chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz
Steinitz 
 

Number of games in database: 1,086
Years covered: 1859 to 1899
Overall record: +473 -192 =152 (67.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 269 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Vienna Opening (112) 
    C25 C29 C28 C27 C26
 French Defense (86) 
    C00 C11 C01 C10 C02
 King's Gambit Accepted (71) 
    C39 C37 C38 C33 C35
 French (51) 
    C00 C11 C10 C13 C12
 King's Gambit Declined (43) 
    C30 C31 C32
 Evans Gambit (30) 
    C51 C52
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (132) 
    C62 C70 C60 C64 C67
 Evans Gambit (74) 
    C52 C51
 Giuoco Piano (36) 
    C50 C53 C54
 King's Gambit Accepted (28) 
    C33 C39 C37 C38 C34
 Scotch Game (22) 
    C45
 Three Knights (16) 
    C46
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Steinitz vs von Bardeleben, 1895 1-0
   Steinitz vs Chigorin, 1892 1-0
   Steinitz vs A Mongredien, 1862 1-0
   S Dubois vs Steinitz, 1862 0-1
   S Rosenthal vs Steinitz, 1873 0-1
   Steinitz vs A Mongredien, 1862 1-0
   Zukertort vs Steinitz, 1886 0-1
   Steinitz vs Paulsen, 1870 1-0
   Steinitz vs A G Sellman, 1885 1-0
   Steinitz vs Lasker, 1896 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Steinitz - Zukertort World Championship Match (1886)
   Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Match (1889)
   Steinitz - Gunsberg World Championship Match (1890)
   Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Rematch (1892)
   Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894)
   Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Anderssen - Steinitz (1866)
   Steinitz - Green 1863/64 (1864)
   Bird - Steinitz (1866)
   Vienna (1873)
   Steinitz - Blackburne (1876)
   Vienna (1882)
   2nd City Chess Club Tournament (1894)
   Baden-Baden (1870)
   London (1883)
   St. Petersburg Quadrangular 1895/96 (1895)
   Paris (1867)
   Vienna (1898)
   Hastings (1895)
   Nuremberg (1896)
   London (1899)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   The t_t Players: Staunton, Steinitz & Zukertort by fredthebear
   Match Steinitz! by amadeus
   Match Steinitz! by docjan
   The Dark Side by lonchaney
   Stupendous Play from Steinitz' Day Lee by fredthebear
   World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
   World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by nbabcox
   Stupendous Play from Steinitz' Day by Okavango
   World championship games A-Z by kevin86
   The t_t Players: The 1900s rok file by fredthebear
   1883 Beyond London lks SP by fredthebear
   the rivals 1 by ughaibu
   y1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by plerranov
   y1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by fredthebear

GAMES ANNOTATED BY STEINITZ: [what is this?]
   Showalter vs Gossip, 1889
   J McConnell vs Steinitz, 1886
   Chigorin vs Gunsberg, 1889
   M Weiss vs N MacLeod, 1889
   Showalter vs Taubenhaus, 1889
   >> 130 GAMES ANNOTATED BY STEINITZ


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Wilhelm Steinitz
Search Google for Wilhelm Steinitz

WILHELM STEINITZ
(born May-14-1836, died Aug-12-1900, 64 years old) Austria (federation/nationality United States of America)
PRONUNCIATION:
[what is this?]

William (né Wolfgang, aka Wilhelm) Steinitz
Born: Prague, Bohemia, Austrian Empire
Died: New York, New York, United States

Wilhelm Steinitz is the earliest World Champion recognized by FIDE.

Background

The last of thirteen sons of a hardware retailer, he was born in Prague in what was then the Kingdom of Bohemia within the Austrian Empire and which is now within the Czech republic. Like his father he was a Talmudic scholar, but then he left to study mathematics in the Vienna Polytechnic. He eventually dropped out of the Polytechnic to play chess professionally. Soon after, he played in the London tournament of 1862, and then settled in London for over twenty years, making his living at the London Chess Club. He emigrated to the USA in 1883, taking out US citizenship, living in New York for the rest of his life, and changing his first name to "William".

Matches

He was recognized as the world's leading player, and considered to be the world champion by many, after he defeated the then-acknowledged number one chess player in the world (now that Paul Morphy had retired), Adolf Anderssen, in a match in 1866 which he won by 8-6. However, it was not until his victory in the Steinitz - Zukertort World Championship Match (1886) – where he sat beside a US flag - that he was recognised as the first undisputed world chess champion. He successfully defended his title three times in the Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Match (1889), the Steinitz - Gunsberg World Championship Match (1890), and in the Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Rematch (1892). In 1894, Emanuel Lasker won the crown from Steinitz by winning the Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894) and retained it by winning the Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896).

Steinitz was an extremely successful match player. Between 1860 and 1897, he played 36 matches, winning every serious match with the exception of his two matches against Lasker. Some of the prominent players of the day that he defeated in match play other than in his world championship matches included Max Lange, Serafino Dubois, Frederick Deacon, Dionisio Martinez, Joseph Blackburne, Anderssen, Augustus Mongredien, Henry Bird, Johannes Zukertort, George Mackenzie, and Celso Golmayo Zupide.

Tournaments

Steinitz was more adept at winning matches than tournaments in his early years, a factor, which alongside his prolonged absences from competition chess after 1873, may have prevented more widespread recognition of his dominance of chess as world champion until the first "official" world championship match in 1886. Nevertheless, between 1859 and his death in 1900, the only tournament in which he did not win prize money was his final tournament in London in 1899. His wins include the Vienna Championship of 1861 which he won with 30/31 and earned him the nickname the "Austrian Morphy", the London Championship of 1862, Dublin 1865 (equal first with George MacDonnell), London 1872, equal first at Vienna 1873 and 1882 (the latter was the strongest tournament to that time, and Steinitz had just returned from 9 years of absence from tournament chess), and first in the New York Championship of 1894. Other successes include 3rd and 2nd at the Vienna Championships of 1859 and 1860 respectively, 2nd at Dundee in 1867, 3rd in Paris in 1867, 2nd in Baden Baden in 1870, 2nd in London in 1883, 5th at the Hastings super tournament in 1895, 2nd at the sextuple round robin St Petersburg quadrangular tournament behind Lasker and ahead of Harry Pillsbury and Mikhail Chigorin, 6th at Nuremburg in 1896, and 4th at Vienna in 1898.

Steinitz's Legacy

The extent of Steinitz's dominance in world chess is evident from the fact that from 1866, when he beat Adolf Anderssen, to 1894, when he relinquished the world crown to Emanuel Lasker, Steinitz won all his matches, sometimes by wide margins. His worst tournament performance in that period was third place in Paris in 1867. This period of Steinitz's career was closely examined by Chessmetrics exponent and advocate, Jeff Sonas, who wrote an article in 2005 in which he found that Steinitz was further ahead of his contemporaries in the 1870s than Bobby Fischer was in his peak period (1970–1972), that he had the third-highest total number of years as the world's top player, behind Emanuel Lasker and Garry Kasparov, and that he placed 7th in a comparison the length of time great players were ranked in the world's top three.

Despite his pre-eminence in chess for those decades in the late 19th century, Steinitz's main contribution to chess was as its first true theoretician. He rose to prominence in the 1860s on the back of highly competent handling of the romantic attacking style of chess that had been popularised by Morphy and Anderssen and which characterised the style of the era. However, in the Vienna tournament of 1873, he introduced a new positional style of play which not only commenced his run of 25 consecutive high level victories, but profoundly transformed the way chess was played from shortly after that time, when its efficacy was embraced by the chess world. It enabled him to establish his complete dominance over his long time rival, Johannes Zukertort, and to easily win the first official match for the World Championship.

Lasker summarised Steinitz's ideas as follows:

"In the beginning of the game ignore the search for combinations, abstain from violent moves, aim for small advantages, accumulate them, and only after having attained these ends search for the combination – and then with all the power of will and intellect, because then the combination must exist, however deeply hidden."

Although these ideas were controversial and fiercely debated for some years in what has become known as the <Ink Wars>, Lasker and the next generation of the world's best players acknowledged their debt to him.

"He was a thinker worthy of a seat in the halls of a University. A player, as the world believed he was, he was not; his studious temperament made that impossible; and thus he was conquered by a player ..." - <Emanuel Lasker>.

"He understood more about the use of squares than did Morphy, and contributed a great deal more to chess theory.' - <Bobby Fischer>.

Sources
<jessicafischerqueen>'s YouTube documentary http://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis... - in turn sourced mainly from <Kurt Landsberger's> biography "Bohemian Caesar."

References
Wikipedia article: Wilhelm Steinitz
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial...

Last updated: 2025-09-08 13:34:19

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,086  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. K Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-1231859ViennaC29 Vienna Gambit
2. Steinitz vs Lenhof 1-0321859Casual gameC52 Evans Gambit
3. Lenhof vs Steinitz 0-1451859Casual gameC23 Bishop's Opening
4. Steinitz vs P Meitner 1-0341859Casual gameC52 Evans Gambit
5. E Pilhal vs Steinitz 0-1211859Casual gameC53 Giuoco Piano
6. K Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-1281859Casual gameC38 King's Gambit Accepted
7. Steinitz vs F Nowotny 1-0311859Vienna CC tC55 Two Knights Defense
8. Steinitz vs E Pilhal 1-0171860ViennaC52 Evans Gambit
9. K Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-1311860Casual gameC27 Vienna Game
10. Steinitz vs NN 1-0121860UnknownC25 Vienna
11. Harrwitz vs Steinitz  1-0251860Casual gameD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
12. Steinitz vs Harrwitz  0-1391860Casual gameB44 Sicilian
13. Steinitz vs NN  1-0181860Casual game000 Chess variants
14. NN vs Steinitz 0-1241860Casual gameC59 Two Knights
15. Steinitz vs NN  1-0241860Odds game000 Chess variants
16. Steinitz vs NN  1-0151860Casual gameC41 Philidor Defense
17. Steinitz vs NN 1-0161860Casual gameC50 Giuoco Piano
18. Steinitz vs NN  1-0201860Casual gameC52 Evans Gambit
19. Steinitz vs NN  1-0201860Odds game000 Chess variants
20. Steinitz vs H Strauss 1-0331860Casual gameC29 Vienna Gambit
21. H Strauss vs Steinitz 0-1311860Casual gameC51 Evans Gambit
22. Steinitz vs P Meitner 1-0261860Casual gameC55 Two Knights Defense
23. Steinitz vs Lang 1-0191860Casual gameC37 King's Gambit Accepted
24. Steinitz vs Reiner 1-0321860Casual gameC51 Evans Gambit
25. Steinitz vs Lang 1-0291860Casual gameC25 Vienna
 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,086  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Steinitz wins | Steinitz loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 48 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-13-05  Minor Piece Activity: PP, it's a tale of Jekyll and Hide. ;)
Mar-13-05  RookFile: Actually, PP, I'm Minor Piece Activity
as well! I'm a schizo!
Mar-13-05  Minor Piece Activity: Lol, funny, but you have to admit that was a pretty lame attempt. Maybe you should have registered "Barney" and waited a few days first. ;)
Mar-13-05  Gregor Samsa Mendel: Whatever happened to JohnnyRambo, anyway?
Mar-13-05  Minor Piece Activity: File him away in your has been's Gregor, he was open to change. ;)
Mar-13-05  PinkPanther: <Rookfile>
I'm not saying all the players who played the Evans against Steinitz were strong, but a larger percentage of them were than Morphy had to deal with.
Mar-13-05  RookFile: By those strong opponents, do you
mean the following 2 cream puffs,
with whom Steinitz has to grimly
hang on to get a draw?

J Minckwitz vs Steinitz, 1870

G Neumann vs Steinitz, 1867

Mar-13-05  PinkPanther: I hate to say this, but I've never even heard of any of the players who played the Evans against Morphy.
Mar-13-05  PinkPanther: Whereas Steinitz had black against players such as Anderssen, Blackburne and Chigorin.
Mar-13-05  RookFile: Could it be that a lot of players
avoided playing the Evans against
Morphy for the same reason that
they avoided playing the Poisoned
Pawn Najdorf sicilian against Fischer?
Mar-13-05  PinkPanther: Why would they not play the Evans but play the Kings Gambit instead? The tactical complications are most likely even greater in the King's Gambit so your logic (if that's what you want to call it) doesn't even make sense.
Mar-13-05  RookFile: Well, I'll tell you what. Your
question led to a really interesting
discovery. This player, F. Deacon,
appears to have been a really strong
player. Here, he rolls up Morphy
on the White side of a Kings Gambit.

So, we have a player that nobody
has ever heard of, who beat both
Morphy and Steinitz! And I checked,
he played Anderssen and lost in
a real fighting game, going down
swinging, because Anderssen got their
first. Too bad, he would have
gotten the hat trick!

Who WAS this guy F. Deacon?

F Deacon vs Morphy, 1858

Mar-13-05  RookFile: Just for no particular reason,
here's Morphy's other game against
him, this time as White, where Deacon
dares to take on the world's greatest
expert in the Evans gambit, and
acquits himself honorably, before
succumbing:

Morphy vs F Deacon, 1859

Mar-13-05  RookFile: Unbelievable! This guy beat Blackburne, otherwise known as "Black death", with the black pieces!
I bet you could stump a lot of people
with the trivia question: "Name somebody who beat Morphy, Steinitz and Blackburne!"

Blackburne vs F Deacon, 1862

I wonder what happenned to him. The information I have indicates he stopped playing after 1863, then reemerged in 1913... some 50 years later.... and played a game as late as 1925....

Mar-13-05  SBC: Frederic Deacon's games vs. Morphy (and some vs. Steinitz) were bogus. Lawson was very adament about that. You can read something about it here: http://batgirl.atspace.com/morphybi...

Or, since they contnue to be a source of debate, you can read some debate here: F Deacon vs Morphy, 1858

Mar-13-05  RookFile: Wow, this is really interesting....
thanks sbc!
Mar-13-05  SBC: Concerning Deacon vs. the "Black Death" in 1862 (actually, Blackburn wasn't the "Black Death" quite yet), one must be aware that Blackburne only took up chess in July, 1861!

see: http://snow.prohosting.com/~batgrrl...

Mar-13-05  SBC: Nick Pope of Chess Archeology presents an article from the Spirit of the Times, June 30, 1860 edition that gives a sort of jingoistic slant to the Deacon/Morphy contoversy: http://www.chessarch.com/excavation...
Mar-13-05  RookFile: Well, I think we know what happenned
now! LOL! The guy was a cheater,
and knew that if he kept playing,
the guy who beat both Morphy and
Steinitz would get rolled up by
lesser masters, and they'd say: "How
could this be?"
Mar-13-05  SBC: Actually Deacon was a strong player, originally from Belgium but living in London. He was probably equal to Owen in strength. However, I think he might have had some need to be recognized as greater than he was capable of becoming (there doesn't seem to have been any financial gain in his hoaxes). Many historians, even into the middle 20th century gave some credence to Deacon's claims (usually based on earlier historians, and sometimes prejudiced ones at that). But I don't know of any who do anymore.
Mar-25-05  Daysleeper: hey everybody, did any of you know that Steinitz was a professional tapdancer? I read about it in a book for a project I did on him, and I also saw it on wikipedia. I can't find much information about his career in tapdancing. Anyone want to share what they know?
Mar-25-05  vonKrolock: <Dayleeper>: All I know about is that <Outside of his chess career, Steinitz was a regular tap-dancer. In a letter to his friend shortly before his death, Steinitz expressed regret at having never attempted a contest against the world champion of tap-dancing, who at that time was the Spanish-born American Eduardo Corrochio. His love of dancing is indicative of his general character. a man of passion and a lover of art, who had a burning desire to compete and win> (on-line in more tahn one source) Possibly researches in off-line material can afford more details
Mar-27-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopBerkeley: Dr. Emanuel Lasker mentions Mr. Steinitz's friendship with a certain William Norwood Potter in his "Manual of Chess". Dr. Lasker says that Potter "loved unusual and strange moves, [and] had influenced Steinitz greatly" [according to the account Dr. Lasker had heard].

I have posted this passage over on the William Norwood Potter message board.

(: ♗B :)

Mar-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopBerkeley: <Daysleeper> I also read the wikipedia piece about Mr. Steinitz and his noteworthy tap-dancing skills:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhel...

I only wish he had given Chess simuls in which would tap-dance between the various boards! Now there would have been something worth seeing!

Nice images said to be from the 1894 World Championship Match between Steinitz and Dr. Emanuel Lasker

http://www.chessarch.com/museum/pho...

An interesting 1866 picture of Steinitz opposite a photo of Adolf Anderssen will be seen at this site, along with many other good match photos of players you may know:

http://www.endgame.nl/match.htm

Hey, why don't I get to play Chess at the Casino de la Playa?!

All rather fun...

(: ♗B :)

Mar-30-05  RookFile: We have already examined evidence that
Morphy was the far superior player to Steinitz based on the following: 1) Their record against their common opponent: Morphy 12,
Anderssen 3, while Steinitz
LOST 15 to 14.

2) The fact that Chigorin
routinely crushed Steinitz with
the Evans gambit means that
Morphy would have done the
same.

How about the ULTIMATE example? It
would be this:

Steinitz vs Maurian, 1883

This same Maurian was the one who
Morphy used to give knight odds to!

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 48)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 10 OF 48 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC