< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 10 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Feb-19-04 | | Bartleby: Ughaibu: Some ancient Greek "tabula" (board/slate) game at the time, probably Petteia. It is surmised from the writings of Plato that Petteia derived from Egypt. Such things were known to exist and could be called war games; a protochess progenitor before Chatarang, Xiangqi, and Shogi. Petteia was played on an 8X8 board and seems to be similar to Othello and Go. In its case, one wins by "stalemating," immobilizing your opponent completely. Even if Aristotle had nothing near modern chess in mind compared with Petteia, I like the sentiment. Here is a website for more information on Petteia (and other protochess games): http://ablemedia.com/ctcweb/showcas... |
|
Feb-19-04 | | ughaibu: Thanks for the link. |
|
May-05-04 | | Tennyson: Just purchased a generic looking book, "Learn to Attack with Rudolf Spielmann" by Eric Schiller. Don't let the cheap looking cover fool you, though. Good smattering of Spielmann's games: all played as white, king pawn openings. Schiller floats a good theory when it comes to tactical study: "It is well-known that the most instructive games for novices are those which involve players from the Classical and Romantic periods of chess...1890-1930. This is due to the general lack of defensive technique seen in those games." On the whole, some well annotated games and good selection. Kasparov only lists two of Spielmann's games in his "My Greatest Predecessors, Part 1," both where Spielmann loses. Shouldn't Kasparov give the man more credit for the art of attack? Too old school, I guess. Too much, "the last knight of the King's Gambit." |
|
May-05-04 | | Gypsy: <aulero: <Stavrogin> Kasparov will dominate thanks to his opening preparation. I think that you need to fix the King's gambit as obliged opening. Then you can add Spassky and Bronstein> If the opening/computerized prep. is eliminated and KG is required, then you should include Chigorin (pre-cancer), Charousek, and Duras. Any of those guys could win it outright. In addition to Spassky and Bronstein, Keres and Alekhine should also be there. Oh, do not forget Nezhmedinov. Nov you may have the tournament of the greatest of attackers! |
|
Sep-06-04 | | BiLL RobeRTiE: Poor Rudy looks like the harlequin fetus. :( |
|
Oct-24-04 | | WMD: The following open letter, translated from the original which appeared in the Wiener Schach-Zeitung in May 1932, appears in Pablo Moran's A. Alekhine, Agony of a Chess Genius. Moran calls it 'a highly significant judgment of Alekhine's antisemitism' but, in a footnote, the translator/editor Frank Mur wryly comments, '...any reader who sees in "J'accuse!" a "highly significant judgement of Alekhine's antisemitism" must have x-ray eyes.' J'ACCUSE
Neither by Zola nor by Dr. Tartakover, but by R.Spielmann. Honored World Champion Dr. Alekhine!
You, Mr. World Champion, will probably marvel at my audacity, which does not stop even before the steps of the exalted World Champion's throne, But, I accuse! Not your genial game, of course, which, as a chess enthusiast, I regard with the greatest esteem and admiration. No, my complaint is not directed at the World Champion Dr. Alekhine, but at my colleague Dr. Alekhine. For, in spite of your evident chess superiority, we are and will remain your professional colleagues, whom after all, you need for your immortal deeds. There is a proverb, which says, "Wealth is a precious knife, but one should use it to distribute bread, not to wound." Your predecessors Steinitz, Lasker and Capablanca always abode by it, and brought about better general conditions at master tournaments. You must not hold it against me, when I now seek to investigate the purposes for which you have so far been using your sharp World Championship weapon. Understand me correctly; it is not professional jealousy which causes me to say this. I would be the last to contest your well earned, hard-enough-fought-for title. After all, great achievements are specially rewarded in all areas, why not also in chess? But at San Remo 1930 and Bled 1931, besides the bonus pay, you stipulated special conditions, which practically eliminated Capablanca from these tournaments. Of course, you did not directly reject Capablanca, but chose a much more devious way which, however, changes nothing in the facts of the matter, which I, as an expert in this area, am quite capable of assessing. Must Capablanca, then, be punished so severely for his surpassing victory at New York 1927? But let the past be buried, and let us rather concern ourselves with your colleague Nimzovich, who could, after all, be regarded as the most successful present master after you and Capablanca. Does it not seem strange that he was not invited either to London 1932 or now to Berne? At least it would have been easy for you to steamroll an invitation for Nimzovich. As a juris dr. you are probably familiar with the "dolus eventualis." But, not enough, even I, a poor fiddler [in German, Spielmann means fiddler], who can thrive only in mountain air, seem to have become an undesirable. How else is one to explain the sudden cancellation of my visit to the Bernese Highlands, after I had received a valid, though unofficial lodging permit more than two months ago? To be sure, the Bernese committee points out that by your later acceptance there came to be one international master too many. Hats off to your greater reputation! But what world power besides the world championship's could have prevented the Swiss Chess Association from inviting seven instead of six international [masters]? The Swiss contingent would then have been only [sic] nine men strong, which would have been quite sufficient for the settlement of the Swiss Championship. So then, my dear World Champion, continue thrashing your opponents, and may you succeed in accomplishing yet many great deeds, to the delight of the whole chess world, only break yourself of commanding [ways], lest I be forced to shout at you the biblical words of the prophet Hosea, freely after Mark, "He who sows the wind shall reap the whirlwind." The measure is full; on both sides of the ocean those voices increase, which rebel against the World Champion's tyranny. - Rudolf Spielmann |
|
Oct-24-04
 | | ray keene: Any one interested in spielmann must look at his black win v rubinstein from san sebastian 1912-if you havent seen it you are in for a great and deeply pleasurable surprise!! |
|
Nov-26-04 | | ArmyBuddy: He looks like a mechanic in my FOB who got hit by mortars twice. And he's a chess player and beer drinker? You see not all of us who drink beer are dumbasses. His attacking style reminds me of Kieseritsky's, who was also fond of king hunts. |
|
Nov-26-04
 | | tpstar: <ArmyBuddy> Hello! Welcome to the group! Hope you can enjoy chess as some form of creative outlet besides your military duties. Best wishes and Happy Thanksgiving! P.S. If you really like beer, go here = Beer |
|
Nov-26-04 | | kostich in time: Spielmanns J'accuse text is a brilliant assault on Alekhine..what exactly where the 'conditions" Alekhine demanded at San Remo and Bled which effectively excluded Capablanca? |
|
Dec-29-04 | | acirce: <Rudolf Spielmann was born May 5, 1883, in Vienna. He learned to play chess while still a boy, and was exhibited in public as a prodigy, but in spite of that he later became a great master. With his nervous, impressionable temperament, he obtains unequal results. His greatest victories were: Gambit Tournament, Abbazia 1912, First Prize; San Sebastian 1912, Second and Third Prize divided with Nimzowitsch; Pistyan 1912, Second Prize; Gambit Tournament, Baden 1914, First Prize; Pistyan 1922, Second and Third Prize divided with Alekhin; Teplitz-Schoenau 1922, First and Second Prizes divided with the present author; Semmering 1926, First Prize - in this tournament all the masters of the first rank took part, with the exception of Capablanca and Lasker; Magdeburg 1927, First Prize. The most modern trend in chess, of which we shall have something more to say later, has often been called the new romantic style. This appellation is misleading, because even though it was no longer possible to win success in tournament play by mere technique, after the Steinitz principles were popularized and became widely known, the most modern players proceeded to develop the theory more widely and deeply, where Steinitz left off. Spielmann, on the other hand, really merits the epithet of a new romantic. For he seeks the salvation of chess in a return to the style of the old masters, of course with the unavoidable retention of the Steinitz principles, which have become necesary to technique. His models are Anderssen and Tschigorin. Spielmann is the last bard of the Gambit Game, and what he wanted to revive especially was the King's Gambit. Today his intentions and achievements can already be appraised from the historic point of view. He brought to his undertaking every necessary gift: not only great imagination and a talent for combinations, but also unusual resourcefulness in complicated situations, in which he felt perfectly at home, probably owing to the fact that he learned the game as a boy (compare Capablanca). It was therefore natural that he should become very successful. But he was thwarted in his real aspiration. He obtained his best results against weaker opponents, who lost their heads in complicated positions. The games he won in the old style are very interesting, but not convincing, and for that reason he could not create a school. He himself, in the course of years spent in his old Vienna, has grown less enthusiastic. The past is dead, but in the history of chess Spielmann will have a place of honour as the last upholder of the romantic tradition.> -- Richard Réti, "Masters of the Chess Board" |
|
May-08-05 | | aw1988: <Nordic Champion in 1919 and German Champion in 1927 his notable tournament achievements included 3rd= at St. Petersburg 1909,> I think I know who wrote the bio. |
|
Jun-01-05 | | ArturoRivera: Spielmann is one of my favorite players, but the title they gave to him was even better, the name is clearly appropiatted for him, and each time i said it i imagine what he was: a legend
Rudolf Spielmann, "The last Knight of the King's Gambit" |
|
Jul-14-05
 | | chancho: Spielmann and other players were invited to stay on in Moscow after the 1935 tournament. He absolutely refused to stay, because he hated the beer there! |
|
Jul-20-05
 | | TheAlchemist: A translated article by Georg Mohr:
October 10, 1938 a letter was sent from Prague. It was written by Rudolf Spielmann and was adressed to a well-known chess worker, writer and publisher Ludwig Kollin. It was impregnated with a cry of desperation. Here's an excerpt: <It's sad, that I've not only been exiled from Austria, my home, but I have also lost any privilege of free movement around the world. Almost every country with at least some chess life, have closed the doors for imigrants and refugees. I can't go anywhere with my worthless Austrian passport. For the past 6 months I have shared my fate with people on the edge of hunger, without homes, that we have lost - not by our fault. We don't receive any financial support and don't have any chance whatsoever of making money. The only thing that keeps me alive is the hope, that someday I will find work connected with chess. It's the only thing I can do!That's why I'm begging you: can You provide me any work in Your Stockholm or any place else in Sweden? I don't need a full-time job. Just something that can help me get to Sweden and help me gain back some morale and strength for times to come. Maybe it would make it easier for me to emigrate to America or England. I beg you, don't leave me in my misfortune. I accept any condition, just so I could work. The only important thing for me is - to escape from this damned Central Europe. Antisemitism is very strong here and is getting new dimensions in Prague as well, which is slowly taking my last hopes of survival away. Our 30-year acquaintance and friendship gives me hope, that you will answer me...> Just two weeks befor this letter, the famous AVRO tournament ended in Holland. Did any Grandmaster there think about the fate of their good friend and comrade? Not a single word about Spielmann can be found in many written sources, although many probably knew, what was going on. Did people not think back then? Or did the fear, that was spreading throughout Europe, paralyze people's emotions and apath has, like many times before and after, predominated? The fate of the Spielmann family is a typical story of a family, that lived in Austria at the wrong time. The Nazi terror destroyed many a human life. At the end of the 1870s Moritz Spielmann, Rudolf's father, moved to Vienna. The law from 1867 gave the Jews the same rights as Austrians. Vienna became a refuge for Jews from all over Europe. There Moritz met Cecilia Neustadt, whom he married in 1879. Moritz was the editor of one of the many Viennese newspapers and was a renown critic. Soon the family had expanded - they had 6 children. The two oldest sons, Leopold (born 1881)and Rudolf (born 1883) had exceptional talents. Their father had introduced them to chess when they were still young. There were many cafe's in Vienna, where people used to play chess for money. And that was Moritz' passion. Soon, the two sons began following their father's footsteps. The artistic genes were carried by the Spielmann children. Rudolf's chess fame overshadowed Lepold's musical talent, which was appreciated the most by his brother Rudolf. Leopold's talent was soon noticed by Anton Rubinstein, the famous musician, who introduced him to the royal family and in 1891 he performed for Franz Joseph. himself. Rudolf was attracted by mathematics, but the romantic call of sacrifices had prevailed (fortunately!). Rudolf dedicated his entire life to chess. He ramained in Vienna, although he traveled a lot to tournaments. He had very inconsistent results and brilliant performances were followed by disasters. He was mostly a man of moods and he seeked beauty above all in chess. He won many brilliancy prizes. He didn't create a family of his own, but was very attached to the families of his brothers and sisters. His nephews were always looking forward to his return home. They called him "grandpa Rudi" and, humble as he was, he didn't need anything else. Just an occasional glass of good beer. |
|
Jul-20-05
 | | TheAlchemist: His tragic fate began unfolding in 1934, when Leopold had to leave Munich. He moved to Prague, where he made a living with cheap musical lessons and could hardly support his family. Austria soon showed it's real face and Rudolf had to leave home as well. He moved in with his sisters in Holland and was happy to play an occasional simul, where he earned the money for a decent lunch. In autumn of 1938, he moved in with his brother in Prague, where he saw him for the last time. In March 1939 the German army marched into Prague and, with his last force, Leopold arranged the papers for his daughters to go to London. It was too late for him, despite having arranged a stay in Canada. He was arrested by the SS and died in 1941 in the concentration camp in Teresenstadt. Two sisters, Jenni and Irma, also ended in a camp. Jenni survived, but became mentally ill and committed suicide in 1964, while Irma didn't make it from thecamp at all. Ludwig Kollin helped Spielmann to Sweden, but died soon afterwards. Rudolf had lost his last ally. He dreamt of England or America, played innumeral simuls, annotated games and saved every penny for the very expensive passport. He spent all his free time writing the book "Memories of a chess master" (I hope I got it right) and with the money from it he intended to buy a ticket to America. But in those days, Sweden was living in terror from Hitler's invasion. A part of the Swedish chess federation was pro-nazi, and the presence of a Jewish master was not appreciated. So, the publishing of his book was delayed year after year... His hope was slowly dying. One day, at the end of August 1942, he just locked himself in his room and didn't come out for about a week. When the neighbours finally called the police and they broke in, they found Spielmann's body, perobably starved to death. The medical report states, that he suffered from a heart attack, but there were talks of a more tragic end... This is a heart-breaking story of one of the best players of his day, and also of a wonderful human-being, one of the many who suffered such a fate in that time. |
|
Jul-20-05 | | 810609: <The Alchemist> sorry but did he really move to Prague in 1934? Wasn´t that city Vienna? In 1918 Prague became capital of Czechoslovak Republic and was fully independent from Austria. |
|
Jul-20-05
 | | TheAlchemist: <810609> That was about Rudolf's brother Leopold. Rudolf was living in Vienna at the time, you're right. I'm sorry if it was somewhat ambiguous. |
|
Aug-24-05
 | | ray keene: eric schiller who is currently in london at simpsons directing the staunton memorial tournament is reissuing his book on spielmann and i am helping him-we wd very much like to quote some of the opinions and info here on spielmann -esp <alchemist> we will give a credit of course where necessary-if anyone objects pls let me know--meanwhile we are also desperately searching for the full crosstables of two spielmann victories baden 1914 and goteborg 1939 where he shared 1st prize with flohr-can anyone help us find them?? |
|
Aug-24-05
 | | ray keene: here is the new foreword to eric schillers book-learn to attack with rudolf spielmann-it comes in two parts rudolph spielmann was one of that group of great masters,which included nimzowitsch, alekhine and rubinstein , players, whose careers were scarred by the violent political and social upheavals of the first half of the twentieth century. all four were born into the relative security and prosperity of late 19th century europe, yet all had to face , in varying degrees, the horrors of the first world war, the russian revolution, the collapse of the habsburg empire and the nazi persecution of the jews. alexander alekhine, the only one of the quartet to become world champion, lost two fortunes and ended his days in penury on the margins of lusitania. akiba rubinstein addressed his personal demons by retreating from his finely crafted jewels of chess irridescence into a private world of madness and isolation. when the myrmidons of the nazi schutzstaffeln eventually arrived to haul the aged jewish grandmaster from his asylum to the death camps,the old man was so patently insane that they turned on their heels and abandoned the attempt. aron nimzowitsch had the pleasure, not to mention the courage, to expel a high ranking uniformed nazi official from the press centre of the 1934 alekhine v bogolyubov world championship match in germany. the nazi lacked accreditation and nimzo, as press chief, was well within his rights.however, the irony, and the attendant peril, of a jew in 1930's germany throwing out a member of the ruling party was not lost on the assembled press corps. fortunately, the natural instinct of the nazi beamte to obey apparently even higher authority prevailed, and the intruder left without incident.yet within months of this glorious act of self assertion, nimzowitsch, his health undermined by the deprivations of the first world war and his flight from his native latvia, was dead, before he had reached the age of fifty. |
|
Aug-24-05
 | | ray keene: new intro to eric schillers book continued
rudolph spielmann rose to prominence in the leisured tournaments of the europe of the habsburgs and the hohenzollerns, at a time when standard dress for the games was frock coat, wing collar and smartly polished boots. the young austrian excelled when gambit play was prescribed by the tournament regulations, but, as proven by his result in the elite tournament of san sebastian 1912, spielmann could also hold his own with the best in the tough grind of normal competition.with the advent of the first world war and the collapse of his world as he had known it, spielmanns results became wildly erratic. triumphs , such as stockholm 1919, and teplitz-schonau 1922, alternated with appalling disasters, as at carlsbad 1923, where spielmann finished in irretrievably last place. a further string of mediocre results in baden baden,marienbad and moscow left the chess world doubting whether spielmanns talent had seriously survived the dissolution of the old habsburg empire, to which he had belonged, but now the austrian grandmaster was to produce a coup de theatre which silenced his critics and assured himself a place at the top table of chess for virtually the next decade.at the tournament of semmering 1926, in his home country, spielmann unleashed the result of his life, storming ahead of alekhine and a galaxy of grandmasters, whilst inflicting defeat on his close rivals such as nimzowitsch, vidmar and tartakower. as a direct result of this triumph, spielmann was to become an indispensable invitee to a whole sequence of grand events: new york 1927, berlin and bad kissingen 1928, carlsbad 1929-where his second prize and defeat of capablanca might be considered superior even to the semmering performance-san remo 1930, bled 1931, matches in 1932 against alekhines world title contenders euwe and bogolyubov ,and finally a creditable appearance at moscow 1935. here he held up well against most of the new soviet generation of masters-his debacle against botvinnik being the one notable exception. even in 1938 spielmann was able to finish an undefeated second to alekhine himself at margate, while at gothenburg the following year he tied with salo flohr ( the official fide challenger for the world title) for first place, again undefeated. an important component of spielmanns career was match play. indeed, records indicate that he was perhaps the most prolific match player of any great master. spielmann was a specialist in the short match, contests often consisting of six games, and usually no more than ten.during his career spielmann was involved in no fewer than 47 of such personal duels,which may well be the world record for a grandmaster. as spielmann approached his 60th year the disaster of national socialism and its hatred of the jewish race reduced his homeland of austria to a territory which was no longer tenable for him.flee or face the concentration camp was his stark choice. as it was, spielmann sought refuge in sweden, the home of so many of his triumphs,but upheaval, deprivation and disillusionment soon exacted their toll. born in 1883, spielmann died in stockholm in september 1942-his gravestone reading: "RASTLOS FLYKTING, HART SLAGEN AV ODET"
a fugitive without rest, struck hard by fate.
fortunately spielmann the creative spirit has triumphed over nazi hatred , prejudice and oppression. his games and comments live on and many of the best are enshrined as a perpetual memorial for those aggressive players willing to embrace the austrian grandmasters philosophy of sacrifice and attack. "the glowing power of the sacrifice is irresistible: enthusiasm for sacrifice lies in mans nature." rudolph spielmann the art of sacrifice in chess 1935
|
|
Aug-24-05 | | Resignation Trap: <ray keene> The Baden 1914 tournament crosstable can be found here: http://www.rogerpaige.me.uk/Tournam... . I also have the Jack Spence books which were written about Spielmann many years ago. |
|
Aug-30-05
 | | TheAlchemist: <ray keene> Sorry for not answering for so long, I was away. I have no problem with you publishing any information I have written, the problem is, it is a roughly translated article from GM Georg Mohr, who writes for the Slovenian chess monthly Sahovska misel (Chess thought). The article above is from the September 2002 issue, and I don't know about all the legal procedure in such a case. I suggest you contact mr. Mohr himself on <georg.mohr@siol.net> and ask him for permission, or information about his sources. |
|
Sep-10-05
 | | keypusher: Re the bio, according to his best games collection Tartakower beat Spielmann in a match in 1913. |
|
Sep-11-05
 | | ray keene: it is often told that spielmann was a gambit player who converted to 1d4 and used it to notch up a huge success at karlsbad 1929. he shared second place behind nimzowitsch with capablanca, but in the process he defeated capablanca and won many fine games. i have been looking at spielmanns wins from karlsbad 1929 and it looks almost as if spielmann found a new way to play that somehow rejuvenated his fighting spirit.the elements were 1 try to castle queen side whenever possible
2 occupy the q6 square (d3 or d6 depending on whether he was white or black) with a piece, preferably a rook. spielmann castled q side against nimzowitsch capablanca johner colle samisch and sir george thomas he played r-q6 (rd3 as black--rd6 as white) against maroczy capablanca and nimzowitsch--against colle i think it was he planted a n on d6. i dont think anyone has pointed out this consistency before or how the same ideas kept on cropping up in his games from that event. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 10 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|