< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 19 OF 19 ·
|Jan-06-17|| ||Dionysius1: I don't agree <Dizzy Bishop>. All I find necessary for me to respect and admire an exponent of this great game is that he excel at it. His character away from the board is nothing to do with it.|
|Feb-06-17|| ||stoy: I believe that Garry Kasparov called Reuben Fine "one of the most underrated players in the history of chess".|
|Feb-06-17|| ||Howard: There was at least one other alleged reason why Fine turned down his invitation for the 1948 tournament--he suspected the three Soviets would probably collude to make sure that no outsider won the tournament.|
Yes, Fine was apparently jealous of Fischer. CL&R wrote back when his "book" on the 1972 match came out that "Fine's envy of Fischer" showed throughout the "book".
And for Fine to claim in it that it seemed "only fair" for him and Keres to be declared "co-champions of the world from 1946-48".....if that's not totally ludicrous, then I dunno what is.
|May-22-17|| ||zanzibar: There is no game of Fine's in the 2010 edition of the <Mammoth Book>.|
That's just not right!
|May-23-17|| ||Retireborn: <z> Which game(s) of Fine would you advocate for such a book?|
Fine vs Gruenfeld, 1936
is the only one that comes to mind. Perhaps he's something of a forgotten figure on this side of the pond, though.
|May-23-17|| ||zanzibar: <RB> (or is that <RR>?) - |
Fine--Dake (Detroit 1933) is a fine Fine too.
I think Fine was at one time on the path to becoming a leading contender for WCC, just before he retired.
Euwe thought highly enough of his play to include him in his <Meet the Masters> book. Maybe one of those.
In addition, Fine also wrote the "book" (take your pick - Opening, Middle Game, or Endgame).
|May-23-17|| ||Retireborn: Either will do, maybe just <r> as well :)|
I have 68 Fine games in my collection, of which he won 39 - the wins against Lasker, Alekhine, Euwe and Botvinnik are certainly impressive - but I suppose books like the Mammoth book are aiming for spectacular messy games, on the whole.
|May-23-17|| ||Retireborn: Just looked again at Fine-Dake (it's the oldest Fine game I have) and with 32.Nxf6!! it certainly qualifies.|
|May-23-17|| ||zanzibar: Here's Euwe's choices (Fine served as a 2nd to Euwe during one of his WCC matches - btw):|
<Keen and efficient play is required, in a case like this, to make the abstract advantage turn thd scale
against the concrete. Fine succeeds convincingly.>
1. Keres vs Fine, 1936
<Fine provides a magnificent specimen of positional
play in the following game, which differs from the last
in that it is his opponent who first seizes the initiative.
The way in which Fine not only parries but punishes
these attempts, gains the upper hand, and eventually
consolidates the win is indeed memorable.>
2. Fine vs Alekhine, 1937
<Now follows a game which illustrates above all
Fine's combinative intrepidity.>
3. W Winter vs Fine, 1936
<Fine excels in defence. He is almost unbeatable
when he gets into his stride. He has gone through
many tournaments, among them the exceptionally strong tournaments at Nottingham in 1936 and
Semmering-Baden in 1937, without losing a game.>
4. Botvinnik vs Fine, 1936
|May-24-17|| ||Retireborn: <z> Thanks - the Keres and Winter games are new to me.|
|Nov-27-17|| ||Jonathan Sarfati: Here is a TV interview with Fine from 1980, subtitled in Spanish. He had a strong NY accent:|
|Dec-20-17|| ||zanzibar: Doll (kibitz #1476)|
|Mar-02-18|| ||CountryGirl: Fine sure had some killer results - eg scored 79% using the NimzoIndian. Pity his competition at home was so weak - I wonder how he would have fared as a Soviet?|
|Mar-02-18|| ||ChessHigherCat: <I wonder how he would have fared as a Soviet?>|
As a Soviet, he would have been Fine.
|Mar-14-18|| ||madlydeeply: i read a Fine book wherein he referred to soviet players as using "harem scarem" tactics.|
|Mar-14-18|| ||TheFocus: <madlydeeply: i read a Fine book wherein he referred to soviet players as using "harem scarem" tactics.>|
Must have been an Elvis fan.
|Mar-15-18|| ||offramp: <zanzibar: There is no game of Fine's in the 2010 edition of the <Mammoth Book>.
That's just not right!>
Perhaps the editors thought, "There is no Reuben Fine game - it takes too much time to find a game by him which one can enjoy."
|May-31-18|| ||takchess: http://tartajubow.blogspot.com/2018...|
|May-31-18|| ||sudoplatov: We do have an estimate of how well Fine would have done in the USSR. |
Leningrad 1937 won by Fine.
Moscow 1937 won by Fine.
Neither in the database.
|May-31-18|| ||Retireborn: Fine did play in Moscow in 1946 (as part of the US team) and his observations of Botvinnik etc then may have played a part in his 1948 decision, perhaps.|
|Jun-01-18|| ||Granny O Doul: That footage linked by Jonathan Sarfati above is from "the Great Chess Movie", which is watchable on youtube and without the subtitles, at least at this moment.|
|Jul-13-18|| ||Sally Simpson: Horowitz was giving a simultaneous display in Portland. |
Ruben Fine adopted a disguise and took a board. (Chess Review 1942)
|Jul-13-18|| ||JimNorCal: Sally, that is a cool photo! I'd never heard of this stunt before, what a great joke.|
|Jul-13-18|| ||HeMateMe: He looks like father guido sarducci.|
|Nov-15-18|| ||anjumskhan: His plus scores against all greats is enough for him to earn my respect.|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 19 OF 19 ·