chessgames.com

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Amber Tournament (Blindfold) Tournament

Vladimir Kramnik6.5/11(+2 -0 =9)[view games]
Veselin Topalov6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[view games]
Levon Aronian6.5/11(+2 -0 =9)[view games]
Alexander Morozevich6.5/11(+4 -2 =5)[view games]
Viswanathan Anand6/11(+3 -2 =6)[view games]
Peter Leko6/11(+2 -1 =8)[view games]
Magnus Carlsen6/11(+4 -3 =4)[view games]
Sergey Karjakin5/11(+1 -2 =8)[view games]
Loek Van Wely5/11(+2 -3 =6)[view games]
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov4.5/11(+2 -4 =5)[view games]
Vassily Ivanchuk4.5/11(+1 -3 =7)[view games]
Boris Gelfand3/11(+0 -5 =6)[view games]

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Anand vs Kramnik ½-½23 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)C42 Petrov Defense
2. Topalov vs Leko 1-045 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)E06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
3. Mamedyarov vs Morozevich ½-½71 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)D07 Queen's Gambit Declined, Chigorin Defense
4. Aronian vs Van Wely ½-½31 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)D39 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin, Vienna Variation
5. Carlsen vs Ivanchuk 0-153 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)C80 Ruy Lopez, Open
6. Gelfand vs Karjakin 0-146 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)A07 King's Indian Attack
7. Anand vs Mamedyarov ½-½46 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)B04 Alekhine's Defense, Modern
8. Morozevich vs Topalov 1-034 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)D31 Queen's Gambit Declined
9. Kramnik vs Leko ½-½25 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)B10 Caro-Kann
10. Karjakin vs Aronian ½-½49 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)C64 Ruy Lopez, Classical
11. Van Wely vs Carlsen 0-126 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)E36 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
12. Ivanchuk vs Gelfand ½-½57 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)C48 Four Knights
13. Van Wely vs Ivanchuk  ½-½26 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)D11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
14. Carlsen vs Karjakin 1-044 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)B92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
15. Aronian vs Gelfand ½-½53 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)D10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
16. Mamedyarov vs Kramnik ½-½29 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)C43 Petrov, Modern Attack
17. Topalov vs Anand ½-½59 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)E06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
18. Leko vs Morozevich  ½-½32 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)B44 Sicilian
19. Kramnik vs Morozevich 1-057 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)E51 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3
20. Mamedyarov vs Topalov 0-128 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)B18 Caro-Kann, Classical
21. Anand vs Leko ½-½33 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)B18 Caro-Kann, Classical
22. Aronian vs Carlsen ½-½105 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)E06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
23. Karjakin vs Ivanchuk  ½-½41 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)B42 Sicilian, Kan
24. Gelfand vs Van Wely 0-138 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)A07 King's Indian Attack
25. Van Wely vs Karjakin  ½-½30 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)A29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 52 OF 52 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-27-08  Karpova: <hovik2003: So now only Kramnik can be a sole winner if he wins in blindfold.> Today's round started earlier - Kramnik already drew Karjakin.
Mar-27-08  percyblakeney: Topalov did well to share first in the blindfold section, he didn't have much luck with the computer failure against van Wely and missing some wins in earlier rounds, as in the amazing missed mates game against Carlsen.
Mar-27-08  minasina: Rapid LIVE GAMES about to start NOW. See
Amber Tournament (Rapid) (2008)

http://www.amberchess2008.com/pgnvi...
http://www.amberchess2008.com/

Mar-27-08  hovik2003: <Karpova>
So Aronian should buy a drink for Karjakin!
Mar-27-08  mikejaqua: So there's a four-way tie for first in the blindfold. Anyone know if they use a tiebreaker system?
Mar-27-08  Knight13: Poor Gelfand, doing sooo well in this tournament.
Mar-27-08  Karpova: <Levon Aronian is the glorious winner of the 17th Amber Blindfold and Rapid Tournament. The 25-year-old Armenian already secured first place in the rapid section and overall tournament victory in yesterday’s round. Today he drew both his games against Peter Leko to finish on 14½ points.

The blindfold competition ended in a four-way tie for first. Aronian, Kramnik, Morozevich and Topalov all scored 6½ points from 11 games.

In the overall standings four players finished in second place. According to the Sonneborn-Berger tiebreak Vladimir Kramnik won second prize, while Peter Leko took third prize. The tiebreak decided on the trophies, the prize-money for second place Kramnik and Leko shared with Veselin Topalov and Magnus Carlsen.> http://www.amberchess2008.com/

Mar-27-08  percyblakeney: Not much separating Kramnik and Morozevich in blindfold chess over the years.

First places in the blindfold section in Amber:
Morozevich 4 in 7 starts
Kramnik 7 in 14 starts

Head to head:
+2 -2 =2

Elo performance up until 2008:
Morozevich 2874
Kramnik 2821

The biggest difference between them is their results against the other players to have reached first at least three times in the blindfold section.

Against Anand:
Morozevich: 5-0
Kramnik: 4-3

Against Topalov:
Morozevich: 4-1
Kramnik: 3-3

Mar-27-08  slomarko: <Elo performance up until 2008: Morozevich 2874
Kramnik 2821 >

i'd say +53 points at that level is a collosal difference.
Mar-27-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: Cmón percy , I may say that <slomarko> has got a point here.
Mar-27-08  chessmoron: The +53 point gap doesn't really mean anything since Moro is 0-2 in Blindfold play against Kramnik's comeback.
Mar-27-08  KamikazeAttack: Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. ~Aaron Levenstein

Having said that it is safe and accurate to say that Kramnik has the best achievement in blindfold chess. He has won the strongest blindfold competition more than anyone and he is still winning it.

Mar-27-08  slomarko: eh no. Morozevich has a higher winning, percentage, a higher performance rating and a higher points scoring percentage. so he's the boss. Kramnik is number 2
Mar-27-08  KamikazeAttack: <Kramnik is number 2>

I'll say he is number 4.

Mar-28-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  hedgeh0g: No wins for Gelfand and a final score of 3/11...ouch!
Mar-28-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: <percyblakeney: Kramnik's latest blindfold loss was actually three whole years ago, so to get a winning position against him with black wasn't bad, even if it doesn't exactly change the result.>

Yes, that Carlsen is one impressive chess player. He beat Kramnik using the Black pieces at Corus and here at the Amber Blindfold event Carlsen gets another winning position with the Black pieces against Kramnik. And blindfold is supposed to be Kramnik's forte!

Mar-29-08  KamikazeAttack: <He beat Kramnik using the Black pieces at Corus and here at the Amber Blindfold event Carlsen gets another winning position with the Black pieces against Kramnik. And blindfold is supposed to be Kramnik's forte!>

Yeah, I agree too that Carlsen has now proven beyond doubt that he is in fact much stronger than Kramnik.

Mar-29-08  Xaurus: <Yeah, I agree too that Carlsen has now proven beyond doubt that he is in fact much stronger than Kramnik.>

I think using the term "much stronger" is somewhat misleading, or, optimistic.

I think Carlsen is perhaps the strongest elite player except for Anand and Kramnik.

When he sorts out his problems, like those he gets when facing certain players (like Leko or Anand), and if he can improve his opening skills, he will become the strongest player in the world.

Right now he must be one of the best endgame players, and that is no small achievement at 17 years of age.

Just try to count the number of games he has saved because of his endgame skills. You won't be able to calculate that far. :P

Seriously though, he shouldn't need to make these miracle saves if he would play the opening/early middlegame better.

Mar-29-08  Blackreptile: a lot of comments on the results of the players of this tournament but strangely enough very few on the amazing victory of Aronian who dominated clearly all the world champions and young or not geniuses.In any case, after his rankings in Corus, Linares and Nice it will be time to re-assess the evaluation of the strongest players of the world.
Mar-29-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  rogge: I believe the new april FIDE ratings pretty much reflects the actual strength of the top players. In order Anand, Kramnik, Moro, Topalov, Carlsen, Aronian.
Mar-29-08  Blackreptile: yes you are right but remember that the Amber tournament does not count for official rating.Aronian would be better placed.may be a specialist of Elo could calculate what the ranking would be if the last Amber counted normally?
Mar-29-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  rogge: My guess is that Aronian would be 3rd, moving Moro, Topa and Carlsen one place down.
Mar-30-08  Davolni: <Kamikazeattack><Yeah, I agree too that Carlsen has now proven beyond doubt that he is in fact much stronger than Kramnik>

Tell me you ARE joking!!!!!

You gotta be dreaming!!!

<much stronger> !!!! LOL, that's a BIG LOL right there!!!

Mar-30-08  Augalv: <<Kamikazeattack><Yeah, I agree too that Carlsen has now proven beyond doubt that he is in fact much stronger than Kramnik>

Are you kidding ?!

Oct-31-08  you vs yourself: Really cool videos from opening and closing ceremonies here: http://www.macauleypeterson.com/Bio...
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 52)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 52 OF 52 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies