chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vladimir Kramnik
Kramnik 
Photograph copyright © 2007 Milan Kovacs (www.milankovacs.com)  

Number of games in database: 3,250
Years covered: 1984 to 2024
Last FIDE rating: 2753 (2700 rapid, 2670 blitz)
Highest rating achieved in database: 2817
Overall record: +545 -170 =957 (61.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 1578 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 English (154) 
    A15 A14 A17 A13 A16
 Sicilian (147) 
    B90 B30 B33 B52 B92
 Queen's Pawn Game (109) 
    D02 A46 E10 D05 D00
 King's Indian (106) 
    E97 E94 E92 E91 E86
 Reti System (101) 
    A04 A06 A05
 Slav (99) 
    D17 D15 D11 D18 D12
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (270) 
    B33 B30 B31 B62 B65
 Ruy Lopez (182) 
    C67 C65 C84 C78 C95
 Queen's Gambit Declined (123) 
    D37 D35 D38 D39 D31
 Semi-Slav (110) 
    D45 D43 D47 D44 D48
 Petrov (102) 
    C42 C43
 Nimzo Indian (81) 
    E32 E21 E54 E34 E46
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Kramnik vs Leko, 2004 1-0
   Kasparov vs Kramnik, 1996 0-1
   Gelfand vs Kramnik, 1996 0-1
   Kramnik vs Kasparov, 1994 1-0
   Ivanchuk vs Kramnik, 1996 0-1
   Kramnik vs Kasparov, 2000 1-0
   Leko vs Kramnik, 2004 0-1
   Kramnik vs Anand, 2001 1-0
   Topalov vs Kramnik, 1995 0-1
   Kramnik vs Morozevich, 2007 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (1999)
   Kasparov - Kramnik Classical World Championship Match (2000)
   Kramnik - Leko Classical World Championship Match (2004)
   Kramnik - Topalov World Championship Match (2006)
   World Championship Tournament (2007)
   Anand - Kramnik World Championship Match (2008)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Belgrade Investbank (1995)
   New York PCA/Intel-GP (1994)
   Hoogovens Group A (1998)
   Dortmund Sparkassen (2004)
   16th Amber Tournament (Blindfold) (2007)
   Amber Blindfold (2003)
   Dortmund Open-A (1992)
   World Cup (2013)
   Tata Steel Masters (2018)
   Qatar Masters (2014)
   Sao Paulo Latin American Cup Open (1991)
   World Youth U26 Team Championship (1991)
   Legends of Chess (2020)
   Manila Olympiad (1992)
   Biel Interzonal (1993)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Kramnik - My Life and Games by JoseTigranTalFischer
   Kramnik - My Life and Games by Goatsrocknroll23
   Kramnik - My Life and Games by peckinpah
   Kramnik - My Life and Games by pacercina
   Kramnik - My Life and Games by jakaiden
   Kramnik - My Life and Games by Okavango
   Vladi Kramn'd Fredthebear Full of White Russian by fredthebear
   Match Kramnik! by amadeus
   Vladi Others Earthly by fredthebear
   My Life and Games (Kramnik/Damsky) by Qindarka
   Kramnik on a King Hunt & vs the World Champions by visayanbraindoctor
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 75 by 0ZeR0
   Vladimir, the Conqueror by Gottschalk
   Vladimir Kramnik's Best Games by KingG

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 Titled Tuesday Early
   T Rendle vs Kramnik (Dec-10-24) 1-0, blitz
   Kramnik vs Carlsen (Dec-10-24) 1-0, blitz
   Nakamura vs Kramnik (Jul-16-24) 0-1, blitz
   Kramnik vs Carlsen (Jan-02-24) 0-1, blitz
   Svidler vs Kramnik (Sep-26-23) 1-0, rapid

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Vladimir Kramnik
Search Google for Vladimir Kramnik
FIDE player card for Vladimir Kramnik

VLADIMIR KRAMNIK
(born Jun-25-1975, 50 years old) Russia
PRONUNCIATION:
[what is this?]

Former World Champion - and former top ranked player in the world - Vladimir Borisovich Kramnik was born in Tuapse, on the shores of the Black Sea, on June 25, 1975. As a child, Vladimir Kramnik studied in the chess school established by Mikhail Botvinnik. In 2000, he won the Classical World Championship from Garry Kasparov, then won the unified title when he defeated Veselin Topalov in 2006 to become the 14th undisputed World Champion. Kramnik relinquished the title in 2007 to his successor, the 15th undisputed (and now former) World Champion, Viswanathan Anand.

Championships

<Age> In 1991, Kramnik won the World Under 18 Championship in Guarapuava, Brazil.

<National> Kramnik finished equal first in the 1990 RSFSR (Russian) Championship in Kuibyshev, Russia, but placed second on tiebreak, behind Andrei Kharlov. He came third ex aequo in the Russian Championship Superfinal (2013) after a last round battle with Ian Nepomniachtchi for a share of first and the possibility of the title for the first time. However, he lost the game and scored 5.5/9.

<World> Kramnik's early attempts at storming the citadel of the World Championship met with mixed results. In 1994, he lost a Candidates quarter finals match for the PCA championship to Gata Kamsky by 1½-4½, and a few months later he lost a Candidates semi-finals match for the FIDE championship to Boris Gelfand by 3½-4½. In 1998, Kramnik was defeated by Alexey Shirov by 3½-5½ in the Candidates match held in Cazorla to determine the right to play Garry Kasparov for the Classical World Chess Championship. In 1999, Kramnik lost in the quarterfinals of the FIDE knockout championship in Las Vegas to Michael Adams by 2-4, including the 4 game rapid play-off.

Although Shirov had defeated Kramnik for the right to challenge Kasparov, suitable sponsorship was not found for a Kasparov-Shirov match, and it never took place. In 2000, however, sponsorship became available for a Kasparov-Kramnik match instead. This meant that Kramnik was the first player since 1935 - when Alexander Alekhine selected Max Euwe as his challenger - to play a world championship match without qualifying. Kramnik reached the pinnacle by defeating long-time champion Kasparov in the Kasparov - Kramnik Classical World Championship Match (2000) in London by the score of 8½ to 6½ (+2 =13 -0) without losing a game, becoming the next Classical World Champion in the line that started from Wilhelm Steinitz. It was the first time since the Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921) that the defending champion had lost a match without winning a game and it was also the first time Kasparov had lost a World Championship match. Kasparov said of Kramnik that: <"He is the hardest player to beat in the world.">

In 2004, Kramnik successfully defended his title as Classical World Chess Champion against challenger Peter Leko at Brissago, Switzerland, by drawing the Kramnik - Leko Classical World Championship Match (2004) in the last game. Lékó was leading the 14-game match until the final game, which Kramnik won, thus forcing a 7 - 7 draw and ensuring that Kramnik remained world champion. Because of the drawn result, the prize fund of 1 million Swiss francs was split between the two players.

Kramnik refused to participate at the FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005), but indicated his willingness to play a match against the winner to unify the world championship. His next title defence in 2006, therefore, was a reunification match with the new FIDE world title holder from the 2005 tournament, Veselin Topalov. The $1 million Kramnik - Topalov World Championship Match (2006) was played in Elista, Kalmykia from September 21 to October 13 and after controversially forfeiting the fifth game, Kramnik won the rapid game playoff by 2½ -1½ after the classical games were tied 6-6, thereby becoming the first undisputed unified World Chess Champion since the 1993 split. In the following year, Kramnik lost the unified world title when he finished second to Viswanathan Anand at the Mexico City World Championship Tournament (2007). In October 2008, Kramnik exercised his entitlement to a rematch as a challenger to World Champion Anand in Bonn, Germany, but lost the Anand - Kramnik World Championship Match (2008) match by 4½ to 6½ (+1 =7 -3).

Kramnik's tournament performances in 2009 (see below) raised his rating (average of July 2009 and January 2010 ratings) sufficiently to qualify him for the World Championship Candidates (2011). In the first round he beat Teimour Radjabov by the narrowest of margins*: after tieing the classical games 2-2 (+0 =4 -0), and the rapid games 2-2 (+0 =4 -0), he won the blitz playoff by 2.5-1.5 (+2 =1 -1) to move to the semi final match against Alexander Grischuk, which he lost 1.5-0.5 (=1 -1) in the blitz tiebreaker after he drew the classical games 2-2 (+0 -0 =4) and the rapid games 2-2 (+0 -0 =4), thereby eliminating him from the contest. Participating in the World Championship Candidates (2013) on the basis of his rating, Kramnik came =1st with Magnus Carlsen on 8.5/13 after both lost their last round games. As the first tiebreaker (individual score against the other player in the tournament) left them level, the second tiebreaker (greater number of wins in the tournament) relegated Kramnik to second place due to scoring four wins to Carlsen's five.

Kramnik was seeded directly into the World Championship Candidates (2014), as he met the pre-condition that he participate in the World Cup (2013). During the Cup, he defeated Zambian IM Gillan Bwalya in the first round, compatriot GM Mikhail Kobalia in the second round, Ukrainian GM Alexander Areshchenko in the third round, veteran Ukrainian GM and twice former Candidate Vasyl Ivanchuk in the Round of 16 (round four), his third Ukrainian opponent in the shape of GM Anton Korobov in the quarter final (round five), one of the wildcards of the event, French GM Maxime Vachier-Lagrave match in the semi final (round 6) before defeating compatriot GM Dmitry Andreikin in the final by 2.5-1.5 (+1 =3). His win also guaranteed qualification in the World Cup 2015, although he would qualify by rating alone. At the Candidates in March 2014, he placed 3rd with 7/14 behind Anand and Karjakin.

He qualified by rating to play in the World Cup (2015) where he met and defeated Peruvian Deysi Estela Cori Tello and Cuban GM Lazaro Bruzon Batista in the first two rounds to advance to the third round where he lost to Dmitry Andreikin in the first set of rapid game tiebreakers, thereby bowing out of the event.

Tournaments

Kramnik won Chalkidiki 1992 with 7.5/11, and in 1993, he played in Linares, finishing fifth and defeating the then world number three, Vasyl Ivanchuk. Following some solid results in the interim which resulted in him winning the 1994 PCA Intel Grand Prix, major tournament triumphs were soon to follow, such as Dortmund 1995, Horgen 1995, Belgrade 1995, =1st in Dos Hermanas in 1996 and 1997, =1st in Tilburg 1997 (8/11). Dortmund became a favourite stop, as Kramnik has gone on to win nine more times in 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001, Dortmund Sparkassen (2006), Dortmund Sparkassen (2007), Dortmund Sparkassen (2009) and Dortmund Sparkassen (2011), as either equal or clear first; in the 2011 edition of the event he won by 1.5 points despite losing in the last round. In 2000, Kramnik won his first Linares tournament, completing his set of victories in all three of chess' "triple crown" events: Corus, Linares, and Dortmund. Kramnik later captured additional Linares victories in Linares (2003) (shared) and Linares (2004) (outright). He won the Tal Memorial (2007) with 6.5/9, 1.5 ahead of Shirov. Kramnik had exceptionally good results in 2009, winning once again in Dortmund and then winning the Category 21 (average ELO = 2763) Tal Memorial (2009) in Moscow with 6/9 and a TPR of 2883. At the time, the average ELO rating of the field made it the strongest tournament in history. He also participated in the London Chess Classic (2009) in December, finishing second to Magnus Carlsen. These magnificent results qualified him for the 2011 Candidates on the basis of his boosted ratings. Kramnik began 2010 at Corus Group A (2010) in the Netherlands, during which he defeated new world number-one Carlsen with the Black pieces in their head-to-head encounter, ending Carlsen's 36-match unbeaten streak. A late loss to Anand knocked him out of first place, and Kramnik finished with 8/13, tying for second place with Shirov behind Carlsen's 8½ points. He came 2nd in the preliminary Shanghai Masters (2010) to qualify for the Grand Slam Chess Final (2010) against Carlsen and Anand, who had pre-qualified. He then won at Bilbao with +2 -0 =4 over world champion Anand, then-world number one Magnus Carlsen, and Shirov. The 2009 Tal Memorial and the Grand Slam Final at Bilbao were the most powerful tournaments (in ratings terms) ever staged. In late 2011, he easily won the 15th Unive (Crown Group) (2011) with 4.5/6 and a TPR of 2903 and finished the year with outright first at the London Chess Classic (2011) with +4 -0 =4 and a TPR of 2934, recovering ground lost following a mediocre performance in the Tal Memorial (2011) where he failed to win a game. In June 2012, he placed =4th at the category 22 Tal Memorial (2012), with 4.5/9 and in July 2012, =3rd (4th on tiebreak) at the category 19 Dortmund Sparkassen (2012) tournament. Kramnik finished 2012 with a surge, placing 2nd at the London Chess Classic (2012) behind Magnus Carlsen, scoring 6/8 (16 points in the 3-1-0 scoring system used in the event) and a TPR of 2937 to Carlsen's 2994.

His final training preparation for the Candidates tournament in March at the category 21 Zurich Chess Challenge (2013), was less than completely successful in terms of results (2.5/6), drawing five and losing one to Anand, although it seemed to contribute to his game fitness at the Candidates as he placed second by the narrowest of margins, scoring equal to Carlsen who won the event and the right to challenge Anand for the World Championship. He placed =4th with 4.5/9, a point behind the winner, in a low scoring Alekhine Memorial (2013) and then had one of his worse ever results at the Tal Memorial (2013), coming last with 3/9 (+0 -3 =6). However, he returned to form in the Dortmund Sparkassen (2013), placing outright second behind Adams, scoring 6.5/9, jointly dominating the category 19 field to the extent that no other player scored better than 50%. In November 2014, Kramnik competed at the category 20 Petrosian Memorial (2014), and was outright second behind Alexander Grischuk with 4.5/7, signalling a mild return to form after a slump that saw him exit the world's top 10 for the first time since he entered the top 10 in January 1993. There followed 2nd at the powerful Qatar Masters (2014), with 7/9, and =1st at the London Chess Classic (2014).

2015 saw Kramnik starting his competitive year by placing outright 3rd behind the winner Anand and runner-up Hikaru Nakamura, ahead of Sergey Karjakin, Levon Aronian and Fabiano Caruana respectively, in the standard section of the RR category 22 Zurich Chess Challenge (2015). He won the final section of the Zurich event, namely the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2015), but the added points were insufficient to give him the overall lead and he finished with 3rd prize behind Nakamura and Anand respectively. A relatively poor performance at the Gashimov Memorial (2015) where he scored only 4/9 was followed by a solid performance at the Russian Premier League 2015 (see below) and a below average 3.5/7 for fourth place at the annual Dortmund Sparkassen (2015). He saw out the year with equal third, scoring 6.5/9 at the powerful Qatar Masters (2015), half a point behind the joint leaders Magnus Carlsen and the rising Chinese star Yangyi Yu. Kramnik started 2016 with equal third on 5/9 at the Norway Chess (2016) behind Carlsen and Aronian respectively after also coming third in the preliminary Norway Chess (Blitz) (2016) used to determine the draw. Several months later in July he placed =2nd (with 4/7) behind Vachier-Lagrave at Dortmund Sparkassen (2016). Kramnik's year in standard time chess finished with a reasonably efficacious equal third at the London Chess Classic (2016), a point behind the winner Wesley So.

In April 2017, Kramnik was second on tiebreak ahead of co-runners up Wesley So and Veselin Topalov at the category 21 Gashimov Memorial (2017), scoring 5/9, half a point behind the winner Shakhriyar Mamedyarov. Two months later he again placed equal second, this time at the category 22 Norway Chess (2017), scoring 5/9 alongside Hikaru Nakamura, a point behind the winner Levon Aronian.

Team Events

<Olympiads> Kramnik has won three team and and individual gold medals at the Olympiads as well as two team silvers. He played in the gold medal winning Russian teams in the Manila 1992, Moscow 1994 and Yerevan 1996 Olympiads, his first gold medal being awarded to him as an untitled 16 year old in 1992 when he scored eight wins, one draw, and no losses to record a remarkable TPR of 2958. In 1994, he came fifth on the second board with 8/11 and a 2727 TPR. In 1996, he scored a relatively meagre 4.5/9 on the second board. He did not participate in any more Olympiads until Turin Olympiad (2006) in Turin, when he again won a gold medal with overall best performance on the top board with 6.5/9 (2847 TPR). In the Dresden Olympiad (2008) in Dresden, he scored 5/9 on top board and a 2735 TPR. Kramnik played board one for the silver medal winning Russian team in the Khanty-Mansiysk Olympiad (2010) in Khanty-Mansiysk, coming fifth with a scored of 5.5/9, winning 2 and drawing 7 with a TPR of 2794. At the Istanbul Olympiad (2012) held in Istanbul, he again played top board scoring 5/9 and coming 7th on that board, leading his team to another silver medal. At the Tromso Olympiad (2014), he again played board 1 for Russia. He played board two for Russia in the Baku Olympiad (2016), scoring individual gold for his board, and team bronze with his countrymen.

<National Team Events> In 1991, 2490-rated FM Kramnik represented Russia on board 2 at the World U26 Championship played at Maringá; with a perfect score of 6/6 he helped Russia to win gold, and won individual gold for his performance. He played in the European Team Championships on one occasion, in 1992, when the then FM was rated 2590. Again representing Russia, this time on board 3, he helped his team to win gold with a 6/7 effort, and won individual gold for board 3 as well as a gold medal for the best rating performance at the event, that being a 2863 performance, ahead of Kasparov's 2809 performance that won rating silver. That same year (1992), he also played on the USSR team against the Rest of the World. He played for Russia twice in the World Team Championship, in 1993 and 2013. On the first occasion, he lead his country to a bronze medal, and on the second occasion - at the World Team Championship (2013) - to a gold medal.

<European Club Cup> Kramnik participated in the European Club Cup between 1995 and 1999 inclusive, in 2005 and again in 2015 and 2016. He started off playing board one with SV Empor Berlin in 1992 and 1993, moved on to Sberbank-Tatarstan Kazan in 1994 where he helped the club to bronze, then played board one with the powerful Agrouniverzal Zemun team in 1998 and 1999, winning team silver in 1999. Since then, he played for NAO Paris in 2005, winning team bronze and for the Siberia Novosibirsk team in the European Club Cup (2015) and European Club Cup (2016) winning team gold in 2015 as well as an individual gold for board 1.

At the Russian Team Championship (2015), Kramnik played board 1 for Siberia Novosibirsk, winning gold for that board; his effort also helped his team to win gold. He repeated his individual effort in the Russian Team Championship (2016), this time helping his team to a bronze medal in the double round robin 5-team contest.

Matches

In 2004, he won a simul against the German National Team 2½:1½.

In October 2002, Kramnik played an eight game match against Deep Fritz (Computer) in the Brains in Bahrain (2002) match, drawing 4-4 after leading 3-1. In 2006 the German organization Universal Event Promotion (UEP) staged a return match of six games between Kramnik and Deep Fritz in Bonn, which Kramnik lost, +0 -2 =4.

In April 2012, Kramnik and Levon Aronian played, as part of their preparation for the 2012 Candidates Tournament, a six-game training match in Zurich. The Kramnik - Aronian (2012) match was drawn 3-3 (+1 -1 =4). From late November to early December 2016, he played a rapid and blitz match against Yifan Hou at the Kings Tournament in Romania, winning both by significant margins, the rapid by 4.5-0.5 and the latter by 6/9 (+5 -3 =2).

Rapids

Kramnik has been an excellent and consistent performer at rapid and blindfold play. He won or shared the overall lead at Amber in 1996 (outright overall 1st), 1998 (=1st with Shirov with 15/22), 1999 Monaco (14½/22), 2001 (=1st with Topalov with 15/22), 2004 (=1st with Morozevich with 14.5/22), and 2007 (outright overall first with 15½/22). He also won the 2001 rapid play match against Lékó by 7-5, drew the 2001 rapid play Botvinnik Memorial match with Kasparov 3:3 and the 2001 rapid play match against Anand 5:5, lost the 2002 Match Advanced Chess Kramnik vs. Anand (Leon) 3½:2½, was runner up to Anand in the Cap D'Agde FRA (2003), won the 2009 Zurich Champions Rapid (2009) with 5/7 and shared 1st in the 2010 President's Cup in Baku with 5/7. In tandem with the London Classic 2014, Kramnik came =1st in the blitz event and =3rd in the rapid play open.

Kramnik came in equal 5th with 10/15 in the World Rapid Championship (2015), 1.5 points behind the winner Carlsen, and half a point behind the joint runners up Nepomniachtchi, Radjabov and Leinier Dominguez Perez. He followed up the next day with equal second alongside Vachier-Lagrave scoring 15/21, half a point behind the outright winner Alexander Grischuk at the World Blitz Championship (2015).

Ratings

Kramnik entered the top 100 in January 1992 and has remained there since that time. He rose rapidly in the rankings such that a year later in January 1993, he entered the top 10 where he has been ensconced since, apart from a few months in 2014. Yet during that time he made it to world #1 in only two rating periods.

In January 1996, Kramnik became the world top rated player. Although he had the same FIDE rating as Kasparov (2775), He became number one by having played more games during the rating period in question. He became the youngest ever to reach world number-one, breaking Kasparov's record; this record would stand for 14 years until being broken by Magnus Carlsen in January 2010.

Ironically, during his reign as world champion, Kramnik never regained the world number-one ranking, doing so only in January 2008 after he had lost the title to Viswanathan Anand. As in 1996, Kramnik had the same FIDE rating as Anand (2799) but became number-one due to more games played within the rating period. Kramnik's 12 years between world-number one rankings is the longest since the inception of the FIDE ranking system in 1971.

In July 1993 soon after his 18th birthday, he crossed 2700 for the first time and has remained in the 2700+ rating ever since. In April 2001, he became the second of only eight chess players to have reached a rating of 2800 (the first being Kasparov, followed by Anand, Topalov, Carlsen, Aronian, Caruana and Grischuk). Kramnik's highest standard rating to date is 2811 achieved in May 2013 when he was ranked #3 in the world.

Other

In 1995, Kramnik served as a second for Kasparov during the latter's successful defence of his Classical World Chess Championship against Anand, and in an ironic counter point in 2010 he served as a second for Anand during the World Champion's successful defence against Topalov.

Kramnik has a form of arthritis called ankylosing spondylitis. In January 2006, Kramnik announced that he would miss the Corus Group A (2006) to seek treatment for this condition. He returned from treatment in June 2006, playing in the 37th Chess Olympiad, winning gold by top scoring on the top board. Kramnik's performance in winning the Classical World Championship in 2000 won him the Chess Oscar for 2000, while his 2006 victory in the reunification match earned him the Chess Oscar for 2006.

On 30 December 2006 he married French journalist Marie-Laure Germon and they have a daughter, Daria, who was born 28 December 2008, and a son, Vadim, born 28 January 2013.

Sources and references Website: http://www.kramnik.com/; Biography: http://www.kramnik.com/eng/biograph...; Extended and candid interview with Kramnik by Vladislav Tkachiev in August 2011: http://whychess.org/node/1605; Live rating: http://www.2700chess.com/; * http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...; Wikipedia article: Kramnik

Last updated: 2023-11-23 11:45:25

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 130; games 1-25 of 3,250  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Kramnik vs Serdyukov 1-0311984BelorechenskB78 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack, 10.castle long
2. A Oganyan vs Kramnik 0-1311984BelorechenskB89 Sicilian
3. Remezov vs Kramnik  0-1521985KrasnodarB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
4. Zaitsev vs Kramnik 0-1491986Team TournamentB83 Sicilian
5. Kramnik vs Zhukov 1-0381986BelorechenskB43 Sicilian, Kan, 5.Nc3
6. Shilov vs Kramnik 0-1371987USSR Boys' ChampionshipB33 Sicilian
7. Kramnik vs A Chjumachenko 1-0321987GelendzhikB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
8. Kramnik vs Mayorov 1-0341987GelendzhikC12 French, McCutcheon
9. Kramnik vs Otsarev 1-0181987Baku TrainingB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
10. I Odesskij vs Kramnik 0-1251987URS-chT U14A52 Budapest Gambit
11. Yakubovsky vs Kramnik  0-1511987URS-chT U14B23 Sicilian, Closed
12. Yakovich vs Kramnik 1-0421988URSB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
13. Kramnik vs Danislian ½-½601988URS-chT U18B15 Caro-Kann
14. M Golubev vs Kramnik 0-1381988URS-chT U18B33 Sicilian
15. M Sorokin vs Kramnik ½-½521989Chigorin Memorial-BA81 Dutch
16. A V Filipenko vs Kramnik 0-1401989Chigorin Memorial-BB00 Uncommon King's Pawn Opening
17. J Ivanov vs Kramnik ½-½121989Chigorin Memorial-BA85 Dutch, with c4 & Nc3
18. G Kallai vs Kramnik ½-½221989Chigorin Memorial-BA81 Dutch
19. Khenkin vs Kramnik ½-½171989Chigorin Memorial-BD39 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin, Vienna Variation
20. Kramnik vs A Grosar ½-½471989Chigorin Memorial-BB58 Sicilian
21. Kramnik vs A Panchenko ½-½601989Chigorin Memorial-BB58 Sicilian
22. Kramnik vs B Podlesnik 1-0371989Chigorin Memorial-BB33 Sicilian
23. Kramnik vs R Shcherbakov ½-½351989Chigorin Memorial-BB58 Sicilian
24. Kramnik vs G Tunik 0-1381989Chigorin Memorial-BB46 Sicilian, Taimanov Variation
25. Kramnik vs Yakovich ½-½141989Chigorin Memorial-BB33 Sicilian
 page 1 of 130; games 1-25 of 3,250  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Kramnik wins | Kramnik loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 930 OF 1600 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-10-07  KingG: This is one of the better interviews with Kramnik that i have read. I particularly like the questions about his opening repertoire, which i had been wondering about myself.
Feb-10-07  garcia.markina: You can read it in spanish (direct translation russian-spanish) at "Ajedrez en México" (http://aacevedo.galeon.com)

Interview with Kramnik: http://aacevedo.galeon.com/NotInter...

An interview with Topalov:
http://aacevedo.galeon.com/NotInter...

As noted, both interviews were originally published in "Sport-Express", a russian newspaper.

Feb-11-07  alicefujimori: <ivan999>Thanks for the interview, but some part of the interview was rather "crappy", if that's the right word to describe it.

<And I have certain problems in long tournaments like this one, because it is really difficult for me to play for a win with black.>But you didn't have such problems back in the 1990s...The reason why our World Champion had difficulties in playing for a win with black is that he CHOSE to make it difficult for himself with the drop of the Sicilian in his repertiore.

<It is not as important for those who have an "aggressive" repertoire with black,>This is certainly not true. It's never easy to win with black even if you have an "agressive" black repertiore in that level. Is Kramnik "hinting" that it wouldn't have mattered to Topalov if he was the one with one more "black"? :)

<I let Navara escape. That half a point ended up being the difference in the standings. I could have beaten him.>...and Carlsen as well. If Kramnik had played Nd5 he would have a reasonable chance of winning that game.

<But then he acted in a way that was a little primitive.>Coincidently, Bareev used the same words "little primitive" when he was describing on the way that Topalov was cheating. Is this just a coincident? Or...? hmm... :)

<...or if it is something else,>What else could there be, Kramnik? Rybka's/other strong engines' assistence during the opening stages?

<And most of his victories here were achieved because his opponents walked into some very strong novelties.>I also want to see what Kramnik means by these very strong novelties. According to the annotations of Topalov's victories in the many games he played in these 2 or so years, they were achieved in the middle-endgame phase and very seldom due to a strong opening novelty. Maybe Kramnik still had that game where he got crushed by Topalov in around 20 moves on the white side of the Najdorf in 2005 in mind?

<But his play as a whole did not impress me.>....unfortunately, his "inimpressive" play scored more wins than you, Kramnik. :)

Otherwise, the rest of the interview was pretty decent, especially his comments about Radja and Aronian. It's also good to hear something about his personal life.

Feb-11-07  andredj: Congratulations for your new Life mariage! I just dream that your mariage give you passion to create beauty artistic chess, and bring many people inspiration like from your play in 1994-1996 performance,I think you yourself kill the creativeness capability because afraid of losing.Sometimes losing make your skill move forward than you make draw the game in point of spirit view. Like chess sometimes more material not important if your position worst, I just want you live not just for you,but bring inspiration for a lot people because you have amazing talent so don't destroy yourself with dirty politic of chess just proved it on the board!!!
Feb-11-07  square dance: <<And I have certain problems in long tournaments like this one, because it is really difficult for me to play for a win with black.>But you didn't have such problems back in the 1990s...The reason why our World Champion had difficulties in playing for a win with black is that he CHOSE to make it difficult for himself with the drop of the Sicilian in his repertiore.> yes, kramnik CHOSE to play the petrov, which means that when his opponent opens with 1.e4 they're likely to split the point. great idea for match play, but he will have to "suffer" for it a bit in tournaments. well, he's been world champion for almost 7 years now so i would say its been worth it.

<<And most of his victories here were achieved because his opponents walked into some very strong novelties.>I also want to see what Kramnik means by these very strong novelties. According to the annotations of Topalov's victories in the many games he played in these 2 or so years, they were achieved in the middle-endgame phase and very seldom due to a strong opening novelty. Maybe Kramnik still had that game where he got crushed by Topalov in around 20 moves on the white side of the Najdorf in 2005 in mind?> this was my favorite part. topalov himself says that all of his opponents are walking right into cheparinov's preperation, but when kramnik makes some similar statement <alice> feels the need to go on some strange rant about games that took place two years ago when kramnik is clearly talking about corus 2007. i dont understand the point of that. i guess if you're trying to 'rub it in kramnik's face' with the comments about the corus 2005 game i would just reply with one word: elista.

<<But his play as a whole did not impress me.>....unfortunately, his "inimpressive" play scored more wins than you, Kramnik. :)> im not exactly sure what "inimpressive" means, but assuming it means something along the same lines as unimpressive then i would have to agree with kramnik to a certain extent. that is, i wasnt unimpressed, but less impressed than i have been with topalov's play in past tournaments. i do agree with topalov and kramnik that vesko's opponents seemed to be walking right into his prep in some games. i dont think this should diminish his achievement of sharing 1st place here, but from a point of view of quality i dont think this tournament was his best. i think most people would agree that. oh wait, they would until kramnik said it...

also, this other matter about the word "primitive". i believe both of those interviews were translated from russian so that should be taken into considertation. im not even sure if you were being serious about that though.

Feb-11-07  Archives: <<I let Navara escape. That half a point ended up being the difference in the standings. I could have beaten him.>...and Carlsen as well. If Kramnik had played Nd5 he would have a reasonable chance of winning that game.>

And if Topalov had not played 44...Rxc5?? in the final game of the Reunification match, he could be World Champion.

Feb-11-07  alicefujimori: <square dance><this was my favorite part. topalov himself says that all of his opponents are walking right into cheparinov's preperation, but when kramnik makes some similar statement <alice> feels the need to go on some strange rant about games that took place two years ago when kramnik is clearly talking about corus 2007. i dont understand the point of that. i guess if you're trying to 'rub it in kramnik's face' with the comments about the corus 2005 game i would just reply with one word: elista.>Obviously I was referring to that game with a tongue in cheek. :) This is not the first time I've been against this superficial statement that Topalov won most of his games due to his strong opening novelties. Actually, how many "strong novelties" were there that led to Topalov's victory in those games anyway?

The first one to deviate (play a novelty) according to chesslive.de in Topalov-Van Wely was Van Wely when he played 18...Na6.

In Topalov-Shirov, the first one to deviate (play a novelty) according to chesslive.de was actually Shirov with 25...Rd8 (Previously, 25...Rc8 was tried).

In Pono-Topalov, the first to deviate (play a novelty) was actually Pono and not Topalov's 11...h6 like chessbase had claimed in their report. Pono's 13.a4 was new, according to chesslive.de.

In Topalov-Anand, Topalov was indeed the one that came up with a novelty (19.b4), so that's one.

In Topalov-Carlsen, Carlsen was the first to deviate according to chessbase.

In Svidler-Topalov, Svidler was the first to deviate with 13.Bg5. Previously, only 13.h3 had been played according to chesslive.de. Not to mention that Topalov lost that game.

So as you can see, the only victory due to his opponent walking into his "strong novelty" here was in Topalov-Anand. You cannot possibly tell me that one means "most". What does this mean? This means all this talk about Topalov winning due to his strong opening novelties is crap. There's a difference between "preparations" and "strong opening novelties". Topalov might have won many of his games due to his better opening PREPARATIONS combined with his middlegame or (and) endgame play in the actual game (which successful GM doesn't do this anyway?), but it definitely was not due to many of his opponents walking into his very strong opening NOVELTIES like Kramnik had claimed.

<Archives><And if Topalov had not played 44...Rxc5?? in the final game of the Reunification match, he could be World Champion.>I was merely saying that Kramnik forgot to mention his game against Carlsen, in which he was also white and had very probably let Carlsen to escape when he did not play Nd5. So don't go around playing "if" games here. :)

Feb-11-07  shintaro go: Maybe the reason why Kramnik played so many Petroffs in Corus was to save his preparation against 1.e4 for Mexico. Of course this cannot be confirmed nor denied. One can only speculate. I won't be surprised to see Sveshnikovs from Kramnik.
Feb-11-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: Imagine if Kramnik unleashes something totally different against e4... something that we have not seen him play much before...
Feb-11-07  HoLySmOkE: Open Defence, what exactly should I imagine?
Feb-11-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: imagine Kramnik playing the Pirc!!
Feb-11-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <HoLySmOkE> Image there's no heaven, imagine there's no countries, image no posession...

Hey, that sounds pretty cool, someone should turn that into a song!!

Feb-11-07  Atking: <<alicefujimori:> I was merely saying that Kramnik forgot to mention his game against Carlsen, in which he was also white and had very probably let Carlsen to escape when he did not play Nd5.> I saw this game It seems to me that Carlsen defended very well. Where is "your" Nd5 ? And could you give us some analysis proving that Kramnik have an advantage with this move ?
Feb-11-07  Whitehat1963: An indication of the difficulty of beating Kramnik lies below in the winning and drawing percentages of some of the leading players over the last 10 years when playing the black pieces:

Adams +25% =58.6%
Anand +27.1% =61.6%
Aronian +30.1% =48.8%
Bacrot +26.7% =52.3%
Bareev +27.4% =47.2%
Dreev +26.8% =50.9%
Gelfand +23.7% =56.9%
Grischuk +23.1% =56.2%
Ivanchuk +25.2% =55.9%
Kamsky +29.4% =47.1%
Karpov +26.4% =49%
Kasimdzhanov +40.1% =41%
Kasparov +35.5% =52.5%
Kramnik +21% =62.3%
Khalifman +18.3% =65.2%
Leko +15.6% =67.3%
Mamedyarov +32.8% =48%
Milov +37.8% =38.4%
Morozevich +38.6 =37.2
Navara +37.6% =44.4%
Polgar +27.7% =40.7%
Radjabov +30.7% =49.1%
Shirov +28.1% =49.2%
Short +23.5% =52.5%
Svidler +22.4% =56.2%
Topalov +26.3% =46.5%
Van Wely +22.4% =44.2%
Zhang +38% =42.3%
Zvjaginsev +16.9% =68.1%

Some surprises here, such as Kasimdzhanov and Milov who seem to play quite well with black (though admittedly, this list does not filter out blind, blitz, rapid and simul games, etc., and does not account for the level of competition the players faced during this time). Interesting to note the difficulty in beating Kasparov was about the same as with beating Kramnik or Leko, but you were far less likely to draw with Kasparov as with the others! Topalov's percentages are probably not what one might have expected, but Morozevich's could be. It might be interesting to see how Topalov's percentages with black might have improved since about 2004. Radjabov is clearly comfortable playing black, as he has won often throughout his career, and his recent performance at Corus would also attest.

Feb-11-07  veigaman: Kramnik is stronger than topalov by far in my opinion because he has more chess resources: better defence, better endgame skills, better play under pressure, better repertoire.

Topalov is a great player no doubt but to be world chess champion you have to be better than your opponents in each stage of the game and kramnik is clearly much better than topalov even in rapids and blitz games.

Feb-11-07  Whitehat1963: Looking at the above list again, I notice just how difficult it is to beat Anand when he's playing black. Very rare for him to lose, even more rare than Kramnik.
Feb-11-07  veigaman: kramnik said once that he had more problems with anand and leko than with kasparov
Feb-11-07  percyblakeney: <I did not try especially hard in this competition. There was no big motivation. This is not the World Championship>

It's hard to imagine Kasparov saying something like that, for example after his loss against Radjabov...

Feb-11-07  square dance: <It's hard to imagine Kasparov saying something like that, for example after his loss against Radjabov...> im not sure thats a good example since kramnik isnt 'making an excuse' for losing like kasparov would have been. kramnik is only 'making an excuse' for not winning more.
Feb-11-07  Akavall: <alice> Regarding "primitive", Topalov himself said:

"I didn't want to comlicated too much because I had in mind what happened [yesterday]."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMcI...

Feb-11-07  veigaman: I think kramnik wanted to say that corus format doesnt help him too much because it is a long single round tournament where all the players are very carefull when they play with him. In a tournament with that format, it is not a bad result if you draw with kramnik.

I was very critic of kramnik 2 or 3 years ago for his lack of fighting spirit in some games ( i didnt know of his health´problems) but i think it is fair to recognise that his opponents take a lot of precautions when play with him and they are co-responsable as well for accepting or offering draws.

Feb-12-07  percyblakeney: I suppose all players want to rationalise their "failures" in some way (not that +3 in Corus is a "failure"...), but I'm not sure that Kramnik takes tournaments as lightly as it can sound afterwards. Just before Corus he for example said that he <would try to prove in every tournament that he is the strongest player in the world>, as mentioned here:

http://www.chessninja.com/dailydirt...

Maybe he didn't beat Navara because he wasn't trying that hard, and maybe Navara just played well enough to draw him (as against Topalov and Anand). <For the most part, I can count on winning with white> is maybe a bit of an exaggeration (he has won a third of his white games counting from 2000), but Kramnik does seem to rely exclusively on his white games when it comes to winning nowadays. It will be interesting to see if this will change in Mexico.

Feb-12-07  Lt. Col. Majid: <veigaman: Kramnik is stronger than topalov by far in my opinion because he has more chess resources: better defence, better endgame skills, better play under pressure, better repertoire. Topalov is a great player no doubt but to be world chess champion you have to be better than your opponents in each stage of the game and kramnik is clearly much better than topalov even in rapids and blitz games.>

The above is so correct and the chess world has come to realise it.

Feb-12-07  alicefujimori: <Atking>The 23rd move. See: http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/eve...
Feb-12-07  Atking: <alicefujimori> Thank for the site but they say it's a draw 23.Nd5 Bc5 24.exd Nxd4 25.Bf4 then <25...Qb7! this is the way to draw with black after 23.Nd5 26.Bxb8 Rxd5 27.Bf4 Nf3+ 28.Kf1 Rd2 29.Bxd2 Nxh2+ 30.Kg1 Nf3 ).> All the line is quite complex White need a bit more for a win but it still looks draw. May I miss something ?
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 1600)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 930 OF 1600 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC