chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Hikaru Nakamura
Nakamura 
 

Number of games in database: 4,749
Years covered: 1995 to 2025
Last FIDE rating: 2807 (2737 rapid, 2838 blitz)
Highest rating achieved in database: 2816
Overall record: +1129 -451 =736 (64.6%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 2433 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (371) 
    B23 B30 B90 B51 B50
 Reti System (236) 
    A04 A06 A05
 Ruy Lopez (187) 
    C65 C67 C77 C78 C84
 Queen's Pawn Game (134) 
    A45 D00 D02 E10 D05
 Queen's Gambit Declined (128) 
    D37 D31 D38 D30 D35
 Nimzo-Larsen Attack (89) 
    A01
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (302) 
    B90 B30 B22 B92 B80
 Ruy Lopez (287) 
    C67 C65 C70 C72 C78
 Queen's Gambit Declined (170) 
    D37 D31 D30 D39 D06
 Queen's Pawn Game (169) 
    D02 A40 A45 A41 A46
 Giuoco Piano (148) 
    C53 C50 C54
 King's Indian (142) 
    E97 E92 E63 E94 E90
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Krasenkow vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Gelfand vs Nakamura, 2010 0-1
   Rybka vs Nakamura, 2008 0-1
   So vs Nakamura, 2015 0-1
   G Sagalchik vs Nakamura, 2003 0-1
   Crafty vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Nakamura vs Karjakin, 2004 1-0
   A Beliavsky vs Nakamura, 2009 0-1
   Nakamura vs Kramnik, 2012 1-0
   Nakamura vs J W Loyte, 2001 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Corsica Masters (2007)
   Trophee CCAS (2008)
   Magnus Carlsen Invitational (2020)
   Meltwater Tour Final (2021)
   Bullet Chess Championship (2023)
   Ordix Open (2009)
   New In Chess Classic (2021)
   Chess.com Speed Chess Championship 2017/18 (2017)
   Tata Steel India (2022)
   Magnus Carlsen Chess Tour Finals (2020)
   chess.com Speed Chess (2020)
   Chess.com SpeedChess Finals (2024)
   Champions Showdown (2019)
   Pro Chess League (2018)
   PRO League Group Stage (2019)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Naka's Nook Mistook Fredthebear stan theo by fredthebear
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 212 by 0ZeR0
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 243 by 0ZeR0
   Notable Nakamura Games by caracas1970
   book: Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by Baby Hawk
   Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by kenilworthian
   Vid e o put Fredthebear in th is cent ury by fredthebear
   Notable Nakamura Games by iron maiden
   2020 The Corona Beer & Black Bears Matter Mo Ode by fredthebear
   Hikaru! by larrewl
   Match Nakamura! by docjan
   Match Nakamura! by amadeus

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 Iowa Open Championship
   Nakamura vs A Khanbutaev (Sep-07-25) 1-0
   A S Rao vs Nakamura (Sep-07-25) 0-1
   M Pikus vs Nakamura (Sep-06-25) 0-1
   Nakamura vs B Darr (Sep-06-25) 1-0
   Nakamura vs D Zagar (Sep-06-25) 1-0

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Hikaru Nakamura
Search Google for Hikaru Nakamura
FIDE player card for Hikaru Nakamura

HIKARU NAKAMURA
(born Dec-09-1987, 37 years old) Japan (federation/nationality United States of America)

[what is this?]

IM (2001); GM (2003). Hikaru Nakamura won the US Championship in 2004, 2009, 2012, 2015 and 2019. He was the world's second-ranked player as of October 2015. In July 2023, he married WGM Atousa Pourkashiyan.

Prodigy

Christopher Hikaru Nakamura was born December 9, 1987 in Hirakata in Osaka, Japan, to a Japanese father and an American mother. He is the younger brother of Asuka Nakamura. When he was two years old, he and his mother and brother moved to the United States. He started playing chess when he was seven, coached by his stepfather, Sunil Weeramantry. He was the youngest player in US history to defeat an International Master (Jay Bonin) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 0 months), to become a National Master (USCF) (10 years, 79 days), to defeat a Grandmaster (Arthur Bisguier) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 117 days), and to become an IM (13 years, 2 months), although most of these records have subsequently been surpassed. In 2003 he became the USA's youngest-ever grandmaster (15 years, 2 months and 19 days), a record later broken by Fabiano Caruana and Ray Robson.

Championships

<Youth> In 2001 he won the World U14 championship.

<National> When he won the Chessmaster US Championship 2005 (2004) (on tiebreak from Alexander Stripunsky), he was the youngest player to win the US championship since Robert James Fischer. He also won the US Championship (2009) outright by half a point ahead of the joint runners-up Robert Hess and Alexander Onischuk, and the United States Championship (2012) outright by a full point ahead of the winner of the 2010 and 2011 events, Gata Kamsky. He won the national title for a fourth time when he took out the US Championship (2015) with 8/11, half a point ahead of the outright runner up Ray Robson.

<World championship cycle> Seeded number 87 and aged 16, Nakamura reached the final 16 in the FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004), defeating 46th seed Sergey Volkov, 19th seeded Aleksej Aleksandrov, and 51st seed Alexander Lastin in the preliminary rounds before bowing out to number 3 seed and finalist Michael Adams in the round of 16. He qualified to play in the World Cup (2013) through his rating, and defeated Peruvian WGM Deysi Estela Cori Tello in the first round, Azeri GM Eltaj Safarli in the second round and Indian GM Baskaran Adhiban in the third round, but was eliminated in the Round of 16 (fourth round) by Ukrainian GM Anton Korobov. He qualified by rating to participate in the World Cup (2015), and is doing so although he has already qualified for the Candidates Tournament of 2016 via the Grand Prix series of 2014-15. He defeated Richmond Phiri, Sam Shankland in the first two rounds, as well as Ian Nepomniachtchi in a third round thriller that Nakamura won in the deciding Armageddon blitz tiebreaker game after the three previous sets of rapid and blitz tiebreakers had been drawn. In the Round of 16 (the fourth round) he won against Michael Adams by 1.5-0.5 but lost to Pavel Eljanov in the quarter final, bowing out of the event.

<Grand Prix Series 2012-2013> He started the Grand Prix series with last at the FIDE Grand Prix London (2012). After bouncing back into contention with outright second in the FIDE Grand Prix Zug (2013), a poor showing at the FIDE Grand Prix Thessaloniki (2013) eliminated him from contention for the top 2 spots that would have qualified him for the 2014 Candidates Tournament. (1) He did however place 3rd behind Fabiano Caruana and Boris Gelfand in the FIDE Grand Prix Paris (2013) to accumulate 300 GP points and place 6th in the 2012-13 Grand Prix series. Subsequently, his only chance to play in the 2014 Candidates Tournament was to be nominated as the Organizer's wild card once the venue was settled, however this did not eventuate.

<Grand Prix Series 2014-2015> Nakamura competed in the first leg of the series at the FIDE Grand Prix Baku (2014), where he scored 6/11 to place 3rd-7th, half a point behind the joint leaders Caruana and Gelfand. He therefore kicked off with a GP tally of 82 points, representing the even distribution of points applicable to each place from 3rd to 7th. In the second leg of the series, namely the FIDE Grand Prix Tashkent (2014), he placed =2nd and stood in 2nd place overall, excellently situated to take advantage of the opportunity to qualify for the Candidates tournament in 2016. He took full advantage of this in FIDE Grand Prix Khanty-Mansiysk (2015), when he came =1st to qualify for the Candidates Tournament of 2016.

Standard tournaments

In 2005, he won the 7th Foxwoods Open (2005).

In 2007, he won both the National Open (2007) that was held in Las Vegas and the Casino de Barcelona (2007).

The following year, he beat Xiangzhi Bu in the play-off to win the Gibraltar Masters (2008) Masters Open with 8.0/10.

Nakamura tied for first with Evgeny Najer at the 37th World Open (2009) after taking two last-day byes, each worth half a point and won the Donostia Chess Festival (2009) in tiebreak over Ruslan Ponomariov.

In 2010, he came =4th at Corus Group A (2010), and was equal top scorer in the victorious Rising Stars team in the Rising Stars - Experience (2010) tournament. He scored 5/9 (+1 -0 =8) at the Tal Memorial (2010), placing =4th, and finished the year with =4th place in the London Chess Classic (2010).

Nakamura began 2011 by taking clear first place at the A-Group of the prestigious category 20 Tata Steel Group A (2011) (formerly Corus) with a 9/13 score (+6 -1 =6) and a 2880 performance rating, ahead of a powerful field including the world's top four players: World Champion Viswanathan Anand, Magnus Carlsen, Levon Aronian and former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik. In June 2011, Nakamura placed =3rd in the Bazna King's Tournament (2011), in July he scored 4.5/10 at Dortmund Sparkassen (2011), in August he came =1st in the 2011 US Open Championship with 7.5/9 and in October he came =3rd in the Grand Slam Chess Final (2011) with 5/10. The following month, he suffered a lapse in form at the category 22 Tal Memorial (2011), scoring 3/9 and coming last but recovered to finish 2011 with second place behind Kramnik at the category 20 London Chess Classic (2011), scoring +4 -1 =3 (TPR of 2887).

He started 2012 by coming =2nd (4th on count back) at the Reggio Emilia (2011), half a point behind Anish Giri, and then came =5th at Tata Steel Group A (2012), scoring 7.5/13 (+3 -1 =9). He followed up in April 2012 with 1st at the 6th Annual Grand Pacific Open held in British Columbia. He competed in the Tal Memorial (2012) held in June, scoring 4/9. In July/August 2012, Nakamura placed a solid =3rd at the Biel Chess Festival (2012), but underperformed at the European Club Cup (2012), although in October 2012, he recovered to some extent by winning the 4 player double round robin 16th Unive Tournament (2012) (crown group) with 4.5/6 (+3 -0 =3). Nakamura finished 2012 with a strong 3rd placement in the London Chess Classic (2012) behind Carlsen and Kramnik, adding enough rating points to restore him to the top 10.

2013 started with a modest 7/13 result for outright 6th at the Tata Steel Group A (2013) event. He then followed up in May 2013 with equal 2nd at the Norway Chess (2013) with 5.5/9, half a point behind Sergey Karjakin and 3rd on tiebreak behind Carlsen; he also placed =2nd with 6/9 at the preliminary Norway Chess (Blitz) (2013) held to determine the draw for the main tournament, and earned the right to play with the White pieces in 5 games out of 9. In June 2013, he contested the category 22 Tal Memorial (2013), and was outright leader after 6 rounds. However, he lost the last 3 game to place 6th with 4.5/9, winning more games (4) and losing more games (4) than any other player in the tournament. Soon after, he came =3rd in the Houston Open in July 2013. In September he played in the quadrangular double round robin category 22 Sinquefield Cup (2013), and was in contention for first place until the last round, when he drew against Gata Kamsky finishing second with 3.5/6 (+2 -1 =3; TPR 2863) behind Magnus Carlsen.

Nakamura's first event in 2014 was the category 20 Tata Steel Masters (2014) where he scored 5/11 (+2 -3 =6) to shed a few rating points for FIDE's February rating list. He next competed in the category 23 Zurich Chess Challenge (2014) in which he placed 4th with 2/5 after coming agonisingly close to defeating World Champion Magnus Carlsen. He came 2nd with 3.5/5 in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2014) which followed the standard time event, to remain in 4th in the overall event with the results of the standard and rapid events combined. In April, he participated in the inaugural Gashimov Memorial (2014), a category XXII 6-player DRR event inaugurated in honor of the late Azeri grandmaster, scoring 5/10 and placing =3rd behind Carlsen and Caruana. At the London Chess Classic (2014), he scored 2.5/5 to place 4th.

Nakamura's start to 2015 was to win the powerful Gibraltar Masters (2015) with 8.5/10 (+7 =3), and return a PB on his live rating and his new FIDE rating due in March. Despite cracking the 2800 barrier in the live ratings during the RR category 22 Zurich Chess Challenge (2015) held in February, he placed outright 2nd in the standard portion of the event behind Anand, ahead of Kramnik, Karjakin, Aronian and Caruana respectively. His second place in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2015) with 3/5 made him =1st with Anand in the overall event, but he won an Armageddon tiebreaker with the former World Champion to win first prize. His good form continued at the category 22 Norway Chess (2015) event, where he was undefeated to place =2nd (3rd on a narrow SB tiebreak), behind Topalov and alongside Anand with 6/9 and a TPR of 2900. In September he competed in the second leg of the inaugural Grand Chess Tour at Sinquefield Cup (2015), and finished equal second with 5/9 behind Aronian in what amounted to a par for rating performance. October saw Nakamura compete in the lucrative Millionaire Chess (2015) tournament, which he won after battling through a complicated tiebreak system that involved a playoff to decide a playoff for fourth, and then winning a knockout rapid game semi-final that was called after round 7 of 9 of the main standard time event. He finished the year with a poor performance at the London Chess Classic (2015) where he came in toward the bottom of the field after scoring 4/9.

He started 2016 with an upbeat result at the Gibraltar Masters (2016), winning first prize after a rapid and blitz game tiebreak that ended in an Armageddon victory against runner-up Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. He finished clear second at the
FIDE Grand Swiss (2023), scoring 8/11 (+5 =6 -0) and qualifying for the 2024 Candidates tournament.

Team Events

<Olympiads> Nakamura has represented the U.S. in the Olympiads of 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2014, helping his country to the bronze medal in 2006 and 2008. He scored 6/10 during the Khanty-Mansiysk Olympiad (2010) on top board for the USA and a performance rating of 2741 and 6/9 in the Istanbul Olympiad (2012), coming in fourth on top board. His overall score in Olympiads is 31 points accumulated in 49 games played.

<World Team Championship> Nakamura played board 1 for the USA at the World Team Championship (2010), scoring individual gold and team silver. He also played top board at the World Team Championship (2013), winning individual silver and helping his team to 4th place in the event.

<European Club Cup> He played top board for the SK Husek Vienna in the European Club Cup (2009) and top board for the Italian club Obiettivo Risarcimento Padova in 2012 and 2013, second board for the Italian club in 2014 and board 3 for the same club in 2015. He scored individual bronze in 2013 and 2014.

Rapids

Nakamura is one of the world's best rapid and blitz players, and the world's best bullet (one-minute) player. He regularly plays on the internet, usually at the ICC where he is the highest rated player (userid <Smallville>), and at Playchess, where he is known as <Star Wars>. He has set many rating records under different categories. In 2008, he challenged and broke blitz king Alexander Grischuk 's record at ICC of 3737, reaching 3750. Grischuk subsequently challenged Nakamura to a 20 game 3 minutes blitz match, which Nakamura took out convincingly by 14.5-5.5. (2) He also won the first ICC Open in 2011 ahead of over 2000 other contestants. (3)

In 2007, he won the annual Corsica Masters (2007), defeating Rustam Kasimdzhanov in the final. One of the most convincing demonstrations of Nakamura's ability as a rapid player was when he won the Trophee CCAS (2008), defeating Xiangzhi Bu, Anatoly Karpov and Vasyl Ivanchuk in the playoff matches to take first prize in a field that included Carlsen. Nakamura also defeated Carlsen to take out the BNbank Blitz (2009). He was runner-up to Ivanchuk at the Cap d'Agde (2010) in the playoff. He also defeated Rising Stars team mate Anish Giri for the right to play at Amber 2011.

In 2012, Nakamura won the trifecta of silver medals at the SportAccord World Mind Games (Men's Rapid) (2012), the World Mind Games (Men's Blitz) and the World Mind Games (Men's Blindfold) events. He closed out 2013 by winning the London Chess Classic (Knockout) (2013), defeating Gelfand in the final by 1.5-0.5, after qualifying for the final by winning the preliminary London Chess Classic (Group C) (2013).

In June 2014, he competed in both the World Rapid Championship (2014) and the World Blitz Championship (2014) that were held in Dubai. In the former, he scored a relatively meager 8.5/15, losing 40 rapid rating points, while he was much more successful in the latter, scoring 16/21, being the runner up by a point behind the winner Magnus Carlsen. His blitz rating skyrocketed to over 2900. Subsequently he competed in the Super Rapidplay Open that was a companion event to the 2014 London Classic (see above), winning the event with an almost perfect score of 9.5/10. He also competed in the London Elite Player Blitz that was the other companion event, and placed =1st with 6/10.

The 2016 edition of the Zurich Chess Challenge was a two-part event, which kicked off with a preliminary Zurich Chess Challenge (Opening Blitz) (2016) to determine who had three whites in the five rounds of the Zurich Chess Challenge (2016) (rapid). Nakamura placed first in the Opening Blitz earning the use of the white pieces in three of the five rounds of the first section of the actual tournament, the round robin rapid event where he placed equal first alongside Anand. Nakamura playing the black pieces three times in the second section of the event, the Zurich Chess Challenge (Blitz) (2016), again placed equal first with Anand to tie the overall score, but won on tiebreak to take first prize.

He has authored the book Bullet Chess: One Minute to Mate.

Matches

In December 2004, Nakamura played the best-of-six game Karjakin - Nakamura Match (2004) in the "Duelo de los Jovenes Prodigios" (Duel of the Wonder Boys) in Cuernavaca, Estado de Morelos, Mexico, winning 4.5-1.5 (+4 -1 =1). In May 2011 at the St Louis chess club, he won the Nakamura - Ponomariov Match (2011) by 3.5-2.5 (+2 =3 -1). In June 2014, he played for the Cez Trophy Navara - Nakamura Match (2014) in Praha, Czechia, which involved a 4-game standard time match against David Navara. He won the match by 3.5-0.5.

960 Chess

In August 2009, Nakamura defeated Aronian in Mainz, Germany to become the 960 world champion and remained unchallenged as such until Carlsen defeated him in a match in February 2018 by a margin of 14-10.

Ratings and rankings

Nakamura's highest ranking as a Junior (U20) was #3 in April 2004 and 2005. He first broke into the world's top 100 in October 2004 when he was still 16 years old, and has remained in the top 100 continuously since that time. He reached the world's top 10 in January 2011, and has remained in that elite group continuously since January 2013. In September 2015 his rating reached 2814 despite which he was still ranked world #4 behind Carlsen, Anand and Topalov respectively. However in October 2016, his ranking reached its highest point so far, 2816, when his ranking was world #2, his highest ranking so far.

Sources and references

(1) Wikipedia article: FIDE Grand Prix 2012–2013 (2) http://dod.ru/chess/game/Crest/Smal...; (3) Further details are at this post: Hikaru Nakamura; (4) https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast... (podcast interview by Ben Johnson through iTunes); Live rating list: http://www.2700chess.com/; Wikipedia article: Hikaru Nakamura

Last updated: 2024-04-14 20:46:42

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 190; games 1-25 of 4,749  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. S Predescu vs Nakamura 1-0641995U.S. National Scholastic Grade 2 ChampionshipB08 Pirc, Classical
2. Nakamura vs J Bonin 1-0361997Marshall Chess ClubC02 French, Advance
3. A Iljin vs Nakamura  1-0471997Wch U10E62 King's Indian, Fianchetto
4. A Bellaiche vs Nakamura  1-0601997Wch U10E97 King's Indian
5. B Amin vs Nakamura  1-0681997Wch U10A07 King's Indian Attack
6. Nakamura vs D Baramidze  0-1411997Wch U10B23 Sicilian, Closed
7. J Kleinman vs Nakamura  ½-½411997January CongressA49 King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4
8. L Au vs Nakamura 1-0431997Hawaii OpenB83 Sicilian
9. Nakamura vs B Karen 0-1521997Nassau FuturityB06 Robatsch
10. Nakamura vs V Eryomenko  1-0371997Wch U10B01 Scandinavian
11. M Lepan vs Nakamura  0-1351997Wch U10E61 King's Indian
12. Nakamura vs S Djukic  1-0281997Wch U10B23 Sicilian, Closed
13. B Karen vs Nakamura  0-1261998Nassau g/30B23 Sicilian, Closed
14. A Bisguier vs Nakamura 0-1211998Somerset ACN Action SwissE70 King's Indian
15. A Stripunsky vs Nakamura 0-1431998Marshall Chess ClubB40 Sicilian
16. Nakamura vs L Chipkin  1-0361998Nassau CC-chC13 French
17. Nakamura vs R Guevara  1-0351998Nassau CC-chC11 French
18. Nakamura vs R Panken  1-0441998Nassau CC-chB23 Sicilian, Closed
19. Nakamura vs L W Zemanian  1-0411998New York State-ch 120thC45 Scotch Game
20. J J Felber vs Nakamura  0-1431998New York State-ch 120thB33 Sicilian
21. S Goregliad vs Nakamura  1-0401998Nassau CC-chE62 King's Indian, Fianchetto
22. Silvio Niculescu vs Nakamura  1-0641998Nassau CC-chA04 Reti Opening
23. D Shapiro vs Nakamura  1-0431998Nassau CC-chE97 King's Indian
24. Nakamura vs S Barrientos Chavarriaga  0-1631998Wch U12B23 Sicilian, Closed
25. Nakamura vs A Kim  0-1451998Wch U12B23 Sicilian, Closed
 page 1 of 190; games 1-25 of 4,749  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Nakamura wins | Nakamura loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 28 OF 29 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-07-25  Muttley101: It's ironic that Hikaru is being criticised for playing these tournaments to secure a rating-based spot in the 2026 candidates- one criticism said that the rating spot should be based on rating gained by playing against elite players in the top 100- but that's exactly how Hikaru gained his place as current number 2 in the world on rating, and would qualify for the spot if not overtaken at his current rating! He's playing the games because FIDE stipulates at least 40 rated games be played in the defined period for determining the place on rating. So, Hikaru is just meeting that requirement- he's already qualified based on his current rating if no-one overtakes him.

No qualification system is perfect. Even Bent Larsen once complained that the Leningrad Interzonal was much stronger than the Petropolis one in 1973, and therefore not fair as it was a harder task for him to qualify from Leningrad for the candidates' matches. But as Bent Larsen said when asked why he didn't play a match for the world championship, he would have, if there wasn't 5 or 6 Soviet players who were stronger than him. In the end, winning games determines the challenger.

Sep-07-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: But is Nakamura being criticised by the majority? He is playing well within the rules.

I think it's brilliant. He is a rebel rocking the leaky FIDE boat. Earlier this year he called on chess players to boycott FIDE events over the 'Freestyle' controversy.

The good news is FIDE must be considering closing the rating door and finding another way for players to qualify for the candidates. Another FIDE Swiss would not go amiss.

Ratings play their part, they are not ignored. The top 100 as of November 2024 qualified for the FIDE Swiss which is going on at the moment.

Ratings (up to July 2025) allowed 177 players straight into the World Cup, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess...

Sep-07-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Iowa Open Championship (2025)

<Back on the ROAD TO THE CANDIDATES 2026> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E5...

Sep-08-25  macer75: 11 wins in a row so far! This guy is about to pull a Fischer!
Sep-08-25  dehanne: By farming minnows soon he'll be as big as Stockfish.
Sep-08-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: He could end up being the state champion of every state in the USA...The Iowa State Champion will be in the candidates, has that ever happened before?
Sep-08-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: If he turned up here, I might even play that event, for the first time in 25 years.
Sep-12-25  Albertan: Here’s Why Hikaru Nakamura ,thé world’s number 2 chess player,is gaming thé system with “Mickey Mouse” tournaments:

https://sports.yahoo.com/olympics/b...

Sep-12-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Nakamura is not 'gaming tea' (gaming thé); he is operating within the rules as designed by FIDE in their infinite wisdom. Were he not doing so, there would be those slagging his naivete in not engaging in this exploit.
Sep-12-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: Nakamura is open about what he is doing. He needs rated classical games to qualify for the candidates, so he is finding them where he can.

Each win games him less than one rating point, so it wouldn't be a good strategy. And should he concede a draw (he's been close), he would lose much of what he's gained.

Sep-12-25  Olavi: Nothing wrong with what he is doing - he stands a much better chance of making the candidates this way than for instance at the Grand Swiss. He will easily find the necessary games until the end of the year. If he times it right, he can afford to lose something little.
Sep-16-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: The Times of India, 10th September.

'Five-time World Champion and World No. 1 chess player Magnus Carlsen has never been one to sugarcoat his opinions, and this time his comments were directed at long-time rival Hikaru Nakamura.'

"I kind of admire the way he's going about it because it's so shameless, it's the pragmatic and probably the right thing to do..."
“It looks like it's a system that could do with some fixing but I'm not part of that s*** anymore.”

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...

Sep-16-25  visayanbraindoctor: <Sally Simpson: The Times of India, 10th September. 'Five-time World Champion and World No. 1 chess player Magnus Carlsen has never been one to sugarcoat his opinions, and this time his comments were directed at long-time rival Hikaru Nakamura.'

"I kind of admire the way he's going about it because it's so shameless, it's the pragmatic and probably the right thing to do..." “It looks like it's a system that could do with some fixing but I'm not part of that s*** anymore.”>

I kind of admire the way Carlsen bluntly puts it.

Sep-16-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: <visayanbraindoctor>

He never hides how he feels and tells it like how he sees it. The system does need tweaking and Nakamura is well within the rules.

Sep-16-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Such candour from Carlsen is in distinct contrast to his oft-seen passive-aggressive approach; qv, his turning up at the finish of a Candidates event or the way he handled l'affaire Niemann.
Sep-24-25  visayanbraindoctor: A previous post of mine:

On ratings:

Elo ratings reflect relative and not absolute chess strength.

Chess players are naturally arranged in populations partitioned by geopolitical regions and time periods that have infrequent contacts with one another. Within such a population, players get to play each other more frequently, thus forming a quasi-equilibrium group wherein individual ratings would tend to equilibrate quickly; but not with outside groups. With caveats and in the proper context, FIDE/Elo ratings are simply fallible descriptors and predictors of an active player's near-past and near-future performances against other rated players, and only within the same quasi-equilibrium group.

As corollaries: the best way to evaluate a player's strength is to analyze his games and not his ratings; one cannot use ratings to accurately compare the quality of play of players from the past and present, or even the same player a decade ago and today; and <care should be taken in the use of ratings as a criterion in choosing which players to seed into the upper levels of the World Championship cycle.> All the above often entail comparisons between players from different quasi-equilibrium groups separated by space and/or time.

Regarding inflation deniers, they imply that Elo ratings reflect absolute and not relative chess strength. Professor Elo himself would condemn their view. If the top 20 players were to suffer a serious brain injury and begin playing like patzers, but play no one else for the next decade, they would more or less retain their 2700s ratings, although they would be playing terrible patzerish chess.

Sep-24-25  Muttley101: Regarding <visayanbraindoctor> post on Elo ratings:

It's described as a previous post (date when posted would have been useful), so possibly old and definitely outdated.

So, addressing this:

1) Chess players are no longer limited by location regarding who they play. Leaving aside the internet, OTB opportunities include national and international events, of which there have been decades of international events and opens players can travel to. Author describes "statistical inbreeding" to explain depressed ratings, which is correct, but not true of the chess world currently for IM/GM players who are active internationally.

2) "care should be taken for in the use of ratings for criterion in choosing which players to seed into the upper levels of the World Champioship cycle." Currently FIDE reserves on place in the candidates tournament for the top rated player meeting the requirement of minimum number of rated games played in defined preceding period- that is, controlling for players who stop playing because they attain a high Elo. So care has been taken to ensure this is robust method of ensuring a strong chess player who is a potential world champion challenger is included in the Candidates if they do not qualify by other performance-based means.

3) " If the top 20 players were to suffer a serious brain injury and begin playing like patzers, but play no one else for the next decade, they would more or less retain their 2700s ratings, although they would be playing terrible patzerish chess."

This is called a "straw man argument", which is a set of unrealistic premises set out to try to support an argument. It is obviously unrealistic from beginning to end, with the key point being "if the top 20 only played each other for the next decade" to try to show how the Elo system is fallible. They haven't, and they won't.

In the end, ratings are a measure of performance in a population and have their uses and limitations, but characterising FIDE Elo ratings in the way above doesn't reflect the real world.

Sep-24-25  visayanbraindoctor: <Muttley101: Regarding Chess players are no longer limited by location regarding who they play.>

If I must say so, they still are. For example, Chinese players mostly play only in China, and so probably form a quasi-equilibrium group separate from European based players.

It's also true for Philippine chess players, who can barely afford to play abroad in Europe. Contact with European players or even Chinese players are at the extreme minimum. So Philippine chess players also form a quasi-equilibrium group by their own.

The same is true for many Asian and African countries. They lack opportunities to play higher rated players in Europe. Most simply lack the money to go to Europe. Thus, it's more difficult to attain higher ratings.

Americans more often go to Europe, and so probably belong to the same quasi-equilibrium group as Europeans.

<FIDE reserves on place in the candidates tournament for the top rated player meeting the requirement of minimum number of rated games played in defined preceding period- that is, controlling for players who stop playing because they attain a high Elo. So care has been taken to ensure this is robust method of ensuring a strong chess player who is a potential world champion challenger is included in the Candidates if they do not qualify by other performance-based means.>

That's good news.

On the other hand, <The same is true for many Asian and African countries. They lack opportunities to play higher rated players in Europe. Most simply lack the money to go to Europe. Thus, it's more difficult to attain higher ratings.> still holds true.

For this reason I believe that the zonals and interzonal system that don't use ratings affords more opportunities for these players in Asia and Africa that belong to quasi-equilibrium groups with lower average ratings.

<"If the top 20 players were to suffer a serious brain injury and begin playing like patzers, but play no one else for the next decade, they would more or less retain their 2700s ratings, although they would be playing terrible patzerish chess."

This is called a "straw man argument">

Allow me to say it's not a strawman argument at all. It's a valid thought experiment that delves on the issue. With your reasoning that <It is obviously unrealistic from beginning to end> you'd end up also calling most of Einstein's hypothetical thought experiments as "strawman arguments" since they are quite unrealistic in the sense they don't happen in reality. Strawman arguments simply veer off the topic entirely, and that's not the case here.

Sep-24-25  VerySeriousExpert: Was Hikaru Nakamura right in his rapturous words about the standard system of the Jerome gambit? Yury V. Bukayev has made the following new part of his analysis of Jerome gambit and found that Mr. Nakamura was right:

https://jeromegambit.blogspot.com/2...

Sep-24-25  Albertan: Did a US Chess Champion Cheat?

https://en.chessbase.com/post/did-a...

Sep-24-25  stone free or die: <Albertan>'s link is good, but I think the conclusions should be cited for even-handedness (is that a word?):

<Conclusion

The research concludes that Nakamura’s winning streak is best explained by his exceptional skill and a real but rare statistical occurrence, not by cheating. It urges careful, critical interpretation of statistical evidence to avoid damaging reputations based on flawed reasoning.>

So, to answer the question - no.

Sep-24-25  stone free or die: Aside - While not as old as many on <CG>, I am old enough to recall the days when <Bayesian> was never mentioned in chess discussions!
Sep-24-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: In short: Kramnik is an eejit who relentlessly plays the <J'accuse!> angle.

Same dog, only washed....

Sep-24-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <As a starting point, the researchers needed an estimate of the level of cheating that occurs in online chess games. Viswanathan Anand, deputy president of the World Chess Federation, stated in a 2022 discussion with the Hindustan Times that the number of online chess games in which cheating occurs “must be 1 in 10,000.” Using this estimated probability as an initial measure, they were able to calculate the high likelihood of Nakamura’s innocence.>

https://www.chicagobooth.edu/review...

What does a general estimate of the cheating rate have to do with the likelihood that Nakamura cheated?

Sep-24-25  Muttley101: <visayanbraindoctor: Muttley101: Regarding Chess players are no longer limited by location regarding who they play.

If I must say so, they still are. For example, Chinese players mostly play only in China, and so probably form a quasi-equilibrium group separate from European based players.>

* cough *
* Ding Liren has entered the chat *
* cough *
* Ju Wenju has entered the chat *
* cough *

Literally both world champions were (and one still is) Chinese, two Chinese players contested the match for the women's world championship, and there are plenty of other examples of Chinese players on the international arena. Could you be more wrong?

As it turns out, yes, you could. And the reason is that China has, for decades, been inviting strong Western chess players to play in events in China. Who, for example?

* cough *
* Magnus Carlsen has entered the chat *

Magnus Carlsen has played in Chinese chess tournaments, against Chinese chess players, as have many other strong professional GMs, for, as said, literally decades- going back to 1987 at least. Clearly, the bit you were unaware of (and apparently still are) is that China has had an active program for decades of inviting strong GMs to play in China so Chinese players could get the experience of playing them. Planes fly in both directions, who knew.

<It's also true for Philippine chess players, who can barely afford to play abroad in Europe. Contact with European players or even Chinese players are at the extreme minimum. So Philippine chess players also form a quasi-equilibrium group by their own.

The same is true for many Asian and African countries. They lack opportunities to play higher rated players in Europe. Most simply lack the money to go to Europe. Thus, it's more difficult to attain higher ratings.>

* Le Quang Liem has entered the chat *

Also, you want to have it both ways. You emphasised that evaluating a player's playing strength should be through the study of their games, and yet say "Thus, it's more difficult to attain higher ratings." Perhaps studying more instead of being concerned with ratings should be their priority then?

I agree with you about the inequality of the routes to the candidates, but to their credit FIDE does have the World Cup- with the most candidate places- 3. 128 players is more than double when there were 3 interzonals. But all the same, the interzonals gave a greater opportunity to play a range of players across the world in a significant set number of games. So yes, I agree, but the problem is funding. What are the countries you are talking about doing to fund chess? The Chinese, as described above, took the bull by the horns and developed opportunities by organising events and inviting strong players from overseas, as well as developing systematic training, and even making chess a compulsory subject in school. There is an onus on a country to develop opportunities at home and support promising players. In the end though, players qualify for the candidates and a world championship match by winning games, whatever the system and their rating. And if they don't because they lose games, it's not because their rating is artificially low.

<"If the top 20 players were to suffer a serious brain injury and begin playing like patzers, but play no one else for the next decade, they would more or less retain their 2700s ratings, although they would be playing terrible patzerish chess."

This is called a "straw man argument"

Allow me to say it's not a strawman argument at all. It's a valid thought experiment that delves on the issue. With your reasoning ... you'd end up also calling most of Einstein's hypothetical thought experiments as "strawman arguments" since they are quite unrealistic in the sense they don't happen in reality. Strawman arguments simply veer off the topic entirely, and that's not the case here.>

Einstein's thought experiments? That veers off the topic of chess ratings entirely. So it's a strawman argument according to your definition. Also, you're wrong about Einstein's thought experiments- they were ways of looking at and evaluating physics that couldn't be done by standard experimental techniques at the time.

Call it a strawman or not, but positing that the top 20 all suffer brain damage and only play each other for a decade and so keep their ratings is a ridiculous example that has nothing to do with reality- the reality is that top players don't just play each other, they also play a range of other GMs (and sometimes IMs) in various events, and they keep their ratings by winning. Also, did you do any math to investigate your claim that all 20 keep their rating? It's doable, after all.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 29)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 28 OF 29 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC