< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·
|Jul-06-12|| ||LoveThatJoker: WC Anderssen, today you are remembered!
|Oct-23-12|| ||chesssalamander: LTJ, I think A. ought to be considered the first WC, from 1851-1858. He was WC in every sense that really matters. Then, Morphy, then A. again, then Steinitz.|
|Dec-30-12|| ||PhilFeeley: This is an interesting game:
I wonder why it's not here.
|Dec-30-12|| ||thomastonk: <PhilFeeley> I think the final sentence explains why: "Reinfeld stated in The Joys of Chess that the game was an Evans Gambit, but we have yet to trace the full score."|
|Jun-08-13|| ||Poisonpawns: What I found most intriguing about his games(I have deeply studied 60) is the amount of totally lost positions he was in.Due to his extremely active style of play; he was always dangerous even in "busted" positions. He would be losing and his opponent would make a one move error, and the tides would be turned completely. There are a few Falkbeer games that come to mind;Harritz, and also Von der Lasa, where Anderrsen was good as lost but won. It is because of Anderssen, that I never lose with my pieces undeveloped. I always have them active! win or lose.|
|Jul-06-13|| ||Nightsurfer: Today - on the occasion of <Adolf Anderssen>'s 195th birthday on July 6th, 2013 - it is a great gesture by you people of <ChessGames.com> that you haven chosen the game B Hund vs C Hartog, 1978 to be THE GAME OF THE DAY since that very game B Hund vs C Hartog, 1978 climaxes in the sacrifice of two rooks that seems to be inspired by <Adolf Anderssen>'s greatest victory, that epic battle Anderssen vs Kieseritzky, 1851 !|
|Jul-06-13|| ||redlance: Happy Birthday!!!|
|Jul-06-13|| ||playground player: Modern chess players congratulate themselves while standing on the shoulders of giants like Anderssen.|
Oh, I don't mean all modern players. I expect the top masters know and appreciate what they owe to their illustrious predecessors. It's the moderns who aren't masters, and never will be, who show the least respect to the past.
|Jul-06-13|| ||ketchuplover: HBD Herr Anderssen|
|Jul-06-13|| ||nok: Happy birthday to this badass player.|
|Jul-07-13|| ||TheFocus: I thought he was born in Breslau, not Badass.|
|Sep-08-13|| ||Penguincw: Quote of the Day
< "I was wrong in supposing that I could bottle up my chess and put it in a glass case." >
-Anderssen (after defeated by Morphy)
I assume it's after Anderssen-Morphy (1858) (like the whole thing).
|Sep-10-13|| ||DoctorD: Anderssen as problem composer:
|Sep-21-13|| ||TwoKnights: |
Every time I pick up Sid Picard's book on Anderssen it's like electric magic like Tal's winning combinations.
The memorial essay at the beginning is a very moving salute to this great master.
|Sep-22-13|| ||DoctorD: I'd love to get the book, but Picard's tome on Sam Loyd was incredibly disappointing.|
|Nov-04-13|| ||offramp: He had a fantastic brain for spotting mates in seven or less.|
|Nov-04-13|| ||keypusher: <offramp: He had a fantastic brain for spotting mates in seven or less.>|
Good to know that just six moves separate us.
|Feb-24-14|| ||Conrad93: The first world Champion.
The only difference is that he didn't claim it.
|May-21-14|| ||kereru: Anderssen could be scathing. Asked what Morphy thought of his play, he replied:|
"It was impossible for Morphy to express an opinion on this subject, as I did not go to Paris to get a certificate of ability. Those who surrounded the American, however, seemed to think that they flattered me most when they said, how high an opinion he had of my play, and that he considered me the strongest of all opponents he had met till now. But to be reckoned stronger than a Lowenthal, I consider next door to nothing."
|Jul-06-14|| ||Penguincw: R.I.P. Adolf Anderssen. A while ago, I made a bio of him: Game Collection: Bio: Adolf Anderssen.|
|Oct-11-14|| ||Big Pawn: A question for chess historians and Anderssen fans: Do you think Anderssen's style changed after Morphy entered the scene in the late 1850's? Morphy was influential and changed the way the game was played but did Anderssen also change his style a bit?|
|Dec-06-14|| ||offramp: He is often, understandably, forgotten when people talk about the best players of all time. Perhaps there is a bit of reverse snobbery; "He played the Immortal and Evergreen games but these are all old hat!"|
But he was the best player in the world from 1850 to 1870, apart from Morphy's little blip.
And he played hundreds of great games!
Unfortunately, I can't think of any at the moment.
|Jan-23-15|| ||mcgee: >>A question for chess historians and Anderssen fans: Do you think Anderssen's style changed after Morphy entered the scene in the late 1850's? Morphy was influential and changed the way the game was played but did Anderssen also change his style a bit?<<
The general consensus is that he did change his style and start to study the game more seriously. Given that he had few if any bad results in his career other than the Morphy thrashing, it's easy to understand why people feel he might have given a better account of himself in the 1858 match had he studied properly and had plenty of match and tournament practice. The six-year hiatus was an impossible hurdle for him to overcome and he admitted as much.|
Here's an Anderssen game against Steinitz from his tournament win at Baden-Baden in 1870 that I like a lot. It shows how finely his style had evolved - the tactics serve a purpose beyond the idea of a quick checkmate and are combined with excellent positional judgement.
Anderssen vs Steinitz, 1870
|Jan-23-15|| ||mcgee: And another excellent game against Steinitz from their 1866 match. Again, Anderssen had played little or no serious chess after winning at London in 1862 which gives grounds to believe that Steinitz's narrow win (8-6, no draws) may have been reversed in different circumstances. |
Steinitz vs Anderssen, 1866
|Jan-23-15|| ||mcgee: I mean an excellent positional game|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·