chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Hikaru Nakamura
Nakamura 
 

Number of games in database: 3,914
Years covered: 1995 to 2025
Last FIDE rating: 2804 (2734 rapid, 2837 blitz)
Highest rating achieved in database: 2816
Overall record: +593 -246 =724 (61.1%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 2351 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (272) 
    B90 B30 B23 B51 B42
 Ruy Lopez (172) 
    C65 C67 C78 C77 C84
 Reti System (148) 
    A06 A04 A05
 Queen's Gambit Declined (119) 
    D37 D31 D38 D30 D35
 Queen's Pawn Game (115) 
    A45 D00 D02 E10 D05
 Grunfeld (77) 
    D85 D70 D78 D91 D80
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (251) 
    B90 B30 B80 B22 B92
 Ruy Lopez (247) 
    C67 C65 C70 C78 C72
 Queen's Gambit Declined (156) 
    D37 D31 D30 D06 D39
 Queen's Pawn Game (123) 
    D02 A45 A40 A41 A46
 King's Indian (114) 
    E97 E90 E92 E94 E63
 Giuoco Piano (107) 
    C53 C50 C54
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Krasenkow vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Gelfand vs Nakamura, 2010 0-1
   Rybka vs Nakamura, 2008 0-1
   So vs Nakamura, 2015 0-1
   G Sagalchik vs Nakamura, 2003 0-1
   Crafty vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Nakamura vs Karjakin, 2004 1-0
   Nakamura vs Kramnik, 2012 1-0
   A Beliavsky vs Nakamura, 2009 0-1
   Nakamura vs J W Loyte, 2001 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Corsica Masters (2007)
   Trophee CCAS (2008)
   Magnus Carlsen Invitational (2020)
   Bullet Chess Championship (2023)
   Meltwater Tour Final (2021)
   Chess.com Speed Chess Championship 2017/18 (2017)
   Ordix Open (2009)
   Magnus Carlsen Chess Tour Finals (2020)
   chess.com Speed Chess (2020)
   New In Chess Classic (2021)
   Tata Steel India (2022)
   Chess.com SpeedChess Finals (2024)
   Champions Showdown (2019)
   Pro Chess League (2018)
   PRO League Group Stage (2019)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Naka's Nook Mistook Fredthebear stan theo by fredthebear
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 212 by 0ZeR0
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 243 by 0ZeR0
   Notable Nakamura Games by caracas1970
   book: Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by Baby Hawk
   Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by kenilworthian
   Vid e o put Fredthebear in th is cent ury by fredthebear
   Notable Nakamura Games by iron maiden
   2020 The Corona Beer & Black Bears Matter Mo Ode by fredthebear
   Hikaru! by larrewl
   Match Nakamura! by docjan
   Match Nakamura! by amadeus

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 Norway Chess
   Nakamura vs D Gukesh (Jun-03-25) ,
   Carlsen vs Nakamura (Jun-02-25) 1-0, armageddon
   Carlsen vs Nakamura (Jun-02-25) 1/2-1/2
   Nakamura vs Caruana (Jun-01-25) 1/2-1/2
   Nakamura vs Caruana (Jun-01-25) 1/2-1/2, armageddon

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Hikaru Nakamura
Search Google for Hikaru Nakamura
FIDE player card for Hikaru Nakamura

HIKARU NAKAMURA
(born Dec-09-1987, 37 years old) Japan (federation/nationality United States of America)

[what is this?]

IM (2001); GM (2003). Hikaru Nakamura won the US Championship in 2004, 2009, 2012, 2015 and 2019. He was the world's second-ranked player as of October 2015. In July 2023, he married WGM Atousa Pourkashiyan.

Prodigy

Christopher Hikaru Nakamura was born December 9, 1987 in Hirakata in Osaka, Japan, to a Japanese father and an American mother. He is the younger brother of Asuka Nakamura. When he was two years old, he and his mother and brother moved to the United States. He started playing chess when he was seven, coached by his stepfather, Sunil Weeramantry. He was the youngest player in US history to defeat an International Master (Jay Bonin) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 0 months), to become a National Master (USCF) (10 years, 79 days), to defeat a Grandmaster (Arthur Bisguier) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 117 days), and to become an IM (13 years, 2 months), although most of these records have subsequently been surpassed. In 2003 he became the USA's youngest-ever grandmaster (15 years, 2 months and 19 days), a record later broken by Fabiano Caruana and Ray Robson.

Championships

<Youth> In 2001 he won the World U14 championship.

<National> When he won the Chessmaster US Championship 2005 (2004) (on tiebreak from Alexander Stripunsky), he was the youngest player to win the US championship since Robert James Fischer. He also won the US Championship (2009) outright by half a point ahead of the joint runners-up Robert Hess and Alexander Onischuk, and the United States Championship (2012) outright by a full point ahead of the winner of the 2010 and 2011 events, Gata Kamsky. He won the national title for a fourth time when he took out the US Championship (2015) with 8/11, half a point ahead of the outright runner up Ray Robson.

<World championship cycle> Seeded number 87 and aged 16, Nakamura reached the final 16 in the FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004), defeating 46th seed Sergey Volkov, 19th seeded Aleksej Aleksandrov, and 51st seed Alexander Lastin in the preliminary rounds before bowing out to number 3 seed and finalist Michael Adams in the round of 16. He qualified to play in the World Cup (2013) through his rating, and defeated Peruvian WGM Deysi Estela Cori Tello in the first round, Azeri GM Eltaj Safarli in the second round and Indian GM Baskaran Adhiban in the third round, but was eliminated in the Round of 16 (fourth round) by Ukrainian GM Anton Korobov. He qualified by rating to participate in the World Cup (2015), and is doing so although he has already qualified for the Candidates Tournament of 2016 via the Grand Prix series of 2014-15. He defeated Richmond Phiri, Sam Shankland in the first two rounds, as well as Ian Nepomniachtchi in a third round thriller that Nakamura won in the deciding Armageddon blitz tiebreaker game after the three previous sets of rapid and blitz tiebreakers had been drawn. In the Round of 16 (the fourth round) he won against Michael Adams by 1.5-0.5 but lost to Pavel Eljanov in the quarter final, bowing out of the event.

<Grand Prix Series 2012-2013> He started the Grand Prix series with last at the FIDE Grand Prix London (2012). After bouncing back into contention with outright second in the FIDE Grand Prix Zug (2013), a poor showing at the FIDE Grand Prix Thessaloniki (2013) eliminated him from contention for the top 2 spots that would have qualified him for the 2014 Candidates Tournament. (1) He did however place 3rd behind Fabiano Caruana and Boris Gelfand in the FIDE Grand Prix Paris (2013) to accumulate 300 GP points and place 6th in the 2012-13 Grand Prix series. Subsequently, his only chance to play in the 2014 Candidates Tournament was to be nominated as the Organizer's wild card once the venue was settled, however this did not eventuate.

<Grand Prix Series 2014-2015> Nakamura competed in the first leg of the series at the FIDE Grand Prix Baku (2014), where he scored 6/11 to place 3rd-7th, half a point behind the joint leaders Caruana and Gelfand. He therefore kicked off with a GP tally of 82 points, representing the even distribution of points applicable to each place from 3rd to 7th. In the second leg of the series, namely the FIDE Grand Prix Tashkent (2014), he placed =2nd and stood in 2nd place overall, excellently situated to take advantage of the opportunity to qualify for the Candidates tournament in 2016. He took full advantage of this in FIDE Grand Prix Khanty-Mansiysk (2015), when he came =1st to qualify for the Candidates Tournament of 2016.

Standard tournaments

In 2005, he won the 7th Foxwoods Open (2005).

In 2007, he won both the National Open (2007) that was held in Las Vegas and the Casino de Barcelona (2007).

The following year, he beat Xiangzhi Bu in the play-off to win the Gibraltar Masters (2008) Masters Open with 8.0/10.

Nakamura tied for first with Evgeny Najer at the 37th World Open (2009) after taking two last-day byes, each worth half a point and won the Donostia Chess Festival (2009) in tiebreak over Ruslan Ponomariov.

In 2010, he came =4th at Corus Group A (2010), and was equal top scorer in the victorious Rising Stars team in the Rising Stars - Experience (2010) tournament. He scored 5/9 (+1 -0 =8) at the Tal Memorial (2010), placing =4th, and finished the year with =4th place in the London Chess Classic (2010).

Nakamura began 2011 by taking clear first place at the A-Group of the prestigious category 20 Tata Steel Group A (2011) (formerly Corus) with a 9/13 score (+6 -1 =6) and a 2880 performance rating, ahead of a powerful field including the world's top four players: World Champion Viswanathan Anand, Magnus Carlsen, Levon Aronian and former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik. In June 2011, Nakamura placed =3rd in the Bazna King's Tournament (2011), in July he scored 4.5/10 at Dortmund Sparkassen (2011), in August he came =1st in the 2011 US Open Championship with 7.5/9 and in October he came =3rd in the Grand Slam Chess Final (2011) with 5/10. The following month, he suffered a lapse in form at the category 22 Tal Memorial (2011), scoring 3/9 and coming last but recovered to finish 2011 with second place behind Kramnik at the category 20 London Chess Classic (2011), scoring +4 -1 =3 (TPR of 2887).

He started 2012 by coming =2nd (4th on count back) at the Reggio Emilia (2011), half a point behind Anish Giri, and then came =5th at Tata Steel Group A (2012), scoring 7.5/13 (+3 -1 =9). He followed up in April 2012 with 1st at the 6th Annual Grand Pacific Open held in British Columbia. He competed in the Tal Memorial (2012) held in June, scoring 4/9. In July/August 2012, Nakamura placed a solid =3rd at the Biel Chess Festival (2012), but underperformed at the European Club Cup (2012), although in October 2012, he recovered to some extent by winning the 4 player double round robin 16th Unive Tournament (2012) (crown group) with 4.5/6 (+3 -0 =3). Nakamura finished 2012 with a strong 3rd placement in the London Chess Classic (2012) behind Carlsen and Kramnik, adding enough rating points to restore him to the top 10.

2013 started with a modest 7/13 result for outright 6th at the Tata Steel Group A (2013) event. He then followed up in May 2013 with equal 2nd at the Norway Chess (2013) with 5.5/9, half a point behind Sergey Karjakin and 3rd on tiebreak behind Carlsen; he also placed =2nd with 6/9 at the preliminary Norway Chess (Blitz) (2013) held to determine the draw for the main tournament, and earned the right to play with the White pieces in 5 games out of 9. In June 2013, he contested the category 22 Tal Memorial (2013), and was outright leader after 6 rounds. However, he lost the last 3 game to place 6th with 4.5/9, winning more games (4) and losing more games (4) than any other player in the tournament. Soon after, he came =3rd in the Houston Open in July 2013. In September he played in the quadrangular double round robin category 22 Sinquefield Cup (2013), and was in contention for first place until the last round, when he drew against Gata Kamsky finishing second with 3.5/6 (+2 -1 =3; TPR 2863) behind Magnus Carlsen.

Nakamura's first event in 2014 was the category 20 Tata Steel Masters (2014) where he scored 5/11 (+2 -3 =6) to shed a few rating points for FIDE's February rating list. He next competed in the category 23 Zurich Chess Challenge (2014) in which he placed 4th with 2/5 after coming agonisingly close to defeating World Champion Magnus Carlsen. He came 2nd with 3.5/5 in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2014) which followed the standard time event, to remain in 4th in the overall event with the results of the standard and rapid events combined. In April, he participated in the inaugural Gashimov Memorial (2014), a category XXII 6-player DRR event inaugurated in honor of the late Azeri grandmaster, scoring 5/10 and placing =3rd behind Carlsen and Caruana. At the London Chess Classic (2014), he scored 2.5/5 to place 4th.

Nakamura's start to 2015 was to win the powerful Gibraltar Masters (2015) with 8.5/10 (+7 =3), and return a PB on his live rating and his new FIDE rating due in March. Despite cracking the 2800 barrier in the live ratings during the RR category 22 Zurich Chess Challenge (2015) held in February, he placed outright 2nd in the standard portion of the event behind Anand, ahead of Kramnik, Karjakin, Aronian and Caruana respectively. His second place in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2015) with 3/5 made him =1st with Anand in the overall event, but he won an Armageddon tiebreaker with the former World Champion to win first prize. His good form continued at the category 22 Norway Chess (2015) event, where he was undefeated to place =2nd (3rd on a narrow SB tiebreak), behind Topalov and alongside Anand with 6/9 and a TPR of 2900. In September he competed in the second leg of the inaugural Grand Chess Tour at Sinquefield Cup (2015), and finished equal second with 5/9 behind Aronian in what amounted to a par for rating performance. October saw Nakamura compete in the lucrative Millionaire Chess (2015) tournament, which he won after battling through a complicated tiebreak system that involved a playoff to decide a playoff for fourth, and then winning a knockout rapid game semi-final that was called after round 7 of 9 of the main standard time event. He finished the year with a poor performance at the London Chess Classic (2015) where he came in toward the bottom of the field after scoring 4/9.

He started 2016 with an upbeat result at the Gibraltar Masters (2016), winning first prize after a rapid and blitz game tiebreak that ended in an Armageddon victory against runner-up Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. He finished clear second at the
FIDE Grand Swiss (2023), scoring 8/11 (+5 =6 -0) and qualifying for the 2024 Candidates tournament.

Team Events

<Olympiads> Nakamura has represented the U.S. in the Olympiads of 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2014, helping his country to the bronze medal in 2006 and 2008. He scored 6/10 during the Khanty-Mansiysk Olympiad (2010) on top board for the USA and a performance rating of 2741 and 6/9 in the Istanbul Olympiad (2012), coming in fourth on top board. His overall score in Olympiads is 31 points accumulated in 49 games played.

<World Team Championship> Nakamura played board 1 for the USA at the World Team Championship (2010), scoring individual gold and team silver. He also played top board at the World Team Championship (2013), winning individual silver and helping his team to 4th place in the event.

<European Club Cup> He played top board for the SK Husek Vienna in the European Club Cup (2009) and top board for the Italian club Obiettivo Risarcimento Padova in 2012 and 2013, second board for the Italian club in 2014 and board 3 for the same club in 2015. He scored individual bronze in 2013 and 2014.

Rapids

Nakamura is one of the world's best rapid and blitz players, and the world's best bullet (one-minute) player. He regularly plays on the internet, usually at the ICC where he is the highest rated player (userid <Smallville>), and at Playchess, where he is known as <Star Wars>. He has set many rating records under different categories. In 2008, he challenged and broke blitz king Alexander Grischuk 's record at ICC of 3737, reaching 3750. Grischuk subsequently challenged Nakamura to a 20 game 3 minutes blitz match, which Nakamura took out convincingly by 14.5-5.5. (2) He also won the first ICC Open in 2011 ahead of over 2000 other contestants. (3)

In 2007, he won the annual Corsica Masters (2007), defeating Rustam Kasimdzhanov in the final. One of the most convincing demonstrations of Nakamura's ability as a rapid player was when he won the Trophee CCAS (2008), defeating Xiangzhi Bu, Anatoly Karpov and Vasyl Ivanchuk in the playoff matches to take first prize in a field that included Carlsen. Nakamura also defeated Carlsen to take out the BNbank Blitz (2009). He was runner-up to Ivanchuk at the Cap d'Agde (2010) in the playoff. He also defeated Rising Stars team mate Anish Giri for the right to play at Amber 2011.

In 2012, Nakamura won the trifecta of silver medals at the SportAccord World Mind Games (Men's Rapid) (2012), the World Mind Games (Men's Blitz) and the World Mind Games (Men's Blindfold) events. He closed out 2013 by winning the London Chess Classic (Knockout) (2013), defeating Gelfand in the final by 1.5-0.5, after qualifying for the final by winning the preliminary London Chess Classic (Group C) (2013).

In June 2014, he competed in both the World Rapid Championship (2014) and the World Blitz Championship (2014) that were held in Dubai. In the former, he scored a relatively meager 8.5/15, losing 40 rapid rating points, while he was much more successful in the latter, scoring 16/21, being the runner up by a point behind the winner Magnus Carlsen. His blitz rating skyrocketed to over 2900. Subsequently he competed in the Super Rapidplay Open that was a companion event to the 2014 London Classic (see above), winning the event with an almost perfect score of 9.5/10. He also competed in the London Elite Player Blitz that was the other companion event, and placed =1st with 6/10.

The 2016 edition of the Zurich Chess Challenge was a two-part event, which kicked off with a preliminary Zurich Chess Challenge (Opening Blitz) (2016) to determine who had three whites in the five rounds of the Zurich Chess Challenge (2016) (rapid). Nakamura placed first in the Opening Blitz earning the use of the white pieces in three of the five rounds of the first section of the actual tournament, the round robin rapid event where he placed equal first alongside Anand. Nakamura playing the black pieces three times in the second section of the event, the Zurich Chess Challenge (Blitz) (2016), again placed equal first with Anand to tie the overall score, but won on tiebreak to take first prize.

He has authored the book Bullet Chess: One Minute to Mate.

Matches

In December 2004, Nakamura played the best-of-six game Karjakin - Nakamura Match (2004) in the "Duelo de los Jovenes Prodigios" (Duel of the Wonder Boys) in Cuernavaca, Estado de Morelos, Mexico, winning 4.5-1.5 (+4 -1 =1). In May 2011 at the St Louis chess club, he won the Nakamura - Ponomariov Match (2011) by 3.5-2.5 (+2 =3 -1). In June 2014, he played for the Cez Trophy Navara - Nakamura Match (2014) in Praha, Czechia, which involved a 4-game standard time match against David Navara. He won the match by 3.5-0.5.

960 Chess

In August 2009, Nakamura defeated Aronian in Mainz, Germany to become the 960 world champion and remained unchallenged as such until Carlsen defeated him in a match in February 2018 by a margin of 14-10.

Ratings and rankings

Nakamura's highest ranking as a Junior (U20) was #3 in April 2004 and 2005. He first broke into the world's top 100 in October 2004 when he was still 16 years old, and has remained in the top 100 continuously since that time. He reached the world's top 10 in January 2011, and has remained in that elite group continuously since January 2013. In September 2015 his rating reached 2814 despite which he was still ranked world #4 behind Carlsen, Anand and Topalov respectively. However in October 2016, his ranking reached its highest point so far, 2816, when his ranking was world #2, his highest ranking so far.

Sources and references

(1) Wikipedia article: FIDE Grand Prix 2012–2013 (2) http://dod.ru/chess/game/Crest/Smal...; (3) Further details are at this post: Hikaru Nakamura; (4) https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast... (podcast interview by Ben Johnson through iTunes); Live rating list: http://www.2700chess.com/; Wikipedia article: Hikaru Nakamura

Last updated: 2024-04-14 20:46:42

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 157; games 1-25 of 3,915  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. S Predescu vs Nakamura 1-0641995U.S. National Scholastic Grade 2 ChampionshipB08 Pirc, Classical
2. L Au vs Nakamura 1-0431997Hawaii opB83 Sicilian
3. Nakamura vs J Bonin 1-0361997Marshall Chess ClubC02 French, Advance
4. J Kleinman vs Nakamura  ½-½411997January CongressA49 King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4
5. Nakamura vs B Karen 0-1521997Nassau FuturityB06 Robatsch
6. A Bisguier vs Nakamura 0-1211998Somerset ACN Action SwissE70 King's Indian
7. B Karen vs Nakamura  0-1261998Nassau g/30B23 Sicilian, Closed
8. A Stripunsky vs Nakamura 0-1431998Marshall Chess ClubB40 Sicilian
9. P MacIntyre vs Nakamura  1-0541998US Amateur Team EastA07 King's Indian Attack
10. J Thinnsen vs Nakamura 1-035199899th US OpenA45 Queen's Pawn Game
11. Nakamura vs I Krush 1-062199899th US OpenB67 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...a6 Defense, 8...Bd7
12. S Kriventsov vs Nakamura  1-0241999Rated TournamentB80 Sicilian, Scheveningen
13. Nakamura vs J Fang 0-12119998th Eastern Class ChampionshipsB73 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
14. A David vs Nakamura  1-025199927th World OpenB92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
15. Nakamura vs W Paschall  ½-½251999North Bay OpenB65 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...Be7 Defense, 9...Nxd4
16. J Hebert vs Nakamura  1-0601999North Bay OpenE97 King's Indian
17. Nakamura vs V Rajlich  1-0521999North Bay OpenB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
18. G Taylor vs Nakamura  1-0311999North Bay OpenE75 King's Indian, Averbakh, Main line
19. Nakamura vs F Baragar  0-1451999North Bay OpenC17 French, Winawer, Advance
20. M Stroud vs Nakamura  0-1371999North Bay OpenE92 King's Indian
21. S Glinert vs Nakamura  ½-½381999North Bay OpenA07 King's Indian Attack
22. D Moody vs Nakamura 0-1201999100th US OpenB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
23. Nakamura vs A Aleksandrov ½-½601999100th US OpenC45 Scotch Game
24. A Wojtkiewicz vs Nakamura 1-0421999100th US OpenE62 King's Indian, Fianchetto
25. Nakamura vs G Gaiffe 1-0541999100th US OpenB23 Sicilian, Closed
 page 1 of 157; games 1-25 of 3,915  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Nakamura wins | Nakamura loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 395 OF 858 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-01-10  timhortons: <and the bigger the sample, the more confidence we can have in the message of the stats.>

the spin that say , nakas win over magnus in oslo is not really a good indicator that naka is better than magnus in blitz.

how many games again they need to play and how many times naka will win so that you agree that naka is better than magnus in blitz.

YAWN.

SCIENCE IS EXCITING!

Feb-01-10  timhortons: <Is it official that Naka has cancelled Aeroflot>

Naka confirmed that yesterday at icc<no aeroflot>.

lets wait for his blog update. the only sched posted so far is US championship.

Our GM needs to enjoy life,maybe a date with a GF and hanging out with friends, i know for one naka is a good fan of hockey game.

Feb-01-10  BTO7: What i like is Naka is blazing his own trail. He does things his way. They say blitz will ruin your game ...hes proving it may just be the opposite. They say you should have a really strong second and he uses a master. They say you shouldn't play with the go for broke attitude because it wont work against the elite ...again hes showing other wise. One must study a million hours a day again ...Naka gets out and plays some hockey and gets to things when he feels like it all at the same time giving MUCH back to his fans logging on to ICC. What this proves to me is ...he gets away with this because of his "natural talent" that really cant be taught to a player. If he was only trying to shore up his stats against 2700 players i think he could have easily done that...the game against Sergey was a clear example and several other games. Naka is a breath of fresh air in chess going against the grain of all that is supposedly wrong and blazing his own trail ..that if he should one day become champion will crack all traditional thinking about chess. He will make his mark i believe much more pronounce then say magnus who has Garrys help and others that have gone the traditional route. Naka makes it very clear ...hes his own man and does things his own way ...just as he does on the board and this to me is very respectable and refreshing to see. The only argument as of today anyone can still make is there is only 15 guys left standing between him and magnus now even in standard time controls and of course we know hes already the king of blitz and ICC as it stands now. The excuses and the stats are quickly running out a mere 2 points more and there would only be 12 guys between him and the best standard rating as of today....quite remarkable if you ask me :)
Feb-01-10  veigaman: I have the feeling that nakamura played the best chess in corus in general terms which it is remarkable for him
Feb-01-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: TPSTAR & FRIENDS

Greetings chess fans, and welcome to the program! As always, our goals are to defend the criminal element on this site, perpetuate vicious rumors and untruthful claims, and generally make complete fools out of ourselves! But of course, we would never launch any smear campaigns against other posters. We do have our standards.

Let's start the show with a rundown of Nakamura's thrilling performance at Corus 2010. Expectations were mixed after an American chess site announced "Group A includes Nakamura" on their home page, which was hastily amended with "and others" (although it remained unclear who those "others" were) but here goes:

1) J Smeets vs Nakamura, 2010 A fine fighting Sicilian, well played by both sides to split the point.

2) Nakamura vs Van Wely, 2010 Grr, voff, voff, he he. King Loek gets upended by 15. Nd5!? & 22. Rxe5! and Prince Naka is +1.

3) Short vs Nakamura, 2010 Short fights the Boleslavsky with b3/Bb2 yet Nakamura wins the tactical battle with precise power play.

4) Nakamura vs Carlsen, 2010 These days Carlsen and Kasparov are so intertwined that Gazza played out this endgame OTB but nobody noticed. Naturally chessbase gave Carlsparov an exclamation point every time they mentioned his name.

5) Anand vs Nakamura, 2010 Anand goes Dutch into an safe draw.

6) Ivanchuk vs Nakamura, 2010 Nakamura only spends 16 moves on Planet Ivanchuk.

7) Nakamura vs Shirov, 2010 A sharp Sicilian Sveshnikov against the tournament leader where Nakamura missed the decisive 35. c5! but won anyway to reach +3!

8) Kramnik vs Nakamura, 2010 A double whammy for Nakamura this round, with insult added to injury after being thoroughly outplayed by Kramnik and then getting outarroganted afterward.

9) Nakamura vs Karjakin, 2010 Unbalanced NID game where White spurned an early repetition but Black found the neat winning moves 37 ... Rc2! & 38 ... Be2! for 0-1.

10) L Dominguez vs Nakamura, 2010 Accelerated Dragon against LDP where Nakamura saved a bad endgame for a draw.

11) Nakamura vs Leko, 2010 The gods have frowned upon Leko ever since those two short draws as White in Brissago 2004.

12) F Caruana vs Nakamura, 2010 Sicilian Accelerated Dragon into Maroczy Bind, fairly even until Black missed 37 ... Kd7! with zugzwang and they drew.

13) Nakamura vs Tiviakov, 2010 While Carlsen went through the motions with a 56 move draw which was probably all home prep, Nakamura turned a tame Scandinavian line into a masterful minor piece endgame to end at +2.

So Nakamura finishes Corus A tied 4-5 with Anand, fully raising his faint hopes that he might be invited to Corus C next year or else next decade.

Feb-01-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: In other news, organizers are already planning the Anish Giri Memorial Tournament after he made the fatal mistake of defeating Wesley So, thus Giri could be rubbed out by a Wesley So fan any time now, especially after this anonymous threat: "Enjoy your day since it maybe your last. At least I have more days to look forward to. Come back from the grave tommorrow and we shall see." A cult classic. Some RP sources say So was the best player in Corus B even though he finished 4th, similar to Norwegian outlets claiming Carlsen beat Nakamura 3-0 in Oslo 2009 when actually Nakamura won 3-1.

Next up for Naka's kookiest fans, we'll examine the rampant anti-American rage on this site and on this page. It must have been indescribably disheartening for poor, gentle, reserved Hikaru to visit his page during Corus only to find such rabid anti-American sentiments as "Nakamura played a great game today!" and "Good luck Nakamura" and worse. Obviously, if you aren't a devoted fan of a US player, you must be anti-American, or so I read. See if you know who made which quote:

1) "Denying that smoking causes ill health is typical for US citizens. They also still discuss the death penalty as if there could ever be a valid reason for it, just because the gov approves of it."

2) "[President Obama is] turning out to be as much of a murderous bastard as Bush, only a lot more articulate and charming."

3) "I don't see how the Holocaust is any worse than what the US or Western Europe has done. In fact, there could be a valid argument the US has traditionally been more racist than Nazi Germany ever has."

4) "Fans sulking that Nakamura is being unfairly treated only increases my prejudice about (too many) Americans as being unable to have an enlightened and neutral view on matters of a 'global character' - the viewpoint is hopelessly anchored in local/regional values and ways of considering things, and (too) little effort is made at getting the complete, big picture."

5) "I think that when all is said and done, Nakamura will be nothing more than a skid mark on the underpants of chess history."

How many did ya get?!

Well kids, that's all for now. Until Godzilla strikes fear into the chess world again, this is <tpstar> signing off from the land of the free and the home of the brave! Go Nakamura! ;>D

Feb-02-10  Atking: <No, I didn't intend to provoke someone. I just like competition (that's why I like debates and chess). Once again I'm misunderstood.> Ok <AlexMagnus> I'm not the kind of man who pushed over and over on one mistake. Nobody (And I'm in the number) is perfect. But as noted BOT7 your bet could be more positive for Nakamura. And no bet will be even better.

<frogbert> as I said, statistics are only indicators. Indeed you seem agree with that. An analysis of the game will give a better indication of the battle. 1/2 could be a result with the upper hand on White side or Black side or to be completely equal. Your statisitic will not show that especially in such short range. Corus was a great test for Nakamura and he passed it. Sure he was lucky vs Dominguez (This is the only game I have in doubt) but all players in the top got some points here and there - lost to draw or draw to win - more than one time. Maybe Carlsen, Kramnik were helped by their reputation and, for the first part Shirov by his momentum (Anand's result looks to me more consistent) they already got what Nakamura still not have. A reputation at the top. That's a normal retribution of a long effort. But that will not appear in your statistics especially in such short range. Except Tiviakov who seemed to protect (statistically :() his rating, Van Wely who was in crazy mood the others "lowers" players like Caruana, Smeets and Short proved to be dangerous even for a near 2800 Elo.

In this site there are very objectif analysis. <Eyal> and some other posters give us very good indication and what was going on. Of course that's not perfect and one purpose of this site is to perfect this analysis. They didn't try to prove something out the game is saying itself. That way looks better to me. But, that's right you need more time to do it properly.

Feb-02-10  frogbert: tpstar, i think you must have missed a class or two regarding constructive and effective communication.

i again invite you to get down from your pedestal and engage in a conversation, instead of writing satirical newspaper columns in typical one-way communication mode.

you're welcome to post something in my player page, as a start. we might discuss "smear campaigns", for instance. and concepts like "action" and "reaction" and their relationship.

also, i'd like to ask you about your repeated advice to others to <move on> - and how this matches your own habit of digging a couple of years back to take fragments out of context to "prove" how someone "really is", with no interest or intention of opening any discussion around your accusations.

you report a crime, you catch the criminal and then you pose as judge and jury and pass the sentence.

again, i'm stupid enough to be willing to respond to your accusations <if> you would sit down and talk without requiring me to plead guilty on all accounts <before> you're willing to even look at the person in front of you. and there's something related to the concept of "smear campaign" that it's really urgent that we discuss.

remember, you don't want anyone to apply your own techniques on yourself, so why don't we simply scrap this dysfunctional "dialogue" and talk in a constructive, open-minded way over at my player page? can you do that?

Feb-02-10  frogbert: <In this site there are very objectif analysis. <Eyal> and some other posters give us very good indication and what was going on.>

single games, no matter how thoroughly and "objectively" analysed, are not very well suited to convey information about "the big picture" and/or someone's development as a chess player. and at the end of the day, the goal of a game of chess is to win it. chance evens out in the long run - hence, you don't really need more than someone's results as long as the sample set is sufficiently big.

focusing too narrowly might lead to a situation where you can't see the forest for the trees. in the end it comes down to what you want to know or say something about.

Feb-02-10  Atking: Focusing. That is. And not an easy matter. That's the reason you can't say too much with only one method. Did you suspect that Nakamura will shared 4 with Anand in Corus? Not easy to know where begin the forest and which trees to count. Each approach should have some modesty in their application and that will be better.
Feb-02-10  BTO7: tpstar strikes a nerve with <frogbert> ...over the following statement <4) Nakamura vs Carlsen, 2010 These days Carlsen and Kasparov are so intertwined that Gazza played out this endgame OTB but nobody noticed. Naturally chessbase gave Carlsparov an exclamation point every time they mentioned his name.> Frog cleverly disguises his displeasure with a invite <so why don't we simply scrap this dysfunctional "dialogue" and talk in a constructive, open-minded way over at my player page? can you do that?> to fight it out in private (plugging his own page) so tp can get his <"the big picture" >. I declare its done at neutral page so we can sell ring side seats...advantage tp for bringing out the BULL in the frog ;)
Feb-02-10  SugarDom: What a classic by Tippy. What would we do if Tippy leaves chessgames.com?

I'm sure gonna miss him, he makes kibitzing in CG a thrill.

I heard he's moving to Norway now to join Magnus and Kaspy...

I think i'm gonna sing him a song. He's my brother and he's Older than me...

User: tpstar

Feb-02-10  Appaz: There was a time found it more irritating beeing accused of caring about accusations than the accusations themself.

Today I know this is just a way for some people to make themself feel important and that they are noticed.

Feb-02-10  rogge: <How many did ya get?!> 5/5

1) twinlark
2) octavia
3) jointhearmy (American)
4) frogbert
5) wolfmaster

Feb-02-10  gus inn: <rogge> ROFL ! You are too funny.
Feb-02-10  BTO7: Of the 5 given ...looks the frog got stuff with the most words said ...lol imagine that ...keeps this up he will be ready for the thanksgiving table.
Feb-02-10  Rolfo: Last night I piced up an not so old edition of NIC (News in Chess) and read a 6 page interview that Naka gave to the editor (after San Sebastian). Important things he said (all from memory):

1) Since three months he laid some hearthbreak things with a girl behind. He had gotten more order of his life

2) He worked more structured and maturedly with openings and preparations to each game thanks to friend and trainer Kris Littlejohn who he praised highly

3) He preferred going more often to Europe to play more strong GM's

4) He considered Magnus and Aronian to be future contestors to him on his way to fight for W Champ throne (after Anand/Topalov/Kramnik era).

After all, he left me with a good impression of himself..

Feb-02-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <A double whammy for Nakamura this round, with insult added to injury after being thoroughly outplayed by Kramnik and then getting outarroganted afterward.>

LOL!

Feb-02-10  timhortons: waiting...waiting...waiting for the blog update of our chess champion hikaru nakamura...

frog by the way, how did you arrive at the conclusion that people are conspiring against you? through statistical data?

Feb-02-10  timhortons: <then getting outarroganted afterward> <tpstar>

when did nakamura become arrogant with you, im just asking.

Feb-02-10  timhortons: http://www.cs.utu.fi/~juhkivij/ches...

nak on top of the chart at icc!

i just hope he would once again claim this year US crown, once again be the chess 960 king.

as he said last year there will be no japanese leaugue for the moment as he will focus on more stronger tournament.

one more! hoping for a stronger tourneo international de montreal, as canadas economy go stable i hope the quebec chess federations sponsors can afford to sponsor a category 18 tournament, last year where naiditsch become a champion, it was onlt category 15.

i hope GM nakamura will be invited once again in Quebec! lol our page picture here need an update.

Feb-02-10  frogbert: < Did you suspect that Nakamura will shared 4 with Anand in Corus?>

atking, in which way is that relevant? i certainly did not consider that outcome impossible or anything.

prior to the event i said that based on how nakamura did in his first cat. 18 event, i thought it likely that it wouldn't take too long before he would win a cat. 19 event too. corus was a cat. 19 event.

one nakamura fan wrote on these pages that he thought nakamura would win corus 2010. another said he wouldn't be at all surprised if that happened.

do you think there was some "method" based on studying nakamura's individual games prior to corus 2010 that could lead to the prediction that "i think naka will finish shared 4th at +2"?

even after nakamura's great start and 2850+ tpr so far, i said i would be surprised if he finished top 3. at that time, several nakamura fans were behaving and speaking as if nakamura already was at the level of carlsen and kramnik.

you know i enjoy analysing chess games. i also think it's a good way to identify strengths and weaknesses of some person's play. but as a method of comparing a player to <other players>, it falls short to an approach based on considering (exclusively) results. that's my strong belief, anyway.

Feb-02-10  SetNoEscapeOn: <frogbert: <Not good to use it as an absolute argument.> atking, what does "an absolute argument" mean?

statistics are statistics. rating performances are way more objective than any considerations about "quality of games" or such, made by more or less biased people.>

All right, but what about Kramnik and Carlsen? If I trust statistical analysis more than the average opinion on this site, I trust their opinions when it comes to chess players more than any amount of statistical analysis. After all, he just finished +2 in his first Corus tournament, ahead of people like Ivanchuk and Karjakin, with a 2774 performance rating, so I don't see anything to contradict what they said.

Feb-02-10  black.pr0jekt: <appaz> you are not hikaru nakumura
Feb-02-10  frogbert: <so I don't see anything to contradict what they said.>

did i contradict anything kramnik and carlsen said? i certainly don't think so. but i'm addressing issues they don't even touch.

note that i almost exclusively speak about <the past> and very seldom try to extrapolate trends into the future. i do however comment on trends of the recent past, and regarding nakamura i've said:

1) he's improving (notably) against the 2700+ players

2) i expect this improvement to continue with more exposure to strong opponents

3) his corus 2010 event still had the same pattern as before, with naka doing clearly better against the sub-2700 than against the 2700+ players.

4) over-all there is evidence of a generally higher level in his play.

it must be possible to hold more than one thought in one's head at the time. pointing out 3, which is an important, statistical fact, doesn't exclude the ability to recognize 1) and 2).

while kramnik was asked about and talked about nakamura <now> with mainly a future perspective, my analysis are based on statitics - hence, the past - and a comparison of past performances with the most recent ones, to describe trends. like boz pointed out: i'm not an oracle or a gambler - i mainly describe what's already there.

hence, the overlap between what kramnik/carlsen commented on and what i typically comment on, isn't that big. and again: i don't see much of a contradiction, either - but i've made comments on a lot of things they obviously didn't address and probably didn't have much knowledge of, either. do you think kramnik is concerned with nakamura's rating performances against various kinds of opponents? ;o)

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 858)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 395 OF 858 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC