chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Hikaru Nakamura
Nakamura 
 

Number of games in database: 3,902
Years covered: 1995 to 2025
Last FIDE rating: 2804 (2734 rapid, 2837 blitz)
Highest rating achieved in database: 2816
Overall record: +592 -245 =719 (61.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 2346 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (271) 
    B90 B30 B23 B51 B42
 Ruy Lopez (171) 
    C65 C67 C78 C77 C84
 Reti System (147) 
    A06 A04 A05
 Queen's Gambit Declined (119) 
    D37 D31 D38 D30 D35
 Queen's Pawn Game (115) 
    A45 D00 D02 E10 A46
 Nimzo Indian (77) 
    E32 E46 E34 E21 E20
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (251) 
    B90 B30 B80 B22 B92
 Ruy Lopez (247) 
    C67 C65 C70 C78 C72
 Queen's Gambit Declined (155) 
    D37 D31 D30 D06 D39
 Queen's Pawn Game (123) 
    D02 A45 A40 A41 A46
 King's Indian (115) 
    E97 E90 E92 E63 E94
 Giuoco Piano (107) 
    C53 C50 C54
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Krasenkow vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Gelfand vs Nakamura, 2010 0-1
   Rybka vs Nakamura, 2008 0-1
   So vs Nakamura, 2015 0-1
   G Sagalchik vs Nakamura, 2003 0-1
   Crafty vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Nakamura vs Karjakin, 2004 1-0
   Nakamura vs Kramnik, 2012 1-0
   A Beliavsky vs Nakamura, 2009 0-1
   Nakamura vs J W Loyte, 2001 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Corsica Masters (2007)
   Trophee CCAS (2008)
   Bullet Chess Championship (2023)
   Meltwater Tour Final (2021)
   Magnus Carlsen Invitational (2020)
   Ordix Open (2009)
   Chess.com Speed Chess Championship 2017/18 (2017)
   chess.com Speed Chess (2020)
   Magnus Carlsen Chess Tour Finals (2020)
   New In Chess Classic (2021)
   Chess.com SpeedChess Finals (2024)
   Tata Steel India (2022)
   Champions Showdown (2019)
   Pro Chess League (2018)
   PRO League Group Stage (2019)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Naka's Nook Mistook Fredthebear stan theo by fredthebear
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 212 by 0ZeR0
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 243 by 0ZeR0
   Notable Nakamura Games by caracas1970
   book: Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by Baby Hawk
   Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by kenilworthian
   Vid e o put Fredthebear in th is cent ury by fredthebear
   Notable Nakamura Games by iron maiden
   2020 The Corona Beer & Black Bears Matter Mo Ode by fredthebear
   Hikaru! by larrewl
   Match Nakamura! by docjan
   Match Nakamura! by amadeus

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 Freestyle Grand Tour Paris
   Nakamura vs Carlsen (Apr-14-25) 1/2-1/2, unorthodox
   Carlsen vs Nakamura (Apr-13-25) 1-0, unorthodox
   Keymer vs Nakamura (Apr-12-25) 0-1, unorthodox
   Nakamura vs Keymer (Apr-11-25) 1/2-1/2, unorthodox
   Nakamura vs A Erigaisi (Apr-10-25) 1-0, unorthodox

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Hikaru Nakamura
Search Google for Hikaru Nakamura
FIDE player card for Hikaru Nakamura

HIKARU NAKAMURA
(born Dec-09-1987, 37 years old) Japan (federation/nationality United States of America)

[what is this?]

IM (2001); GM (2003). Hikaru Nakamura won the US Championship in 2004, 2009, 2012, 2015 and 2019. He was the world's second-ranked player as of October 2015. In July 2023, he married WGM Atousa Pourkashiyan.

Prodigy

Christopher Hikaru Nakamura was born December 9, 1987 in Hirakata in Osaka, Japan, to a Japanese father and an American mother. He is the younger brother of Asuka Nakamura. When he was two years old, he and his mother and brother moved to the United States. He started playing chess when he was seven, coached by his stepfather, Sunil Weeramantry. He was the youngest player in US history to defeat an International Master (Jay Bonin) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 0 months), to become a National Master (USCF) (10 years, 79 days), to defeat a Grandmaster (Arthur Bisguier) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 117 days), and to become an IM (13 years, 2 months), although most of these records have subsequently been surpassed. In 2003 he became the USA's youngest-ever grandmaster (15 years, 2 months and 19 days), a record later broken by Fabiano Caruana and Ray Robson.

Championships

<Youth> In 2001 he won the World U14 championship.

<National> When he won the Chessmaster US Championship 2005 (2004) (on tiebreak from Alexander Stripunsky), he was the youngest player to win the US championship since Robert James Fischer. He also won the US Championship (2009) outright by half a point ahead of the joint runners-up Robert Hess and Alexander Onischuk, and the United States Championship (2012) outright by a full point ahead of the winner of the 2010 and 2011 events, Gata Kamsky. He won the national title for a fourth time when he took out the US Championship (2015) with 8/11, half a point ahead of the outright runner up Ray Robson.

<World championship cycle> Seeded number 87 and aged 16, Nakamura reached the final 16 in the FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004), defeating 46th seed Sergey Volkov, 19th seeded Aleksej Aleksandrov, and 51st seed Alexander Lastin in the preliminary rounds before bowing out to number 3 seed and finalist Michael Adams in the round of 16. He qualified to play in the World Cup (2013) through his rating, and defeated Peruvian WGM Deysi Estela Cori Tello in the first round, Azeri GM Eltaj Safarli in the second round and Indian GM Baskaran Adhiban in the third round, but was eliminated in the Round of 16 (fourth round) by Ukrainian GM Anton Korobov. He qualified by rating to participate in the World Cup (2015), and is doing so although he has already qualified for the Candidates Tournament of 2016 via the Grand Prix series of 2014-15. He defeated Richmond Phiri, Sam Shankland in the first two rounds, as well as Ian Nepomniachtchi in a third round thriller that Nakamura won in the deciding Armageddon blitz tiebreaker game after the three previous sets of rapid and blitz tiebreakers had been drawn. In the Round of 16 (the fourth round) he won against Michael Adams by 1.5-0.5 but lost to Pavel Eljanov in the quarter final, bowing out of the event.

<Grand Prix Series 2012-2013> He started the Grand Prix series with last at the FIDE Grand Prix London (2012). After bouncing back into contention with outright second in the FIDE Grand Prix Zug (2013), a poor showing at the FIDE Grand Prix Thessaloniki (2013) eliminated him from contention for the top 2 spots that would have qualified him for the 2014 Candidates Tournament. (1) He did however place 3rd behind Fabiano Caruana and Boris Gelfand in the FIDE Grand Prix Paris (2013) to accumulate 300 GP points and place 6th in the 2012-13 Grand Prix series. Subsequently, his only chance to play in the 2014 Candidates Tournament was to be nominated as the Organizer's wild card once the venue was settled, however this did not eventuate.

<Grand Prix Series 2014-2015> Nakamura competed in the first leg of the series at the FIDE Grand Prix Baku (2014), where he scored 6/11 to place 3rd-7th, half a point behind the joint leaders Caruana and Gelfand. He therefore kicked off with a GP tally of 82 points, representing the even distribution of points applicable to each place from 3rd to 7th. In the second leg of the series, namely the FIDE Grand Prix Tashkent (2014), he placed =2nd and stood in 2nd place overall, excellently situated to take advantage of the opportunity to qualify for the Candidates tournament in 2016. He took full advantage of this in FIDE Grand Prix Khanty-Mansiysk (2015), when he came =1st to qualify for the Candidates Tournament of 2016.

Standard tournaments

In 2005, he won the 7th Foxwoods Open (2005).

In 2007, he won both the National Open (2007) that was held in Las Vegas and the Casino de Barcelona (2007).

The following year, he beat Xiangzhi Bu in the play-off to win the Gibraltar Masters (2008) Masters Open with 8.0/10.

Nakamura tied for first with Evgeny Najer at the 37th World Open (2009) after taking two last-day byes, each worth half a point and won the Donostia Chess Festival (2009) in tiebreak over Ruslan Ponomariov.

In 2010, he came =4th at Corus Group A (2010), and was equal top scorer in the victorious Rising Stars team in the Rising Stars - Experience (2010) tournament. He scored 5/9 (+1 -0 =8) at the Tal Memorial (2010), placing =4th, and finished the year with =4th place in the London Chess Classic (2010).

Nakamura began 2011 by taking clear first place at the A-Group of the prestigious category 20 Tata Steel Group A (2011) (formerly Corus) with a 9/13 score (+6 -1 =6) and a 2880 performance rating, ahead of a powerful field including the world's top four players: World Champion Viswanathan Anand, Magnus Carlsen, Levon Aronian and former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik. In June 2011, Nakamura placed =3rd in the Bazna King's Tournament (2011), in July he scored 4.5/10 at Dortmund Sparkassen (2011), in August he came =1st in the 2011 US Open Championship with 7.5/9 and in October he came =3rd in the Grand Slam Chess Final (2011) with 5/10. The following month, he suffered a lapse in form at the category 22 Tal Memorial (2011), scoring 3/9 and coming last but recovered to finish 2011 with second place behind Kramnik at the category 20 London Chess Classic (2011), scoring +4 -1 =3 (TPR of 2887).

He started 2012 by coming =2nd (4th on count back) at the Reggio Emilia (2011), half a point behind Anish Giri, and then came =5th at Tata Steel Group A (2012), scoring 7.5/13 (+3 -1 =9). He followed up in April 2012 with 1st at the 6th Annual Grand Pacific Open held in British Columbia. He competed in the Tal Memorial (2012) held in June, scoring 4/9. In July/August 2012, Nakamura placed a solid =3rd at the Biel Chess Festival (2012), but underperformed at the European Club Cup (2012), although in October 2012, he recovered to some extent by winning the 4 player double round robin 16th Unive Tournament (2012) (crown group) with 4.5/6 (+3 -0 =3). Nakamura finished 2012 with a strong 3rd placement in the London Chess Classic (2012) behind Carlsen and Kramnik, adding enough rating points to restore him to the top 10.

2013 started with a modest 7/13 result for outright 6th at the Tata Steel Group A (2013) event. He then followed up in May 2013 with equal 2nd at the Norway Chess (2013) with 5.5/9, half a point behind Sergey Karjakin and 3rd on tiebreak behind Carlsen; he also placed =2nd with 6/9 at the preliminary Norway Chess (Blitz) (2013) held to determine the draw for the main tournament, and earned the right to play with the White pieces in 5 games out of 9. In June 2013, he contested the category 22 Tal Memorial (2013), and was outright leader after 6 rounds. However, he lost the last 3 game to place 6th with 4.5/9, winning more games (4) and losing more games (4) than any other player in the tournament. Soon after, he came =3rd in the Houston Open in July 2013. In September he played in the quadrangular double round robin category 22 Sinquefield Cup (2013), and was in contention for first place until the last round, when he drew against Gata Kamsky finishing second with 3.5/6 (+2 -1 =3; TPR 2863) behind Magnus Carlsen.

Nakamura's first event in 2014 was the category 20 Tata Steel Masters (2014) where he scored 5/11 (+2 -3 =6) to shed a few rating points for FIDE's February rating list. He next competed in the category 23 Zurich Chess Challenge (2014) in which he placed 4th with 2/5 after coming agonisingly close to defeating World Champion Magnus Carlsen. He came 2nd with 3.5/5 in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2014) which followed the standard time event, to remain in 4th in the overall event with the results of the standard and rapid events combined. In April, he participated in the inaugural Gashimov Memorial (2014), a category XXII 6-player DRR event inaugurated in honor of the late Azeri grandmaster, scoring 5/10 and placing =3rd behind Carlsen and Caruana. At the London Chess Classic (2014), he scored 2.5/5 to place 4th.

Nakamura's start to 2015 was to win the powerful Gibraltar Masters (2015) with 8.5/10 (+7 =3), and return a PB on his live rating and his new FIDE rating due in March. Despite cracking the 2800 barrier in the live ratings during the RR category 22 Zurich Chess Challenge (2015) held in February, he placed outright 2nd in the standard portion of the event behind Anand, ahead of Kramnik, Karjakin, Aronian and Caruana respectively. His second place in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2015) with 3/5 made him =1st with Anand in the overall event, but he won an Armageddon tiebreaker with the former World Champion to win first prize. His good form continued at the category 22 Norway Chess (2015) event, where he was undefeated to place =2nd (3rd on a narrow SB tiebreak), behind Topalov and alongside Anand with 6/9 and a TPR of 2900. In September he competed in the second leg of the inaugural Grand Chess Tour at Sinquefield Cup (2015), and finished equal second with 5/9 behind Aronian in what amounted to a par for rating performance. October saw Nakamura compete in the lucrative Millionaire Chess (2015) tournament, which he won after battling through a complicated tiebreak system that involved a playoff to decide a playoff for fourth, and then winning a knockout rapid game semi-final that was called after round 7 of 9 of the main standard time event. He finished the year with a poor performance at the London Chess Classic (2015) where he came in toward the bottom of the field after scoring 4/9.

He started 2016 with an upbeat result at the Gibraltar Masters (2016), winning first prize after a rapid and blitz game tiebreak that ended in an Armageddon victory against runner-up Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. He finished clear second at the
FIDE Grand Swiss (2023), scoring 8/11 (+5 =6 -0) and qualifying for the 2024 Candidates tournament.

Team Events

<Olympiads> Nakamura has represented the U.S. in the Olympiads of 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2014, helping his country to the bronze medal in 2006 and 2008. He scored 6/10 during the Khanty-Mansiysk Olympiad (2010) on top board for the USA and a performance rating of 2741 and 6/9 in the Istanbul Olympiad (2012), coming in fourth on top board. His overall score in Olympiads is 31 points accumulated in 49 games played.

<World Team Championship> Nakamura played board 1 for the USA at the World Team Championship (2010), scoring individual gold and team silver. He also played top board at the World Team Championship (2013), winning individual silver and helping his team to 4th place in the event.

<European Club Cup> He played top board for the SK Husek Vienna in the European Club Cup (2009) and top board for the Italian club Obiettivo Risarcimento Padova in 2012 and 2013, second board for the Italian club in 2014 and board 3 for the same club in 2015. He scored individual bronze in 2013 and 2014.

Rapids

Nakamura is one of the world's best rapid and blitz players, and the world's best bullet (one-minute) player. He regularly plays on the internet, usually at the ICC where he is the highest rated player (userid <Smallville>), and at Playchess, where he is known as <Star Wars>. He has set many rating records under different categories. In 2008, he challenged and broke blitz king Alexander Grischuk 's record at ICC of 3737, reaching 3750. Grischuk subsequently challenged Nakamura to a 20 game 3 minutes blitz match, which Nakamura took out convincingly by 14.5-5.5. (2) He also won the first ICC Open in 2011 ahead of over 2000 other contestants. (3)

In 2007, he won the annual Corsica Masters (2007), defeating Rustam Kasimdzhanov in the final. One of the most convincing demonstrations of Nakamura's ability as a rapid player was when he won the Trophee CCAS (2008), defeating Xiangzhi Bu, Anatoly Karpov and Vasyl Ivanchuk in the playoff matches to take first prize in a field that included Carlsen. Nakamura also defeated Carlsen to take out the BNbank Blitz (2009). He was runner-up to Ivanchuk at the Cap d'Agde (2010) in the playoff. He also defeated Rising Stars team mate Anish Giri for the right to play at Amber 2011.

In 2012, Nakamura won the trifecta of silver medals at the SportAccord World Mind Games (Men's Rapid) (2012), the World Mind Games (Men's Blitz) and the World Mind Games (Men's Blindfold) events. He closed out 2013 by winning the London Chess Classic (Knockout) (2013), defeating Gelfand in the final by 1.5-0.5, after qualifying for the final by winning the preliminary London Chess Classic (Group C) (2013).

In June 2014, he competed in both the World Rapid Championship (2014) and the World Blitz Championship (2014) that were held in Dubai. In the former, he scored a relatively meager 8.5/15, losing 40 rapid rating points, while he was much more successful in the latter, scoring 16/21, being the runner up by a point behind the winner Magnus Carlsen. His blitz rating skyrocketed to over 2900. Subsequently he competed in the Super Rapidplay Open that was a companion event to the 2014 London Classic (see above), winning the event with an almost perfect score of 9.5/10. He also competed in the London Elite Player Blitz that was the other companion event, and placed =1st with 6/10.

The 2016 edition of the Zurich Chess Challenge was a two-part event, which kicked off with a preliminary Zurich Chess Challenge (Opening Blitz) (2016) to determine who had three whites in the five rounds of the Zurich Chess Challenge (2016) (rapid). Nakamura placed first in the Opening Blitz earning the use of the white pieces in three of the five rounds of the first section of the actual tournament, the round robin rapid event where he placed equal first alongside Anand. Nakamura playing the black pieces three times in the second section of the event, the Zurich Chess Challenge (Blitz) (2016), again placed equal first with Anand to tie the overall score, but won on tiebreak to take first prize.

He has authored the book Bullet Chess: One Minute to Mate.

Matches

In December 2004, Nakamura played the best-of-six game Karjakin - Nakamura Match (2004) in the "Duelo de los Jovenes Prodigios" (Duel of the Wonder Boys) in Cuernavaca, Estado de Morelos, Mexico, winning 4.5-1.5 (+4 -1 =1). In May 2011 at the St Louis chess club, he won the Nakamura - Ponomariov Match (2011) by 3.5-2.5 (+2 =3 -1). In June 2014, he played for the Cez Trophy Navara - Nakamura Match (2014) in Praha, Czechia, which involved a 4-game standard time match against David Navara. He won the match by 3.5-0.5.

960 Chess

In August 2009, Nakamura defeated Aronian in Mainz, Germany to become the 960 world champion and remained unchallenged as such until Carlsen defeated him in a match in February 2018 by a margin of 14-10.

Ratings and rankings

Nakamura's highest ranking as a Junior (U20) was #3 in April 2004 and 2005. He first broke into the world's top 100 in October 2004 when he was still 16 years old, and has remained in the top 100 continuously since that time. He reached the world's top 10 in January 2011, and has remained in that elite group continuously since January 2013. In September 2015 his rating reached 2814 despite which he was still ranked world #4 behind Carlsen, Anand and Topalov respectively. However in October 2016, his ranking reached its highest point so far, 2816, when his ranking was world #2, his highest ranking so far.

Sources and references

(1) Wikipedia article: FIDE Grand Prix 2012–2013 (2) http://dod.ru/chess/game/Crest/Smal...; (3) Further details are at this post: Hikaru Nakamura; (4) https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast... (podcast interview by Ben Johnson through iTunes); Live rating list: http://www.2700chess.com/; Wikipedia article: Hikaru Nakamura

Last updated: 2024-04-14 20:46:42

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 157; games 1-25 of 3,902  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. S Predescu vs Nakamura 1-0641995U.S. National Scholastic Grade 2 ChampionshipB08 Pirc, Classical
2. L Au vs Nakamura 1-0431997Hawaii opB83 Sicilian
3. Nakamura vs J Bonin 1-0361997Marshall Chess ClubC02 French, Advance
4. J Kleinman vs Nakamura  ½-½411997January CongressA49 King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4
5. Nakamura vs B Karen 0-1521997Nassau FuturityB06 Robatsch
6. A Bisguier vs Nakamura 0-1211998Somerset ACN Action SwissE70 King's Indian
7. B Karen vs Nakamura  0-1261998Nassau g/30B23 Sicilian, Closed
8. A Stripunsky vs Nakamura 0-1431998Marshall Chess ClubB40 Sicilian
9. P MacIntyre vs Nakamura  1-0541998US Amateur Team EastA07 King's Indian Attack
10. J Thinnsen vs Nakamura 1-035199899th US OpenA45 Queen's Pawn Game
11. Nakamura vs I Krush 1-062199899th US OpenB67 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...a6 Defense, 8...Bd7
12. S Kriventsov vs Nakamura  1-0241999Rated TournamentB80 Sicilian, Scheveningen
13. Nakamura vs J Fang 0-12119998th Eastern Class ChampionshipsB73 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
14. A David vs Nakamura  1-025199927th World OpenB92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
15. Nakamura vs W Paschall  ½-½251999North Bay OpenB65 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...Be7 Defense, 9...Nxd4
16. J Hebert vs Nakamura  1-0601999North Bay OpenE97 King's Indian
17. Nakamura vs V Rajlich  1-0521999North Bay OpenB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
18. G Taylor vs Nakamura  1-0311999North Bay OpenE75 King's Indian, Averbakh, Main line
19. Nakamura vs F Baragar  0-1451999North Bay OpenC17 French, Winawer, Advance
20. M Stroud vs Nakamura  0-1371999North Bay OpenE92 King's Indian
21. S Glinert vs Nakamura  ½-½381999North Bay OpenA07 King's Indian Attack
22. D Moody vs Nakamura 0-1201999100th US OpenB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
23. Nakamura vs A Aleksandrov ½-½601999100th US OpenC45 Scotch Game
24. A Wojtkiewicz vs Nakamura 1-0421999100th US OpenE62 King's Indian, Fianchetto
25. Nakamura vs G Gaiffe 1-0541999100th US OpenB23 Sicilian, Closed
 page 1 of 157; games 1-25 of 3,902  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Nakamura wins | Nakamura loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 275 OF 858 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-15-09  timhortons: http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/t...

After the opening ceremony, which was held last Friday, Sergei Tiviakov walked over to his townsman Sipke Ernst, his opponent in the last round, and offered him a draw. Ernst accepted, but then Tiviakov added that he could’t play on Sunday, because he had to play in the Croatian league on Monday. Ernst suggested him to contact the arbiter, which Tiviakov did. At that point the arbiter and tournament director didn’t object (yet).

After the third round (Tiviakov had drawn with Bitalzadeh, lost to Swinkels and beaten Miedema)< the organizers told him that they couldn’t allow it. As stated in the players’ contract, which was signed by Tiviakov, all participants have to attend the opening, closing and all rounds. If he wouldn’t appear in the playing hall, his game would be declared lost by default. >Tiviakov immediately decided to withdraw from the tournament, which thus lost its top seeded player.

<i put this topic on naka page because of its relation on nakas tournament at world open where he say an early bye.

do tiviakov has no way of saying an early bye here because hes pressed hard by his next scheduled tournament? did naka at world open signed a contract that he should be around by the tournament area until the closing ceremony?

tiviakov is here in montreal last few weeks ago, and amazing his number of tournament...>

Sep-15-09  timhortons: i will repost mal kibitz about nakas world open..

Jul-07-09
Donostia Chess Festival (2009)
malthrope: <brankat: Nakamura didn't do all that well in Philadelphia, World Open, only a couple of days ago.> Actually, Naka did just fine! :)) He played 7 games scoring 6/7 (two draws with GM's Leonid G Yudasin & Ilya Smirin and he beat the eventual co-winner Evgeny Najer with the Black pieces). As he is scheduled to play in this Donostia Chess Festival (2009) tourney, he took a half-point bye for each round not played. In the end this was good enough to tie for 1st Place overall with GM Evgeny Najer. However, since by this time he was on a plane to the San Sebestian tourney, thus Najer was awarded the title as no Naka - no tiebreak games could be played to determine the 'World Open' winner. As <whiskeyrebel> phrased it, <"Ladies and gentlemen, Hikaru has left the building".> ~lol~ Not to shabby I'd say and he's as ready as he'll ever be! ;) Your pal, - Mal

Sep-15-09  Prugno: <tim> Sorry but this makes no sense. In a closed event, such as the Dutch Championship, a bye is a contradiction in terms: either there is an odd number of players, and in that case every player in turn will have a rest day, or they are even (the normal case), and in that case the pairings are fixed before the event even starts, and cannot be changed by "taking a bye". If my opponent is absent for any given round, I just get a free extra point on the scoreboard, and vice versa.

In Open events, on the other hand, the pairings are not known in advance, so a bye has no particular influence on the course of the event.

(Personally, I don't think half-point byes should be allowed in Open Swiss events either, and whoever skips a round should get 0 points on that day, but that's a topic for another discussion).

Sep-15-09  timhortons: Prugno....thanks that clears it up
Sep-15-09  timhortons: theres an agreement before hand that they well make things easy for tiviakov as he got prior commitments.somebody must have make things hard for tiviakov.
Sep-15-09  frogbert: <I do wish that Carlsen was a little more forthcoming on matters like this. >

what do you mean? i'm not sure what you want to know! :o)

Sep-15-09  frogbert: <is this a fide rated event? just asking?>

i don't know. didn't they play some of this over the internet last year, or am i mixing it up with some college/university league?

but if it's rated, i want to rate it, so please find out, anyone!

Sep-15-09  frogbert: <Still only Kasparov, Topalov, Kramnik and Anand that have reached 2800. Maybe 2-3 players more will reach it the upcoming 3-5 years, but it won't be easy...>

every 2700-player can reach 2800 and even 2850. as long as the 400-limit exists (previously the 350-limit).

one simply has to play <many> <very weak> opponents, and your rating will go up by 0,8 points for every game you play. of course, if you would happen to shed a draw against a fide-rated 1700 player (impossible for a 2700+ i think) you need another 6 wins to compensate the rating loss (-4,2 + 6 * 0,8 = + 0,6).

if naka would climb back to 2730, he could simply schedule 100 games against sub 2000 players. with a 6-man round robin of 5 games every weekend, that's "only" 20 weeks - less than half a year.

i expect him to score 100% in hundred such games, and hence 6 months later he's 2730 + 80 = 2810. mission accomplished. it would be impressive not to become a <worse> player due to 20 such weekends, though. :o)

Sep-15-09  timhortons: <frogbert>
ill post here if i get some news about it.

<goin back to tiviakov argument that maze and bacrot was givin a chance by montreal organizer not to attend the opening ceremony>

yes!

tiviakov was right, the game of maze and bluvshtien was arraign at 12 noon last day of tournament as well as bacrot -kovalyov game, maze bluvshtien was an early draw while bacrot-kovalyov was a hard fought draw, i witness it from first move to last move as i hang around the site and i smell something fishy why bacrot-kovalyov/maze bluvhstien game as played before its proper schedule..

id theres somebody here from quebec and know the scheduling and want to correct me if im wrong then i would be happy for it.

Sep-15-09  timhortons: http://www.echecsmontreal.ca/pairin...

if you check the chess federation website it say 2 pm last round while in actual 2 game was held in advance at 12 noon, i smell something fishy here, i was thinking then somebody must have ask the federation some consideration and i first assume it bluvhstien, hehe , i must be wrong...

now montreal organizers must not be a very hard people and very considerate one and this type of people is expected by tiviakov to give him a break.

schedule is change, as long nobody complain everybody can go home happy....

sorry guys i started the tiviakov issue here and ill close it now, just for the record im posting my opinion on this issue as tiviakov himself sited the quebec chess federation as not very hard guys when it comes to scheduling.

Sep-15-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <froggie>

I don't know, its just hard to read him from his abreviated interviews, this may be because he has always travelled with his father and been shielded somewhat from the media.

Does he sweat? What does he like or dislike in this world? What would he be if not a chessplayer? His interviews seem devoid of anything that might raise an eyebrow. Theres nothing wrong with that, but if he makes the next big step and beats Anand or Topy in a match he will be under even more scrutiny.

Sep-16-09  ycbaywtb: <one simply has to play <many> <very weak> opponents, and your rating will go up by 0,8 points for every game you play.> and then there's always that possibility that you just play good players such as yourself or higher rated, but that you outshine them at the time, and pick up solid rating points, seems like ivanchuk went on a recent tear and gained like 56 or something, and even topalov probably rose alot the last 18 to 24 months, so Nak has more than 1 way to skin this cat
Sep-16-09  percyblakeney: <every 2700-player can reach 2800 and even 2850. as long as the 400-limit exists (previously the 350-limit)>

Yes, it's not too hard if they use the Vallejo method of reaching 2700, but otherwise it will be tough. In the 20 years since Kasparov reached 2800 only three other players have reached 2790 on an official rating list. My guess is two more 2800 players before year 2014.

Sep-16-09  VinnyRoo2002: I disagree that Nakamura would go 100-0 against 1700 FIDE rated players under tournament time controls. There's obviously no way to prove this minus him actually playing 100 games against 1700 FIDE rated players, but Nakamura does have a history of giving up draws or even losses to players he shouldn't.
Sep-16-09  frogbert: <There's obviously no way to prove this minus him actually playing 100 games against 1700 FIDE rated players>

as long as naka would be able to keep his concentration reasonably up, i really can't imagine him losing a game to a fide 1700 rated player. if you have 1700 fide, that corresponds roughly to 1300-1500 in the norwegian rating system - and that was the level i started at when i first joined a chess club when i was 20. (in norway, people have national ratings all the way down to 500, talented sub-10 year olds typically have first ratings between 600 and 800 - several norwegian gms started with ratings like that!)

a draw is very unlikely, too - but then, it's compensated by 6 more wins or one more week with games, if you will.

so i think he'd make 2800 this way, if he'd tried. i seriously hope nobody ever will, though... :o)

Sep-16-09  whiskeyrebel: Only a cheap jackass would try to make 2800 that way. Naka is too ballsy and too much a real chessplayer with respect for the game to pull anything like that. I think we are all in agreement about that.
Sep-16-09  timhortons: <frogbert>

Id tried to ask at icc last night if US chess league is fide rated and i got an answer from icc chess helper jfernandez which say "no".

i just cant find a line at uschessleague website which say that ,that tourney is not fide rated.

Sep-16-09  timhortons: naka once again play some games at icc last night, i know earlier he examined some games, but didnt know he would play a game later.

he just cant get away with icc and i hope he dont mind people saying things about icc.

the usual crowd of naka observer would assemble if nakamura is present, almost 200 of them, discussion would range from superman, religeon, kingkong, britney and tate..the usual icc members that kibitz in un usual way un matched in any website...

there sometimes you will see some GM blow his tough over certain argument with a patzer or one GM engage in an argument with another GM or IM,I remember one shoot a question if what is the definition of an IM and somebody kibitz " poor GM" endless argument would ensue and all would stop once naka log out.

Sep-16-09  frogbert: <Naka is too ballsy and too much a real chessplayer with respect for the game to pull anything like that.>

sure, no disagreement there. i was simply illustrating why a given rating number - no matter if 2800 or 2700 - doesn't say everything under <any> circumstances. you can't read how a certain number for a player came into existence simply by looking at the number - and the number itself doesn't say anything about variance, if the player is likely to be at a temporary peak or a temporary bottom, and so on.

the "one-dimenstional" (scalar) value simply can't hold all that information, while someone who follows elite chess closely might be able to supply better interpretations and more real information.

Sep-16-09  SetNoEscapeOn: <percyblakeney: My guess is two more 2800 players before year 2014.>

Carlsen and Aronian? I think that's in the cards. In fact, if he had three more elite tournaments coming up soon, I think Aronian would cross the mark this year.

I wonder if Kramnik, Anand, or both will be able to break 2800 again.

Sep-17-09  ycbaywtb: the way the old 'barrier' of 2700 has been thrashed by countless GM's these days, i have no doubt something similar will happen to the current 'barrier' of 2800, and Nak seems a perfect candidate to be one such thrasher
Sep-17-09  percyblakeney: <Carlsen and Aronian?>

Yes, hard to see any other immediate threat to the 2800 barrier at the moment. Going from 2700 to 2750 is tough, and the next 50 even tougher. Leko passed 2700 ten years ago and has been around 2750 the last five years, with an all time high in 2005. Radjabov has also been stable around 2750 for a few years now. Grischuk passed 2700 seven years ago but has not reached 2750 yet.

Sep-17-09  frogbert: <the way the old 'barrier' of 2700 has been thrashed by countless GM's these days, i have no doubt something similar will happen to the current 'barrier' of 2800>

oh, there's one important thing you seem to forget here: the rating system is a <relative> system, meaning that the really significant and unchanging thing (over time) is how a <difference in rating> corresponds to a <difference in scoring "expectation">.

what some of the more nonsensical (in my opinion) "inflation measures" seem to completely ignore, is that the rating of the number one player(s) in the world has <not> shot upwards, or "inflated" during the last 10 years. not at all, actually.

kasparov himself was at 2851 in 1999/2000, but he dropped to 2812 before he retired. he was even down to 2804 before his last event. excuses for nerves and emotions aside, there was no significant (in terms of the inherent error margins of the rating system) difference between the kind of performances topalov delivered in 2005 and those we saw from kasparov in his last 5 active years, and the performances of topalov in the last 12 months have been comparable to those of his "golden year" 2005.

what is the <real> difference between 2009 and say 2004? (in april 2004 kasparov was number 1 with a rating of 2817)

in april 2004 there were 10 players within 100 points of number one kasparov, with a 2817 rating.

in september 2009 the number one rated player topalov is at 2813 - essentially <the same absolute number> as kasparov in 2004 - and topalov's performances 12 months prior to his 2009 2813 number don't look notably less impressive than kasparov's performances prior to his april 2004 2817 rating.

the big difference is that within 100 points of topalov (in september 2009), there are 24 players - 2,5 times as many as were within kasparov's equivalent rating in 2004.

what does that mean? does these 24 players need to perform less well to keep such a rating, compared to 5 years ago? maybe, maybe not - it depends on your point of view.

one thing <is> certain though: if pitted against other 2700+ players, or against the current top 5 in the world, including topalov, the current "top 100 rating points players" need to score <exactly as good against topalov & co> as the 10 "top 100 rating points players" had to do against kasparov & co back in 2004, <in order to keep their rating>.

a 100 point rating difference is still a 100 point rating difference in terms of score expectancy, and a 50 point difference is still a 50 point difference.

put a different way, if a "new" 2700-player is able to hold his own against the best players, he's as good as his rating says. only by playing <directly against> say the top 5 players we get a confirmation that he's really that close to them in playing strength as his rating indicates. your rating only says something about how you compare to the "kind of" players you typically play.

hence, someone being very good at people around 2650 might experience that his rating is pushed "too close" to the rating of the near 2800 guys to be descriptive of how he would fare against them.

looking at a player like leko, he was 70-75 points behind the number one player in 2004, while in 2009 he's only about 50 points behind topalov. <maybe> he's become better, or simply the difference between number one topalov and leko is less than the difference was between kasparov and leko. how can we tell?

well, we can't, for sure, but we can observe that in april 2004, leko was about 25 points below kramnik and 35 points below anand. in the latest live list (which is lagging a bit behind these days), leko is about 10 points behind kramnik and about 25 behind anand. hence, relatively he has gained a little on those two (for some reason), about 10 points in this sampling, so at least it's not obvious that the 2760-rated leko of september 2009 is a relatively weaker player than the 2740-rated leko of april 2007. he's probably about the same strength, possibly a bit stronger, although theoretically he can also be a bit weaker - but he <is> closer to number one than he was in 2004.

do the top 3 players in 2009 perform weaker than the top 3 did in april 2004? well - it's anybody's guess. but the rating of the number one chess player is <not> going through the roof - but more people are within "striking distance". in a 10 game match, topalov is supposed to beat a 2713-rated player 6,5 - 3,5 - so measured against topalov, naka has proven his 2713 rating if he wins one, draws 5 and loses 4 games in a 10 game match. the same deal was on for gelfand (2714) and kasparov (2817) in 2004 ...

Sep-17-09  timhortons: i will just insert here naka game last night

[Event "ICC 75 30 u"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2009.09.16"]
[Round "-"]
[White "Barcenilla-ARZ"]
[Black "Nakamura-SEA"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ICCResult "White resigns"]
[WhiteElo "2583"]
[BlackElo "2759"]
[Opening "Réti opening"]
[ECO "A04"]
[NIC "EO.48"]
[Time "21:02:23"]
[TimeControl "4500+30"]

1. Nf3 b6 2. g3 Bb7 3. Bg2 c5 4. O-O g6 5. c4 Bg7 6. Nc3 Nf6 7. b3 d5 8. cxd5 Nxd5 9. Bb2 Nc6 10. Qc1 Nc7 11. Nb5 e5 12. Nxc7+ Qxc7 13. Bc3 O-O 14. d3 Rfe8 15. Rb1 Rac8 16. Qb2 b5 17. Qd2 Rcd8 18. Qc1 Qb6 19. Qc2 Nd4 20. Bxd4 cxd4 21. Qd2 Rc8 22. Rbc1 Rc3 23. e3 e4 24. Nxd4 Rxd3 25. Qb4 Bxd4 26. exd4 Rxd4 27. Qc5 Qxc5 28. Rxc5 Rc8 29. Re5 a6 30. Re7 Bd5 31. Rd7 Rd3 32. Rd6 a5 33. Rb6 Rc5 34. Re1 f5 35. g4 Kf7 36. gxf5 gxf5 37. Bf1 Rd2 38. Bxb5 e3 39. fxe3 Rcc2 40. Bf1 Rxh2 White resigns 0-1

Sep-17-09  timhortons: <1.b3 youre joking....>

[Event "ICC 60 30 u"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2009.09.08"]
[Round "-"]
[White "Nakamura-SEA"]
[Black "Kacheishvili-NY"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ICCResult "Black resigns"]
[WhiteElo "2759"]
[BlackElo "2666"]
[Opening "Nimzovich-Larsen attack: classical variation"] [ECO "A01"]
[NIC "VO.08"]
[Time "21:02:08"]
[TimeControl "3600+30"]

1. b3 d5 2. Bb2 c5 3. e3 Nf6 4. Nf3 g6 5. Bxf6 exf6 6. c3 Bd6 7. d4 O-O 8. Nbd2 Be6 9. a3 f5 10. c4 Nc6 11. dxc5 Bxc5 12. b4 Be7 13. c5 Bf6 14. Rc1 d4 15. Bc4 dxe3 16. fxe3 Re8 17. O-O Ne5 18. Nxe5 Bxe5 19. Bxe6 Rxe6 20. Qc2 Qc7 21. Nf3 Bg7 22. Rfe1 Rae8 23. Qa4 Qe7 24. Kh1 Rxe3 25. h3 Bc3 26. Rxe3 Qxe3 27. Rxc3 ♗lack resigns 1-0

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 858)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 275 OF 858 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC