chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz
Steinitz 
 

Number of games in database: 1,085
Years covered: 1859 to 1899
Overall record: +472 -192 =152 (67.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 269 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Vienna Opening (111) 
    C25 C29 C28 C27 C26
 French Defense (86) 
    C00 C11 C01 C10 C02
 King's Gambit Accepted (71) 
    C39 C37 C38 C35 C34
 French (51) 
    C00 C11 C10 C13 C12
 King's Gambit Declined (42) 
    C30 C31 C32
 Evans Gambit (30) 
    C51 C52
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (132) 
    C62 C70 C60 C64 C65
 Evans Gambit (74) 
    C52 C51
 Giuoco Piano (37) 
    C50 C53 C54
 King's Gambit Accepted (28) 
    C33 C39 C37 C38 C34
 Scotch Game (22) 
    C45
 Three Knights (16) 
    C46
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Steinitz vs von Bardeleben, 1895 1-0
   Steinitz vs Chigorin, 1892 1-0
   Steinitz vs A Mongredien, 1862 1-0
   S Dubois vs Steinitz, 1862 0-1
   S Rosenthal vs Steinitz, 1873 0-1
   Steinitz vs A Mongredien, 1862 1-0
   Zukertort vs Steinitz, 1886 0-1
   Steinitz vs Paulsen, 1870 1-0
   Steinitz vs A Sellman, 1885 1-0
   Steinitz vs Lasker, 1896 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Steinitz - Zukertort World Championship Match (1886)
   Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Match (1889)
   Steinitz - Gunsberg World Championship Match (1890)
   Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Rematch (1892)
   Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894)
   Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Bird - Steinitz (1866)
   Anderssen - Steinitz (1866)
   Vienna (1873)
   Steinitz - Blackburne (1876)
   Steinitz - Martinez (1882)
   Vienna (1882)
   2nd City Chess Club Tournament (1894)
   Baden-Baden (1870)
   London (1883)
   St. Petersburg Quadrangular 1895/96 (1895)
   Paris (1867)
   Vienna (1898)
   Hastings (1895)
   Nuremberg (1896)
   London (1899)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   The t_t Players: Staunton, Steinitz & Zukertort by fredthebear
   Match Steinitz! by amadeus
   Match Steinitz! by docjan
   The Dark Side by lonchaney
   Stupendous Play from Steinitz' Day Lee by fredthebear
   World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
   World Champion - Steinitz (I.Linder/V.Linder) by nbabcox
   Stupendous Play from Steinitz' Day by Okavango
   World championship games A-Z by kevin86
   The t_t Players: The 1900s rok by fredthebear
   1883 Beyond London lks SP by fredthebear
   the rivals 1 by ughaibu
   y1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by plerranov
   y1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by fredthebear

GAMES ANNOTATED BY STEINITZ: [what is this?]
   Showalter vs Gossip, 1889
   J McConnell vs Steinitz, 1886
   Chigorin vs Gunsberg, 1889
   M Weiss vs N MacLeod, 1889
   Showalter vs Taubenhaus, 1889
   >> 130 GAMES ANNOTATED BY STEINITZ


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Wilhelm Steinitz
Search Google for Wilhelm Steinitz

WILHELM STEINITZ
(born May-14-1836, died Aug-12-1900, 64 years old) Austria (federation/nationality United States of America)
PRONUNCIATION:
[what is this?]

William (né Wolfgang, aka Wilhelm) Steinitz, born Prague BOH (Austrian Empire); died New York, NY USA.

Wilhelm Steinitz is the earliest World Champion of chess recognized by FIDE.

Background

The last of thirteen sons of a hardware retailer, he was born in Prague in what was then the Kingdom of Bohemia within the Austrian Empire and which is now within the Czech republic. Like his father he was a Talmudic scholar, but then he left to study mathematics in the Vienna Polytechnic. He eventually dropped out of the Polytechnic to play chess professionally. Soon after, he played in the London tournament of 1862, and then settled in London for over twenty years, making his living at the London Chess Club. He emigrated to the USA in 1883, taking out US citizenship, living in New York for the rest of his life, and changing his first name to "William".

Matches

He was recognized as the world's leading player, and considered to be the world champion by many, after he defeated the then-acknowledged number one chess player in the world (now that Paul Morphy had retired), Adolf Anderssen, in a match in 1866 which he won by 8-6. However, it was not until his victory in the Steinitz - Zukertort World Championship Match (1886) – where he sat beside a US flag - that he was recognised as the first undisputed world chess champion. He successfully defended his title three times in the Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Match (1889), the Steinitz - Gunsberg World Championship Match (1890), and in the Steinitz - Chigorin World Championship Rematch (1892). In 1894, Emanuel Lasker won the crown from Steinitz by winning the Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894) and retained it by winning the Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896).

Steinitz was an extremely successful match player. Between 1860 and 1897, he played 36 matches, winning every serious match with the exception of his two matches against Lasker. Some of the prominent players of the day that he defeated in match play other than in his world championship matches included Max Lange, Serafino Dubois, Frederick Deacon, Dionisio Martinez, Joseph Blackburne, Anderssen, Augustus Mongredien, Henry Bird, Johannes Zukertort, George Mackenzie, and Celso Golmayo Zupide.

Tournaments

Steinitz was more adept at winning matches than tournaments in his early years, a factor, which alongside his prolonged absences from competition chess after 1873, may have prevented more widespread recognition of his dominance of chess as world champion until the first "official" world championship match in 1886. Nevertheless, between 1859 and his death in 1900, the only tournament in which he did not win prize money was his final tournament in London in 1899. His wins include the Vienna Championship of 1861 which he won with 30/31 and earned him the nickname the "Austrian Morphy", the London Championship of 1862, Dublin 1865 (equal first with George MacDonnell), London 1872, equal first at Vienna 1873 and 1882 (the latter was the strongest tournament to that time, and Steinitz had just returned from 9 years of absence from tournament chess), and first in the New York Championship of 1894. Other successes include 3rd and 2nd at the Vienna Championships of 1859 and 1860 respectively, 2nd at Dundee in 1867, 3rd in Paris in 1867, 2nd in Baden Baden in 1870, 2nd in London in 1883, 5th at the Hastings super tournament in 1895, 2nd at the sextuple round robin St Petersburg quadrangular tournament behind Lasker and ahead of Harry Pillsbury and Mikhail Chigorin, 6th at Nuremburg in 1896, and 4th at Vienna in 1898.

Steinitz's Legacy

The extent of Steinitz's dominance in world chess is evident from the fact that from 1866, when he beat Adolf Anderssen, to 1894, when he relinquished the world crown to Emanuel Lasker, Steinitz won all his matches, sometimes by wide margins. His worst tournament performance in that period was third place in Paris in 1867. This period of Steinitz's career was closely examined by Chessmetrics exponent and advocate, Jeff Sonas, who wrote an article in 2005 in which he found that Steinitz was further ahead of his contemporaries in the 1870s than Robert James Fischer was in his peak period (1970–1972), that he had the third-highest total number of years as the world's top player, behind Emanuel Lasker and Garry Kasparov, and that he placed 7th in a comparison the length of time great players were ranked in the world's top three.

Despite his pre-eminence in chess for those decades in the late 19th century, Steinitz's main contribution to chess was as its first true theoretician. He rose to prominence in the 1860s on the back of highly competent handling of the romantic attacking style of chess that had been popularised by Morphy and Anderssen and which characterised the style of the era. However, in the Vienna tournament of 1873, he introduced a new positional style of play which not only commenced his run of 25 consecutive high level victories, but profoundly transformed the way chess was played from shortly after that time, when its efficacy was embraced by the chess world. It enabled him to establish his complete dominance over his long time rival, Johannes Zukertort, and to easily win the first official match for the World Championship.

Lasker summarised Steinitz's ideas as follows:

"In the beginning of the game ignore the search for combinations, abstain from violent moves, aim for small advantages, accumulate them, and only after having attained these ends search for the combination – and then with all the power of will and intellect, because then the combination must exist, however deeply hidden."

Although these ideas were controversial and fiercely debated for some years in what has become known as the <Ink Wars>, Lasker and the next generation of the world's best players acknowledged their debt to him.

"He was a thinker worthy of a seat in the halls of a University. A player, as the world believed he was, he was not; his studious temperament made that impossible; and thus he was conquered by a player ..." - <Emanuel Lasker>.

"He understood more about the use of squares than did Morphy, and contributed a great deal more to chess theory.' - <Bobby Fischer>.

Sources
<jessicafischerqueen>'s YouTube documentary http://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis... - in turn sourced mainly from <Kurt Landsberger's> biography "Bohemian Caesar."

References
Wikipedia article: Wilhelm Steinitz
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial...

Last updated: 2025-04-13 18:53:01

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,085  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. K Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-1231859ViennaC29 Vienna Gambit
2. Lenhof vs Steinitz 0-1451859Casual gameC23 Bishop's Opening
3. Steinitz vs Lenhof 1-0321859Casual gameC52 Evans Gambit
4. Steinitz vs P Meitner 1-0341859Casual gameC52 Evans Gambit
5. E Pilhal vs Steinitz 0-1211859Casual gameC53 Giuoco Piano
6. K Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-1281859Casual gameC38 King's Gambit Accepted
7. Steinitz vs F Nowotny 1-0311859Vienna CC tC55 Two Knights Defense
8. Steinitz vs NN 1-0121860UnknownC25 Vienna
9. Steinitz vs Harrwitz  0-1391860Casual gameB44 Sicilian
10. Steinitz vs NN  1-0201860Odds game000 Chess variants
11. Steinitz vs NN  1-0151860Casual gameC41 Philidor Defense
12. Steinitz vs NN 1-0161860Casual gameC50 Giuoco Piano
13. Steinitz vs NN  1-0181860Casual game000 Chess variants
14. NN vs Steinitz 0-1241860Casual gameC59 Two Knights
15. Harrwitz vs Steinitz  1-0251860Casual gameD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
16. K Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-1311860Casual gameC27 Vienna Game
17. Steinitz vs NN  1-0201860Casual gameC52 Evans Gambit
18. Steinitz vs E Pilhal 1-0171860ViennaC52 Evans Gambit
19. Steinitz vs NN  1-0241860Odds game000 Chess variants
20. H Strauss vs Steinitz 0-1311860Casual gameC51 Evans Gambit
21. Steinitz vs H Strauss 1-0331860Casual gameC29 Vienna Gambit
22. Steinitz vs P Meitner 1-0261860Casual gameC55 Two Knights Defense
23. Steinitz vs Lang 1-0191860Casual gameC37 King's Gambit Accepted
24. Steinitz vs Reiner 1-0321860Casual gameC51 Evans Gambit
25. Steinitz vs Lang 1-0291860Casual gameC25 Vienna
 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,085  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Steinitz wins | Steinitz loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 23 OF 48 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-22-06  whatthefat: I'd suggest the Corzo match as the first "serious game". I'm not sure about all of the other players though. It would be nice to see a rigorous version of the table - perhaps also with a "first learnt to play" column, although that would be harder still to obtain.
Sep-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopBerkeley: Quite a number of Wilhelm Steinitz's letters can be read online here:

http://books.google.com/books?vid=I...

Simply use the blue arrows in the upper right corner to browse this book page by page.

Cheers!

(: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :)

Oct-29-06  Nikita Smirnov: Why is Steinitz so popular.For his playing style or?
Oct-29-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <Why is Steinitz so popular.For his playing style or?> probably because he organized chess thought in a way that probably only Nimzovitch did since ....

his principles hold good even today....

Nov-05-06  lblai: "He was the first to claim the title of world champion officially; he was the first who evolved any kind of theory which made sense. He elaborated the principles of position play which have since become the ABC of all chess knowledge. He was the first completely professional chess master who devoted his entire life to the game. And he was the first who showed that writing about chess can produce good literature." - Reuben Fine (1951)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhel...

Nov-22-06  Stellar King: <<<<<<<<how come paul morphy was never >>>world champion>>>!!!!!!>>
Nov-22-06  who: Because the title didn't exist while he was alive.
Nov-22-06  RookFile: Actually, it did. "Returning to England in the spring of 1859, Morphy was lionized by the English. In London, at a gathering in his honor, he was again proclaimed "The Champion of the World". -- Lawson
Nov-22-06  RookFile: And the number of years for Kasparov is too low in offramps's very interesting chart. Kasparov was already in the Botvinnik school of chess and playing in tournaments when he was 8 years old.

You don't get into the Botvinnik school unless you're already a terrific player.

Nov-24-06  lblai: During the time of Morphy, phrases such as "world champion" were just another way of referring to the popular opinion about the identity of the best chess player in the world. It was during the time of the dominance of Steinitz that there was a match with an IN ADVANCE agreement that the winner would be the world champion.
Nov-29-06  Maatalkko: It's patently obvious that Morphy would have become World Champion if the title had existed. The same can be said of Philidor and perhaps Labourdonnais. I think that the Labordonnais - MacDonnel match was the first real master match, but I think it would be misleading to classify players before Steinitz as "World Champions". Those players simply didn't have much quality opposition.
Nov-29-06  percyblakeney: <I think it would be misleading to classify players before Steinitz as "World Champions">

Agreed, the World Championship just didn't exist. Giving the title to players afterwards seems strange, a bit like declaring Uruguay as the "most" World Champions in football since they probably would have won the title if it had existed in for example 1916, 1920, 1924 and 1928.

Dec-19-06  Archives: <iron maiden: <I guess you could make an argument for Pillsbury and Rubinstein, but both were really only one-tournament wonders.>

Rubinstein a <one-tournament wonder>? Sorry, but this statement is completely ridiculous. Just have a look at Rubinstein's tournament results (especially in 1912) speak for themselves but Rubinstein won all the matches he ever played (except for the first one against Salwe in 1903 which ended 5-5). His record: 1903 - Salwe: 5-5 (10 games)
Salwe: 5-3 (10 games)
1908 - Teichmann: 3-2 (6 games)
Marshall: 3-2 (8 games)
1909 - Mieses: 5-3 (10 games)
1918 - Schlechter: 2-1 (6 games)
1920 - Bogoljubov: 5-4 (12 games)
He was a strong player throughout his career though he suffered from a mental illness which made him commit grotesque blunders and throw away completely winning games in later years. Still, Capablanca thought highly of him but wait - who's this Capablanca-guy? If iron maiden says that Rubinstein was merely a <one tournament wonder> this counts...>

Yes, who is this Capablanca guy? I've heard his name mentioned many times on this website but still am in the dark about him!?

Dec-19-06  lblai: Perhaps consult:

Jose Raul Capablanca

or

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3...

Dec-19-06  Archives: Thanks! I always thought it was a type of car or something.
Dec-23-06  pazzed paun: <Why is Steinitz so popular?> well ...if that were true why are there so few well annotated games collection of Steinitz available in English?

Steinitz was not "popular" in his time-he was always involved in some argument or lawsuit with somebody-

he maybe thought of as influential though.

How many people using chessgames.com have made a deep study of his games and did it help their playing strength? Let us know and give us a bibliography
please!

Dec-23-06  sixfeetunder: Why isnt the game between Steinitz and God in the database?
Dec-23-06  Cyphelium: <sixfeetunder> Because God defaulted to play.
Dec-24-06  lblai: Chernev wrote, "Steinitz had enough [confidence] to say once that he did not believe even God could give him Pawn and move odds!" Others seem to have garbled the Chernev story. Nobody knows where Chernev got the story. Those interested in the Steinitz-God story might want to consult entries 3731 and 3749 of Chess Notes at http://www.chesshistory.com/
Dec-25-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <pazzed paun> Interesting challenge. In retrospect, I can not say I studied Steinitz in depth. It was more that often when I was tracing this or that strategic idea back in time, I found some classic Steinitz game(s) at the beginning of the path. Thus I certainly woul'd, for instance, credit most of my minor pieces play back to Steinitz, especially the bishop pair -- with or against.

That is just one example of many. But what I realy recall most distinctly in connection with Steinitz is how playing through parts of Pachman's <Modern Chess Strategy> as a kid, I deeply resonated with White's play in Steinitz vs Chigorin, 1892. Right then I knew that this was how I wanted to play chess.

Dec-31-06  Nikita Smirnov: Steinitz is not a Stein but he is a Stein-Blitz!
Jan-20-07  MrPatzer: "I have never in my life played the French Defence, which is the dullest of all openings."--- Steinitz

I would argue with the second part of that statement, and the first part is technically not true:

J McConnell vs Steinitz, 1886

Jan-20-07  Karpova: Steinitz's annotations make clear why he played this one.
Jan-20-07  laskereshevsky: HELLO <MrPatzer>
When I saw the daily qoute,
I made the same research..
"The World its a very little place"...

Just i think the FRENCH is a reasonable
way to fight E4 beetw. a lots of others moves....

GENS UNA SUMUS

Feb-11-07  ksadler: <pazzed paun: How many people using chessgames.com have made a deep study of his games and did it help their playing strength? Let us know and give us a bibliography please!>

I have played through all of his games, and am making a collection of annotated games of his (in Chessbase). So far, I have included Hastings 1895 (a good book for any chess player to analyze with), Kasparov Volume 1 and individual games from other compilation books.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 48)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 23 OF 48 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC