chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jose Raul Capablanca
Capablanca 
 

Number of games in database: 1,252
Years covered: 1893 to 1941
Overall record: +374 -51 =268 (73.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 559 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (168) 
    C66 C78 C62 C84 C83
 Orthodox Defense (82) 
    D63 D51 D52 D50 D67
 Queen's Gambit Declined (69) 
    D30 D37 D31 D06 D38
 Queen's Pawn Game (56) 
    D02 D00 D05 D04 A46
 French Defense (56) 
    C12 C01 C10 C11 C14
 Four Knights (41) 
    C49 C48
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (54) 
    C72 C66 C68 C77 C73
 Orthodox Defense (53) 
    D67 D63 D53 D51 D64
 Queen's Pawn Game (41) 
    A46 D00 D02 D05 A45
 Caro-Kann (20) 
    B13 B18 B15 B12 B10
 Nimzo Indian (20) 
    E24 E34 E37 E23 E40
 French Defense (19) 
    C01 C12 C15 C17 C10
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Capablanca vs Tartakower, 1924 1-0
   Capablanca vs Marshall, 1918 1-0
   Lasker vs Capablanca, 1921 0-1
   O Bernstein vs Capablanca, 1914 0-1
   A Nimzowitsch vs Capablanca, 1927 0-1
   Janowski vs Capablanca, 1916 0-1
   Capablanca vs K Treybal, 1929 1-0
   Marshall vs Capablanca, 1909 0-1
   Capablanca vs M Fonaroff, 1918 1-0
   Capablanca vs Spielmann, 1927 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921)
   Capablanca - Alekhine World Championship Match (1927)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Rice Memorial (1916)
   Capablanca - Marshall (1909)
   New York Masters (1915)
   Hastings (1919)
   American National (1913)
   Rice CC Masters (1913)
   New York (1918)
   London (1922)
   Barcelona (1929)
   New York International (1931)
   Moscow (1936)
   St. Petersburg (1914)
   Karlsbad (1929)
   New York (1924)
   Moscow (1925)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Casabianca cautions Fredthebear by fredthebear
   Casablanca by rpn4
   Capablanca! by Sven W
   Capablanca! by wvb933
   Capablanca! by chocobonbon
   Match Capablanca! by amadeus
   Match Capablanca! by Okavango
   Capablanca plays the world....(I) by MissScarlett
   Capablanca plays the world... (II) by MissScarlett
   Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games by dcruggeroli
   Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games by Okavango
   Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games by bjamin74
   Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games by pdoaks
   Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games by alip

GAMES ANNOTATED BY CAPABLANCA: [what is this?]
   Lasker vs Capablanca, 1921
   Capablanca vs Lasker, 1921
   Lasker vs Schlechter, 1910
   Capablanca vs Lasker, 1921
   A Nimzowitsch vs Capablanca, 1913
   >> 27 GAMES ANNOTATED BY CAPABLANCA


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Jose Raul Capablanca
Search Google for Jose Raul Capablanca

JOSE RAUL CAPABLANCA
(born Nov-19-1888, died Mar-08-1942, 53 years old) Cuba

[what is this?]

José Raúl Capablanca y Graupera was the third World Champion, reigning from 1921 until 1927. Renowned for the simplicity of his play, his legendary endgame prowess, accuracy, and the speed of his play, he earned the nickname of the "Human Chess Machine".

Background

Capablanca, the second son of a Spanish Army officer, was born in Havana. He learned to play at an early age by watching his father and defeated Cuban Champion Juan Corzo in an informal match in 1901 by 6.5-5.5 (+4 −3 =5), turning 13 years of age during the match. Despite this and despite taking 4th place in the first Cuban Championship in 1902, he did not focus on chess until 1908 when he left Columbia University where he had enrolled to study chemical engineering and play baseball. He did, however, join the Manhattan Chess Club in 1905, soon establishing his dominance in rapid chess. He won a rapid chess tournament in 1906 ahead of the World Champion Emanuel Lasker, and played many informal games against him. Within a year or two of dropping out of university and after playing simultaneous exhibitions in dozens of US cities, winning over 95% of his games, Capablanca had established himself as one of the top players in the world, especially after the Capablanca - Marshall (1909) New York match exhibition win 15-8 (+8 -1 =14).

Tournaments

Capablanca won the 1910 New York State Championship by defeating co-leader Charles Jaffe in a tiebreaker match. In 1911, he placed second in the National Tournament in New York, with 9½ out of 12, half a point behind Marshall, and half a point ahead of Jaffe and Oscar Chajes. There followed Capablanca's groundbreaking win at San Sebastian (1911) with 9½/14 (+6 -1 =7), ahead of Akiba Rubinstein and Milan Vidmar on 9, Marshall on 8.5, and other luminaries such as Carl Schlechter, Siegbert Tarrasch and Ossip Bernstein. Before the tournament, Aron Nimzowitsch protested the unknown Capablanca's involvement in the event, but the latter demonstrated his credentials by defeating Nimzowitsch in their game. Winning at San Sebastian was only the second time a player had won a major tournament at his first attempt since Harry Pillsbury 's triumph at Hastings in 1895, and it provided a powerful boost to his credibility to challenge for the world title. He did so, but the match did not take place for another 10 years.

In early 1913, Capablanca won a tournament in New York with 11/13 (+10 -1 =2), half a point ahead of Marshall. Capablanca then finished second with 10/14 (+8 -2 =4), a half point behind Marshall in Havana, losing one of their individual games, rumour having it that he asked the mayor to clear the room so that no one would see him resign. Returning to New York, Capablanca won all thirteen games at the New York tournament of 1913, played at the Rice Chess Club. 1914 saw the <"tournament of champions"> played at St. Petersburg. Capablanca, with 13/18 (+10 -2 =6), came second behind Lasker and well ahead of Alexander Alekhine on 10, Tarrasch on 8.5 and Marshall on 8.

After the outbreak of World War I, Capablanca stayed in New York and won tournaments held there in 1915 (13/14 (+12 -0 =2)), 1916 (14/17 (+12 -1 =4)) and 1918 (10.5/12 (+9 =3)). During the New York 1918 tournament, Marshall played his prepared Marshall Attack of the Ruy Lopez* against Capablanca, but Capablanca worked his way through the complications and won. Soon after the war, Capablanca crossed the Atlantic to decisively win the Hastings Victory Tournament 1919 with 10.5/11, a point ahead of Borislav Kostic.

Capablanca did not play another tournament until 1922, the year after he won the title from Lasker. During his reign, he won London 1922 with 13/15 (no losses), 1.5 points ahead of Alekhine; placed second behind Lasker at New York 1924 (suffering his first loss in eight years – to Richard Reti – since his 1916 lost to Oscar Chajes); placed 3rd at Moscow in 1925 behind Efim Bogoljubov and Lasker respectively with +9 =9 -2; won at Lake Hopatcong (New York) 1926 with 6/8 (+4 =4), a point ahead of Abraham Kupchik and won at New York in 1927 with 14/20 (+10 -1 =9), 2.5 points clear of Alekhine, his last tournament before his title match with Alekhine. During the latter tournament, Capablanca, Alekhine, Rudolf Spielmann, Milan Vidmar, Nimzowitsch and Marshall played a quadruple round robin, wherein Capablanca finished undefeated, winning the mini-matches with each of his rivals, 2½ points ahead of second-placed Alekhine, and won the "best game" prize for a win over Spielmann. This result, plus the fact that Alekhine had never defeated him in a game, made him a strong favourite to retain his title in the upcoming match against Alekhine. However, Alekhine's superior preparation prevailed against Capablanca's native talent.

After losing the title, Capablanca settled in Paris and engaged in a flurry of tournament competition aimed at improving his chances for a rematch with Alekhine. However the latter dodged him, refusing to finalise negotiations for a rematch, boycotting events that included Capablanca, and insisting that Capablanca not be invited to tournaments in which he participated. In 1928, Capablanca won at Budapest with 7/9 (+5 =4), a point ahead of Marshall, and at Berlin with 8.5/12 (+5 =7), 1.5 points ahead of Nimzowitsch; he also came second at Bad Kissingen with 7/11 (+4 -1 =6), after Bogoljubov. In 1929, Capablanca won at Ramsgate with 5.5/7 (+4 =3) ahead of Vera Menchik and Rubinstein, at Budapest with 10.5/13 (+8 =5), and at Barcelona with 13.5/14, two points clear of Savielly Tartakower he also came equal second with Spielmann and behind Nimzowitsch at Carlsbad with 14.5/21 (+10 -2 =9). He won at the 1929-30 Hastings tournament and came second at Hastings in 1930-31, behind Max Euwe, his only loss being to Sultan Khan. Several months later he won New York for the last time, this time with a score of 10/11 (+9 =2) ahead of Isaac Kashdan.

Perhaps discouraged by his inability to secure a rematch with Alekhine, there followed a hiatus for over three years before he reentered the fray with a fourth placing at Hastings in 1934-35 with 5.5/9 (+4 -2 =3), behind Sir George Thomas, Euwe and Salomon Flohr but ahead of Mikhail Botvinnik and Andre Lilienthal. In 1935, he secured 4th place in Moscow with 12/19 (+7 -2 =10), a point behind Botvinnik and Flohr, and a half point behind the evergreen Lasker. Also in 1935, he came second at Margate with 7/9 (+6 -1 =2), half a point behind Samuel Reshevsky. 1936 was a very successful year, coming 2nd at Margate with 7/9 (+5 =4), a half point behind Flohr, but then he moved up a gear to take Moscow with 13/18 (+8 =10), a point ahead of Botvinnik who in turn was 2.5 points ahead of Flohr, and then came =1st with Botvinnik at the famous Nottingham tournament, with 10/14 (+7 -1 =6) ahead of Euwe, Reuben Fine and Reshevsky on 9.5, and Flohr and Lasker on 8.5. These latter two results were the only tournaments in which he finished ahead of Lasker, which enhanced his chances of challenging for the title, but a challenge to World Champion Euwe was out of the question until after the Euwe - Alekhine World Championship Rematch (1937) , which was won by Alekhine. In 1937, Capablanca came =3rd with Reshevsky at Semmering with 7.5/14 (+2 -1 =11) behind Paul Keres and Fine and in 1938 he won the Paris tournament with 8/10 (+6 =4) ahead of Nicolas Rossolimo. The worst result of his career occurred at the AVRO tournament which was played in several cities in the Netherlands in 1938, placing 7th out of 8 players with 6/14 (+2 -4 =8), the only time he ever had a negative score in a tournament. His health in this tournament was fragile as he had suffered severe hypertension, which affected his concentration towards the end of his games; he may have also suffered a slight stroke halfway through the tournament. Travelling between the numerous cities in which the tournament was played was also hard on the ageing master. In 1939 he played his last tournament at Margate, placing =2nd with Flohr on 6.5/9 (+4 =5) a point behind Keres. Shortly afterwards, he finished his playing career – albeit unknowingly - in a blaze of glory by winning gold with +7 =9 on board one for Cuba at the 8th Olympiad in Buenos Aires.

Matches

In addition to the informal match against Corzo in 1901 and the exhibition match against Marshall in 1909 (see above), Capablanca played a three-game match against Charles Jaffe in New York in 1912, winning two and drawing one, and won the first game of a match against Chajes before the latter withdrew from the match. In 1914, he defeated Ossip Bernstein 1.5-0.5, Tartakower by 1.5-0.5 and Andre Aurbach by 2-0. On his way to the 1914 tournament in St Petersburg, he played two-game matches against Richard Teichmann and Jacques Mieses in Berlin, winning all his games. Once he reached Saint Petersburg, he played similar matches against Alexander Alekhine, Eugene Znosko-Borovsky and Fyodor Duz-Khotimirsky, losing one game to Znosko-Borovsky and winning the rest. In 1919, Capablanca accepted a challenge to a match from Borislav Kostić who had come second at New York in 1918 without dropping a game. The match was to go to the first player to win eight games, but Kostić resigned from the match, played in Havana, after losing five straight games - Capablanca - Kostic (1919). In late 1931, just before his temporary retirement from top-level chess, Capablanca also won a match (+2 −0 =8) against Euwe - Capablanca - Euwe (1931).

World Championship

Capablanca's win at San Sebastian in 1911 provided the results and the impetus for Capablanca to negotiate with Lasker for a title match, but some of Lasker's conditions were unacceptable to Capablanca, especially one requiring the challenger to win by two points to take the title, while the advent of World War I delayed the match. In 1920, Lasker and Capablanca agreed to play the title match in 1921, but a few months later, the former was ready to surrender the title without a contest, saying, "You have earned the title not by the formality of a challenge, but by your brilliant mastery." A significant stake ($25,000, $13,000 guaranteed to Lasker) was raised that induced Lasker to play in Havana where Capablanca won the Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921) - without losing a game - after Lasker resigned from the match when trailing by 4 games, the first time a World Champion had lost his title without winning a game until the victory by Vladimir Kramnik in the Kasparov - Kramnik Classical World Championship Match (2000). From 1921 to 1923, Alekhine, Rubinstein and Nimzowitsch all challenged Capablanca, but only Alekhine could raise the money stipulated in the so-called "London Rules", which these players had signed in 1921. A group of Argentinean businessmen, backed by a guarantee from the president of Argentina, promised the funds for a World Championship match between Capablanca and Alekhine, and once the deadline for Nimzowitsch to lodge a deposit for a title match had passed, the title match was agreed to, beginning in September 1927. Capablanca lost the Capablanca - Alekhine World Championship Match (1927) at Buenos Aires in 1927 by +3 -6 =25 in the longest title match ever, until it was surpassed by the legendary Karpov - Kasparov World Championship Match (1984/85). The match lasted over ten weeks, taking place behind closed doors, thus precluding spectators and photographers. All but two of the 34 games opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined. Before Capablanca and Alekhine left Buenos Aires after the match, they agreed in principle to stage a rematch, with Alekhine essentially sticking with the conditions initially imposed by Capablanca. Despite on-again off-again negotiations over the next 13 years, the rematch never materialised, with Alekhine playing two title matches each against Bogolyubov and Euwe in the subsequent decade. While Capablanca and Alekhine were both representing their countries at the Buenos Aires Olympiad in 1939, an attempt was made by Augusto de Muro, the President of the Argentine Chess Federation, to arrange a World Championship match between the two. Alekhine declined, saying he was obliged to be available to defend his adopted homeland, France, as World War II had just broken out. A couple of days prior to this, Capablanca had declined to play when his Cuban team played France, headed by Alekhine, in the Olympiad.

Simultaneous exhibitions

Capablanca's legendary speed of play lent itself to the rigours of simultaneous play, and he achieved great success in his exhibitions. From December 1908 through February 1909, Capablanca toured the USA and in 10 exhibitions he won 168 games in a row before losing a game in Minneapolis; his final tally for that tour was 734 games, winning 96.7% (+703 =19 -12). In March and April 1911, Capablanca toured Europe for the first time, giving exhibitions in France and Germany scoring +234=33-19. Once completed, he proceeded to San Sebastian and his historic victory before again touring Europe via its cities of Rotterdam, Leiden, Middelburg, The Hague, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Hamburg, Berlin, Breslau, Allenstein, Prague, Budapest, Vienna, Stuttgart, Mannheim, Frankfurt, Paris, London and Birmingham at the end of which his tally was +532=66-54. After he received his job as a roving ambassador-at-large from the Cuban Foreign Office, Capablanca played a series of simuls in London, Paris, Berlin, Warsaw, Riga, Moscow, Kyiv, and Vienna on his way to St Petersburg in 1914, tallying +769=91-86. In 1922, Capablanca gave a simultaneous exhibition in Cleveland against 103 opponents, the largest in history up to that time, winning 102 and drawing one – setting a record for the best winning percentage ever – 99.5% - in a large simultaneous exhibition. In 1925 Capablanca gave a simultaneous exhibition in Leningrad and won every game but one, a loss against 12-year-old Mikhail Botvinnik, whom he predicted would one day be champion. Capablanca still holds the record for the most games ever completed in simultaneous exhibitions, playing and completing 13545 games between 1901-1940.**

Legacy, testimonials and life

Soon after gaining the title, Capablanca married Gloria Simoni Betancourt in Havana. They had a son, José Raúl Jr., in 1923 and a daughter, Gloria, in 1925. His father died in 1923 and his mother in 1926. In 1937 he divorced Gloria and in 1938 married Olga Chagodayev, a Russian princess.

Capablanca's famous "invincible" streak extended from February 10, 1916, when he lost to Oscar Chajes in the New York 1916 tournament, to March 21, 1924, when he lost to Richard Réti in the New York International tournament. During this time he played 63 games, winning 40 and drawing 23, including his successful title match against Lasker. Between 1914 and his World Championship match against Alekhine, Capablanca had only lost four games of the 158 match and tournament games he had played. In match, team match, and tournament play from 1909 to 1939 he scored +318=249-34. Only Spielmann held his own (+2 −2 =8) against Capablanca, apart from Keres who had a narrow plus score against him (+1 −0 =5) due to his win at the AVRO 1938 tournament, during which the ailing Capablanca turned 50, while Keres was 22.

Capablanca played himself in Chess Fever http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0015673/, a short film shot by V. Pudovkin at the 1925 Moscow tournament. The film can be seen at http://video.google.com/videoplay?d....

On 7 March 1942, Capablanca collapsed at the Manhattan Chess Club and he was taken to Mount Sinai Hospital, where he died the next morning from "a cerebral haemorrhage provoked by hypertension". Emanuel Lasker had died in the same hospital the year before. Capablanca's body was given a public funeral in Havana's Colón Cemetery a week later, with President Batista taking personal charge of the funeral arrangements.

Capablanca proposed a new chess variant, played on a 10x10 board or a 10x8 board. He introduced two new pieces. The chancellor had the combined moves of a rook and knight (the piece could move like a rook or a knight). The other piece was the archbishop which had the combined moves of a bishop and knight.

Capablanca‘s style also heavily influenced the styles of later World Champions Botvinnik, Robert James Fischer and Anatoly Karpov. Botvinnik observed that Alekhine had received much schooling from Capablanca in positional play before their fight for the world title made them bitter enemies. While not a theoretician as such, he wrote several books including A Primer of Chess, Chess Fundamentals and My Chess Career.

Alekhine: <…Capablanca was snatched from the chess world much too soon. With his death, we have lost a very great chess genius whose like we shall never see again.>

Lasker: <I have known many chess players, but only one chess genius: Capablanca.>

Notes

Capablanca occasionally played consultation on the team consisting of Reti / Capablanca.

Sources:

Bill Wall's Chess Master Profiles - http://billwall.phpwebhosting.com/a...; Edward Winter's article A Question of Credibiity: http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...; Chess Corner's article on Capablanca: http://www.chesscorner.com/worldcha... and <kingcrusher>'s online article at http://www.gtryfon.demon.co.uk/bcc/.... A list of books about Capablanca can be found at http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/....

* Ruy Lopez, Marshall (C89) ** http://www.fide.com/component/conte...

Wikipedia article: José Raúl Capablanca

Last updated: 2025-03-16 04:08:07

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 51; games 1-25 of 1,252  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. R Iglesias vs Capablanca 0-1381893Odds game000 Chess variants
2. Capablanca vs E Delmonte 1-0181901Match-seriesB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
3. L Paredes vs Capablanca 0-1451901Match-seriesC44 King's Pawn Game
4. Capablanca vs E Corzo 1-0351901Match-seriesC67 Ruy Lopez
5. Capablanca vs A Fiol ½-½491901Match-seriesC45 Scotch Game
6. J Corzo vs Capablanca 1-0411901Havana casualB01 Scandinavian
7. A Gavilan vs Capablanca 0-1391901Match-seriesC45 Scotch Game
8. A Ettlinger vs Capablanca 0-1531901Casual gameC45 Scotch Game
9. Capablanca vs M Marceau 1-0311901Match-seriesC45 Scotch Game
10. M Sterling vs Capablanca ½-½501901HavanaC77 Ruy Lopez
11. Capablanca vs J A Blanco 1-0491901Match-seriesC45 Scotch Game
12. E Delmonte vs Capablanca 0-1321901Match-seriesD00 Queen's Pawn Game
13. Capablanca vs L Paredes 1-0291901Match-seriesC02 French, Advance
14. E Corzo vs Capablanca 1-0321901Match-seriesC11 French
15. Capablanca vs J Corzo 0-1601901Havana casualC45 Scotch Game
16. A Fiol vs Capablanca 0-1361901HavanaC55 Two Knights Defense
17. Capablanca vs A Gavilan 1-0771901Match-seriesC01 French, Exchange
18. Capablanca vs M Sterling 1-0301901HavanaC01 French, Exchange
19. Capablanca vs E Corzo 0-1301901Havana casualC40 King's Knight Opening
20. Capablanca vs E Corzo 1-0421901Havana casualC40 King's Knight Opening
21. J A Blanco vs Capablanca 0-1771901HavanaC55 Two Knights Defense
22. Capablanca vs C Echevarria 1-0491901Simul, 8bC44 King's Pawn Game
23. Capablanca vs J Corzo 0-1291901Capablanca - CorzoC45 Scotch Game
24. J Corzo vs Capablanca 1-0271901Capablanca - CorzoC52 Evans Gambit
25. Capablanca vs J Corzo ½-½611901Capablanca - CorzoA80 Dutch
 page 1 of 51; games 1-25 of 1,252  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Capablanca wins | Capablanca loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 181 OF 264 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-16-09  Shams: <although even that could be debated>

with a straight face?

Dec-16-09  MaxxLange: Capablanca's contemporaries did call him a "chess machine" I think, w/r/t his prowess in quick play , and his uncanny abilities to quickly assess a position

why did he lose to Alekhine? Alekhine got better. He wanted it more. He made a special study of finding and attacking Capa's weak points as a chess player. Capa got complacent and was beatable from the point of view of another chess great. Same old story!

Dec-16-09  MaxxLange: MACHINES ARE NOT CONSCIOUS

as far as I know

they don't know beauty, boredom, terror, satisfaction, or any mode of awareness, they just work

Dec-17-09  AnalyzeThis: Capablanca lost to Alekhine because during the match, he was seeing the ladies, instead of getting his proper rest for the next game.
Dec-17-09  ughaibu: Is it a joke? The deadpan delivery obscures any such intent.
Dec-17-09  whatthefat: <Shams: <although even that could be debated>

with a straight face?>

Sure, why not? Without any way of knowing what consciousness is, I don't why we should assume a computer is not conscious.

Dec-17-09  ughaibu: A computer is a tool, why would we suspect it of being any more conscious than a bicycle?
Dec-17-09  mysql: So, Capablanca was just out of focus (or whatever other excuses), when Alekhine defeated him?
Dec-17-09  whatthefat: <ughaibu: A computer is a tool, why would we suspect it of being any more conscious than a bicycle?>

Why shouldn't a bicycle be conscious?

Dec-17-09  Shams: I didn't realize the animate/inanimate distinction had become obsolete.
Dec-17-09  whatthefat: Well, if the behaviors of animate and inanimate objects are both dictated by the laws of physics then the distinction seems a bit arbitrary. Is a virus animate?
Dec-17-09  mysql: Does 'consciousness' mean that something should be self-aware?
Dec-17-09  ughaibu: I have no reason to suspect that a bicycle is conscious, neither do I have any reason to suspect that laws of physics are dictating what I'm presently writing.
Dec-17-09  acirce: <Simply put, I disagree with your post above, and for the reasons I have already posted. You say Capa was giving money odds. I say based on a witness' narration (Alekhine), that Capa was giving time odds.>

Well, it was money odds, and certainly Alekhine didn't say it was time odds. I remember <Calli> clearing this up for you once.

Dec-17-09  visayanbraindoctor: Look I know every chess player who has played blitz even just once (meaning every one) must find what Capa did unbelievable. My first reaction was: NO ONE BUT NO ONE CAN PLAY THAT FAST!

Yet I do know that Alekhine himself was one of the strongest players not only in classical and blindfold, but blitz as well. I have read a description by Edward Lasker of a teenage Alekhine demolishing every master around in quick games in between rounds of an international tournament. And given his somewhat egoistic personality, no way will this man mythify one of his competitors. It is simply unrealistic for an Alekhine to disbelieve a rival can win money with 5 to 1 odds. Especially in quick games, in chess clubs all over the world, this happens all the time. Alekhine would not even think twice if a rival won money in such a manner.

Any one can read Alekhine's narration. To him what Capablanca did was not only unbelievable, IT WAS UNIMAGINABLE! AAA was not capable of thinking that such a thing could even happen in the first place; and then it happened. Naturally he was flabbergasted.

It is not often that excellent blitz players would publicly admit that a rival is better than them. Yet look at Lasker and Fine talking about Capa's quick games prowess in a clearly flabbergasted manner themselves! Whatever Capablanca was doing, it must have looked inhumanly good to them; except that Capa of course was clearly a human being with a propensity for pretty women.

I am open-minded enough to think that Capa was indeed that good in quick games; and curious enough to want to explain it. If any kibitzer of course would close his mind to such a possibility, he will never be able to explain such a phenomenon; but I respect that.

However, there are others here like <maxi> who can accept that such thing can happen, and such a player can exist. The next step naturally would be driven by innate human curiosity. HOW THE H_LL DID CAPA MANAGE PLAY SO FAST?

According to <theagenbiteofinwit>, it could be superior cognition. And I would immediately say that he could be right. This is also the first thought that came to my mind. It could well be true of course.

Nowadays though, I lean toward the possibility that Capa was using additional areas of his brain, especially the ones related to speech, areas that are normally not used in chess-playing.

Can we think of experiments to test such a hypothesis? Yes. I have described one experiment above.

There are probably other ways. I do not know if this has been done, but why not do a PET scan of a sample of super GMs while they are playing chess (unfortunately easier said than done, imagine a chess master trying to play serious chess inside a PET scan room while lying down being scanned). The parts of his brain actively metabolizing while he is thinking chess should light up. If we do this to a large enough number of super GMs, we will eventually have a data base for what portions of the normal brain metabolize faster while playing chess. Then we expose millions of kids to chess at the age of 4, specifically by allowing them to watch their parents play, and also do regular PET scans on them. If the hypothesis above is right, a few of these kids would soon exhibit brain metabolism in areas NOT normally seen in the super GM database. See if some of these kids would end up learning chess just by watching their parents play. Choose them for training. We could end up with a very few (maybe even none) who get portions of their brains not normally used in chess permanently hard-wired into processing chess info.

I am not expecting that such an experiment will occur of course. It's clearly very impractical.

Dec-17-09  SatelliteDan: "Will I dream Dave?"
Dec-17-09  FHBradley: <mysql: Does 'consciousness' mean that something should be self-aware?> Or at least aware.
Dec-17-09  SetNoEscapeOn: Concerning the 5 minute to 1 minute discussion- it does appear as if that is what really happened.

"Never before and never since have a I seen- and I cannot even imagine," recalls Alekhine "such an amazing rapidity of chess thinking that Capablanca possessed in 1913-1914. <In blitz games he gave all the St. Petersburg players odds of five minutes to one- and he won.>"

- MGP Volume I, p 239

That is indeed incredible, when you consider that not only Alekhine, but also Rubenstein and Lasker played in that tournament...

Dec-17-09  SetNoEscapeOn: <Well, it was money odds, and certainly Alekhine didn't say it was time odds. I remember <Calli> clearing this up for you once.>

So, Kasparov's quote is incorrect?

Dec-17-09  acirce: <So, Kasparov's quote is incorrect?>

Yes. He added "minutes" out of nowhere. See http://books.google.se/books?id=ErJ... for Edward Winter's translation.

Dec-17-09  SetNoEscapeOn: Cool- thanks.

On one hand, I think it is surprising that Kasparov would do that, but I'm assuming it was just an honest mistake- an assumption, which clearly others are also making.

On the other, it makes perfect sense, since rapid transit was indeed the dominant form of speed chess at that time, as <The Focus> already said.

Dec-17-09  Whitehat1963: We'll never have a definitive answer, so why not just drop it? Without a definitive answer, we're going to believe what we want to believe.

Suffice to say that Capablanca was an exceptional player under shorter time controls. His speedy simultaneous exhibitions would lend further credence to the fact. Didn't he play much faster simuls than Alekhine? I think I've read that somewhere.

I wonder if there are any written records of some of his blitz/rapid transit/whatever games. We certainly have some of his simul games on here. It would be interesting to subject some of his quick games to Rybka-type analysis and see just how accurate the "flabbergasting quickness" of Capablanca really was. But would it tell us much?

Similarly, what of great play and accuracy in blindfold games? Does it mean much? How much better do elite players play when they have sight of the board? I've read that Ivanchuk frequently spends most of his time staring at the ceiling during games. Does this mean he doesn't need to see the board?

Dec-17-09  acirce: Maybe it wasn't even Winter's translation, or any translation, btw. <With this carefree approach to the public record, the book frequently creates its own confusion. Page 239, for instance, has Alekhine’s well-known tribute to Capablanca (from pages 105-106 of the April 1956 BCM, although that is naturally not specified) in which he wrote as follows regarding the Cuban’s prowess in 1914: ‘Enough to say that he gave all the St Petersburg masters the odds of 5-1 in quick games – and won!’ In Kasparov’s book the quotation comes in an alternative version: ‘In blitz games he gave all the St Petersburg players odds of five <minutes> [emphasis added here] to one – and he won’. Why? Since no source of any kind is given, it is impossible for the reader to know.> http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...
Dec-17-09  Whitehat1963: <acirce> but if Capablanca were so much better at quick games, why would the statement "and won!" even deserve an exclamation? If he knew he was much better, he could have easily (and safely) given monetary odds of 20 to 1. On the other hand, if Capablanca was confident but seeking a challenge or wanted perhaps to show off, giving himself less time would have been far more impressive, even with even-money odds. It makes more sense to me.

But who can say? Certainly it doesn't matter.

Dec-17-09  SetNoEscapeOn: <Whitehat1963: <acirce> but if Capablanca were so much better at quick games, why would the statement "and won!" even deserve an exclamation?>

Well, if he was talking about the time, then it would be odd to say "and won" with any punctuation. What does that mean? Won more games than he lost, won all the games, what?

If he was talking about money, it is less ambiguous; he simply won money- overall. But as you said, we really don't know.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 264)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 181 OF 264 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC