chessgames.com

Lasker 
 
Emanuel Lasker
Number of games in database: 1,093
Years covered: 1889 to 1940
Overall record: +361 -91 =180 (71.4%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      461 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (175) 
    C68 C62 C66 C67 C64
 French Defense (78) 
    C11 C12 C13 C01 C14
 French (55) 
    C11 C12 C13 C00 C10
 King's Gambit Accepted (48) 
    C39 C33 C38 C37 C35
 Sicilian (48) 
    B45 B34 B40 B32 B58
 King's Gambit Declined (30) 
    C30 C31 C32
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (106) 
    C65 C66 C67 C79 C77
 Orthodox Defense (51) 
    D53 D63 D52 D50 D60
 Queen's Pawn Game (31) 
    D05 D02 D00 D04 A46
 Giuoco Piano (31) 
    C50 C53 C54
 Sicilian (28) 
    B34 B73 B33 B45 B32
 Four Knights (21) 
    C49 C47 C48
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Lasker vs J Bauer, 1889 1-0
   Lasker vs Capablanca, 1914 1-0
   Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1896 0-1
   Lasker vs W Napier, 1904 1-0
   Marshall vs Lasker, 1907 0-1
   Euwe vs Lasker, 1934 0-1
   Lasker vs Steinitz, 1894 1-0
   Lasker vs Schlechter, 1910 1-0
   Steinitz vs Lasker, 1896 0-1
   Tarrasch vs Lasker, 1908 0-1

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Lasker-Steinitz World Championship (1894)
   Lasker-Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896)
   Lasker-Marshall World Championship Match (1907)
   Lasker-Tarrasch World Championship Match (1908)
   Lasker-Schlechter World Championship Match (1910)
   Lasker-Janowski World Championship Match (1910)
   Lasker-Capablanca World Championship Match (1921)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Match Lasker! by amadeus
   The Lion King by chocobonbon
   Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher
   lasker best games by brager
   Selected Lasker by LaBourdonnaisdeux
   the informal Lasker by ughaibu
   All Hail Emanuel by iron maiden
   World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86
   Lasker vs the World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
   Lasker by vidra
   fav Lasker & Steinitz games by guoduke
   Match Steinitz! by amadeus
   4-Ruy Lopez by classicalwin2
   Emanuel Lasker's Best Games by KingG

GAMES ANNOTATED BY LASKER: [what is this?]
   Rubinstein vs Lasker, 1909
   Rubinstein vs Salwe, 1908
   Spielmann vs Rubinstein, 1909
   Tartakower vs Schlechter, 1909
   Rubinstein vs Mieses, 1909
   >> 81 GAMES ANNOTATED BY LASKER

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Emanuel Lasker
Search Google for Emanuel Lasker


EMANUEL LASKER
(born Dec-24-1868, died Jan-11-1941) Germany

[what is this?]
Emanuel Lasker was the second "official" World Chess Champion, reigning for a record 27 years after he defeated the first World Champion, Wilhelm Steinitz, in 1894.

Statistician Jeff Sonas of Chessmetrics writes, "if you look across players' entire careers, there is a significant amount of statistical evidence to support the claim that Emanuel Lasker was, in fact, the most dominant player of all time." By Sonas' reckoning, Lasker was the No. 1 player in the world for a total of 24.3 years between 1890 and 1926.

Background

He was born in what was then Berlinchen (literally "little Berlin") in Prussia, and which is now Barlinek in Poland. In 1880, he went to school in Berlin, where he lived with his older brother Berthold Lasker, who was studying medicine, and who taught him how to play chess. By Chessmetrics' analysis, Berthold was one of the world's top ten players in the early 1890s.

Tournaments

Soon after Lasker obtained his abitur in Landsberg an der Warthe, now a Polish town named Gorzow Wielkopolski, the teenager's first tournament success came when he won the Café Kaiserhof's annual Winter tournament 1888/89, winning all 20 games. Soon afterwards, he tied with Emil von Feyerfeil with 12/15 (+11 -2 =2) at the second division tournament of the sixth DSB Congress in Breslau, defeating von Feyerfeil in the one game play-off.* Also in 1889, he came second with 6/8 (+5 -1 =2) behind Amos Burn at the Amsterdam "A" (stronger) tournament, ahead of James Mason and Isidor Gunsberg, two of the strongest players of that time. In 1890 he finished third in Graz behind Gyula Makovetz and Johann Hermann Bauer, then shared first prize with his brother Berthold in a tournament in Berlin. In spring 1892, he won two tournaments in London, the second and stronger of these without losing a game. At New York 1893, he won all thirteen games, one of a small number of significant tournaments in history in which a player achieved a perfect score.

After Lasker won the title, he answered his critics who considered that the title match was by an unproven player against an aging champion by being on the leader board in every tournament before World War I, including wins at St Petersburg in 1895-96, Nurenberg 1896, London 1899, Paris 1900 ahead of Harry Nelson Pillsbury (by 2 points with a score of +14 −1 =1), Trenton Falls 1906, and St Petersburg in 1914. He also came 3rd at Hastings 1895 (this relatively poor result possibly occurring during convalescence after nearly dying from typhus), 2nd at Cambridge Springs in 1904, and =1st at the Chigorin Memorial tournament in St Petersburg in 1909. In 1918, a few months after the war, Lasker won a quadrangular tournament in Berlin against Akiba Rubinstein, Carl Schlechter and Siegbert Tarrasch.

After he lost the title in 1921, Lasker was still in the top rank of players, winning at Moravská Ostrava in 1923 ahead of Richard Reti, Ernst Gruenfeld, Alexey Sergeevich Selezniev, Savielly Tartakower, and Max Euwe. His last tournament win was at New York 1924, where he scored 80% and finished 1.5 points ahead of Jose Raul Capablanca, followed by Alexander Alekhine and Frank James Marshall. In 1925, he came 2nd at Moscow behind Efim Bogoljubov and ahead of Capablanca, Marshall, Tartakower, and Carlos Torre Repetto. There followed a long hiatus from chess caused by his intention to retire from the game, but he re-emerged into front line chess in 1934 placing 5th in Zurich behind Alekhine, Euwe, Salomon Flohr and Bogoljubow and ahead of Ossip Bernstein, Aron Nimzowitsch, and Gideon Stahlberg. In Moscow in 1935, he was 3rd, undefeated, a half point behind Mikhail Botvinnik and Flohr and ahead of Capablanca, Rudolf Spielmann, Ilia Abramovich Kan, Grigory Levenfish, Andre Lilienthal, and Viacheslav Ragozin. Reuben Fine hailed the 66-year-old Lasker's performance as "a biological miracle". In 1936, Lasker placed 6th in Moscow and finished his career later that year at Nottingham when he came =7th with 8.5/14 (+6 -3 =5), his last-round game being the following stylish win: Lasker vs C H Alexander, 1936.

Matches

Non-title matches 1889 saw his long career in match play commence, one which only ceased upon relinquishing his title in 1921. He won nearly of his matches, apart from a few drawn mini-matches, including a drawn one-game play-off match against his brother Berthold in Berlin in 1890, losing only exhibition matches with Mikhail Chigorin, Carl Schlechter and Marshall, and a knight-odds match against Nellie Showalter, Jackson Showalter's wife. In 1889, he defeated Curt von Bardeleben (+1 =2) and in 1889-90 he beat Jacques Mieses (+5 =3). In 1890, he defeated Henry Edward Bird (+7 -2 =3) and N Miniati (+3 =2 -0), and in 1891 he beat Francis Joseph Lee (+1 =1) and Berthold Englisch (+2 =3). 1892 and 1893 saw Lasker getting into his stride into the lead up to his title match with Steinitz, beating Bird a second time (5-0), Joseph Henry Blackburne (+6 =4), Jackson Whipps Showalter (+6 -2 =2) and Celso Golmayo Zupide (+2 =1). In 1892, Lasker toured and played a series of mini-matches against leading players in the Manhattan, Brooklyn and Franklin Chess Clubs. At the Manhattan Chess Club, he played a series of three-game matches, defeating James Moore Hanham, Gustave Simonson, David Graham Baird, Charles B Isaacson, Albert Hodges, Eugene Delmar, John S Ryan and John Washington Baird; of the 24 games he played against these players he won 21, losing one to Hodges and drawing one each with Simonson and Delmar. At the Brooklyn Chess Club, Lasker played two mini-matches of two games each, winning each game against Abel Edward Blackmar and William M De Visser, and drew the first game of an unfinished match against Philip Richardson. Lasker finished 1892 at the Franklin Chess Club by playing 5 mini-matches of two games each against its leading players, winning every game against Dion M Martinez, Alfred K Robinson, Gustavus Charles Reichhelm and Hermann G Voigt and drawing a match (+1 -1) with Walter Penn Shipley. Shipley offered cash bonuses if he could stipulate the openings and taking up the challenge, Lasker played the Two Knight's Defense and won in 38 moves, while in the second game, Shipley won as Black in 24 moves against Lasker playing the White end of a Vienna Gambit, Steinitz variation (Opening Explorer). Shipley, who counted both Lasker and Steinitz as his friends, was instrumental in arranging the Philadelphia leg of the Lasker-Steinitz match, that being games 9, 10 and 11. 29 years later, Shipley was also the referee of Lasker’s title match with Capablanca. In 1892-3, Lasker also played and won some other matches against lesser players including Andres Clemente Vasquez (3-0), A Ponce (first name Albert) (2-0) and Alfred K Ettlinger (5-0). Also in 1893, Mrs. Nellie Showalter, wife of Jackson Showalter and one of the leading women players in the USA, defeated Lasker 5-2 in a match receiving Knight odds.

These matches pushed Lasker to the forefront of chess, and after being peremptorily refused a match by Tarrasch, he defeated Steinitz for the world title in 1894 after spreadeagling the field at New York 1893. While he was World Champion, Lasker played some non-title matches, the earliest of which was a six-game exhibition match against Chigorin in 1903 which he lost 2.5-3.5 (+1 -2 =3); the match was intended as a rigorous test of the Rice Gambit, which was the stipulated opening in each game. In the midst of his four title defenses that were held between 1907 and 1910, Lasker played and won what appears to have been a short training match against Abraham Speijer (+2 =1) in 1908. Also in 1908, he played another Rice Gambit-testing match, this time against Schlechter, again losing, this time by 1-4 (+0 =2 -3), apparently prompting a rethink of the Rice Gambit as a viable weapon.** In 1909 he drew a short match (2 wins 2 losses) against David Janowski and several months later they played a longer match that Lasker easily won (7 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss). Lasker accepted a return match and they played a title match in 1910 (details below). In 1914, he drew a 2 game exhibition match against Bernstein (+1 -1) and in 1916, he defeated Tarrasch in another, clearly non-title, match by 5.5-0.5. After Lasker lost his title in 1921, he is not known to have played another match until he lost a two-game exhibition match (=1 -1) against Marshall in 1940, a few months before he died. A match between Dr. Lasker and Dr. Vidmar had been planned for 1925, but it did not eventuate.***

World Championship matches The Lasker-Steinitz World Championship (1894) was played in New York, Philadelphia, and Montreal. Lasker won with 10 wins, 5 losses and 4 draws. Lasker also won the Lasker-Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896), played in Moscow, with 10 wins, 2 losses, and 5 draws. At one stage when Rudolf Rezso Charousek ‘s star was in the ascendant, Lasker was convinced he would eventually play a title match with the Hungarian master; unfortunately, Charousek died from tuberculosis in 1900, aged 26, before this could happen. As it turned out, he did not play another World Championship for 11 years until the Lasker-Marshall World Championship Match (1907), which was played in New York, Philadelphia, Washington, Baltimore, Chicago, Memphis. Lasker won this easily, remaining undefeated with 8 wins and 7 draws.

After a prolonged period of frosty relations due to Tarrasch’s peremptory dismissal of Lasker’s offer for a match, Lasker accepted Tarrasch’s challenge for the title, and the Lasker-Tarrasch World Championship Match (1908) was played in Düsseldorf and Munich, with Lasker winning with 8 wins 3 losses and five draws. In 1910, Lasker came close to losing his title when he was trailing by a full point at the tenth and last game of the Lasker-Schlechter World Championship Match (1910) (the match being played in Vienna and Berlin); Schlechter held the advantage and could have drawn the game with ease on several occasions, however, he pursued a win, ultimately blundering a Queen endgame to relinquish his match lead and allow Lasker to retain the title. Some months later, the Lasker-Janowski World Championship Match (1910) - played in Berlin - was Lasker’s final successful defense of his title, winning with 8 wins and 3 draws.

In 1912 Lasker and Rubinstein, agreed to play a World Championship match in the fall of 1914 but the match was cancelled when World War I broke out. The war delayed all further title match negotiations until Lasker finally relinquished his title upon resigning from the Lasker-Capablanca World Championship Match (1921) in Havana while trailing by four games.

Life, legacy and testimonials

Lasker’s extended absences from chess were due to his pursuit of other activities, including mathematics and philosophy. He spent the last years of the 19th century writing his doctorate. Between 1902 and 1907, he played only at Cambridge Springs, using his time in the US. It was during this period that he introduced the notion of a primary ideal, which corresponds to an irreducible variety and plays a role similar to prime powers in the prime decomposition of an integer. He proved the primary decomposition theorem for an ideal of a polynomial ring in terms of primary ideals in a paper Zur Theorie der Moduln und Ideale published in volume 60 of Mathematische Annalen in 1905. A commutative ring R is now called a 'Lasker ring' if every ideal of R can be represented as an intersection of a finite number of primary ideals. Lasker's results on the decomposition of ideals into primary ideals was the foundation on which Emmy Noether built an abstract theory which developed ring theory into a major mathematical topic and provided the foundations of modern algebraic geometry. Noether's Idealtheorie in Ringbereichen (1921) was of fundamental importance in the development of modern algebra, generalising Lasker's results by giving the decomposition of ideals into intersections of primary ideals in any commutative ring with ascending chain condition.****

After Lasker lost his title, he spent a considerable amount of time playing bridge and intended to retire. However, he returned to chess in the mid-thirties as he needed to raise money after the Nazis had confiscated his properties and life savings. After the tournament in Moscow in 1936, the Laskers were encouraged to stay on and Emanuel accepted an invitation to become a member of the Moscow Academy of Science to pursue his mathematical studies, with both he and his wife, Martha, taking up permanent residence in Moscow. At this time, he also renounced his German citizenship and took on Soviet citizenship. Although Stalin's purges prompted the Laskers to migrate to the USA in 1937, it is unclear whether they ever renounced their Soviet citizenship.

Lasker counted Albert Einstein amongst his friends. He published several chess books but as he was also a mathematician, games theorist, philosopher and even playwright, he published books in all these fields, except for the play which was performed on one occasion. As a youth, his parents had recognised his potential and sent him to study in Berlin where he also learned to play serious chess. After he graduated from high school, he studied mathematics and philosophy at the universities in Berlin, Göttingen and Heidelberg. Lasker died in the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York in 1941, aged 72, and was buried in the Beth Olom Cemetery in Queens. He was survived by his wife and his sister, Lotta. On May 6, 2008, Dr. Lasker was among the first 40 German sportsmen to be elected into the "Hall of Fame des Deutschen Sports".

******

"It is not possible to learn much from him. One can only stand and wonder." - <Max Euwe> Euwe lost all three of his games against Lasker, the most lopsided result between any two world champions.

"My chess hero" - <Viktor Korchnoi>

"The greatest of the champions was, of course, Emanuel Lasker" - <Mikhail Tal>

"Lies and hypocrisy do not survive for long on the chessboard. The creative combination lies bare the presumption of a lie, while the merciless fact, culminating in a checkmate, contradicts the hypocrite." – <Emanuel Lasker>

*******

* E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker, 1889** http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... *** User: Karpova: Emanuel Lasker ****http://www.gap-system.org/~history/...

Sources: Article about Lasker by J J O'Connor and E F Robertson http://www.gap-system.org/~history/...; Obituary from the Times of London: http://www.gap-system.org/~history/...

Notes Lasker played on the following consultation chess teams Em. Lasker / MacDonnell, Lasker / Taubenhaus, Em. Lasker / Maroczy, Em. Lasker / I Rice, Em. Lasker / Barasz / Breyer, Lasker / Pillsbury, Lasker/Chigorin/Marshall/Teichmann, W Lasker Em / Ward Higgins, Emanuel Lasker / Heinrich Wolf, H Lasker Em / Keidanski & L Lasker Em / Lasek.

Wikipedia article: Emanuel Lasker
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...


 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,093  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Von Bardeleben vs Lasker  ½-½27 1889 Berlin m 8990D53 Queen's Gambit Declined
2. R Leather vs Lasker 0-156 1889 AmsterdamA07 King's Indian Attack
3. Gunsberg vs Lasker 0-135 1889 AmsterdamC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
4. E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker  1-042 1889 Breslau HauptturnierC30 King's Gambit Declined
5. Lasker vs Lipke 1-047 1889 Breslau (Poland)C26 Vienna
6. Lasker vs J Mason ½-½38 1889 AmsterdamC47 Four Knights
7. V Tietz vs Lasker 0-140 1889 German Chess Congress, Hauptturnier AC79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred
8. L Van Vliet vs Lasker 1-024 1889 AmsterdamC41 Philidor Defense
9. A Reif vs Lasker  0-113 1889 Breslau HauptturnierA02 Bird's Opening
10. Lasker vs Mieses 1-037 1889 MatchA84 Dutch
11. Lasker vs A Van Foreest 1-050 1889 AmsterdamA04 Reti Opening
12. Loman vs Lasker 0-122 1889 AmsterdamC79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred
13. Lasker vs J Bauer 1-038 1889 AmsterdamA03 Bird's Opening
14. Von Bardeleben vs Lasker 1-050 1889 BerlinC26 Vienna
15. L Mabillis vs Lasker  0-124 1889 Breslau HauptturnierC60 Ruy Lopez
16. Mieses vs Lasker 0-128 1889 Berlin (Germany)C25 Vienna
17. Lasker vs Von Popiel 0-121 1889 Berlin gameC26 Vienna
18. Lasker vs Von Bardeleben 1-047 1889 Berlin m 8990B06 Robatsch
19. E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker 0-147 1889 Hauptturnier play offD00 Queen's Pawn Game
20. Lasker vs Burn ½-½15 1889 AmsterdamC01 French, Exchange
21. Mieses vs Lasker ½-½60 1889 MatchC25 Vienna
22. Bird vs Lasker 0-149 1890 Lasker - BirdA03 Bird's Opening
23. Lasker vs Bird 0-156 1890 Lasker - BirdA81 Dutch
24. Lasker vs Mieses ½-½70 1890 MatchD21 Queen's Gambit Accepted
25. Bird vs Lasker 0-129 1890 Lasker - BirdA03 Bird's Opening
 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,093  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Lasker wins | Lasker loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 70 OF 70 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Sheer provocation, <IndigoViolet>. I have no idea why -1 X -1 equals 1 myself.
Feb-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Sounds rather like Socrates' session with the slave in "Meno":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meno#D...

Personally, I know why -1 x -1 equals one. Because my eighth grade algebra teacher said so. Funny guy with a mustache and some lousy cigars who could never remember my name.

Feb-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <PhonyBenoni> Fascinating, I did not know that dialog, or Socrates' geometrical demonstration.
Feb-08-13  voyager39: Regret I am not able to contribute much but its certainly nice exploring those threads and reading more.
Feb-11-13  shallowred: If you scroll up to the Chessgames Biography for Lasker and click on the last web link (the one for chessbase.com) you will find the article that states:

"Emanuel Lasker spent the most years at # 1."

What more can anyone do?

Feb-27-13  thomastonk: Quote of the Day: "A game played by men of equal strength, if played accurately, will end in a draw, and it is apt to be dull." ~Em. Lasker

Hmm, the first half isn't too surprising, once we see how much assumptions the mathematican made ("equal strength" and even the almost impossible "played accurately"), but the second half is refuted by chess history, isn't it?

Feb-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<ughaibu> As a matter of interest, how many world championship matches have had fewer that 20% decisive games?>

Three out of 44 = 7%, counting the PCA world championship matches:

1. Karpov-Kasparov World Championship Match (1984). +5-3=40 = 17%

2. Kasparov-Kramnik World Championship Match (2000). +2-0=13 = 13%

3. Anand-Gelfand World Chess Championship (2012). +2-1=13 = 19% (includes the rapid games)

And Lasker-Schlechter World Championship Match (1910). +1-1=8 = 20%

Mar-01-13  Damianx: King Radio not if u listen to Karpov he said Fischer was gutted they didn,t play and that Fischer was sure they would give in plus all good judges around at the time said Fischer was at least 100 points better than Karpov and that Karpov was nowhere near ready 4 Fischer maybe the following World tittle match
Mar-02-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <King Radio not if u listen to Karpov he said Fischer was gutted they didn,t play >

Gutted, like when you clean Fisch? I don't get it.

Mar-13-13  IndigoViolet: <The best known of these is too familiar to be repeated here: Culbertson’s account of Emanuel Lasker’s application to him for a teaching certificate for bridge. It appeared on pages 552-553 of the book and has been reproduced a number of times (e.g. by D.J. Morgan on page 460 of the October 1975 BCM).>

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Typical Winter; he writes as if everyone has - or should have - access to an extensive chess library.

Mar-30-13  IndigoViolet: D.J. Morgan on page 460 of the October 1975 <BCM>:

<One could readily make a list of grand old players of other days who died in sheer poverty. Let the great ones of today get all the money which their gifts and dedication entitle them to. Relevant is this note from 'The Strange Lives of One Man', the autobiography of Bridge expert Ely Culbertson. It was after his team had defeated an English team in London in 1932.

<There was one other result, and it made me feel sad. Dr Emanuel Lasker, who for so many years was chess champion of the world, came to see me. I was delighted to meet a man I had greatly admired since my youth. He had come from Berlin as a special correspondent to report the match for several Dutch and German papers....

Lately, things had been going pretty badly for him and if it hadn't been for bridge they would have been much worse.

'Mr Culbertson,' he said, 'I'd like to be your representative in Germany, and teach bridge. I understand that you issue certificates to teachers after proper examination. I'd like to take the examination with you privately.'

'Why, Doctor!, who am I to give you an examination? It's for you to give me an examination. And I would be honoured, I assure you.'

'I am very serious, Mr Culbertson. Your certificate would help me to get pupils. You already have a big name in Germany.' And he looked at me with a childlike envy.

I thought of his years of brilliant service to hundreds of thousands of chess players; and of the noble game itself that had fascinated the best minds for centuries, in which there were but few equal to Dr Lasker. I thought of the rewards in chess and in bridge and somehow felt ashamed.

As I was silent I heard his voice repeating timidly: 'Will you give me an examination, Mr Culbertson? Please.'

I gave him an honorary certificate.>>

I think, as with all memoirs, one should take this account with a pinch of salt, but it certainly fits with the idea that Lasker's return to chess in 1934 (having spent 9 years avoiding Alekhine) was motivated by financial difficulties.

Mar-30-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <IndigoViolet: ... it certainly fits with the idea that Lasker's return to chess in 1934 (having spent 9 years avoiding Alekhine) was motivated by financial difficulties.>

Why on earth would Lasker avoid Alekhine? Lasker didn't play between Moscow 1925 and Zurich 1934 as I recall, but that was hardly because he feared Alekhine. http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Mar-30-13  IndigoViolet: I believe that Lasker saw the writing on the wall at Moscow in 1925. Trailing the mighty Bogo by 1.5 points was bad enough, but he could see the younger generation of Soviets in the rear-view mirror. But most of all he feared the fury of Alekhine who he knew was maniacally bent on revenge and world domination. Least of all would he submit to becoming his whipping boy.
Mar-30-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR> Lasker did no such thing, of course-this, um, poster is bound and determined to maunder on, regarding his obvious dislike of Lasker.

As to the historical record, you know the facts at least as well as I, and there is little use posting these for someone who will again tell us how Lasker was a racist, etc.

Apr-09-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Here is a link, originally provided by <tamar> elsewhere, in which Capablanca is interviewed and discusses, inter alia, Lasker's profound judgment, one of the attributes which enabled him to play top-class chess well into his sixties:

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Apr-11-13  IndigoViolet: From <C.N. 3272> (Attempts to strip Lasker):

<Apart from the <Capablanca-Magazine> case (which was based on the failure of the Lasker-Capablanca championship match negotiations) the motivation seems to have been political, i.e. related to Lasker's pro-German writings about the Great War. Already in 1914 the British press reacted fiercely to Lasker's words. For example, page 65 of the December 1914 <Chess Amateur> quoted from the <Illustrated London News>:

<A certain Herr Lasker has been airing his views to the Berlin public on the British Navy, apparently because he believes himself worthy to be styled the chess champion. The only claim we know this individual has to the title arises from the fact that the last time he ventured to defend it he escaped defeat by a lucky fluke that gave him a draw. Since then there has been the same difficulty in getting him to fight as Sir J. Jellicoe has experienced with the German Fleet. Otherwise his remarks have about the same value as would those of a beetle concerning a steam roller.>

The <Chess Amateur> then commented:

<According to Herr Lasker the movements of the French Army are similar to those of a chess knight. His comments on the final results of the war would do credit to the intelligence and profound judgement of a well-trained parrot.>

Lasker's articles were published in the <Vossiche Zeitung> from 16 August to 25 October 1914. A French translation appeared in supplements to <La Strategie> in January, February and April 1915. For an English version see the feature on pages 104-114 of issue 3 of <Lasker & His Contemporaries>.>

Apr-14-13  IndigoViolet: From <C.N. 2470>:

<Tailpiece: the <Morning Post> (London) unilaterally stripped Lasker of his world title after the Great War:

<Senor Capablanca's victories were in many cases charming pieces of master-chess and it is clear that the world's title - formerly held by Emanuel Lasker - whose gratuitous insults to the Allies will keep him out of chess in civilized countries for the rest of his career - is in worthy hands.>

This was quoted (disapprovingly) by the <American Chess Bulletin> on page 231 of its September-October 1919 issue.>

The lack of source data given for the <Morning Post> quote strongly suggests that Winter relied solely on the <American Chess Bulletin> for it.

The <Post> appears to have been a rather colourful title:

<The paper invited the ire of all the anti-colonialists in 1919 when it organised a collection for a purse of £18,000 to be presented to Reginald Dyer, the general of the Amritsar massacre for his services to the British Empire on his return to Britain.

The Cause of World Unrest

The paper gained notoriety in 1920 when it ran a series of 17 or 18 articles based on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, text previously published in Russian by Sergei Nilus as the last chapter, Chapter XII, of Velikoe v malom... (The Great in the Small: The Coming of the Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth). It is still widely held that Victor E. Marsden, the paper's Russian desk correspondent, used the copy of this rare book retained by the British Museum to translate this last chapter for the paper. Some have questioned this because the anonymous 1923 publication crediting Marsden as the translator in the pamphlet's preface occurred three years after Marsden's death on October 28, 1920.

These articles were subsequently collected and formed the basis of the book, The Cause of World Unrest, to which half the paper's staff contributed, mainly George Shanks; also Nesta H. Webster. But main credit for the compilation was given to the paper's editor, Gwynne. The book further denounced international Jewry and cultural and social dissolution among the Christian Nations.>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mo...

It may be noteworthy that Lasker didn't play again in Britain until Nottingham, 1936. It would be interesting to know whether an attempt was made to invite him to the major London tournament of 1922.

Apr-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <It may be noteworthy that Lasker didn't play again in Britain until Nottingham, 1936.>

True, except for three simultaneous exhibitions in 1934.

Apr-15-13  IndigoViolet: Well, they say beggars can't be choosers. I suppose they took place in or around this game: Scott / Hunnam / Bardsley vs Lasker, 1934.
Apr-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Ealing: November 3 (No details of results)

Newcastle upon Tyne: December 3 (+23=1-2)

Newcastle Clock Exhibition: December 5 (+7=0-1)

No games from these exhibitions seem to have survived.

In the game you quote, Lasker's partner was G.H. Beaty. It took place on December 9.

Apr-15-13  Method B: It's from the Capablanca interview perfidious linked above:

<on a particular occasion he slipped into an inferior position to which Tarrasch induced him and suddenly found himself at his rival’s mercy. It was then that Lasker showed his fighting spirit. Instead of making the ordinary move which would have occurred to any other master, whereby he would sooner or later have lost or, with difficulty, drawn, Lasker sacrificed a pawn. But what a sacrifice! I have seen no such sacrifice in any modern games! It was impossible to know whether it should be accepted or refused. As the saying goes, “it shook the board”. Here was the “eccentricity” of the old teacher of philosophy and mathematics of the University of Breslau who took his opponents by surprise. The result was that after a few moves it was Lasker, not Tarrasch, who had the better game.>

Could someone post a link to this mentioned Lasker vs. Tarrasch game?

Thanks.

Apr-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Method B>

I don't think anyone knows. It's been argued on these site. Here are a couple of candidates.

Tarrasch vs Lasker, 1908

Lasker vs Tarrasch, 1923

Apr-15-13  Olavi: <keypusher: Method B> Those are the candidates, and it must be the first one, because in the 1923 game a) it was obvious the sacrifice should be accepted b) the sacrifice is not so special, just a way to keep above water.
Apr-16-13  Lambda: I seem to remember a game from the 1916 match being proposed as a possibility.
Apr-16-13  Olavi: Well move 33 here Lasker vs Tarrasch, 1916, but is there really a sensible way to decline that sacrifice? Well perhapps, Nxc5 Rxe5 Kf6 Re8 Nd7.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 70)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 70 OF 70 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies