chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

FSR
Member since Aug-27-05 · Last seen Oct-11-25
I am Frederick Rhine. The United States Chess Federation awarded me the titles of National Master (at OTB chess) in 1983, and Senior Master of Correspondence Chess in 1997. In February 2024, less than a year after I began playing in the ICCF, it awarded me the title of Correspondence Chess Master. It looks like later this year I will qualify for the title of International Correspondence Chess Master.

As of September 2025, I am the second highest rated USCF correspondence chess player, just three rating points behind Gordon Magat. https://www.uschess.org/assets/top_...

The August 2020 issue of Chess Life magazine had a profile of me (for the text, see Frederick Rhine (my August 1, 2020 comment in the forum)).

I played in the 1997 USCF Absolute Championship (open to the top 13 correspondence players who accept their invitations), scoring 6-6 (+2 =8 -2). The late Alex Dunne wrote in his book on the Absolute Championships, "This was Rhine's only Absolute and he held his own against the best. His two losses were against previous Absolute winners." http://bit.ly/1NB55YP That book contains my games F Rhine vs R Lifson, 1997 and F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997.

But the 1997 event was not my only Absolute. I have also played in the 2023-25 events. In the 2023 edition, I drew all 12 games. That was enough to tie for second! Unlike the 1997 event, this one was under ICCF auspices and allowed the use of engines. There was only one decisive game! https://www.iccf.com/event?id=101114 In the 2024 Absolute, I have ten draws and a win(!), with just one game left, which will very likely be drawn. https://www.iccf.com/event?id=105325 This time +1 will probably only be enough to tie for fourth. In the 2025 Absolute, I have drawn all twelve games. So far there are no decisive games in the event.

I have played first board for the Rogue Squadron in the Chicago Industrial Chess League. I have played online for the Shropshire & Friends team in the 4 Nations Chess League (4NCL), and the Oswestry team in the Shropshire League.

I attended Lane Technical High School in Chicago with the late Chessgames.com co-founder Alberto A Artidiello until he moved out of Chicago. Lane's chess team won the Illinois state championship my junior and senior years, becoming the first school ever to win consecutive championships. Albert also became a master, as did my teammates Kenneth Mohr and Christopher Kus. The late FIDE Masters Albert Charles Chow and Morris Giles were also Laneites.

In July 2013, I played in my second and third regular-rated tournaments of the millennium(!), the Greater Midwest Classic and the Chicago Class (under-2200 section). I tied for second, undefeated, in both, winning $700 and $550, respectively, and brought my rating back over 2200. http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j... http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j...

I have contributed to hundreds of chess-related articles on Wikipedia under the handle Krakatoa, notably "First-move advantage in chess," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-... "George H. D. Gossip," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George... and "Swindle (chess)," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_..., all of which are almost entirely written by me. The first two of those have been Today's Featured Article, the highest honor a Wikipedia article can receive, one attained by about one out of every 1,400 articles. I have received various Wikipedia awards, including the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels and the Timeless Imperial Triple Crown (which only 12 Wikipedians have received). My user page is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:K.... Al Lawrence in the aforementioned Chess Life article referred to my "erudite chess articles on Wikipedia." Chess historian Edward Winter in his article "Wikipedia and Chess" commended my Wikipedia articles on Gossip and Hugh Edward Myers. (The latter article is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_....) https://www.chesshistory.com/winter...

I am the editor and proofreader of the book "Tournament Battle Plan: Optimize Your Chess Results!" by Daniel Gormally. I was the proofreader of the book "Triple Exclam!!! The Life and Games of Emory Tate, Chess Warrior" by Daaim Shabazz.

I was a contributor to the now-defunct Chicago Chess Blog, http://chicagochess.blogspot.com. I discovered, and documented in my blog post https://chicagochess.blogspot.com/2..., what Taylor Kingston calls "the Mortimer Effect," which has lowered the Morphy Numbers of many modern players (maybe you!). https://chesscafe.com/the-skittles-... I have a Morphy Number of 4 by virtue of L Barden vs F Rhine, 2010 as well as two simul games I lost to Arthur Bisguier when I was in high school.

Six hundred and forty-four of my games are in chessgames.com's database. My favorites are F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981, K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992, and F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996, each of which has been Game of the Day. Rhine-Sprenkle was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 32) and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (2nd ed.) at 183 n.19). In Volume 33 of Chess Informant, my 18th move (18.Nxd6!) in that game was voted the 8th-9th most important theoretical novelty in Volume 32. The game was also cited in MCO-13 and "The Aggressive Nimzowitsch Sicilian 2...Nf6" by Eric Schiller, and occupies an entire chapter in all three editions of "Beating the Sicilian" by John Nunn. It is game 218 in "1000 TN!! The Best Theoretical Novelties" (Chess Informant, 2012). Anish Giri, in his 2023 Chessable course "Lifetime Repertoires: Giri's 1. e4 - Part 3" recommends this line for White. https://www.chessable.com/lifetime-... Following my game against Sprenkle, he writes after 22.Be3, "The computer evaluates this as completely hopeless for Black and it is. Our king is in fact much safer, thanks to our much better pieces." https://www.chessable.com/learn/159... More than 40 years after I played the game, my line still kicks ass!


click for larger view

Thompson-Rhine was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 57), and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (3rd ed.) at 172 n.163). Jeremy Silman discusses the game and my analysis of it in his book "Winning with the Sicilian Defence" (2nd ed.).

Probably the best game I have ever played is the astonishing F Rhine vs B Lemke, 2025, but it's too deep for me to understand. It was an ICCF game and I was greatly assisted by Stockfish 17.1 (which is legal on ICCF). I doubt that any unaided human could have played that game.

Joel Johnson in his book "Attacking 101: Volume #005" says of my blitz game F Rhine vs NN, 2019, "White played a flawless Smith-Morra Gambit that IM Marc Esserman would have been proud of." Georges Koltanowski published F Rhine vs A Artidiello, 1974 in his syndicated newspaper column. Richard Palliser discusses the opening of F Rhine vs S Nagle, 1997 in his book "tango!"

I have played some theoretically significant correspondence games in the Damiano Variation of Petroff's Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 Nxe4!?), demonstrating that Black's third move, commonly regarded as a blunder, is fully playable. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/che... Nikolaos Ntirlis analyzes two of my games in an article on the variation in Volume 158 of Chess Informant. Cyrus Lakdawala and Carsten Hansen include five of my games in their book on the line, "None Shall Pass: The Unbeatable Damiano Petroff: A tricky and surprisingly solid defense."

Jacob Aagaard analyzes the endings of two of my Internet blitz games in his 896-page tome "A Matter of Endgame Technique" (alas, mine was lacking). Cyrus Lakdawala includes my study-like win in F Rhine vs A Zhao, 2019 in his book "Tactical Training in the Endgame." He also mentions me, albeit not by name, in his book "In the Zone: The Greatest Winning Streaks in Chess History" when he refers to "The Classical Sicilian, which as one of my atheist students told me, is the closest thing he has to a religion." Cyrus analyzes my game against Gadir Guseinov in his book "The Makogonov Variation: A ruthless King's Indian killer."

Commentator Mato Jelic somewhat extravagantly calls my game E Sollano vs F Rhine, 1977 "The Greatest Ever Blitz Game Played in Chicago." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl8... See also Suren's analysis at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWa... My 7...Bxc5!! in that game, played the year before Boris Avrukh was born, is a big improvement on the flaccid 7...Bg6, his recommendation in the book "Beating 1.d4 Sidelines" (2012).

Someone also made a video (moves only) of J Aagaard vs F Rhine, 2021, a 2-1 bullet game where I drew and should've beaten the grandmaster - if only I'd had time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-O... Someone else (or perhaps two different people) did a video (moves only) of Tal vs F Rhine, 1988, my loss to the great Mikhail Tal in a simul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfk... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3o... The latter refers to me as a "great grandmaster!" which isn't quite accurate . . .

User: JimmyVermeer discusses my games NN vs F Rhine, 2021, P Pantelidakis vs F Rhine, 1974, and P Napetschnig vs F Rhine, 1977 in his video "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 10 of 11." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GT... The sequel "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 11 of 11," contains a Fool's Mate I played, which I had mentioned in a comment on this site. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0Z... Napetschnig-Rhine is also mentioned in https://www.chess.com/terms/fools-m.... Rick Kennedy discusses my game F Rhine vs NN, 2018 on his Jerome Gambit blog. https://jeromegambit.blogspot.com/2... My game F Rhine vs NN, 2010 is mentioned in the "Checkmate Patterns Course" by Raf Mesotten and John Bartholomew on chessable.com.

I composed this study, which Pal Benko published in "Benko's Bafflers" in Chess Life, May 2006:

White to play and draw


click for larger view

The solution is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stale... It is based on an earlier study of mine, also published in Benko's column. Both compositions also appear in Harold van der Heijden's endgame study database. https://www.chess.com/news/view/76-... The above study is also cited in "The Complete Chess Swindler" by David Smerdon and "Rewire Your Chess Brain: Endgame Studies and Mating Problems to Enhance Your Tactical Ability" by Cyrus Lakdawala.

I was once one of the world's best players at suicide chess (also known as "losing chess"), a chess variant where one wins by giving away all of one's pieces. http://perpetualcheck.com/antichess...

I have successfully submitted 240 puns for Game of the Day. Game Collection: Puns I submitted. User: johnlspouge has remarked, "As far as I can tell, <FSR> is churning out 'actual puns' almost as fast as I can [insert bodily function of choice]." K Tjolsen vs S Marder, 2010. The coveted 2013 Caissar for Best (Worst) Pun went to "Control-Ault-Delete," the pun I submitted for Fischer vs R Ault, 1959, the Game of the Day on December 19, 2012. I won the 2019 Caissar in the same category for my greatest pun ever (and IMO one of the greatest chessgames puns ever) "Late December Back in '63: What a Lady, What a Knight!," N Littlewood vs B Brinck-Claussen, 1963, the Game of the Day on December 30, 2019. Since Caissars are awarded in January, my wins may illustrate recency bias.

Nine of my games have been Game of the Day: NN vs F Rhine, 1977 ("Strangers on a Train"), F Rhine vs F Lasch, 1986 ("Lasch Call"), K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992 ("Like a Rhinestone Cowboy"), R Delaune vs F Rhine, 1997 ("Red Red Rhine"), F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997 ("Fred Rhine Felled"), F Felecan vs F Rhine, 2019 ("Felecan Brief"), F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981 ("Sparkling Rhine"), F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996 ("Das Rhinegold"), and F Rhine vs NN, 2018 ("'Twas the Night Before Christmas"). Six wins, a draw, and two losses.

I am responsible for World Junior Championship (1957), Vidmar Memorial (1969), Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014), Game Collection: Drawing lines, and 32nd Correspondence World Championship (2020), among others. Legendary chess journalist Leonard Barden recently told me in an email, "I follow your many thoughtful contributions to chessgames.com with interest."

I am a member of the ChessBookie Hall of Fame, having finished fourth in the Summer 2015 Leg, seventh in the Winter 2016 Championship Leg, ninth in the Winter 2017 Championship Leg, ninth in the Spring 2017 Leg, and seventh in the Summer 2017 Leg.

I am very active on Chessable, where my handle is "Krakatoa." https://www.chessable.com/profile/K... I am a "Legend" and have 134 badges, five shy of the world record held by Maestro. https://www.chessable.com/badges/Ma...

>> Click here to see FSR's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   FSR has kibitzed 30781 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Oct-11-25 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
FSR: <Representative Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) has defended the Capitol Police officer who shot rioter Ashli Babbitt, parting with former President Donald Trump's version of events. Speaking on C-Span for its January 6 Views From the House show, ahead of its Sunday release, Rep. Mullin ...
 
   Oct-11-25 Portoroz Interzonal (1958)
 
FSR: <avenant69: . . . Fischer, who systematically drew against the top dogs but crushed the lesser ones> Fischer later honed rabbit-bashing to an art form. At the Stockholm Interzonal (1962) , he scored +3=8 against the players who finished 2nd through 12th, but +10=1 against the ...
 
   Oct-11-25 B Gurgenidze vs Klovans, 1959 (replies)
 
FSR: Very sweet. I saw Bxh6, but not the follow-up.
 
   Oct-11-25 FSR chessforum
 
FSR: Submitted: [Event "2nd DSM 0-2750 G (BUL)"] [Site "ICCF"] [Date "2025.08.10"] [EventDate "2025.08.10"] [Round "-"] [White "Rhine, Frederick"] [Black "Mondry, Matthias"] [ECO "B31"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [WhiteElo "2349"] [BlackElo "2390"] [Source " ...
 
   Oct-10-25 M Chan vs F Rhine, 2025 (replies)
 
FSR: <Sally Simpson> I'm not sure.
 
   Oct-10-25 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
FSR: Wow. The Cubs beat the Brewers 6-0 to tie the series.
 
   Oct-10-25 A Karklins vs G Small, 1986
 
FSR: Karklins is good at trapping queens. The month before, he played A Karklins vs Dlugy, 1986 .
 
   Oct-08-25 Yermolinsky vs Kudrin, 2000
 
FSR: Hard to believe this game. 11.O-O-O?? (the only instance of this move in the database) is madness, and I can't believe that Yermolinsky played it, or that Kudrin failed to win against it. Circa 1980, the young Albert Charles Chow did something very similar against Jammie Gregory, who ...
 
   Oct-08-25 J Engel vs I Zuyev, 2019
 
FSR: An odd little game. Not surprisingly, 11.f4? was never seen again.
 
   Oct-08-25 R Har-Zvi vs N Nikolic, 1993
 
FSR: Probably the moves 6.Nc3 d6 were omitted. It's unlikely that Har-Zvi hung a pawn with 6.Be2? and Nikolic didn't take it.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 40 OF 156 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-25-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Thanks. Yes, I've seen the gambit, but I confess that I myself am not booked up on how to play against the English Defense as White. (Though I rarely encounter it, since I usually play 1.d4, and respond to 1...b6 and 1...e6 with 2.e4!)

Nice game against tactico_11. You really should submit it to CG.com. Don't be modest; it's <way> better than a lot of games played and submitted by members.

I can see that it's got to be confusing for White if he hasn't studied the English Defense. Mednis in his book <How to Be a Complete Tournament Player> discusses a game where Igor Ivanov IIRC played the English Defense against him. Mednis wasn't sure what to do, played weakly, and lost in 13 moves or something. I'm guessing that it was probably the shortest loss of his adult life.

Aug-25-13  Shams: <FSR> That game of mine was only 5/0; I'd never submit such a game. When I beat a master OTB in a game I'm proud of I'll submit it.

Let me know what you think of the Bojkov DVD. I found only one game of his using the defense:

http://www.365chess.com/view_game.p...

I can't find that Mednis game. I'm curious about it. I'd think the only way for a GM to lose that quickly against 1.c4 b6 would be to build a big center and try to refute Black's play directly; while not being an inherently flawed idea this of course is just what Black is hoping for.

Aug-25-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> I misremembered a bit. It was Psakhis, not Ivanov. Mednis vs Psakhis, 1989 And although Mednis got a lost game in record time (I think now that he said something like, "After just 11 moves, I'm dead lost."), it turns out that he didn't actually resign at that point. He didn't give the rest of the game, so I hadn't known that he'd played on for as long as he did.
Aug-25-13  Shams: Ahh yes. <5.d5> is not a good move; in fact it's a singleton in the database. But 5.ef would have given White a good game. The best try today is considered to be 4...Nc6 ∆ ...Nb4 and winning the bishop pair.
Aug-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Of course Mednis knew that 5.exf5! was the theoretical move, and considered favorable for White, but he hadn't studied it and was loath to sac a rook to go into a line he didn't know and his opponent (a strong GM, the joint USSR Champion in 1980-81 (with some guy named Kasparov)) did know.
Aug-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Cleaning up the house, I found the scoresheet of this game:

[Event "Gompers Park Fall Championship"]
[Site "Chicago"]
[Date "1986.10.10"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Rhine, Frederick"]
[Black "Czerniecki, K.A."]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E83"]
[PlyCount "67"]

<1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. f3> I knew that Czerniecki played the King's Indian and had prepared the Saemisch against it. Ken Walter: "I like the Saemisch, but sometimes I play the Differentisch for a change." <5...O-O 6. Be3 Nc6 7. Qd2 e5 8. d5 Nd4 9. Nge2 Nd7?>


click for larger view

An unsound pawn sacrifice. Best is 9...Nxe2 10.Bxe2 Nh5 11.g3 Bd7 12.O-O Qe7 13.Rac1 a6 14.Rfe1 Nf6 15. Bg5 Rad8 16.a3 Rde8 17.Bf1 Rb8 18. b3 Rfc8 19. Red1 Re8 +0.49 Houdini 3. <10.Nxd4 cxd4 11.Bxd4 Ne5 12.Be2> (12.0-0-0) <12...f5 13. f4! > Weaker is 13. O-O f4!, anchoring the knight. <13...Bh6 14.O-O a6 15.Be3 Ng4 16.Bxg4 fxg4 17.e5 Bf5 18.Ne2 Qe7 19. Ng3 Bg7 20. e6 c5 21. Nxf5 Rxf5 22. Rac1 b5> 22...a5, trying to keep the position closed, is a better try.


click for larger view

<23. b4!> Ripping open the queenside. Weaker is 23. b3? b4!) <23...bxc4 24.Rxc4 Qb7 25.bxc5! Rxd5> (25... Qxd5 26.Qxd5 Rxd5 27.c6 ) <26. c6! Qb5 27.Qc2 Rc8 28.Rb1 Qa5 29.Ra4 Qd8 30.Qc4! Rb8 31.Rc1> (31.Rxb8 Qxb8 32.c7 also wins, but why give Black any play at all?) <31...Rbb5 32.c7 Qc8 33.Qc6 Rbc5 34.Bxc5 1-0> Gompers Park Chess Club in Chicago was founded in the late 1950s, before I was born. I won this tournament, its final championship, with a 5-0 score.

Aug-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Submitted:

[Event "Gompers Park Fall Championship"]
[Site "Chicago"]
[Date "1986.10.10"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Rhine, Frederick"]
[Black "Czerniecki, K"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E83"]
[PlyCount "67"]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.f3 O-O 6.Be3 Nc6 7.Qd2 e5 8.d5 Nd4 9.Nge2 Nd7 10.Nxd4 cxd4 11.Bxd4 Ne5 12.Be2 f5 13.f4 Bh6 14.O-O a6 15.Be3 Ng4 16.Bxg4 fxg4 17.e5 Bf5 18.Ne2 Qe7 19.Ng3 Bg7 20.e6 c5 21.Nxf5 Rxf5 22.Rac1 b5 23.b4 bxc4 24.Rxc4 Qb7 25.bxc5 Rxd5 26.c6 Qb5 27.Qc2 Rc8 28.Rb1 Qa5 29.Ra4 Qd8 30.Qc4 Rb8 31.Rc1 Rbb5 32.c7 Qc8 33.Qc6 Rbc5 34.Bxc5 1-0

Comment: Black is K Czerniecki.

Aug-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Another:

[Event "Gompers Park Fall Championship"]
[Site "Chicago"]
[Date "1986.10.03"]
[EventDate "1986.10.03"]
[Round "1"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Rhine, Frederick"]
[Black "Lasch, Frank"]
[ECO "A60"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "59"]

1.d4 e6 2.e4 c5 3.d5 d6 4.c4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.Bd3 Nbd7 7.Nf3 Bg7 8.h3 O-O 9.O-O a6 10.Be3 Ne8 11.Qd2 Nc7 12.a4 Ne5 13.Nxe5 Bxe5 14.f4 Bg7 15.f5 gxf5 16.exf5 Bd7 17.fxe6 fxe6 18.Bg5 Qe8 19.Rxf8+ Bxf8 20.Ne4 Bg7 21.Nf6+ Bxf6 22.Bxf6 Qh5 23.g4 Qf7 24.Qg5+ Kf8 25.Qh6+ Kg8 26.Rf1 Ne8 27.Qg5+ Ng7 28.Bc3 h6 29.Qxh6 Nf5 30.Qh8# 1-0

Aug-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Submitted:

[Event "simultaneous exhibition"]
[Site "Chicago"]
[Date "1988.03.16"]
[EventDate "1988.03.16"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Tal, Mikhail"]
[Black "Rhine, Frederick"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D42"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "113"]

1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. c4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 6. Nf3 Be7 7. cxd5 Nxd5 8. Bd3 Nc6 9. O-O O-O 10. Re1 Bf6 11. a3 Nxd4 12. Nxd4 Bxd4 13. Bxh7+ Kxh7 14. Qxd4 Nxc3 15. Qxc3 Bd7 16. Bf4 Bc6 17. Qg3 Qf6 18. Re5 Kg8 19. Rg5 Qh6 20. Be5 f6 21. Rg6 Qh7 22. Bxf6 Qxg6 23. Qxg6 Rxf6 24. Qd3 Raf8 25. f3 R6f7 26. Rd1 Bd5 27. Rc1 a6 28. Qe3 Rf6 29. Rc7 Rg6 30. Kf2 Rgf6 31. Qc3 Rg6 32. Rc8 Rgf6 33. Rxf8+ Rxf8 34. Qc5 Rf7 35. h4 Rf4 36. Qe7 Rf7 37. Qd6 Rf6 38. Ke3 Rf5 39. Qe7 Rf7 40. Qc5 Rf5 41. a4 Bc6 42. Qe7 Bd5 43. h5 Rf7 44. Qh4 Rf6 45. a5 Kh7 46. Qg4 Bc6 47. f4 Be8 48. Qh4 Bc6 49. g4 Bd5 50. Qg5 Bc6 51. Qe5 Bd5 52. Qc7 Kg8 53. g5 Rf7 54. Qd6 Rf5 55. g6 Rf8 56. Qd7 Bc6 57. Qc7 1-0

Aug-26-13  hedgeh0g: <FSR> I couldn't help but notice that 8-move victories against Class P opposition are conspicuously absent among the gamescores you've posted.
Aug-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <hedgeh0g> Well, in fairness, there is the 10-move NN vs F Rhine, 2013, but I like to think that it has at least some theoretical value. I operate on the theory that since I'm no Fischer people don't want to see every single game I've played, so every game I post should be interesting to the reader for some reason - typically because it's well played by one or both sides, features a nice combination or opening trap, or (in the case of the Tal game) is against a player so celebrated that people <are> interested in seeing practically anything he plays.
Aug-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR>: Same here-I have selectively submitted games, but will generally not waste time on first-round mismatches or any of that sort of stuff. Would prefer some of my more interesting losses to stronger players.

A while back, I submitted two games from the 1984 Greater Boston Open, in which I scored +2-1=1, and they were the two games I did not win. One of the wins was mainly due to weak play from my ~2000 opponent; the other may yet find its way to CG, though hardly a model of theory-that 2100 opponent played an Accelerated Dragon, got easy equality and IIRC, I outplayed him later on.

Aug-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I have thumbed through about 30% of GM John Shaw's <The King's Gambit> (Quality Chess - and it is indeed), which I received in the mail yesterday. Simply an amazing book! Far and away the greatest King's Gambit book ever, and surely at least one of the greatest opening books. (Offhand, I'm not sure what the competition would be for the latter honor.)

As for its length, I'm sure Shaw could easily have gotten to 1000 pages. Believe it or not, he had to exercise considerable editorial discretion to keep it down to <only> 680 (653 + indexes). For example, fans of the Bishop's Gambit and Muzio won't be happy: he just explains why they suck (3...Nc6! with advantage in all lines in the former, 9...Qf5! in the latter) and moves on. Ditto for the Allgaier and Professor Rice's brainchild, of course. And there are a lot of sidelines where he basically says "yes, this is playable" and goes on to more theoretically critical lines.

To my surprise, Shaw is <not> a big fan of the Kieseritzky, which I had thought was close to obligatory for White. He says yes, it's perfectly playable, but 4...g4 5.Ne5 d6! and 5...Nc6! both lead to boring equality. He prefers the Quaade Gambit, 4.Nc3! After a simul last year, Larry Christiansen told us that 4.Nc3! is the move, so I find Shaw's claim less surprising/eccentric than I otherwise would.

Here is a gem in the Quaade Gambit:

<1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Nc3 g4> Natural, but not best. Sakaev's 4...Nc6 is OK. Most challenging is 4...Bg7 5.d4! (after 5.g3!? d5!N (Aagaard), White pretty much has to play the dubious piece sac 6.d4! dxe4 7.Nxe4 g4 8.Bxf4 gxf3 9.Qxf3) g4 6.Bc4 gxf3 7.Qxf3 - a similar sac, but here Shaw thinks White has enough compensation, especially OTB. <5.Ne5 Qh4+ 6.g3! fxg3 7.Qxg4>


click for larger view

<7...g2+?> 7...Qxg4! 8.Nxg4 d5! 9.Ne5!? reaches an ending where White is a pawn down, but has some chances for advantage. <8.Qxh4 gxh1(Q) 9.Qh5!> Reaching a well-known position where Black is a rook up but almost lost; Shaw says that with best play he can reach a bad position a pawn down. <9...Bd6?> 9...Nh6! (box) leads to the aforementioned line. <10.Qxf7+ Kd8 11.d4 Ne7 12.Bg5 Nbc6 13.Nd5!> The "most stylish"; "13.0-0-0 should also get the job done." <13...Qe4+ 14.Be2 Qh1+ 15.Kd2 Qxa1>


click for larger view

Shaw: "White to play and win beautifully (ugly wins don't count)."

<16.Qe8+!!> 16.Nxc6+?? mates ugly, albeit equally quickly. <16...Kxe8 17.Nf6+ Kf8 18.Bh6#> Jesus Seoane Sepulveda - Ignacio Prieto, Cadiz 1986.

"Games like this are why the King's Gambit has fanatical supporters. Sure, there will be days when White loses a pawn down in an ending, but there will also be days when the black king is filleted by a flurry of sacs."

Certainly any King's Gambit fan or potential fan should buy this book instantly. If I were an 1.e4 e5 player I'd certainly get it as well.

Aug-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR: To my surprise, Shaw is <not> a big fan of the Kieseritzky, which I had thought was close to obligatory for White. He says yes, it's perfectly playable, but 4...g4 5.Ne5 d6! and 5...Nc6! both lead to boring equality....>

Even in the 1990s, the main line of the Kieseritzky was held to give White full compensation for the pawn, but no more. By then, that other great specialist in the gambit, Heikki M J Westerinen, had turned to 3.Bc4 in search of an elusive advantage.

When I played the KG on occasion in the late 1990s, don't recall what I would have used after 3....g5, because I never faced it.

Back in the day, I always played Becker's 3....h6 to reach the Classical Defence while not allowing White the chance of playing the Kieseritzky, at the suggestion of Sir Philip Stuart Milner-Barry, in his annotations to M Yeo vs Milner-Barry, 1977 which were published in the January 1978 issue of the BCM. He noted that his old sparring partner Conel Hugh O'Donel Alexander employed 3....h6 and that he could never find a way to take advantage of it.

<....He prefers the Quaade Gambit, 4.Nc3! After a simul last year, Larry Christiansen told us that 4.Nc3! is the move, so I find Shaw's claim less surprising/eccentric than I otherwise would.>

Most interesting-I am unfamiliar with the Quaade, but it is worth a look.

Aug-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: btw, you may wonder who Quaade was. Shaw explains, "Hooper & Whyld inform me that Quaade was a 19th century Dutch sea-captain who advocated 4.Nc3. I wish to follow Captain Quaade's lead." Shades of Captain William Davies Evans. If 4.Nc3 catches on, 19th-century European sea captains will have invented two of the most important gambit lines after 1.e4 e5. Alas, no scion of Columbia Law School has had such a lasting impact on opening theory, although Isaac Leopold Rice tried mightily. http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...
Aug-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR>: In <Championship Chess>, Sergeant noted that Blackburne referred to the Rice Gambit as 'Tapioca'.

Tapioca pudding is good stuff-strikes me that is not altogether bad.

Aug-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <perfidious> I agree. If the Rice Gambit were as enjoyable to play as tapioca is to eat, we'd see a lot more of it.
Aug-28-13  hedgeh0g: <FSR> Thanks for that post on the King's Gambit. Like you, I also assumed the Kieseritzky was more or less obligatory for White, but now I really have to take a look at 4.Nc3!?

Speaking of the King's Gambit, I've always found 3...d6! difficult to meet as White. I recently started looking at alternative approaches to the "mainline" and discovered a very interesting variation:

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d6 4.Bc4 h6 <5.b3!?> Nc6 6.Bb2 Nf6 7.Qe2 Be7 8.Nc3, preparing 0-0-0 and White has some clear positional compensation for the pawn, in my opinion. The position bears a striking similarity to a Catalan, only in reverse. I've played my system a couple of times in blitz now with success (most importantly, I've been happy with the positions I get out of the opening), which is quite likely compounded by the fact that Black players facing this system will probably be caught off-guard.

Aug-28-13  hedgeh0g: As a side note, I would encourage anyone looking to improve their game to consider studying gambits and employing them in their own play. It's an excellent way to become acquainted with the concept of rapid development and knowledge of common tactical themes/traps is always useful.

Blitz play is particularly useful in this regard, because the games are essentially throwaway, leaving plenty of room for experimentation and "honing" your openings before employing them in a more formal setting.

(Yeah, I'm talking to you, Mr. "1.Nf3"!)

Aug-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <hedgeh0g: As a side note, I would encourage anyone looking to improve their game to consider studying gambits and employing them in their own play. It's an excellent way to become acquainted with the concept of rapid development and knowledge of common tactical themes/traps is always useful. Blitz play is particularly useful in this regard, because the games are essentially throwaway, leaving plenty of room for experimentation and "honing" your openings before employing them in a more formal setting.>

I completely agree. I used to shun the King's Gambit, Smith-Morra Gambit etc., in <any> kind of play, because they were "incorrect." Maybe they are, maybe not. But if one doesn't care if one loses, why not? So I played a bunch of online games last year with those openings.

<(Yeah, I'm talking to you, Mr. "1.Nf3"!)>

I assume you mean <Shams>? He can speak for himself, of course, but my understanding is that he has played the King's Gambit, at least in blitz, even 3.Kf2?! Qh4+ 4.g3 fxg3+ 5.Kg2.

Aug-28-13  Shams: I certainly encourage my students to play gambits, for the reasons <hedgeh0g> mentions. And I'm not averse to them myself, at all. There are Reti lines where White sacrifices a pawn that are great fun.

Yes, I've played the Tumbleweed a half-dozen times, but I played (and even studied a tiny bit) the <3.Bc4> KGA for about three years. It's just that I no longer wish to play <1.e4>, so that takes away a lot of gambit opportunities.

The one I really miss is the Alekhine-Chatard Attack. That is a fun line for sure.

Aug-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <hedgeh0g> I've also played b3 lines in response to ...h6 in the King's Gambit. They confuse a lot of people.
Aug-28-13  Shams: <FSR> Does Shaw cover KGD lines at all? I remember being shocked at how little literature there was on it.
Aug-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Sure. He analyzes all reasonable (and some unreasonable) responses to the KG - 2...Bc5, 2...d5, 2...Nf6, 2...Nc6 3.Nf3 f5, 2...d6, 2...c6, 2...f5?!, 2...Qh4+, 2...Qf6, and even 2...Nh6!?
Aug-28-13  Shams: <FSR> I have found <2...Qh4+> to be more resilient than it has any right to be.

I assume Fischer - Wade is still the antidote to <2...Nf6> and Fischer - [Simul Opponent] to <2...f5> (a quick miniature)?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 156)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 40 OF 156 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC