chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexander Alekhine
Alekhine 
George Grantham Bain Collection (Library of Congress)
 

Number of games in database: 2,230
Years covered: 1905 to 1946
Overall record: +862 -170 =432 (73.6%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 766 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (184) 
    C68 C62 C77 C78 C86
 Orthodox Defense (169) 
    D51 D63 D50 D67 D61
 French Defense (127) 
    C01 C11 C07 C13 C15
 Sicilian (109) 
    B20 B32 B40 B62 B30
 Queen's Pawn Game (109) 
    D02 D00 A46 A40 D05
 Queen's Gambit Declined (103) 
    D06 D30 D37 D31 D35
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (105) 
    C79 C78 C77 C68 C61
 Queen's Pawn Game (66) 
    D02 A46 A40 E10 A50
 French Defense (63) 
    C11 C01 C12 C00 C13
 Nimzo Indian (41) 
    E34 E33 E22 E21 E46
 French (36) 
    C11 C12 C13 C00 C10
 Sicilian (30) 
    B40 B20 B83 B30 B35
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Bogoljubov vs Alekhine, 1922 0-1
   Reti vs Alekhine, 1925 0-1
   Alekhine vs Lasker, 1934 1-0
   Alekhine vs A Nimzowitsch, 1930 1-0
   Alekhine vs Yates, 1922 1-0
   Gruenfeld vs Alekhine, 1923 0-1
   Alekhine vs Capablanca, 1927 1-0
   Alekhine vs M Vasic Miles, 1931 1-0
   Alekhine vs von Feldt, 1916 1-0
   Tarrasch vs Alekhine, 1922 0-1

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Capablanca - Alekhine World Championship Match (1927)
   Alekhine - Bogoljubov World Championship Match (1929)
   Alekhine - Bogoljubov World Championship Rematch (1934)
   Alekhine - Euwe World Championship Match (1935)
   Euwe - Alekhine World Championship Rematch (1937)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   19th DSB Congress, Mannheim (1914)
   Scheveningen (1913)
   All Russian Amateur (1909)
   Karlsbad (1923)
   Baden-Baden (1925)
   Zuerich (1934)
   Prague Olympiad (1931)
   San Remo (1930)
   Bled (1931)
   Bern (1932)
   Montevideo (1938)
   Semmering (1926)
   Bad Pistyan (1922)
   Hamburg Olympiad (1930)
   Karlsbad (1911)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Alex Alek Alex Alek Fredthebear Alex Alek Alex by fredthebear
   Alekhine's 300 games by 7krzem7
   300 Selected Games of Alekhine by Incremental
   Alekhine's 300 games by Malanjuk
   Match Alekhine! by amadeus
   Match Alekhine! by docjan
   Match Alekhine! by chessgain
   My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by daveyjones01
   book: My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by Baby Hawk
   My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by brucemubayiwa
   My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by SantGG
   My Best Games of Chess 1908-1937 by smarticecream
   My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by MSteen
   My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by doug27

GAMES ANNOTATED BY ALEKHINE: [what is this?]
   Capablanca vs Tartakower, 1924
   Reti vs Bogoljubov, 1924
   Botvinnik vs Vidmar, 1936
   Alekhine vs Botvinnik, 1936
   Botvinnik vs Tartakower, 1936
   >> 78 GAMES ANNOTATED BY ALEKHINE


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Alexander Alekhine
Search Google for Alexander Alekhine

ALEXANDER ALEKHINE
(born Oct-31-1892, died Mar-24-1946, 53 years old) Russia (federation/nationality France)
PRONUNCIATION:
[what is this?]

Alexander Alexandrovich Alekhine was the fourth World Champion, reigning from 1927 to 1935, and from 1937 until his death in 1946. He is the founding inspiration for the Soviet School of Chess that came to dominate world chess after World War II.

Background

Alekhine was born in Moscow, on 31 October 1892 (October 19th on the Russian calendar). Circa 1898, he was taught the game of chess by his older brother, Alexei Alexandrovich Alekhine (1888-1939). His life and chess career were highly eventful and controversial, spiced with two World Wars, including internments by the Germans and the Soviet Cheka (by whom he was marked for execution as a spy) at either end of WWI; subjection to suasion by, and suspicions of collaboration with, the Nazis in WWII; the deaths of his brother, Alexei, in 1939 and his sister, Varvara, in 1944; four marriages; five world championship matches; alcoholism; poor health during WWII and conspicuously failed World Championship negotiations with Capablanca. His eventful life and career terminated in strange circumstances in Portugal just hours after the details of the Alekhine-Botvinnik World Championship match were finalised.

Despite – or perhaps because of this - Alekhine played some of the finest games the world has ever seen. His meticulous preparation, work ethic and dynamic style of play provided the founding inspiration for the Soviet School of Chess despite the fact that soon after he won the world title, his anti-Bolshevik commentaries marked him as an enemy of the Soviet Union until after his death.

Tournaments

1900-1910 By 1902, at the age of 10, young Alekhine was playing correspondence chess sponsored by Shakhmatnoe Obozrenie, Russia's only chess magazine at the time, and won the 16th and 17th Shakhmatnoe Obozrenie Correspondence Chess Tournaments in 1906 and 1910. In 1908, his win at the Moscow Chess Club's Spring Tournament, at the age of fifteen was followed by winning the Autumn Tournament a few months later, a feat which earned him the right to play in the All-Russian Amateur Tournament in 1909. The youngest player in the tournament at the age of sixteen, he won the event held in St. Petersburg (+12 -2 =2), thereby earning the Russian Master title and becoming acknowledged as one of Russia’s top players. His prize was a cut glass Sevres vase that was donated by Czar Nicholas II, and which became his most prized and life-long possession. The year 1910 saw Alekhine win the Moscow Chess Club Autumn and Winter Tournaments, give his first simultaneous exhibition (+15 -1 =6) and participate in the master section of the 17th German Chess Congress in Hamburg, coming equal 7th with Fyodor Ivanovich Dus Chotimirsky. Upon graduating from Polivanov Grammar School in July 1910, he enrolled in and started studying law at Moscow's Imperial University, but after a few months he transferred to the St. Petersburg School of Jurisprudence (where he eventually graduated in 1914).

1911-1920 In 1911, his success at winning some events at the Moscow Chess Club earned him the right to play Board 1 for the Moscow Chess Club in a match against the St. Petersburg Chess Club, during which he drew his game with Eugene Aleksandrovich Znosko-Borovsky. Late in 1911, he played in the 2nd International Tournament in Carlsbad and placed equal 8th, behind Richard Teichmann, Akiba Rubinstein, Carl Schlechter, Georg Rotlewi, Frank Marshall, Aron Nimzowitsch, and Milan Vidmar. By 1912, Alekhine was the strongest chess player in the St. Petersburg Chess Society, winning the St. Petersburg Chess Club Winter Tournament in March and the 1st Category Tournament of the St. Petersburg Chess Club in April. His international successes began in 1912 when he won the 8th Nordic championship held in Stockholm with 8.5/10, 1.5 points clear of Erich Cohn, but then recorded his only minus score of his career later in 1912, when he won 7 and lost 8 games in the All Russian Masters Tournament in Vilna, placing equal 6th behind Rubinstein, Ossip Bernstein, Stefan Levitsky, Nimzovich, and Alexander Flamberg. In 1913, he tied for 1st with Grigory Levenfish in the St. Petersburg Masters Quadrangular Tournament, and then won the 40th Anniversary of the Nederlandschen Schaakbond Commemorative Tournament in Scheveningen with a score of 11.5 out of 13 ahead of a field that included David Janowski, Gyula Breyer, Fred Dewhirst Yates, Edward Lasker and Jacques Mieses. Alekhine's first major success in a Russian tournament came when placed equal first with Aron Nimzowitsch in the All-Russian Masters Tournament at St. Petersburg in early 1914; the playoff was drawn with one win each and they were declared co-winners enabling both to qualify for the 'tournament of champions' in St. Petersburg which was held a few months later. At St. Petersburg he placed 3rd behind Emanuel Lasker and Jose Raul Capablanca. This was the tournament at which Czar Nicholas II was reputed to have awarded the title of Grandmaster of Chess to the top five place getters: Lasker, Capablanca, Alekhine, Siegbert Tarrasch and Marshall. He graduated from the Emperor's College of Jurisprudence on May 16, 1914, finishing 9th in a graduating class of 46 and in July 1914, Alekhine tied for 1st with Marshall at the International Tournament in the Cafe Continental in Paris. (1)

A few weeks later, Alekhine was leading at Mannheim, Germany with nine wins, one draw and one loss, when World War I broke out and the tournament was stopped with six rounds left to play. However this did not prevent Alekhine from receiving the prize money for first place, some 1100 marks. After the declaration of war against Russia, Alekhine and other Russian players, including Efim Bogoljubov, were interned in Rastatt, Germany. After some drama, he was released several weeks later and made his way back to Russia, where he helped raise money to aid the Russian chess players who remained interned in Germany by giving simultaneous exhibitions. Soon after he won the Moscow Chess Club Championship in December 1915, his mother died after which he was posted to the Austrian front where he served in the Union of Cities (Red Cross) on as an attaché in charge of a mobile dressing station. In September, while hospitalised at the Cloisters military hospital at Tarnopol, he played five people in a blindfold display, winning all games. After leaving hospital, Alekhine returned to Moscow, where he was decorated for valour. In 1918, chess activity which had been briefly banned under the new Bolshevik regime picked up under Alexander Ilyin-Zhenevsky, the Chief Government Commissar for General Military Organization, who encouraged and organized chess activities in Russia as part of the campaign to promote culture and education in the Red Army. In 1918, Alekhine worked at the Moscow Criminal Investigation Department as an examining magistrate. In June 1919, while in Odessa, Alekhine was briefly imprisoned and marked for execution by the Cheka, as they suspected him of being a spy due to some documents that were left in his hotel room by a previous occupant. He was released, apparently because of an intercession of a Jewish chess player Yakov S Vilner, who was also the 1918 Odessa chess champion (see paragraph below concerning Alekhine’s purported anti-semitism). (2) A few months later in Moscow in January 1920, he made a clean score in the Moscow City Chess Championship with 11/11, and in October 1920, he won the first USSR Championship, his last tournament in Russia.

1921-30 Alekhine’s permanent departure from Russia in 1921 began a period of chess dominance matched only by Capablanca. Between leaving Russia in 1921 and winning the World Championship in 1927, Alekhine won or shared first prize in most of the tournaments in which he competed, including Budapest, L’Aia (in Italy), Triberg, and The Hague in 1921, Hastings and Karlsbad in 1922, the 16th British Chess Federation Congress at Portsmouth in 1923, Baden-Baden and the Five Masters Tournament in Paris in 1925, Hastings (1925-26), Birmingham, Scarborough and Buenos Aires in 1926, and Kecskemét 1927. Alekhine was 2nd or equal 2nd in the Breyer Memorial Tournament in Pistyan and at the 15th British Chess Federation Congress (known as the London victory tournament) in 1922, at Margate, Semmering, and the Dresden Chess Club 50th Year Jubilee Congress in 1926, and at New York in early 1927.

1931-38 Alekhine dominated chess for almost a decade after his title win. Tournament victories were at San Remo 1930 (+13 =2, 3½ points ahead of Nimzowitsch) and Bled 1931 (+15 =11, 5½ points ahead of Bogoljubov), London 1932, Swiss Championship in Berne in 1932, Pasadena 1932, Mexico City (=1st with Isaac Kashdan), Paris 1933, Rotterdam 1934, Swiss Championship in Zurich in 1934, and Orebro in 1935. In the eighteen months after losing the title to Max Euwe in 1935, Alekhine played in ten tournaments. His results were equal first with Paul Keres at Bad Nauheim in May 1936, first at Dresden in June 1936, second to Salomon Flohr at Poděbrady in July 1936, sixth behind Capablanca, Mikhail Botvinnik, Reuben Fine, Samuel Reshevsky, and Euwe at Nottingham in August 1936 (including his first game – which he lost - against Capablanca since the title match), third behind Euwe and Fine at Amsterdam in October 1936, equal first with Salo Landau at the Amsterdam Quadrangular, also in October 1936, first at the Hastings New Year tournament of 1936/37 ahead of Fine and Erich Eliskases, first at the Nice Quadrangular in March 1937, third behind Keres and Fine at Margate in April 1937; equal fourth with Keres, behind Flohr, Reshevsky and Vladimir Petrov, at Kemeri in June–July 1937 and equal second with Bogoljubow behind Euwe at the Bad Nauheim Quadrangular in July 1937. After regaining his title from Euwe, 1938 saw Alekhine win or come equal first at Montevideo, Margate, and Plymouth before placing =4th with Euwe and Samuel Reshevsky behind Paul Keres, Reuben Fine, and Mikhail Botvinnik, ahead of Capablanca and Flohr, at the historic might-have-been Candidates-style AVRO tournament in the Netherlands. The AVRO (meaning Algemene Verenigde Radio Omroep or General United Radio Broadcasting) tournament, the strongest tournament ever until that time, was held in Holland on November 2-27, with the top eight players in the world participating in a double-round affair. Alekhine finished ahead of Capablanca for the first time, defeating him in their second encounter. Flohr, the official FIDE-endorsed challenger to Alekhine in the next world championship match came in last place without a single win in 14 rounds.

1939-1946 Alekhine was playing first board for France in the 8th Chess Olympiad at Buenos Aires 1939 when World War II broke out in Europe and as team captain of the French team, he refused to allow his team to play Germany. Shortly after the 1939 Olympiad, Alekhine won all his games at the tournaments in Montevideo (7/7) and Caracas (10/10). Alekhine returned to Europe in January 1940 and after a short stay in Portugal, he enlisted in the French army as a sanitation officer. After the fall of France in June 1940, he fled to Marseille and tried to emigrate to America but his visa request was denied. He returned to France to protect his wife, Grace Alekhine, an American Jewess, whom the Nazis had refused an exit visa, and her French assets, a castle at Saint Aubin-le-Cauf, near Dieppe, but at the cost of agreeing to cooperate with the Nazis.

He played in no tournaments in 1940.

During World War II, Alekhine played in 16 tournaments, winning nine and sharing first place in four more. In 1941, he tied for second with Erik Lundin in the Munich 1941 chess tournament, won by Gosta Stoltz the reception at this event was attended by Josef Goebbels and Dr. Hans Frank. Also in 1941, he tied for first with Paul Felix Schmidt at Cracow/Warsaw, and won at Madrid. In 1942, Alekhine won at Salzburg, Munich, Warsaw/Lublin/Cracow and tied for 1st with Klaus Junge at Prague, the latter having been sponsored by Germany’s Nazi Youth Association; these tournaments were organised by Ehrhardt Post, the Chief Executive of the Nazi-controlled Grossdeutscher Schachbund ("Greater Germany Chess Federation") - Keres, Bogoljubov, Gösta Stoltz, and several other strong masters in Nazi-occupied Europe also played in such events. In 1943, he drew a mini-match (+1 -1) with Bogoljubov in Warsaw, won in Prague and was equal first with Keres in Salzburg. By 1943 Alekhine was spending all his time in Spain and Portugal as the German representative to chess events. In 1944, he won a match against Ramon Rey Ardid in Zaragoza (+1 -0 =3; April 1944) and later won at Gijon when prodigy Arturo Pomar Salamanca, aged thirteen, achieved a draw, the youngest person ever to do so with a world champion in a full tournament setting, a record that stands as of 2014. After the event, Alekhine took an interest in the development of Pomar and devoted a section of his last book to him. In 1945, he won at Madrid, tied for second place with Antonio Angel Medina Garcia at Gijón behind Antonio Rico Gonzalez, won at Sabadell, tied for first with Lopez Nunez in Almeria, won in Melilla and took second in Caceres behind Francisco Lupi. Alekhine's last match was with Lupi at Estoril, Portugal near Lisbon, in January 1946 which he won (+2 -1 =1).

In the autumn of 1945, Alekhine moved to Estoril. In September, the British Chess Federation sent Alekhine an invitation to tournaments in London and Hastings. Alekhine accepted the invitations by cable from Madrid. In October, the United States Chess Federation (USCF) protested the invitation of Alekhine to the victory tournament in London. The USCF refused to take part in any projects or tournaments involving Alekhine. Protesters included Reuben Fine and Arnold Denker. In November, Alekhine was in the Canary Islands giving chess exhibitions and giving lessons to Pomar. Also in November 1945, a telegram arrived, signed by W. Hatton-Ward of the Sunday Chronicle, the paper that was organizing the victory tournament in London that, due to a protest from the United States Chess Federation, the invitations to tournaments in England had been cancelled. Shortly after, Alekhine had a heart attack. In December, Alekhine played his last tournament, at Caceres, Spain.

On March 24, 1946, Alekhine was found dead in his hotel room, under circumstances that continue to arouse controversy. The official cause of death was choking to death, since a large piece of unchewed meat was found in his larynx. Alekhine was known to be in failing health, having been told the previous year by a Spanish doctor that he was suffering terminal cirrhosis of the liver.

World Championship

In November 1921, Alekhine challenged Jose Capablanca to a world championship match. A match was suggested for the United States in 1922, but neither this nor a candidate match between Alekhine and Rubinstein in March 1922 to determine a challenger took place. In August 1922, Alekhine played in the 15th British Chess Federation Congress (known as the London victory tournament). The participants of the tournament signed the so-called London agreement on August 9, 1922, which were the regulations for world championship matches, first proposed by Capablanca. Signatories included Alekhine, Capablanca, Bogoljubow, Geza Maroczy, Reti, Rubinstein, Savielly Tartakower and Vidmar. Clause one of the London Rules stated that the match to be one of six games up, drawn games not to count.

After Alekhine won a tournament at Buenos Aires in October 1926, he again challenged Capablanca. The Argentine government undertook to guarantee the finances of the match and in New York Capablanca, Alekhine, and the Argentine organizers finally reached an agreement about the world championship match. The winner would be the first person with six wins, draws not counting. Capablanca accepted the challenge and began the Capablanca - Alekhine World Championship Match (1927) in Buenos Aires on September 16, 1927. All but two of the games in Buenos Aires took place behind closed doors at the Argentine Chess Club, with no spectators or photographs. The other two took place at the Jockey Club but were moved to the Argentine Chess Club due to excessive noise. (3) Assisted by superior physical and theoretical preparations for the match – including a thorough study of Capablanca’s games - Alekhine became the 4th World Chess Champion after defeating Capablanca by +6 -3 =25 in the longest title match ever played till that time. The only longer title match since then was the Karpov - Kasparov World Championship Match (1984/85).

On July 29, 1929, Alekhine and Bogoljubow signed an agreement in Wiesbaden for a match. The rules differed from the London Rules (6 wins, draws not counting) with the number of maximum games limited to 30 games, but the winner still had to score at least 6 wins. The match was not played under the auspices of FIDE or the London Rules. He and Bogoljubow played the Alekhine - Bogoljubov World Championship Match (1929) at Wiesbaden (first 8 games), Heidelberg (3 games), Berlin (6 games), The Hague, and Amsterdam from September 6 through November 12, 1929. Alekhine won with 11 wins, 9 draws, and 5 losses. In April-June, 1934 Alekhine again played and defeated Bogoljubow in the Alekhine - Bogoljubov World Championship Rematch (1934) in Germany with the score of 8 wins, 15 draws and 3 losses. He then accepted a challenge from Max Euwe.

On October 3, 1935 the Alekhine - Euwe World Championship Match (1935) began in Zandvoort, with 10,000 guilders ($6,700) to go to the winner. On December 15, 1935 Euwe had won with 9 wins, 13 draws, and 8 losses. This was the first world championship match to officially have seconds to help in analysis during adjournments. Salo Landau, a Dutch Jew, was Alekhine's second and Geza Maroczy was Euwe's second. From October 5 to December 7, 1937, Alekhine played Euwe for the world championship match in various Dutch cities (The Hague, Rotterdam, Haarlem, Groningen, and Amsterdam). Alekhine won the Euwe - Alekhine World Championship Rematch (1937), becoming the first world champion to regain the world title in a return match, winning 10 games, drawing 11, and losing 4.

Unfinished Championship negotiations

There were two sets of unfinished negotiations that featured prominently during Alekhine’s reign: the long awaited rematch with Capablanca and the extended negotiations for a match with Botvinnik.

On December 12, 1927, in Buenos Aires after their match finished, Alekhine and Capablanca agreed to play a rematch within the next year, under the exact conditions as the first match. In 1929, after winning at Bradley Beach, New Jersey, Bradley Beach offered to host a Capablanca-Alekhine return match, but Alekhine refused and instead accepted the challenge from Efim Bogoljubow. Subsequently, Alekhine not only avoided a return match with Capablanca, but refused to play in any event that included the ex-champion. (4) Capablanca was not invited to San Remo 1930 and Bled 1931 for this reason, a situation which continued until the Nottingham tournament of 1936, after Alekhine had lost the title to Max Euwe. During this tournament, Capablanca defeated Alekhine in their individual encounter. Negotiations continued in various forms until 1940, but the rematch never occurred, despite four title matches being played in 1929, 1934, 1935 and 1937, generating bitter denunciations from Capablanca.

FIDE had tried exercising its limited power by short listing Flohr and Capablanca respectively to challenge Alekhine, but Alekhine declared that he would not be bound by FIDE’s plans. After the AVRO tournament of 1938, which had originally been intended by FIDE as a Candidate-style tournament to produce a challenger for the title, both Botvinnik and Keres issued Alekhine with challenges with Flohr's challenge probably lapsing because of his last placing at AVRO. All three negotiations were stalled or derailed by World War II. The Soviet annexation of Estonia forced Keres’ withdrawal from negotiations in favour of Botvinnik, while Capablanca died in 1942. In 1946 within hours of the Alekhine-Botvinnik match arrangements having been completed, and a venue (in Britain) for the match finally agreed to, Alekhine was found dead in Room 43 of the Estoril Hotel in Lisbon, Portugal under unsettling circumstances.

Simultaneous exhibitions

Alekhine once reminisced: "I was only 9-years old, just after the turn of the century, when I saw the great American Pillsbury play 22 boards blindfolded in Moscow.", an experience that left a deep impression on the budding chess player.

Alekhine played many simuls during the six years leading up to his world championship match in 1927, using them as fundraisers to meet the stiff conditions Capablanca had set for the challenge. He continued to play simuls, including blindfold and match simuls throughout the 1930s. In New York, on April 27, 1924, Alekhine broke the world record for simultaneous blindfold play when he took on 26 opponents, winning 16, losing 5, and drawing 5 after twelve hours of play. He broke his own record, in early 1925, by playing 28 games in Paris, winning 22, drawing 3, and losing 3. In the early 1930s, Alekhine travelled the world giving simultaneous exhibitions, including Hawaii, Tokyo, Manila, Singapore, Shanghai, Hong Kong, and the Dutch East Indies (now Indonesia) in what subsequently became known as Alekhine's Magical Mystery Tour. In 1932, Alekhine played against 300 opponents in Paris grouped in 60 teams of 5 players each, winning 37, losing 6, and drawing 17. In July 1933, Alekhine played 32 people blindfold simultaneously (again breaking his own world record) at the Century of Progress Exhibition in Chicago (World's Fair), winning 19, drawing 9, and losing 4 games in 14 hours.

Team play

Alekhine played first board for France in five Olympiads: Hamburg 1930 (+9-0=0 on their top board **), Prague 1931, Folkestone 1933, Warsaw 1935, and Buenos Aires 1939. He won the gold medal for first board in 1931 and 1933, and silver medals for first board in 1935 (Flohr winning gold) and 1939 (Capablanca winning gold). Although he didn’t win a medal in Hamburg because of insufficient games played, he won 9/9 and the brilliancy prize for the game Stahlberg vs Alekhine, 1930. His overall game score for the five Olympiads was +43 =27 -2.

Theory

Several openings and opening variations are named after Alekhine, including Alekhine's Defence. Alekhine is known for his fierce and imaginative attacking style, combined with great positional and endgame skill. He also composed some endgame studies. Alekhine wrote over twenty books on chess, mostly annotated editions of the games in a major match or tournament, plus collections of his best games between 1908 and 1937.

Personal

Alekhine was married four times, first to Russian baroness Anna von Sewergin in 1920 to legitimise their daughter Valentina, and divorced her some months later. Valentina died circa 1985 in Vienna. In 1921, he married Anneliese Ruegg, Swiss journalist, Red Cross nurse and Comintern delegate and they had a son in 1922, named after him. Young Alex Aljechin, as he came to be known, was under the guardianship of Erwin Voellmy for some years and in later years, he made regular appearances as a spectator in Dortmund until about 2005. Alekhine divorced Ruegg in 1924. In 1924, Alekhine met Nadezhda Semyenovna Fabritskaya Vasiliev, widow of the Russian General V. Vasiliev, and married her in 1925, divorcing her in 1934. In 1934, he married his fourth and final wife, Grace Wishaar, a wealthy US-born British citizen. Alexander and Grace Alekhine – for whom this was also her fourth marriage - remained married until he died.

His elder brother Alexei Alekhine was also a keen player.

Accusations of Anti-Semitism

Alekhine was accused of anti-Semitism following a series of articles that were published in 1941 within Nazi-occupied France in the Pariser Zeitung and in the Deutsche Schachzeitung under his by-line. In April 1941, he tried to go to America, via Lisbon, but was denied a visa apparently because of these articles. Controversy over whether they were a result of genuine collaboration, or whether he was forced to write these articles under Nazi coercion, or whether articles written by him were changed by Nazi editing for publication continues to this day. The evidence against him includes hand-written manuscripts of the articles that were allegedly found after his death, but their existence remains unsubstantiated. The evidence that he was not anti-semitic includes a lifetime of friendly dealings with Jewish chess players (including his second at the 1935 world championship, Salo Landau); friends, and possibly his fourth wife, Grace Alekhine, to whom he was married for 12 years until his death; and Yakov Vilner who interceded on his behalf to save him from execution by the Soviet Cheka in 1918. Grace defended her late husband, asserting that he refused privileges offered by the Nazis.

Testimonials

“He played gigantic conceptions, full of outrageous and unprecedented ideas. ... he had great imagination; he could see more deeply into a situation than any other player in chess history. ... It was in the most complicated positions that Alekhine found his grandest concepts.” - <Bobby Fischer>

“Alexander Alekhine is the first luminary among the others who are still having the greatest influence on me. I like his universality, his approach to the game, his chess ideas. I am sure that the future belongs to Alekhine chess.” - <Garry Kasparov>

"He is a poet who creates a work of art out of something which would hardly inspire another man to send home a picture postcard." - <Max Euwe>

"Firstly, self-knowledge; secondly, a firm comprehension of my opponent's strength and weakness; thirdly, a higher aim – ... artistic and scientific accomplishments which accord our chess equal rank with other arts." - <Alexander Alekhine>

Notes

Alekhine also played at least 40 recorded consultation chess games including the following partnerships: Alekhine / I. Turover, Alekhine / B Reilly, Alekhine / Trompowsky, Alekhine / G Esser, Alexander Alekhine / Leon Monosson, Alexander Alekhine / Efim Bogoljubov, Alekhine / W Cruz, Alekhine / O Cruz, Alekhine / Blumenfeld, Alekhine / Bernstein, Alekhine / Znosko-Borovsky, Alekhine / H Frank, Alekhine / V Rozanov, Alekhine / D N Pavlov, Alekhine / Nenarokov, Alekhine / Tselikov, Alekhine / Tereshchenk, Alekhine / O Zimmerman, Alekhine / Victor Kahn, A Alekhine / G Barron / E Hanger, Alekhine / J van den Bosch, [bad player ID, Alekhine / R Wahrburg, Alekhine / Dr. Fischer, Alekhine / J Budowsky, Alekhine / Allies, & Alekhine / Koltanowski Blindfold Team ].

Sources and References

(1) 1912-14 results: http://storiascacchi.altervista.org...; (2) Wikipedia article: Yakov Vilner; (3) There is correspondence between Alekhine and Capablanca that suggests that Alekhine was open to a rematch and actually accepted a challenge from Capablanca in 1930, but that it fell through because of difficulties on Capablanca's side: Max Euwe (kibitz #167). (4) Shaburov Yuri: Alexander Alekhine. The Undefeated Champion (Publisher: Moscow. 'The Voice', 1992 256pp)

- Kevin Spraggett ’s theory about Alekhine’s death: hhttp://www.spraggettonchess.com/par... and http://www.spraggettonchess.com/par...;

- 2006 Chessbase article about Alekhine's death: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...;

- two Russian articles that include commentary on Alekhine's death: <1>: http://www.gambiter.ru/chess/item/1... (Russian language) - Google translation is as follows: http://translate.google.com.au/tran... and <2> http://www.kastornoe.newmail.ru/ale... (Russian language) - Google translation as follows: http://translate.google.com.au/tran...;

- Bill Wall on Alekhine:http://billwall.phpwebhosting.com/a...;

- Playlist of 29 games analysed by <Kingscrusher>: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...

- Discussion about literature about Alekhine: http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... and a list of books about Alekhine http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Pablo Moran, Agonia de un Genio (ALEKHINE), 1977

Online biography of Alekhine by Jeremy Silman, in seven parts: https://www.chess.com/article/view/...

Wikipedia article: Alexander Alekhine , (**) Wikipedia article: World records in chess

Last updated: 2021-05-05 03:40:59

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 90; games 1-25 of 2,230  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. N Urusov vs Alekhine 0-1331905Shakhmatnoe Obozrenie Corr Tourney No. 16C33 King's Gambit Accepted
2. Alekhine vs R Geish-Ollisevich 1-022190516th Correspondence TournamentC39 King's Gambit Accepted
3. Alekhine vs A Gize ½-½41190516th Correspondence TournamentC33 King's Gambit Accepted
4. Alekhine vs A Andriyashev 1-0301905corrC38 King's Gambit Accepted
5. Alekhine vs N Urusov 1-0321905Shakhmatnoe Obozrenie Corr Tourney No. 16C25 Vienna
6. V Zhukovsky vs Alekhine 0-1201905corrC25 Vienna
7. Alekhine vs V Manko 1-0241905Shakhmatnoe Obozrenie theme 16th corrC25 Vienna
8. A Gize vs Alekhine 0-129190516th Correspondence TournamentC33 King's Gambit Accepted
9. V Manko vs Alekhine 1-0331905Shakhmatnoe Obozrenie theme 16th corrC52 Evans Gambit
10. Alekhine vs V Manko 1-0281906F Shakhovskoi corr tC45 Scotch Game
11. Alekhine vs N Zubakin 0-1331906corr 1906/07C33 King's Gambit Accepted
12. B Lyubimov vs Alekhine ½-½391906corr 1906/07C80 Ruy Lopez, Open
13. Viakhirev vs Alekhine 0-1361906corr 1906/07C28 Vienna Game
14. Alekhine vs A Romashkevich 1-0181906Earl tournC20 King's Pawn Game
15. V Manko vs Alekhine 1-0361906F Shakhovskoi corr tC52 Evans Gambit
16. Alekhine vs A Gize 1-0251906F Shakhovskoi corr /07C29 Vienna Gambit
17. Alekhine vs V Zhukovsky ½-½351906RUE corrC39 King's Gambit Accepted
18. Alekhine vs NN 1-0461907KislovodskD06 Queen's Gambit Declined
19. Budberg vs Alekhine 0-1341907Moscow Club SpringB00 Uncommon King's Pawn Opening
20. Alekhine vs V Rozanov 1-0421907MoscowC45 Scotch Game
21. Alekhine vs V Nenarokov 0-1431907Moscow Club AutumnD02 Queen's Pawn Game
22. Alekhine vs K I Isakov 1-0261907Moscow Club SpringC44 King's Pawn Game
23. Alekhine vs V Nenarokov 1-0101907MoscowD07 Queen's Gambit Declined, Chigorin Defense
24. Gajdukevich vs Alekhine 1-0321907KislovodskB20 Sicilian
25. Alekhine vs Gajdukevich 1-0201907KislovodskC35 King's Gambit Accepted, Cunningham
 page 1 of 90; games 1-25 of 2,230  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Alekhine wins | Alekhine loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 124 OF 145 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: Speaking of the alleged opening superiority of modern players, a number of critics of the Fischer - Spassky (1992) rematch accused them of being unable to play modern openings. Ljubomir Ljubojevic defended their play quality and replied that the modern players can't play the older openings so well. Now we see a tough player like Tomaschevsky being reduced to a resignable position on move 30 against Carlsen's London System -- Carlsen vs Tomashevsky, 2016
Jan-23-16  ughaibu: <Did clearance sacrifices in order to open up a diagonal for a bad bishop exist pre WW1?>

That was not my question.

<Did sacrifices associated with opening up the a1-h8 diagonal for the KID fianchettoed bishop exist pre WW1?>

Neither was that, and there is nothing in any of the Alekhine games linked to, that in any way resembles the sacrifices by Gligoric.

Gligoric was sacrificing pawns to create half-open files so that he could put his pieces on the resulting outposts. If, in Rubinstein vs Salwe, 1908, the position at move 12 had been arrived at by Rubinstein sacrificing by advancing a pawn from c5 to c6, and Salwe taking it with a pawn on b7, this would constitute an analogous case. Personally, I can't think of any example of a player, before WWII, sacrificing pawns to create half-open files to occupy with pieces, can you?

Jan-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: Here is another example illustrating Capablanca showing his superiority in <understanding types of positions> rather than <highly accurate play>. Faehndrich / Kaufmann vs Reti / Capablanca, 1914

Reti made it famous by annotating the key moment at great length to illustrate the difference between Capablanca and masters who came before him - which was in <understanding> and not in <accuracy>.

Jan-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: "I can't think of any example of a player, before WWII, sacrificing pawns to create half-open files to occupy with pieces, can you?"

I think the concept is too broad, the idea crops up in all the unexpected places. I often skipped through games of players who are more famous for their losses than their wins. (loads of undiscovered treasure in these games)

These guys were good players and have some good games on their C.V's.

Curt von Bardeleben, (and the London 1985 game v Steinitz comes right to mind.)

I would not place this as one of von Bardeleben's classics but I recalled going over this game years ago and it is an example of a pawn sac to occupy an outpost.

Von Bardeleben vs J Minckwitz, 1889


click for larger view

von Bardeleben sacked a pawn on c6 pulling the b-pawn to c6 and c5 was occupied by both Knights, a Rook and a Queen.

---

Back to Larsen, although he had the occasional pop at the old masters he did rate Nimzovitch very highly and credited him to his development as a chess player. See his contribution to 'Learn from the Grandmasters'.

Jan-23-16  ughaibu: That's a nice game, but still not much like Gligoric's sacrifices. Von Bardeleben's sacrifice is a standard way of creating a passed pawn and in the given position allows his bishop immediate entry into the black position.
Jan-23-16  visayanbraindoctor: <ughaibu: I can't think of any example of a player, before WWII, sacrificing pawns to create half-open files to occupy with pieces, can you?>

Of course I can. This is the best <create half-open files> game I have ever seen in all the games I have ever replayed.

Dus Chotimirsky vs Capablanca, 1925

Capablanca makes two pawn sacs, and creates half open b and c files for his pieces to occupy.

Capablanca seemed to 'known' about the value of half open files instinctively, and knew exactly how to play on them. The Benko Gambit makes thematic use of this idea. Pre WW1 Capablanca creates the first Benko type game below:

Nimzowitsch vs Capablanca, 1914

Jan-23-16  visayanbraindoctor: <Sally Simpson: Back to Larsen, although he had the occasional pop at the old masters he did rate Nimzovitch very highly and credited him to his development as a chess player>

That's good of Larsen.

Jan-23-16  visayanbraindoctor: <Jonathan Sarfati: <visayanbraindoctor>, thanks, I went to the Alekhine page to check it out. I continue to wonder if Watson and his followers have even played through many of the classics by the older greats.>

I agree with you. I can't believe any competent chess player can go through pre WW2 games and say the things Watson said. I suspect the same is true for Larsen (except for Nimzo, whose games he obviously has studied.) Foir instance, if Larsen had ever seen Reti's double rook sacs, I don't think he would ever have said that Reti was a weak tactician.

I suspect ignorance coupled with the narcissistic generation syndrome is the root cause of Larsen's and Watson's speculations, and why they are propagating at viral speeds among the newer chess generations. That's one reason why I always recommend to those who adhere to this viral meme to study pre WW2 games. Ignorance will make you sleep, but the truth will set you free (from this virus).

A while back ago, I decided to peruse through Alekhine's early games, just to see how he played before he became so famous. Many of these relatively unknown games were played with pretty strong Russian Empire masters who later became more well known as Soviet masters. I got a surprise. Alekhine was playing as brilliantly as he later did in his career.

For example Alekhine himself has done the double rook sac, twice! All before WW2.

Alekhine vs V Rozanov, 1908

(I made notes in this game some time ago.)

Alekhine vs Levenfish, 1912

(I also made notes on this game. AAA made a double rook sac against Levenfish, later on one of the USSR's strongest masters, a future two time Soviet Champion, and one of the strong masters who held Botvinnik to a tie in a match.)

In the context of the discussion above, I also found out that AAA, even before WW1, had already played almost every commonly played tactic in chess theory.

Jan-23-16  visayanbraindoctor: <Jonathan Sarfati: Speaking of the alleged opening superiority of modern players, a number of critics of the Fischer - Spassky (1992) rematch accused them of being unable to play modern openings. Ljubomir Ljubojevic defended their play quality and replied that the modern players can't play the older openings so well. Now we see a tough player like Tomaschevsky being reduced to a resignable position on move 30 against Carlsen's London System -- Carlsen vs Tomashevsky, 2016>

I have made this point several times already. Many of the top masters nowadays are playing what you call <unpretentious openings>. And openings already commonly used pre WW2. The trend is now being led by World Champion Carlsen. But it seem to me it actually started when Kramnik took up the Berlin in 2000 against Kasparov.

Nowadays, we see a lot of Berlins. AFAIK the number one World Champion practitioner of the Berlin before Kramnik came along was Lasker. But not many people seem to know this; many chess fans seem to think that Kramnik invented the Berlin. It was actually commonly played in the Lasker era.

If one takes up the paradigm that chess is <advancing>, it looks as if modern chess is actually <regressing>. Chess IMO is doing neither. It's just that certain ways of playing the opening is getting to be seen more frequently, and these change of frequencies occur in cycles. Who knows, a decade from now, KIDs will be back in full force.

Jan-23-16  visayanbraindoctor: <this type of exchange sac was something good and new in the post-Lasker era.>

I had a debate with a fellow kibitzer some years ago. He was insisting that true exchange sacs for positional play did not exist pre WW2.

Surprise! Not only did the positional exchange sac exist before WW2, there was one pre WW1 master who specialized in it, Janowski.

Game Collection: David Janowsky's exchange sacrifices

Most of these are true exchange sacs for positional assets as far as I can ascertain, with no clear short term material compensation.

A more complicated kind of 'exchange' sac is the one from the famous Capablanca vs Alekhine, 1936, although this occurred after WW1.

Jan-23-16  visayanbraindoctor: <I see GM's much more willing to "ruin" their pawn structure for some other type of compensation.>

I would suggest that you run through Alekhine's games in this page. He never did care for pawn structures or even material once he saw the opportunity to gain the initiative and attack, all of the pre WW1, pre WW2, and WW2 versions of him. I haven't looked at many master games from the Anderssen era, but from the few I have replayed they seemed to have the same attitude too. They went on the attack leaving pawns hanging all over the place. One day I shall look more closely at their games.

Alekhine himself says that his childhood idol was the great attacking Russian master and WC Challenger Chigorin. One day I shall look more closely at his games. I suspect I will see many of the same tactics there that modern players now play.

Jan-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <visayanbraindoctor> In their works on geometry, the ancient Greeks showed knowledge of limits and never-ending series. Does that mean calculus was nothing new in the 17th century? Yes, if Archimedes lived in the 17th century he would be able to keep up with these developments. BUT, he would have to study them.

Similarly, yes there were old masters playing exchange sacs and gambiting their kingsides, but they don't necessarily have the same motives as the examples I presented. For example, in which game does Janowski display a sound defensive scheme based on an exchange sac?

Jan-23-16  visayanbraindoctor: <beatgiant> I don't entirely subscribe to your analogizing the field of mathematics to chess in the context of our discussion. Why? Mathematics is a much larger field than chess. New specialties in it understandably kept on being discovered throughout the ages. Chess on the other hand is relatively quite limited. There are 32 pieces that can move variously on 64 squares, rigidly following a specific number of ways to move. I believe by Lasker's era, all practical recurring tactics had already been discovered. After perusing through a lot if pre WW1 games on this site AFAIK they already have been discovered. I see exactly the same types of tactics and combinations used by pre WW1 players and today's.

What you are saying is that Janowski did not make the same kind of exchange sacs as Petrosian? I think it's kind of nitpicking. One can always say that Petrosian did not make the same exchange sacs as Janowski.

I would agree if you say that Petrosian's sacs were more defensive in nature than Janowsi's. But I can always say that Janowki's sacs were more aggressive than Petrosian's. For example did Petrosian tend to make these kinds of exchange sacs?

Janowski vs Lasker, 1896

Pillsbury vs Janowski, 1904

I think it's just because Janowski was a more aggressive player then Petrosian. The fact is that both were making positional exchange sacs, and this I believe is the essence of our discussion.

If you want a concrete example of a pre WW1 'defensive' exchange sac, I already gave one above. The essentials of both the Petrosian and Capablanca (he was just 12 year old then, shows what a genius he was) exchange sacs are:

1. It results in a N vs R.

2. There are holes in the R side which the N side can exploit favorably with the Knight, on which the N can't be challenged by an opposing B or N (because they have been exchanged off with a R). This is usually can happen because the position retains a semi closed character just after the sac is made, in which the interlocked pawn structures allows for such holes.

BTW Janowski's exchange sacs did not always work. See below.

Capablanca vs Janowski, 1916

Let's analyze the essence of this sac. It's exactly the same as the above Petrosian and Capablanca games. There are holes in the R side which the N side can exploit favorably with the Knight, on which the N can't be challenged by an opposing B or N (because they have been exchanged off with a R). This is usually can happen because the position retains a semi closed character just after the sac is made, in which the interlocked pawn structures allows for such holes.

Why did Janowski fail and lose? Because Capablanca made his own exchange sac later on!

This game clearly shows that the general rule above <There are holes in the R side which the N side can exploit favorably with the Knight, on which the N can't be challenged by an opposing B or N (because they have been exchanged off with a R). This is usually can happen because the position retains a semi closed character just after the sac is made, in which the interlocked pawn structures allows for such holes.> is a sound rule that can form the basis of a sound exchange sac.

It was not only Petrosian who understood this rule. Capablanca and Janowski certainly did too.

Jan-23-16  ughaibu: Visayanbraindoctor: Again, neither of those Capablanca games has sacrifices even slightly resembling Gligoric's. You gave two cases of line-opening and one tactical sacrifice to exploit a pin.

If you haven't got an example, kindly stop wasting my time by posting non-examples.

I'm getting a vague recollection that you are always like this, incapable of admitting when you're mistaken and willing to go to the ends of the earth to preserve your delusion that you're not. So, you have exactly one remaining chance to post something that contributes to genuine dialogue.

Jan-23-16  ughaibu: <This is the same principle the Gligoric KID sac uses. The Benko Gambit uses the same principle>

You are a complete and incorrigible twit.

Jan-23-16  visayanbraindoctor: <ughaibu> In case you haven't noticed, Capablanca sacked his pawns and occupied the squares vacated by the pawns later on.

11... c4 and 12... Nc5

29... b3 and 31... Bb4

Apart from that he was able to use all the squares behind his sacked pawns for his other pieces, Queen, Rook, Knight, Bishop, immensely increasing their activity.

This is the same principle the Gligoric KID sac uses.

Kotov vs Gligoric, 1953

The Benko Gambit uses the same principle, although the black pieces generally occupy and use these squares later on and not immediately.

If you read my notes on this game, I regard this type of sac as a clearance sac in order to increase piece activity.

If you don't see the essential sameness or simply refuse to acknowledge it because it would mean that your notion that the Gligoric KID sac must demonstrate a new chess principle is not really true, that's your problem not mine. I think you are trying to be rude in your last post, but really, my time is probably more precious than yours, perhaps you should <kindly stop wasting my time> too.

Jan-23-16  ughaibu: <my time is probably more precious than yours>

I repeat, you are a complete and incorrigible twit.

Jan-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <visayanbraindoctor> <Janowski vs Petrosian> I agree you can either say that Janowski was different than Petrosian, or that Petrosian was different than Janowski. But, Janowski was of an earlier time, Petrosian was of a later time, and there was a difference. If so, that would tend to support the idea that something new was added, would it not? I seem to be missing something of your point here.

<Capablanca vs. Petrosian> Unlike the Reshevsky-Petrosian game, the Capablanca-Corzo game did not show an exchange sac as part of a sound defensive scheme. First, it was not sound - it left Corzo in a winning position. If you don't agree, go to that game page and post your rebuttal to the wins that have been posted there. Second, it was not defensive - it was part of a pawn race type situation.

Jan-24-16  visayanbraindoctor: <Sally Simpson: I would not place this as one of von Bardeleben's classics but I recalled going over this game years ago and it is an example of a pawn sac to occupy an outpost.>

I have always thought of these kind of sacs as clearance sacrifices. They open up the squares behind the sacked pawns, immensely increasing piece activity. The files behind the pawns become half open, and the diagonals and ranks behind the pawns are unblocked. The squares immediately occupied by the vacated pawn is usually taken up by another piece sooner or later, although that's not quite necessary. They are quite beautiful to see when they do occur.

My next favorite example after Capablanca's double pawn sac in

Dus Chotimirsky vs Capablanca, 1925

is found in

Kramnik vs Kasparov, 1994

28. c5!

Jan-24-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <visayanbraindoctor> <I believe by Lasker's era, all practical recurring tactics had already been discovered.>

As time goes on, more positions that were previously thought to be unsound are discovered to be playable. For example, Alekhine considered the "hedgehog" type formations to be unsound, as he commented in his notes to Alekhine vs V Mikenas, 1933 But nowadays, nobody would raise an eyebrow about a game like Topalov vs Carlsen, 2015

Jan-24-16  visayanbraindoctor: <beatgiant: If so, that would tend to support the idea that something new was added, would it not?>

Essentially no. Janowski, Capablanca, and Petrosian all were using the same chess principle, which I have elaborated on above, even placing it in brackets. (I wanted to be sure you did not miss it.)

If you are saying that Petrosian employed it more defensively than Janowski, then I think you are right. But then it was their personalities. As I said, Janowski was an aggressive player, and he owuld tend to use this principle aggressively. If Petrosian were Janowski and versa versa we would probably be seeing it the other way.

Jan-24-16  visayanbraindoctor: <beatgiant: <visayanbraindoctor> <I believe by Lasker's era, all practical recurring tactics had already been discovered.>

As time goes on, more positions that were previously thought to be unsound are discovered to be playable. For example, Alekhine considered the "hedgehog" type formations to be unsound>

You correct, I agree. The Hedgehog is the only exception AFAIK. Pre WW2 masters regarded is as unsound and it hardly ever occurred in that era.

I have said this several times BTW, in other posts.

Jan-24-16  ughaibu: Hedgehog: Blackburne vs Lasker, 1899 I don't think Alekhine's views coincided with Lasker's.
Jan-24-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <ughaibu>
Did you post the wrong link? The example above is not a hedgehog.
Jan-24-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: " For example, in which game does Janowski display a sound defensive scheme based on an exchange sac?"

A quick scan amongst Janowski draws found three. (just as a by the way Janowski is a vastly underrated player as are a lot of players who played in the era of the big three, Alekhine, Capablanca and Lasker...more about them later)

Janowski vs Tartakower, 1924

Tarrasch vs Janowski, 1911

Schlechter vs Janowski, 1902

I like the one v Tarrasch because Tarrasch was sitting comfortably and getting ready to play a smother game. If any player was upset by an unbalanced position it was Tarrasch (unless he did the unbalancing).

Note also two of these are unkibitzed, Vishy B. is furnishing well known games I'm sure you will find every modern idea has it's root in a game from the Steinitz era onwards and sometimes by a lesser appreciated player.

Not to mention the Cochrane games played in India in the 1850's. (if Morphy had not happened along then these games would have become more known and studied and the Hypermodern era would have kicked off in the 1860's. Morphy set chess back 60 years...a joke with food for thought.)

Much as I admire visayanbraindoctor's stance for sticking up for old masters and practically every strong player tells you to study their games else you will leave huge gaps in your development as a player.

I have say that todays players have it much tougher than in the golden olden days.

Then there were no databases where you could nick and improve on games played by non-GM's. Where players experimented or played a move off the beaten track just to escape the 'book' (which compared to todays opening knowledge is laughable).

It's not uncommon to see a stronger player nick a weaker players idea, which was often a loss, polish up and turn it into a weapon just for one game.

There are no adjournments today.

Also look how often top tournaments with the best players in the world come around these days.

You can get 5-6 a year where in the past you are getting 3-4 a decade, even less than that.

Ignoring World title matches, Alekhine only met Lasker 8 times, Capablanca 15 times and Capa played Lasker 10 times.

That is 33 games spread over 30 years.

Compare the current top three.

Carlsen has played Kramnik 23 times, Caruana 23 times and Kramnik has played Caruana 14 times.

That is 60 games in the last 10 years.
(the Kramnik and Carlsen v Caruana sequence of games started 5 years ago.)

You have to say today's players are better chess players but they are standing on the shoulders of the previous generations.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 145)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 124 OF 145 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC