|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
Dec-30-04
 |
| tpstar: <woody2007> Hello! Welcome to this great site! This is a place for study and analysis, but not actual play. If you'd like to play chess go here = ChessGames.com Help See you around. |
 |
Mar-07-05
 |
| tamar: Kind of sparse here, with only a fellow looking for a game, and a courteous referral from <tpstar> Looks like the Cafe de la Regence at about 7 am... |
 |
Mar-07-05
 |
| Gypsy: What do you expect <tamar> -- its early evening, year 1858. Only her Harrwitz is sitting already in the corner, working something over the board. They say Harrwitz may right now be the strongest player in Europe; he is due to play some wiz-kid from America soon... Even fifty years from now, Lasker will acnowledge Harrwitz as a master of great practical strengh. But, in general, Harwitz will be remebered for one feet only, for a match he ... lost. |
 |
| Mar-07-05 |
| SBC: For the record, you can read G. A. Macdonnell's favorable characterization of Harrwitz here: http://batgirl.atspace.com/Harrwitz... A short bio of Harrwitz here: http://batgirl.atspace.com/Harrwitz... But here's Frederick Edge's somewhat less favorable description: "His [Harrwitz] opponents are generally visitors to the café, not the habitués; for these last have taken great dislike to his very offensive manner, and will not contend with him. They say, too, that he evinces an improper desire to win, and, in consequence, will only give odds of pawn and move, when he could well afford pawn and two, and the knight instead of the rook. In my character of historian, I am bound to state that the feel was very intense at the Régence in favor of Morphy, and many the prayers (French prayers) that Harrwitz might succomb to him. The two celebrities shook hands together, and Morphy immediately asked if he would consent to play a match. The fact is, the young Paul meant mischief. Everybody in England was loud in praise of Harrwitz's skill, and prophesied a tough encounter. There was reason for this; for the Prussian player has given himself up, body and soul, to the game. Staunton's literary avocations now permit him but an hour or two weekly for chess, although the former lived in the London Divan, as Harrwitz in the Régence, and was so rabid about Caissa. that he actually wore shirts with kings, rooks, pawns, etc. printed over the bosoms and tails... ...Harrwitz is the only man I know of who seems to live for chess, and we can, therefore, easily understand why Morphy was so desirous of playing him. To our hero's question, Harrwitz gave a reply so non-commital, that Morphy said, aside, to me, "He won't play a match." A crowd had collected around us, and the Prussian, thinking it an admirable opportunity for display, asked Morphy whether he had any objection to an off-hand game. Of course, he had not. Harrwitz had the move, and played an Algaier Gambit, which, after a hard fight, he won. Morphy was somewhat excited, made a mistake in the opening, by which he lost three pawns for nothing at all, and yet fought the battle with such determination, that the number of moves was not far short of a hundred. His antagonist was delighted with his victory, thought he was sure of Morphy, and engaged to settle the preliminaries of a match on the following day." |
 |
Mar-08-05
 |
| tamar: Here is that offhand game played a few days into September of 1858. Draw your own conclusions, but I believe Morphy had been put in a pickle by Harrwitz' well timed offer of an offhand game instead of a match, right when Morphy was telling Edge "He won't play a match." Problem: if Morphy won, Harrwitz, already skittish, would be on guard, and probably create some excuse not to play. But if Morphy lost, this game might be his lone opportunity to play Harrwitz, who could then dismiss him as weak. How to play? Morphy seemed "excited", he may have been genuinely unsure how to proceed. Harrwitz vs Morphy, 1858 |
 |
Mar-08-05
 |
| Knight13: Hey, man. Harrwitz was a very good chess master. I've learned lots of stuff from him by watching his games. Study more closely. |
 |
| Mar-08-05 |
| aw1988: Naturally, studying the ideas and variations to back up those ideas of the world champions and other strong players, or anyone really, is an excellent way to improve. So, Knight13, what have you learned from Harrwitz? |
 |
Mar-08-05
 |
| Gypsy: < tamar: Here is that offhand game ... > OK, I am now practically convinced that there were some heavy-duty mind games going on between Harrwitz and Morphy. Otherwise, I need to believe that Morphy either overlooked or underestimated the obvious 12.Qxg4+, when he played 10...O-O. And all that while he had the obvious and practically winning 10...bxc6 11.Nxc6 Nxc6 12.Bxc6+ Bd7... available. |
 |
| Mar-08-05 |
| SBC: . As you probably know, when Morphy and Edge arrived in Paris, their arrival was unannounced. They visited la Régence incognito and just took in the atmosphere. Harrwitz was out of town, so there was no rush on their part. I've always felt Edge's description of their first impression of the Café de la Régence to be the best part of his book. For those who haven't had the good fortune to read it, I put that passage here: http://batgirl.atspace.com/regence.... . |
 |
Mar-09-05
 |
| Gypsy: < sbc > Thanks for the great reading! |
 |
Mar-10-05
 |
| Knight13: <aw1988> I've learned his style of play and some tactics... And some of his opening play like the move c3. |
 |
| Jan-05-06 |
| BIDMONFA: Daniel Harrwitz HARRWITZ, Daniel
http://www.bidmonfa.com/harrwitz_da...
_ |
 |
Apr-29-06
 |
| Knight13: Happy Birthday, Daniel Harrwitz!!! |
 |
Mar-13-07
 |
| Knight13: I've enjoyed viewing this guy's games more than any other 19th century players, except Henry Edward Bird. |
 |
| Apr-23-07 |
| wolfmaster: Compared to his contemporaries,(Bird,Anderssen,Morphy etc...) Harrwitz had the lowest draw/game
ratio at about 1/6. Bird had 1/7, Morphy(because he destroyed everybody)1/14, and Anderssen 1/14. Lowenthal also had a high 1/6. Others include Mayet 1/16(LOL), und Der Lasa( a bit before Harrwitz),1/6,Kieseritsky ,1/10,De Reviere 1/12, DuBois 1/9,Staunton 1/8, Von Jaenisch 1/5(because of his long fought matches with Ilya Shumov), Max Lange 1/9, Shumov 1/13, Elijah Williams 1/5,(who contested a long match with Harrwitz in 1852) Horwitz 1/8(another player with whom Harrwitz handled fairly easily in a long match called "The Battle of the Witz) Kennedy 1/13,Szen 1/11. |
 |
Apr-23-07
 |
| keypusher: <wolfmaster>
<Horwitz 1/8(another player with whom Harrwitz handled fairly easily in a long match called "The Battle of the Witz)> As you can see by looking at the bio above, Harrwitz played two matches with Horwitz, and both were extremely close. Given that we have nowhere near a complete record for any mid-19th century player, and the games we do have are a mix of match games, tournament games, and casual games, drawing ratios don't mean much. |
 |
| Apr-23-07 |
| elLocoEvans: In that engraving Harrwitz has some resemblance to a sleepy Poe. |
 |
| Sep-07-08 |
| GrahamClayton: Harrwitz was renowned for taking "vacations" in the middle of matches. Source: David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld, "Oxford Companion to Chess", 2nd edition, OUP, 1992 |
 |
Oct-24-08
 |
| Karpova: From Jeremy P. Spinrad's "Chess Journalism: Old and New", May 2007: http://www.chesscafe.com/text/spinr... Page 4: <The first part of the magazine is devoted to discussing the recent match between Harrwitz and Löwenthal, which to Staunton's dismay was won by Harrwitz. How did Staunton congratulate the victor?"We cannot resist recording our conviction that in no Chess match of importance ever played, was the truth of the familiar proverb which tells us 'the race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong,' so forcefully exemplified as in this."> From "The Chess Player's Chronicle", 1854 |
 |
| Oct-28-08 |
| wolfmaster: <keypusher> You are as wrong as wrong can be. |
 |
| Oct-28-08 |
| Nietzowitsch: <wolfmaster> Statistics are the triumph of the quantitative method, and the quantitative method is the victory of sterility and death. You are as wrong as wrong can be! |
 |
| Oct-29-08 |
| wolfmaster: <Nietzowitsch> What? |
 |
| Apr-26-09 |
| myschkin: . . .
<< Lehrbuch des Schachspiels> (1862) > http://books.google.com/books?id=t8... +.pdf download |
 |
| Apr-29-09 |
| WhiteRook48: what a weird player |
 |
| Oct-04-09 |
| GrahamClayton: Some interesting biographical information about Harrwitz's date of birth and death can be found at:
http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
|
 |
|