chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker
Lasker 
 

Number of games in database: 1,541
Years covered: 1887 to 1940
Overall record: +384 -84 =176 (73.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 897 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (230) 
    C68 C62 C66 C67 C64
 French Defense (115) 
    C11 C12 C13 C01 C10
 French (80) 
    C11 C12 C13 C10 C00
 King's Gambit Accepted (80) 
    C39 C33 C38 C35 C37
 Sicilian (60) 
    B45 B32 B30 B40 B20
 King's Gambit Declined (58) 
    C30 C31 C32
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (129) 
    C65 C67 C66 C68 C77
 Orthodox Defense (51) 
    D50 D63 D52 D60 D53
 Giuoco Piano (42) 
    C50 C53 C54
 Sicilian (32) 
    B32 B45 B73 B83 B30
 Queen's Pawn Game (32) 
    D00 D05 D02 D04 A46
 Queen's Gambit Declined (21) 
    D37 D35 D30 D39 D06
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Lasker vs J Bauer, 1889 1-0
   Lasker vs Capablanca, 1914 1-0
   Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1896 0-1
   Marshall vs Lasker, 1907 0-1
   Lasker vs W E Napier, 1904 1-0
   Euwe vs Lasker, 1934 0-1
   Reti vs Lasker, 1924 0-1
   Lasker vs Schlechter, 1910 1-0
   M Porges vs Lasker, 1896 0-1
   Tarrasch vs Lasker, 1908 0-1

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894)
   Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896)
   Lasker - Marshall World Championship Match (1907)
   Lasker - Tarrasch World Championship Match (1908)
   Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910)
   Lasker - Schlechter World Championship Match (1910)
   Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Impromptu International Congress, New York (1893)
   Lasker - Bird (1890)
   London (1899)
   St. Petersburg Quadrangular 1895/96 (1895)
   Nuremberg (1896)
   Paris (1900)
   Lasker - Janowski (1909)
   St. Petersburg (1914)
   New York (1924)
   Maehrisch-Ostrau (1923)
   St. Petersburg (1909)
   Moscow (1925)
   Hastings (1895)
   Cambridge Springs (1904)
   Zuerich (1934)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   -ER Lasker by fredthebear
   -ER Lasker by rpn4
   Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
   Emanuel Lasker Collection by rpn4
   Match Lasker! by amadeus
   Match Lasker! by docjan
   The Unknown Emanuel Lasker by MissScarlett
   The Lion King by chocobonbon
   Treasure's Ark by Gottschalk
   Why Lasker Matters (Soltis) by PassedPawnDuo
   Why Lasker Matters (Soltis) by Qindarka
   Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by PassedPawnDuo
   Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by StoppedClock
   Why Lasker Matters by Edwin Meijer

GAMES ANNOTATED BY LASKER: [what is this?]
   Rubinstein vs Lasker, 1909
   Rubinstein vs Salwe, 1908
   Spielmann vs Rubinstein, 1909
   Tartakower vs Schlechter, 1909
   Lasker vs Teichmann, 1909
   >> 81 GAMES ANNOTATED BY LASKER


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Emanuel Lasker
Search Google for Emanuel Lasker

EMANUEL LASKER
(born Dec-24-1868, died Jan-11-1941, 72 years old) Germany

[what is this?]

Emanuel Lasker was the second official World Chess Champion, reigning for a record 27 years after he defeated the first World Champion, Wilhelm Steinitz, in 1894.

Statistician Jeff Sonas of Chessmetrics writes, "if you look across players' entire careers, there is a significant amount of statistical evidence to support the claim that Emanuel Lasker was, in fact, the most dominant player of all time." http://en.chessbase.com/post/the-gr... By Sonas' reckoning, Lasker was the No. 1 player in the world for a total of 24.3 years between 1890 and 1926. Only Kasparov (21.9 years) even approaches this.

Background

Lasker was born in what was then Berlinchen (literally "little Berlin") in Prussia, and which is now Barlinek in Poland. In 1880, he went to school in Berlin, where he lived with his older brother Berthold Lasker, who was studying medicine, and who taught him how to play chess. By Chessmetrics' analysis, Berthold was one of the world's top ten players in the early 1890s.

Tournaments

Soon after Lasker obtained his abitur in Landsberg an der Warthe, now a Polish town named Gorzow Wielkopolski, the teenager's first tournament success came when he won the Café Kaiserhof's annual Winter tournament 1888/89, winning all 20 games. Soon afterwards, he tied with Emil von Feyerfeil with 12/15 (+11 -2 =2) at the second division tournament of the sixth DSB Congress in Breslau, defeating von Feyerfeil in the one game play-off.* Also in 1889, he came second with 6/8 (+5 -1 =2) behind Amos Burn at the Amsterdam "A" (stronger) tournament, ahead of James Mason and Isidor Gunsberg, two of the strongest players of that time. In 1890 he finished third in Graz behind Gyula Makovetz and Johann Hermann Bauer, then shared first prize with his brother Berthold in a tournament in Berlin. In spring 1892, he won two tournaments in London, the second and stronger of these without losing a game. At New York 1893, he won all thirteen games, one of a small number of significant tournaments in history in which a player achieved a perfect score. Wikipedia article: List of world records in chess#Perfect tournament and match scores

After Lasker won the title, he answered his critics who considered that the title match was by an unproven player against an aging champion by being on the leader board in every tournament before World War I, including wins at St Petersburg in 1895-96, Nurenberg 1896, London 1899, Paris 1900 ahead of Harry Nelson Pillsbury (by two points with a score of +14 −1 =1), Trenton Falls 1906, and St Petersburg in 1914. He also came 3rd at Hastings 1895 (this relatively poor result possibly occurring during convalescence after nearly dying from typhoid fever), 2nd at Cambridge Springs in 1904, and =1st at the Chigorin Memorial tournament in St Petersburg in 1909. In 1918, a few months after the war, Lasker won a quadrangular tournament in Berlin against Akiba Rubinstein, Carl Schlechter and Siegbert Tarrasch.

After he lost the title in 1921, Lasker remained in the top rank of players, winning at Maehrisch-Ostrau (1923) ahead of Richard Reti, Ernst Gruenfeld, Alexey Selezniev, Savielly Tartakower, and Max Euwe. His last tournament win was at New York 1924, where he scored 80% and finished 1.5 points ahead of Jose Raul Capablanca, followed by Alexander Alekhine and Frank Marshall. In 1925, he came 2nd at Moscow behind Efim Bogoljubov and ahead of Capablanca, Marshall, Tartakower, and Carlos Torre Repetto. There followed a long hiatus from chess caused by his intention to retire from the game, but he re-emerged in top-class chess in 1934, placing 5th in Zurich behind Alekhine, Euwe, Salomon Flohr and Bogoljubow and ahead of Ossip Bernstein, Aron Nimzowitsch, and Gideon Stahlberg. In Moscow in 1935, Lasker finished in an undefeated third place, a half point behind Mikhail Botvinnik and Flohr and ahead of Capablanca, Rudolf Spielmann, unknown player, Grigory Levenfish, Andre Lilienthal, and Viacheslav Ragozin. Reuben Fine hailed the 66-year-old Lasker's performance as "a biological miracle". In 1936, Lasker placed 6th in Moscow and finished his career later that year at Nottingham when he came =7th with 8.5/14 (+6 -3 =5), his last-round game being the following stylish win: Lasker vs C H Alexander, 1936.

Matches

Non-title matches 1889 saw his long career in match play commence, one which only ceased upon relinquishing his title in 1921. He won nearly of his matches, apart from a few drawn mini-matches, including a drawn one-game play-off match against his brother Berthold in Berlin in 1890, losing only exhibition matches with Mikhail Chigorin, Carl Schlechter and Marshall, and a knight-odds match against Nellie Showalter, Jackson Showalter's wife. In 1889, he defeated Curt von Bardeleben (+1 =2) and in 1889-90 he beat Jacques Mieses (+5 =3). In 1890, he defeated Henry Bird (+7 -2 =3) and Nicholas Theodore Miniati (+3 =2 -0), and in 1891 he beat Francis Joseph Lee (+1 =1) and Berthold Englisch (+2 =3). 1892 and 1893 saw Lasker getting into his stride into the lead up to his title match with Steinitz, beating Bird a second time (5-0) Lasker - Bird (1892) , Joseph Henry Blackburne (+6 =4), Jackson Whipps Showalter (+6 -2 =2) and Celso Golmayo Zupide (+2 =1). In 1892, Lasker toured and played a series of mini-matches against leading players in the Manhattan, Brooklyn and Franklin Chess Clubs. At the Manhattan Chess Club, he played a series of three-game matches, defeating James Moore Hanham, Gustave Simonson, David Graham Baird, Charles B Isaacson, Albert Hodges, Eugene Delmar, John S Ryan and John Washington Baird of the 24 games he played against these players he won 21, losing one to Hodges and drawing one each with Simonson and Delmar. At the Brooklyn Chess Club, Lasker played two mini-matches of two games each, winning each game against Abel Edward Blackmar and William M De Visser, and drew the first game of an unfinished match against Philip Richardson. Lasker finished 1892 at the Franklin Chess Club by playing 5 mini-matches of two games each against its leading players, winning every game against Dion Martinez, Alfred K Robinson, unknown player and Hermann G Voigt and drawing a match (+1 -1) with Walter Penn Shipley. Shipley offered cash bonuses if he could stipulate the openings and taking up the challenge, Lasker played the Two Knight's Defense and won in 38 moves, while in the second game, Shipley won as Black in 24 moves against Lasker playing the White end of a Vienna Gambit, Steinitz variation (Opening Explorer). Shipley, who counted both Lasker and Steinitz as his friends, was instrumental in arranging the Philadelphia leg of the Lasker-Steinitz match, that being games 9, 10 and 11. 29 years later, Shipley was also the referee of Lasker's title match with Capablanca. In 1892-3, Lasker also played and won some other matches against lesser players including Andres Clemente Vazquez (3-0), A Ponce (first name Albert) (2-0) and Alfred K Ettlinger (5-0). Also in 1893, Mrs. Nellie Showalter, wife of Jackson Showalter and one of the leading women players in the USA, defeated Lasker 5-2 in a match receiving Knight odds.

These matches pushed Lasker to the forefront of chess, and after being refused a match by Tarrasch, he defeated Steinitz for the world title in 1894 after spreadeagling the field at New York 1893. While he was World Champion, Lasker played some non-title matches, the earliest of which was a six-game exhibition match against Chigorin in 1903 which he lost 2.5-3.5 (+1 -2 =3); the match was intended as a rigorous test of the Rice Gambit, which was the stipulated opening in each game. In the midst of his four title defenses that were held between 1907 and 1910, Lasker played and won what appears to have been a short training match against Abraham Speijer (+2 =1) in 1908. Also in 1908, he played another Rice Gambit-testing match, this time against Schlechter, again losing, this time by 1-4 (+0 =2 -3), apparently prompting a rethink of the Rice Gambit as a viable weapon.** In 1909 he drew a short match (2 wins 2 losses) against David Janowski and several months later they played a longer match that Lasker easily won (7 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss). Lasker accepted a return match and they played a title match in 1910 (details below). In 1914, he drew a 2 game exhibition match against Bernstein (+1 -1) and in 1916, he defeated Tarrasch in another, clearly non-title, match by 5.5-0.5. After Lasker lost his title in 1921, he is not known to have played another match until he lost a two-game exhibition match (=1 -1) against Marshall in 1940, a few months before he died. A match between Dr. Lasker and Dr. Vidmar had been planned for 1925, but it did not eventuate.***

World Championship matches The Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894) was played in New York, Philadelphia, and Montreal. Lasker won with 10 wins, 5 losses and 4 draws. Lasker also won the Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896), played in Moscow, with 10 wins, 2 losses, and 5 draws. At one stage when Rezso Charousek ‘s star was in the ascendant, Lasker was convinced he would eventually play a title match with the Hungarian master; unfortunately, Charousek died from tuberculosis in 1900, aged 26, before this could happen. As it turned out, he did not play another World Championship for 11 years until the Lasker - Marshall World Championship Match (1907), which was played in New York, Philadelphia, Washington, Baltimore, Chicago, Memphis. Lasker won this easily, remaining undefeated with 8 wins and 7 draws.

After a prolonged period of somewhat strained relations due to Tarrasch's refusal of Lasker's offer for a match, Lasker accepted Tarrasch's challenge for the title, and the Lasker - Tarrasch World Championship Match (1908) was played in Düsseldorf and Munich, with Lasker winning with 8 wins 3 losses and five draws. In 1910, Lasker came close to losing his title when he was trailing by a full point at the tenth and last game of the Lasker - Schlechter World Championship Match (1910) (the match being played in Vienna and Berlin); Schlechter held the advantage and could have drawn the game with ease on several occasions, however, he pursued a win, ultimately blundering a Queen endgame to relinquish his match lead and allow Lasker to retain the title. Some months later, the Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910) - played in Berlin - was Lasker's final successful defense of his title, winning with 8 wins and 3 draws.

In 1912 Lasker and Rubinstein, agreed to play a World Championship match in the fall of 1914 but the match was cancelled when World War I broke out. The war delayed all further title match negotiations until Lasker finally relinquished his title upon resigning from the Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921) in Havana while trailing by four games.

Life, legacy and testimonials

Lasker's extended absences from chess were due to his pursuit of other activities, including mathematics and philosophy. He spent the last years of the 19th century writing his doctorate. Between 1902 and 1907, he played only at Cambridge Springs, using his time in the US. It was during this period that he introduced the notion of a primary ideal, which corresponds to an irreducible variety and plays a role similar to prime powers in the prime decomposition of an integer. He proved the primary decomposition theorem for an ideal of a polynomial ring in terms of primary ideals in a paper Zur Theorie der Moduln und Ideale published in volume 60 of Mathematische Annalen in 1905. A commutative ring R is now called a 'Lasker ring' if every ideal of R can be represented as an intersection of a finite number of primary ideals. Lasker's results on the decomposition of ideals into primary ideals was the foundation on which Emmy Noether built an abstract theory which developed ring theory into a major mathematical topic and provided the foundations of modern algebraic geometry. Noether's Idealtheorie in Ringbereichen (1921) was of fundamental importance in the development of modern algebra, generalising Lasker's results by giving the decomposition of ideals into intersections of primary ideals in any commutative ring with ascending chain condition.****

After Lasker lost his title, he spent a considerable amount of time playing bridge and intended to retire. However, he returned to chess in the mid-thirties as he needed to raise money after the Nazis had confiscated his properties and life savings. After the tournament in Moscow in 1936, the Laskers were encouraged to stay on and Emanuel accepted an invitation to become a member of the Moscow Academy of Science to pursue his mathematical studies, with both he and his wife, Martha, taking up permanent residence in Moscow. At this time, he also renounced his German citizenship and took on Soviet citizenship. Although Stalin's purges prompted the Laskers to migrate to the USA in 1937, it is unclear whether they ever renounced their Soviet citizenship.

Lasker was friends with Albert Einstein who wrote the introduction to the posthumous biography Emanuel Lasker, The Life of a Chess Master by Dr. Jacques Hannak (1952), writing: Emanuel Lasker was undoubtedly one of the most interesting people I came to know in my later years. We must be thankful to those who have penned the story of his life for this and succeeding generations. For there are few men who have had a warm interest in all the great human problems and at the same time kept their personality so uniquely independent.

Lasker published several chess books but as he was also a mathematician, games theorist, philosopher and even playwright, he published books in all these fields, except for the play which was performed on only one occasion. As a youth, his parents had recognised his potential and sent him to study in Berlin where he first learned to play serious chess. After he graduated from high school, he studied mathematics and philosophy at the universities in Berlin, Göttingen and Heidelberg. Lasker died in the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York in 1941, aged 72, and was buried in the Beth Olom Cemetery in Queens. He was survived by his wife and his sister, Lotta. On May 6, 2008, Dr. Lasker was among the first 40 German sportsmen to be elected into the "Hall of Fame des Deutschen Sports".

******

"It is not possible to learn much from him. One can only stand and wonder." - <Max Euwe> Euwe lost all three of his games against Lasker, the most lopsided result between any two world champions.

"My chess hero" - <Viktor Korchnoi>

"The greatest of the champions was, of course, Emanuel Lasker" - <Mikhail Tal>

"Lies and hypocrisy do not survive for long on the chessboard. The creative combination lies bare the presumption of a lie, while the merciless fact, culminating in a checkmate, contradicts the hypocrite." – <Emanuel Lasker>

*******

* E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker, 1889** http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... *** User: Karpova: Emanuel Lasker (kibitz #1449)

Notes Lasker played on the following consultation chess teams Em. Lasker / MacDonnell, Lasker / Taubenhaus, Em. Lasker / Maroczy, Em. Lasker / I Rice, Em. Lasker / Barasz / Breyer, Lasker / Pillsbury, Lasker / Chigorin / Marshall / Teichmann, Emanuel Lasker / William Ward-Higgs, Emanuel Lasker / Heinrich Wolf, Emanuel Lasker / Hermann Keidanski & Em. Lasker / L Lasek.

Wikipedia article: Emanuel Lasker
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...

Last updated: 2023-04-08 21:10:05

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 62; games 1-25 of 1,541  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Lasker vs NN 1-0101887Odds game000 Chess variants
2. NN vs Lasker  0-1331889SimulC41 Philidor Defense
3. A Reif vs Lasker 0-1131889Breslau Hauptturnier AA02 Bird's Opening
4. V Tietz vs Lasker 0-1401889Breslau Hauptturnier AC79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred
5. H Seger vs Lasker 0-1361889Hauptturnier Winners' GroupD30 Queen's Gambit Declined
6. Lasker vs Lipke 1-0471889Hauptturnier Winners' GroupC26 Vienna
7. L Mabillis vs Lasker 0-1241889Hauptturnier Winners' GroupC60 Ruy Lopez
8. E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker 1-0421889Hauptturnier Winners' GroupC30 King's Gambit Declined
9. E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker 0-1471889Hauptturnier play-offD00 Queen's Pawn Game
10. Lasker vs J Bauer 1-0381889AmsterdamA03 Bird's Opening
11. Lasker vs A van Foreest 1-0501889AmsterdamA04 Reti Opening
12. R Loman vs Lasker 0-1221889AmsterdamC79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred
13. L van Vliet vs Lasker 1-0241889AmsterdamC41 Philidor Defense
14. R Leather vs Lasker 0-1561889AmsterdamA07 King's Indian Attack
15. Gunsberg vs Lasker 0-1351889AmsterdamC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
16. Lasker vs Mason ½-½381889AmsterdamC46 Three Knights
17. Lasker vs S Polner 0-1211889Casual gameC26 Vienna
18. Lasker vs Burn ½-½151889AmsterdamC01 French, Exchange
19. J Mieses vs Lasker 0-1281889Casual gameA07 King's Indian Attack
20. von Bardeleben vs Lasker ½-½271889Lasker - Bardeleben mD50 Queen's Gambit Declined
21. Lasker vs von Bardeleben 1-0471889Lasker - Bardeleben mB06 Robatsch
22. von Bardeleben vs Lasker 1-0501889Lasker - Bardeleben mC26 Vienna
23. Lasker vs J Mieses 1-0371889Lasker - Mieses 1889/90A80 Dutch
24. J Mieses vs Lasker ½-½601889Lasker - Mieses 1889/90A07 King's Indian Attack
25. Lasker vs J Mieses ½-½701890Lasker - Mieses 1889/90D21 Queen's Gambit Accepted
 page 1 of 62; games 1-25 of 1,541  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Lasker wins | Lasker loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 17 OF 99 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-22-05  MrSifter: But there is one thing that was uncalled for by Snoop. Where did you get any idea of racism from vampiero's comments. If someone says something about a black person, puts them down in anyway, this still makes no reference to the group as a whole.

Snoop, you are the one who perceived it as a racist comment which shows that you are the one with that type of "racially aware" mindset. You were right when you said we don't this kind of racism on this board. Well, then don't bring it up!

Jun-22-05  tud: Vampiero might be right ;-), jews are stronger inside other countries (look at Israel, not much there to be proud of :-) but there are some other facts: a good sense of unity and a strong respect for culture. It`s not genes, it`s education. Steinitz, Lasker, Botvinnik, Tal were jews. Smyslov, Fischer, Kasparov are half. This makes it 5.5. Morphy, Capablanca, Alekhine, Euwe, Spasski,Karpov are not (even if here and there BS goes). Kramnik is a debate (I have curly hair damn it and big nose and I am romanian). Vampiero might be right about superior races ;-) Adolf Hitler a great scientist from the 20th century found the same thing about pure arians and a lot of science has been written about it:-) I wonder what would be Lasker`s opinion since he was there during that research...
Jun-22-05  MrSifter: Kramnik is 1/8 jewish. In 2001, an encyclopedia of famous jews tried to include kramnik (after his defeat of kasparov) and he refused, saying he is only 1/8 jewish and doesn't consider himself a jew. I must say he looks like a very typical jew but his real last name is "sokolov." I guess he really is just part jewish.
Jun-22-05  MrSifter: <tud> Adolf Hitler found the same thing? He said that jews were inferior in every way to the Aryan race. How does this fit into "ashkenazim having a certain gene that raises intelligence." I need to add that I believe these both to be idiotic rants.
Jun-23-05  vampiero: the facts lie befoer you, the acticle clearly states that about 4 out of 1000 NORTHERN eurpeans have an IQ over 140 (if my memory is correct and somewhere around 23 or 24 out of 1000 ashkinazi jews have that, isn't that a big difference. how can u explain. maybe you can believe that i am a racist (i dont believe that a certain race is bad, i just tend to look at things percentage wise), i think that just like there is a big percent of asian people that are shorter to swiss people (percentage wise!!!), and because many germans are blond haired, blue eyed, so like those physical differences, there are also mental, and psycological differences in races. and read the article, far from everyone disagreed with the scientists.

"I highly doubt it because there arn't that many people who have the naturel talent to be a Tennis champion and chess champion at birth. to attain a top notch level, a person has to be naturally talented AND work at it.

im NOT saying Jews are better, how many Jewish sportsmen or olymic gold medalists do you see. Im just saying that due to these characteristics of different races, Jews have a BETTER (NOT PERFECT) percentage of chess GM's or scientists in the world than MOST other races(not all)

PS: I said better PERCENTAGE, that means the out of 100 scientists, if 10 of them are, compared to the 0.2% population of the world they make up, thats pretty darn good

Jun-23-05  vampiero: and just so you know <tud>, Israel has quite alot to be proud off, first of all, all the american special forces are trained IN israel for an elite type of fighting style invented by an israeli, called KRAV MAGA(not sure how to spell it). Israel has the best airforce in the world, they buy american aiplanes and they put in their own technology. there have bin multiple wars, most notably the so called "six day war" were Israel was invaded by 3 neiboring countries, syria, jordan, and egypt and took them all out and even gained land. another is when it was attacked of Saturday (which is a holy day in isral) and the army was off duty, israel stopped the attack and defeated the country attacking (i believe it was Syria or maybe Egypt, not sure 100%) to add to that, Israel is in the middle east and has been around for about 60 years. and if you go to the CIA world factbox on the internet, you can read about them, "high-technology projects (including aviation, communications, computer-aided design and manufactures, medical electronics, fiber optics)" so dont start talking about how bad a country is that is slightly smaller than New Jersey with a population of 6.3 million
Jun-23-05  acirce: <most notably the so called "six day war" were Israel was invaded by 3 neiboring countries, syria, jordan, and egypt and took them all out and even gained land.>

It was a war of aggression from Israel's side. You're right about the "gaining land" issue though, but most people would not consider brutally occupying and stealing large chunks of territory anything to be proud of. Golan and East Jerusalem was annexed, and West Bank and Gaza controlled to this day keeping millions of Palestinians under a terror regime.

Jun-23-05  vampiero: it was a "war of aggression" of israels side only in one way, their intelligence agency was one of the best back then and attacked first. it is a historical fact that they were going to be attacked. after isreal had sent some planes below 50 feat to escape radar and destroy the egyptian airforce, jordan then sent insurgents and regular into the israeli half of jerusalem and was beaten back, and syrias troops, artillery and tanks (whom which israel had trouble with because they were bought from Russia) were already marching towards israel too. its called a pre-emptive strike, thats the benefit of good intelligence agency.
Jun-23-05  vonKrolock: <Maroczy: RE:father decided to make chess stars out of his daughters.> You should read attentively <Susan Polgar> page here in chessgames.com - At the beginning, Zsuzsa discovered herself Chess when she was a little child, what You call "decision" was (like in the life of other prodigy-children) the result of the revelation of extraordinary talent (also demonstrated by her sisters)

<Smyslov, Kasparov, Kramnik> presumably also <Fischer> and still other ocurrences - read Spassky's page here for some questions still not answered : All have Jewish AND Christian background - and they are among the greatest: An argument for comprehension and harmony!

Jun-23-05  MrSifter: <vampiero> Israel has foreign aid to be proud about. $3 billion a year from the U.S. and more importantly, much more than that in loans, and most of those loans end up being "pardoned" anyway. I think i posted somewhere else on this site that if you take the total amount of aid Israel gets from the U.S. in anyway, whether from the government or jewish organizations or private donations or fundraisers, it comes out to be about $25,000 per head. And that's without the loans.

Israel won in 1967 in impressive style, ('48 and '73 are a completely different story) but you have to remember who they're fighting against, backwards religious fanatics who were very primitive and wouldn't have assembled any type of military force if they didn't have help from the Soviets.

With so much extra money pouring into the Israeli economy, and their obvious need for security, it is quite logical that they are good in military technology and all the sort. They are the only country today that really needs to do this type of heated research and development. The same goes for their great intelligence agency the mossad, other western countries simply don't need to worry about political intelligence anymore. Those days are over.

Jun-23-05  MrSifter: I think Jewish chess strength has to do with them being quite numerous in Germany and Russia (the countries where chess has been the most popular since the mid 19th century) and their cultural attachment to the game. In the USSR, many many jewish boys pursued chess, and that's why they have produced such high class players from that time period like boleslavsky, bronstein, geller, stein, botvinnik, tal, etc. The same goes for late 19th century Germany/Austria which produced Steinitz, Tarrasch, Reti, Nimzowitsch(actually from Latvia) and Lasker.

These days, things are different. Of the "future world champions" that anyone is talking about, how many are jewish? Karjakin, Carlsen, Radjabov, Nakamura? None are jews. How about the early 20's stars? Ponomariov, Grischuk, Bacrot, Leko? None are jews. Has anyone noticed that Ukrainians are now producing GM's like hotcakes? Are we now led to believe that they have a certain gene that raises intelligence??

Jun-23-05  WMD: But, of course, it doesn't have to be an either/or choice between genetics and culture.

That Ashkenazi Jews as a group have a higher than average IQ has been known for a long time. As has the fact that blacks as a group score below average.

Also pertinent is the fact that the high rate of Jewish intermarriage with non-Jews means the phenomenon is unlikely to persist.

Jun-23-05  farrooj: I'm still young and I don't understand politics much, but here there's a constant war between lebanon and Israel. The fact is that Arabs dont like Israel. For example, in 2000 they bombed lebanon several times. And there is the remaining fact that they invaded palestine. very agressive
Jun-23-05  acirce: What Israel did to Lebanon in 1982 remains one of the most shameful deeds in the awful history of the Zionist state. <farrooj> Are you from Lebanon? I was there in 2002, as well as in Syria, visiting Palestinian refugee camps. Shatila is what I remember most.
Jun-23-05  SnoopDogg: <Israel has the best airforce in the world> Hahahaha.

How many stealth fighters does Israel have again? 0

How many stealth fighters/bombers we have? Let's see the B-2 bomber (ironically inspired by the "Nazi flying wing"), F-22 and something like the F-117.

Jun-23-05  azaris: <SnoopDogg> Even in the air force, it's all about training and devotion to the service. I'd imagine the Israelis rank pretty high on this scale. Of course there are also lots of conscripts who can't figure out why they have to risk their necks to defend some guy's bungalow in the middle of Gaza Strip.
Jun-23-05  vampiero: modern genetic scientists say that people who have a strong dominating gene and the rest being mixed with other genes is the strongest type of genetic structure. for example, in thsi case it would be like 50% jewish, and possibly the rest split up between english and armenian and russian or something of the likes. So its possible that the intermarriage that is going on might just strenghten the jewish statistics, for example Kasparov, Spassky, Fischer, and others. In response to the fact that many of the "futur generations" grandmasters arn't jewish is because in the two big chess societies, german and russian, many jews have left either to the US or to Israel. Chess, no matter how popular it could be in the US, will alwlays be a difficult place to live and specialize in chess due to its lack of money. and israel as a state, is the place were many tournaments are held, and some of thestrongest simultaneous displays are held there. Kasparov has been there numerious times for simultaneous displays.
Jun-23-05  vampiero: and in response to the Israel subject. the war of Independance was fought by farmers with pitchforks against arabs with guns (not tanks obviously or todays world would have been different) and were outnumbered due to the limited amount of Jews who had gone there by that time, in the end the israelis still won. Plus, the fact is that israel is basically at constant war (which is a shame) but it was not they who were originally the agressors, and almost everysingle day you can here about another suicide bombing that kills 5 people, or ten or 15. What is israel supposed to do? just ignore it? its not like theres a big mystery of whos doing the suicide bombings, its pretty ofvious who it is. And in response to anyone who thinks that its ONLY extremists commiting the bombings, there are many video clips showing teenage boys shooting at tanks with AK47's and throwing rocks and such.
Jun-23-05  acirce: <almost everysingle day you can here about another suicide bombing that kills 5 people, or ten or 15.>

What the hell are you talking about? How many Israeli civilians have been killed in suicide attacks the past year, in how many attacks? Well, if you have to resort to such petty lies...

<What is israel supposed to do?>

Radical suggestion: stop the occupation, the terror, the humiliation, the collective punishment, the apartheid and the brutal oppression of millions of Palestinians. Give them a chance to build their own future in their own state.

<And in response to anyone who thinks that its ONLY extremists commiting the bombings, there are many video clips showing teenage boys shooting at tanks with AK47's and throwing rocks and such.>

Okay, so there are many people in the occupied territories who are ready to risk their lives in struggle against an incomparably stronger and mightier army. What does that tell you? It obviously has to be because they, um, HATE JEWS. Yeah, that's it.

Jun-23-05  aw1988: A rather faceless explaination. Sorry, that just isn't a model example.
Jun-23-05  Ziggurat: <modern genetic scientists say that people who have a strong dominating gene and the rest being mixed with other genes is the strongest type of genetic structure.> It would be interesting to hear exactly what these 'modern genetic scientists' mean by 'the strongest type of genetic structure'.
Jun-23-05  vampiero: all their saying is thats its good to have the majority of your genetics be from one racial group and the rest divided
Jun-23-05  MrSifter: <acirce> The occupation was initiated because Israel gained that land through a war that was started by the Arabs. It's hard to "stop the occupation and apartheid" when you know that once you do, you're just making it easier for them to attack you again. This has been historically true everytime Israel loosened its grip.
Jun-23-05  MrSifter: <acirce> And another thing, they do tend to yell "Itbach al Yahud!" a lot. This means, "Kill the Jews!"
Jun-23-05  MrSifter: <vampiero> Is your argument for a Jewish "genetic superiority" pertaining to chess or all around intelligence including chess?
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 99)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 17 OF 99 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC