chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

FSR
Member since Aug-27-05 · Last seen Sep-03-25
I am Frederick Rhine. The United States Chess Federation awarded me the titles of National Master (at OTB chess) in 1983, and Senior Master of Correspondence Chess in 1997. In February 2024, less than a year after I began playing in the ICCF, it awarded me the title of Correspondence Chess Master. It looks like later this year I will qualify for the title of International Correspondence Chess Master.

As of August 2025, I am the second highest rated USCF correspondence chess player, just three rating points behind Gordon Magat. https://www.uschess.org/assets/top_...

The August 2020 issue of Chess Life magazine had a profile of me (for the text, see Frederick Rhine (my August 1, 2020 comment in the forum)).

I played in the 1997 USCF Absolute Championship (open to the top 13 correspondence players who accept their invitations), scoring 6-6 (+2 =8 -2). The late Alex Dunne wrote in his book on the Absolute Championships, "This was Rhine's only Absolute and he held his own against the best. His two losses were against previous Absolute winners." http://bit.ly/1NB55YP That book contains my games F Rhine vs R Lifson, 1997 and F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997.

But the 1997 event was not my only Absolute. I have also played in the 2023-25 events. In the 2023 edition, I drew all 12 games. That was enough to tie for second! Unlike the 1997 event, this one was under ICCF auspices and allowed the use of engines. There was only one decisive game! https://www.iccf.com/event?id=101114 In the 2024 Absolute, I have ten draws and a win(!), with just one game left, which will very likely end in a draw. https://www.iccf.com/event?id=105325 This time +1 will probably only be enough to tie for fourth. In the 2025 Absolute, I have eleven draws, with just one game left.

I have played first board for the Rogue Squadron in the Chicago Industrial Chess League. I have played online for the Shropshire & Friends team in the 4 Nations Chess League (4NCL), and the Oswestry team in the Shropshire League.

I attended Lane Technical High School in Chicago with the late Chessgames.com co-founder Alberto A Artidiello until he moved out of Chicago. Lane's chess team won the Illinois state championship my junior and senior years, becoming the first school ever to win consecutive championships. Albert also became a master, as did my teammates Kenneth Mohr and Christopher Kus. The late FIDE Masters Albert Charles Chow and Morris Giles were also Laneites.

In July 2013, I played in my second and third regular-rated tournaments of the millennium(!), the Greater Midwest Classic and the Chicago Class (under-2200 section). I tied for second, undefeated, in both, winning $700 and $550, respectively, and brought my rating back over 2200. http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j... http://www.uschess.org/assets/msa_j...

I have contributed to hundreds of chess-related articles on Wikipedia under the handle Krakatoa, notably "First-move advantage in chess," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-... "George H. D. Gossip," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George... and "Swindle (chess)," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_..., all of which are almost entirely written by me. The first two of those have been Today's Featured Article, the highest honor a Wikipedia article can receive, one attained by about one out of every 1,400 articles. I have received various Wikipedia awards, including the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels and the Timeless Imperial Triple Crown (which only 12 Wikipedians have received). My user page is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:K.... Al Lawrence in the aforementioned Chess Life article referred to my "erudite chess articles on Wikipedia." Chess historian Edward Winter in his article "Wikipedia and Chess" commended my Wikipedia articles on Gossip and Hugh Edward Myers. (The latter article is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_....) https://www.chesshistory.com/winter...

I am the editor and proofreader of the book "Tournament Battle Plan: Optimize Your Chess Results!" by Daniel Gormally. I was the proofreader of the book "Triple Exclam!!! The Life and Games of Emory Tate, Chess Warrior" by Daaim Shabazz.

I was a contributor to the now-defunct Chicago Chess Blog, http://chicagochess.blogspot.com. I discovered, and documented in my blog post https://chicagochess.blogspot.com/2..., what Taylor Kingston calls "the Mortimer Effect," which has lowered the Morphy Numbers of many modern players (maybe you!). https://chesscafe.com/the-skittles-... I have a Morphy Number of 4 by virtue of L Barden vs F Rhine, 2010 as well as two simul games I lost to Arthur Bisguier when I was in high school.

Six hundred and seventeen of my games are in chessgames.com's database. My favorites are F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981, K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992, and F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996, each of which has been Game of the Day. Rhine-Sprenkle was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 32) and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (2nd ed.) at 183 n.19). In Volume 33 of Chess Informant, my 18th move (18.Nxd6!) in that game was voted the 8th-9th most important theoretical novelty in Volume 32. The game was also cited in MCO-13 and "The Aggressive Nimzowitsch Sicilian 2...Nf6" by Eric Schiller, and occupies an entire chapter in all three editions of "Beating the Sicilian" by John Nunn. It is game 218 in "1000 TN!! The Best Theoretical Novelties" (Chess Informant, 2012). Anish Giri, in his 2023 Chessable course "Lifetime Repertoires: Giri's 1. e4 - Part 3" recommends this line for White. https://www.chessable.com/lifetime-... Following my game against Sprenkle, he writes after 22.Be3, "The computer evaluates this as completely hopeless for Black and it is. Our king is in fact much safer, thanks to our much better pieces." https://www.chessable.com/learn/159... More than 40 years after I played the game, my line still kicks ass!


click for larger view

Thompson-Rhine was published with my annotations in Chess Informant (Volume 57), and cited in the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (Vol. B (3rd ed.) at 172 n.163). Jeremy Silman discusses the game and my analysis of it in his book "Winning with the Sicilian Defence" (2nd ed.).

Joel Johnson in his book "Attacking 101: Volume #005" says of my blitz game F Rhine vs NN, 2019, "White played a flawless Smith-Morra Gambit that IM Marc Esserman would have been proud of." Georges Koltanowski published F Rhine vs A Artidiello, 1974 in his syndicated newspaper column. Richard Palliser discusses the opening of F Rhine vs S Nagle, 1997 in his book "tango!"

I have played some theoretically significant correspondence games in the Damiano Variation of Petroff's Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 Nxe4!?), demonstrating that Black's third move, commonly regarded as a blunder, is fully playable. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/che... Nikolaos Ntirlis analyzes two of my games in an article on the variation in Volume 158 of Chess Informant. Cyrus Lakdawala and Carsten Hansen include five of my games in their book on the line, "None Shall Pass: The Unbeatable Damiano Petroff: A tricky and surprisingly solid defense."

Jacob Aagaard analyzes the endings of two of my Internet blitz games in his 896-page tome "A Matter of Endgame Technique" (alas, mine was lacking). Cyrus Lakdawala includes my study-like win in F Rhine vs A Zhao, 2019 in his book "Tactical Training in the Endgame." He also mentions me, albeit not by name, in his book "In the Zone: The Greatest Winning Streaks in Chess History" when he refers to "The Classical Sicilian, which as one of my atheist students told me, is the closest thing he has to a religion." Cyrus analyzes my game against Gadir Guseinov in his book "The Makogonov Variation: A ruthless King's Indian killer."

Commentator Mato Jelic somewhat extravagantly calls my game E Sollano vs F Rhine, 1977 "The Greatest Ever Blitz Game Played in Chicago." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl8... See also Suren's analysis at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWa... My 7...Bxc5!! in that game, played the year before Boris Avrukh was born, is a big improvement on the flaccid 7...Bg6, his recommendation in the book "Beating 1.d4 Sidelines" (2012).

Someone also made a video (moves only) of J Aagaard vs F Rhine, 2021, a 2-1 bullet game where I drew and should've beaten the grandmaster - if only I'd had time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-O... Someone else (or perhaps two different people) did a video (moves only) of Tal vs F Rhine, 1988, my loss to the great Mikhail Tal in a simul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfk... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3o... The latter refers to me as a "great grandmaster!" which isn't quite accurate . . .

User: JimmyVermeer discusses my games NN vs F Rhine, 2021, P Pantelidakis vs F Rhine, 1974, and P Napetschnig vs F Rhine, 1977 in his video "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 10 of 11." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GT... The sequel "The 109 fastest checkmates in chess history, part 11 of 11," contains a Fool's Mate I played, which I had mentioned in a comment on this site. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0Z... Napetschnig-Rhine is also mentioned in https://www.chess.com/terms/fools-m.... Rick Kennedy discusses my game F Rhine vs NN, 2018 on his Jerome Gambit blog. https://jeromegambit.blogspot.com/2... My game F Rhine vs NN, 2010 is mentioned in the "Checkmate Patterns Course" by Raf Mesotten and John Bartholomew on chessable.com.

I composed this study, which Pal Benko published in "Benko's Bafflers" in Chess Life, May 2006:

White to play and draw


click for larger view

The solution is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stale... It is based on an earlier study of mine, also published in Benko's column. Both compositions also appear in Harold van der Heijden's endgame study database. https://www.chess.com/news/view/76-... The above study is also cited in "The Complete Chess Swindler" by David Smerdon and "Rewire Your Chess Brain: Endgame Studies and Mating Problems to Enhance Your Tactical Ability" by Cyrus Lakdawala.

I was once one of the world's best players at suicide chess (also known as "losing chess"), a chess variant where one wins by giving away all of one's pieces. http://perpetualcheck.com/antichess...

I have successfully submitted 238 puns for Game of the Day. Game Collection: Puns I submitted. User: johnlspouge has remarked, "As far as I can tell, <FSR> is churning out 'actual puns' almost as fast as I can [insert bodily function of choice]." K Tjolsen vs S Marder, 2010. The coveted 2013 Caissar for Best (Worst) Pun went to "Control-Ault-Delete," the pun I submitted for Fischer vs R Ault, 1959, the Game of the Day on December 19, 2012. I won the 2019 Caissar in the same category for my greatest pun ever (and IMO one of the greatest chessgames puns ever) "Late December Back in '63: What a Lady, What a Knight!," N Littlewood vs B Brinck-Claussen, 1963, the Game of the Day on December 30, 2019. Since Caissars are awarded in January, my wins may illustrate recency bias.

Nine of my games have been Game of the Day: NN vs F Rhine, 1977 ("Strangers on a Train"), F Rhine vs F Lasch, 1986 ("Lasch Call"), K Thompson vs F Rhine, 1992 ("Like a Rhinestone Cowboy"), R Delaune vs F Rhine, 1997 ("Red Red Rhine"), F Rhine vs D Burris, 1997 ("Fred Rhine Felled"), F Felecan vs F Rhine, 2019 ("Felecan Brief"), F Rhine vs D Sprenkle, 1981 ("Sparkling Rhine"), F Rhine vs A Boerkoel, 1996 ("Das Rhinegold"), and F Rhine vs NN, 2018 ("'Twas the Night Before Christmas"). Six wins, a draw, and two losses.

I am responsible for World Junior Championship (1957), Vidmar Memorial (1969), Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014), Game Collection: Drawing lines, and 32nd Correspondence World Championship (2020), among others. Legendary chess journalist Leonard Barden recently told me in an email, "I follow your many thoughtful contributions to chessgames.com with interest."

I am a member of the ChessBookie Hall of Fame, having finished fourth in the Summer 2015 Leg, seventh in the Winter 2016 Championship Leg, ninth in the Winter 2017 Championship Leg, ninth in the Spring 2017 Leg, and seventh in the Summer 2017 Leg.

I am very active on Chessable, where my handle is "Krakatoa." https://www.chessable.com/profile/K... I am a "Legend" and have 134 badges, five shy of the world record held by Maestro. https://www.chessable.com/badges/Ma...

>> Click here to see FSR's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   FSR has kibitzed 30450 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Sep-03-25 Kenneth Rogoff (replies)
 
FSR: <saffuna> Trump has no idea that France played any role in helping the American colonies defeat the British. He gives all the credit to Washington and his army for ramming the ramparts and seizing the airports.
 
   Sep-03-25 chessgames.com chessforum
 
FSR: This site for some reason is wrecking some URLs, putting spaces and hyphens in them so they don't work. Here are some URLs as wrecked by chessgames: fiercehealthcare.com/providers/cvs-health-walgre- ens-shift-covid-vaccine-policies-providers-say-n- ew-fda-criteria-creates You can see ...
 
   Sep-01-25 FSR chessforum
 
FSR: Submitted: [Event "2nd DSM 0-2750 F (BUL)"] [Site "ICCF"] [Date "2025.08.10"] [Round "-"] [White "Roth, Peter"] [Black "Rhine, Frederick"] [ECO "B67"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [WhiteElo "2352"] [BlackElo "2349"] [Source " https://www.iccf.com/game?id=1565266 "]
 
   Aug-31-25 A Beliavsky vs M Stean, 1982 (replies)
 
FSR: An embarrassing loss for Stean. 9.Nb3 was made famous in the 1972 world championship match between Fischer and Spassky, although it had been played before that. Stean was considered an opening authority, and wrote a book on the Najdorf Sicilian, published in 1976. He was one of ...
 
   Aug-26-25 F Rhine vs B Lemke, 2025
 
FSR: Play continued to be very tricky, but I managed to keep my precious e-pawn and create mating threats with my pieces. Significantly, our bishops were of opposite colors, making it harder for him to defend. Throughout this game, I made Stockfish analyze very deeply, and eventually it ...
 
   Aug-20-25 J Templar vs W Berry, 1890 (replies)
 
FSR: <An Englishman> According to Stockfish 17.1, 4...dxe4 5.Nxe5 Qg5! gives Black a winning advantage. However, the lines are insane and not easy to find over the board, e.g. 6.Qa4 Qxg2! 7.Bxc6+ bxc6 8.Qxc6+ Kd8 9.Rf1 Bh3! 10.Qxa8+ Ke7 11.Kd1 Qxf1+ 12.Kc2 Nh6! 5...Qd5 gives a smaller ...
 
   Aug-19-25 A Seidl vs F Rhine, 2025
 
FSR: A F Dillenburg vs F Rhine, 2025 began with the same 24 moves, but my opponent played on rather than offering a draw. We nonetheless reached an equal ending and agreed to a draw a few moves later.
 
   Aug-19-25 M Ly vs Dubov, 2015
 
FSR: Moulthun analyzes this game at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNe...
 
   Aug-17-25 Hempel vs Eger, 1986
 
FSR: Eger to Please.
 
   Aug-17-25 P Smith vs Fischer, 1956
 
FSR: Where did this game come from? I'd never seen it before. Pat Smith has no other games in the database.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 53 OF 155 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-28-14  hedgeh0g: <FSR> Nor had I!
Feb-28-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <hedgeh0g> There's no need to be so modest. I know that you guys <invented> chess. http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Chess http://www.danamackenzie.com/blog/?...
Mar-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I composed this problem in my sleep. Literally. It's not that deep, but under the circumstances that's not too shocking.


click for larger view

White to play and draw (Rhine, 2014).

Mar-03-14  Jim Bartle: I think white should move his knight...

1. Nxh3 f1(q) 2. Ng1+ and the king moves and it's stalemate.

Mar-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Jim Bartle> 1.Nxh3 f1(Q)+ 2.Ng1+ Kf2 3.h4 Qxg1#.
Mar-03-14  Jim Bartle: OK, I was asleep. I'll try while awake.

1. Nf3

Mar-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Jim Bartle> Yup:

1...Kxf3 stalemate;

1...f1(Q)+ 2.Ng1+ K moves stalemate (2...Qxg1+ 3.Kxg1=);

1...f1(R)+ 2.Ng1+ K moves stalemate (2...Rxg1+ 3.Kxg1=);

1...f1(N) 2.Ng5=;

1...f1(B) 2.Ng5 Kf2 3.Nxh3+ Bxh3 stalemate;

1...other K moves 2.Nd2 K moves (2...Kxd2 stalemate) 3.Nf1=.

Mar-03-14  Jim Bartle: I have a question then. Why when I get, or have a chance to get, rook pawn and bishop against a lone king, is the queening square <always> the wrong color? I mean it can't be by pure chance.
Mar-04-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Dunno, Jim. Surely it can't happen that often, can it? Offhand, I can't recall ever having either side of B+RP of the wrong color against lone king.
Mar-04-14  Jim Bartle: Just kidding. Playing against computers I get these big advantages too often, then can't avoid falling into a drawn ending.
Mar-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Jim Bartle> I was curious as to how many games were drawn because of bishop and wrong-colored rook pawn. I only found 32 in the database. Since there are 707,000+ games in the database, that implies a frequency of about one in 22,000 games. Most of the 35 games on this list are such endings: Endgame Explorer: BP vs K. Two of the games on the list were unrelated endgames where the superior side simply blundered into stalemate: Kasparov vs Kiril Georgiev, 1988 and J N'Guyen vs M Rebreyend, 2000. Two of the games were endings where the side with the bishop and wrong-colored rook pawn captured en passant with a pawn in a position like this:


click for larger view

Podolny vs Dus Chotimirsky, 1949 after 68.b4!

That ending is still a draw with the bishop stuck on R7 defending its pawn on N6: Podolny vs Dus Chotimirsky, 1949; V Liberzon vs Z Franco Ocampos, 1976.

Three other games reached that ending, but not from a bishop and wrong-colored rook pawn situation: D Van Riemsdijk vs I Morovic, 1981; S Zhigalko vs M Gagunashvili, 2013; R Barski vs V Jacko, 2011. That leaves 30 of the 35 games on the list that were drawn because of bishop and wrong-colored rook pawn (in two instances transmuted into bishop on R7 defending pawn on N6). In addition to those games, Carlsen vs Aarland, 2002 and Chandler vs Zsuzsa Polgar, 1987 are games where the superior side drew with bishop and <two> wrong-colored rook pawns.

But I think that 32 may be substantially too low, because of this explanation of how Endgame Explorer works:

<How long must the forces be on the board to be considered an ending? - For 6 half-moves (3 moves). This is necessary to prevent miscategorizing endings due to intermezzo moves.>

So if the players reach bishop and wrong-colored rook pawn and immediately agree to a draw (or do so with that ending on the board for only five or fewer half-moves), Endgame Explorer will not pick up that game. I imagine that that is a very common scenario.

See my comments to S Hegarty vs A P De Oliveira, 2010 for an explanation for how the side with the bishop can sometimes win, despite having a bishop and wrong-colored rook pawn if the opponent has two pawns.

Mar-05-14  Jim Bartle: Of course the games in the database are between good players, where a player with the advantage usually can see far ahead and knows how to avoid the drawn ending.

I don't/can't do that, though I'm getting more careful in trying to avoid being left with a lone rook pawn, even if it's unopposed. Computer programs do seem to understand the concept and have given me material at times, as long as it leaves me with the wrong rook pawn.

I looked at Carlsen vs Aarland, 2002 from Carlsen in 2002. Must be really, really frustrating for the other player not to win with two pawns and a bishop against a lone king.

Mar-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I posted my last post before I intended to do so. Below are the two types of endings where it is possible to win with bishop and wrong-colored rook pawn versus two pawns.

In S Hegarty vs A P De Oliveira, 2010, de Oliveira's 54...Kxb4?? was a blunder, throwing away the win.


click for larger view

In such positions, the player with the bishop and wrong-colored rook pawn must leave <both> of the opponent's pawns on the board, stalemate the opponent (except for one pawn move), compelling the opponent to advance his/her knight pawn, allowing the rook pawn to capture it, thereby transmuting itself into a knight pawn and winning. It is essential to leave <both> of the inferior side's pawns on the board so that once the side with the bishop plays RPxNP the inferior side still can advance the other pawn, so there is no stalemate. Black could have won with <54...Kc2! 55.Ka2 Kc1 56.Ka1> [56.Ka3 Kb1 57.Ka4 Bd3 58.Ka3 (58.Ka5 Bb5 59.Kb6 Kb2 60.Kc5 Kxb3) 58...Ka1 59.Ka4 Kb2 60. Ka5 Kxb3] <56...Bb1! 57.b5 axb5 58. b4 Be4.>

Euwe vs J Baay, 1921 was similar except that the inferior side had an a and b pawn rather than two b pawns:


click for larger view

Black resigned in light of 64...Ka6 65.Bb6! b4 66.axb4 a3 67.b5# or 64...Ka8 65.Kb6! b4 66.axb4. I see from Chernev's <Practical Chess Endings>, p. 157, that this ending is identical in all material respects to an 1885 endgame study by Horwitz.

Here is a position from L. Paulsen-Metzger, Nuremberg 1888. This time the inferior side has just one pawn, but with Black's king cut off from the corner White manages to eke out a win:


click for larger view

<1.Kd4!!> 1.Kc5? b6+!=; 1.Kc4? b5+!=; 1.Ke5? b5! 2.a6 b4 3.Kd4 Kc6 4.Kc4 b3 5.Kxb3 Kb5=. <1...Kc6> 1...b5 2.a6! Kc6 3.Kc3 Kd7 4.Kb4 Kc6 5.Ka5 . <2.Bb6! Kd6> 2...Kb5 3.Kd5 Ka6 4.Kd6 . <3.Kc4 Kc6 4.Kb4 Kd6 5.Kb5 Kd7 6.Kc5 Kc8 7.Ba7! Kc7 8.Kb5 Kd7 9.Bb8 Kc8 10.Bh2 Kd7 11.Kb6 .> Fine and Benko, <Basic Chess Endings>, p. 136.

Mar-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Jim Bartle: ... Computer programs do seem to understand the concept and have given me material at times, as long as it leaves me with the wrong rook pawn.>

You must be the Zhao Xue of Peru. See A Zatonskih vs Zhao Xue, 2011; E Danielian vs Zhao Xue, 2012.

Mar-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <----Still shaking head in astonishment.

Just came up with a sick pun for the latter game: Once Was Not Enough.

Mar-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <perfidious: <----Still shaking head in astonishment.

Just came up with a sick pun for the latter game: Once Was Not Enough.>>

I'm sure you recall that Lilienthal and Topalov each had two knights versus pawn twice.

Maybe ZX thought she'd find a way to win the ending the second time around. I'm reminded of Bronstein's story in <100 Open Games> about the time he was playing Najdorf. Najdorf was apparently in a little difficulty in the endgame, but sacked down to an ending of lone king versus Bronstein's king and two knights. Bronstein gave him a scare by claiming that some guy in the USSR had found a way to win that ending. Najdorf looked mortified until Bronstein started laughing.

Mar-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR> Had forgotten that tale from Bronstein.

Here is another involving Najdorf.

He was playing at the annual Wijk aan Zee event long ago, and one of his habits was to ask others how they assessed his position.

On one occasion, Najdorf directed his query to a Dutch journalist who knew little or nothing about chess. This lack of knowledge did not deter the journalist from telling Najdorf that he was 'sunk without a bubble'.

So far as I know, that cured Najdorf's little habit.

Mar-05-14  tbentley: I played a game with a rook pawn and wrong-colored bishop a few months ago.


click for larger view

The above game continued 1.Kxb4 Bxe3 2.Kxc3 Kf5 3.Kd3 Bb6 4.Ke2? (h3 draws) Kg4 5.h4 Kxg3? (h5 wins easily) 6.h5 Bc5:


click for larger view

A draw was agreed here, but is that the correct theoretical result?

Mar-06-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <Bronstein gave him a scare by claiming that some guy in the USSR had found a way to win that ending. Najdorf looked mortified until Bronstein started laughing.>

Funny that first time I heard about this incident it was Keres who were mentioned as the trickster ;) but the point remains the same off course.

Mar-06-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <moronovich> I'm pretty sure I read the story in Bronstein's <200 Open Games>, and probably was thinking as a consequence of that that Bronstein must have been the trickster. It could well have been Bronstein writing about Keres.
Mar-06-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <tbentley: ... A draw was agreed here, but is that the correct theoretical result?>


click for larger view

No. Black wins with correct play. The game might continue <1. Kf1 Bb6 2.Ke2 Bf2 3.Kd3> 3.Kf1? Kf3! 4.h6 Be3 5.Ke1 Kg2 <3...Kf3 4.Kd2 Bg3 5.Kd1 Ke3 6.Kc2 Be1 7.Kd1 Bb4 8.Kc2 Bd2 9.Kb3> 9.Kd1? Kd3 <9...Kd3 10.Kb2 Be3 11.Ka3 Kc3 12.Ka4!> The best try. I analyzed 12.Ka2? Bc5 13.Kb1 Ba3 14.Ka2 Kb4 15.Kb1 Kb3 16.Ka1 Bc1 17.Kb1 Bb2! 18.h6 Ba3 19.Ka1 Kc2 20.Ka2 Bf8 on my own. I now turned to the Nalimov tablebases, http://www.k4it.de/index.php?topic=..., to see how to handle the trickier 12.Ka4! <12...Kc4 13.Ka3 Bc1+ 14.Ka4> 14.Ka2? Kc3 15.Kb1 Ba3 16.Ka2 Kb4 17.Kb1 Kb3 18.Ka1 Bc1 19.Kb1 Bb2 . <14...Bb2 15.Ka5 Bc3+ 16.Kb6> (16.Ka4 Bb4! ) <16...Bb4 17.Kc6 Bc5>


click for larger view

<18.Kb7!> Paradoxically, this is White's best chance. He dreams of Ka6-b5-c4-d3-e2-f1-g2=. Weaker is 18.Kd7 Kd5 19.Kd8 Ke6 20.Kc7 Kf6 21.Kc6 Kg5! 22.Kd5 Kxh5 23.Ke4 Kg4 0-1. <18... h6> The fastest win according to Nalimov. One can delay this move, and should if one doesn't know for certain that it wins here. <19.Kc6 Ba3 20.Kb6! Bb4 21.Kc6 Bc5 22.Kb7 Kb5 23.Kc7 Ba3 24.Kd7 Kc5 25.Ke6 Kd4!> Only move! <26.Kf5 Bd6!> Only move! <27.Kg6 Bf4 28.Kf5 Ke3 29.Kg4 Bd6 30.Kh4 Kf3 31.Kh3 Kf2 32.Kg4 Kg2 33.Kf5 Kf3! 34.Kg6 Bf4 35.Kf5 Be3 36.Ke5 Kg4 37.Ke4 Ba7 38.Kd3 Kxh5 39.Ke2 Kg4 40.Kf1 Kf3 41.Ke1 h5> 0-1.

Mar-08-14  Shams: Beefeater variation from R1 of the Reykjavik Open:
D Fridgeirsson vs P Constantinou, 2014
Mar-08-14  Howard: Regarding FSR's comment on Lilienthal, he had that strange ending (two knights vs. pawn) three times in his career, not twice. Chess Life mentioned that once back in 1981, plus the now-defunct Inside Chess said the same thing back around 1990.

Though I don't know specifically whom those three games were against except that.....Lilienthal had the stronger side in all three cases, but all three games were drawn !

Mar-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Howard> Thanks. I know of the claim that Lilienthal had the ending thrice, not twice. As I commented on L N Enequist vs M Fish, 1934 on September 3, 2011:

<Two knights versus pawn is an ending that has vexed grandmasters. Super-GM Andre Lilienthal supposedly had the superior side of the ending thrice, but could only draw each time.>

The source of this claim AFAIK is Botvinnik, who wrote on page 155 of <Championship Chess> (his account of the 1941 USSR "Absolute Championship"), in annotating Smyslov vs Lilienthal, 1941:

<In general, this end-game is a rare occurrence in practical play. However, if my memory does not betray me, Lilienthal had encountered this very end-game (irony of fate!) twice previously, and on neither occasion could he discover the way to victory.>

But if there really was a third Lilienthal game with this ending (in addition to the Smyslov game and G Norman vs Lilienthal, 1934), it doesn't seem to be in the databases. For that reason, I operate on the assumption that Botvinnik's memory <had> betrayed him and that Lilienthal "only" had the ending twice.

Mar-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> Thanks. Typical - Black is much higher rated, White allows the Beefeater, has no idea what he's doing, and gets rolled like a joint.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 155)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 53 OF 155 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC