chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky
Spassky 
 

Number of games in database: 2,498
Years covered: 1948 to 2010
Last FIDE rating: 2548
Highest rating achieved in database: 2690
Overall record: +821 -216 =1370 (62.6%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 91 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (238) 
    B25 B20 B23 B45 B43
 Ruy Lopez (140) 
    C92 C77 C95 C78 C73
 French Defense (98) 
    C18 C11 C16 C19 C17
 Nimzo Indian (83) 
    E30 E46 E31 E41 E45
 Caro-Kann (78) 
    B18 B17 B12 B16 B14
 Ruy Lopez, Closed (66) 
    C92 C95 C93 C96 C98
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (249) 
    C95 C64 C84 C92 C65
 Ruy Lopez, Closed (140) 
    C95 C84 C92 C93 C89
 Sicilian (130) 
    B83 B81 B31 B80 B84
 Orthodox Defense (95) 
    D58 D55 D59 D50 D56
 Queen's Gambit Declined (83) 
    D37 D35 D31 D30 D06
 Nimzo Indian (81) 
    E59 E21 E47 E53 E42
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Larsen vs Spassky, 1970 0-1
   Spassky vs Bronstein, 1960 1-0
   Spassky vs Petrosian, 1969 1-0
   Spassky vs Fischer, 1960 1-0
   Spassky vs Petrosian, 1969 1-0
   Spassky vs Geller, 1968 1-0
   Spassky vs Fischer, 1972 1-0
   Spassky vs Fischer, 1972 1-0
   Spassky vs S Avtonomov, 1949 1-0
   G Andruet vs Spassky, 1988 0-1

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Petrosian - Spassky World Championship Match (1966)
   Petrosian - Spassky World Championship Match (1969)
   Spassky - Fischer World Championship Match (1972)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   URS-ch sf Tallinn (1959)
   URS-ch sf Rostov-on-Don (1960)
   Mar del Plata (1960)
   USSR Championship 1961b (1961)
   Riga (1959)
   Trud Championship (1960)
   Belgrade (1964)
   San Juan (1969)
   USSR Championship (1959)
   Capablanca Memorial (1962)
   Brussels OHRA (1985)
   Amsterdam Interzonal (1964)
   Palma de Mallorca (1968)
   Bucharest (1953)
   USSR Championship (1962)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by enog
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by pacercina
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by Goatsrocknroll23
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by PassedPawnDuo
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by webbing1947
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by JoseTigranTalFischer
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by Incremental
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by Retarf
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by jakaiden
   Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by igiene
   Match Spassky! by docjan
   Match Spassky! by amadeus
   Smys mad Spas by fredthebear
   Road to the Championship - Boris Spassky by suenteus po 147

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Boris Spassky
Search Google for Boris Spassky
FIDE player card for Boris Spassky

BORIS SPASSKY
(born Jan-30-1937, died Feb-27-2025, 88 years old) Russia
PRONUNCIATION:
[what is this?]

Boris Vasilievich Spassky was born in Leningrad, USSR. As a child, in 1943, he escaped from the siege of the city by German forces.

Spassky first attracted international attention by finishing equal fourth at Bucharest (1953), celebrating his sixteenth birthday during the event. (Alexander Tolush won, his finest career achievement.) In 1955 Spassky won the World Junior Chess Championship.

Spassky tied for third at the USSR Championship (1955) with World Champion Botvinnik, future champion Tigran Petrosian, and Georgy Ilivitsky, half a point behind Smyslov and Geller, who tied for first. Spassky's performance at the Gothenburg Interzonal (1955) made him, up to that date, both the youngest grandmaster ever, and the youngest ever to qualify for the Candidates tournament. Smyslov won the Amsterdam Candidates (1956).

In 1956, Spassky tied with Mark Taimanov and Yuri Averbakh for first place at the USSR Championship (1956). He fell ill and finished last among the three players in the playoff. Many people expected Spassky to be world champion before his 25th birthday, but his fifth place in the Soviet Championship of 1958 was not enough to qualify him for the Portoroz Interzonal. This was due to a last-round loss to Mikhail Tal (Spassky vs Tal, 1958), which shook him deeply.

After winning one of the four semi-finals by finishing equal first with Rashid Nezhmetdinov Leningrad champion of 1959 [rusbase-1] and 1961 [rusbase-2] and finally Soviet Champion in 1961 [rusbase-3]. Winner of the Russian Zonal [rusbase-4]. Spassky shared the first place with Smyslov and Bent Larsen at Amsterdam 1964 http://www.mark-weeks.com/chess/646.... In 1965 he eliminated Paul Keres, Efim Geller and Mikhail Tal. He faced Tigran Petrosian in the Petrosian - Spassky World Championship Match (1966), but narrowly lost.

As the losing player in the title match, Spassky automatically qualified for the next Candidates cycle, where he overcame Geller, Larsen and Korchnoi. He again faced Petrosian in the 1969 World Championship, and this time prevailed.

Spassky's style of play can be described best as lively and adaptable; this produced many brilliant victories. A position based on his victory in 1960 against David Bronstein was used in the James Bond movie, From Russia With Love. His polite, friendly disposition and entertaining games made him one of the most popular world champions. In the West, his tournament victory at Santa Monica 1966 is the most remembered http://www.worldchesslinks.net/ezqa....

In 1972, Spassky was challenged by Robert James Fischer for the World Championship; Spassky lost, 12½-8½, ending the reign of nearly 25-year Soviet hegemony over the World Championship. In the next year Spassky won the Soviet Championship ahead of many world-class grandmasters, [rusbase-5], including Anatoly Karpov.

In the next series of Candidates matches, Spassky defeated Robert Byrne, but lost to Karpov in their 1974 semifinal match. In 1977 he lost the Candidates final to Viktor Korchnoi, after eliminating Vlastimil Hort and Lajos Portisch. In 1992, Spassky played a rematch with Fischer for US $5 million and lost once again, 10 to 5 (with 15 draws).

Spassky died in Moscow on February 27, 2025.

Wikipedia article: Boris Spassky

https://nsn.fm/sport/umer-10-i-chem...

Last updated: 2025-02-28 17:12:50

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 100; games 1-25 of 2,498  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Korchnoi vs Spassky 1-0121948LeningradB71 Sicilian, Dragon, Levenfish Variation
2. Spassky vs Rodgaisky 0-181948URSB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
3. Spassky vs Shman 1-0351948Trud ChD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
4. Smyslov vs Spassky 1-0211948SimulB76 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
5. Spassky vs A Nikitin  ½-½201949Ch URS (team) (juniors)A18 English, Mikenas-Carls
6. Korchnoi vs Spassky 0-1511949Leningrad Junior ChampionshipB71 Sicilian, Dragon, Levenfish Variation
7. V Liavdansky vs Spassky 0-1511949Leningrad Junior ChampionshipB23 Sicilian, Closed
8. Spassky vs S Avtonomov 1-0211949Leningrad Junior ChampionshipD28 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical
9. Spassky vs A Vilup 1-0271949Leningrad Junior ChampionshipD30 Queen's Gambit Declined
10. V P Zakharov vs Spassky  1-0551949Leningrad Junior ChampionshipB74 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
11. Spassky vs Polugaevsky  ½-½151950USSR Junior Team ChampionshipD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
12. M Aizenshtadt vs Spassky 0-1331951Chigorin Memorial qual-12D50 Queen's Gambit Declined
13. Y Gusev vs Spassky 0-1241951URS-ch qfA00 Uncommon Opening
14. Y Estrin vs Spassky 0-1191951URS-ch qfC44 King's Pawn Game
15. G Chepukaitis vs Spassky 0-1351952MinskC31 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit
16. Korchnoi vs Spassky 0-1471952Leningrad ChampionshipD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
17. Levenfish vs Spassky ½-½321952Leningrad ChampionshipD71 Neo-Grunfeld
18. Furman vs Spassky 0-1361952Leningrad ChampionshipD43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
19. Spassky vs J Yuchtman 1-0281952URS-chT JuniorsE28 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch Variation
20. Taimanov vs Spassky ½-½591952Leningrad ChampionshipD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
21. N Kopilov vs Spassky  0-1381952Leningrad ChampionshipD44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
22. N Vedenski vs Spassky  0-1381952Leningrad ChampionshipD22 Queen's Gambit Accepted
23. B Vladimirov vs Spassky 0-1271953LeningradD25 Queen's Gambit Accepted
24. Spassky vs Smyslov 1-0351953BucharestE31 Nimzo-Indian, Leningrad, Main line
25. Petrosian vs Spassky ½-½151953BucharestD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
 page 1 of 100; games 1-25 of 2,498  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Spassky wins | Spassky loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 63 OF 99 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-28-11  bronkenstein: I dont believe that Botvinnik supported Mao Zedong :)

And he definitely had no access to all that wiki info you linked , so blaming him that way is pointless.

(PS no matter how low my opinion on him , as a person , might be , this is simply bad argument =)

May-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Sourceless Soltis> For Treachery In Zurich at least he had a source: Bronstein's article in 64. Assuming he quoted it accurately, anyone can look up what I think of it. It is interesting to juxtapose Bronstein's comments in the tournament book with the quotes from Treachery in Zurich. Also interesting to track the path of the leaders between rounds 20 and 28, which I'll post on the Bronstein page at some point. I wish cg.com had pages for great historical tournaments.

I have read that Botvinnik made some pro-liberalization remarks at some point between 1948 and 1951 and got in a lot of trouble. But I've never seen a trustworthy source for this.

May-28-11  BobCrisp: <Spassky> should have claimed, like <Tal>, that he was exercising his right to sign on <Fischer>'s behalf.

As for the summer solstice, sorry, <Sourceless Soltis>, I don't think there's any imputation that <Andy> is untrustworthy, merely that he lacks academic rigour.

May-28-11  bronkenstein: <...TK: I believe that some time around 1954, Botvinnik wrote a political article. It had to do with the subject of fomenting socialist revolution in western countries.
YA: Yes, this story was published in our historical magazine a number of years ago [It appeared in Istorichesky Archiv, #2/1993, pp. 58-67]. I read it.
TK: Ah, good. And if I understand correctly, the position Botvinnik espoused was not what the Politburo wanted to hear ...
YA: What he wrote was a letter to the chief editor of Pravda, who was a member of the Politburo. And you know, this incident points out a main problem with Botvinnik; I wrote about it in my memoirs. Botvinnik thought he was champion in everything: chess, politics, economics, and including, by the way, computers. Because you know, for 30 years he worked in the wrong direction in computers.
TK: Yes, he tried to develop a chess “artificial intelligence.” YA: Yes, and the main point is that we don’t know what we file:///C|/Cafe/skittles/skittles.htm (3 of 11) [07/15/2002 8:30:58 AM] The Skittles Room
ourselves think, and Botvinnik wanted to make a machine that works like our brain. But he did not know how our brain works. TK: You are saying that Botvinnik got a “swelled head,” he got too high an opinion of himself?
YA: Oh, he began to think that he was able to do everything. You know, I had a talk with him about this problem, the problem of a chess-playing computer, because I was also an engineer. I also got a proposal to start work on a chess computer, but after some thought, I refused to do such work, because I felt I was too old to start. It is work for the young generation, people who know much more mathematics than Botvinnik and I. This is my point. But because Botvinnik believed he could do anything, he agreed to do these things. And it was the same with economics. You know, in the 1990s, before he died, he wrote also a big thesis about how to transform our economy. I learned this from a man who was the Minister of Economics of our country, and he wrote a negative reply to Botvinnik’s proposal.
And it was just the same with his letter to Pravda. Botvinnik had his own political ideas, that it was possible to transform the world toward communism without a third world war.
TK: Yes, that is what he wrote in 1954, right?
YA: Yes, but the answer from the political secretariat was to the following effect: It is necessary to invite Botvinnik and explain to him his mistakes, and if he still insists on his own opinion, he can no longer be a member of the Communist Party. And then Botvinnik wrote a letter saying “Thank you very much for pointing out my mistakes,” and he dropped the subject. He took a step back....>

From http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour... (part 1 ) and http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour... (part 2 ) , Kingston´s Interwiew with Y Averbakh.

The quoted stuff lies somewhere around 30% ´depth´ in 2nd part.

May-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <bronkenstein>

Thanks.

<And it was just the same with his letter to Pravda. Botvinnik had his own political ideas, that it was possible to transform the world toward communism without a third world war. >

Worth pointing out that this was orthodoxy under Krushchev within a few years of Botvinnik's letter.

Steinitz was the same as Botvinnik; he thought chessplayers should run everything.

May-28-11  bronkenstein: And on Spassky being lazy , we have ˝insider story˝ By Karpov himself , from the Spassky´s training camp just few days before the match with Bobby. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOh0...)

Just few (approx) quotes from Karpov :

<...he was reading ˝Legends of ancient Greece˝ , playing tennis ... he liked to play tennis...>

< ...and for the last 20 days he did nothing...absolutely NOTHING ...>

< ...I was supposed to play the training match with him , we played just one game , I had completely winning position and overlooked a simple tactics ... Spassky won , and he decided that he is ready for Fischer :) ...>

May-28-11  Pygeum Lycopene: what opening line was it that Petrosian admonished Spassky for playing, against Fischer? Basically said to the effect Boris didn't know what he was doing in those games.
May-28-11  AVRO38: < And he definitely had no access to all that wiki info you linked , so blaming him that way is pointless.>

That's the same excuse they used at Nuremberg. It didn't work then either!

May-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: It's not like Botvinnik directly committed any crimes (so the comparison is wrong). At Nuremberg, nobody was sentenced for just being a Nazi - only for the actions committed by them personally.
May-28-11  AVRO38: <It's not like Botvinnik directly committed any crimes>

Cheering on the sidelines as millions of your fellow citizens are being executed for political reasons is probably not a crime, but it makes Botvinnik a despicable human being who is probably not even worthy of being called a human being.

May-28-11  bronkenstein: <That's the same excuse they used at Nuremberg. It didn't work then either!>

They hanged all the SS oficers because of wiki? Any links ?

May-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <AVRO38>

<Cheering on the sidelines as millions of your fellow citizens are being executed for political reasons is probably not a crime, but it makes Botvinnik a despicable human being who is probably not even worthy of being called a human being.>

Cheering on the sidelines? Got any pictures?

May-29-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <keypusher: ....I have read that Botvinnik made some pro-liberalization remarks at some point between 1948 and 1951 and got in a lot of trouble. But I've never seen a trustworthy source for this.>

This is one I'd never heard, and certainly goes against Botvinnik's image as the personification of Soviet Man.

<AVRO38: <It's not like Botvinnik directly committed any crimes> Cheering on the sidelines as millions of your fellow citizens are being executed for political reasons is probably not a crime, but it makes Botvinnik a despicable human being who is probably not even worthy of being called a human being.>

Neither did Keres, so far as we know, but he was fortunate to escape the hangman's noose.

While I agree that if Botvinnik did such a thing, he was a slime bucket, I'd be more than slightly curious to see some corroboration before making such an accusation.

May-29-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <perfidious> Re Botvinnik, see the Yuri Averbakh interview brokenstein posted. Assuming it is the same, I had the year and the topic wrong.
May-30-11  Pygeum Lycopene: <"Why on earth did Spassky permit the Nimzo-Indian in game five?" Petrosian wanted to know. The champion was hopeless in Nimzo-Indian-type positions, both as white and black.>

'BF goes to war'

(maybe rumored distaste was mutual)

May-30-11  BUNA: <keypusher: ....I have read that Botvinnik made some pro-liberalization remarks at some point between 1948 and 1951 and got in a lot of trouble. But I've never seen a trustworthy source for this.>

An article about the possible victory of Socialism in the west shouldn't count as "pro-liberalization remarks", should it?

What you refer to is probably Botvinnik's greeting of the soviet recognition of the jewish state in 1948. He wrote a letter (to Prawda?) at that time (and might have gotten into trouble afterwards ...).

The other well known "liberal act" was Botvinniks refusal to sign the petition against Korchnoi. But he didn't comment on that. =)

Then again Averbachs interview to me sounds strange. Should we believe, that a guy, that was known for his preparation, would offer a unprepared solution "to everything"? And contrary to Averbachs suggestions ("the man who thought he could do everything") Botvinnik did apparently work on chess computers/programs. For quite some time.

His first article regarding that topic was received with some scepsis, and Simagin (then in some kind of charge of '64') gave it a try. At least thats the offical story (I wasn't there), published in Simagins tome of the small black series.

May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <BUNA>

<An article about the possible victory of Socialism in the west shouldn't count as "pro-liberalization remarks", should it?>

Victory without war was considered very "pro-liberalization" and occasioned complete disgust in China. See below, "Two Different Lines on War and Peace" and "Peaceful Coexistence -- Two Diametrically Opposed Policies."

http://www.marx2mao.com/Other/PGLtc...

May-30-11  BobCrisp: <And contrary to Averbachs suggestions ("the man who thought he could do everything") Botvinnik did apparently work on chess computers/programs. For quite some time.>

<Averbach> didn't say <Botvinnik> didn't work on chess computers. On the contrary, <Because you know, for 30 years he worked in the wrong direction in computers.>

May-30-11  Everett: Averbach was also very dismissive of Bronstein's claims re: Zurich.
May-31-11  Albertan: London Telegraph (2005)

Outrage in Russia as Spassky puts name to rabidly anti-Semitic petition

By Bojan Pancevski

Boris Spassky, the former chess world champion, has caused uproar in Russia by signing a petition that demands the country's state prosecutor bans a number of Jewish organisations.

Spassky was among 5,000 Russians who put their name to a letter calling for a ban on all religious and national groups acting on the principles of the Shulchan Aruch, a repository of Jewish law originally written in the 1560s.

The "Letter of 5,000", sent three weeks ago, branded Judaism "anti-Christian and inhumane" and accused believers of "committing ritual murders".

It warned of a "hidden campaign of genocide against the Russian people and their traditional society and values", and was backed with quotes from anti-Semitic literature from the 19th century.

Late on Friday, after constant criticism from religious leaders and figures in the chess world, Spassky tried to distance himself from the campaign. He did not deny that he had signed it, but said: "The appearance of my name was a mistake. As a 'Chess King' I have always tried to fortify and unite the multinational kingdom of chess, and not to cause division within it. I will remain faithful to that principle in my old age."

Evgeny Gik, a Russian chess master and writer who is a long-term acquaintance of Spassky, had condemned the letter in a Russian newspaper. He recalled how, in the 1990s, Spassky travelled from his home in France to the St Petersburg chess club to be the guest of honour at a dinner party.

There, according to Gik, Spassky remarked: "Everything is good in Russia, but I don't know how the Russian people can have allowed so many big-nosed people into government." Gik said that several grandmasters left the table in protest.

Lev Ponomarev, a respected human rights activist, also condemned Spassky's involvement in the letter. "I am ashamed that people of such high moral authority are taking the lead in creating a kind of orthodox Taliban," he said.

Spassky, who was born in 1937 and learned to play chess at five, became world chess champion in 1969 - a title that he held until 1972, when he was beaten by the American, Bobby Fischer. The match was perhaps the most legendary chess duel of all time.

Many leading Soviet-era players were Jewish, including Garry Kasparov, officially the highest-ranked in the world but now retired. The intense competition created a "them and us" division between Jewish and non-Jewish players, who include Spassky. Although this is the first time that Spassky has given vent to anti-Semitic feelings in public, Fischer - whose parents were, in fact, Jewish - has frequently exposed himself as a Holocaust denier and anti-Semite.

In an interview in 1999, he said that Jews were "criminals, parasites, liars and thieves" and described America as a "farce controlled by dirty, hook-nosed, circumcised Jew bastards."

The American was detained in prison in Japan last year for travelling on a passport that had been revoked by the US. He was wanted for breaking a trade embargo by playing a rematch with Spassky in the former Yugoslavia, in 1992. The wording of the petition signed by Spassky was almost identical to an earlier "Letter of 500", signed by key Russian politicians and sent to the prosecutor, Gen Vladimir Ustinov, in January.

Both petitions called for a ban on the sale and publication of the Shulchan Aruch and for Jewish schools to be monitored to stamp out "extremism". Other leading Russians who signed the later letter included the sculptor Vyacheslav Klykov, the mathematician Igor Sharevich, the writer Vassily Belov, and Orthodox church officials.

May-31-11  theagenbiteofinwit: <Boris Spassky, the former chess world champion, has caused uproar in Russia by signing a petition that demands the country's state prosecutor bans a number of Jewish organisations.>

Since when did Russians start believing what they read in print?

This is a new development for me.

Jun-02-11  kingfu: We all say stupid things. Not a crime.

This is why I push steel around a factory in my old age when I should be on the Golf Course.

Words were invented to describe actions. Words, by themselves, are not illegal.

Stupid, yes, in Spassky's case.

Crazy , yes in Fischer's.

Jun-02-11  MaxxLange: I think it sucks if he said these anti-Semitic things, but he's a really old man, and a great great player, and I just don't want to pursue this, personally....the older generation was more prejudiced, maybe he is an example of that
Jun-02-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: There is something about chess world champions and anti-semitism.... Alekhine, Fischer, Spassky...
Jun-02-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Spassky and I are friends and I have never seen him show any antagonism toward an individual due to race. I have heard him discuss specific groups of individuals who happen to be Jews and remark on some behavior. But again, I have never seen him criticise any individual due to race. Ever.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 99)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 63 OF 99 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC