chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Viswanathan Anand
Anand 
Photo copyright © 2009 Milan Kovacs (www.milankovacs.com)  

Number of games in database: 4,065
Years covered: 1984 to 2025
Last FIDE rating: 2743 (2727 rapid, 2732 blitz)
Highest rating achieved in database: 2817
Overall record: +664 -244 =1134 (60.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 2023 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (654) 
    B90 B33 B30 B31 B80
 Ruy Lopez (491) 
    C65 C67 C78 C84 C89
 Ruy Lopez, Closed (176) 
    C84 C89 C92 C95 C96
 Sicilian Najdorf (165) 
    B90 B92 B93 B96 B91
 French Defense (162) 
    C11 C10 C18 C19 C02
 Caro-Kann (117) 
    B12 B18 B17 B13 B14
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (285) 
    B90 B92 B48 B47 B32
 Ruy Lopez (209) 
    C65 C78 C67 C80 C84
 Queen's Indian (118) 
    E15 E12 E17 E19 E14
 Semi-Slav (111) 
    D45 D47 D43 D44 D46
 Queen's Gambit Declined (103) 
    D37 D38 D39 D30 D35
 Nimzo Indian (101) 
    E34 E21 E32 E20 E46
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Anand vs Lautier, 1997 1-0
   Karjakin vs Anand, 2006 0-1
   Aronian vs Anand, 2013 0-1
   Anand vs Topalov, 2005 1/2-1/2
   Anand vs Karpov, 1996 1-0
   Kramnik vs Anand, 2008 0-1
   Anand vs Bologan, 2003 1-0
   Kramnik vs Anand, 2008 0-1
   Anand vs Kasparov, 1995 1-0
   Anand vs Topalov, 2010 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Kasparov - Anand PCA World Championship Match (1995)
   Karpov - Anand FIDE World Championship Match (1998)
   FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2000)
   FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005)
   World Championship Tournament (2007)
   Anand - Kramnik World Championship Match (2008)
   Anand - Topalov World Championship Match (2010)
   Anand - Gelfand World Championship Match (2012)
   Anand - Carlsen World Championship Match (2013)
   Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   World Junior Championship (1987)
   Indian Championship (1988)
   Corsica Masters (2004)
   Eurotel Trophy KO (2002)
   Corsica Masters (2011)
   Coimbatore (1987)
   Groningen Candidates (1997)
   Hoogovens Group A (1999)
   Corsica Masters (2005)
   Manila Interzonal (1990)
   Levitov Chess Week (2019)
   Calcutta (1986)
   World Junior Championship (1985)
   Thessaloniki Olympiad (1984)
   Dubai Olympiad (1986)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Anand Grand Isa by fredthebear
   Match Anand! by chessgain
   Match Anand! by amadeus
   Admirable Anand! by chocobonbon
   Deary to the Gods by Gottschalk
   Power Chess - Anand by Anatoly21
   anand's ruylopez as white by Mrbotvinnik
   anand's ruylopez as white by nakul1964
   anand's ruylopez as white by webbing1947
   anand's ruylopez as white by senankit
   Anand's immortal by senankit
   admirable anand by senankit
   anand's ruylopez with black by senankit
   anand's ruylopez with black by Mrbotvinnik

GAMES ANNOTATED BY ANAND: [what is this?]
   Nijboer vs Anand, 1998

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 38th Leon GM
   Anand vs F Oro (Jul-04-25) 1/2-1/2, rapid
   F Oro vs Anand (Jul-04-25) 1/2-1/2, rapid
   F Oro vs Anand (Jul-04-25) 1/2-1/2, rapid
   Anand vs F Oro (Jul-04-25) 1/2-1/2, rapid
   F Oro vs Anand (Jul-04-25) 0-1, blitz

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Viswanathan Anand
Search Google for Viswanathan Anand
FIDE player card for Viswanathan Anand

VISWANATHAN ANAND
(born Dec-11-1969, 55 years old) India

[what is this?]

Vishwanathan Anand ("Vishy" to his fans) was the 15th undisputed World Champion, reigning from 2007 until 2013. He was also FIDE World Champion from 2000-2002. Anand was born in 1969 in Mayiladuthurai, a small town in southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, but grew up in Chennai. When he was six, his mother taught him to play chess.

Trailblazer

As an Indian and an Asian chess player, Anand blazed a trail with a number of firsts, including in 1984 becoming the youngest Indian to earn the title of IM (aged 14), becoming the youngest ever Indian Champion at 16, becoming in 1987 the first Indian to win the World Junior Championship and India's first grandmaster, and becoming India's (and Asia's) first World Champion. He was also the first World Champion since Robert James Fischer and the second since Max Euwe who did not originate from Russia or eastern Europe. Anand was, moreover, the first and only player to have won the putative world championship via knockout tournament, round robin tournament and traditional match play.

Championships

<Youth and Junior>: Anand's first serious impact in Indian chess was as a 14 year old, winning the 1983-84 National Sub-Junior Championship with a perfect score of 9/9. From 1983 until 1986, he was the National Junior (under 19) Champion and in 1984 and again in 1985 he won Lloyd's Bank Junior championship. Also in 1984 and again in 1985, Anand won the Asian Junior (under 19) Championships, the youngest to achieve this distinction. Anand capped his junior career by winning the 1987 World Junior Chess Championship.

<National>: Anand won the Indian National Championships in 1986, 1987 and 1988.

<Continental>: In 1986, Anand won the Arab-Asian International Chess Championship. In 1989, he won the 2nd Asian Active Chess Championship held in Hong Kong. In 1990 he won the Asian Open Chess Championship in Manila.

<World>: Anand's first tilt at the World Championship cycle took place during the last of the traditional FIDE cycles that had been established after World War II, albeit a cycle cut short at the final by Kasparov's split from FIDE in 1993. Anand kicked off his world championship campaign when he won the gold medal at the 1990 Asian Zonal Championship, qualifying for the Manila Interzonal later that year. He came third at that Interzonal, half a point behind co-leaders Vasyl Ivanchuk and Boris Gelfand, thereby qualifying for the Candidates Matches. In 1991, he defeated Aleksey Dreev in Chennai in the first round of Candidates matches, but lost to Anatoly Karpov in Brussels in the quarter finals.

In 1993, Anand came =1st with Michael Adams at the PCA Interzonal tournament in Groningen, the strongest Swiss tournament played until that time. Also in 1993, he contested the Biel FIDE Interzonal Tournament, coming 10th in a tightly fought contest, thereby qualifying for the FIDE Candidates cycle. In the PCA Candidates, Anand defeated Oleg Romanishin 5-2 in a best of eight match held in New York in 1994, then followed up shortly afterwards with a 5.5-1.5 demolition of Adams at Linares in the Candidates semi-final. In Las Palmas in 1995, he defeated Gata Kamsky in the final for the right to meet Garry Kasparov. In 1995, Anand met Kasparov at the World Trade Center in New York to play the match. After an opening run of eight draws, Anand won game nine but lost four of the next five to eventually concede the match 10½–7½. Conversely, in the concurrent FIDE cycle, Anand lost his quarter-final match to Kamsky, who went on to lose the 1996 FIDE championship match against Karpov. In 1997, Anand won the knock-out matches at Groningen for an opportunity to challenge FIDE World Champion Karpov, defeating Predrag Nikolic 2-0, Alexander Khalifman 3.5-2.5 (in the rapid and blitz tiebreak), Zoltan Almasi 2-0, Alexey Shirov 1.5-0.5, Boris Gelfand 1.5-0.5, and Adams 5-4 in a hard fought sudden death tiebreaker. In the 1998 FIDE cycle, FIDE controversially seeded the reigning champion Karpov directly into the final against the winner of the seven-round single elimination Candidates tournament. Despite coming through an extremely arduous campaign of 31 games in 30 days, Anand was able to draw the regular match 3-3, forcing a rapid playoff. However, the rapid playoff was won 2-0 by Karpov, allowing him to defend his FIDE championship.

In 2000, Anand beat Alexey Shirov 3½–½ in the final match of the FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2000) in Teheran to become the FIDE World Chess Champion, after defeating Victor Bologan, Smbat Lputian, Bartlomiej Macieja, Khalifman, and Adams in the preliminary rounds. He failed to defend the title in 2002, losing in the semifinals to Ivanchuk after defeating Olivier Touzane, Peter Heine Nielsen, Vladislav Tkachiev, Dreev, and Shirov in the earlier rounds. Anand did not compete in the FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004), but tied for second with Peter Svidler in the FIDE World Championship Tournament (2005) at San Luis in Mexico with 8½ points out of 14 games, 1½ points behind the winner, Veselin Topalov.

On the basis of his results at San Luis, Anand was seeded directly into the double round-robin World Championship Tournament (2007) in Mexico City, which he won with a score of 9/14 points, a full point ahead of joint second place finishers, Vladimir Kramnik and Boris Gelfand, thereby succeeding Kramnik as the title holder of the unified World Championship. Kramnik had taken the non-FIDE world championship title from Kasparov in the Kasparov - Kramnik Classical World Championship Match (2000), so this victory made Anand the undisputed world champion for the first time. In Bonn in October 2008, Anand again bested Kramnik for the championship, this time in a traditional one-on-one match, scoring 6.5-4.5 (+3 -1 =7) in the Anand - Kramnik World Championship Match (2008).

The following year, Anand successfully defended his title in the Anand - Topalov World Championship Match (2010) by 6.5-5.5 after winning the 12th and final classical game scheduled for the match. In May 2012, he faced the winner of the World Championship Candidates (2011), Boris Gelfand, to again successfully defend his title, winning the Anand - Gelfand World Championship Match (2012) 2.5-1.5 (+1 =3) in the rapid game tiebreaker after drawing the classical games 6-6 (+1 -1 =10).

As a result of Magnus Carlsen winning the World Championship Candidates (2013), the Anand - Carlsen World Championship Match (2013) was played in November 2013. The first four games were drawn before Carlsen won the fifth and sixth games. The seventh and eighth games were drawn, with Carlsen then winning the ninth game and drawing the tenth and last game to win the crown from Anand, producing a final score of 6.5-3.5 (+3 =7) in Carlsen's favor.

Rematch with Carlsen 2014

Anand's loss in the 2013 World Championship match with Carlsen did, however, qualify him to play in the World Championship Candidates (2014), which he won with a round to spare. He therefore won the right to challenge Carlsen in a rematch, the Carlsen - Anand World Championship Match (2014), which commenced on 8 November 2014 in Sochi, in Russia and finished on 23 November.

The first game of the match was a fighting draw, with Anand playing a queen pawn's opening and Carlsen successfully defending a Grunfeld. Carlsen drew first blood in game two, playing the White side of a quiet Ruy Lopez. After the first rest day, Anand struck back strongly, playing the White side of a Queen's Gambit Declined (D37), and overcame Carlsen before the first time control. In game 4, Anand played the Sicilian, but Carlsen steered the opening into a quiet positional struggle that ended in a draw. Game 5 was a Queen's Indian Defence which also ended in a draw. Game 6 may have been the turning point in the match. Playing Black, Anand missed a simple tactical stroke that would have given him a very strong, if not winning position. After missing this continuation, Anand's game weakened and Carlsen brought home the point to take the lead in the match for the second time.

Anand defended Game 7 with another Berlin Defence but eventually encountered difficulties and surrendered a piece for two pawns. However, his defence kept Carlsen at bay for 122 moves before the game was finally drawn due to insufficient mating material on the board. Game 8 in the match was another QGD, with Anand playing White. Carlsen introduced an innovation from his home preparation that guaranteed him a relatively easy draw, forcing a mass exchange of pieces that left the position easily drawn. After the fourth rest day, play resumed with Anand employing a Berlin Defence to Carlsen's Ruy Lopez. The game soon finished through a draw by repetition, with Carlsen content to maintain his one-point lead. In Game 10, Anand again faced Carlsen defending a Grunfeld, albeit not as convincingly as in Game 1. Anand had a long initiative but failed to secure the win, with Carlsen exhausting the opportunities against him to force the draw. Game 11 was another Berlin Defence by Anand which turned into a complex and hard fought middle game following an innovation by him on the queenside, which he followed up with an exchange sacrifice. Anand was unable to make sufficient inroads into Carlsen's position, and after a series of trades that increased Carlsen's material advantage, Anand resigned the game and the match.

Match result: Anand lost by 4.5-6.5 (+1 -3 =7).

World Championship Cycle 2016

As the loser of his world title challenge to Carlsen in 2014, Anand automatically qualified for the Candidates Tournament of 2016.

Tournaments

Anand is the only player to have won the super tournament at Wijk aan Zee (Corus from 1989-2010) five times. He is the first player to have achieved victories in each of the three big chess supertournaments: Corus/Wijk aan Zee (1989, 1998, 2003, 2004, 2006), Linares (1998, 2007, 2008), Dortmund (1996, 2000, 2004).

One of Anand's earliest serious successes in international tournaments that brought him to international attention include his tie for first place in the Sakthi Finance International Grandmasters Chess Tournament in 1987, enabling him to win his third GM norm, and thereby becoming the youngest Grandmaster in the world at that time. In 1989, he competed in the 4th International Games Festival in France, placing second overall in the Veterans vs. Youth Tournament, although he was first in the Youth category. During that event, Anand defeated former World Champions, Mikhail Tal and Boris Spassky in their individual encounters. In 1990, he won the 1990 Manchester Chess Festival and was =1st in the 1990 Triveni Super Grandmasters Tournament in Delhi. In 1992, Anand finished first in the category 18 Reggio Emilia Chess Tournament ahead of Kasparov and Karpov in the strongest tournament ever held until this time. Also in 1992, he won the Goodrich Open International Tournament in Kolkata and won the category 18 Alekhine Memorial tournament in Moscow ahead of Karpov. This raised Anand's rating to 2700, making him only the eighth person to attain the mark at that time. In 1994, he won the PCA Grand Prix in Moscow ahead of Kasparov

Major successes followed rapidly in 1996, when he finished 2nd at the Las Palmas super tournament and at the Magistral Tournament in Leon. There followed, in 1997, wins in the category 19 tournament in Dos Hermanes, the Invesbanka Chess tournament in Belgrade, the Credit Suisse Classic Tournament in Biel, and 2nd place in Dortmund. In 1998 he won the category 21 (average 2752) Linares tournament, as well as at Madrid and at the Fontys-Tilburg International Chess Tournament. In 1999, he won again at Wijk aan Zee. In 2000, he was runner up at Linares, won at Leon (beating Shirov 1½:½) and at Dortmund and also at the 2000 FIDE World Cup in Shenyeng, defeating Evgeny Bareev 1.5 - 0.5 in the final to win. He successfully defended his World Cup title in 2002 in Hyderabad. In 2001, Anand finished 1st in the 2nd Torneo Magistral Tournament in Mexico City, a clear point ahead Nigel Short, Khalifman and Hernandez. In 2002, he won the Eurotel World Chess Trophy in Prague, defeating Jan Timman (2-0), Khalifman (2-0), Sokolov (1.5-0.5), Ivanchuk (2.5-1.5) and Karpov (1.5-0.5) in the final. He won Corus in 2003 and 2004, and took out Dortmund in 2004. In spring of 2006, following a record-extending fifth victory at Corus Group A (2006), Anand became only the fourth player ever to crack the 2800-Elo mark in FIDE ratings, following Kasparov, Vladimir Kramnik, and Veselin Topalov. A few months after he won the World Championship in 2007, he won the (category 21) Morelia-Linares (2008) outright with 8.5 points, winning at Linares for the third time in his career. Following mediocre (for Anand) results in 2012 which saw him slip out of the top 5 for the first time in nearly 20 years, Anand scored 8/13 to place =3rd behind Carlsen and Aronian at the category 20 Tata Steel Group A (2013) event, and defeated Aronian in round 4 in a game that is becoming known as Anand's Immortal.*

2013 saw Anand breaking his tournament drought by winning outright at the category 19 GRENKE Chess Classic (2013) with 6.5/10, winning in the last round to head off Fabiano Caruana by half a point at the pass. This was his first tournament win since Linares in 2008. A few weeks later he placed 2nd behind Caruana at the Category 21 Zurich Chess Challenge (2013) with 3/6 (+1 -1 =4), losing one game to Caruana and defeating Kramnik in his sole win. In April-May 2013, Anand placed outright 3rd at the category 20 Alekhine Memorial (2013), a half point behind Levon Aronian and Gelfand, with 5/9 (+2 -1 =6), a par for rating performance. Soon afterwards he played in the category 21 Norway Chess (2013), scoring 5/9, another par for rating effort. His next tournament was the category 22 Tal Memorial (2013) in June 2013 was one of his worst results in many years, finishing near the bottom of the field with 3.5/9 (+1 -3 =5), also causing him to shed 11 rating points and four places in his world ranking.

After he lost his title defense to Carlsen, Anand next's tournament was the category 23 Zurich Chess Challenge (2014) in which he placed 4th with a scored of 2/5. In the lead up to the return match against Carlsen in November 2014, Anand placed a decisive 1st at the category 21 Bilbao Masters (2014), winning with a round to spare in the six game round robin event. Soon after his unsuccessful attempt to regain the crown from Carlsen in November 2014, Anand won the category 22 London Chess Classic (2014) in December 2014 ahead of Kramnik, Giri, Nakamura, Adams and Caruana. A few months later he racked up another major league triumph when he won standard section of the category 22 RR Zurich Chess Challenge (2015) ahead of outright runner-up, Hikaru Nakamura and the supporting cast of Kramnik, Sergey Karjakin, Aronian and Caruana respectively. He was unable to maintain the lead in the follow-up section of the event, the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2015), and tied with Nakamura for first place. However, he lost an Armageddon tiebreaker to finish with second prize. Anand continued his strong form at the category 21 Gashimov Memorial (2015) held in April 2015, placing outright second with 6/9 (+3 =6), a point behind the winner Carlsen, and a point ahead of joint third place getters Wesley So and Fabiano Caruana. Two months later, he again displayed his excellent form, finishing an undefeated 2nd behind a resurgent Topalov at the category 22 Norway Chess (2015) event in Stavanger, with 6/9 (+3 =6; TPR 2899) and defeating Carlsen in their individual game.

Olympiads

Anand played board 4 for India in 1984, and top board in 1986, 1988, 1990, 1992, 2004 and 2006, winning a silver medal on top board in 2004.

Matches

In 1992, Anand defeated the then number 3 Vassily Ivanchuk by 5:3 in a match held in Linares. In 1997, he played an exhibition simul against 6 computers at the Aegon Man Vs Computers chess event, winning 4-2. In 1998 at the Siemens Nixdorf Duell (Rapid) event in Frankfurt, he beat the then world open category computer chess champion Fritz 5 (1.5-0.5). In 1999 at the Torneo Magistral de Ajedrez in Leon, he beat Karpov 5:1. He won the 2001 "Duel of the Champions", defeating Kramnik in a rapid game match 6.5-5.5 and in 2009, he defeated Leko 5-3 in the Leko - Anand Rapid Match (2009).

Teams

In 1986, he won a team silver medal and a an individual gold medal for board four in the Asian Team Championship. He scored 7/7 in the 1989 Asian Team Chess Championship thereby helping his team to a team bronze as well as winning the top board prize as well as the individual best performance of the tournament. He has played in the Bundesliga, the French and Hungarian Team Championships and the European Club Cup. In 2009, he lead the Rest of the World from board 1 to a decisive 21.5-10.5 victory in the Azerbaijan vs the World (2009) event. He played top board for Baden-Baden in a couple of rounds, helping his team to win the 2013-14 Bundesliga.

Rapids

Anand has always been renowned for the speed of his calculation and moves. His early classical games were often played at close to blitz speed and this prowess has stood him in good stead to enable him to become perhaps the greatest blitz and rapid player of all time. His prowess at quick-play chess has earned him the nickname "The Lightning Kid."

The Chess Classic at Mainz, essentially the annual open world rapid championship, that had commenced in 1994 and finished up in 2010 had become Anand's personal property as he won it 11 times out of the 17 times it had been staged, including nine consecutive wins from 2000 through to 2008. In addition, he has won the annual overall Amber Blindfold and Rapid Chess Championships in 1994, 1997, 2003, 2005 and 2006, the Amber Rapid 7 times, and he was the only player to win the blind and rapid sections of the Amber tournament in the same year (twice: in 1997 and 2005). Other significant sequences were the six consecutive wins at Corsica from 1999 through 2005, and seven wins at Leon in 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, Ciudad de Leon XVIII (2005), XIX Ciudad de Leon (2006), and 2007. Other victories include 1st place at the 1996 Credit Swiss Rapid Chess Grand Prix, in Geneva, where he beat Garry Kasparov in the final, 1st in Wydra in Haifa in 1999 and 2000, 1st in the 2000 Plus GSM World Blitz Chess Cup in Warsaw where he won outright with 17.5 Points in 22 Games, defeating Karpov, Gelfand and Svidler, 1st in the 2000 Fujitsu Siemens Giants Chess (Rapid) in Frankfurt, winning the 2006 Mikhail Tal Memorial Blitz Tournament in Moscow with 23/34, which involved winning 11 out of 17 mini-matches to claim the strongest Blitz tournament in the history of the game, beating his eventual successor to the rapid crown, Aronian, by a 2 point margin. He is also the 2003 FIDE World Rapid Chess Champion by virtue of winning the Cap D'Agde FRA (2003). On 27 March 2011 in Tashkent in Uzbekistan, Anand defeated Rustam Kasimdzhanov in a rapid play match by 3.5-0.5 and in September 2011, he won the Botvinnik Memorial Rapid (2011) ahead of Aronian, Kramnik and Carlsen with 4.5/6 (+3 =3 -0). In In June 2011, he won the rapid XXIV Magistral de Ajedrez Ciudad de Leon (2011) 4.5-1.5 (+3 -0 =3) and in October 2011, he defeated Shakhriyar Mamedyarov by 2-0 in the final to win the Corsica Masters (2011).

Anand competed in the rejigged London Classic of 2013, and qualified for the final rounds by placing =1st in the London Chess Classic (Group A) (2013), but then lost to Kramnik in the London Chess Classic (Knockout) (2013). He placed =2nd in the World Rapid Championship (2014) with 10.5/15, half a point behind the winner, Carlsen, whom he defeated in their individual encounter, and scored 13.5/21 (placing =5th) in the World Blitz Championship (2014). He came =3rd with 8/10 at the London Chess Classic 2014 Super Rapidplay Open. Anand became the World Rapid Champion when he won the World Rapid Championship (2017) following a two-game blitz playoff for first with young Russian Grandmaster Vladimir Fedoseev.

Awards

Anand has won the Chess Oscar on 6 occasions, in 1997, 1998, 2003, 2004, 2007, and 2008. He has received many other national and international awards including the Arjuna award for Outstanding Indian Sportsman in Chess in 1985, the inaugural Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna Award, India's highest sporting honour in the year 1991–1992, the British Chess Federation's 'Book of the Year' Award in 1998 for his book My Best Games of Chess, the Padma Bhushan in 2000, the Sportstar Millennium Award in 1998 from India's premier Sports magazine for being the sportperson of the millennium. In 2007, he was awarded India's second highest civilian award, the Padma Vibhushan, making him the first sportsperson to receive the award in Indian history and received the 'Global Strategist Award' for mastering many formats of World Chess Championships by National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM) in 2011.

Personal

Anand holds a Bachelor's degree in Commerce from Loyola College in Chennai, India. Previously, he attended High School at Don Bosco. He is married to Aruna Anand and lives in Chennai along with his son Akhil Anand. In August 2010, Anand joined the Board of Directors of Olympic Gold Quest, a foundation for promoting and supporting India's elite sportspersons and potential young talent. In 2010 Anand donated his World Championship gold medal from his successful 2008 title defense to the charitable organisation "The Foundation" to be auctioned off for the benefit of underprivileged children.

Rating and Ranking

Anand is one of eight players in history to officially crack the 2800 mark, peaking at 2817 in March and May 2011, when he was also ranked world #1. Between April 2007 and May 2011, Anand was ranked world #1 for a total of 21 months.

At the age of 45 and after placing 2nd at the Gashimov Memorial Tournament in Shamkir, Anand re-entered the "2800 club" for the first time since exiting that rating bracket in November 2011. His result at the Norway Chess tournament in June 2015 pushed his rating back up to 2816, close to his peak rating to date, and to #2 in the world behind Carlsen.

As of November 5, 2023, Anand's live rating is 2748, No. 10 in the world. At age 53 (54 next month), he is 18 years older than Hikaru Nakamura, the second oldest top-10 player.

Sources and references

Live rating: http://www.2700chess.com/; Biography of Anand at the official FIDE website for the 2012 World Championship match: http://moscow2012.fide.com/en/prese...; Wikipedia article: Viswanathan Anand; * Aronian vs Anand, 2013

Last updated: 2023-11-05 21:14:23

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 163; games 1-25 of 4,065  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. V Perera vs Anand 1-0601984Asia-ch U20 8thC70 Ruy Lopez
2. Anand vs M Apicella 1-0251984World Championship (U16)B76 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
3. F Hellers vs Anand  0-1421984World Championship (U16)B81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
4. Anand vs M Matlak  ½-½321984World Junior ChampionshipC05 French, Tarrasch
5. J Piket vs Anand 0-1441984World Junior ChampionshipA48 King's Indian
6. Anand vs I B de Souza 1-0211984World Junior ChampionshipB82 Sicilian, Scheveningen
7. Anand vs C Hansen ½-½191984World Junior ChampionshipB05 Alekhine's Defense, Modern
8. S Saeed vs Anand  1-0341984World Junior ChampionshipE69 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Classical Main line
9. Anand vs L Sandstrom  0-1361984World Junior ChampionshipB62 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer
10. G Rechlis vs Anand 0-1321984World Junior ChampionshipE63 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Panno Variation
11. Anand vs P Wolff 0-1221984World Junior ChampionshipB09 Pirc, Austrian Attack
12. L Galego vs Anand  0-1431984World Junior ChampionshipB30 Sicilian
13. H Korhonen vs Anand  0-1301984World Junior ChampionshipB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
14. Anand vs P K Wells  1-0361984World Junior ChampionshipB15 Caro-Kann
15. Anand vs Dreev  ½-½421984World Junior ChampionshipC05 French, Tarrasch
16. K Georgiev vs Anand 1-0351984World Junior ChampionshipE63 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Panno Variation
17. Chandler vs Anand  1-03819848th Lloyds Bank Masters OpenB62 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer
18. Anand vs P K Wells  ½-½2319848th Lloyds Bank Masters OpenB17 Caro-Kann, Steinitz Variation
19. Anand vs A Greenfeld 1-08019848th Lloyds Bank Masters OpenB43 Sicilian, Kan, 5.Nc3
20. Enoch Barumba vs Anand  0-1411984Thessaloniki OlympiadE91 King's Indian
21. Anand vs T Lirindzakis ½-½311984Thessaloniki OlympiadC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
22. Van der Wiel vs Anand 1-0271984Thessaloniki OlympiadB42 Sicilian, Kan
23. Anand vs D Hergott 1-0381984Thessaloniki OlympiadB33 Sicilian
24. Anand vs J Ochoa  0-1401984Thessaloniki OlympiadB33 Sicilian
25. P Ostermeyer vs Anand 0-1411984Thessaloniki OlympiadA15 English
 page 1 of 163; games 1-25 of 4,065  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Anand wins | Anand loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 626 OF 760 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-20-11  anandrulez: plang : obviously much better means relative to his previous performance :) and as far as his dominance goes , I should say he had a won game vs Kasparov in 2005 linares , he didnt convert it though . I feel some of the best players of all time are learners and not someone who just stagnates , so clearly in that aspect Vishy did improve his own chess .... Anand lost to Kasaparov in 2003 in a clearly drawn end game where Anand just blundered . techincally maybe the difference between them was much less than earlier .
Feb-20-11  SetNoEscapeOn: Maybe, but he was up 5-0 and failed to close it out over 22 games...
Feb-20-11  NGambit: <KingG:The discussion on who is the greater player should be jusdged on results and quality of games.>

In an ideal world...YES. But we don't live in an ideal world, do we?

1) Most of Karpov's career overlap with the cold war era (which were no ordinary circumstances). Fischer's win over Spassky was seen as an embarrassment by the Soviet Union because they were beaten in their own game. Keeping domination in chess was a of symbolic importance. So, with doubts over his authority as World Champion having won the title without by forfeiture, there is no surprise that Karpov received all the support he needed from the establishment as metioned in yalie's post above.

2) If you are wondering what can be the degree of support (or influence) of the establishment I am talking about, let me quote Karpov himself from his book "Karpov on Karpov" (Atheneum 1993): "...Because of Fischer's overwhelming form at that time, Korchnoi and Petrosian were asked by Soviet chess authorities to choose between themselves, before the match, who they thought would have the better chance of stopping Fischer in the finals. Petrosian apparently believed strongly in himself, and so Korchnoi was asked to throw the match, receiving as compensation invitations to the three most prestigious tournaments in western Europe." (Korchnoi's defeat in the candidates semifinal versus Tigran Petrosian by (-1 =9), also at Moscow)

3) In the run up to Karpov vs Korchnoi candidates final match to decide challeger to Fischer, Korchnoi was constantly subjected to threats and harassment, and was virtually unable to find any Grandmasters to assist him.

4) Even when Korchnoi had defected and was to challenger to Karpov for the title, his wife and son were still in the Soviet Union. His son had been promised to be released to join his father in exile if he gave up his passport. When he did so, he was promptly drafted into the Soviet army. In spite of protests, Korchnoi's son was arrested for evading army service, sentenced to two and a half years in labour camp, and served the full sentence. After the release, he was again refused permission to leave the USSR.

The point is that Karpov was immensely helped by the <circumstances> and every effort was made by Soviet chess authorities to make him look a worthy world champion. This is not to take away anything from the great player that Karpov is. Only that sometimes one can be made to "look greater" than one actually is.

Therefore, Karpov's dominance from 1975 to 1985 must be seen in the right light.

Feb-21-11  NGambit: <vanytchouck:And Anand was receiving some personal lessons from Manuel Aaron>

With all due respect to Manuel Aron (Who it seems was one of India's only <international master> till Anand), does that compare with inputs from somebody like Botvinnik (one of the gratest players and chess teacher of all time)? To give an idea about the impact somebody like him can have let me quote Kasparov...

"My chess philosophy has largely been developed under the influence of Ex-World Champion Mikhail Botvinnik. He played a <decisive role> in my formation as a chess player and determined the path of my subsequent improvement."

Feb-21-11  NGambit: While there is some discussion going on about Anand-Kasparov WCC Match-1995, here's an interesting interview of Anand immediately after the match:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r1F...

It was Anand'd first WC match (Kasparov's 7th!). In the interview Anand talks about how he learnt a lot about matches from this experience and things like that. A nice watch!

Feb-21-11  vanytchouck:

< NGambit:

<vanytchouck:And Anand was receiving some personal lessons from Manuel Aaron>

With all due respect to Manuel Aron (Who it seems was one of India's only <international master> till Anand), does that compare with inputs from somebody like Botvinnik (one of the gratest players and chess teacher of all time)? (...).>

Yes, of course it was.

Sometimes, People thinks that only great players can teach to another great players.

At 6 -10 years old, no matter how strong you are, any + 2200-2300 player can be a very useful teacher.

When you look at the first trainers of the great champions when they were 6-12 years old, you will almost always find 2100-2300 rated players seldomly really stronger.

This is not true in chess only, no need to be a Fields medalist to teach maths to great talents, no need to be an olympic champion to teach to future champions ...

< NGambit: (...)To give an idea about the impact somebody like him can have let me quote Kasparov...

"My chess philosophy has largely been developed under the influence of Ex-World Champion Mikhail Botvinnik. He played a <decisive role> in my formation as a chess player and determined the path of my subsequent improvement.">

Yes, indeed the Botvinnik's sessions was very useful to some chess players but there are things wich have to be taken into account :

There also have players who attended at the Botvinnik school without being great players (do you know who are Ketino Kachiani-Gersinska or Mikhail Oratovsky ?).

On the other side, we can be pretty sure that Karpov, Kasparov or Kramnik would still have been great players without the lessons from Botvinnik.

All these fantastic talents had their personal coaches (Alexander Nikitin for Kasparov for example).

Kasparov likes the legend according to which "only great champions can teach to future great champions" .

So even if i do think that Botvinnik's school sessions had a tremendous influence on Kasparov's understanding and way to work on chess, i still think that the difference between what Anand and the other soviet young talents had received is not that decisive (even if it was significant) < for a fantastic talented player like Anand >.

Feb-21-11  anandrulez: SetNoEscapeOn: Maybe, but he was up 5-0 and failed to close it out over 22 games...

Do you mean Anand had 5 winning positions ? I know he had a winning position in 2005 Linares which he didnt win .

Feb-21-11  Winsome Knight: <Do you mean Anand had 5 winning positions ? I know he had a winning position in 2005 Linares which he didnt win .>

SNEO meant Karpov Vs Kasparov, first WCC I guess.

Feb-21-11  KingG: From what I remember, Karpov credited Botvinnik with making him understand the importance of working hard on his chess, and of opening theory. Apart from that, he says he was often ignored at the Botvinnik school because of his terrible opening play, and as we can see from some of Botvinnik's comments about Karpov, he wasn't exactly his favourite student.

I would say that it is undeniable Kasparov benifited enormously from Botvinnik's influence, as he was clearly Botvinnik's favourite student, and Botvinnik spent a lot of time with him. Obviously, someone with the talent of Kasparov would always have become a great player, but probably not as great as he actually became. I'm not sure going to Botvinnik's school made that much difference for Karpov, and it seems his style was already clearly defined by the time he went there anyway.

Feb-21-11  KingG: <In an ideal world...YES. But we don't live in an ideal world, do we?> No, this is how we judge it in the real world as well, because it is the only objective way of measuring things. All the rest is subjective guess work. The truth is we can never be completely sure how things would have developed if Fischer or Anand had grown up in the Soviet Union, or if Karpov or Kasparov had grown up somewhere else, so it is pointless to speculate with regards to deciding how the greatest player was. The could also be advantages to growing up in a less structured chess environment. For example, here is an interesting quote:

<Potentially, Garry is an outstanding tactician who thinks originally and has a fine, sharp sense for dynamic positions. The trainers who worked with him concentrated on another of his assets, the most obvious one being his unique memory. This natural gift and his strong character, multiplied by his tremendous working ability, along with his ability to accumulate and retain information, produced the world champion; perhaps the greatest chess player of all time. Nevertheless, I believe that Garry did not realize his true chess potential to the maximum. Great knowledge is a great burden. Young Kasparov was incredibly inventive, even in difficult positions. He knew how to transform them, to explode the situation on the board in his favor, and he collected points from the strongest opponents, who could not cope with such complications. Garry's chess talent had a lot in common with Tal's. Later these traits were greatly developed. Garry has been the world's strongest player for 20 years and still he is not fully satisfied. Due to the constant pressure on him, Garry can't play a single game for his own pleasure. Those who've seen friendly games by Kasparov, when he plays in a relaxed manner without worrying about the outcome, will never forget it: what spectacular chess!> - Valeri Tsaturian

So according to Tsaturian, Kasparov's chess training actually ended up hindering him.

Feb-21-11  shivasuri4: That's just your interpretation,<KingG>.Did you read the initial part?
Feb-21-11  SetNoEscapeOn: "Quality of the games" is inherently subjective.
Feb-21-11  shivasuri4: Hey <KingG>,look up the Goldsby-E.Jonsson game.As usual,the insults continue to pour from our beloved "original" life master.
Feb-21-11  KingG: <"Quality of the games" is inherently subjective.> Maybe, but a lot less so than trying to compare the talent of such great players as Anand, Karpov, and Kasparov, or trying to guess what would have happened if Anand had been born in the Soviet Union.
Feb-21-11  drik: <vanytchouck: Sometimes, People thinks that only great players can teach to another great players.>

You speak of 6-12 year old future world champions - but someone with that level of talent will easily reach 2400 strength with little or training. See Niaz Murshed who was Bangladesh's strongest player at 12, or Arturo Pomar who was Spain's best at 13. But without TOP level help they struggled to keep on improving.

You don't need a Fields medal to teach a Fields medal winner at high school - but you need to be at that level to supervise them effectively at grad school.

<Karpov, Kasparov or Kramnik would still have been great players without the lessons from Botvinnik.>

Great ... but not as great. You don't think that their families let them leave home as children for nothing? How many Russian World Champions in the last 40 years did NOT study at the Botvinnik school?

Anand mentions that when he was beginning to reach world class in the late 80's several Soviet superGMs were stunned by his talent ... but insisted on commiserating with him. Because, they insisted, without having been tutored in the Soviet system he had no chance of winning the crown!

The plain fact is that Anand has been 300 Elo stronger than anyone in his country - apart from Julio Granda Zuniga of Peru, I know of nobody else whose achievements exceed his environment to such a degree.

Feb-21-11  drik: <I know of nobody else whose achievements exceed his environment to such a degree.>

OK! OK! Capablanca & Mir Sultan Khan come to mind ... but the list is small.

Feb-21-11  vanytchouck: < drik:

<vanytchouck: Sometimes, People thinks that only great players can teach to another great players.>

You speak of 6-12 year old future world champions - but someone with that level of talent will easily reach 2400 strength with little or training. See Niaz Murshed who was Bangladesh's strongest player at 12, or Arturo Pomar who was Spain's best at 13. But without TOP level help they struggled to keep on improving.(...)>

What do you call "TOP level help" ?

If you mean "help from top players", you're wrong as a top GM can be a very bad teacher.

Dvoretsky or Dorfman are fantastic coaches but not TOP players.

A good help, is the help from a player really stronger than you, who can anlyse your game very well and who can see the point you need to work (and most of all : "how ").

When you're at 6-12, no matter how strong you are (except of course, if you are already 2500), a 2300 elo rated player is far enough.

At this age, there is little difference between being coached by a 2300 or by a 2700 elo rated player.

The difference does exist when the understanding of the young talent is far deeper than a 2500 rated player (in the analysis any 2300 player can understand moves from a 2500).

< drik:

(...) You don't need a Fields medal to teach a Fields medal winner at high school - but you need to be at that level to supervise them effectively at grad school.(...)>

Do you really think that a thesis has any chance to be at the level of a paper worth the medal Fields ???

< drik :
(...)
<Karpov, Kasparov or Kramnik would still have been great players without the lessons from Botvinnik.>

Great ... but not as great.(...)>

Pure speculation. We just don't know how these players would have improve in another country.

< drik :
(...)
You don't think that their families let them leave home as children for nothing? (...)>

At the cost of a repetition, it was one or two sessions each year, during the vacation.

< drik :
(...)
How many Russian World Champions in the last 40 years did NOT study at the Botvinnik school? (...)>

Here again the same mistake :

Were Karpov, Kasparov, Kramnik AMONG MANY OTHER YOUNG TALENTS pupils of the Botvinnik's school because they were future world champ or the opposite ?

On the other side, Kamsky, Ivantchouck, Gelfand, etc didn't attended at this school.

Not to mention the other great talents from other countries.

< drik :
(...) Anand mentions that when he was beginning to reach world class in the late 80's several Soviet superGMs were stunned by his talent ... but insisted on commiserating with him. Because, they insisted, without having been tutored in the Soviet system he had no chance of winning the crown!

(...)>

So what ? The soviet players were over confident in their system and had a bad jugdment about Anand ...

< drik :
(...) The plain fact is that Anand has been 300 Elo stronger than anyone in his country (...)>

Why is it an evidence of anything ?

As i've already written (sorry for quoting myself), it's like being very rich in a very poor country.

Anand did grow up in a very poor country (chessly speaking) but from a wealthy enough (here again, chessly speaking) environment.

Feb-21-11  shivasuri4: Well,<vanytchouck>,Dvoretsky is a pretty strong player.He had a fairly high peak rating of 2540 and that too a long time ago.Must have been good enough to be in the top 100.
Feb-21-11  percyblakeney: <Dvoretsky is a pretty strong player.He had a fairly high peak rating of 2540 and that too a long time ago.Must have been good enough to be in the top 100.>

Top 20 at his peak, as Dorfman, according to Chessmetrics. In the Soviet Championship 1974 Dvoretsky was one point from first place, with only Tal, Beliavsky, Vaganian and Polugaevsky ahead of him. Chessmetrics have all 16 players in the top 100, most of them ranked much higher than 50th.

Dorfman shared first in the same event three years later, ahead of players like Petrosian, Polugaevsky, Geller and Tal, with a dozen participants in the top 25, once again according to Chessmetrics.

So Dvoretsky and Dorfman were quite strong players at their best, especially Dorfman who still is good even if he peaked 35 years ago. He was undefeated in the French Championship last year, even if his games were rather peaceful to say the least... In 2007 he was only one point behind the winning MVL though.

Feb-21-11  NGambit: NGambit: <KingG: The discussion on who is the greater player should be jusdged on results and quality of games...because it is the only <objective> way of measuring things.>

Generally speaking (under ideal circumstances), I couldn't agree with you more. But for the reasons I have mentioned in my previous post it is clear that we <cannot assume ideal circumstances> when talking about Karpov's performance (results and "quality of games") in the 70s and 80s (when people were forced to <throw> matches as high profile as Candidate semifinals and finals, and forced to work for the WC so that he looks a worthy beholder). And therefore even <results> are not a completely <objective> way of measuring things <in this particular case>.

<vanytchouck: ...I still think that the difference between what Anand and the other soviet young talents had received is not that decisive (even if it was significant) < for a fantastic talented player like Anand >.>

Exactly. I am not contending that it is a decisive factor, but definitely significant enough to be mentioned. The fact that Anand reached the top despite that (the only non-soviet player since Fischer to do so) is an outstanding achievement.

My only contention is that the answer to "Who is greater, Karpov or Anand?" is not an overwhelming "Karpov!" anymore. Obviously it's a subjective question. But, the most <reasonable> answer IMO is that it's probably very close between the two (<a lot> closer than we used to think few years ago).

Feb-21-11  AuN1: botvinnik would say anything to discredit karpov after he proclaimed that the young anatoly would never amount to anything as a chess player when he first met him.

after karpov became world champion what else was there to do from mikhail moiseivich but to claim that karpov only succeeded by exploiting others' ideas? that statement in and of itself hardly seems apt, as it were, because most people who've followed kaprov's games could tell you that he did not come up with fancy novelties a la kasparov, with a few exceptions here and there such as the ng5 against korchnoi; but by and large most of his victories could be attributed to an excellent positional understanding, and superb endgame mastery.

Feb-21-11  KingG: <(when people were forced to <throw> matches as high profile as Candidate semifinals and finals, and forced to work for the WC so that he looks a worthy beholder> What matches were thrown during the 70's and 80's? So far there has been some allegation of Korchnoi throwing a match to Petrosian, which had nothing to do with helping Karpov, and which I don't think it is proven was actually thrown anyway.

As for Karpov receiving help from other GMs, I'm sure he never had a team as powerful as Anand did for his match with Topalov.

Feb-21-11  AuN1: so many people have claimed that karpov benefited tremendously from having some of the best theoreticians working for him, but when was he ever blowing anyone out of the water with opening novelties?
Feb-22-11  shivasuri4: What about improving endgame technique,<AuN1>,known as it is that Karpov is strong in the area?
Feb-22-11  drik: <If you mean "help from top players", you're wrong as a top GM can be a very bad teacher. Dvoretsky or Dorfman are fantastic coaches but not TOP players.>

I meant BOTH. To excel it is MUCH easier if you have the TOP coaches like Dvoretsky & TOP players like Yusupov to practice against. Players like Pomar, Murshed & Anand had NEITHER. This makes Anand achievements all the more impressive.

<When you're at 6-12, no matter how strong you are (except of course, if you are already 2500), a 2300 elo rated player is far enough. At this age, there is little difference between being coached by a 2300 or by a 2700 elo rated player.>

I have just said in my post that they key development period for such talents is in the 2500+ region (13-17). I guess you know this or you would not be focussing on the 6-12 age range! By the time Anand was 15, he was probably the strongest player in India by a large margin - so he had to teach himself from an earlier age than most.

<do you really think that a thesis has any chance to be at the level of a paper worth the medal Fields ???>

Did you read my comment? I said anyone can teach a Fields medal winner at High School. But to supervise THEM (the Fields medal winner) at Grad school - the supervisor should be almost at that level. Else the supervision is ineffective or superfluous. I take it English is not your first language.

<Pure speculation. We just don't know how these players would have improve in another country.>

But statistically compelling speculation. How many players of that level developed inside the USSR & how many outside. The Soviets didn't always win ... but that was the way to bet. It took phenomenal talent like Fischer or Anand to break the odds - greats like Reshevsky, Portisch, Larsen, Mecking, Andersson, Short etc. all failed.

<At the cost of a repetition, it was one or two sessions each year, during the vacation.>

Still one or two annual sessions = hundreds of hours of bespoke tuition MORE than Anand ever received.

<Were Karpov, Kasparov, Kramnik AMONG MANY OTHER YOUNG TALENTS pupils of the Botvinnik's school because they were future world champ or the opposite ?>

The school improved the technical ability & erudition of ALL its pupils. It gave them an advantage over external rivals. Some benefited more than others, & some had greater potential than others.

<On the other side, Kamsky, Ivantchouck, Gelfand, etc didn't attended at this school. Not to mention the other great talents from other countries.>

...& how many of these have ever become World Champion? Kamsky & Gelfand probably fulfilled their talents - but Ivanchuk! Perhaps if he had had the training that Kasparov had, he could have surpassed him.

<So what ? The soviet players were over confident in their system and had a bad jugdment about Anand ...>

So what? The fact that they were wrong is not the issue. The fact is that Soviet GMs regarded their training as being SUCH an advantage that almost no level of talent was sufficient to overcome it.

<Why is it an evidence of anything ?>

WHY? WHY? Is it not more impressive to win a race when you start far behind your opponents? Edmund Hilary & Tensing Norgay both climbed Everest ... but Tensing carried Hiliary's luggage for most of the journey. Whose achievement was the more impressive?

You are fond of Mathematics? Who was the greater mathematician, GH Hardy from his privileged educational background - or his student Srinivasa Ramanujan, (who was self taught to such an extent that he completed his PhD without ever doing a a BSc)?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 760)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 626 OF 760 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC