|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 222 OF 222 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
| Apr-06-09 |
| wrap99: SBC, what an interesting post of the names on the Morphy burial site. It looks like at least one person who had probably met Paul, Emma, survived until the late 1940s. Was this a sister or cousin perhaps? |
 |
| Apr-06-09 |
| SBC: . <wrapp99> .
Paul Morphy's brother Edward had a son, Edward Stephen Morphy (born in 1862) as well as the better known daughter, Regina.
Little Edward maried Emma Marie Merlin (who is buried in the tomb). Edward and Emma had two children, Juanita and Paul Henry Morphy. Juanita and Paul Henry Morphy are also buried in the tomb. Paul H. Morphy married Yevkine Arabian Prados and moved to Milan Italy. There they had three children that I know of: Paul Henry Morphy, Jr. Edward Rene Morphy and Emma Morphy Paul Henry and Edward Rene are also buried in the tomb. As an aside, Paul Henry Morphy, Jr. and his wife Edith had three children, Paul Morphy III, Lisa Morphy and Carla Morphy. Our own <BishopBerkeley> has been in personal contact with Carla, I believe, and I've had some contact with Lisa, both women seem quite charming. . |
 |
Apr-08-09
 |
| Calli: Marriage record:
05/30/1885
Morphy Edward Stephen, Jr. 23 M - Emma Marie Merlin 23 It is not certain then that Emma met Edward's weird old uncle Paul. |
 |
| Apr-08-09 |
| SBC: <It is not certain then that Emma met Edward's weird old uncle Paul.> . . .and probably doubtful.
Thanks |
 |
Apr-10-09
 |
| keypusher: <YoungEd: Interesting idea, <talisman>, to apply "peak" and "career" values to chessplayers as James does to ballplayers. Morphy just might have the highest peak value--who would have the greatest career value? Lasker, maybe?> I don't know. Lasker had a very long career, but he didn't play very much. So maybe Kasparov, though his peak value was quite high also. Continuing with peak value, Philidor seemed to be able to give anyone in the chess world odds in the 18th century, although he didn't play the leading Italians. Staunton was very dominant in the 1840s. Who knows how good Greco was? The number of good chessplayers increases as we move forward through history, making it difficult to compare ancient players with modern ones. |
 |
| Apr-19-09 |
| YoungEd: Good point, <keypusher>, that Lasker didn't play that much. So maybe you're right about Kasparov. I suppose a careful look at something like chessmetrics.com would help us construct good arguments. |
 |
| Apr-24-09 |
| SBC: Just for the record...
The aforementioned daguerreotype which is supposedly Morphy is not a recent discovery. I've found a reference to it as far back as 2004 in the "Irish Independent," who picked the article up from Financial Times Ltd. The article is about neither Morphy nor that daguerreotype, but simply uses the image as an example of what some old daguerreotypes can fetch at auction. Here's a portion of the article:
"THE DAGUERREOTYPE was invented in 1838 by Louis Jacques Mande Daguerre and was the first practical photographic process.
Also known as 'The mirror with a memory', the daguerreotype method of photography was by mercury vapour development of silver iodide exposed on a copper plate.
The photographs on metal, mostly quite small, are now very collectable and they appear regularly in Ireland.
After an exhibition by Daguerre in 1839 they became very popular. In 1845 half a million plates were sold in Paris alone. And by 1853 in America over three million daguerreotypes were being exposed annually. More than one thousand New Yorkers worked as photographers and 95 per cent of daguerreotypes were portraits.
The subjects can be fascinating to the viewer and will show how much things have changed - or not - over a century and a half. An 1840s daguerreotype of a blacksmith could have been taken at any time, but another of an 1850s Anglican bishop shows the typical garments with their voluminous white shirt sleeves worn by such churchmen of the time.
In the photography catalogues of auction sales the description of daguerreotypes is often preceded by the title 'Daguerreian unknown'. And just as often the subject of the daguerreotype is also unknown. This can leave interesting opportunities for research.
A quarter-plate by an unknown daguerreian appeared at a recent auction, illustrating a lady handing a younger woman a small case. Titled 'Youth Forewarned' and dated 'May 27, 1853, San Francisco', the beautiful younger woman bears a striking resemblance to the infamous actress and dancer Lola Montez.
Based on research, it is known that Lola Montez played a deaf mute inYelva, orThe Orphan Girl of Russia in San Francisco, a role one could easily believe she is representing in this image.
A contemporary San Francisco reviewer voiced the opinion that, 'The drama ofYelva is made effective and interesting by the graceful and impressive pantomime of the actress, who relates in dumb show a more thrilling scene of suffering than perhaps language could express.'
Lola Montez (1818-1861), or Maria Dolores Eliza Gilbert, was a Scottish-Creole dancer who became the mistress of King Ludwig I of Bavaria. At least three films have been made about her life.
The research into the Lola Montez daguerreotype paid off as it sold for $16,000 against a fairly high estimate of $4,000-6,000.
The instant likeness achieved by the photographic portrait can never be duplicated by a painting or drawing, and the clarity of those mid 19 century daguerreotypes is astonishing.
A half-plate daguerreotype, circa 1857, of Paul Morphy (1837-1884), the chess champion, sold for $5,500 (est. $2,200).
Morphy started his brief but illustrious career as a chess genius in New Orleans when, in 1850, just before his thirteenth birthday, he defeated the Hungarian chess master Jacob Lowenthal. Besides excelling at chess, Paul Morphy graduated at law school with the highest honours ever bestowed on an individual by Spring Hills College in Alabama.
In 1857, he won first prize in the National Chess Congress of America in New York, and in Europe beat the most renowned chess professionals.
Always considering chess as no more than a game, he found it difficult to adapt to the pressures brought by fame. He died in 1884, sad and alone." |
 |
Apr-28-09
 |
| vonKrolock: <"A half-plate daguerreotype, circa 1857, of Paul Morphy (1837-1884)"> The story is being repeated, not investigated... |
 |
Apr-28-09
 |
| Calli: Yes, a 2004 article would not be earlier than the June/July 1984 American Heritage piece, if, indeed, they are the same daguerreotype. |
 |
| Apr-29-09 |
| SBC: ahh.. I hadn't noticed the date of the AH article. 25 yrs ago, huh? 150 years ago tomorrow, April 30, Morphy would be boarding the Persia and bidding England farewell. |
 |
| Apr-30-09 |
| WhiteRook48: Morphy: "Checkers is for tramps." |
 |
May-02-09
 |
| Calli: Guess I am done fiddling with it Game Collection: Morphy's Knight Odds Match vs Thompson Includes a Morphy position not in the DB. Can you find the winning move? |
 |
| May-05-09 |
| WhiteRook48: 1. Re6- wild guess |
 |
May-11-09
 |
| notyetagm: Game Collection: Morphy's ZWISCHENZUGEN T Lichtenhein vs Morphy, 1857
Not 10 ... d5xBe4?! first 10 .. Qd8-h4! threatening mate on f2! J Schulten vs Morphy, 1857
Not 27 ... Rd8xNd5?! first 27 ... e3-e2! *then* 28 ... Rd8xNd5 |
 |
Jun-18-09
 |
| vonKrolock: Still on the 'alphabetical' genre of chess problems, newly online the complete set of six two-movers showing Morphy's surname, composed by Eugene B. Cook and published in the "Dubuque Chess Journal" in January 1876 - thanks to Gary Kevin Ware (here with a solving contest) http://www.chessproblem.net/viewtop... |
 |
| Jun-20-09 |
| WhiteRook48: he's more dedicated to 1. e4 than Fischer |
 |
Jun-22-09
 |
| Joshka: Probably one of the greatest if not the best chess player of all time, and no mention of his birthday here at chessgames.com Darn there is an annual tourney for Capablanca, but none for Morphy, what a shame..... |
 |
| Jun-22-09 |
| WhiteRook48: Happy birthday to #1!! |
 |
Jun-27-09
 |
| Ed Trice: < WhiteRook48: Morphy: "Checkers is for tramps."> Some checkers endgames are much harder to win than chess endgames. In 2004, I proved a position with as few as 7 pieces (4 for the winning side) could not be won by any modern programs using only the so-called "Win Loss Draw" tablebases. The only way to win is if you have Distance To Win tablebases, which, to this day, have only been computed by two people on the planet (myself and Gil Dodgen). Distance To Win is very hard to compute in checkers, because win length frequently does not correspond to the iteration that the win was found. http://www.GothicChess.com/7_piece....
Don't click on this next link unless you have a real fast internet connection: http://www.gothicchess.com/checkers... |
 |
Jun-27-09
 |
| BishopBerkeley: (This is a near-duplicate post to one I made over on the Robert James Fischer message board in response to <Pawn Ambush>. I share it here for obvious reasons...) You might enjoy the excellent page of quotations about Paul Morphy at Wikiquote: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Paul_M...
Everyone from Adolf Anderssen to Emanuel Lasker to Jose Raul Capablanca to Robert James Fischer to Garry Kasparov to Viswanathan Anand (with many others in between) is quoted there! You might also enjoy Batgirl's (Sarah Beth's) blog -- she may be the most knowledgeable person about Paul Morphy alive! http://www.chess.com/members/view/b...
(She's also made many excellent contributions to this site as <SBC>: User: SBC ) (: Bishop Berkeley :) |
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 222 OF 222 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
|
 |
|