Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Adolf Anderssen

ADOLF ANDERSSEN (born Jul-06-1818, died Mar-13-1879, 60 years old) Germany [what is this?] Karl Ernst Adolf Anderssen was born in Breslau. He was one of the strongest players of his day and was regarded by some to be the World Champion after his victory in the London (1851) tournament.1,2 He lost this honor in the Anderssen - Morphy (1858) match. One year later, however, Paul Morphy retired from international chess, and Anderssen was able to regain his reputation as the world's leading player, drawing Ignatz von Kolisch in Paris 1860 (+5 -5 =1),3 and winning the Anderssen - Kolisch (1861) match in London (+4 -3 =2). Anderssen also won the London International 1862 over Louis Paulsen, who finished second.2 He subsequently drew him in the Anderssen - Paulsen Match (1862) match (+3 -3 =2). In 1866, Anderssen narrowly lost a match with Wilhelm Steinitz (+6 -8 =0). He scored his final great success by winning the Baden-Baden (1870) tournament, ahead of Steinitz and Joseph Henry Blackburne. 4 Anderssen is regarded as the quintessential Romantic, and his sacrificial brilliancies such as The Immortal Game (Anderssen vs Kieseritzky, 1851) and The Evergreen Game (Anderssen vs Dufresne, 1852) have stood the test of time. However, Willy Hendriks in his book "The Ink Wars" argues that this view of Anderssen is too simplistic, and that games like "his very modern Sicilian victory" in Blackburne vs Anderssen, 1878 deserve more attention. Anderssen and Howard Staunton were two of the earliest champions of the Sicilian Defense. In his match against Morphy, he even originated Anderssen's Opening (1.a3) as a way of reaching the Sicilian with colors reversed (1.a3 e5 2.c4), with which he scored 1 1/2 out of 3 against Morphy. Anderssen died of a heart attack at age 60. During World War II, bombing raids on his hometown damaged his grave. Anderssen also played consultation chess on the teams of Adolf Anderssen / Johannes Zukertort / Dr C. Schmid, Adolf Anderssen / Allies, Anderssen / Stern, Anderssen / Goering / Allies & Adolf Anderssen / Bernhard Horwitz / Josef Kling. Notes: 1 Wikipedia article: Adolf Anderssen 2 http://www.mark-weeks.com/chess/v1l... 3 http://www.365chess.com/tournaments... 4 http://www.endgame.nl/bad1870.htm Last updated: 2023-01-25 08:20:57

Try our new games table.

page 1 of 34; games 1-25 of 842  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. H Seligo vs Anderssen 1-0 28 1844 Breslau C26 Vienna 2. von der Lasa vs Anderssen 1-0 21 1845 Breslau C44 King's Pawn Game 3. Anderssen vs von der Lasa 0-1 32 1845 Breslau C38 King's Gambit Accepted 4. von der Lasa vs Anderssen 1-0 48 1845 Breslau C39 King's Gambit Accepted 5. Anderssen vs von der Lasa 1-0 29 1845 Breslau B01 Scandinavian 6. Anderssen vs von der Lasa 0-1 28 1846 Breslau C37 King's Gambit Accepted 7. von der Lasa vs Anderssen 0-1 20 1846 Breslau B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4 8. Anderssen vs Harrwitz 0-1 30 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4 9. Harrwitz vs Anderssen 0-1 36 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz C33 King's Gambit Accepted 10. Harrwitz vs Anderssen 1-0 32 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz C44 King's Pawn Game 11. Harrwitz vs Anderssen 0-1 26 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz C33 King's Gambit Accepted 12. Anderssen vs Harrwitz 1-0 28 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4 13. Anderssen vs Harrwitz 0-1 34 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz D32 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch 14. Harrwitz vs Anderssen 0-1 50 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz C33 King's Gambit Accepted 15. Anderssen vs Harrwitz 1-0 37 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz C54 Giuoco Piano 16. Harrwitz vs Anderssen 0-1 38 1848 Blindfold exhibition game C39 King's Gambit Accepted 17. Anderssen vs Harrwitz 0-1 55 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz C01 French, Exchange 18. Harrwitz vs Anderssen 1-0 17 1848 Anderssen - Harrwitz C33 King's Gambit Accepted 19. Salpius vs Anderssen 1-0 37 1849 Berlin C52 Evans Gambit 20. Anderssen vs J Schlesinger 0-1 30 1849 Double blindfold game C02 French, Advance 21. N D Nathan vs Anderssen 0-1 22 1850 Casual game C39 King's Gambit Accepted 22. Dufresne vs Anderssen 1-0 35 1851 Casual game C52 Evans Gambit 23. A Mongredien vs Anderssen   1-0 20 1851 Casual game C24 Bishop's Opening 24. Anderssen vs Lowenthal 1-0 20 1851 Casual game C33 King's Gambit Accepted 25. Anderssen vs Horwitz ½-½ 32 1851 London Chess Club Invitational C33 King's Gambit Accepted  page 1 of 34; games 1-25 of 842

REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Anderssen wins | Anderssen loses

< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing> Jan-16-06    offramp: <FHBradley: <Swindler:> I believe Anderssen was a mathematics teacher in a Gymnasium, which, I suppose, is something like a high school.> In a gymnasium everyone is naked, not just most people. Jan-21-06    fred lennox: Just before the 1971 tournament a GM visited Fischer in his hotel room. He saw, to his surprisie, Fischer intensly going over the games of Adolf Anderssen. If one wants to study tactics one can't do better than study the romantic masters. That's not why Fisher did it of course. If your not inspired, if your imagination is not stirred, how can you expect to play your best. That, i believe, is why he did it. Jan-21-06    RodSerling: I've read a lot of Fischer stuff, never heard him comment about Andersson---are you sure this is 4 real? Jan-24-06    fred lennox: I am sure i read it. I will try to get the GM name in the next week. If not, I will have to cancel the story. Feb-11-06    fred lennox: Well, i couldn't find the GM, i do remember reading an interview Gligoric gave to Fischer winning the WC. Gligoric commented, on the 21st game about the newness of Fischers opening play. Fisher said it was't new, that he'd been studying the games of Adolf Anderssen and was impressed by the way he put bishops on d3 and e3. By the way, Anderseen was more thoughtful and adventerous towards Opening than he's usually given credit. Mar-17-06    AlexanderMorphy: why are those two gaes of his just so famous when it has been proved that it was mostly unsound play....yes to the named eye they are great games, great sacrifices etc but not as good when analysed...another thing i am annoyed at is the fact that kieseritzky is usually considered as the game who lost to anderssen in the immortal game, when in fact he had a + score against anderssen!!!! Mar-17-06    MrMojoRisin: The "Immortal Game" and "Evergreen" games are famous because they are beautiful swashbuckling attacks. At the time these two games were played, they were very unique, original, beautiful games (though IMO they have been surpassed by even more beautiful games like Rotlewi vs Rubinstein, 1907 and Karpov vs Kasparov, 1985). Mar-17-06    MrMojoRisin: Also personally I prefer the "Evergreen" game over the "Immortal" game. Mar-17-06    AlexanderMorphy: Kasparov has better less known games than the one against Karpov in 85... Apr-18-06    blackburne: Is Anderssen Better attack player of the history??. In a poll of Chess Attack... no 1- Tahl 87 p. 2- Fischer 44 p. 3- Alekhine 37 p. 4- Morphy 36 p. 5- Kasparov 27 p. ----------------- Vote for 3 players of the list with 3, 2 and 1 point respectively. The list with 21 players is in http://www.ajedrezdeataque.com/13%2... VOTE PLEASE Apr-21-06    chessmoron: Adolf Anderssen--creator of the stupidest opening of all time 1. a4 Apr-22-06    Holden: It was 1.a3 he liked, but only in his earlier years. Later in his career he "came to his senses" and gave it up. By the way, my vote for stupidest opening ever is 1.g4 Apr-23-06    SBC: <Holden> <chessmoron> The first time Anderssen is seen playing the Anderssen's Opening (1. a3) in this database is in 1858: Anderssen vs Morphy, 1858 The last time is in 1878: Anderssen vs J Mason, 1878 Since Anderssen was born in 1818, 1858 could hardly be consided his early years and since he died in 1879, he could hardly been said to have given it up in his later years. He also seems to have not played it very frequently, but did have good overall results with it. Apr-24-06    Holden: <SBC> Good point. I read that somewhere, can't recall where - I thought it was in My Great Predecessors I, but I couldn't find it. Obviously if he played it 1878 he never gave up the opening. May-16-06    TylerD: Kamsky s comeback suddenly looking so good got me thinking of the following Anderssen quote, which he made after his defeat by Morphy in 1858: "I was wrong in supposing that I could bottle up my chess and put it in a glass case." Yep, usually doesn t work... May-22-06    BishopBerkeley: Nicely done website on "Super Tournaments" contains many images I have not seen before. It opens with Baden-Baden 1870, which it presents as the first super tournament (Anderssen won.): http://www.endgame.nl/super.htm Baden-Baden 1870: http://www.endgame.nl/bad1870.htm Drawing of Adolf Anderssen I had not seen before, presented under "London 1851": http://www.endgame.nl/wfairs.htm Main "Chess Analyses" page: http://www.endgame.nl/ The site appears to be maintained by Jan van Reek . Bravo! (: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :) Jul-06-06    BIDMONFA: Adolf Anderssen ANDERSSEN, Adolf http://www.bidmonfa.com/anderssen_a... _ Feb-08-07    Joshka: Did Anderssen ever write about Morphy and what the chess world would have been like had he continued to play during the 60's and 70's. Would Steinitz have been World Champion were it not for Morphy being taken out of the equation? Would love to hear his views on these matters!:-)..thanks in advance Apr-22-07    Paul123: I'm convinced .....Take away computers and few GM's could hang with guys like Anderssen, Morphy...etc... May-19-07    Caissanist: <Joshka> For what it's worth, Irving Chernev quotes Anderssen as saying that Steinitz was better than Morphy after losing matches to both. May-19-07    Plato: <Caissanist> Evans confirms the same thing in "New Ideas in Chess" Which Chernev book is that from? May-21-07    Caissanist: I believe it was in "Wonders and Curiosities of Chess", but I don't have a copy of that book at hand so I can't say with any certainty. Oct-15-07    notyetagm: Judit Polgar vs F Berkes, 2003 Position after 13 ... h6x♘g5?! 14 g2-g4!: click for larger view Polgar has just sacrificed a whole piece(!) (a ♘) on g5 in order to form the <PAWN LEVER> of Black g5-pawn versus White g4-pawn, with the goal of eventually opening the h-file with h2-h4. I read at the time of this game that this idea (a piece sacrifice to create a <PAWN LEVER>) was first played in a game by the great Adolf Anderssen. Does anyone know which Anderseen game this is? Thanks Feb-20-08    Knight13: Well, this guy DID beat Morphy with 1. a3. So it can't be THAT bad. Mar-11-08    ketchuplover: Just 53 draws in 745 games. Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 9) search thread:    < Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC