chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

  
Alexander McDonnell
Number of games in database: 105
Years covered: 1825 to 1835
Overall record: +35 -49 =14 (42.9%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      7 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (19) 
    B21 B32 B30
 King's Gambit Accepted (14) 
    C33 C37 C38
 Evans Gambit (6) 
    C51 C52
With the Black pieces:
 Evans Gambit (19) 
    C51 C52
 Queen's Gambit Accepted (15) 
    D20
 Giuoco Piano (6) 
    C53
 Bishop's Opening (4) 
    C23
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834 0-1
   La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834 0-1
   McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais, 1834 1-0
   McDonnell vs NN, 1830 1-0
   McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais, 1834 1-0
   La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834 0-1
   McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais, 1834 1-0
   McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais, 1834 1-0
   La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834 1/2-1/2
   La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834 1/2-1/2

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Blunder check: Alexander McDonnell by nimh
   Selected 19th century games by atrifix
   zumakal blunders archivadas5 by zumakal
   Ideas by LaBourdonnaisdeux

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Alexander McDonnell
Search Google for Alexander McDonnell


ALEXANDER MCDONNELL
(born May-22-1798, died Sep-14-1835) United Kingdom

[what is this?]
Alexander McDonnell was born in Belfast, Ireland. A player of GM strength, he initially studied chess under William Lewis in the 1820s and from June to October 1834 contested six matches against Louis Charles Mahe De La Bourdonnais. Although he lost by an overall score of (+27, =13, -45), the high standard of play did a great deal to raise the profile of chess in both France and England. McDonnell died in 1835 of Bright's Disease (now known as acute or chronic nephritis) and is buried in Kensal Green cemetery in London.

Wikipedia article: Alexander McDonnell


 page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 105  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Captain Evans vs McDonnell 1-020 1825 LondonC52 Evans Gambit
2. McDonnell vs NN 1-028 1828 EnglandC38 King's Gambit Accepted
3. Captain Evans vs McDonnell 1-020 1829 London (England)C51 Evans Gambit
4. McDonnell vs NN 1-021 1830 CasualC30 King's Gambit Declined
5. McDonnell vs A D'Arblay 1-027 1830 CasualC37 King's Gambit Accepted
6. McDonnell vs NN 1-018 1830 Casual000 Chess variants
7. McDonnell vs J Finch 1-026 1830 Casual000 Chess variants
8. McDonnell vs Popert 1-019 1830 England000 Chess variants
9. McDonnell vs NN 1-024 1830 Casual000 Chess variants
10. NN vs McDonnell 0-152 1830 CasualC23 Bishop's Opening
11. McDonnell vs Harrison 1-022 1830 Casual000 Chess variants
12. McDonnell vs NN 1-024 1830 CasualC33 King's Gambit Accepted
13. McDonnell vs J Finch 1-015 1830 Casual000 Chess variants
14. McDonnell vs W Fraser  1-037 1831 London mC00 French Defense
15. McDonnell vs W Fraser 1-037 1831 London mC53 Giuoco Piano
16. W Fraser vs McDonnell 0-125 1831 MacDonnell vs. FraserC53 Giuoco Piano
17. McDonnell vs W Fraser ½-½74 1831 London mC00 French Defense
18. W Fraser vs McDonnell 1-054 1831 London mC53 Giuoco Piano
19. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-129 1834 LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
20. La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell 1-036 1834 London m3 ;HCL 18D20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
21. La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell 1-0100 1834 London m5 ;HCL 18C51 Evans Gambit
22. La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell 1-030 1834 LondonD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
23. McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais 0-153 1834 London m4 ;MAINBC23 Bishop's Opening
24. La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell 1-060 1834 London m6 ;HCL 18C51 Evans Gambit
25. La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell 0-153 1834 LondonD00 Queen's Pawn Game
 page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 105  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | McDonnell wins | McDonnell loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-14-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Of course, you are the supreme expert on that ... (errors - esp. those in print?).
Mar-14-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Well, AJ, I have corrected enough of your errors.
Mar-15-13  thomastonk: <AJ> Okay, I have seen "only" two editions of Utterberg's book: a paperback from 2012 and a library binding from 2005, both green, but very different. If there is a black one, too: my mistake!

<Yes, if Chernev said the game was a McDonnell - La Bourdonnais; that is good enough for me.> I would like to explain to you in a friendly way why we won't improve this database or our knowledge on chess history in this way. Former generations had much less opportunities to read primary sources, and hence the authors - most of them no historians - wrote from their memories or filled gaps even by speculation. If we rely on these secondary sources, then we collect all their mistakes, and if we proceed in the same way, we will be someday on Winter's site as another bad example, too. But, nowadays most chess books and magazines from the 19th century can be read online, and so everybody can check the details himself, assumed he is willing to spend some time. Otherwise, cg is a good place to find someone who is willing and has even fun doing this.

<Live and learn.> I'm not a native speaker, but if this has an arrogant undertone, then I dislike it. Please don't forget that you submitted a doubtful game, and that you neither found it here, nor in another database nor in a primary source, and that you didn't knew who William Greenwood Walker is.

Mar-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Been involved with chess since before you were born ... forgotten more about chess than you will ever know ...
Mar-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <Been involved with chess since before you were born> Being involved with chess for a long time does not make you an authority. In your case, it has only made you arrogant.

W.G. Walker was at these McDonnell - La Bourdonnais matches and recorded them for history. What part of that do you not understand? That makes him the expert and Chernev a secondary source.

Try as you might, AJ, YOU cannot rewrite chess history.

Mar-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: And before you dismiss <thomastonk> as a no-nothing, you might want too know that he has been cited in Winter's <Chess Notes> for his historical discoveries.

As have I.

Have you been cited at Winter's column? Have you added to chess history?

This is the same Winter of whom you said you would accept his authority.

Mar-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <And before you dismiss <thomastonk> as a no-nothing, you might want too know that he has been cited in Winter's <Chess Notes> for his historical discoveries. As have I.

Have you been cited at Winter's column? Have you added to chess history?

This is the same Winter of whom you said you would accept his authority.>

I meant to say "know-nothing".

Mar-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <TheFocus> That's, um, nothing-we can all make mistakes and it is hardly worth a mention.

Here's another vote for <thomastonk>: he's a decent guy and a positive contributor to this site.

At least you were not a member of the Know-Nothing Party!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_N...

Mar-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: And since Chernev is one of my all-time favorite authors, anyone who takes a dig at him will only earn my eternal contempt.

True story - 1970's, young man hitchhikes to San Fran for a chess tournament. After several nights ... sleeping on a bench and such ... he is taken in by none other than Chernev.

I personally saw ... with my own eyes ... walls covered with chess books and magazines ... he must have had thousands of them. He could go to any one of them and pull out a problem and show it to you.

He lived, ate and breathed chess. So - when some DING-DONG on this site says Chernev was a un-educated puke who made lots of mistakes ... and did not know beans about chess ... he is only showing his own total and complete IGNORANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I will take Chernev's word over yours ... any day today, and twice on Sunday. Is that clear enough for you?

Mar-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: BTW ... back in the 1930's or so, Chernev was probably in the TOP TEN players in the good, ole USA.
Mar-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: And if you need PROOF, I would suggest Soltis's book on the History of the U.S. Championships. (Lots of cross-tables, educate yourself.)
Mar-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: And if you want to settle the argument, write Winter.

ChessBase, USCF, (me) [and many others!!!] consider him to be the final authority on such matters.

If you don't then I would suggest you are <again> just full of hot air ... but we all know that this is par for the course.

Mar-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Poor <AJ>. Someone points out that you were wrong, even provide evidence, and you respond with insults. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

I did a search at <Chess Notes>, and not surprisingly, your name doesn't turn up. So much for Winter citing your pages.

My name shows up. <thomastonk>'s does. But not yours. Hmmm. I wonder why?

Mar-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: And, let me point out that <Winter> does not hold Chernev as the most trust-worthy of sources in: http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/....
Mar-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: <Been involved with chess since before you were born ... forgotten more about chess than you will ever know ...>

Let's see

Thomas Niessen

Highest rating achieved in database: 2495.

A J Goldsby

Highest rating achieved in database: 2283

Mar-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: So <thomastonk>'s alterego is Thomas Niessen ?

I didn't know that. That's what I like about this site, the pleasant revelations that sometimes occur.

:)

Mar-19-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: BTW - one more addendum. Although he never personally gave me lessons, I became master probably because of Chernev's books. Chernev's books on "The Most Instructive Games of Chess" and also the one on Capa's best endings ... at one time, I had memorized many of these games.I am sure I would never had become a master, if not for the writings of Chernev.
Mar-20-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Today, I probably have a couple of thousand books, I don't even try to count them any more. (Something like five bookcases full. Some shelves, have stacks in back and rows in front ... and just about all of them have stacks - that go nearly to the ceiling - on top.)

However, I can still clearly remember when I only had around 15-20 books in my library. (This was back in the early 1970's.) A few favorites were:

#1.) "The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played." (Chernev)

#2.) "The Complete Chessplayer." (Reinfeld)

#3.) "1000 (best) Short Games of Chess" (Chernev)

#4.) "Capa's Best Endgames," (Chernev).

#5.) "The Chess Companion," (Chernev).

#6.) A Pamphlet on Staunton's Games. (I forgot who did it, I won this as a prize at a chess tournament, I lost it many years ago.)

#7.) A Dover reprint (soft cover, blue)of Paul Morphy's Games.

The rest were all opening books ... ... ... (King's Indian, Dragon, Benoni, two on the Grunfeld, etc.)

At one time, I had literally memorized all the (complete) games in the first two books, several friends (Bruce Andersson and David Kurjan) who knew me in my High School days can attest to this.

Mar-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: See also a few of my comments on:
McDonnell vs La Bourdonnais, 1835, as they are relevant here.
May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  brankat: A very fine master Mr.McDonnell.
May-22-13  thomastonk: From "The Belfast News Letter", Oct 2, 1835:

"Chess - Death of Mr. M`Donnell - The amateurs of chess in this country have to regret the loss of Alex. M`Donnell, Esq. who died last week at the early age of 37. This gentleman was not only the best chess player in the united kingdom (sic), but the best our country has possessed since Philidor. His talents were not, however, confined to this one pursuit, but appeared equally to grasp and command a variety of subjects, difficult of attainment to ordinary minds. He was the author of several valuable works on political economy, West India commerce, and foreign trade in general, and his style, which was remarkable perspicuous, illuminated his comprehensive views with great felicity. By the Westminster and London Chess clubs, of which he was a member, this melancholy bereavement of their best player is felt as a domestic misfortune. It was Mr. M`Donnell who played the long series of games, amounting to nearly 100, with Mons. de la Bourdonnais, in the Westminster Chess Club, about a year past. Mr. M`Donnell for many years held the high situation of secretary to the West India Committee at the Dock-house in Billiter-square, London, and was the son of Dr. M`Donnell, of Belfast."

May-22-13  thomastonk: From "The Hull Packet", Oct 2, 1835:

"Chess - The amateurs of chess in this country have to regret the loss of Alexander M`Donnell, Esq., who died last week at the early age of 37, after a short illness. This gentleman was not only the best chess player in the United Kingdom, but the best our country has possessed since Philidor. Indeed Philidor was a Frenchman, though the greater part of his life was spent in England, it may be fairly said that Mr. M`Donnell was the greatest English player upon record."

<Here the text continues about his talents, books etc. like the obituary above.>

"The chess world will not soon forget him, and by the Westminster and London chess clubs, of which he was a member, this unexpected and melancholy bereavement of their best player is felt as a domestic misfortune. It was Mr. M`Donnell, who played the long series of games, amounting to nearly 100, with Mons. de la Bourdonnais, in the Westminster chess club, about a year past. His excellence as a chess-player was associated with a kindly spirit, of the finest quality. He was always ready for the field, not only to play, but to instruct ; and in this respect nothing could exceed the patience with which he would communicate information to the less advanced amateur. To eulogize his skill in the science is needless - he leaves none behind him whose names are worthy of being written on the same page. In his life he was beloved, in his death he is deeply lamented. Mr. M`Donnell for many years held the high situation of secretary of the West India committee at the dock-house in Billiter-square, and was the son of Dr. M`Donnell, of Belfast. He died at his residence in Tavistock-square, and his remains are interred in the cemetery an the Harrow-road."

May-22-13  KlingonBorgTatar: Albeit for a brief period of time, McDonnell was the world's best player or proto world champion from the time he won the second match from de la Bourdonnais till he lost the third match of their series. He was leading the unfinished sixth and final match when he was taken away from this world and who knows what the result could have been had he lived a few weeks longer. Paul Morphy considers the games of these two gentlemen the finest chess ever and went as far to annotate15 of them. There is a picture of McDonnell in Edward Winter's site.
May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: Pieces out.
May-23-13  thomastonk: <KlingonBorgTatar: ... what the result could have been had he lived a few weeks longer.> The 6 matches were played in the summer of 1834, McDonnell died one year later.

<Paul Morphy considers the games of these two gentlemen the finest chess ever ..> Such statements were often made in the 1840s by earlier authors. Morphy begun the series of commented games with a compliment, and called the games "beautiful models of chess strategy". But prior to that he had already presented his true intention: "True, they have been published before ; but no satisfactory analysis has, to our knowledge, ever been appended to them." His comments do not follow the tradition to praise everything both men played. He clearly distinguished between the good and the bad parts of their games. The opening play, and in particular McDonnell's, is several times harshly criticized. Here is one example: "The great fault to be with M'Donnell's play in all these Sicilian and French openings, as also in the Queen's Gambits, is loss of time, which, against such a powerful antagonist as Labourdonnais, could ill be afforded by any player."

<... and went as far to annotate15 of them.> More than twice times as much: games annotated by Morphy.

<There is a picture of McDonnell in Edward Winter's site.> Mr Winter's feature article entitled "Alexander McDonnell" begins with these words: "No picture of Alexander McDonnell has ever been found, ...". But at the end of that article one can find at least an old picture of his grave.

From your user profile: <"I am a former director of the National Chess Federation of the Philippines. Used to be rated at 2200. Just retired from my chemistry and engineering career but just 'unretired' from chess!> Good to know. I am sure, you'll understand that I don't like to correct sloppy statements in this way. So, with due respect, I would like to ask you to be more careful with the facts. Thanks.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies