chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Hikaru Nakamura
Nakamura 
 

Number of games in database: 3,906
Years covered: 1995 to 2025
Last FIDE rating: 2804 (2734 rapid, 2837 blitz)
Highest rating achieved in database: 2816
Overall record: +593 -246 =721 (61.1%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 2346 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (271) 
    B90 B30 B23 B51 B42
 Ruy Lopez (172) 
    C65 C67 C78 C77 C84
 Reti System (147) 
    A06 A04 A05
 Queen's Gambit Declined (119) 
    D37 D31 D38 D30 D35
 Queen's Pawn Game (115) 
    A45 D00 D02 E10 D05
 Nimzo Indian (77) 
    E32 E46 E34 E21 E20
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (251) 
    B90 B30 B80 B22 B92
 Ruy Lopez (247) 
    C67 C65 C70 C78 C72
 Queen's Gambit Declined (155) 
    D37 D31 D30 D06 D39
 Queen's Pawn Game (123) 
    D02 A40 A45 A41 A46
 King's Indian (114) 
    E97 E90 E92 E63 E94
 Giuoco Piano (107) 
    C53 C50 C54
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Krasenkow vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Gelfand vs Nakamura, 2010 0-1
   Rybka vs Nakamura, 2008 0-1
   So vs Nakamura, 2015 0-1
   G Sagalchik vs Nakamura, 2003 0-1
   Crafty vs Nakamura, 2007 0-1
   Nakamura vs Karjakin, 2004 1-0
   Nakamura vs Kramnik, 2012 1-0
   Nakamura vs J W Loyte, 2001 1-0
   A Beliavsky vs Nakamura, 2009 0-1

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Corsica Masters (2007)
   Trophee CCAS (2008)
   Magnus Carlsen Invitational (2020)
   Meltwater Tour Final (2021)
   Bullet Chess Championship (2023)
   Ordix Open (2009)
   Chess.com Speed Chess Championship 2017/18 (2017)
   Magnus Carlsen Chess Tour Finals (2020)
   New In Chess Classic (2021)
   Tata Steel India (2022)
   Champions Showdown (2019)
   chess.com Speed Chess (2020)
   Chess.com SpeedChess Finals (2024)
   Pro Chess League (2018)
   PRO League Group Stage (2019)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Naka's Nook Mistook Fredthebear stan theo by fredthebear
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 212 by 0ZeR0
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 243 by 0ZeR0
   Notable Nakamura Games by caracas1970
   book: Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by Baby Hawk
   Fighting Chess with Hikaru Nakamura by kenilworthian
   Vid e o put Fredthebear in th is cent ury by fredthebear
   Notable Nakamura Games by iron maiden
   2020 The Corona Beer & Black Bears Matter Mo Ode by fredthebear
   Hikaru! by larrewl
   Match Nakamura! by docjan
   Match Nakamura! by amadeus

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 Norway Chess
   Nakamura vs Wei Yi (May-29-25) 1/2-1/2
   D Gukesh vs Nakamura (May-28-25) 1-0
   Nakamura vs Carlsen (May-27-25) 1/2-1/2
   Caruana vs Nakamura (May-26-25) 0-1
   Nakamura vs Carlsen (Apr-14-25) 1/2-1/2, unorthodox

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Hikaru Nakamura
Search Google for Hikaru Nakamura
FIDE player card for Hikaru Nakamura

HIKARU NAKAMURA
(born Dec-09-1987, 37 years old) Japan (federation/nationality United States of America)

[what is this?]

IM (2001); GM (2003). Hikaru Nakamura won the US Championship in 2004, 2009, 2012, 2015 and 2019. He was the world's second-ranked player as of October 2015. In July 2023, he married WGM Atousa Pourkashiyan.

Prodigy

Christopher Hikaru Nakamura was born December 9, 1987 in Hirakata in Osaka, Japan, to a Japanese father and an American mother. He is the younger brother of Asuka Nakamura. When he was two years old, he and his mother and brother moved to the United States. He started playing chess when he was seven, coached by his stepfather, Sunil Weeramantry. He was the youngest player in US history to defeat an International Master (Jay Bonin) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 0 months), to become a National Master (USCF) (10 years, 79 days), to defeat a Grandmaster (Arthur Bisguier) in a USCF-rated game (10 years, 117 days), and to become an IM (13 years, 2 months), although most of these records have subsequently been surpassed. In 2003 he became the USA's youngest-ever grandmaster (15 years, 2 months and 19 days), a record later broken by Fabiano Caruana and Ray Robson.

Championships

<Youth> In 2001 he won the World U14 championship.

<National> When he won the Chessmaster US Championship 2005 (2004) (on tiebreak from Alexander Stripunsky), he was the youngest player to win the US championship since Robert James Fischer. He also won the US Championship (2009) outright by half a point ahead of the joint runners-up Robert Hess and Alexander Onischuk, and the United States Championship (2012) outright by a full point ahead of the winner of the 2010 and 2011 events, Gata Kamsky. He won the national title for a fourth time when he took out the US Championship (2015) with 8/11, half a point ahead of the outright runner up Ray Robson.

<World championship cycle> Seeded number 87 and aged 16, Nakamura reached the final 16 in the FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004), defeating 46th seed Sergey Volkov, 19th seeded Aleksej Aleksandrov, and 51st seed Alexander Lastin in the preliminary rounds before bowing out to number 3 seed and finalist Michael Adams in the round of 16. He qualified to play in the World Cup (2013) through his rating, and defeated Peruvian WGM Deysi Estela Cori Tello in the first round, Azeri GM Eltaj Safarli in the second round and Indian GM Baskaran Adhiban in the third round, but was eliminated in the Round of 16 (fourth round) by Ukrainian GM Anton Korobov. He qualified by rating to participate in the World Cup (2015), and is doing so although he has already qualified for the Candidates Tournament of 2016 via the Grand Prix series of 2014-15. He defeated Richmond Phiri, Sam Shankland in the first two rounds, as well as Ian Nepomniachtchi in a third round thriller that Nakamura won in the deciding Armageddon blitz tiebreaker game after the three previous sets of rapid and blitz tiebreakers had been drawn. In the Round of 16 (the fourth round) he won against Michael Adams by 1.5-0.5 but lost to Pavel Eljanov in the quarter final, bowing out of the event.

<Grand Prix Series 2012-2013> He started the Grand Prix series with last at the FIDE Grand Prix London (2012). After bouncing back into contention with outright second in the FIDE Grand Prix Zug (2013), a poor showing at the FIDE Grand Prix Thessaloniki (2013) eliminated him from contention for the top 2 spots that would have qualified him for the 2014 Candidates Tournament. (1) He did however place 3rd behind Fabiano Caruana and Boris Gelfand in the FIDE Grand Prix Paris (2013) to accumulate 300 GP points and place 6th in the 2012-13 Grand Prix series. Subsequently, his only chance to play in the 2014 Candidates Tournament was to be nominated as the Organizer's wild card once the venue was settled, however this did not eventuate.

<Grand Prix Series 2014-2015> Nakamura competed in the first leg of the series at the FIDE Grand Prix Baku (2014), where he scored 6/11 to place 3rd-7th, half a point behind the joint leaders Caruana and Gelfand. He therefore kicked off with a GP tally of 82 points, representing the even distribution of points applicable to each place from 3rd to 7th. In the second leg of the series, namely the FIDE Grand Prix Tashkent (2014), he placed =2nd and stood in 2nd place overall, excellently situated to take advantage of the opportunity to qualify for the Candidates tournament in 2016. He took full advantage of this in FIDE Grand Prix Khanty-Mansiysk (2015), when he came =1st to qualify for the Candidates Tournament of 2016.

Standard tournaments

In 2005, he won the 7th Foxwoods Open (2005).

In 2007, he won both the National Open (2007) that was held in Las Vegas and the Casino de Barcelona (2007).

The following year, he beat Xiangzhi Bu in the play-off to win the Gibraltar Masters (2008) Masters Open with 8.0/10.

Nakamura tied for first with Evgeny Najer at the 37th World Open (2009) after taking two last-day byes, each worth half a point and won the Donostia Chess Festival (2009) in tiebreak over Ruslan Ponomariov.

In 2010, he came =4th at Corus Group A (2010), and was equal top scorer in the victorious Rising Stars team in the Rising Stars - Experience (2010) tournament. He scored 5/9 (+1 -0 =8) at the Tal Memorial (2010), placing =4th, and finished the year with =4th place in the London Chess Classic (2010).

Nakamura began 2011 by taking clear first place at the A-Group of the prestigious category 20 Tata Steel Group A (2011) (formerly Corus) with a 9/13 score (+6 -1 =6) and a 2880 performance rating, ahead of a powerful field including the world's top four players: World Champion Viswanathan Anand, Magnus Carlsen, Levon Aronian and former World Champion Vladimir Kramnik. In June 2011, Nakamura placed =3rd in the Bazna King's Tournament (2011), in July he scored 4.5/10 at Dortmund Sparkassen (2011), in August he came =1st in the 2011 US Open Championship with 7.5/9 and in October he came =3rd in the Grand Slam Chess Final (2011) with 5/10. The following month, he suffered a lapse in form at the category 22 Tal Memorial (2011), scoring 3/9 and coming last but recovered to finish 2011 with second place behind Kramnik at the category 20 London Chess Classic (2011), scoring +4 -1 =3 (TPR of 2887).

He started 2012 by coming =2nd (4th on count back) at the Reggio Emilia (2011), half a point behind Anish Giri, and then came =5th at Tata Steel Group A (2012), scoring 7.5/13 (+3 -1 =9). He followed up in April 2012 with 1st at the 6th Annual Grand Pacific Open held in British Columbia. He competed in the Tal Memorial (2012) held in June, scoring 4/9. In July/August 2012, Nakamura placed a solid =3rd at the Biel Chess Festival (2012), but underperformed at the European Club Cup (2012), although in October 2012, he recovered to some extent by winning the 4 player double round robin 16th Unive Tournament (2012) (crown group) with 4.5/6 (+3 -0 =3). Nakamura finished 2012 with a strong 3rd placement in the London Chess Classic (2012) behind Carlsen and Kramnik, adding enough rating points to restore him to the top 10.

2013 started with a modest 7/13 result for outright 6th at the Tata Steel Group A (2013) event. He then followed up in May 2013 with equal 2nd at the Norway Chess (2013) with 5.5/9, half a point behind Sergey Karjakin and 3rd on tiebreak behind Carlsen; he also placed =2nd with 6/9 at the preliminary Norway Chess (Blitz) (2013) held to determine the draw for the main tournament, and earned the right to play with the White pieces in 5 games out of 9. In June 2013, he contested the category 22 Tal Memorial (2013), and was outright leader after 6 rounds. However, he lost the last 3 game to place 6th with 4.5/9, winning more games (4) and losing more games (4) than any other player in the tournament. Soon after, he came =3rd in the Houston Open in July 2013. In September he played in the quadrangular double round robin category 22 Sinquefield Cup (2013), and was in contention for first place until the last round, when he drew against Gata Kamsky finishing second with 3.5/6 (+2 -1 =3; TPR 2863) behind Magnus Carlsen.

Nakamura's first event in 2014 was the category 20 Tata Steel Masters (2014) where he scored 5/11 (+2 -3 =6) to shed a few rating points for FIDE's February rating list. He next competed in the category 23 Zurich Chess Challenge (2014) in which he placed 4th with 2/5 after coming agonisingly close to defeating World Champion Magnus Carlsen. He came 2nd with 3.5/5 in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2014) which followed the standard time event, to remain in 4th in the overall event with the results of the standard and rapid events combined. In April, he participated in the inaugural Gashimov Memorial (2014), a category XXII 6-player DRR event inaugurated in honor of the late Azeri grandmaster, scoring 5/10 and placing =3rd behind Carlsen and Caruana. At the London Chess Classic (2014), he scored 2.5/5 to place 4th.

Nakamura's start to 2015 was to win the powerful Gibraltar Masters (2015) with 8.5/10 (+7 =3), and return a PB on his live rating and his new FIDE rating due in March. Despite cracking the 2800 barrier in the live ratings during the RR category 22 Zurich Chess Challenge (2015) held in February, he placed outright 2nd in the standard portion of the event behind Anand, ahead of Kramnik, Karjakin, Aronian and Caruana respectively. His second place in the Zurich Chess Challenge (Rapid) (2015) with 3/5 made him =1st with Anand in the overall event, but he won an Armageddon tiebreaker with the former World Champion to win first prize. His good form continued at the category 22 Norway Chess (2015) event, where he was undefeated to place =2nd (3rd on a narrow SB tiebreak), behind Topalov and alongside Anand with 6/9 and a TPR of 2900. In September he competed in the second leg of the inaugural Grand Chess Tour at Sinquefield Cup (2015), and finished equal second with 5/9 behind Aronian in what amounted to a par for rating performance. October saw Nakamura compete in the lucrative Millionaire Chess (2015) tournament, which he won after battling through a complicated tiebreak system that involved a playoff to decide a playoff for fourth, and then winning a knockout rapid game semi-final that was called after round 7 of 9 of the main standard time event. He finished the year with a poor performance at the London Chess Classic (2015) where he came in toward the bottom of the field after scoring 4/9.

He started 2016 with an upbeat result at the Gibraltar Masters (2016), winning first prize after a rapid and blitz game tiebreak that ended in an Armageddon victory against runner-up Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. He finished clear second at the
FIDE Grand Swiss (2023), scoring 8/11 (+5 =6 -0) and qualifying for the 2024 Candidates tournament.

Team Events

<Olympiads> Nakamura has represented the U.S. in the Olympiads of 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2014, helping his country to the bronze medal in 2006 and 2008. He scored 6/10 during the Khanty-Mansiysk Olympiad (2010) on top board for the USA and a performance rating of 2741 and 6/9 in the Istanbul Olympiad (2012), coming in fourth on top board. His overall score in Olympiads is 31 points accumulated in 49 games played.

<World Team Championship> Nakamura played board 1 for the USA at the World Team Championship (2010), scoring individual gold and team silver. He also played top board at the World Team Championship (2013), winning individual silver and helping his team to 4th place in the event.

<European Club Cup> He played top board for the SK Husek Vienna in the European Club Cup (2009) and top board for the Italian club Obiettivo Risarcimento Padova in 2012 and 2013, second board for the Italian club in 2014 and board 3 for the same club in 2015. He scored individual bronze in 2013 and 2014.

Rapids

Nakamura is one of the world's best rapid and blitz players, and the world's best bullet (one-minute) player. He regularly plays on the internet, usually at the ICC where he is the highest rated player (userid <Smallville>), and at Playchess, where he is known as <Star Wars>. He has set many rating records under different categories. In 2008, he challenged and broke blitz king Alexander Grischuk 's record at ICC of 3737, reaching 3750. Grischuk subsequently challenged Nakamura to a 20 game 3 minutes blitz match, which Nakamura took out convincingly by 14.5-5.5. (2) He also won the first ICC Open in 2011 ahead of over 2000 other contestants. (3)

In 2007, he won the annual Corsica Masters (2007), defeating Rustam Kasimdzhanov in the final. One of the most convincing demonstrations of Nakamura's ability as a rapid player was when he won the Trophee CCAS (2008), defeating Xiangzhi Bu, Anatoly Karpov and Vasyl Ivanchuk in the playoff matches to take first prize in a field that included Carlsen. Nakamura also defeated Carlsen to take out the BNbank Blitz (2009). He was runner-up to Ivanchuk at the Cap d'Agde (2010) in the playoff. He also defeated Rising Stars team mate Anish Giri for the right to play at Amber 2011.

In 2012, Nakamura won the trifecta of silver medals at the SportAccord World Mind Games (Men's Rapid) (2012), the World Mind Games (Men's Blitz) and the World Mind Games (Men's Blindfold) events. He closed out 2013 by winning the London Chess Classic (Knockout) (2013), defeating Gelfand in the final by 1.5-0.5, after qualifying for the final by winning the preliminary London Chess Classic (Group C) (2013).

In June 2014, he competed in both the World Rapid Championship (2014) and the World Blitz Championship (2014) that were held in Dubai. In the former, he scored a relatively meager 8.5/15, losing 40 rapid rating points, while he was much more successful in the latter, scoring 16/21, being the runner up by a point behind the winner Magnus Carlsen. His blitz rating skyrocketed to over 2900. Subsequently he competed in the Super Rapidplay Open that was a companion event to the 2014 London Classic (see above), winning the event with an almost perfect score of 9.5/10. He also competed in the London Elite Player Blitz that was the other companion event, and placed =1st with 6/10.

The 2016 edition of the Zurich Chess Challenge was a two-part event, which kicked off with a preliminary Zurich Chess Challenge (Opening Blitz) (2016) to determine who had three whites in the five rounds of the Zurich Chess Challenge (2016) (rapid). Nakamura placed first in the Opening Blitz earning the use of the white pieces in three of the five rounds of the first section of the actual tournament, the round robin rapid event where he placed equal first alongside Anand. Nakamura playing the black pieces three times in the second section of the event, the Zurich Chess Challenge (Blitz) (2016), again placed equal first with Anand to tie the overall score, but won on tiebreak to take first prize.

He has authored the book Bullet Chess: One Minute to Mate.

Matches

In December 2004, Nakamura played the best-of-six game Karjakin - Nakamura Match (2004) in the "Duelo de los Jovenes Prodigios" (Duel of the Wonder Boys) in Cuernavaca, Estado de Morelos, Mexico, winning 4.5-1.5 (+4 -1 =1). In May 2011 at the St Louis chess club, he won the Nakamura - Ponomariov Match (2011) by 3.5-2.5 (+2 =3 -1). In June 2014, he played for the Cez Trophy Navara - Nakamura Match (2014) in Praha, Czechia, which involved a 4-game standard time match against David Navara. He won the match by 3.5-0.5.

960 Chess

In August 2009, Nakamura defeated Aronian in Mainz, Germany to become the 960 world champion and remained unchallenged as such until Carlsen defeated him in a match in February 2018 by a margin of 14-10.

Ratings and rankings

Nakamura's highest ranking as a Junior (U20) was #3 in April 2004 and 2005. He first broke into the world's top 100 in October 2004 when he was still 16 years old, and has remained in the top 100 continuously since that time. He reached the world's top 10 in January 2011, and has remained in that elite group continuously since January 2013. In September 2015 his rating reached 2814 despite which he was still ranked world #4 behind Carlsen, Anand and Topalov respectively. However in October 2016, his ranking reached its highest point so far, 2816, when his ranking was world #2, his highest ranking so far.

Sources and references

(1) Wikipedia article: FIDE Grand Prix 2012–2013 (2) http://dod.ru/chess/game/Crest/Smal...; (3) Further details are at this post: Hikaru Nakamura; (4) https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast... (podcast interview by Ben Johnson through iTunes); Live rating list: http://www.2700chess.com/; Wikipedia article: Hikaru Nakamura

Last updated: 2024-04-14 20:46:42

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 157; games 1-25 of 3,906  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. S Predescu vs Nakamura 1-0641995U.S. National Scholastic Grade 2 ChampionshipB08 Pirc, Classical
2. L Au vs Nakamura 1-0431997Hawaii opB83 Sicilian
3. Nakamura vs J Bonin 1-0361997Marshall Chess ClubC02 French, Advance
4. J Kleinman vs Nakamura  ½-½411997January CongressA49 King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4
5. Nakamura vs B Karen 0-1521997Nassau FuturityB06 Robatsch
6. A Bisguier vs Nakamura 0-1211998Somerset ACN Action SwissE70 King's Indian
7. B Karen vs Nakamura  0-1261998Nassau g/30B23 Sicilian, Closed
8. A Stripunsky vs Nakamura 0-1431998Marshall Chess ClubB40 Sicilian
9. P MacIntyre vs Nakamura  1-0541998US Amateur Team EastA07 King's Indian Attack
10. J Thinnsen vs Nakamura 1-035199899th US OpenA45 Queen's Pawn Game
11. Nakamura vs I Krush 1-062199899th US OpenB67 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...a6 Defense, 8...Bd7
12. S Kriventsov vs Nakamura  1-0241999Rated TournamentB80 Sicilian, Scheveningen
13. Nakamura vs J Fang 0-12119998th Eastern Class ChampionshipsB73 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
14. A David vs Nakamura  1-025199927th World OpenB92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
15. Nakamura vs W Paschall  ½-½251999North Bay OpenB65 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...Be7 Defense, 9...Nxd4
16. J Hebert vs Nakamura  1-0601999North Bay OpenE97 King's Indian
17. Nakamura vs V Rajlich  1-0521999North Bay OpenB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
18. G Taylor vs Nakamura  1-0311999North Bay OpenE75 King's Indian, Averbakh, Main line
19. Nakamura vs F Baragar  0-1451999North Bay OpenC17 French, Winawer, Advance
20. M Stroud vs Nakamura  0-1371999North Bay OpenE92 King's Indian
21. S Glinert vs Nakamura  ½-½381999North Bay OpenA07 King's Indian Attack
22. D Moody vs Nakamura 0-1201999100th US OpenB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
23. Nakamura vs A Aleksandrov ½-½601999100th US OpenC45 Scotch Game
24. A Wojtkiewicz vs Nakamura 1-0421999100th US OpenE62 King's Indian, Fianchetto
25. Nakamura vs G Gaiffe 1-0541999100th US OpenB23 Sicilian, Closed
 page 1 of 157; games 1-25 of 3,906  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Nakamura wins | Nakamura loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 91 OF 858 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-12-07  Strongest Force: I dont think he will ever quit blitz chess on the internet. ;)
Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <he defeated Karjakin 4.5-1.5 in their match in Dec. 2004, he doesn't get near the invites that Karjakin gets, yet some people still rationalize this by saying that Karjakin is better and completly ignoring their one-on-one match> There is nothing unsusual in ignoring a match which took place 3 years ago (btw back then Nakamura was also higher rated than Karjakin).
Jul-13-07  VinnyRoo2002: <alexmagnus> I was waiting for someone to use this argument. First off, completely ignoring a match that took place two and a half years ago when no return match has been played is unusual. And if the reason for ignoring the result is that Karjakin has surpassed Nakamura in rating, couldn't it be argued that Karjakin has surpassed Nakamura because Karjakin is playing against higher rated players in these super-tournaments. I mean Nakamura isn't getting the opportunities that Karjakin is to improve his game against tougher competition.
Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  JointheArmy: <And if the reason for ignoring the result is that Karjakin has surpassed Nakamura in rating, couldn't it be argued that Karjakin has surpassed Nakamura because Karjakin is playing against higher rated players in these super-tournaments. >

Not really. Nakamura can improve other ways than just playing against tougher competition, like actually dedicating himself to work on chess professionally rather than whining about he doesn't get enough chances. Also who says he would do as well as Karjakin anyways.

I see Karjakin news about him studying with Nigel in Greece and wanting to improve, the only thing I see Nakamura doing is complaing about his lack of sponsors and making claims he would beat Karjakin in match and draw Carlsen.

Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: The rating system is designed so that no matter who you play your rating will be "correct".
Jul-13-07  percyblakeney: Mamedyarov got his first invitation to a top tournament as last minute replacement in Corus 2006, when he was 2700+. Not easy to get those invitations.
Jul-13-07  VinnyRoo2002: <alexmagnus> I understand how the rating system is designed, but that is just theory, in practice is that accurate? For example, if Kasparov spent his whole career playing 2500 rated playes, would he ever have gotten to 2800+? Kasparov himself admits that playing his matches with Karpov improved his chess skill a great deal. Imagine that Nakamura gets to play a match against Kramnik (I realize this is not happening anytime soon, but this example proves my point) are you telling me that Nakamura won't improve in playing strength even if his rating stays unchanged?

<JointheArmy> How do you know that Nakamura isn't dedicating himself to working on chess? I understand that the GMs I am going to mention aren't super-GMs, but it would be an insult to GMs like Shabalov, Akobian, Ehlvest, Kaidanov, etc. to say that Nakamura can regularly defeat players like this without studying chess.

Also, you cite the fact that Karjakin is studying with Nigel and "wanting to improve." Have you ever heard Nakamura say he doesn't want to improve? In fact, the latest Chess Life quotes him with some of his goals and all of them are related to getting better. Just because he doesn't study with a GM like Nigel Short doesn't mean he doesn't take his chess studies seriously. I mean he's gotten to the level that he's currently at without a GM coach, and I believe he can improve even more using the same method IF he would get some invitations to these top tier tournaments where he'll get to play better players who more thoroughly understand chess.

<percyblakeney> How old is Mamedyarov? If he is significantly older than Nakamura, I believe Nakamura should get the nod over him simply due to his youth and probability of improvement. Additionally, it sticks with the current theme in chess of promoting young players like Radjabov, Carlsen, and Karjakin even though there are players rated higher than them who aren't getting invited to these top tournaments.

After finishing in the top 16 and losing to Adams in the World Championship knockout, I believe that Nakamura earned a chance to compete with the elite. Also, adding Nakamura to a tournament will create a lot more buzz than adding Mamedyarov, simply because enough Europeans are playing in these tournaments, and the addition of one American will do a lot to promote chess. I feel like this should also be a part of the equation.

Jul-13-07  I3illieJoe: If Nakamura quits chess or not, I really don't care. My preference is still for Carlsen, the low-profile humble genius.
Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Look, I just can't bring myself to care about Nakamura very much. No one is <ignoring> his win over Karjakin, but it's hard to get too excited about it given that (i) it was almost three years ago (ii) Karjakin was 14 at the time.

I have no idea how hard Nakamura works at chess. But I doubt he is working in such a way to make progress towards super-GM status because (i) his results don't show it and (ii) he plays too much junk in the opening.

<For example, if Kasparov spent his whole career playing 2500 rated playes, would he ever have gotten to 2800+?>

Sorry, this is just silly. Kasparov was never going to spend his whole career playing 2500s because by the time he was 17, he was making mincemeat out of them, and 2600s too. If Nakamura (who is almost 20, by the way) does the same, he'll quickly find himself getting invited to play stronger opponents.

Of course, Nakamura can do whatever he wants. He's under no obligation to me or anyone else. He can go to college, he can play blitz 24 hours a day. But am I supposed to be offended that he's not invited to Corus?

<Also, adding Nakamura to a tournament will create a lot more buzz than adding Mamedyarov, simply because enough Europeans are playing in these tournaments, and the addition of one American will do a lot to promote chess.>

Yeah, Kamsky really brings the crowds, doesn't he?

Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <I understand that the GMs I am going to mention aren't super-GMs, but it would be an insult to GMs like Shabalov, Akobian, Ehlvest, Kaidanov, etc. to say that Nakamura can regularly defeat players like this without studying chess.>

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

"Regularly defeat"? According to cg.com he's got a 50% score against the group. You think he studies chess, right? So if he studies chess and has an even score against these guys, he's probably not supertournament material, is he?

Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  JointheArmy: <VinnyRoo> See <keypusher>'s post for my response.
Jul-13-07  VinnyRoo2002: <keypusher> You have an excellent point on the 50% score against the group of players I mentioned. However, the sample size of games is small, and Nakamura is rated higher than all of those players despite playing VERY similar opposition. Exactly the opposite of comparing Nakamura and Karjakin's rating. So I don't think this discounts his place as supertournament material.

<Kasparov was never going to spend his whole career playing 2500s because by the time he was 17, he was making mincemeat out of them, and 2600s too.>

In the 2004 FIDE World Championships, Nakamura defeated 3 players all rated over 2600. How old was he at the time? 17! How many players has he played over 2600 since? I'm not sure, but I can guarantee it isn't even close to the amount that Kasparov played from the ages of 17 to 20.

<I doubt he is working in such a way to make progress towards super-GM status because (i) his results don't show it and (ii) he plays too much junk in the opening.>

I dispute argument (ii) because Nakamura reminds me a lot of Morozevich in this regard. Many people say Morozevich's opening play is junk, but I view it as creative. Maybe you can't become a world champ playing like that, but Morozevich has proved that you can become a super-GM playing different openings. As for his results, results come over time. Give him more games against elite players and a trend will emerge with his score slowly improving. I'm not sure how good Nakamura can be, but I believe he's already done enough to be given an opportunity.

<Yeah, Kamsky really brings the crowds, doesn't he?>

I understand that Kamsky and Nakamura are both American and I also know that my next point is going to be disputed due to political correctness, but Nakamura represents what America is about a lot more than Kamsky. I mean Nakamura is brash, cocky, doesn't need help from others (very similar to Fischer in this regards), he is young, and doesn't try to fit into any mold. For proof of his popularity compared to Kamsky's, one can look to chessgames.com where Nakamura has 91 pages of kibitzes whereas Kamsky only has 43. And Kamsky is a former world championship contender whereas Nakamura hasn't come close to that level. If Nakamura was in Corus, I guarantee it would get a big following on chessgames.com. If Nakamura had a good showing at Corus, chess in the states might even get a bit of media attention. If Kamsky won Corus, it would never get mentioned outside of chessgames.com and other chess websites. All I want is for Naka to get a chance, he was ranked 39th in the world in the April 2007 rating list and to give him an invite to ONE supertournament when there are several a year isn't too much to ask for.

Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <How old is Mamedyarov? If he is significantly older than Nakamura, I believe Nakamura should get the nod over him simply due to his youth and probability of improvement. Additionally, it sticks with the current theme in chess of promoting young players like Radjabov, Carlsen, and Karjakin even though there are players rated higher than them who aren't getting invited to these top tournaments.>

Here we have three completely different age groups. Carlsen and Karjakin(born 1990), Radjabov and Nakamura (born 1987) and Mamedyarov (born 1985). Considering how young they all are (especially the first four), the 3-5 years difference is quite big...

Jul-13-07  cotdt: i've seen nakamura play and while he is good tactically, his positional ideas leave much to be desired and this is noticeable in his losses against the stronger players. i prefer the way kamsky plays chess.
Jul-13-07  Prugno: So, Nakamura never gets invited to closed tournaments, eh? Discounting the last year which he apparently spent at college (probably declining some invitations along the way), here are just a few cases in point: Cuernavaca 2006, Stepanakert, Biel and Malmo 2005, Wijk aan Zee II and Lausanne 2004, Pamplona 2003, and I stop here but there were others previously (Bermuda, etc.) All but the first were in Europe, by the way.

In practically all these tournaments he scored good but not exceptional performances - not a single clear first place, in fact.

My impression is that Nakamura gets more or less the kind of invitations you can expect from a player of his age and level of play, and I don't really see why so much fuss should be made on this matter.

Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <vinnyroo> <You have an excellent point on the 50% score against the group of players I mentioned. >

So what the hell was "regularly defeat" all about?

<However, the sample size of games is small, and Nakamura is rated higher than all of those players despite playing VERY similar opposition. Exactly the opposite of comparing Nakamura and Karjakin's rating. So I don't think this discounts his place as supertournament material.>

Great, so he's better than Kaidanov and worse than Karjakin. Hell, he's worse than Shabalov. Why are we bothering with this guy again?

<In the 2004 FIDE World Championships, Nakamura defeated 3 players all rated over 2600. How old was he at the time? 17! How many players has he played over 2600 since? I'm not sure, but I can guarantee it isn't even close to the amount that Kasparov played from the ages of 17 to 20.>

He's not playing people over 2600 that often because he's not beating people over 2500 consistently. I mean, come on! When Kasparov was Nakamura's current age he was winning an interzonal going away. Are you even being serious or are you just joking?

<Prugno: My impression is that Nakamura gets more or less the kind of invitations you can expect from a player of his age and level of play, and I don't really see why so much fuss should be made on this matter.>

Exactly.

Jul-13-07  acirce: Here is Gelfand speaking about Nakamura and others: http://www.chess-players.org/eng/ne...

<Nakamura is a player of a new generation. He does not hide, he shows off that he has not read a single book and does not know the endgame theory. Instead of studying the works of Tarrasch he prefers to be 24 hours on the ICC. However, he has convincing competitive results. This is a very interesting phenomenon.

Other young talents – Karjakin, Harikrishna,Volokitin – are playing normal classical chess. And the play of Nakamura is another dimension. I cannot judge his prospects. As I understand, at some point such a player stops progressing and it is already late to learn again. On the other hand, if one can bring to perfection the concrete play, “move by move”, maybe such an approach to chess turns out to be more effective?>

Well, could it be time to evaluate? This was more than 2 years ago, April 2005. Now it is July 2007, Nakamura is lower rated than he was then and is not any closer to breaking into the elite. Not saying rating is all but there are few signs of real progress.

Jul-13-07  Jim Bartle: Interesting comment from Gelfand.

Has Nakamura said anything concerning his long-term goals? Maybe he's happy with the where he is now...

Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Great, so he's better than Kaidanov and worse than Karjakin. Hell, he's worse than Shabalov. Why are we bothering with this guy again?>

Sorry, this sounds disrespectful to Kaidanov and Shabalov, who of course are wonderful players. I especially loved this game: Nakamura vs Shabalov, 2007

It's just that no one thinks it's a great injustice when the likes of Kaidanov or Shabalov don't get invited to Corus or Linares.

Jul-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: This is a pretty terrific game, too:

Nakamura vs Shabalov, 2007

Jul-13-07  VinnyRoo2002: I was wrong about the "regularly defeat." I thought that was clear, but apparently it wasn't. I should have done more research before posting that.

As for this whole argument, I believe it boils down to I believe he should be invited to more and better tournaments, and you agree with Prugno's POV. In my opinion, it is pointless to watch Vallejo-Pons and Van Wely constantly lose in these tournaments when a fresh face could do just as well. I don't understand why the same players who constantly finish in the bottom places get invited back. What's the incentive to perform well? I think that because of Nakamura's age and credentials (second place in Gibraltar ahead of Adams is impressive) should earn him a shot in a super-tournament. And this also might not be clear, but I think more players than just Nakamura should be getting invites. And I've already mentioned two names that could be dropped, so that two new names can be added (I have no preference for who, I just want to see some new blood). If Nakamura gets invited to ONE super-tournament I will be happy and content. If he does poorly, then fine don't invite him again, if he does well, then give him another shot. I just see no way for Nakamura to improve without getting to play the top competition (which I think he's earned). It's sad that some people don't care if Nakamura quits professional chess. He's one of the greatest American talents we've had, and just because he hasn't progressed from the ages of 17 to 19 like some had hoped or expected, we just give up on the guy? Maybe his next leap in playing strength will happen 2 years from now. In the meantime, I think as chess fans we should support this guy because when people like Kasparov name him as part of the future of chess, I think that should carry some weight.

Jul-14-07  WillC21: <VinnyRoo2002> The two names-- Vallejo-Pons and Van Wely-- you mentioned are the ones many people complain about. Unfortunately, I don't foresee that changing, as Vallejo-Pons and Van Wely are from Spain and Holland, respectively. Therefore, their ticket is fairly guaranteed for obvious reasons.

<I just see no way for Nakamura to improve without getting to play the top competition (which I think he's earned). It's sad that some people don't care if Nakamura quits professional chess.> This I am in 100% agreement with. But, when I talked with Hikaru's father the main message was not Hikaru's improvement and/or study habits, but rather APPEARED TO BE the fact that an ambitious, intelligent person in the U.S.(where chess is hardly on the radar) can make so much more money in so many other fields. Mr. Weeramantry did not expressly say those words or come across so clearly on the issue, as he seemed slightly uncomfortable in this facet of our conversation(perhaps I shouldn't have pressed the issue).

Perhaps also Hikaru's stepfather(like Hikaru) is somewhat resentful of Hikaru smashing Karjakin to a pulp yet not getting a crack at the very top echelon in the tournament hierarchy. I'm not agreeing or disagreeing but rather just trying to say what I sensed.

Jul-14-07  adair10: Does he have a manager?

He doesn't have to be invited to round robin tournaments. Nowdays there are several very strong opens where he can participate. He played in Gibraltar. Great. How about Aeroflot, Aratovsky. Big shots play in those tournaments. Other than chess skills he will have a chance to show his personality. Maybe organizers like him and invite to stronger events.

As far as his development, who knows when his peak will come. He is only 20 and clearly has the talent comparable to Carlsen, Karjakin, Radjabov.He is lagging now these folks in rankings, but again, he is only 20 and maybe in a couple of years we'll see him mentioned up there with other prodigies. Aronian and Mamedyarov were not rated higher at 20, but now are top 10 players.

Jul-21-07  WillC21: I think his stepfather serves as his "manager." Although it isn't a business relationship per say.

His peak may not be reached yet. I think he could be similar to the other youngsters you mention if he did three things:

<1> Cuts down the amount of blitz he plays(if he hasn't already done so) and doesn't move so quickly in classical games.

<2> Moves to Europe and plays for one of the strong German or French chess clubs, if possible and if he had enough desire to do so.

<3> Studied openings more seriously and played more serious(solid) openings.

Jul-21-07  unluckythirtyfive: I think we just have to accept that Nakamura won't ever be a contender for the WC. In fact, I think it will probably be a long time before an American even comes close again (besides Kamsky) with chess being so unpopular among american youth.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 858)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 91 OF 858 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC