chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
 
plerranov
Chess Game Collections
[what is this?] --*-- [what is this?]

<< previous | page 9 of 9 | next >>
  1. WCC Index [Korchnoi-Mecking 1974]
    13 games, 1974

  2. WCC Index [Polugaevsky-Mecking 1977]
    12 games, 1977

  3. WCC Index [Zurich 1953]
    These are the games in order according to David Bronstein's excellent book, "Zurich International Chess Tournament 1953." He participated in the tournament with the strongest in the world at that time as a Candidates match to determine the challenger for then world champion Mikhail Botvinnik. The complete list of participants in addition to Bronstein include: Smyslov, Keres, Reshevsky, Petrosian, Geller, Najdorf, Kotov, Taimanov, Averbakh, Boleslavsky, Szabo, Gligoric, Euwe, and Ståhlberg. A treasury of games, as Bronstein (and two of his fellow players who also compiled books) well knew, which are as interesting to read about as to play through. While specific games may have excerpts from Bronstein's book quoted, this list is meant as recommendation to purchase and read through this book yourself, and to give easy reference for people playing through the games.
    210 games, 1953

  4. WCC: FIDE WCC Tournament 1948
    ORIGINAL: FIDE World Championship Tournament (1948)

    Edward Winter, "Interregnum" (2003-2004) http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

    <World Championship Disorder> Edward Winter (2002) http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

    <The World Chess Championship by Paul Keres> Edward Winter http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

    Reshevsky vs Botvinnik, 1946

    ##########################################

    <2 March - 17 May> In The Hague and Moscow

    <DRAFT EDIT> <JFQ>

    World chess champion Alexander Alekhine died on 23 March 1946. At the July 1946 Winterthur congress, FIDE proposed a contest for the vacant title be scheduled for June 1947 in the Netherlands.<1> They planned a quadruple round robin tournament featuring the following candidates- Samuel Reshevsky, Reuben Fine, Mikhail Botvinnik, Paul Keres, Vasily Smyslov, and the winner of either the upcoming Groningen or Prague tournaments, decided by a match if necessary.<2> Max Euwe was also included because he had previously held the world title.<3> The tournament was delayed, partly because the USSR was not yet a FIDE member.<4> On 15 September 1946, the proposed contestants (except Fine) met in Moscow to iron out the details. This meeting occurred a day after the USSR-USA match ended, and did not involve FIDE.<5> Botvinnik reportedly announced that he would not play in the Netherlands. He was angry about a Dutch news report that suggested his fellow Russians might collude to help him win the title.<4> The five contestants then compromised with a plan to divide the event between the Netherlands and Moscow. The Soviet Sports Committee refused this idea outright because they wanted all the games to be played in Moscow.<6> Meanwhile, FIDE president Alexander Rueb withdrew FIDE's claim to organize the tournament.<4>

    Nothing concrete was decided until the next FIDE congress in The Hague on 30 July-2 August 1947. The Soviets were now members of FIDE.<7> All parties agreed to most of the terms originally proposed at Winterthur 1946. The new conditions stated that the tournament would begin in spring 1948, be played partly in The Hague and partly in Moscow, and most notably, no extra player would be added.<8,9> Miguel Najdorf was excluded because of this change. He won Prague 1946 and would have qualified directly for the championship tournament, since Botvinnik won Groningen 1946 and was already seeded into the championship.<9> Shortly before the tournament, Fine dropped out due to academic commitments. FIDE therefore decided to stage a quintuple round robin, for a total of 25 rounds, with one player having a bye each round.<10,11>

    The time control was 40 moves in 2 1/2 hours and 16 moves per hour after that.<12,13> Players were permitted two assistants to help analyze adjourned games.<14> First prize was $5,000; second $3,000; third $2,000; fourth $1,500; and fifth $1,000.<13> Milan Vidmar was arbiter, assisted by Alexander Kotov.<12,15> Decided by lot, the first 10 rounds were held in The Hague, followed by 15 rounds in Moscow.<16> During the first leg, all players except Botvinnik lodged at the Kurhaus in Scheveningen.<17> Botvinnik objected to the Kurhaus, explaining that he wanted to stay "in a hotel where I can get to... (the Dierentuin playing hall) on foot in twenty minutes."<18> At first, a few members of the Russian delegation insisted that Botvinnik stay with the other players at the Kurhaus. But Soviet consul Filipp Chikirisov offered to locate different lodgings, and Botvinnik was eventually able to secure rooms at the Hotel De Twee Steden for his family and his seconds, Viacheslav Ragozin and Salomon Flohr.<18>

    Botvinnik led the field by a point when he faced Keres in the 10th round. Due to a scheduling vagary, Keres was playing after an unusually long layoff. Before the tournament, Botvinnik had noticed this odd scheduling possibility and warned his countrymen that "when we get to The Hague, one of you will get six days of rest, and lose like a child on the seventh day." "After six days' rest", Botvinnik later recalled, "Keres sat across from me, pale as death."<19> Keres proceeded to <lose in 23 moves> <insert game link>- Botvinnik vs Keres, 1948, enabling Botvinnik to carry a 1.5 point lead into the Moscow leg. In Moscow, the masters played in the magnificent Salle des Colonnes in front of 2,000 spectators. 3,000 more people were in the streets outside, following the action on a giant demonstration board.<20> Botvinnik clinched the title by round 22, finishing three points ahead of Smyslov.

    Some charge that the Soviets pressured Keres to throw games to help Botvinnik win.<21> According to Kenneth Whyld, Keres told him that "he was not ordered to lose... games to Botvinnik, and was not playing to lose. But he had been given a broader instruction that if Botvinnik failed to become World Champion, it must not be the fault of Keres."<22> In 1991 Botvinnik claimed that "during the second half in Moscow... it was proposed that the other Soviet players... lose to me on purpose... it was Stalin... who proposed this. But of course I refused!"<23> In a 1994 conversation with Gennadi Sosonko, Botvinnik said "...in 1948 I played well. I prepared with all my heart and showed what I was capable of."<24>

    ==================

    NOTES

    <1> FIDE (Fédération internationale des échecs or World Chess Federation), founded in 1924, first administered a world chess championship in 1948. In Edward Winter, "Interregnum" (2003-2004) http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

    http://www.fide.com/

    <2> Erwin Voellmy, "Schweizerische Schachzeitung" (Nov 1946), pp.169-171. In Winter, "Interregnum."

    <3> Minutes of the FIDE Secretariat of the congress in Winterthur in July 1946. In Winter, "Interregnum."

    <4> "CHESS" (Dec 1946), p.63. In Winter, "Interregnum."

    <5> Mikhail Botvinnik, "Achieving the Aim" Bernard Cafferty, transl. (Pergamon 1981), pp.105-106

    <6> Botvinnik, "Achieving the Aim" pp.107-108

    <7> The USSR joined FIDE at The Hague conference of 1947. They arrived late on 2 Aug, the last day of the congress. "El Ajedrez Argentino" (Nov-Dec 1947), pp. 298-300. In Winter, "Chess: The History of FIDE" "Section 5: Euwe world champion for one day" http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

    <8> Erwin Voellmy, "Schweizerische Schachzeitung" (Oct 1947), pp.154-155. In Winter, "Interregnum."

    <9> "Chess Review" (Aug 1947), p.2

    <10> "American Chess Bulletin" (Jan-Feb 1948), p.11. In Winter, "Interregnum."

    <11> "American Chess Bulletin" (Mar-Apr 1948), p.25. In Winter, "Interregnum."

    <12> Paul Keres, "Match Tournament for the World Chess Championship- The Hague and Moscow 1948" (Estonian State Publishing 1950), p.7

    <13> Harry Golombek, "The World Chess Championship 1948" (Hardinge Simpole 1949), p.3

    <14> Botvinnik, "Achieving the Aim" p.111

    <15> Golombek, p.4

    <16> G.W.J. Zittersteyn, "The Preparations for the Netherlands Leg" in Max Euwe, "The Hague-Moscow 1948 Match/Tournament for the World Chess Championship" (Russell Enterprises 2013), p.19

    <17> D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, "Battle Royal... A Round by Round Account of the Thrilling Contest for the World's Chess Title." In "Chess Life and Review" (Apr 1948), p.7

    <18> Botvinnik, "Achieving the Aim" pp.113-114. We have corrected the spelling of the hotel in the source text, which was "Twee Staden." According to a contemporary Dutch newspaper account, the correct spelling is "De Twee Steden." "De Tijd", 25 March 1948, p.2. http://kranten.delpher.nl/nl/view/i...

    <19> Mikhail Botvinnik, "15 Games and their Stories" Jim Marfia, transl. (Chess Enterprise Inc. 1982), pp.40-42

    <20> Golombek, p.126

    <21> Taylor Kingston, "The Keres-Botvinnik case revisited: A further survey of the evidence" ("Chess Cafe" 8 Oct 2001), p.2. http://www.chesscafe.com/text/skitt...

    <22> Tim Krabbé, "Open Chess Diary", Item #65 (11 June 2000) http://timkr.home.xs4all.nl/chess2/....

    <23> Max Pam and Genna Sosonko, "Een interview met Michail Moiseevitch Botwinnik" (Vrij Nederland 20 Aug 1991) http://www.maxpam.nl/archief/IBOTWI.... In Tim Krabbé, "Open Chess Diary" Item #42 http://timkr.home.xs4all.nl/chess2/.... In Kingston, pp.4-5

    <24> Genna Sosonko, "Russian Silhouttes 3d Edition" (New in Chess, 2009), p.42

    ########################################

    <EDIT> Karpova

    http://www.maxpam.nl/archief/IBOTWI...

    Question: - Fischer heeft altijd beweerd dat de Sovjet-spelers in combine tegen hem speelden. Is er indertijd wel eens sprake geweest van zo'n combine?

    Botvinnik: <"In het geval van Fischer kan ik daar geen oordeel over geven, maat ik heb zelf wel eens meegemaakt dat er opdrachten werden verstrekt. In 1948 speelde ik met Keres, Smislov, Reshevsky en Euwe om de wereldtitel. Na de eerste helft van het toernooi, dat in Nederland werd gespeeld, werd het duidelijk dat ik de nieuwe wereldkampioen zou worden. Ik stond op kop. Tijdens de tweede helft in Moskou gebeurde er iets onaangenaams. Op heel hoog niveau werd voorgesteld dat de andere Russische spelers expres tegen mij zouden verliezen, om er zeker van te zijn dat er een Sovjet-wereldkampioen zou komen.>

    Question: - Hoe hoog?

    Botvinnik: <"Stalin heeft dat persoonlijk voorgesteld. Maar ik heb dat natuurlijk geweigerd! Het was een intrige tegenover mij om mij te kleineren. Een belachelijk voorstel, slechts gedaan om mij als de toekomstige wereldkampioen nog even te kleineren. In sommige kringen wilde men liever dat Keres wereldkampioen zou worden. Het was oneerbaar, want ik had al lang bewezen dat ik op dat moment sterker was dan Keres en Smislov.>

    ===

    Translation from Dutch to English by <dakgootje>:

    Question: - Fischer has always asserted that the Sovjet players played together against him. Has such a team-play* taken place at the time?

    Botvinnik: <"I can't judge regarding the case of Fischer, but I've personally experienced that orders were handed out. In 1948 I played with Keres, Smyslov, Reshevsky and Euwe for the World Title. After the first half of the tournament, which was played in the Netherlands, it became clear that I would become the new World Champion. I had the lead. During the second half in Moscow something unpleasant happened. From very high up it was proposed that the other Russian competitors would lose to me on purpose, so as it be sure that there'd be a Sovjet-World Champion.>

    Question: - How high up?

    Botvinnik: <"Stalin has proposed it personally. But of course I've refused! It was an intrigue against me to belittle me. A preposterous proposal, merely done to diminish me as future World Champion. In some circles it was preferred that Keres would become World Champion. I was dishonorable, because I'd long proven to be stronger at the time than Keres and Smyslov.>

    --

    ############################################

    http://www.365chess.com/tournaments...

    Botvinnik vs Reshevsky, 1946

    <CONDITIONS>

    <10 rounds in The Hague, followed by 15 rounds in Moscow. The order of the venues (Moscow 2d) was decided by lot (drawing of a pawn).40 moves in 2 1/2 hours, 16 moves per hour after that, time of play 5:30pm - 10:30pm. Players may agree on a draw at any time. Each player permitted to analyze adjourned games with 2 assistants. <<<Prizes:>>> 1st $5,000; 2d $3,000; 3d $2000; 4th $1,500; 5th $1,000.

    <Arbiter:> Milan Vidmar

    <Assistant to Vidmar:> Alexander Kotov

    <The Hague venue:> The "Kierentuin," which before the war was headquarters of the local zoo.

    <Residence for players and officials (and some adjourned games finished here):> The "Kurhaus" in Scheveningen>

    <Botvinnik refused to stay in the "Kurhaus" and was given rooms in the "Hotel Twee Staden." He was joined at the Hotel by his wife, daughter, and his 2d Ragozin.>

    <Official Opening:> <Held <<<in>>> "The Town Hall.">

    <Moscow venue:> <"Salle des Collones" (Hall <<<of>>> Columns)>

    ###########################

    <NEGOTIATIONS for Alekhine-Botvinnik title match>:

    ===

    Nov 1938

    <Botvinnik's> recollection:

    <"At the end of the tournament <<<[AVRO 1938]>>> I approached Alekhine and asked him to grant me an audience. He caught on quickly, a look of joy flashed over his face. He realised that playing a match for the world championship with a Soviet player was the simplest, and possibly the only, way to reconcile himself with his native land...

    I invited Flohr to come with me (I needed an authoritative witness-- wasn't Alekhine connected with White Russian emigres? Care was essential.) But Alekhine had been well disposed towards me since the Nottingham tournament. The chess player in him felt my admiration for him, and this disarmed him....

    Over a cup of tea... the conditions were quickly agreed... Alekhine was ready to play in any country (except Holland!) and the question of venue was up to me. The prize fund was to be 10,000 dollars...

    We agreed that I should send a formal challenge to an address he gave in South America... If there was a positive decision and that if everything was agreed the announcement of the match would be made in Moscow. Before then everything was to be strictly secret.

    We had a firm handshake and then parted, never to see each other again.">

    -Mikhail Botvinnik "Achieving the Aim"
    Bernard Cafferty, transl.
    (Pergamon 1981), pp. 70-71

    ===

    Jan-Feb 1946

    <Botvinnik on title match negotiations with Alekhine>:

    <"The situation was a delicate one. First of all it was out of the question to invite Alekhine to Moscow, as this was linked with the preliminary investigation of <<<the accusations,>>> and secondly it was undesirable to enter into direct negotiations with him. I suggested that the whole match be played in England and at first the negotiations went through an intermediary, Mr Du Mont, editor of the "British Chess Magazine" (from material published in the magazine one could take it that du Mont and Alekhine were corresponding with each other)... the suggestion was accepted and negotiations began.">

    <First of all it was out of the question to invite Alekhine to Moscow, as <<<this>>> was linked with the preliminary investigation of the accusations, and secondly it was undesirable to enter into direct negotiations with him.>

    The word "this" refers to the plan to play Alekhine for the title match. Botvinnik means the match would be too directly linked to the accusations (of Alekhine's collaboration) if the match were to take place in Moscow.

    In the sentence

    <the suggestion was <<<accepted>>> and negotiations began>,

    Botvinnik means it was <accepted> by the Soviet government. Despite this, a faction in the Soviet government still tried to prevent the match, and Botvinnik had to spend most of his time arranging political allies to help convince his government to allow the match. Some in the Soviet government feared that they would be accused of dealing with a Nazi collaborator. In particular, they were worried about losing credibility with the French communists, who were among the most vocal detractors of Alekhine.

    Now, March 1946

    Botvinnik: <"A letter arrived from England, from Derbyshire (the organiser of the Nottingham tournament). Now he was president of the <<<British Chess Federation.>>> He told us that in principle the English were prepared to run the match (which was quite understandable as the prize fund was guaranteed by the Soviet Union)...">

    It was a telegram from the same Derbyshire that (according to Francisco Lupi) Alekhine received a short time before he died. The dating is actually ambiguous in Lupi's account. It's Botvinnik who claims Alekhine received the telegram a day before he died, but I can find no corroboration for this at present.

    Botvinnik: <"The day before (Alekhine's death)... there was a meeting of the executive committee of the British Chess Federation where the question of the match was resolved favourably. Immediately after the meeting Alekhine was sent a telegram with an official <<<proposal>>> to play a world title match with the USSR champion (meaning Botvinnik)." >

    -Mikhail Botvinnik
    "Achieving the Aim."
    Bernard Cafferty, transl.
    (Pergamon 1981), pp.95-98

    ===

    <Yuri Shaburov on Botvinnik-Alekhine match negotiations>:

    <"...suddenly, on March 8, news came that changed the situation. Alekhine was handed a telegram from British chess official Derbyshire, notifying him of messages from Botvinnik wishing to play him for the world championship... Alekhine responded by sending a telegram the same day, with his consent to the conditions proposed for the match. Soon after, Alekhine was invited to the British Embassy in Lisbon, ​​where he was handed a <<<letter from Botvinnik.>>> It said: 'I regret that the war prevented our match in 1939. I again challenge you to a match for the world championship. If you agree, I await your answer, with your preferences for the time and venue for the match.'

    February 4, 1946. Mikhail Botvinnik. ">

    <Negotiations on the match were now concrete. Alekhine chose Du Mont, editor of the British Chess Magazine, as his representative to finalize the conditions of time and place of the match. Already, it was agreed that the <<<match will be held in London,>>> waiting for the decision of the Executive Committee of FIDE.>

    Yuri Shaburov, "Alexander Alekhine- The Undefeated Champion" (The Voice 1992), pp. 230-231.

    http://lib.rus.ec/b/377831/read

    ===

    <Skinner and Verhoeven on Botvinnik-Alekhine match negotiations>:

    <"Just fifteen days before his death, Alekhine, by now financially destitute, was working with Lupi on a book of the Hastings tournament to try to obtain some income when... a telegram arrived from the President of the British Chess Federation [Derbyshire] saying that Botvinnik had financial backing to issue a challenge for the world championship and had proposed the match be played in England. <<<Alekhine answered straight-away and accepted the challenge...>>> Some days later Botvinnik's intentions were confirmed in a personal letter which was delivered through the British Embassy. Alekhine then asked his old friend, Julius du Mont, the editor of the British Chess Magazine, to act as his representative in England... On the night of the 23 March he suffered a fatal heart attack...">

    --Skinner and Verhoeven
    "Alexander Alekhine's Chess Games 1902-1946"
    McFarland, 1998
    p. 733

    ===

    <Pablo Moran on Botvinnik-Alekhine match negotiations>:

    <"...telegram from Mr. Derbyshire in Nottingham:

    'Moscow offer substantial sum for chess championship of world to be played in England between you and Botvinnik suggest you appoint someone in England represent you and arrange all details wire reply.'

    "This was the cause of Alekhine's second cardiac stroke... He answered Mr. Derbyshire immediately, accepting the match provided Botvinnik wold agree to the conditions of 1939... Some days later... Botvinnik himself sent a letter through the British Emabassy in Lisbon.

    The text was in Russian, with an English version attached:

    'World's Championship. Mr. A. Alekhine!

    I regret that the war prevented the organisation of our match in 1939. But I herewith again challenge you to a match for the world's chess championship. If you agree, a person authorized by myself and the Moscow Chess Club will conduct negotiations with you or your representative on the question of conditions, date and the place where the match should be held, <<<preferably through the British Chess Federation.>>> I await your answer, in which I also ask you to state your ideas about the date and the place of the match. I beg you to send a telegraphic reply, with subsequent postal confirmation, to the Moscow Chess Club.'

    February 4th, 1946.
    '(Sgd.)Michael Botvinnik'">

    -Pablo Moran
    "A. Alekhine- Agony of a Chess Genius"
    Edited and translated by Frank X. Mur
    McFarland, 1989
    p. 276

    #####################################################

    25-27 July 1946

    <FIDE Congress in Winterthur>

    <As regards the world championship, it was decided in Winterthur <<<25-27 July 1946>>> to fill the vacancy by organizing, exceptionally, a tournament among the top candidates, i.e. Euwe, Botvinnik, Keres, Smyslov, Fine, Reshevsky and one of the winners of the upcoming Groningen and Prague tournaments. To settle the qualification issue regarding the future candidates a commission was appointed, comprising Rueb (Chairman), Louma (Vice-Chairman), Sir George Thomas, O. Bernstein and E. Voellmy.

    ...it was decided that the world championship tournament (four rounds) would take place in the Netherlands in June 1947, offers having also been received from the United States and Argentina. As previously noted, Euwe was chosen as a participant (by dint of having held the world title), and the federations of the United States and the USSR were given until 1 September 1946 to nominate other masters from their respective countries if they were not satisfied with FIDE’s selection of Reshevsky, Fine, Botvinnik, Keres and Smyslov. The minutes also stated:

    ‘If the winners of the tournaments in Groningen and Prague are not among the six above-mentioned masters, they shall play a match in Prague organized by the Czechoslovak Federation under the auspices of <<<FIDE.>>> The winner of that match shall be added to the list of participants. If one of the winners of those two tournaments is already on the list of participants, the other shall automatically qualify. Should the envisaged match end in a draw, the Qualification Committee shall decide upon the procedure.’>

    -Edward Winter, "Interregnum" (2003-2004) http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

    ===

    19 Sept 1946

    <Botvinnik:>

    <"In September of last year, when the strongest chessplayers of the world were gathered here in Moscow <<<(Keres, Reshevsky, Smyslov, Euwe, Fine and the author of this article)>>> they held a conference (19 September) on the subject of the coming contest for the world championship. After the inevitable arguments, it seemed that a means of agreement was indicated.">

    -"CHESS" March 1947, pp. 168-169. In Edward Winter, "Interregnum."

    ===

    Dec 1946

    "Chess" magazine:

    <‘Holland having got together £4,000 for the world championship tournament planned by the FIDE next June, Euwe arranged a meeting of the six prospective participants (himself, Fine and Reshevsky of the USA and Botvinnik, Keres and Smyslov of the USSR) at Moscow. At this, Botvinnik in anger stated that one Dutch paper during the Groningen tournament [won by Botvinnik, ahead of Euwe and Smyslov] had said that the Russian participants might work together to put him into first place. He therefore refused to play for the championship in Holland. Russians know no ‘freedom of the press’. It was finally agreed to stage the event half in Holland, half in Russia, but there was further argument over the question of where the first half should be held.

    The USSR has not joined the International Chess Federation (FIDE). At the last FIDE Assembly Spain, who had been a founder-member and had paid its dues throughout, was ejected in the hope that the Soviets would join; the sacrifice has deeply wounded Spanish sentiment.

    The Russians want the tournament in April, Fine not before August. Estimates of the cost of Holland’s half of the tournament are now rising to £6,000 and £7,000.

    Dr Rueb, President of the FIDE, has <<<withdrawn FIDE’s claim>>> to organize the tournament, which work lies mainly between Euwe (for the Dutch Federation) and the Russian Chess Federation at the moment.’>

    -"CHESS" December 1946, p.63. In Edward Winter, "Interregnum."

    ===

    Jan 1947

    <Najdorf:>

    <CHESS printed a report on an interview in the January 1947 issue of El Ajedrez Español in which Najdorf had declared:

    <<<I believe that I am inferior to none of the players who are to participate in the next world championship, Botvinnik, Fine, Reshevsky, Keres, Euwe. …None of these have a better record than I. I have played much less than they have, admittedly, but I am satisfied with my results>>>.’>

    -In Edward Winter, "Interregnum."

    ===

    Before Aug 1947

    <As the players and national federations continued to jockey for position, <<<FIDE>>> prepared for what was expected to be its decisive congress, in The Netherlands in the summer of 1947>

    -Edward Winter, "Interregnum."

    ===

    30 July - 2 August 1947

    <FIDE Congress in The Hague>

    <...the Swiss delegate, E. Voellmy, gave an account in the October 1947 Schweizerische Schachzeitung (pages 154-155). He reported that the idea of an Euwe-Reshevsky match had been evoked and that a widespread wish existed in Eastern Europe for a Botvinnik-Keres match. Nonetheless, Voellmy recorded, <<<the Russians had reverted to the Winterthur plan,>>> and the agreement meant that March 1948 would see the start of a six-man tournament (Botvinnik, Keres, Smyslov, Euwe, Reshevsky and Fine), firstly in the Netherlands and then, following a two-week break, in Moscow.">

    -Edward Winter, "Interregnum."

    ===

    1-2 Aug 1947

    <Euwe champion for one day>

    According to Oxford Companion:
    <"Thus he (Euwe) would say wryly that he had been world champion for one day in 1947.”

    However, according to the minutes of the FIDE Congress, that decision was never taken.

    1 and 2 August 1947 respectively, as published in El Ajedrez Argentino, November-December, 1947, pages 298-300):

    after Euwe left the room the delegates decided to proclaim him world champion, but with an obligation upon him to play a match against Reshevsky and with the winner of that match then having to play Botvinnik. However, Messrs Louma and Rogard regarded this proposal as dangerous in view of the absence of the members of the Soviet delegation, and <<<it was decided to postpone the resolution,>>> pending their arrival. The second text above states that after they had come the following day the six-man match-tournament was agreed upon.>

    -Edward Winter, Chessnote 3816

    ===

    "American Chess Bulletin" Report on

    <FIDE Congress in The Hague>

    <It was noted that <<<the Dutch and Soviet Federations had agreed jointly to assume all the expenses, including travel and living costs, of the six masters,>>> and the Bulletin added:

    ‘There were other propositions submitted to the meeting. One suggested a match between Dr Euwe, champion in 1935, and Reshevsky; the other, an enlargement of the plan and the admission of three or four additional masters regarded as eligible to compete for the honor. Both were voted down.

    Because of the grounding of their plane at Berlin en route to The Hague, the four Soviet delegates, Ragozin, Postnikov, Yudovich and Malshev, did not arrive until the last day of the meeting, but, according to Vice-President Giers, cooperated in every way to make possible a harmonious understanding.

    Of far-reaching effect is the entry of the USSR, hitherto outside of the Federation, into closer and permanent relationship with the other leading chess-playing nations as an affiliated unit. It is understood that Russia has 600,000 registered players.

    The world organization, of which Dr A. Rueb of The Hague is the head, is now practically complete and its rulings will carry full weight. All major decisions are left to the General Assembly, which convenes annually and is attended by one delegate from each unit.’>

    -"American Chess Bulletin" September-October 1947, p.107. In Edward Winter, "Interregnum."

    ===

    August 1947

    "Chess Review" commentary:

    <‘The FIDE has virtually revived its program of a year ago ... The line-up is exactly that given then, except for the provision including winners of the 1946 Groningen and Prague tournaments if not those already named. Botvinnik, already named, won at the former; but Mendel <<<Najdorf won at Prague, would have qualified under the 1946 provisions.>>> The only other alterations in the 1946 plans are the added delay to 1948 and the arrangement for half the play to take place in Russia.’>

    -"Chess Review" August 1947, p.2 In Edward Winter, "Interregnum."

    ===

    Jan-Feb 1948

    American Chess Bulletin:

    <Rueben Fine>

    <‘Bad news comes from the West in the announcement that <<<Reuben Fine of Los Angeles has decided to withdraw from the tournament.>>> The reason advanced for this unexpected step on the part of one of the heroes of the AVRO tournament was the necessity for his continuing a post-graduate course at the University of Southern California to avoid the loss of an entire year in the pursuit of his studies.’>

    "American Chess Bulletin" January-February 1948, p.11. In Edward Winter, "Interregnum."

    #########################

    <CONDITIONS>

    <10 rounds in The Hague, followed by 15 rounds in Moscow. The order of the venues (Moscow 2d) was decided by lot (drawing of a pawn).40 moves in 2 1/2 hours, 16 moves per hour after that, time of play 5:30pm - 10:30pm. Players may agree on a draw at any time. Each player permitted to analyze adjourned games with 2 assistants. <<<Prizes:>>> 1st $5,000; 2d $3,000; 3d $2000; 4th $1,500; 5th $1,000.

    <Arbiter:> Milan Vidmar

    <Assistant to Vidmar:> Alexander Kotov

    <The Hague venue:> The "Kierentuin," which before the war was headquarters of the local zoo.

    <Residence for players and officials (and some adjourned games finished here):> The "Kurhaus" in Scheveningen>

    <Botvinnik refused to stay in the "Kurhaus" and was given rooms in the "Hotel Twee Staden." He was joined at the Hotel by his wife, daughter, and his 2d Ragozin.>

    <Official Opening:> <Held <<<in>>> "The Town Hall.">

    <Moscow venue:> <"Salle des Collones" (Hall <<<of>>> Columns)>

    -Harry Golombek, "The World Chess Championship 1948" (Harding Simpole 1949), p.3

    ===

    <Source> for Milan Vidmar arbiter, The Hague venue, residence, official opening venue:

    -D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, "Battle Royal... A Round by Round Account of the Thrilling Contest for the World's Chess Title." "Chess Life and Review" (April 1948), p.6

    <Source> for Draw may be agreed at any time:

    -"Chess Life and Review" "Battle Royal" May 1948, p.11

    ===

    <Source> for Moscow venue:

    Golombek, p.126

    ===

    <Source> for Alexander Kotov assistant to Vidmar, 16 moves per hour after initial time control:

    Paul Keres
    "Match Tournament for the World Chess Championship- The Hague and Moscow 1948"
    (Estonian State Publishing 1950), p.7

    -==============

    <Source> for Moscow being the 2d venue by lot (drawing of pawn)

    --Mikhail Botvinnik
    "Achieving the Aim."
    Bernard Cafferty, transl.
    (Pergamon 1981), p.109

    <Source> for Each player permitted to analyze adjourned games with 2 assistants.

    -Botvinnik, p.111

    <Source> for Botvinnik refused to stay in the "Kurhaus" and was given rooms in the "Hotel Twee Staden"

    -Botvinnik, p.113-114

    <Source> for Botvinnik's wife, daughter, and 2d Ragozin joining him at the Hotel.

    -"Chess Life and Review" "Battle Royal" May 1948, p.8

    #########################

    <Seconds> (Since conditions allowed for <2> people to assist players in analyzing adjourned games, it's possible that some players had more than 1 <second>) See -Botvinnik, p.111

    <Keres> - Bondarevsky (source - Botvinnik, p.118-119)

    and/or Tolush (source- Israel Horowitz, "The World Chess Championship- a History" (MacMillan 1973), p.121)

    ==================

    <Euwe> - Cortlever -(Needs source)

    and/or Van Scheltinga (source- Horowitz, p.121)

    ==================

    <Smyslov> - Alatortsev (source- Horowitz, p.121)

    =================

    <Botvinnik> - Ragozin and Flohr (source- Botvinnik, p.113-114)

    =================

    <Reshevsky> - Prins (source- Horowitz, p.121)

    ###########################

    <COURSE of the TOURNAMENT>

    <Leg One: The Hague>

    #################################

    <Round 1>

    Euwe vs Keres, 1948 <0-1>

    Smyslov vs Reshevsky, 1948 <1/2>

    #################################

    <Round 2>

    Keres vs Smyslov, 1948 <1-0>

    Botvinnik vs Euwe, 1948 <1-0>

    Euwe's 1st career loss to Botvinnik.

    <"Euwe remarked that in his opinion Botvinnik was <<<better than Alekhine>>> was in the 1937 world championship match.">

    -D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, "Battle Royal... A Round by Round Account of the Thrilling Contest for the World's Chess Title." "Chess Life and Review" (April 1948), p.9

    #################################

    <Round 3>

    Reshevsky vs Keres, 1948 <1-0>

    <"The last seven moves were made with three minutes remaining on each of their clocks. Here <<<Sammy>>> showed that superiority in time trouble for which he is famous.">

    -D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, p.11

    ==================

    Smyslov vs Botvinnik, 1948 <1/2>

    <"Among the <<<Russians>>> present at their own reserved table were Ragosin, Tolush, Bondarevsky, Flohr, Kotov, Alatortsev, Lilienthal...">

    -D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde,p.11

    #################################

    <Round 4>

    Euwe vs Smyslov, 1948 <0-1>

    <"With his Queen en prise, Euwe sacrificed both Knights. The atmosphere was charged with excitement. One teller was so unnerved that he dropped some pieces off a wallboard. Everyone was keyed up as <<<the sacrifices looked so good>>> and yet so impenetrably vague. Then Euwe missed the correct line and Smyslov wriggled out of the mating net. Euwe adjourned in a lost position. The pathos exhibited by the faces of the audience was so visible that even Euwe's face turned red all over. But it was too late.>

    -D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, p.14

    "Euwe's description of his thoughts and oversights:" http://kranten.kb.nl/view/article/i...

    ===

    Botvinnik vs Reshevsky, 1948 <1-0>

    <"As expected, both players ran short of time and after twenty-seven moves, their respective times were 2:17 [Botvinnik] and 2:26 [Reshevsky]. On this occasion <<<The U.S. speed whiz>>> faltered, blundered badly and then-- incredibly-- lost the game on time!">

    -D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, pp.13-14

    <"Botvinnik take some sort of <<<pills>>> during the game. Can they be vitamins?">

    D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, p.16

    #################################

    <Round 5>

    Keres vs Botvinnik, 1948 <0-1>

    ===

    Reshevsky vs Euwe, 1948 <1-0>

    <"...Reshevsky made a startling twelfth move <<<[12.d5]>>> which apparently wrecks Black's hopes in this variation... the complications were numerous and in them Euwe lost a pawn. Reshevsky's fortieth move, made with only seconds left on his clock, turned the adjourned ending into a win.">

    -D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, p.15

    #################################

    <Round 6>

    Keres vs Euwe, 1948 <1/2>

    ===

    Reshevsky vs Smyslov, 1948 <1/2>

    #################################

    <Round 7>

    Smyslov vs Keres, 1948 <0-1>

    <"Against Smyslov, Keres adopted tactics similar to those in... K Junge vs Alekhine, 1942 at Munich 1942. The central battle was whether Smyslov could force P-K4. When Keres effectively prevented the thrust, his rival became desperate and <<<sacrificed>>> a pawn unsoundly.">

    Smyslov to play:


    click for larger view

    27.b5?


    click for larger view

    D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, "Battle Royal... A Round by Round Account of the Thrilling Contest for the World's Chess Title." "Chess Life and Review" (May 1948), p.8

    Harry Golombek on <27.b5?>:

    <"In a quite even position, [Smyslov] suddenly procured for himself a chance of losing by a completely <<<unsound Pawn sacrifice,>>> the point of which seemed based on a hallucination.">

    Harry Golombek, "The World Chess Championship 1948" (Harding Simpole 1949), p.91

    ===

    Euwe vs Botvinnik, 1948 <1/2>

    #################################

    <Round 8>

    Botvinnik vs Smyslov, 1948 <1/2>

    ===

    Keres vs Reshevsky, 1948 <1/2>

    #################################

    <Round 9>

    Smyslov vs Euwe, 1948 <1-0>

    ===

    Reshevsky vs Botvinnik, 1948 <1/2>

    #################################

    <Round 10>

    Euwe vs Reshevsky, 1948 <1/2>

    ===

    Botvinnik vs Keres, 1948 <1-0>

    Botvinnik:

    <Before the departure of the Soviet players (Botvinnik, Keres and Smyslov) for the Netherlands, a conflict unfortunately arose, leading to heated arguments over the scheduling of the Dutch half of the Match-Tournament. The rounds had been scheduled without considering the elementary requirements of a sporting event. A tournament should be so paced as to allow its participants to accustom themselves to a definite rhythm of play. Then, and only then, can you expect to see superlative creative achievements.

    The Dutch organizers felt this was of little consequence, failing to see that a string of free days (owing to holidays, and to the fact that we had an odd number of players) would upset this playing rhythm, and put a player off his stride.

    When I discovered that one of the players would end up with <<<six straight "rest" days,>>> just before the final round of the second cycle, I suggested to my colleagues Keres and Smyslov that we register joint protest. Alas, they did not support me! And so I told them, most sincerely, "Just wait; when we get to the Hague, one of you will get six days of rest, and lose like a child on the seventh day." Now the first part of my prophecy had been fulfilled. After six days' rest, Keres sat across from me, pale as death, quite obviously afraid that the second part of my prophecy would also come to pass!>

    Botvinnik's final move:

    23.Qd4-e3


    click for larger view

    Botvinnik:

    <This quiet move forces mate.

    With only seconds remaining, Keres <<<stopped the clocks>>>. Then, without a word, he signed the scoresheets, rose and left. Poor Paul was probably thinking less of chess during this game than of the mistake he had made before he even left Moscow...>

    Mikhail Botvinnik, "15 Games and their Stories" Jim Marfia, transl. (Chess Enterprise Inc. 1982), pp. 40-42

    #################################

    <Leg Two: Moscow>

    <Round 11>

    Smyslov vs Reshevsky, 1948 <1-0>

    ===

    Euwe vs Keres, 1948 <0-1>

    #################################

    <Round 12>

    Keres vs Smyslov, 1948 <1/2>

    ===

    Botvinnik vs Euwe, 1948 <1-0>

    #################################

    <Round 13>

    Reshevsky vs Keres, 1948 <0-1>

    ===

    Smyslov vs Botvinnik, 1948 <0-1

    #################################

    <Round 14>

    Botvinnik vs Reshevsky, 1948 <0-1>

    Botvinnik's first loss in the tournament.

    ===

    Euwe vs Smyslov, 1948 <1-0>

    #################################

    <Round 15>

    Reshevsky vs Euwe, 1948 <1/2>

    ===

    Keres vs Botvinnik, 1948 <0-1>

    #################################

    <Round 16>

    Reshevsky vs Smyslov, 1948 <1/2>

    ===

    Keres vs Euwe, 1948 <1-0>

    #################################

    <Round 17>

    Smyslov vs Keres, 1948 <1-0>

    ===

    Euwe vs Botvinnik, 1948 <1/2>

    #################################

    <Round 18>

    Botvinnik vs Smyslov, 1948 <1/2>

    ===

    Keres vs Reshevsky, 1948 <0-1>

    #################################

    <Round 19>

    Smyslov vs Euwe, 1948 <1-0>

    ===

    Reshevsky vs Botvinnik, 1948 <0-1>

    #################################

    <Round 20>

    Botvinnik vs Keres, 1948 <1-0>

    ===

    Euwe vs Reshevsky, 1948 <0-1>

    #################################

    <Round 21>

    Euwe vs Keres, 1948 <0-1>

    ===

    Smyslov vs Reshevsky, 1948 <1/2>

    #################################

    <Round 22>

    9 May

    Botvinnik clinches 1st place

    Botvinnik vs Euwe, 1948 <1/2>

    <Botvinnik>:

    <"Here I felt that I simply could not play any longer, and offered my opponent a draw. Since Euwe, the former World Champion, had a decidedly unhappy tourament score at this point, I had no doubt that he would accept the offer. But to my surprise, Euwe unexpectedly said that he would like to play a little longer. I was angered; my fighting spirit immediately returned.

    <<<'Fine,' I said, 'let's play on, then.'>>>

    Euwe felt the change in the atmosphere, and extended his hand to congratulate me on winning the tournament.">

    Mikhail Botvinnik
    "15 Games and Their Stories"
    Jim Marfia, transl.
    (Chess Enterprises Inc. 1982), p.49

    ===

    EDIT <thomastonk>:

    <<WCC Editing Project: I wonder if Euwe's side of the story exists ...> Yes, it does, of course. Euwe wrote in 1948 a book on the match tournament in Dutch (a German version has been printed as well, and the English translation was published quite recently). Euwe stated that he accepted the draw and showed two possible lines to support the drawish character of the position. He does not report on a first and a second offer. Nothing special, and why should he be surprised by the draw offer and "lost nerves" as the German edtion of Botvinnik's book claims. The only one who could have lost nerves - in a positive sense - was the new champion, I think.

    thomastonk: Several Dutch newspapers reported that the game was drawn after 15 moves, and I've seen none that mentioned 14 moves. "The Times" based on Reuter reportet this, too. Euwe wrote that 11.0-0-0 was broadcasted from Moscow ...

    There are many ways to *make* this an interesting game.>

    ===

    <Harry Golombek> Eye witness account:

    <"Botwinnik was taking no chances, and Dr. Euwe, last beyond a shadow of doubt, had little incentive to play for a win... Botwinnik exchanged off the gambit Pawn on the fourth move, made as if to embark on a minority attack on the Q side, and then proposed a draw, which Dr. Euwe <<<readily>>> accepted.">

    Harry Golombek, "The World Chess Championship 1948" (Harding Simpole 1949), p.204

    =======

    Two more eye witness accounts:

    <D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde>:

    <"With a draw sufficient to win... Botvinnik went directly to his task in the twenty-second round... When <<<his offer of a draw was accepted,>>> the partisan audience burst into enthusiastic cheers at this triumph of Soviet chess.">

    ==========

    <Hans Kmoch>:

    <"14... KR-K1. At this point, <<<Botvinnik offered a draw>>> and Euwe accepted.">

    Both of these accounts appear in

    D.A. Yanofsky and H.J. Slavekoorde, "Battle Royal... A Round by Round Account of the Thrilling Contest for the World's Chess Title." "Chess Life and Review" (August 1948), p.11

    ===

    Keres vs Smyslov, 1948 <1/2>

    ################################

    <Round 23>

    Smyslov vs Botvinnik, 1948 <1/2>

    ===

    Reshevsky vs Keres, 1948 <1/2>

    #################################

    <Round 24>

    Euwe vs Smyslov, 1948 <0-1>

    ===

    Botvinnik vs Reshevsky, 1948 <1-0>

    #################################

    <Round 25>

    Keres vs Botvinnik, 1948 <1-0>

    ===

    Reshevsky vs Euwe, 1948 <1-0>

    ##############################

    <AFTERMATH>

    Keres allegedly "throwing games" to Botvinnik" controversy:

    <Taylor Kingston>

    ###################################

    <Prague 1946> Crosstable:

    http://www.thechesslibrary.com/file...

    Dates: October 2 - 22
    Note: Treybal Memorial
    Source: Di Felice p.285,

    3 games, 1948

  5. Women's Chess Games (2008)
    Selected Games and Tournament Information
    from Women Chess Players 2008.

    <FIDE World KO Championship:>

    Alexandra Kosteniuk would be the 2008 World Champion played in Nalchik RUS. See her games: Women's World Championship Knockout Tournament (2008)/Alexandra Kosteniuk. See all games: Women's World Championship Knockout Tournament (2008). Crosstable: Women's World Championship Knockout Tournament (2008). Chessbase report after round 1: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.... All Chessbase reports: http://www.chessbase.com/eventlist.....

    <Championships:>

    Kateryna Lagno won the 2008 European Individual Championship played in Plovdiv BUL with a score of 8.5/11 (+6-0=5). See her games at: European Championship (Women) (2008)/Kateryna Lagno. Former Champion Tatiana Kosintseva did not play, but would win in 2009. See the results at: http://chess-results.com/tnr12086.a.... See all the games: European Championship (Women) (2008).

    Sophie Milliet is the 2008 French Women Champion with a score of 8.5/11 (+6-0=5). See her games: French Championship (Women) (2008)/Sophie Milliet. See all the games:
    French Championship (Women) (2008)

    Also included are selected games from the Dutch Women's Championship, Hilversum NED 2008 won by Zhaoqin Peng for the tenth time.

    Anna Zatonskih beats Irina Krush in the tiebreaks to become the new American Women's Champion. The final game was a controversial armageddon: See all the games: US Women's Championship (2008)

    Katerina Nemcova is the European U-18 (Girls) Champion. Tournament played in Herceg Novi, MNE.

    <Tournaments:>

    IM Anna Muzychuk won the Moscow Open Group C with an outstanding score 0f 8/9 http://chess-results.com/tnr10296.a... See some of her games:Moscow Open-A (2008)/Anna Muzychuk

    It was the strongest women's tournament in history – category 11, Elo average 2522. The 2008 North Urals Cup in Krasnoturinsk, Russia, was won by the former World Champion (2004) Antoaneta Stefanova over a strong field. See the Chessbase article. http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.... See all the games at: North Urals Cup (2008).

    See Irina Krush 's games from The Corus Tournament 2008 in Wijk ann Zee NED where she scored 7/13 (+5 -4 =4): Corus Group C (2008)/Irina Krush.

    The Isbank Ataturk Women Masters Tournament was won by Yifan Hou with an undefeated score 7/9 (+5-0=4) ahead of Pia Cramling. See all the games: Isbank Ataturk Women Masters (2008)

    Selected women's games: Aeroflot Open (2008)/Marie Sebag.

    Selected women's games: Corus Group B (2008)/Yifan Hou.

    >Other Tournaments:>

    Fifth Elizaveta Bykova Memorial Tournament in Vladimir RUS 2008 was won by Natalia Zdebskaja (Ukraine): Great pictures and games in PGN see: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail....

    <Olympiads:>

    Selected games from the 2008 Women's Olympiad, Dresden GER. Metal winners were Georgia(Gold), Ukraine(Silver), USA(Bronze). The Georgian Team was led by GM Maia Chiburdanidze with 7.5/9. See the games: Dresden Olympiad (Women) (2008).


    94 games, 2008

  6. World Championship (2023): Nepo - Ding
    Magnus Carlsen declined to defend his title and so the world championship is between the winner of the 2022 FIDE Candidates tournament, Ian Nepomniachtchi (age: 32 years) from Russia, and the runner-up Ding Liren (age: 30 years) from China. Nepomniachtchi scored +5 -0 =9 while Ding scored +4 -2 =8 in the tournament against a field consisting of Teimour Radjabov (AZE), Hikaru Nakamura (USA), Fabiano Caruana (USA), Alireza Firouzja (IRN), Richard Rapport (HUN), and Jan-Krzysztof Duda (POL). Nepomniachtchi previously lost to Magnus Carlsen in the 2021 World Championship. The present match will take place in Astana, Kazakhstan from April 9 to April 30 and will consist of 14 games, plus tiebreaks if required.
    18 games, 2023

  7. Xadrez Básico - D'Agostini
    Xadrez Basico (Basic Chess) - Orfeu Gilberto D'Agostini (1954)

    Games not in this database:
    Fogel vs Moshe Czerniak (Jerusalem, 1935) - 483

    46 games, 1839-1954

  8. y1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise
    The Romantic Era of relentless attack slowly fades as World Champion Wilhelm Steinitz espoused "Accumulate small advantages."

    Well, maybe not just yet. Take a look at these sweet games! There's plenty of romance cookin' in here. This is a wonderful era of thrashin' action.

    Order of Appearance:
    - Chess Variants
    - C20s Generally Unsound King Pawn attempts
    - A00-A99 Flank Openings
    - C21-C90 Open Games
    - D00-D99 Queen Pawn Games
    - E00-E99 Indian Defenses (Rare in this era)
    - D00 Stonewall Attack
    - C00-C19 French Defense
    - B00-B99 Semi-Open Games
    - C39 King's Gambit Accepted,
    - C37 King's Gambit Accepted, Muzio Gambit

    * Fabulous chess brilliancies:
    https://www.chess.com/article/view/...

    * Annotated games from the 6th American Chess Congress: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

    * Reuben Fine's book:
    Game Collection: World's Great Chess Games (Fine)

    This poem is dedicated to all members
    who strive to become Masters of chess.

    yakisoba's combination

    in the middle of a cold Canadian winter night
    a phantom creature was riding a stallion knight
    but lo and behold it is the man called yakisoba
    together with a bishop and queen chasing nova.
    though the old bishop was getting pooped out
    the merry queen in her glory was bouncing about
    while riding hard yakisoba grinningly thought
    "I know what to do with that nova when caught."
    there on top of the castle was nova in hiding
    strapped to a kite for a quick get-away gliding, then trembling he realized to his consternation: he was being killed by the bishop-queen combination.

    * Weird is what you're not used to: https://chessentials.com/weird-ches...

    limerick, entitled ‘The Solver’s Plight’ was by ‘A.J.F.’ [A.J. Fink] and was published on page 22 of Chess Potpourri by Alfred C. Klahre (Middletown, 1931):

    There was a man from Vancouver
    Who tried to solve a two-mover;
    But the boob, he said, ‘“Gee”,
    I can’t find the “Kee”,
    No matter HOW I manouvre.’

    Paul Revere’s Ride
    Henry Wadsworth Longfellow - 1807-1882

    Listen, my children, and you shall hear
    Of the midnight ride of Paul Revere,
    On the eighteenth of April, in Seventy-Five:
    Hardly a man is now alive
    Who remembers that famous day and year.

    He said to his friend, “If the British march
    By land or sea from the town to-night,
    Hang a lantern aloft in the belfry-arch
    Of the North-Church-tower, as a signal-light,— One if by land, and two if by sea;
    And I on the opposite shore will be,
    Ready to ride and spread the alarm
    Through every Middlesex village and farm,
    For the country-folk to be up and to arm.”

    Then he said “Good night!” and with muffled oar Silently rowed to the Charlestown shore,
    Just as the moon rose over the bay,
    Where swinging wide at her moorings lay
    The Somerset, British man-of-war:
    A phantom ship, with each mast and spar
    Across the moon, like a prison-bar,
    And a huge black hulk, that was magnified
    By its own reflection in the tide.

    Meanwhile, his friend, through alley and street
    Wanders and watches with eager ears,
    Till in the silence around him he hears
    The muster of men at the barrack door,
    The sound of arms, and the tramp of feet,
    And the measured tread of the grenadiers
    Marching down to their boats on the shore.

    Then he climbed to the tower of the church,
    Up the wooden stairs, with stealthy tread,
    To the belfry-chamber overhead,
    And startled the pigeons from their perch
    On the sombre rafters, that round him made
    Masses and moving shapes of shade,—
    By the trembling ladder, steep and tall,
    To the highest window in the wall,
    Where he paused to listen and look down
    A moment on the roofs of the town,
    And the moonlight flowing over all.

    Beneath, in the churchyard, lay the dead,
    In their night-encampment on the hill,
    Wrapped in silence so deep and still
    That he could hear, like a sentinel’s tread,
    The watchful night-wind, as it went
    Creeping along from tent to tent,
    And seeming to whisper, “All is well!”
    A moment only he feels the spell
    Of the place and the hour, and the secret dread
    Of the lonely belfry and the dead;
    For suddenly all his thoughts are bent
    On a shadowy something far away,
    Where the river widens to meet the bay,—
    A line of black, that bends and floats
    On the rising tide, like a bridge of boats.

    Meanwhile, impatient to mount and ride,
    Booted and spurred, with a heavy stride,
    On the opposite shore walked Paul Revere.
    Now he patted his horse’s side,
    Now gazed on the landscape far and near,
    Then impetuous stamped the earth,
    And turned and tightened his saddle-girth;
    But mostly he watched with eager search
    The belfry-tower of the old North Church,
    As it rose above the graves on the hill,
    Lonely and spectral and sombre and still.
    And lo! as he looks, on the belfry’s height,
    A glimmer, and then a gleam of light!
    He springs to the saddle, the bridle he turns,
    But lingers and gazes, till full on his sight
    A second lamp in the belfry burns!

    A hurry of hoofs in a village-street,
    A shape in the moonlight, a bulk in the dark,
    And beneath from the pebbles, in passing, a spark Struck out by a steed that flies fearless and fleet: That was all! And yet, through the gloom and the light, The fate of a nation was riding that night;
    And the spark struck out by that steed, in his flight, Kindled the land into flame with its heat.

    He has left the village and mounted the steep,
    And beneath him, tranquil and broad and deep,
    Is the Mystic, meeting the ocean tides;
    And under the alders, that skirt its edge,
    Now soft on the sand, now loud on the ledge,
    Is heard the tramp of his steed as he rides.

    It was twelve by the village clock
    When he crossed the bridge into Medford town.
    He heard the crowing of the cock,
    And the barking of the farmer’s dog,
    And felt the damp of the river-fog,
    That rises when the sun goes down.

    It was one by the village clock,
    When he galloped into Lexington.
    He saw the gilded weathercock
    Swim in the moonlight as he passed,
    And the meeting-house windows, blank and bare,
    Gaze at him with a spectral glare,
    As if they already stood aghast
    At the bloody work they would look upon.

    It was two by the village clock,
    When he came to the bridge in Concord town.
    He heard the bleating of the flock,
    And the twitter of birds among the trees,
    And felt the breath of the morning breeze
    Blowing over the meadows brown.
    And one was safe and asleep in his bed
    Who at the bridge would be first to fall,
    Who that day would be lying dead,
    Pierced by a British musket-ball.

    You know the rest. In the books you have read,
    How the British Regulars fired and fled,—
    How the farmers gave them ball for ball,
    From behind each fence and farmyard-wall,
    Chasing the red-coats down the lane,
    Then crossing the fields to emerge again
    Under the trees at the turn of the road,
    And only pausing to fire and load.

    So through the night rode Paul Revere;
    And so through the night went his cry of alarm
    To every Middlesex village and farm,—
    A cry of defiance, and not of fear,
    A voice in the darkness, a knock at the door,
    And a word that shall echo forevermore!
    For, borne on the night-wind of the Past,
    Through all our history, to the last,
    In the hour of darkness and peril and need,
    The people will waken and listen to hear
    The hurrying hoof-beats of that steed,
    And the midnight message of Paul Revere.

    <Atterdag: Geoff - are you a descendant of Wordsworth?: There was a time when meadow, grove, and stream, The earth, and every common sight, To me did seem
    Apparell'd in celestial light,
    The glory and the freshness of a dream.
    It is not now as it hath been of yore;—
    Turn wheresoe'er I may,
    By night or day,
    The things which I have seen I now can see no more. :-)

    Sally Simpson: Hi Atterdag,
    This is my tribute to Wordsworth. (Daffodils.)

    I wandered lonely as a pawn,
    o'er a field coloured brown and cream,
    When suddenly I ran out of squares
    and discovered I was now a Queen.>

    Isolated pawns require a very expensive therapy, for keeping them alive.

    “Friend, you don't have to earn God's love or try harder. You're precious in His sight, covered by the priceless blood of Jesus, and indwelt by His Holy Spirit. Don't hide your heart or fear you're not good enough for Him to care for you. Accept His love, obey Him, and allow Him to keep you in His wonderful freedom.” ― Charles F. Stanley

    Psalm 27:1
    The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The Lord is the stronghold of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

    1 John 4:18
    There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love.

    Question: What’s the brightest star in the sky? Answer: Sirius – also known as the Dog Star or Sirius A, Sirius is the brightest star in Earth’s night sky. The star is outshone only by several planets and the International Space Station.

    Question: What’s the difference between a cemetery and a graveyard? Answer: Graveyards are attached to churches while cemeteries are stand-alone.

    Patty Loveless "You'll Never Leave Harlan Alive" https://www.bing.com/videos/rivervi...

    Proverbs 14:29-35

    29 He who is slow to anger has great understanding, But he who is quick-tempered * exalts folly. 30 A tranquil heart is life to the body, But passion is rottenness to the bones. 31 He who oppresses the poor taunts his Maker, But he who is gracious to the needy honors Him. 32 The wicked is thrust down by his wrongdoing, But the righteous has a refuge when he dies. 33 Wisdom rests in the heart of one who has understanding, But in the hearts of fools it is made known. 34 Righteousness exalts a nation, But sin is a disgrace to any people. 35 The king's favor is toward a servant who acts wisely, But his anger is toward him who acts shamefully.

    Mercury is the smallest planet in the solar system, approximately 3000 miles (4850 km) in diameter, hardly larger than the moon. Despite being the smallest, it’s extremely dense. In fact, it’s the second densest planet after Earth. It’s also the closest planet to the sun, making it dangerous to explore. Mercury is 48 million miles from the earth.

    Z is for Zookeeper (to the tune of “Do You Know the Muffin Man?”)

    Oh do you know the zookeeper,
    The zookeeper, the zookeeper?
    Oh, do you know the zookeeper
    Who works down at the zoo?

    Q: Why did the cow cross the road?
    A: To get to the udder side.


    497 games, 1560-1975

  9. yAttacks and Sacs of f7 Vol. IV by Fredthebear
    The hits just keep on coming.

    Thank you Sneaky Pete.

    “Win with grace, lose with dignity!” ― Susan Polgar

    “What does it take to be a champion? Desire, dedication, determination, personal and professional discipline, focus, concentration, strong nerves, the will to win, and yes, talent!” ― Susan Polgar

    “No matter how successful you are (or will be), never ever forget the people who helped you along the way, and pay it forward! Don’t become arrogant and conceited just because you gained a few rating points or made a few bucks. Stay humble and be nice, especially to your fans!” ― Susan Polgar

    * Fabulous chess brilliancies:
    https://www.chess.com/article/view/...

    * Adolf Anderssen miniatures: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

    * Brutal Attacking Chess: Game Collection: Brutal Attacking Chess

    * Mato shows: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ber...

    * Women: https://www.thefamouspeople.com/wom...

    The Oracle and the Atheist

    That man his Maker can deceive,
    Is monstrous folly to believe.
    The labyrinthine mazes of the heart
    Are open to His eyes in every part.
    Whatever one may do, or think, or feel,
    From Him no darkness can the thing conceal.
    A pagan once, of graceless heart and hollow,
    Whose faith in gods, I'm apprehensive,
    Was quite as real as expensive.
    Consulted, at his shrine, the god Apollo.
    "Is what I hold alive, or not?"
    Said he, – a sparrow having brought,
    Prepared to wring its neck, or let it fly,
    As need might be, to give the god the lie.
    Apollo saw the trick,
    And answered quick,
    "Dead or alive, show me your sparrow,
    And cease to set for me a trap
    Which can but cause yourself mishap.
    I see afar, and far I shoot my arrow."

    * Opening Tree: https://www.shredderchess.com/onlin...

    Question: What’s the brightest star in the sky? Answer: Sirius – also known as the Dog Star or Sirius A, Sirius is the brightest star in Earth’s night sky. The star is outshone only by several planets and the International Space Station.

    Question: What’s the difference between a cemetery and a graveyard? Answer: Graveyards are attached to churches while cemeteries are stand-alone.

    Patty Loveless "You'll Never Leave Harlan Alive" https://www.bing.com/videos/rivervi...


    498 games, 1620-2017

  10. yDecoys To, Deflections From, Remove the Guard
    The hits just keep on comin'.

    * Starting Out: French Defense: Game Collection: Starting out : The French

    * Gambits against the French Defense:
    Game Collection: alapin gambit -alapin diemer gambit + reti gam

    * Here's a link to common Checkmate Patterns:
    http://gambiter.com/chess/Checkmate...

    * Here's a link to some fabulous chess brilliancies: https://www.chess.com/article/view/...

    * Mr. Harvey's Puzzle Challenge: https://wtharvey.com/

    * Women: https://www.thefamouspeople.com/wom...

    * Best Games of 2018: Game Collection: Best Games of 2018

    * Glossary: https://www.peoriachess.com/Glossar...

    How many chess openings are there?

    Well, White has 20 possible 1st moves. Black can respond with 20 of its own. That’s 400, and we’re ready for move 2. I don’t know them, but I would not be at all surprised if there was a name for each of them. People are like that. You really, really don’t need to know them all.

    If you follow the rules of thumb for good opening play, I promise you that you’ll be playing a named opening. Just put the 1st 3 moves in google, and you’ll get the opening’s name. With that information you can find other games that started the way your game started, likely by some very good players. Also, with the name you can read about it on Wikipedia, and find out what people think of it, who plays it, and its particular traps and idiosyncrasies.

    Once again, The Rules of Thumb for Good Opening Play:

    - Develop your pieces quickly with an eye towards controlling the center. Not necessarily occupying the center but controlling it certainly. - Castle your king just as soon as it’s practical to do so. - Really try not to move a piece more than once during the opening, it’s a waste of valuable time. - Connect your rooks. This marks the end of the opening. Connected rooks means that only your rooks and your castled king are on the back rank. - Respond to threats appropriately, even if you have to break the rules. They’re rules of thumb, not scripture, or physical laws.

    If you and your opponent follow these rules of thumb, you’ll reach the middle game ready to fight. If only you follow these rules of thumb, you’re already winning! Good Hunting. -- Eric H.

    Question: What’s the brightest star in the sky? Answer: Sirius – also known as the Dog Star or Sirius A, Sirius is the brightest star in Earth’s night sky. The star is outshone only by several planets and the International Space Station.

    Question: What’s the difference between a cemetery and a graveyard? Answer: Graveyards are attached to churches while cemeteries are stand-alone.

    Patty Loveless "You'll Never Leave Harlan Alive" https://www.bing.com/videos/rivervi...


    498 games, 1625-2017

<< previous | page 9 of 9 | next >>

SEARCH ENTIRE GAME COLLECTION DATABASE
use these two forms to locate other game collections in the database

Search by Keyword:

EXAMPLE: Search for "QUEEN SAC" or "ENDING".
Search by Username:


NOTE: You must type their screen-name exactly.
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC