chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Viswanathan Anand
Anand 
Photo copyright © 2009 Milan Kovacs (www.milankovacs.com)  

Number of games in database: 4,065
Years covered: 1984 to 2025
Last FIDE rating: 2743 (2727 rapid, 2732 blitz)
Highest rating achieved in database: 2817
Overall record: +664 -244 =1134 (60.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 2023 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (654) 
    B90 B33 B30 B31 B80
 Ruy Lopez (491) 
    C65 C67 C78 C84 C89
 Ruy Lopez, Closed (176) 
    C84 C89 C92 C95 C96
 Sicilian Najdorf (165) 
    B90 B92 B93 B96 B91
 French Defense (162) 
    C11 C10 C18 C19 C02
 Caro-Kann (117) 
    B12 B18 B17 B13 B14
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (285) 
    B90 B92 B48 B47 B32
 Ruy Lopez (209) 
    C65 C78 C67 C80 C84
 Queen's Indian (118) 
    E15 E12 E17 E19 E14
 Semi-Slav (111) 
    D45 D47 D43 D44 D46
 Queen's Gambit Declined (103) 
    D37 D38 D39 D30 D35
 Nimzo Indian (101) 
    E34 E21 E32 E20 E46
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Anand vs Lautier, 1997 1-0
   Karjakin vs Anand, 2006 0-1
   Aronian vs Anand, 2013 0-1
   Anand vs Topalov, 2005 1/2-1/2
   Anand vs Karpov, 1996 1-0
   Kramnik vs Anand, 2008 0-1
   Anand vs Bologan, 2003 1-0
   Kramnik vs Anand, 2008 0-1
   Anand vs Kasparov, 1995 1-0
   Anand vs Topalov, 2010 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Kasparov - Anand PCA World Championship Match (1995)
   Karpov - Anand FIDE World Championship Match (1998)
   FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2000)
   FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005)
   World Championship Tournament (2007)
   Anand - Kramnik World Championship Match (2008)
   Anand - Topalov World Championship Match (2010)
   Anand - Gelfand World Championship Match (2012)
   Anand - Carlsen World Championship Match (2013)
   Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   World Junior Championship (1987)
   Indian Championship (1988)
   Corsica Masters (2004)
   Eurotel Trophy KO (2002)
   Corsica Masters (2011)
   Coimbatore (1987)
   Groningen Candidates (1997)
   Hoogovens Group A (1999)
   Corsica Masters (2005)
   Manila Interzonal (1990)
   Levitov Chess Week (2019)
   Calcutta (1986)
   World Junior Championship (1985)
   Thessaloniki Olympiad (1984)
   Dubai Olympiad (1986)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Anand Grand Isa by fredthebear
   Match Anand! by chessgain
   Match Anand! by amadeus
   Admirable Anand! by chocobonbon
   Deary to the Gods by Gottschalk
   Power Chess - Anand by Anatoly21
   anand's ruylopez as white by Mrbotvinnik
   anand's ruylopez as white by nakul1964
   anand's ruylopez as white by webbing1947
   anand's ruylopez as white by senankit
   Anand's immortal by senankit
   admirable anand by senankit
   anand's ruylopez with black by senankit
   anand's ruylopez with black by Mrbotvinnik

GAMES ANNOTATED BY ANAND: [what is this?]
   Nijboer vs Anand, 1998

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 38th Leon GM
   Anand vs F Oro (Jul-04-25) 1/2-1/2, rapid
   F Oro vs Anand (Jul-04-25) 1/2-1/2, rapid
   F Oro vs Anand (Jul-04-25) 1/2-1/2, rapid
   Anand vs F Oro (Jul-04-25) 1/2-1/2, rapid
   F Oro vs Anand (Jul-04-25) 0-1, blitz

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Viswanathan Anand
Search Google for Viswanathan Anand
FIDE player card for Viswanathan Anand

VISWANATHAN ANAND
(born Dec-11-1969, 55 years old) India

[what is this?]

Vishwanathan Anand ("Vishy" to his fans) was the 15th undisputed World Champion, reigning from 2007 until 2013. He was also FIDE World Champion from 2000-2002. Anand was born in 1969 in Mayiladuthurai, a small town in southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, but grew up in Chennai. When he was six, his mother taught him to play chess.

Trailblazer

As an Indian and an Asian chess player, Anand blazed a trail with a number of firsts, including in 1984 becoming the youngest Indian to earn the title of IM (aged 14), becoming the youngest ever Indian Champion at 16, becoming in 1987 the first Indian to win the World Junior Championship and India's first grandmaster, and becoming India's (and Asia's) first World Champion. He was also the first World Champion since Robert James Fischer and the second since Max Euwe who did not originate from Russia or eastern Europe. Anand was, moreover, the first and only player to have won the putative world championship via knockout tournament, round robin tournament and traditional match play.

Championships

<Youth and Junior>: Anand's first serious impact in Indian chess was as a 14 year old, winning the 1983-84 National Sub-Junior Championship with a perfect score of 9/9. From 1983 until 1986, he was the National Junior (under 19) Champion and in 1984 and again in 1985 he won Lloyd's Bank Junior championship. Also in 1984 and again in 1985, Anand won the Asian Junior (under 19) Championships, the youngest to achieve this distinction. Anand capped his junior career by winning the 1987 World Junior Chess Championship.

<National>: Anand won the Indian National Championships in 1986, 1987 and 1988.

<Continental>: In 1986, Anand won the Arab-Asian International Chess Championship. In 1989, he won the 2nd Asian Active Chess Championship held in Hong Kong. In 1990 he won the Asian Open Chess Championship in Manila.

<World>: Anand's first tilt at the World Championship cycle took place during the last of the traditional FIDE cycles that had been established after World War II, albeit a cycle cut short at the final by Kasparov's split from FIDE in 1993. Anand kicked off his world championship campaign when he won the gold medal at the 1990 Asian Zonal Championship, qualifying for the Manila Interzonal later that year. He came third at that Interzonal, half a point behind co-leaders Vasyl Ivanchuk and Boris Gelfand, thereby qualifying for the Candidates Matches. In 1991, he defeated Aleksey Dreev in Chennai in the first round of Candidates matches, but lost to Anatoly Karpov in Brussels in the quarter finals.

In 1993, Anand came =1st with Michael Adams at the PCA Interzonal tournament in Groningen, the strongest Swiss tournament played until that time. Also in 1993, he contested the Biel FIDE Interzonal Tournament, coming 10th in a tightly fought contest, thereby qualifying for the FIDE Candidates cycle. In the PCA Candidates, Anand defeated Oleg Romanishin 5-2 in a best of eight match held in New York in 1994, then followed up shortly afterwards with a 5.5-1.5 demolition of Adams at Linares in the Candidates semi-final. In Las Palmas in 1995, he defeated Gata Kamsky in the final for the right to meet Garry Kasparov. In 1995, Anand met Kasparov at the World Trade Center in New York to play the match. After an opening run of eight draws, Anand won game nine but lost four of the next five to eventually concede the match 10½–7½. Conversely, in the concurrent FIDE cycle, Anand lost his quarter-final match to Kamsky, who went on to lose the 1996 FIDE championship match against Karpov. In 1997, Anand won the knock-out matches at Groningen for an opportunity to challenge FIDE World Champion Karpov, defeating Predrag Nikolic 2-0, Alexander Khalifman 3.5-2.5 (in the rapid and blitz tiebreak), Zoltan Almasi 2-0, Alexey Shirov 1.5-0.5, Boris Gelfand 1.5-0.5, and Adams 5-4 in a hard fought sudden death tiebreaker. In the 1998 FIDE cycle, FIDE controversially seeded the reigning champion Karpov directly into the final against the winner of the seven-round single elimination Candidates tournament. Despite coming through an extremely arduous campaign of 31 games in 30 days, Anand was able to draw the regular match 3-3, forcing a rapid playoff. However, the rapid playoff was won 2-0 by Karpov, allowing him to defend his FIDE championship.

In 2000, Anand beat Alexey Shirov 3½–½ in the final match of the FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2000) in Teheran to become the FIDE World Chess Champion, after defeating Victor Bologan, Smbat Lputian, Bartlomiej Macieja, Khalifman, and Adams in the preliminary rounds. He failed to defend the title in 2002, losing in the semifinals to Ivanchuk after defeating Olivier Touzane, Peter Heine Nielsen, Vladislav Tkachiev, Dreev, and Shirov in the earlier rounds. Anand did not compete in the FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004), but tied for second with Peter Svidler in the FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005) at San Luis in Mexico with 8½ points out of 14 games, 1½ points behind the winner, Veselin Topalov.

On the basis of his results at San Luis, Anand was seeded directly into the double round-robin World Championship Tournament (2007) in Mexico City, which he won with a score of 9/14 points, a full point ahead of joint second place finishers, Vladimir Kramnik and Boris Gelfand, thereby succeeding Kramnik as the title holder of the unified World Championship. Kramnik had taken the non-FIDE world championship title from Kasparov in the Kasparov - Kramnik Classical World Championship Match (2000), so this victory made Anand the undisputed world champion for the first time. In Bonn in October 2008, Anand again bested Kramnik for the championship, this time in a traditional one-on-one match, scoring 6.5-4.5 (+3 -1 =7) in the Anand - Kramnik World Championship Match (2008).

The following year, Anand successfully defended his title in the Anand - Topalov World Championship Match (2010) by 6.5-5.5 after winning the 12th and final classical game scheduled for the match. In May 2012, he faced the winner of the World Championship Candidates (2011), Boris Gelfand, to again successfully defend his title, winning the Anand - Gelfand World Championship Match (2012) 2.5-1.5 (+1 =3) in the rapid game tiebreaker after drawing the classical games 6-6 (+1 -1 =10).

As a result of Magnus Carlsen winning the World Championship Candidates (2013), the Anand - Carlsen World Championship Match (2013) was played in November 2013. The first four games were drawn before Carlsen won the fifth and sixth games. The seventh and eighth games were drawn, with Carlsen then winning the ninth game and drawing the tenth and last game to win the crown from Anand, producing a final score of 6.5-3.5 (+3 =7) in Carlsen's favor.

Rematch with Carlsen 2014

Anand's loss in the 2013 World Championship match with Carlsen did, however, qualify him to play in the World Championship Candidates (2014), which he won with a round to spare. He therefore won the right to challenge Carlsen in a rematch, the Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014), which commenced on 8 November 2014 in Sochi, in Russia and finished on 23 November.

The first game of the match was a fighting draw, with Anand playing a queen pawn's opening and Carlsen successfully defending a Grunfeld. Carlsen drew first blood in game two, playing the White side of a quiet Ruy Lopez. After the first rest day, Anand struck back strongly, playing the White side of a Queen's Gambit Declined (D37), and overcame Carlsen before the first time control. In game 4, Anand played the Sicilian, but Carlsen steered the opening into a quiet positional struggle that ended in a draw. Game 5 was a Queen's Indian Defence which also ended in a draw. Game 6 may have been the turning point in the match. Playing Black, Anand missed a simple tactical stroke that would have given him a very strong, if not winning position. After missing this continuation, Anand's game weakened and Carlsen brought home the point to take the lead in the match for the second time.

Anand defended Game 7 with another Berlin Defence but eventually encountered difficulties and surrendered a piece for two pawns. However, his defence kept Carlsen at bay for 122 moves before the game was finally drawn due to insufficient mating material on the board. Game 8 in the match was another QGD, with Anand playing White. Carlsen introduced an innovation from his home preparation that guaranteed him a relatively easy draw, forcing a mass exchange of pieces that left the position easily drawn. After the fourth rest day, play resumed with Anand employing a Berlin Defence to Carlsen's Ruy Lopez. The game soon finished through a draw by repetition, with Carlsen content to maintain his one-point lead. In Game 10, Anand again faced Carlsen defending a Grunfeld, albeit not as convincingly as in Game 1. Anand had a long initiative but failed to secure the win, with Carlsen exhausting the opportunities against him to force the draw. Game 11 was another Berlin Defence by Anand which turned into a complex and hard fought middle game following an innovation by him on the queenside, which he followed up with an exchange sacrifice. Anand was unable to make sufficient inroads into Carlsen's position, and after a series of trades that increased Carlsen's material advantage, Anand resigned the game and the match.

Match result: Anand lost by 4.5-6.5 (+1 -3 =7).

World Championship Cycle 2016

As the loser of his world title challenge to Carlsen in 2014, Anand automatically qualified for the Candidates Tournament of 2016.

Tournaments

Anand is the only player to have won the super tournament at Wijk aan Zee (Corus from 1989-2010) five times. He is the first player to have achieved victories in each of the three big chess supertournaments: Corus/Wijk aan Zee (1989, 1998, 2003, 2004, 2006), Linares (1998, 2007, 2008), Dortmund (1996, 2000, 2004).

One of Anand's earliest serious successes in international tournaments that brought him to international attention include his tie for first place in the Sakthi Finance International Grandmasters Chess Tournament in 1987, enabling him to win his third GM norm, and thereby becoming the youngest Grandmaster in the world at that time. In 1989, he competed in the 4th International Games Festival in France, placing second overall in the Veterans vs. Youth Tournament, although he was first in the Youth category. During that event, Anand defeated former World Champions, Mikhail Tal and Boris Spassky in their individual encounters. In 1990, he won the 1990 Manchester Chess Festival and was =1st in the 1990 Triveni Super Grandmasters Tournament in Delhi. In 1992, Anand finished first in the category 18 Reggio Emilia Chess Tournament ahead of Kasparov and Karpov in the strongest tournament ever held until this time. Also in 1992, he won the Goodrich Open International Tournament in Kolkata and won the category 18 Alekhine Memorial tournament in Moscow ahead of Karpov. This raised Anand's rating to 2700, making him only the eighth person to attain the mark at that time. In 1994, he won the PCA Grand Prix in Moscow ahead of Kasparov

Major successes followed rapidly in 1996, when he finished 2nd at the Las Palmas super tournament and at the Magistral Tournament in Leon. There followed, in 1997, wins in the category 19 tournament in Dos Hermanes, the Invesbanka Chess tournament in Belgrade, the Credit Suisse Classic Tournament in Biel, and 2nd place in Dortmund. In 1998 he won the category 21 (average 2752) Linares tournament, as well as at Madrid and at the Fontys-Tilburg International Chess Tournament. In 1999, he won again at Wijk aan Zee. In 2000, he was runner up at Linares, won at Leon (beating Shirov 1½:½) and at Dortmund and also at the 2000 FIDE World Cup in Shenyeng, defeating Evgeny Bareev 1.5 - 0.5 in the final to win. He successfully defended his World Cup title in 2002 in Hyderabad. In 2001, Anand finished 1st in the 2nd Torneo Magistral Tournament in Mexico City, a clear point ahead Nigel Short, Khalifman and Hernandez. In 2002, he won the Eurotel World Chess Trophy in Prague, defeating Jan Timman (2-0), Khalifman (2-0), Sokolov (1.5-0.5), Ivanchuk (2.5-1.5) and Karpov (1.5-0.5) in the final. He won Corus in 2003 and 2004, and took out Dortmund in 2004. In spring of 2006, following a record-extending fifth victory at Corus Group A (2006), Anand became only the fourth player ever to crack the 2800-Elo mark in FIDE ratings, following Kasparov, Vladimir Kramnik, and Veselin Topalov. A few months after he won the World Championship in 2007, he won the (category 21) Morelia-Linares (2008) outright with 8.5 points, winning at Linares for the third time in his career. Following mediocre (for Anand) results in 2012 which saw him slip out of the top 5 for the first time in nearly 20 years, Anand scored 8/13 to place =3rd behind Carlsen and Aronian at the category 20 Tata Steel Group A (2013) event, and defeated Aronian in round 4 in a game that is becoming known as Anand's Immortal.*

2013 saw Anand breaking his tournament drought by winning outright at the category 19 GRENKE Chess Classic (2013) with 6.5/10, winning in the last round to head off Fabiano Caruana by half a point at the pass. This was his first tournament win since Linares in 2008. A few weeks later he placed 2nd behind Caruana at the Category 21 Zurich Chess Challenge (2013) with 3/6 (+1 -1 =4), losing one game to Caruana and defeating Kramnik in his sole win. In April-May 2013, Anand placed outright 3rd at the category 20 Alekhine Memorial (2013), a half point behind Levon Aronian and Gelfand, with 5/9 (+2 -1 =6), a par for rating performance. Soon afterwards he played in the category 21 Norway Chess (2013), scoring 5/9, another par for rating effort. His next tournament was the category 22 Tal Memorial (2013) in June 2013 was one of his worst results in many years, finishing near the bottom of the field with 3.5/9 (+1 -3 =5), also causing him to shed 11 rating points and four places in his world ranking.

After he lost his title defense to Carlsen, Anand next's tournament was the category 23 Zurich Chess Challenge (2014) in which he placed 4th with a scored of 2/5. In the lead up to the return match against Carlsen in November 2014, Anand placed a decisive 1st at the category 21 Bilbao Masters (2014), winning with a round to spare in the six game round robin event. Soon after his unsuccessful attempt to regain the crown from Carlsen in November 2014, Anand won the category 22 London Chess Classic (2014) in December 2014 ahead of Kramnik, Giri, Nakamura, Adams and Caruana. A few months later he racked up another major league triumph when he won standard section of the category 22 RR Zurich Chess Challenge (2015) ahead of outright runner-up, Hikaru Nakamura and the supporting cast of Kramnik, Sergey Karjakin, Aronian and Caruana respectively. He was unable to maintain the lead in the follow-up section of the event, the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2015), and tied with Nakamura for first place. However, he lost an Armageddon tiebreaker to finish with second prize. Anand continued his strong form at the category 21 Gashimov Memorial (2015) held in April 2015, placing outright second with 6/9 (+3 =6), a point behind the winner Carlsen, and a point ahead of joint third place getters Wesley So and Fabiano Caruana. Two months later, he again displayed his excellent form, finishing an undefeated 2nd behind a resurgent Topalov at the category 22 Norway Chess (2015) event in Stavanger, with 6/9 (+3 =6; TPR 2899) and defeating Carlsen in their individual game.

Olympiads

Anand played board 4 for India in 1984, and top board in 1986, 1988, 1990, 1992, 2004 and 2006, winning a silver medal on top board in 2004.

Matches

In 1992, Anand defeated the then number 3 Vassily Ivanchuk by 5:3 in a match held in Linares. In 1997, he played an exhibition simul against 6 computers at the Aegon Man Vs Computers chess event, winning 4-2. In 1998 at the Siemens Nixdorf Duell (Rapid) event in Frankfurt, he beat the then world open category computer chess champion Fritz 5 (1.5-0.5). In 1999 at the Torneo Magistral de Ajedrez in Leon, he beat Karpov 5:1. He won the 2001 "Duel of the Champions", defeating Kramnik in a rapid game match 6.5-5.5 and in 2009, he defeated Leko 5-3 in the Leko - Anand Rapid Match (2009).

Teams

In 1986, he won a team silver medal and a an individual gold medal for board four in the Asian Team Championship. He scored 7/7 in the 1989 Asian Team Chess Championship thereby helping his team to a team bronze as well as winning the top board prize as well as the individual best performance of the tournament. He has played in the Bundesliga, the French and Hungarian Team Championships and the European Club Cup. In 2009, he lead the Rest of the World from board 1 to a decisive 21.5-10.5 victory in the Azerbaijan vs the World (2009) event. He played top board for Baden-Baden in a couple of rounds, helping his team to win the 2013-14 Bundesliga.

Rapids

Anand has always been renowned for the speed of his calculation and moves. His early classical games were often played at close to blitz speed and this prowess has stood him in good stead to enable him to become perhaps the greatest blitz and rapid player of all time. His prowess at quick-play chess has earned him the nickname "The Lightning Kid."

The Chess Classic at Mainz, essentially the annual open world rapid championship, that had commenced in 1994 and finished up in 2010 had become Anand's personal property as he won it 11 times out of the 17 times it had been staged, including nine consecutive wins from 2000 through to 2008. In addition, he has won the annual overall Amber Blindfold and Rapid Chess Championships in 1994, 1997, 2003, 2005 and 2006, the Amber Rapid 7 times, and he was the only player to win the blind and rapid sections of the Amber tournament in the same year (twice: in 1997 and 2005). Other significant sequences were the six consecutive wins at Corsica from 1999 through 2005, and seven wins at Leon in 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, Ciudad de Leon XVIII (2005), XIX Ciudad de Leon (2006), and 2007. Other victories include 1st place at the 1996 Credit Swiss Rapid Chess Grand Prix, in Geneva, where he beat Garry Kasparov in the final, 1st in Wydra in Haifa in 1999 and 2000, 1st in the 2000 Plus GSM World Blitz Chess Cup in Warsaw where he won outright with 17.5 Points in 22 Games, defeating Karpov, Gelfand and Svidler, 1st in the 2000 Fujitsu Siemens Giants Chess (Rapid) in Frankfurt, winning the 2006 Mikhail Tal Memorial Blitz Tournament in Moscow with 23/34, which involved winning 11 out of 17 mini-matches to claim the strongest Blitz tournament in the history of the game, beating his eventual successor to the rapid crown, Aronian, by a 2 point margin. He is also the 2003 FIDE World Rapid Chess Champion by virtue of winning the Cap D'Agde FRA (2003). On 27 March 2011 in Tashkent in Uzbekistan, Anand defeated Rustam Kasimdzhanov in a rapid play match by 3.5-0.5 and in September 2011, he won the Botvinnik Memorial Rapid (2011) ahead of Aronian, Kramnik and Carlsen with 4.5/6 (+3 =3 -0). In In June 2011, he won the rapid XXIV Magistral de Ajedrez Ciudad de Leon (2011) 4.5-1.5 (+3 -0 =3) and in October 2011, he defeated Shakhriyar Mamedyarov by 2-0 in the final to win the Corsica Masters (2011).

Anand competed in the rejigged London Classic of 2013, and qualified for the final rounds by placing =1st in the London Chess Classic (Group A) (2013), but then lost to Kramnik in the London Chess Classic (Knockout) (2013). He placed =2nd in the World Rapid Championship (2014) with 10.5/15, half a point behind the winner, Carlsen, whom he defeated in their individual encounter, and scored 13.5/21 (placing =5th) in the World Blitz Championship (2014). He came =3rd with 8/10 at the London Chess Classic 2014 Super Rapidplay Open. Anand became the World Rapid Champion when he won the World Rapid Championship (2017) following a two-game blitz playoff for first with young Russian Grandmaster Vladimir Fedoseev.

Awards

Anand has won the Chess Oscar on 6 occasions, in 1997, 1998, 2003, 2004, 2007, and 2008. He has received many other national and international awards including the Arjuna award for Outstanding Indian Sportsman in Chess in 1985, the inaugural Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award, India's highest sporting honour in the year 1991–1992, the British Chess Federation's 'Book of the Year' Award in 1998 for his book My Best Games of Chess, the Padma Bhushan in 2000, the Sportstar Millennium Award in 1998 from India's premier Sports magazine for being the sportperson of the millennium. In 2007, he was awarded India's second highest civilian award, the Padma Vibhushan, making him the first sportsperson to receive the award in Indian history and received the 'Global Strategist Award' for mastering many formats of World Chess Championships by National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM) in 2011.

Personal

Anand holds a Bachelor's degree in Commerce from Loyola College in Chennai, India. Previously, he attended High School at Don Bosco. He is married to Aruna Anand and lives in Chennai along with his son Akhil Anand. In August 2010, Anand joined the Board of Directors of Olympic Gold Quest, a foundation for promoting and supporting India's elite sportspersons and potential young talent. In 2010 Anand donated his World Championship gold medal from his successful 2008 title defense to the charitable organisation "The Foundation" to be auctioned off for the benefit of underprivileged children.

Rating and Ranking

Anand is one of eight players in history to officially crack the 2800 mark, peaking at 2817 in March and May 2011, when he was also ranked world #1. Between April 2007 and May 2011, Anand was ranked world #1 for a total of 21 months.

At the age of 45 and after placing 2nd at the Gashimov Memorial Tournament in Shamkir, Anand re-entered the "2800 club" for the first time since exiting that rating bracket in November 2011. His result at the Norway Chess tournament in June 2015 pushed his rating back up to 2816, close to his peak rating to date, and to #2 in the world behind Carlsen.

As of November 5, 2023, Anand's live rating is 2748, No. 10 in the world. At age 53 (54 next month), he is 18 years older than Hikaru Nakamura, the second oldest top-10 player.

Sources and references

Live rating: http://www.2700chess.com/; Biography of Anand at the official FIDE website for the 2012 World Championship match: http://moscow2012.fide.com/en/prese...; Wikipedia article: Viswanathan Anand; * Aronian vs Anand, 2013

Last updated: 2023-11-05 21:14:23

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 163; games 1-25 of 4,065  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. V Perera vs Anand 1-0601984Asia-ch U20 8thC70 Ruy Lopez
2. Anand vs M Apicella 1-0251984World Championship (U16)B76 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
3. F Hellers vs Anand  0-1421984World Championship (U16)B81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
4. Anand vs M Matlak  ½-½321984World Junior ChampionshipC05 French, Tarrasch
5. J Piket vs Anand 0-1441984World Junior ChampionshipA48 King's Indian
6. Anand vs I B de Souza 1-0211984World Junior ChampionshipB82 Sicilian, Scheveningen
7. Anand vs C Hansen ½-½191984World Junior ChampionshipB05 Alekhine's Defense, Modern
8. S Saeed vs Anand  1-0341984World Junior ChampionshipE69 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Classical Main line
9. Anand vs L Sandstrom  0-1361984World Junior ChampionshipB62 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer
10. G Rechlis vs Anand 0-1321984World Junior ChampionshipE63 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Panno Variation
11. Anand vs P Wolff 0-1221984World Junior ChampionshipB09 Pirc, Austrian Attack
12. L Galego vs Anand  0-1431984World Junior ChampionshipB30 Sicilian
13. H Korhonen vs Anand  0-1301984World Junior ChampionshipB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
14. Anand vs P K Wells  1-0361984World Junior ChampionshipB15 Caro-Kann
15. Anand vs Dreev  ½-½421984World Junior ChampionshipC05 French, Tarrasch
16. K Georgiev vs Anand 1-0351984World Junior ChampionshipE63 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Panno Variation
17. Chandler vs Anand  1-03819848th Lloyds Bank Masters OpenB62 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer
18. Anand vs P K Wells  ½-½2319848th Lloyds Bank Masters OpenB17 Caro-Kann, Steinitz Variation
19. Anand vs A Greenfeld 1-08019848th Lloyds Bank Masters OpenB43 Sicilian, Kan, 5.Nc3
20. Enoch Barumba vs Anand  0-1411984Thessaloniki OlympiadE91 King's Indian
21. Anand vs T Lirindzakis ½-½311984Thessaloniki OlympiadC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
22. Van der Wiel vs Anand 1-0271984Thessaloniki OlympiadB42 Sicilian, Kan
23. Anand vs D Hergott 1-0381984Thessaloniki OlympiadB33 Sicilian
24. Anand vs J Ochoa  0-1401984Thessaloniki OlympiadB33 Sicilian
25. P Ostermeyer vs Anand 0-1411984Thessaloniki OlympiadA15 English
 page 1 of 163; games 1-25 of 4,065  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Anand wins | Anand loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 410 OF 760 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-24-08  ivan999: anand has three classical wins against kasparov
Aug-24-08  visayanbraindoctor: <you vs yourself: It's pretty bad. +15-3 I think.>

Kasparov had a chess hex over Anand in the 1990s, which seemed to have disappeared in the 21st century. Anand simply played badly in most of his games with GKK. However, had GKK chosen not to semi-retire in 2002 to 2004 and to completely retire in 2005 (thus 'avoiding' more encounters with Anand), I think that Anand would have started beating him regularly. Anand has always struck me as more naturally gifted than GKK, but weaker in chess psyche.

IMO one of the main reasons why Kasparov retired was because he had noticed that his hex over top players like Anand, Topalov, and Leko was fast disappearing. If he had to play any of these players in a match on the way to a Title shot, he probably was not sure anymore if he would have won. A single match loss to any of these would have endangered his status as the greatest World Champion in chess history.

Anand seems to have outgrown his relatively weak chess psyche of the 1990s by now. Kramnik also never had a chess hex on Anand (unlike GKK) and so Anand should be in top form for their Bonn WC Match.

Aug-25-08  VaselineTopLove: What languages does Anand speak? I know he speaks English, Spanish, German and Tamil. I wanted to know if he speaks Russian and Hindi as well.
Aug-25-08  yalie: Kramnik's choice of the QGD Semi-Slav line against Gelfand was interesting. Looks like he wants to play some of Anand's pet lines.
Aug-28-08  anandrulez: Anand might be knowing a littl bit of Hindi for sure as many Indians fom south side . He might not b very fluent but defly can watch a bolly flick . As for Russian he migh know that as wll ...bu anyway I know that he knows ... languages which are Tamil( mother tongue)
English
Spanish
Geman
Dutch to some extent ...
Aug-28-08  maelith: @visayan it could be also that gazza is no longer the player that he once was, but prime for prime, i think gazza will always beat Anand
Aug-28-08  visayanbraindoctor: <maelith: @visayan it could be also that gazza is no longer the player that he once was, but prime for prime, i think gazza will always beat Anand>

The records clearly show that Kasparov dominated Anand when both were at their prime (Anand still is). I am not disputing that.

Humans however are not like computers. Any chessplayer who has played competitive chess would have 'experienced' certain opponents (sometimes weaker ones) that he feels uncomfortable with, and against whom he makes more errors than usual. A jinx or a chess hex.

GKK had it to a very strong degree over Anand. Anand IMO simply did not play at his prime, even when he was at his prime, against GKK. Anand simply played weakly against GKK, especially when he was younger.

You could contrast this to the way Kramnik played against GKK. He played his usual strong chess against GKK (even when he was only 18), so that GKK could not dominate him. On the other hand, Kramnik has never dominated Anand, who exhibited his usual high level of play whenever he met Kramnik, unlike when he met GKK.

Chess hex is what kept Anand from playing strongly against GKK. Had they played a match in 2004 or 2005, IMHO Anand would have beaten GKK. But that's just speculation; obviously this could never happen as Kasparov was playing infrequently then.

Personally, I am kind of disappointed that a 2004 or 2005 Kasparov vs Anand match never happened. By that time Anand seemed to have lost all his jinx against GKK, and would be truly playing in his prime.

(Had GKK and Anand declared that they would like to play a match, even if it were not a WC match, in the 21st century, surely many sponsors would have been interested in financing it. There was no barrier to such a thing; in fact, GKK even played what was in effect a non-WC mini-match of 4 games vs Kramnik in the Botvinnik Memorial in 2001. Certainly there is no legal barrier for two players to play a match if they wanted to.)

Aug-28-08  vanytchouck: Even if i prefer Anand to Kramnik (*) and even if Anand has shown a fantastic persistence at the top level in any format (wich is indeed quite amazing), i've to admit that i think that Kramnik make it a lot bigger than Anand in their career :

* Kramnik have a good score against the player often seen as the greatest ever (6-4 in classical). As it was already often said in these pages, in their overall score, Kasparov just went trough him. Almost easily.

* Kramnik was n°1 for the first time a 21 in 1996 when Kasparov was still at the top of his play whereas Anand became n°1 "only" after kasparov's retired on April 2007.

* Anand had been higher than 2800 for the very first time on April 2006 whereas Kramnik has already done it on July 2001!

* And of coure the biggest point :
Kramnik have beaten in a world championship match the man. Garry Kasparov. Ok, his path to the ogre of Baku was pettry controversial, but he's anyway done something that Karpov (5 attemps), Short, Korchnoi, and ... Anand have failed.

Not to mention that Anand had been crushed fairly badly in the 1995 world championship.

I highly appreciate Anand but i always have the bad impression that he could only be the "best" when the big boss has retired. He was even unable to get rid of Karpov in match ...

(*) But still, i'll be rooting for Kramnik in October. Complicated isn't it?

Aug-28-08  you vs yourself: <vantychouck> The correct classical score between Kramnik and Kasparov is +5-4. After that many games and uneven number of blacks and whites, there's hardly any difference between even score and +1.

As for Kramnik being #1, he was tied with Kasparov for 1 month. Again, out of 15 years in professional chess, what does it mean that a player is tied at #1 for one month?

Eventhough Anand never was #1 while Kasparov was playing, he had the higher rating performance than Kasparov throughout 2004 and maybe even 2003. Plus, Anand won 4 oscars while Kasparov was playing! Kramnik managed to do that only once.

Aug-28-08  KingG: <However, had GKK chosen not to semi-retire in 2002 to 2004 and to completely retire in 2005 (thus 'avoiding' more encounters with Anand), I think that Anand would have started beating him regularly.> I doubt anyone would have started beating Kasparov 'regularly' for quite a while, least of all Anand.
Aug-28-08  vanytchouck: <you vs yourself: <vantychouck> The correct classical score between Kramnik and Kasparov is +5-4. (...)>

Thanks for the correction, i may have confused with the classical score between Kramnik and Anand.

<(...)
After that many games and uneven number of blacks and whites, there's hardly any difference between even score and +1. (...)>

Of course it does !!! Specially if we look at the classical scores between Kasparov and any other players (i mean players that Kasparov has regularly met at the highest level).

<(...)As for Kramnik being #1, he was tied with Kasparov for 1 month. Again, out of 15 years in professional chess, what does it mean that a player is tied at #1 for one month? >

First were do you get that "one month" thing (i don't mean you're wrong, i would just like to know)? Kramnik was tied n°1 on the January list, wich means that according to all the results from - let's say July the 1st 1995 to December 31th 1995 - he was first with Kasparov.

Even if the "one month" thing is true, it still something that Anand, Ivanchuk, Gelfand, Kamsky etc were never able to do ...

And as there are only 6 "number 1" in the history of the rating list and only 2 player who manage to be "number 1" when Kasparov was professional, it's every thing but insignificant

<(...)
Eventhough Anand never was #1 while Kasparov was playing, he had the higher rating performance than Kasparov throughout 2004 and maybe even 2003. Plus, Anand won 4 oscars while Kasparov was playing! Kramnik managed to do that only once.>

Looking at achievement in competition, rating performances and most of all oscars have no relevant meaning :

The problem with the rating performance is that a 9,5/10 score against a 2700 elo rated opposition earns a better performance than a 5.5/10 score against a 2795 elo rated opposition. never forget the one of the best ever elo performance is hold by Zsofia Polgar after her 8,5/9 in the Rome open in 1989.

And theye are no that few, the players who managed to achieve a better elo performance than Kasparov

Chess Oscar? It's nothing but policy !
It's like brillancy prize, nicest player, better looking player, etc ...

I'm talking about achievement wich only depends on you, not on vote.

Oscar in sport, like the "ballon d'or" in football (soccer) are just irrelevant as prestigious tournaments, world ranking and world championship are far enough to reward the best players.

I always see them as only a way to make an event and to gain power by the journalists who create them. And sometimes it works very well as the "Chess Oscar" and the "Ballon d'or" are vey appreciated by the players...

Aug-28-08  vanytchouck: <King >

I highly agree with you as i once take a look at the classical score of Kasparov - Karpov on the basis of the Kasparov - Anand caracteristics :

As Kasparov retired at 42, i didn't count the Kasparov's wins over Karpov after 1993. As Kasparov had his firt win against Karpov at 22, i didn't count the Anand's losses wich occur before 1992.

Kasparov still have a + score against Karpov (from 1984 to 1993): +26 ; – 20 ; 121 =.

The Anand- Kasparov score didn't change.

Another way to compare the Anand -Kasparov score is to look at the Anand's score against the best player younger to Anand with a very close difference of age (a little bit more than 6 years) between him and Kasparov.

And this player is ... Kramnik !!!

And Kramnik didn't wait for the late forties of Anand to have a + score against him ...

Aug-28-08  you vs yourself: Here's the list of chess oscar winners: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_...

Winner's list reads like the names at the chess hall of fame. It's given to the player with the best results for that year. You can't win this by scoring 10/10 against 2400 opposition or by brilliantly winning one game. You win this by consistently performing at the highest level against the best players for the whole year.

As for why I mentioned rating performance, it's because Kasparov had such a huge lead in elo points that Anand had to perform at 2850 or 2900 level for several super tournaments to pass him during 2004. If they got a new rating at the start of every year, Anand would be #1 in 2004

Based on the results, it's hard to deny that Anand had a better year than Kasparov in 2004 and chessmetrics reflects this: http://db.chessmetrics.com/CM2/Mont...

Again, Kramnik was no where near his peak in '95 but he was tied with Kasparov for one FIDE rating list, who, along with Anand, at the time was busy preparing for the WC match. Compare to this to Kramnik being at his peak in 2000 and beating Kasparov in a match, yet never came close to Kasparov in the rating list. So how important of an achievement was being tied for #1 spot for one list? What did he win during '95 when he was tied for that spot? 'cause in the above chessmetrics link I posted, he just entered the top 5 and never broke into top 3 during that time period.

If we blindly follow FIDE ratings, one would conclude that Kramnik was near equal to Kasparov in '95. But if we use common sense, we'd realize that it was not the case and moreover, it won't be a stretch to say that Kramnik was perhaps slightly better than Kasparov in 2000 but the FIDE ratings won't show you that.

Aug-28-08  acirce: <Again, Kramnik was no where near his peak in '95 but he was tied with Kasparov for one FIDE rating list, who, along with Anand, at the time was busy preparing for the WC match.>

Not that it matters the slightest (I agree with your point anyway) but it was on the January 1996 list, after the WCh match. Kasparov had just lost a bunch of points in Horgen (played very soon after the match).

Aug-28-08  SetNoEscapeOn: <And as there are only 6 "number 1" in the history of the rating list and only 2 player who manage to be "number 1" when Kasparov was professional, it's every thing but insignificant>

Anand did surpass Kasparov in 2004 according to the chessmetrics ratings...

http://db.chessmetrics.com/CM2/Play...

And Kramnik never did. They are not official, of course, but it is unclear how the FIDE ratings are otherwise more "significant".

Aug-28-08  you vs yourself: <I'm talking about achievement wich only depends on you, not on vote.>

You or I can't get any votes for chess oscar because we achieved nothing. Svidler didn't win 1st place votes for chess oscar last year because he didn't achieve enough. Anand won the most votes for chess oscar last year because of his achievements. So, in the end, voting depends on achievements not the voters' personal preferences.

<The problem with the rating performance is that a 9,5/10 score against a 2700 elo rated opposition earns a better performance than a 5.5/10 score against a 2795 elo rated opposition. never forget the one of the best ever elo performance is hold by Zsofia Polgar after her 8,5/9 in the Rome open in 1989.>

In general, rating performance may not always give the complete picture. But that doesn't mean it's wrong all the time and it certainly wasn't in 2004 because Anand wasn't winning against 2500 players, he was winning super tournaments against the top players.

Aug-28-08  acirce: <What did he win during '95 ...>

Dortmund (outright), Horgen (shared with Ivanchuk), Belgrade (shared with Gelfand), all during the second half of the year.

Aug-28-08  you vs yourself: <acirce> Thanks! How many of those 3 had Kasparov, Karpov and Anand?
Aug-28-08  acirce: <you vs yourself> None had all of them. Dortmund had Karpov. Horgen had Kasparov. Perhaps I might add that they all had Ivanchuk (the then #3 on the rating list).

Judge for yourself how much it meant. No doubt Kramnik had a very good streak, but it doesn't mean he was as good as Kasparov.

Aug-28-08  you vs yourself: <acirce> I just wasn't sure which tournaments would come under the "super" category back then. It's pretty damn impressive to win one super tournament every year but it looks Kramnik won 2 of them in 6 months!
Aug-28-08  SetNoEscapeOn: <vantychouck>

<Looking at achievement in competition, rating performances and most of all oscars have no relevant meaning>

<you vs yourself> has already explained why the Chess Oscar is important.

What is a chess rating? It is merely a performance rating over a long time (the player's lifetime). A performance rating over an entire year is obviously very meaningful.

And of course you must look at the quality of opposition... But Anand never plays in 2nd tier events. And rapid chess, where his dominance is incredible, is not even rated.

Aug-28-08  yalie: http://news.google.com/news?q=anand...

interviews with commentators

Aug-28-08  yalie: The chess oscar has been the unofficial annual winner title. It commemorates who played the best chess in that calendar year.

This was needed because unlike in Tennis or Golf, a chess player could play as few as 4 games a year and continue to maintain a previously attained high rating (like trudyor on playchess). It was also needed at least until 2006 because there were multiple world champions.

And I cant really argue with any of the Chess Oscar awards. They have all been reasonable.

Aug-28-08  SetNoEscapeOn: <yalie>

Nobody wants to call this match one way or the other! One interesting point: there is a question addressed to all as

"The match between Kramnik and Anand is not only one of the most outstanding duels in chess history, but also a contest between <the two best> players of our time."

But then it comes to Michael Adams:

"To your mind, who will be the winner in one of the most important duels in the chess history – in a competition between the <two of the best> chess players of present time"

A coincidence, or consideration for Mickey?

Aug-28-08  vanytchouck: < you vs yourself: Here's the list of chess oscar winners: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_... Winner's list reads like the names at the chess hall of fame. It's given to the player with the best results for that year. You can't win this by scoring 10/10 against 2400 opposition or by brilliantly winning one game. You win this by consistently performing at the highest level against the best players for the whole year. (...)>

You can also have a prestigious list by picking each year randomly a name between the winner of Linares, Wijk Aan Zee, Dortmund and the MTel master.

I mean, of course there is great achievements before, but the last words are for journalists who vote.

It doesn't only depend of the player because it rather depends on if a journalist thinks that winning Wijk Aan Zee, Aerovist, Baku Grand Prix and let's say Bilbao is better than winning Linares and beating a Kramnik in decline.

It's a personnal choice of a player among great players.

< you vs yourself:
(...)
If they got a new rating at the start of every year, Anand would be #1 in 2004 (...)>

So what? If the rating was base on the alphabetical order, Anand would always be ahead of Kasparov, Karpov and Kramnik ...

< you vs yourself:
(...)
Again, Kramnik was no where near his peak in '95 but he was tied with Kasparov for one FIDE rating list (...)>

This is not relevant as "being at your peak" and "being n°1" are relatively linked , but are far from being something close :

It's because you can be n°1 (even world champion) and then being much more stronger but "only" n°4 because 3 even better players just have arrived.

Not to mention that the elo rating is mainly based on tournaments, while world championship is based on matches.

There are plenty of evidence of that phenomenon.
The 1990 Karpov (#2 and vice-world champion) was far stronger than the 1981 Karpov (#1 & world champion).

< you vs yourself:
(...)
[Kasparov] along with Anand, at the time was busy preparing for the WC match. (...)>

To see if something is a relevant cause, we have to check each time this situation occurs to verify that the same consequence also occurs pretty often (if not always).

Why wasn't Kasparov tied for the first place, after each defense of his world title?

Why didn't Anand (for instance) tie (even for once) Kasparov in the January 2001 list?

<(...)
Compare to this to Kramnik being at his peak in 2000 and beating Kasparov in a match, yet never came close to Kasparov in the rating list. So how important of an achievement was being tied for #1 spot for one list? What did he win during '95 when he was tied for that spot? 'cause in the above chessmetrics link I posted, he just entered the top 5 and never broke into top 3 during that time period. (...)>

Here again, being "world champion" is an achievement, and being "#1" is another. They are well linked, but are not the same thing.

What did Kramnik to be tied first in 1995? I just don't care. He was #1. End of the story. Is there a "proper" way to become #1?

And if it was that easy, why didn't Anand, Ivanchuk, Kamsky, Gelfand, Karpov, Shirov, etc make it too (even for only one list)?

This is just splitting hairs.

I don't care about what the elo really measure, but from 1970 to 2008 there is a fact indisputable fact :

In 38 years, only 6 guys have managed to get the #1.

If it was insignificant, there would be here and there many guys who would manage to get a "one listed #1".

<(...)
If we blindly follow FIDE ratings, one would conclude that Kramnik was near equal to Kasparov in '95. But if we use common sense, we'd realize that it was not the case and moreover, it won't be a stretch to say that Kramnik was perhaps slightly better than Kasparov in 2000 but the FIDE ratings won't show you that.>

Here again the same confusion between the rank and the strengh.

I'll repeat my answer.

You can be #1 in 1996 and #10 in 2000, even if you are far stronger in 2000.

Furthermore, you can be stronger in match than a player who is stronger than you in tournament.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 760)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 410 OF 760 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC