chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

FSR
Member since Aug-27-05 · Last seen Oct-11-25
I am Frederick Rhine. The United States Chess Federation awarded me the titles of National Master (at OTB chess) in 1983, and Senior Master of Correspondence Chess in 1997. In February 2024, less than a year after I began playing in the ICCF, it awarded me the title of Correspondence Chess Master. It looks like later this year I will qualify for the title of International Correspondence Chess Master.

As of September 2025, I am the second highest rated USCF correspondence chess player, just three rating points behind Gordon Magat. https://www.uschess.org/assets/top_...

The August 2020 issue of Chess Life magazine had a profile of me (for the text, see Frederick Rhine (my August 1, 2020 comment in the forum)).

I played in the 1997 USCF Absolute Championship (open to the top 13 correspondence players who accept their invitations), scoring 6-6 (+2 =8 -2). The late Alex Dunne wrote in his book on the Absolute Championships, "This was Rhine's only Absolute and he held his own against the best. His two losses were against previous Absolute winners." http://bit.ly/1NB55YP That book contains my games F Rhine vs R Lifson, 1997 and F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997.

But the 1997 event was not my only Absolute. I have also played in the 2023-25 events. In the 2023 edition, I drew all 12 games. That was enough to tie for second! Unlike the 1997 event, this one was under ICCF auspices and allowed the use of engines. There was only one decisive game! https://www.iccf.com/event?id=101114 In the 2024 Absolute, I have ten draws and a win(!), with just one game left, which will very likely be drawn. https://www.iccf.com/event?id=105325 This time +1 will probably only be enough to tie for fourth. In the 2025 Absolute, I have drawn all twelve games. So far there are no decisive games in the event.

I have played first board for the Rogue Squadron in the Chicago Industrial Chess League. I have played online for the Shropshire & Friends team in the 4 Nations Chess League (4NCL), and the Oswestry team in the Shropshire League.

I attended Lane Technical High School in Chicago with the late Chessgames.com co-founder Alberto A Artidiello until he moved out of Chicago. Lane's chess team won the Illinois state championship my junior and senior years, becoming the first school ever to win consecutive championships. Albert also became a master, as did my teammates Kenneth Mohr and Christopher Kus. The late FIDE Masters Albert Charles Chow and Morris Giles were also Laneites.

In July 2013, I played in my second and third regular-rated tournaments of the millennium(!), the Greater Midwest Classic and the Chicago Class (under-2200 section). I tied for second, undefeated, in both, winning $700 and $550, respectively, and brought my rating back over 2200. http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j... http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j...

I have contributed to hundreds of chess-related articles on Wikipedia under the handle Krakatoa, notably "First-move advantage in chess," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-... "George H. D. Gossip," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George... and "Swindle (chess)," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_..., all of which are almost entirely written by me. The first two of those have been Today's Featured Article, the highest honor a Wikipedia article can receive, one attained by about one out of every 1,400 articles. I have received various Wikipedia awards, including the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels and the Timeless Imperial Triple Crown (which only 12 Wikipedians have received). My user page is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:K.... Al Lawrence in the aforementioned Chess Life article referred to my "erudite chess articles on Wikipedia." Chess historian Edward Winter in his article "Wikipedia and Chess" commended my Wikipedia articles on Gossip and Hugh Edward Myers. (The latter article is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_....) https://www.chesshistory.com/winter...

I am the editor and proofreader of the book "Tournament Battle Plan: Optimize Your Chess Results!" by Daniel Gormally. I was the proofreader of the book "Triple Exclam!!! The Life and Games of Emory Tate, Chess Warrior" by Daaim Shabazz.

I was a contributor to the now-defunct Chicago Chess Blog, http://chicagochess.blogspot.com. I discovered, and documented in my blog post https://chicagochess.blogspot.com/2..., what Taylor Kingston calls "the Mortimer Effect," which has lowered the Morphy Numbers of many modern players (maybe you!). https://chesscafe.com/the-skittles-... I have a Morphy Number of 4 by virtue of L Barden vs F Rhine, 2010 as well as two simul games I lost to Arthur Bisguier when I was in high school.

Six hundred and forty-four of my games are in chessgames.com's database. My favorites are F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981, K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992, and F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996, each of which has been Game of the Day. Rhine-Sprenkle was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 32) and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (2nd ed.) at 183 n.19). In Volume 33 of Chess Informant, my 18th move (18.Nxd6!) in that game was voted the 8th-9th most important theoretical novelty in Volume 32. The game was also cited in MCO-13 and "The Aggressive Nimzowitsch Sicilian 2...Nf6" by Eric Schiller, and occupies an entire chapter in all three editions of "Beating the Sicilian" by John Nunn. It is game 218 in "1000 TN!! The Best Theoretical Novelties" (Chess Informant, 2012). Anish Giri, in his 2023 Chessable course "Lifetime Repertoires: Giri's 1. e4 - Part 3" recommends this line for White. https://www.chessable.com/lifetime-... Following my game against Sprenkle, he writes after 22.Be3, "The computer evaluates this as completely hopeless for Black and it is. Our king is in fact much safer, thanks to our much better pieces." https://www.chessable.com/learn/159... More than 40 years after I played the game, my line still kicks ass!


click for larger view

Thompson-Rhine was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 57), and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (3rd ed.) at 172 n.163). Jeremy Silman discusses the game and my analysis of it in his book "Winning with the Sicilian Defence" (2nd ed.).

Probably the best game I have ever played is the astonishing F Rhine vs B Lemke, 2025, but it's too deep for me to understand. It was an ICCF game and I was greatly assisted by Stockfish 17.1 (which is legal on ICCF). I doubt that any unaided human could have played that game.

Joel Johnson in his book "Attacking 101: Volume #005" says of my blitz game F Rhine vs NN, 2019, "White played a flawless Smith-Morra Gambit that IM Marc Esserman would have been proud of." Georges Koltanowski published F Rhine vs A Artidiello, 1974 in his syndicated newspaper column. Richard Palliser discusses the opening of F Rhine vs S Nagle, 1997 in his book "tango!"

I have played some theoretically significant correspondence games in the Damiano Variation of Petroff's Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 Nxe4!?), demonstrating that Black's third move, commonly regarded as a blunder, is fully playable. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/che... Nikolaos Ntirlis analyzes two of my games in an article on the variation in Volume 158 of Chess Informant. Cyrus Lakdawala and Carsten Hansen include five of my games in their book on the line, "None Shall Pass: The Unbeatable Damiano Petroff: A tricky and surprisingly solid defense."

Jacob Aagaard analyzes the endings of two of my Internet blitz games in his 896-page tome "A Matter of Endgame Technique" (alas, mine was lacking). Cyrus Lakdawala includes my study-like win in F Rhine vs A Zhao, 2019 in his book "Tactical Training in the Endgame." He also mentions me, albeit not by name, in his book "In the Zone: The Greatest Winning Streaks in Chess History" when he refers to "The Classical Sicilian, which as one of my atheist students told me, is the closest thing he has to a religion." Cyrus analyzes my game against Gadir Guseinov in his book "The Makogonov Variation: A ruthless King's Indian killer."

Commentator Mato Jelic somewhat extravagantly calls my game E Sollano vs F Rhine, 1977 "The Greatest Ever Blitz Game Played in Chicago." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl8... See also Suren's analysis at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWa... My 7...Bxc5!! in that game, played the year before Boris Avrukh was born, is a big improvement on the flaccid 7...Bg6, his recommendation in the book "Beating 1.d4 Sidelines" (2012).

Someone also made a video (moves only) of J Aagaard vs F Rhine, 2021, a 2-1 bullet game where I drew and should've beaten the grandmaster - if only I'd had time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-O... Someone else (or perhaps two different people) did a video (moves only) of Tal vs F Rhine, 1988, my loss to the great Mikhail Tal in a simul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfk... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3o... The latter refers to me as a "great grandmaster!" which isn't quite accurate . . .

User: JimmyVermeer discusses my games NN vs F Rhine, 2021, P Pantelidakis vs F Rhine, 1974, and P Napetschnig vs F Rhine, 1977 in his video "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 10 of 11." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GT... The sequel "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 11 of 11," contains a Fool's Mate I played, which I had mentioned in a comment on this site. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0Z... Napetschnig-Rhine is also mentioned in https://www.chess.com/terms/fools-m.... Rick Kennedy discusses my game F Rhine vs NN, 2018 on his Jerome Gambit blog. https://jeromegambit.blogspot.com/2... My game F Rhine vs NN, 2010 is mentioned in the "Checkmate Patterns Course" by Raf Mesotten and John Bartholomew on chessable.com.

I composed this study, which Pal Benko published in "Benko's Bafflers" in Chess Life, May 2006:

White to play and draw


click for larger view

The solution is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stale... It is based on an earlier study of mine, also published in Benko's column. Both compositions also appear in Harold van der Heijden's endgame study database. https://www.chess.com/news/view/76-... The above study is also cited in "The Complete Chess Swindler" by David Smerdon and "Rewire Your Chess Brain: Endgame Studies and Mating Problems to Enhance Your Tactical Ability" by Cyrus Lakdawala.

I was once one of the world's best players at suicide chess (also known as "losing chess"), a chess variant where one wins by giving away all of one's pieces. http://perpetualcheck.com/antichess...

I have successfully submitted 240 puns for Game of the Day. Game Collection: Puns I submitted. User: johnlspouge has remarked, "As far as I can tell, <FSR> is churning out 'actual puns' almost as fast as I can [insert bodily function of choice]." K Tjolsen vs S Marder, 2010. The coveted 2013 Caissar for Best (Worst) Pun went to "Control-Ault-Delete," the pun I submitted for Fischer vs R Ault, 1959, the Game of the Day on December 19, 2012. I won the 2019 Caissar in the same category for my greatest pun ever (and IMO one of the greatest chessgames puns ever) "Late December Back in '63: What a Lady, What a Knight!," N Littlewood vs B Brinck-Claussen, 1963, the Game of the Day on December 30, 2019. Since Caissars are awarded in January, my wins may illustrate recency bias.

Nine of my games have been Game of the Day: NN vs F Rhine, 1977 ("Strangers on a Train"), F Rhine vs F Lasch, 1986 ("Lasch Call"), K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992 ("Like a Rhinestone Cowboy"), R Delaune vs F Rhine, 1997 ("Red Red Rhine"), F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997 ("Fred Rhine Felled"), F Felecan vs F Rhine, 2019 ("Felecan Brief"), F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981 ("Sparkling Rhine"), F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996 ("Das Rhinegold"), and F Rhine vs NN, 2018 ("'Twas the Night Before Christmas"). Six wins, a draw, and two losses.

I am responsible for World Junior Championship (1957), Vidmar Memorial (1969), Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014), Game Collection: Drawing lines, and 32nd Correspondence World Championship (2020), among others. Legendary chess journalist Leonard Barden recently told me in an email, "I follow your many thoughtful contributions to chessgames.com with interest."

I am a member of the ChessBookie Hall of Fame, having finished fourth in the Summer 2015 Leg, seventh in the Winter 2016 Championship Leg, ninth in the Winter 2017 Championship Leg, ninth in the Spring 2017 Leg, and seventh in the Summer 2017 Leg.

I am very active on Chessable, where my handle is "Krakatoa." https://www.chessable.com/profile/K... I am a "Legend" and have 134 badges, five shy of the world record held by Maestro. https://www.chessable.com/badges/Ma...

>> Click here to see FSR's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   FSR has kibitzed 30785 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Oct-11-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
FSR: Oh, FFS. <While Floyd lay on his chest with his cheek to the ground, Chauvin knelt on his neck.[21] Floyd stopped moving around 8:20, though he was still conscious.[15] : 4:10  Multiple witnesses began to film the encounter, and their videos circulated widely on the ...
 
   Oct-11-25 Portoroz Interzonal (1958)
 
FSR: <avenant69: . . . Fischer, who systematically drew against the top dogs but crushed the lesser ones> Fischer later honed rabbit-bashing to an art form. At the Stockholm Interzonal (1962) , he scored +3=8 against the players who finished 2nd through 12th, but +10=1 against the ...
 
   Oct-11-25 B Gurgenidze vs Klovans, 1959 (replies)
 
FSR: Very sweet. I saw Bxh6, but not the follow-up.
 
   Oct-11-25 FSR chessforum
 
FSR: Submitted: [Event "2nd DSM 0-2750 G (BUL)"] [Site "ICCF"] [Date "2025.08.10"] [EventDate "2025.08.10"] [Round "-"] [White "Rhine, Frederick"] [Black "Mondry, Matthias"] [ECO "B31"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [WhiteElo "2349"] [BlackElo "2390"] [Source " ...
 
   Oct-10-25 M Chan vs F Rhine, 2025 (replies)
 
FSR: <Sally Simpson> I'm not sure.
 
   Oct-10-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
FSR: Wow. The Cubs beat the Brewers 6-0 to tie the series.
 
   Oct-10-25 A Karklins vs G Small, 1986
 
FSR: Karklins is good at trapping queens. The month before, he played A Karklins vs Dlugy, 1986 .
 
   Oct-08-25 Yermolinsky vs Kudrin, 2000
 
FSR: Hard to believe this game. 11.O-O-O?? (the only instance of this move in the database) is madness, and I can't believe that Yermolinsky played it, or that Kudrin failed to win against it. Circa 1980, the young Albert Charles Chow did something very similar against Jammie Gregory, who ...
 
   Oct-08-25 J Engel vs I Zuyev, 2019
 
FSR: An odd little game. Not surprisingly, 11.f4? was never seen again.
 
   Oct-08-25 R Har-Zvi vs N Nikolic, 1993
 
FSR: Probably the moves 6.Nc3 d6 were omitted. It's unlikely that Har-Zvi hung a pawn with 6.Be2? and Nikolic didn't take it.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 39 OF 156 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-02-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WCC Editing Project: <FSR> Aha, I think I know what's happened- sorry about that.

I've just sent you an email explaining my confusion on this.

I feel quite embarrassed. You might have forgotten my email address, but it's

jessicafischerqueen@yahoo.com

The reason I post it is that just in case my email hits your "spam filter" or something- I hope you can get my email.

<retired from Wikipedia>

I can't say I blame you on that.

Aug-02-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <WCC E P> No problem. I see from your e-mail that I did edit the Wikipedia article on Tal with a couple suggestions of yours from Sosonko's book "Russian Silhouettes." That was over two years ago and I'd forgotten. I pride myself on my memory, but it's not infallible.
Aug-02-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WCC Editing Project: Good grief what a relief- thanks for your quick reply.

I was horrified I'd made a serious gaffe, as I explained in my email.

Aug-06-13  Tomlinsky: A birthday pressie!...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLKk...

Aug-15-13  Shams: <FSR>: I'm not getting anything against the darn main line Chigorin in my blitz games*. What is the stem game in your opening book for this variation? I'm ending up with lots of center pawns and the bishop pair, but it's not bearing fruit. Only a few trials so far, but it's frustrating.

*I'm calling this the main line: <3.Nf3 Bg4 4.cd Bf3 5.gf3 Qd5 6.e3 e5 7.Nc3 Bb4 8.Bd2 Bc3 9.bc3 Nf6 10.c4 Qd6 11.d5 Ne7> etc.

Aug-15-13  Shams: Maybe I'll just play <4.Nc3>. This game looks simple and convincing:

Kramnik vs Short, 2008

Aug-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> I've always played 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 dxc4 5.e4 Bg4 6.Be3 e6 7.Bxc4 Bb4 8.Qc2! and Black can't take the pawn because of 8...Bxf3 9.gxf3 Nxd4?? 10.Bxd4 Qxd4 11.Qa4+.

If instead 3...dxc4, 4.Nf3 (Kaufman prefers 4.d5 and accepting the knight sac if Black plays 4...Na5) Bg4?! (4...Nf6 transposes to the above line) 5.d5 Bxf3 6.exf3 Ne5 7.Bf4 Ng6 8.Bxc4!, which I've played more than once, is very strong.

However, I see that White doesn't seem to score very well in my main line if Black just plays 8...0-0. So maybe I'll have to try something else. Kaufman likes 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.Nf3 Bg4 6.e4 Nxc3 7.bxc3 e6 8.Rb1. However, he says that both 5...e5!? and 5...Nxc3 6.bxc3 e5 are probably preferable to 5...Bg4 and 5...Bf5. Schandorff likes 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 dxc4 5.Bg5, which seems to score well for White (although not so much on CG.com's database), so I may give that a try. His stem game is http://www.365chess.com/game.php?gi....

Aug-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Submitted:

[Event "Bundesliga 0405"]
[Site "Germany"]
[Date "2004.12.12"]
[EventDate "2004.11.12"]
[Round "6.7"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Schandorff, Lars"]
[Black "Willsch, Matthias"]
[ECO "D07"]
[WhiteElo "2510"]
[BlackElo "2250"]
[PlyCount "81"]

1. d4 d5 2. c4 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 dxc4 5. Bg5 h6 6. Bxf6 exf6 7. e3 Bd6 8. Bxc4 O-O 9. Qc2 a6 10. a3 f5 11. O-O Qf6 12. Rad1 Re8 13. Rfe1 Bd7 14. b4 g5 15. Bf1 g4 16. Nd2 h5 17. Nc4 Ne7 18. e4 fxe4 19. Nxe4 Qg6 20. Bd3 Qh6 21. Ncxd6 cxd6 22. Qc7 Ba4 23. Nxd6 Bxd1 24. Nxe8 Rxe8 25. Rxe7 Rxe7 26. Qxe7 Qd2 27. Qe3 Qb2 28. Bc4 Ba4 29. h3 gxh3 30. gxh3 Qb1+ 31. Kh2 Qc2 32. Bd5 Bc6 33. Qg5+ Kf8 34. Bxc6 bxc6 35. Qc5+ Qxc5 36. dxc5 Ke7 37. Kg3 Ke6 38. Kf4 Kd5 39. Kg5 Kc4 40. Kxh5 Kb3 41. h4 1-0

Aug-16-13  Shams: <FSR> Interesting lines. Note that I'm still playing <1.Nf3> and getting into the Chigorin through transposition, so I can't play <3.Nc3>. I'll try the Kramnik-Short line or that Schandorff variation. Thanks.
Aug-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Ah, the dreaded move order issues. You probably won't be able to get into the Schandorff line either, because Black will meet 1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nc6 3.c4 with 3...Bg4 rather than 3...Nf6 or 3...dxc4. I would be tempted to try 3.Bf4 rather than 3.c4, though it's no refutation.

I prefer 1.d4 to 1.Nf3 because it keeps open the option of a lot of lines where White plays f3 and/or Nge2 rather than Nf3, or delays the development of the king knight. These include the QGD Exchange, the Saemisch King's Indian, and 2.Bg5 against the Dutch. Note that 3.Nc3! scores much better against the Chigorin than 3.Nf3. Opening Explorer But 1.Nf3 does allow you to avoid the evil Benko Gambit and the Nimzo. (It also avoids the Budapest, Albin, and Englund gambits, but you should be happy to allow those.) Alas, there's no perfect solution.

Aug-16-13  Shams: <FSR> Actually, the Albin isn't necessarily avoided. A strong player played this against me in blitz the other day:

<1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 Nc6 3.c4> So far, our Chigorin. But now Black uncorked: <3...e5!?>. I stupidly took on d5 and lost like a patzer. Looking up the line after I learned that it's the little-known Lazard Gambit. After White correctly takes on e5 Black has his Albin if he wants it, I believe.

But the line has independent significance, viz. <4.de Bb4+ 5.Bd2 dc 6.e3 Be6!?> (6...Qe7 a stodgier option) <7.Qa4 Bxd2 8.Nxd2 a6 9.Nd4 b5 10.Nxc6 Qd7 11.Nb8!>:


click for larger view

Now Black has tried 11...Qc8 and 11...Rxb8, in neither case leveling the game. But one Mr. Charles Galofre recommends 11...Qxd2+ instead, claiming equality.

http://www.chesscafe.com/text/horiz...

Aug-16-13  Shams: Oops, my diagram is off by a half-move: it's the position after Black's 10th.
Aug-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Good point. Often in the Chigorin ...e5, "Albinizing" the position, is a possibility for Black. But note that 4.Nxe5 is also an option for White. It scores better in Mega Database 2013 than 4.dxe5 (59.5% in 63 games, versus 55.4% in 166 games with 4.dxe5). More importantly, I think (particularly given the small sample sizes), Houdini 3 likes it significantly better (+0.62 for 4.Nxe5 versus +0.38 for 4.dxe5).
Aug-16-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Incidentally, after 4.Nxe5 Nxe5 5.dxe5 d4, Houdini likes 6.e3 (not mentioned by Gallimaufry, er, I mean Charles Galofre) better than 6.g3. Note that with White's knight gone from g1, the Lasker Trap doesn't work: 6...Bb4+ (6...Bc5(!) 7.Na3 dxe3 8.Qxd8+ Kxd8 9.Bxe3 Bxe3 10.fxe3 c6 11.c5 favors White (+0.39 - though note that Houdini gave 4.Nxe5 +0.62, so its evaluation is going down as it goes deeper, and it's now basically identical to its assessment of 4.dxe5)) 7.Nd2! dxe3 8.Qa4+! Bd7 9.Qxb4 (+0.90).
Aug-21-13  Shams: What do you play against <1.b3>?
Aug-21-13  hedgeh0g: <Shams: What do you play against <1.b3>?>

Have you tried 1...e5? :P

Aug-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <Shams> I use 1...b6
Aug-21-13  hedgeh0g: ...b6 is certainly a good choice if you're simply looling to avoid prepared lines and play a game, but I believe ...e5 is a better try if you're looking to equalise quickly or play for a win. Positionally, it makes sense to play against the fianchettoed bishop by shoring up the e-pawn (like in the b3 Sicilian).

I'm typing this from my phone, so I won't link the game, but take a look at Larsen - Spassky 1970 (I think). Should be #2 in Spassky's list of <Notable Games>.

Aug-21-13  Shams: <hedgeh0g> But note that far from shoring up his e-pawn, Spassky pushes it to e4 on move four in that game.

You're probably right about 1...e5, it's just a move I've never really played. Still, it's principled and all that.

Aug-21-13  hedgeh0g: <Shams> Yeah, but it was pushed to e4 in response to provocative play from Larsen. Anyway, I was mainly giving the game as the most memorable example of success with 1...e5. 1.b3!? is uncommon at higher levels of play, so I can't recall any good examples of Black wins in the "main lines".

The most challenging (and logical) approach for White would simply be to play to undermine the e5-pawn, for example: 1.b3 e5 2.Bb2 Nc6 (2...d6 seems passive) 3.Bb5, but Black can play 3...Bd6! followed by castling and ...Re8 and, provided he can maintain his control over e5, he should be fine. As you said, it's the most principled continuation, but it might be better to simply play symmetrically with 1...b6 if you suspect your opponent has something up his sleeve.

Aug-21-13  hedgeh0g: But it's definitely worth checking out 1.b3 as a blitz weapon. Most people won't have much experience playing against it and will likely adopt some passive formation with 1...e5 and 2...d6, hemming in the bishop and giving White an easy game.
Aug-24-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> The theoretically approved line, which I would probably play, is 1.b3 e5 2.Bb2 Nc6 3.e3 Nf6 4.Bb5 Bd6!? (discouraging 5.Bxc6 dxc6) 5.Na3 (intending Nc4; on 5.Nf3, e4 6.Nd4 (6.Nh4 0-0) Nxd4 7.Bxd4 0-0) Na5!? Black scores almost 2/3, although in a tiny sample (19 games in Mega). If 5...Na5 is too weird for you, 5...a6 is played almost as often and has scored even better for Black.

And yeah, if your opponent plays as in Larsen vs Spassky, 1970, play like Spassky. I vaguely recall a game Ove Kroll - Jeremy Silman, U.S. Open 1979, where Kroll (a Dane) improved on Larsen's play (on move 7 or thereafter) and drew. Sorry, I don't recall what the improvement was. 6.Nf5, as in Rybka vs Fruit, 2008 (1-0, 91), is also possible. Houdini says that Black is .3 better after 6.Nxc6 dxc6, and .25 better after 6.Nf5.

<hedgeh0g> I used to play 1.b3 quite a bit in blitz, with good success. Relatedly, I want to study the English Defense, 1.c4 b6, which I think is a good choice against a lower-rated player. Short seems to be quite fond of it. E.g., V Pechenkin vs Short, 2012; R Dimitrov vs Short, 2012; N Miezis vs Short, 2012 (Miezis is a GM). V Mikhalevski vs Short, 2013 was less successful, but Mikhalevski is no rabbit.

Aug-24-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I just ordered the "English Defence" DVD by Dejan Bojkov. It seems to have gotten good reviews.
Aug-24-13  Shams: <FSR> Thanks. If ...Bd6 is good enough for you and <hedgeh0g> I'll take it up.

I've played a bit of the English Defense. Every time I'm about ready to give it up, I notch another brilliancy and it keeps me coming back. :)

The Two Pawn Attack (c4 and e4 but not d4) is the one that has given me the most trouble, though Daniel King in his book on the opening doesn't think it's any kind of try for advantage. The line that comes closest to being a theoretical refutation is the early a3, preventing ...Bb4. But I do fine with just ...f7-f5 etc.

Here's a fun blitz game I had about a month ago in a more common English Defense line. King's 8...f4!? is quite interesting (perhaps not his move but his book is what made me aware of it.) White handled it quite poorly as you can see, making three or four dubious moves before getting a strategically lost position.

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game...

Aug-24-13  Shams: Also this is a dangerous gambit line (if you don't already know it):

Panno vs Miles, 1979
J Manion vs Shabalov, 1994

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 156)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 39 OF 156 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC