< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 4 OF 254 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Nov-28-03 | | technical draw: <about to be slaughtered by a 16 year old>. Are we already writing Karpov off? Is he history? A has been? A shadow of his former self? I could go on but I think the answer is no. He just needs to try my new product, ChessViagra, guaranteed to lift the the most declining ELO, and add new life to a limp career. ChessViagra, buy it where Chess products are sold. Note: You must be at least 21. |
|
Nov-28-03 | | Spitecheck: We might get a clue if we see him smattering the market place with a whole bunch of new books. Surprising that he hasn't already jumped on the Kasparov trail and released like a thousand different titles. Spitecheck |
|
Nov-28-03 | | MoonlitKnight: technical draw: LOL! That must be the only thing that can bring Karpov back in shape. |
|
Dec-05-03 | | Spitecheck: LOL I have to ask, I see the featured product advertised on the front page. Disney's Chess Guide by Anatoly Karpov. For starters he doesn't speak the best english, and he doesn't seem like the parental type. Why would they choose him for the project? I can imagine him explaining to the young folk the ramifications of 32...b4 in the Spanish but I can't quite see him talking about how the bishops move. Spitecheck |
|
Jan-05-04 | | tomh72000: Observe the following link:
http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet... |
|
Jan-20-04 | | square dance: who put up that website, fischer or kasparov? |
|
Jan-20-04 | | OneBadDog: AK is in his Fat Elvis stage. |
|
Jan-20-04 | | Benjamin Lau: sd, how about Korchnoi? ;-) The bitterness between them goes far... |
|
Jan-20-04 | | OneBadDog: Korchnoi's no saint, but he was treated horribly by AK & his cronies in '78. |
|
Jan-20-04 | | technical draw: Great link tomh72000. Who said chess was a serious affair? |
|
Jan-20-04 | | OneBadDog: For most of us mortals, Chess is a very comic affair. |
|
Jan-20-04 | | square dance: <bl> as we all know korchnoi doesnt count.=p |
|
Jan-21-04 | | Slothrop: BadDog, why do you say that Korchnoi is no saint? I've always understood that he's a great guy; I'm a big fan. |
|
Jan-21-04 | | OneBadDog: Slothrop. Korchnoi has a reputation of being blunt and abrasive. Korchnoi has had his share of enemies: Karpov, Petrosian, Polugaevsky. Regardless, Korchnoi is one of my favoritr players. |
|
Jan-21-04 | | Larsker: <Korchnoi has a reputation of being blunt and abrasive. Korchnoi has had his share of enemies> Korchnoi has a habit of harassing his opponents. He likes to stand behind his opponent and follow the game from there. Not exactly the most ethical behavior. |
|
Jan-21-04 | | Bluebird: Alekhine used to do the same thing. I don't think in AA's case it was meant to upset the opponent but rather to see if he could see anything from the opposite side. |
|
Feb-11-04 | | Stavrogin: If Fischer would have shown for a 1975 match with Karpov - what would the numbers have looked like? Kasparov has recently said that Karpov would have given Fischer a hard time (not the exact word, but the meaning). Do you agree or disagree (motivate please - i find this question very interesting). |
|
Feb-11-04 | | Whitehat1963: <Larsker>, <Bluebird>, I'm not sure if Botvinnik was the perpetrator or the victim, (I think he was the victim, and I think Alekhine was the perpetrator) in a match in which one of the players walked in gradually shrinking circles around the table whenever his opponent was deciding on his next move. Aren't there rules about disruptive behavior? |
|
Feb-11-04 | | square dance: <stavrogin> i favor fischer in 75, but i am not convinced he would have won. some logic tells me that fischer was would have been better in 75 but in 78 karpov would have won. this is just pure speculation though. it does not take into account the fact that fischer often devistated his opponents and ruined them psychologically during matches. if this had happened during the hypothetical 75 match then fischer would've repeated in 78 if karpov even made it there. if, on the other hand, the 75 match had been close with a fischer win i would think that karpov would win in 78. |
|
Feb-11-04 | | Stavrogin: it is one of those great imagined games, along with Morphy vs Zukertort and Fischer - Kasparov. I am not convinced either.
But I could share your belief that in 75 it would be F, in 78 ( a few years more developing for K) it would be K).
And - even more hypothetical - if F would have stayed around 'til 82-85, then Kasparov would have taken his place just as he took Karpov's. |
|
Feb-11-04 | | square dance: <stavrogin> yes by the time of kasparov's first title match fischer would have been 43. if he was still champion then, i think the young lion kasparov may have been too much for him. |
|
Feb-11-04 | | Orcinus: <Stavroquin> Well, I'm sure Fisher would of given Karpov a hard time too. Karpov was almost an exclusive e4 player at the time. I do believe Karpov would of had a tough time against the sicilian as he did with Kasparov. I've read it's possible Karpov became a d4 player because of it. Look at the first game in the match against Spassky. Spassky won in flying colors with the sicilian. He did loose playing the sicilian a second time taking a dubious line. Karpov was not comfortable at complicated double edge middle games. Players like Miles knew this and could take advantage of it. One strike against Fisher is he hadn't been competeing in 3 years. For me the biggest strike against Karpov is his openings was limited at the time. Karpov admits being laid back on this point. It's not like Fisher who studied all the openings but was restricted and selective by choice and continually expanding. Some will say Karpov defensive skills would work against Fisher. A little, keep in mind Fisher rarely made an unsound attack. Both had a Capablanca-like ability to grasp the essentails of a position. So, I'd have to favor Fisher especailly in a longer match. That's my opinion for what it's worth. |
|
Feb-11-04 | | Whitehat1963: Was Korchnoi a much better player in the late 70s than he was in the early 60s when he played Fischer? I'm certain Fischer would have been able to beat Karpov handily in 75, and the intimidating Fischer psychology would have been too much for Karpov in a rematch. Chess players rarely play rematches better (Botvinnik being a notable exception). |
|
Feb-11-04 | | ughaibu: Alekhine, Smyslov, Spassky, Kasparov all won the world championship by re-matches, Korchnoi-Petrosian at candidates level...... |
|
Feb-11-04 | | square dance: <whitehat1963> what makes you so certain that fischer would've won so easily in 75? is it the fact that he had not played in three years? is it the fact that he had not studied karpov's games to the extent that he had the players of his generation? from what i remember karpov beat spassky by about the same score as fischer, and supposedly spassky was in better form for that match. with all these questions how can one be sure of the result either way? |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 4 OF 254 ·
Later Kibitzing> |