piece on Wendell Willkie at (Kenneth Rogoff) from a time ago while using the search feature for other, misguided purposes.

It is indeed beyond the bounds of one's imagination that a candidate for any office would allow such an opportunity to go by the boards today-one need only look at the infighting over the most trivial of transgressions, either real or perceived. The pettiness and mean-spiritedness appear to reach new heights with each passing day, and in my opinion, instant social media only exacerbates matters, enabling instant gratification to carry the day over looking before one leaps.

Jul-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WCC Editing Project: <JustAnotherBrickInThe>

HHHHAAA

I beg your pardon AHAHAHAHAHAHA

Jul-29-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Just submitted this:

[Event "Mikenas Cup"]
[Site "Klaipeda"]
[Date "1983.??.??"]
[EventDate "1983.05.??"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Chernin, Alexander"]
[Black "Kveinys, Aloyzas"]
[ECO "A21"]
[WhiteElo "2475"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "21"]

1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 f5 3. d4 exd4 4. Qxd4 Nc6 5. Qe3+ Qe7 6. Nd5 Qxe3 7. Bxe3 Bd6 8. Nf3 Nge7 9. O-O-O a6 10. Nb6 Rb8 11. Rxd6 1-0

Jul-29-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WCC Editing Project: <FSR> very interesting-

After

11...cxd6
12.Bf4


click for larger view

White with a big advantage- can get the exchange back at leisure. Black is handcuffed. Look at Black's poor dark square Bishop, buried thousands of leagues beneath the sea.

Jul-29-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <WCC Editing Project> Yes. I (well, Houdini 3 and I) analyzed Chernin-Kveinys in the notes to A Shaw vs F Teuton, 1995.
Jul-30-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WCC Editing Project: <FSR> Thanks for the tip- Cool that you annotated a <perfidious> game.

Did you guys ever meet OTB in real life?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 156)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 37 OF 156 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC