chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker
Lasker 
 

Number of games in database: 1,541
Years covered: 1887 to 1940
Overall record: +384 -84 =176 (73.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 897 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (230) 
    C68 C62 C66 C67 C64
 French Defense (115) 
    C11 C12 C13 C01 C10
 French (80) 
    C11 C12 C13 C10 C00
 King's Gambit Accepted (80) 
    C39 C33 C38 C35 C37
 Sicilian (60) 
    B45 B32 B30 B40 B20
 King's Gambit Declined (58) 
    C30 C31 C32
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (129) 
    C65 C67 C66 C68 C77
 Orthodox Defense (51) 
    D50 D63 D52 D60 D53
 Giuoco Piano (42) 
    C50 C53 C54
 Sicilian (32) 
    B32 B45 B73 B83 B30
 Queen's Pawn Game (32) 
    D00 D05 D02 D04 A46
 Queen's Gambit Declined (21) 
    D37 D35 D30 D39 D06
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Lasker vs J Bauer, 1889 1-0
   Lasker vs Capablanca, 1914 1-0
   Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1896 0-1
   Marshall vs Lasker, 1907 0-1
   Lasker vs W E Napier, 1904 1-0
   Euwe vs Lasker, 1934 0-1
   Reti vs Lasker, 1924 0-1
   Lasker vs Schlechter, 1910 1-0
   M Porges vs Lasker, 1896 0-1
   Tarrasch vs Lasker, 1908 0-1

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894)
   Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896)
   Lasker - Marshall World Championship Match (1907)
   Lasker - Tarrasch World Championship Match (1908)
   Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910)
   Lasker - Schlechter World Championship Match (1910)
   Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Impromptu International Congress, New York (1893)
   Lasker - Bird (1890)
   London (1899)
   St. Petersburg Quadrangular 1895/96 (1895)
   Nuremberg (1896)
   Paris (1900)
   Lasker - Janowski (1909)
   St. Petersburg (1914)
   New York (1924)
   Maehrisch-Ostrau (1923)
   St. Petersburg (1909)
   Moscow (1925)
   Hastings (1895)
   Cambridge Springs (1904)
   Zuerich (1934)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   -ER Lasker by fredthebear
   -ER Lasker by rpn4
   Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
   Emanuel Lasker Collection by rpn4
   Match Lasker! by amadeus
   Match Lasker! by docjan
   The Unknown Emanuel Lasker by MissScarlett
   The Lion King by chocobonbon
   Treasure's Ark by Gottschalk
   Why Lasker Matters (Soltis) by PassedPawnDuo
   Why Lasker Matters (Soltis) by Qindarka
   Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by PassedPawnDuo
   Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by StoppedClock
   Why Lasker Matters by Edwin Meijer

GAMES ANNOTATED BY LASKER: [what is this?]
   Rubinstein vs Lasker, 1909
   Rubinstein vs Salwe, 1908
   Spielmann vs Rubinstein, 1909
   Tartakower vs Schlechter, 1909
   Lasker vs Teichmann, 1909
   >> 81 GAMES ANNOTATED BY LASKER


Search Sacrifice Explorer for Emanuel Lasker
Search Google for Emanuel Lasker

EMANUEL LASKER
(born Dec-24-1868, died Jan-11-1941, 72 years old) Germany

[what is this?]

Emanuel Lasker was the second official World Chess Champion, reigning for a record 27 years after he defeated the first World Champion, Wilhelm Steinitz, in 1894.

Statistician Jeff Sonas of Chessmetrics writes, "if you look across players' entire careers, there is a significant amount of statistical evidence to support the claim that Emanuel Lasker was, in fact, the most dominant player of all time." http://en.chessbase.com/post/the-gr... By Sonas' reckoning, Lasker was the No. 1 player in the world for a total of 24.3 years between 1890 and 1926. Only Kasparov (21.9 years) even approaches this.

Background

Lasker was born in what was then Berlinchen (literally "little Berlin") in Prussia, and which is now Barlinek in Poland. In 1880, he went to school in Berlin, where he lived with his older brother Berthold Lasker, who was studying medicine, and who taught him how to play chess. By Chessmetrics' analysis, Berthold was one of the world's top ten players in the early 1890s.

Tournaments

Soon after Lasker obtained his abitur in Landsberg an der Warthe, now a Polish town named Gorzow Wielkopolski, the teenager's first tournament success came when he won the Café Kaiserhof's annual Winter tournament 1888/89, winning all 20 games. Soon afterwards, he tied with Emil von Feyerfeil with 12/15 (+11 -2 =2) at the second division tournament of the sixth DSB Congress in Breslau, defeating von Feyerfeil in the one game play-off.* Also in 1889, he came second with 6/8 (+5 -1 =2) behind Amos Burn at the Amsterdam "A" (stronger) tournament, ahead of James Mason and Isidor Gunsberg, two of the strongest players of that time. In 1890 he finished third in Graz behind Gyula Makovetz and Johann Hermann Bauer, then shared first prize with his brother Berthold in a tournament in Berlin. In spring 1892, he won two tournaments in London, the second and stronger of these without losing a game. At New York 1893, he won all thirteen games, one of a small number of significant tournaments in history in which a player achieved a perfect score. Wikipedia article: List of world records in chess#Perfect tournament and match scores

After Lasker won the title, he answered his critics who considered that the title match was by an unproven player against an aging champion by being on the leader board in every tournament before World War I, including wins at St Petersburg in 1895-96, Nurenberg 1896, London 1899, Paris 1900 ahead of Harry Nelson Pillsbury (by two points with a score of +14 −1 =1), Trenton Falls 1906, and St Petersburg in 1914. He also came 3rd at Hastings 1895 (this relatively poor result possibly occurring during convalescence after nearly dying from typhoid fever), 2nd at Cambridge Springs in 1904, and =1st at the Chigorin Memorial tournament in St Petersburg in 1909. In 1918, a few months after the war, Lasker won a quadrangular tournament in Berlin against Akiba Rubinstein, Carl Schlechter and Siegbert Tarrasch.

After he lost the title in 1921, Lasker remained in the top rank of players, winning at Maehrisch-Ostrau (1923) ahead of Richard Reti, Ernst Gruenfeld, Alexey Selezniev, Savielly Tartakower, and Max Euwe. His last tournament win was at New York 1924, where he scored 80% and finished 1.5 points ahead of Jose Raul Capablanca, followed by Alexander Alekhine and Frank Marshall. In 1925, he came 2nd at Moscow behind Efim Bogoljubov and ahead of Capablanca, Marshall, Tartakower, and Carlos Torre Repetto. There followed a long hiatus from chess caused by his intention to retire from the game, but he re-emerged in top-class chess in 1934, placing 5th in Zurich behind Alekhine, Euwe, Salomon Flohr and Bogoljubow and ahead of Ossip Bernstein, Aron Nimzowitsch, and Gideon Stahlberg. In Moscow in 1935, Lasker finished in an undefeated third place, a half point behind Mikhail Botvinnik and Flohr and ahead of Capablanca, Rudolf Spielmann, unknown player, Grigory Levenfish, Andre Lilienthal, and Viacheslav Ragozin. Reuben Fine hailed the 66-year-old Lasker's performance as "a biological miracle". In 1936, Lasker placed 6th in Moscow and finished his career later that year at Nottingham when he came =7th with 8.5/14 (+6 -3 =5), his last-round game being the following stylish win: Lasker vs C H Alexander, 1936.

Matches

Non-title matches 1889 saw his long career in match play commence, one which only ceased upon relinquishing his title in 1921. He won nearly of his matches, apart from a few drawn mini-matches, including a drawn one-game play-off match against his brother Berthold in Berlin in 1890, losing only exhibition matches with Mikhail Chigorin, Carl Schlechter and Marshall, and a knight-odds match against Nellie Showalter, Jackson Showalter's wife. In 1889, he defeated Curt von Bardeleben (+1 =2) and in 1889-90 he beat Jacques Mieses (+5 =3). In 1890, he defeated Henry Bird (+7 -2 =3) and Nicholas Theodore Miniati (+3 =2 -0), and in 1891 he beat Francis Joseph Lee (+1 =1) and Berthold Englisch (+2 =3). 1892 and 1893 saw Lasker getting into his stride into the lead up to his title match with Steinitz, beating Bird a second time (5-0) Lasker - Bird (1892) , Joseph Henry Blackburne (+6 =4), Jackson Whipps Showalter (+6 -2 =2) and Celso Golmayo Zupide (+2 =1). In 1892, Lasker toured and played a series of mini-matches against leading players in the Manhattan, Brooklyn and Franklin Chess Clubs. At the Manhattan Chess Club, he played a series of three-game matches, defeating James Moore Hanham, Gustave Simonson, David Graham Baird, Charles B Isaacson, Albert Hodges, Eugene Delmar, John S Ryan and John Washington Baird of the 24 games he played against these players he won 21, losing one to Hodges and drawing one each with Simonson and Delmar. At the Brooklyn Chess Club, Lasker played two mini-matches of two games each, winning each game against Abel Edward Blackmar and William M De Visser, and drew the first game of an unfinished match against Philip Richardson. Lasker finished 1892 at the Franklin Chess Club by playing 5 mini-matches of two games each against its leading players, winning every game against Dion Martinez, Alfred K Robinson, unknown player and Hermann G Voigt and drawing a match (+1 -1) with Walter Penn Shipley. Shipley offered cash bonuses if he could stipulate the openings and taking up the challenge, Lasker played the Two Knight's Defense and won in 38 moves, while in the second game, Shipley won as Black in 24 moves against Lasker playing the White end of a Vienna Gambit, Steinitz variation (Opening Explorer). Shipley, who counted both Lasker and Steinitz as his friends, was instrumental in arranging the Philadelphia leg of the Lasker-Steinitz match, that being games 9, 10 and 11. 29 years later, Shipley was also the referee of Lasker's title match with Capablanca. In 1892-3, Lasker also played and won some other matches against lesser players including Andres Clemente Vazquez (3-0), A Ponce (first name Albert) (2-0) and Alfred K Ettlinger (5-0). Also in 1893, Mrs. Nellie Showalter, wife of Jackson Showalter and one of the leading women players in the USA, defeated Lasker 5-2 in a match receiving Knight odds.

These matches pushed Lasker to the forefront of chess, and after being refused a match by Tarrasch, he defeated Steinitz for the world title in 1894 after spreadeagling the field at New York 1893. While he was World Champion, Lasker played some non-title matches, the earliest of which was a six-game exhibition match against Chigorin in 1903 which he lost 2.5-3.5 (+1 -2 =3); the match was intended as a rigorous test of the Rice Gambit, which was the stipulated opening in each game. In the midst of his four title defenses that were held between 1907 and 1910, Lasker played and won what appears to have been a short training match against Abraham Speijer (+2 =1) in 1908. Also in 1908, he played another Rice Gambit-testing match, this time against Schlechter, again losing, this time by 1-4 (+0 =2 -3), apparently prompting a rethink of the Rice Gambit as a viable weapon.** In 1909 he drew a short match (2 wins 2 losses) against David Janowski and several months later they played a longer match that Lasker easily won (7 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss). Lasker accepted a return match and they played a title match in 1910 (details below). In 1914, he drew a 2 game exhibition match against Bernstein (+1 -1) and in 1916, he defeated Tarrasch in another, clearly non-title, match by 5.5-0.5. After Lasker lost his title in 1921, he is not known to have played another match until he lost a two-game exhibition match (=1 -1) against Marshall in 1940, a few months before he died. A match between Dr. Lasker and Dr. Vidmar had been planned for 1925, but it did not eventuate.***

World Championship matches The Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894) was played in New York, Philadelphia, and Montreal. Lasker won with 10 wins, 5 losses and 4 draws. Lasker also won the Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896), played in Moscow, with 10 wins, 2 losses, and 5 draws. At one stage when Rezso Charousek ‘s star was in the ascendant, Lasker was convinced he would eventually play a title match with the Hungarian master; unfortunately, Charousek died from tuberculosis in 1900, aged 26, before this could happen. As it turned out, he did not play another World Championship for 11 years until the Lasker - Marshall World Championship Match (1907), which was played in New York, Philadelphia, Washington, Baltimore, Chicago, Memphis. Lasker won this easily, remaining undefeated with 8 wins and 7 draws.

After a prolonged period of somewhat strained relations due to Tarrasch's refusal of Lasker's offer for a match, Lasker accepted Tarrasch's challenge for the title, and the Lasker - Tarrasch World Championship Match (1908) was played in Düsseldorf and Munich, with Lasker winning with 8 wins 3 losses and five draws. In 1910, Lasker came close to losing his title when he was trailing by a full point at the tenth and last game of the Lasker - Schlechter World Championship Match (1910) (the match being played in Vienna and Berlin); Schlechter held the advantage and could have drawn the game with ease on several occasions, however, he pursued a win, ultimately blundering a Queen endgame to relinquish his match lead and allow Lasker to retain the title. Some months later, the Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910) - played in Berlin - was Lasker's final successful defense of his title, winning with 8 wins and 3 draws.

In 1912 Lasker and Rubinstein, agreed to play a World Championship match in the fall of 1914 but the match was cancelled when World War I broke out. The war delayed all further title match negotiations until Lasker finally relinquished his title upon resigning from the Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921) in Havana while trailing by four games.

Life, legacy and testimonials

Lasker's extended absences from chess were due to his pursuit of other activities, including mathematics and philosophy. He spent the last years of the 19th century writing his doctorate. Between 1902 and 1907, he played only at Cambridge Springs, using his time in the US. It was during this period that he introduced the notion of a primary ideal, which corresponds to an irreducible variety and plays a role similar to prime powers in the prime decomposition of an integer. He proved the primary decomposition theorem for an ideal of a polynomial ring in terms of primary ideals in a paper Zur Theorie der Moduln und Ideale published in volume 60 of Mathematische Annalen in 1905. A commutative ring R is now called a 'Lasker ring' if every ideal of R can be represented as an intersection of a finite number of primary ideals. Lasker's results on the decomposition of ideals into primary ideals was the foundation on which Emmy Noether built an abstract theory which developed ring theory into a major mathematical topic and provided the foundations of modern algebraic geometry. Noether's Idealtheorie in Ringbereichen (1921) was of fundamental importance in the development of modern algebra, generalising Lasker's results by giving the decomposition of ideals into intersections of primary ideals in any commutative ring with ascending chain condition.****

After Lasker lost his title, he spent a considerable amount of time playing bridge and intended to retire. However, he returned to chess in the mid-thirties as he needed to raise money after the Nazis had confiscated his properties and life savings. After the tournament in Moscow in 1936, the Laskers were encouraged to stay on and Emanuel accepted an invitation to become a member of the Moscow Academy of Science to pursue his mathematical studies, with both he and his wife, Martha, taking up permanent residence in Moscow. At this time, he also renounced his German citizenship and took on Soviet citizenship. Although Stalin's purges prompted the Laskers to migrate to the USA in 1937, it is unclear whether they ever renounced their Soviet citizenship.

Lasker was friends with Albert Einstein who wrote the introduction to the posthumous biography Emanuel Lasker, The Life of a Chess Master by Dr. Jacques Hannak (1952), writing: Emanuel Lasker was undoubtedly one of the most interesting people I came to know in my later years. We must be thankful to those who have penned the story of his life for this and succeeding generations. For there are few men who have had a warm interest in all the great human problems and at the same time kept their personality so uniquely independent.

Lasker published several chess books but as he was also a mathematician, games theorist, philosopher and even playwright, he published books in all these fields, except for the play which was performed on only one occasion. As a youth, his parents had recognised his potential and sent him to study in Berlin where he first learned to play serious chess. After he graduated from high school, he studied mathematics and philosophy at the universities in Berlin, Göttingen and Heidelberg. Lasker died in the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York in 1941, aged 72, and was buried in the Beth Olom Cemetery in Queens. He was survived by his wife and his sister, Lotta. On May 6, 2008, Dr. Lasker was among the first 40 German sportsmen to be elected into the "Hall of Fame des Deutschen Sports".

******

"It is not possible to learn much from him. One can only stand and wonder." - <Max Euwe> Euwe lost all three of his games against Lasker, the most lopsided result between any two world champions.

"My chess hero" - <Viktor Korchnoi>

"The greatest of the champions was, of course, Emanuel Lasker" - <Mikhail Tal>

"Lies and hypocrisy do not survive for long on the chessboard. The creative combination lies bare the presumption of a lie, while the merciless fact, culminating in a checkmate, contradicts the hypocrite." – <Emanuel Lasker>

*******

* E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker, 1889** http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... *** User: Karpova: Emanuel Lasker (kibitz #1449)

Notes Lasker played on the following consultation chess teams Em. Lasker / MacDonnell, Lasker / Taubenhaus, Em. Lasker / Maroczy, Em. Lasker / I Rice, Em. Lasker / Barasz / Breyer, Lasker / Pillsbury, Lasker / Chigorin / Marshall / Teichmann, Emanuel Lasker / William Ward-Higgs, Emanuel Lasker / Heinrich Wolf, Emanuel Lasker / Hermann Keidanski & Em. Lasker / L Lasek.

Wikipedia article: Emanuel Lasker
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...

Last updated: 2023-04-08 21:10:05

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 62; games 1-25 of 1,541  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Lasker vs NN 1-0101887Odds game000 Chess variants
2. NN vs Lasker  0-1331889SimulC41 Philidor Defense
3. A Reif vs Lasker 0-1131889Breslau Hauptturnier AA02 Bird's Opening
4. V Tietz vs Lasker 0-1401889Breslau Hauptturnier AC79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred
5. H Seger vs Lasker 0-1361889Hauptturnier Winners' GroupD30 Queen's Gambit Declined
6. Lasker vs Lipke 1-0471889Hauptturnier Winners' GroupC26 Vienna
7. L Mabillis vs Lasker 0-1241889Hauptturnier Winners' GroupC60 Ruy Lopez
8. E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker 1-0421889Hauptturnier Winners' GroupC30 King's Gambit Declined
9. E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker 0-1471889Hauptturnier play-offD00 Queen's Pawn Game
10. Lasker vs J Bauer 1-0381889AmsterdamA03 Bird's Opening
11. Lasker vs A van Foreest 1-0501889AmsterdamA04 Reti Opening
12. R Loman vs Lasker 0-1221889AmsterdamC79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred
13. L van Vliet vs Lasker 1-0241889AmsterdamC41 Philidor Defense
14. R Leather vs Lasker 0-1561889AmsterdamA07 King's Indian Attack
15. Gunsberg vs Lasker 0-1351889AmsterdamC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
16. Lasker vs Mason ½-½381889AmsterdamC46 Three Knights
17. Lasker vs S Polner 0-1211889Casual gameC26 Vienna
18. Lasker vs Burn ½-½151889AmsterdamC01 French, Exchange
19. J Mieses vs Lasker 0-1281889Casual gameA07 King's Indian Attack
20. von Bardeleben vs Lasker ½-½271889Lasker - Bardeleben mD50 Queen's Gambit Declined
21. Lasker vs von Bardeleben 1-0471889Lasker - Bardeleben mB06 Robatsch
22. von Bardeleben vs Lasker 1-0501889Lasker - Bardeleben mC26 Vienna
23. Lasker vs J Mieses 1-0371889Lasker - Mieses 1889/90A80 Dutch
24. J Mieses vs Lasker ½-½601889Lasker - Mieses 1889/90A07 King's Indian Attack
25. Lasker vs J Mieses ½-½701890Lasker - Mieses 1889/90D21 Queen's Gambit Accepted
 page 1 of 62; games 1-25 of 1,541  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Lasker wins | Lasker loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 42 OF 99 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-03-09  sneaky pete: <morphy58> The diagram in the American editions is wrong. My 1977 reprint of the original German edition has this diagram on page 121:


click for larger view

Aug-03-09  morphy58: Thank you, Mr. sneaky pete, for your help.

Soon I should be able to come here not only to ask questions, but also to discuss chess matters related to Emanual ''God'' Lasker (for example, about where I've got that ''God'' name) ;)

See you all soon.

morphy58

Aug-03-09  parisattack: Lasker was for many, many years my favorite player. I wore out two copies of the Hannak book and his double B sac game against Bauer was the first game I memorized. The newer Why Lasker Matters is also a wonderful book.

I rate him as one of the great Geometers - able to see a position's key tactical features X-Ray with a short glance. Kasparov, Tal and Alekhine are the other great Geometers.

I think Capablanca, however, was one step beyond the Geometers - though I am at a loss to define the specific diference. The top five All Time for me: Fischer, Capablanca (really a tie), Lasker, Kasparov, Botvinnik. But 'on any given day' Alekhine, Rubinstein, Tal, Petrosian, Karpov. After almost half-century of chess the depth and beauty of the game continues to fascinate and delight me.

Aug-03-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopBerkeley: Some of you may know that Dr. Lasker wrote a book of philosophy titled "Struggle". This book has been out of print for many years, and getting a copy of it has been difficult (believe me, I have tried!)

Surprisingly, I am delighted to see that very recently the book has become available as a digital download at no cost! (Having been published in 1907, it is in the public domain in nearly all countries.)

Our own User: SBC has written a very good piece about it here:

http://blog.chess.com/view/laskers-...

It is indeed interesting to compare Dr. Lasker's philosophical thought to that of his friend and fellow genius Albert Einstein . (A good summary of Einstein's spiritual philosophy will be found here: http://www.100bestwebsites.org/alt/... )

For those who would like to download a complete copy of Dr. Lasker's philosophical book, you may do so from this link:

http://tinyurl.com/ntbk7n

with the specific download link being

http://dds.crl.edu/loadStream.asp?i...

The book is in PDF format, and the file size is about 1 MB.

I find the section titled "The Problem" (from pages 5-12) to be particularly interesting.

But be forewarned, you will look in vain for any Chess diagrams in it! But you will find much else that is worthwhile.

As I understand it, Dr. Lasker believed his book was a generalization of his Chess philosophy to life in the broadest sense. He attributed the great synthesis of Chess theory to Wilhelm Steinitz , and believe that that great Chess luminary had developed his theory after long study of the Chessgames of Paul Morphy . (See the last long quote on this page for details: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Paul_M... )

If any of you happen to read all or a portion of this intriguing book, I hope you may share your thoughts here.

Hope you are all in good spirits....

(: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :)

Aug-03-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopBerkeley: P.S. Should you download Dr. Lasker's book, please be aware that the first page of the scan is blank -- you will have to scroll down to the second page before the text begins....
Aug-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopBerkeley: Also, for those who might have an interest...

Dr. Lasker does not appear to have had a problem with self-doubt! He was confident his philosophical system would one day become very influential in human affairs.

Here are two pages from his "Manual of Chess" which present his hopes and expectations for his philosophical work.

http://100bestwebsites.org/alt/Lask...

http://100bestwebsites.org/alt/Lask...

from the "Manual of Chess" by Dr. Emanuel Lasker (1925 (in German), Dover edition (in English): 1960). Dover Publications, p. 248-249. ISBN 0486206408.

Perhaps he translated just a bit of this confidence into victories over the Chess board!

(: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :)

Aug-04-09  morphy58: On page 9 of this series on Lasker, «chesscomplexity» gave us nice quotes about Emanual Lasker, from Capablanca, Alekhine, Botvinnik, Tal and Karpov.

But he stayed here only one year :

User: chesscomplexity

It would have been nice if he gave the sources of the quotes : titles of books and the pages.

Maybe I will find these answers later, on page 10, 11, ..., 42 ;) as I plan to read (at least diagonally) all the pages).

morphy58 (Montréal, Canada)

Aug-06-09  morphy58: Hi ! everybody. I'm still around and I need more help, if you don't mind.

My post this is about a position in a game Paulsen vs. Morphy in Lasker's Manual of Chess.

The blue book (Dover, 1960) has it on page 112.
Diagram 7 shows the white queen rook on a1, NOT a2.

But according to chessgames.com, the white queen-rook is on a2, NOT a1.

Paulsen vs Morphy, 1857

The same with Tartacover (500 Master Games of Chess, page 173). (I purposely don't write ''Tartakower''.)

But there is a huge problem.

If the rook really stand on a2, then Lasker would not have given this variation on page 113 :

''There was, however, another method to parry the threat, namely, by attacking the formidable Rook on Kt3 with 4.Q-Q3 (...) therefore: 4...P-K4. After this (...) 5.R-Q1 (...) 5...B-Kt7ch.; 6.K-Kt1, BxPch.; 7.K-B1, BxR; 8.Q-B4ch.; K-B1; 9.P-Q4, , whereupon Black would surely win the ending with 9...,B-K7ch.; 10.QxB, R-k78ch., etc.’’

A) But if the a-rook stands on a2, not a1, this line does not work for Black.

B) Could Lasker have been wrong about the position of the white queen rook concerning such a well known combination of Morphy ?

Note that the 2008 edition also has that mysterious rook on a1.

So, ladies (?) and gentlemen, what do you think of all that ?

And do you know why I keep asking questions about our classic Lasker's Manual of Chess ?

Thank you very much.

Morphy58 (Montréal, Canada)

Sep-13-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Morphy58> I believe that the quotations are from Kasparov's "My Great Predecessors". For instance, Petrosian's quote about Steinitz is on p.116 of Vol.1; and Karpov's quote on Lasker (and Capaablanca) can be found on p.224 of Vol.1. You can now probably find the rest for yourself.

Kasparov, unfortunately, does not provide a list of sources in his historical volumes.

Sep-28-09  whiteshark: Quote of the Day

" It is too beautiful to spend your life upon. Many times have I managed to break with Chess, yet I have always fallen in love with it again. I was too captivated by the conflict between ideas and opinions, attack and defence, life and death. "

-- Em. Lasker

Sep-28-09  whatthefat: My 6000th post, I shall place on Lasker's page, for his play has inspired and guided me the most of late. A phenomenal player, who also achieved much outside of chess. His play was remarkably human, and yet he could arguably be the greatest of all-time. The more I study his games, the more impressed I am. For those unfamiliar with this great player, I highly recommend 'Why Lasker Matters' by Soltis.
Sep-28-09  TylerD: Greatest players ever (and I base this list on actual achievments - not on personal taste or could/would/should...):

1. Kasparov.
2. Lasker.
3. Aljechin.
4. Steinitz.
5. Karpov.
6. Anderssen.
7. Capablanca.
8. Fischer.

Sep-28-09  KamikazeAttack: Strike out Fischer and replace with Petrosian for starters.

Fischer can never be rated highter than a succesful multiple defending chess champion.

Oct-07-09  TheFocus: Lasker was a great champion. In 26 tournaments, he placed 1st in 17, 2nd in 3, 3rd in 3, once 5th, once 6th, and once 7th. In only one tournament did Lasker finish with a minus score.

In 45 matches, he won 37, drew 6, and lost only twice, to Capablanca in 1921, and to Marshall in an exhibition match in 1940.

He played in only one team event.

Final score: +359=174-67.

Not bad for someone that would take a few years off every now and then.

Nov-30-09  TheFocus: For the Lasker fans: A mammoth book of exceptional quality has just been published: Emanuel Lasker Denker Weltenbürger Schachweltmeister edited by Richard Forster, Stefan Hansen and Michael Negele (Berlin, 2009). It is a beautifully-produced hardback – 1,079 large pages (German text) with hundreds of photographs, many previously unseen. The two dozen contributors of the chapters on various aspects of Lasker’s life and careers include John Donaldson, John Hilbert, Robert Hübner and Victor Korchnoi.

The book, simply unmissable, can be acquired direct from the publisher, Exzelsior Verlag. The website is www.zeitschriftschach.de. The cost is 114 Euros.

Nov-30-09  Bjornemann: Thanks for the tip Focus
Dec-17-09  whiteshark: Quote of the Day

" A game played by men of equal strength, if played accurately, will end in a draw, and it is apt to be dull. "

-- Em. Lasker

Dec-17-09  FHBradley: I can understand why a game that is played by men of equal strength, if played accurately, will end in a draw, but how does it follow that such a game is apt to be dull?
Dec-24-09  talisman: Happy Birthday E man U ELLLLLLL!
Merry Christmas Everyone!
Dec-25-09  whiteshark: "If Steinitz continually took pains to discover combinations, the success or failure of his diligent search could not be explained by him as due to chance. Hence, he concluded that some characteristic, a quality of the given position, must exist that would indicate the success or the failure of the search before it was actually undertaken."

-- Emanuel Lasker

quoted today at http://www.gmchess.com/

Dec-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Has anyone seen or read Lasker's 1907 book "Struggle"? The core of the book is the concept of "macheeides", who are ideal beings with no freedom in their conduct of a "machee" (struggle). To quote Bill Hartston "It was close to being unreadable, appeared to have no practical implications, and was enthusiastically ignored by everyone".
Dec-27-09  theagenbiteofinwit: <GrahamClayton>
I don't think you're being fair to Lasker in this instance.

Lasker writes that Macheeides have no freedom in their conduct because they always make the best moves. His argument is that a bad player has a wide variety of poor actions or moves to choose from, but macheeides are bound to only making the best move or action, meaning they never have a choice.

<Bill Hartston> is correct about it not having a practical application. Lasker explicitly states that macheeides only exist conceptually. The concept is a thought experiment, and might I add a logically sound one. "Struggle" was an influence on von Neumann, who himself developed the concept of Game Theory.

I am very surprised at Hartston's attitude toward the work. I would expect someone who studied mathematics at Cambridge not to be so dismissive.

Dec-27-09  Ultra: Is this the same Graham Clayton who wrote the "Besst" article for AutoPuzzles?
Dec-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Ultra,
Is this the same Graham Clayton who wrote the "Besst" article for AutoPuzzles?

Ultra,
Yes, the one and the same!

Dec-27-09  AnalyzeThis: <FHBradley: I can understand why a game that is played by men of equal strength, if played accurately, will end in a draw, but how does it follow that such a game is apt to be dull? >

Lasker is referring to dynamic possibilities, interesting ones, left unplayed, as opposed to the well known paths which lead to draws.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 99)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 42 OF 99 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC